Andhra Pradesh High Court – Amravati
Killi Murali Tuni Ramana, vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 3 July, 2025
Author: K Sreenivasa Reddy
Bench: K Sreenivasa Reddy
'__ -; I_5ZS-:
.i
lN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATl
THURSDAY ,THE THIRD DAY OF JULY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
:`PRESENT:
--._Fg*frfft
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY
CRIMINAL PETl"ON NO: 5991 OF 2025
Between I
Killi Murali @ Tuni Ramana, S/o. Talupulayya, aged about 40 years R/o.
Ta]Iuru Village, Tuni MandaI, Kakinada District, A.P
Petitioner/Accused-7
AND
The State ofAndhra Pradesh, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of
Andhra Pradesh.
Respondent/Complainant
Petition under sections 437 a 439 of Cr.P.C, (New Sections 480 & 483
of BNSS, 2023) praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed
in support of the criminal petition, the High Court may be pleased to enlarge
the Petitioner/Accused No.7 on bail pending disposal of Crime No.78/2024 of
Narsipatnam Rural P.S., now AnakapaIIi District
COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONE`R-I : SRI| GOLLAPALLI MAHESWARA
RAO
COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT .I PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING ORDER
APHCO10287222025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
EELE (Special Original JurisdictI-On)
[3327]
THURSDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF JULY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY
£BLMINAL PETITION NO: 5991/2025
Between :
1.KILLI MURALl @ TUNI RAMANAH S/O. TALUPULAYYA, AGED
ABOUT 40 YEARS R/O. TALLURU VILLAGE, TUNI MANDAL,
KAKINADA DISTRICT, A.P
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED
AND
1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Rep by its public Prosecutor,
High Court of Andhra Pradesh.
...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
petition under section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS
prayi.ng that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of
crimlnal PetitI'On, the High Court may be pleased to enlarge the
petitioner/Accused No.7 on bail pending disposal of crime No.78/2024 of
Narsipatnam Rural P.S., now Anakapalle DistrI'Ct and to pass
Counsel for the petitioner/accused:
1. GOLLAPALLI MAHESWARA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent/complaI-nant.-
1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
The Court made the foIIowI-ng:
ORDER:
ThI’S Criminal petition, under sections 480 and 483 of the Bharatiya
Nagarik suraksha sanhita, 2023, has been fI’Ied by the petitioner/A7,
seekI’ng bail, in Crime No.78/2024 of Narsipatnam Rural Police Station,
Anakapalle Dl-strict.
t=- c.`–“9
_,_P
` L*
rty
2
2. A case has been registered against the petitioner and others for the
offences under sections 20(b)(j[‘)(C), 25 read with 8(c) of the Narcotic Drugs
and Psychotropjc substances Act.
3. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that, on 10.4,2024 at about
o4.00am, on receipt of credible information regarding illegal possession and
transportation of ganja, the s.I of Police, along wl’th staff and mediators
rushed to NeIIimetta Junction and started conducting vehicle checking. At
that time, police observed four persons coming in an auto and one person
on motorcycle. On seeing police, the inmates in the auto and the rider of
the motorcycle stopped theI-r respective Vehicles and trI-ed tO escape. Then
police apprehended four persons while the others escaped. on
interrogation, they disclosed their identity partI’Culars as that of Al to A4 and
police seized 267 kgs of ganja from their possession. They confessed the
involvement of A7 I’n transportation Of the ganja. Police seI’Zed the
contraband, arrested the accused and got him remanded to judicial custody.
Police arrested the petI-tiOner On 05.5.2025 and since then the petitl-oner is in
judicial remand.
4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Public
Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondent-state. perused the
record.
5. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor submits that the court may pass
appropriate orders.
`’.- E“9
3
6. A perusal of the material available on record goes to show that the
Petitioner Was arrested and remanded to judicI’al Custody On 05.5.2025.
PoII’Ce On Credible information seized 267 kgs of ganja from the other
accused. pursuant to the confessional statement of co-accused, the
PetI’tiOner Was arrested. No incriminatI-ng material has been seized from the
petitioner to connect the petitioner with the crime. Basing on the
confessional statement of co-accused, the petitioner has been arrested and
remanded to judicial custody.
7. In view of the aforesaI’d facts and circumstances of the case, this
court is inclined to grant baI’l tO the PetitI®Oner/A7 herein, on the following
conditions.
(I|) The petitioner/A7 herein sha” be released on his executing a
personal bond for Rs.10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand only) with two
sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned I
Additional DI’StriCt and Sessions Judge-Gum-special Judge for Trial of
Offences under the NDPS Act, Visakhapatnam,I
(ill) On release, the petitioner shall appear before the stall-On House
officer concerned once lan a Week i.e. on every Sunday between 10.00
a.m. and 05.00 p.m., tI’ll filing of charge sheet.
8. Accordingly, the crI-minaI Petition is allowed.
SD/-M.sRINi'VAs
j\ lE`-I--_ _
A`SSISTANT
//TRUE COPY// jSTRAR
SECTj
For
To,
1. The I Additional District & Sessions Judge-Special JIJdge for Trial of Offences
under NDPS Act, Visakhapatnain
2. The superintendent, central PrI’SOn, Visakhapatnam
3. The Station House officer, NarsI’Patnam Rural P.S., nowAnakapaIIi
District
4. One CC to SRl. GOLLAPALLI MAHESWARA RAO Advocate [OPUC]
5. Two CCs to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court ofA P[OUT]
6. One spare copy
HIGH COURT
SRK,J
DATED : 03/07/2025
BAIL ORDER
CRLP.No.5991 of 2025
ALLOWED
[ad_1]
Source link