had submitted that impugned judgment dated 08.02.2020 as well
as impugned order dated 06.06.2025 are arbitrary and ought to
be set aside, for the reason that the same are passed in violation
of the provisions of Workmen Compensation Act and principle of
natural justice.
4. It was further submitted that learned trial Court had
only considered the evidence produced by the respondents and
had not considered the reply of the petitioners, thereby
committing a serious error.
[2025:RJ-JP:32308] (3 of 5) [CW-12294/2025]
5. Further, it was submitted that there was no employer-
employee relationship inter-se the petitioners and the
respondents, therefore, there is no applicability of provisions of
the Act. Furthermore, it was submitted that due to the negligence
of the counsel representing the petitioners therein, they were
unable to adduce their evidence before the learned trial Court.
[ad_1]
Source link