March, 2019 and the impugned order came to be passed on 31st October, 2019.
It is contended on behalf of the appellant that the impugned order is
bereft of any reasoning and is liable to be set aside being in violation of the
principles of natural justice. In support of such contention, the appellant relies
on Decco Worldwide Post Harvest Holdings B.V. and Another vs. Controller of
Patents and Designs and Another (2023 SCC OnLine Cal1130), Protean Electric
Ltd. Vs. The Controller of Patents and Designs (MANU/WB/0740/2023), Otsuka
Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. Vs. Controller of Patents (2022 SCC OnLine Del 4982),
Dolby International AB Vs. Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs (2023
SCC OnLine Del 1521), Assistant Commissioner, Commercial Tax Department,
Works Contract & Leasing, Kota Vs. M/s Shukla & Brothers (2010 SCC OnLine
SC 466).