Karan Rajwar @ Karan Kumar Rajwar vs The State Of Jharkhand …. …. …. … on 15 January, 2025

0
52

Jharkhand High Court

Karan Rajwar @ Karan Kumar Rajwar vs The State Of Jharkhand …. …. …. … on 15 January, 2025

Author: Anil Kumar Choudhary

Bench: Anil Kumar Choudhary

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
                    A.B.A. No.8135 of 2024
                               ------

Karan Rajwar @ Karan Kumar Rajwar, aged about 21 years, son of
Kartik Rajwar @ Shankar Rajwar, resident of House No.-31, Ward
No.13, Chandwari, P.O. + P.S.-Madhupur, Dist.-Deoghar.

…. …. …. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand …. …. …. Opposite Party

——

CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

——

     For the Petitioner         : Mr. Rahul Ranjan, Advocate
     For the State              : Mr. P.D. Agrawal, Spl.P.P.
     For the Informant          : Mr. Sourabh Kumar Das, Advocate
                                : Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocate
                                      ------
     Order No.02 Dated- 15/01/2025
           Heard the parties.

Apprehending his arrest in connection with Madhupur P.S. Case
No.110 of 2024 instituted under Sections 341, 323, 325, 379, 307, 504 & 34
of the Indian Penal Code, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of
privileges of anticipatory bail.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the
allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in furtherance of
common intention with the co-accused person attempted to murder the
informant. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false.
It is next submitted that the petitioner has no intention to kill the
informant and because of some misunderstanding, this false case has
been foisted. It is jointly submitted by the learned counsel for the
petitioner and the learned counsel for the informant that the matter has
been resolved between the parties and informant does not want to
proceed with the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes
to co-operate with the investigation of the case. Hence, it is submitted that
the petitioner be given the privileges of anticipatory bail.

Learned Spl.P.P appearing for the State opposes the prayer for
anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and
circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of
anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed
to surrender in the Court below within six weeks from today and in the
event of his arrest or surrendering, he will be enlarged on bail on
furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two
sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.,
Madhupur in connection with Madhupur P.S. Case No.110 of 2024 with
the condition that he will co-operate with the investigation of the case
and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him
and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with
an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the
pendency of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section
482 (2)
of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)
Abhiraj/

[ad_1]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here