assigning the reasons that,
“the Court cannot go behind the decree, as in the
Judgment and Decree passed in the suit vide T.S. No.9
of 1991, the ground raised by the petitioners
(defendant Nos.1 and 2) in CMA No.1 of 2006 was
considered and replied in negative clarifying that, the
settlement of the suit land under Section 8(1) of the
OEA Act, 1951 even in the name of one member of the
joint family, the same was for the benefit of all the
members of the joint family including the plaintiffs and
on the basis of the said observations, the preliminary
decree thereof was passed and thereafter, final decree
was also passed in that suit in presence of the parties
including defendant Nos.1 and 2.