Heard the submissions of both the learned advocates for
the parties.
2. Perused the material available in the case diary as well as
the statements made by various witnesses under Section
180 of BNSS coupled with the contents of FIR which
prima facie reveals a family feud between the parties as
also a counter case has been filed on behalf of the present
petitioners. Considering the facts and circumstances,
this Court finds no such incriminating materials against
the petitioners for which custodial interrogation of the
petitioners is necessary.