Supreme Court – Daily Orders
Kiran vs Rajkumar Jivraj Jain on 29 May, 2025
ITEM NO.1 COURT NO.1 SECTION II-A
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 8169/2025
[Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 29-04-2025
in CRLA No. 201/2025 passed by the High Court of Judicature at
Bombay at Aurangabad]
KIRAN Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
RAJKUMAR JIVRAJ JAIN & ANR. Respondent(s)
(IA No. 134829/2025 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED
JUDGMENT AND IA No. 134831/2025 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.)
Date : 29-05-2025 This matter was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH
For Petitioner(s) :
Mr. Amol N. Suryavanshi, Adv.
Ms. Damini Vishwakarma, Adv.
M/S. Juristrust Law Offices, AOR
For Respondent(s) :
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in spite
of specific bar under Section 18 of the Scheduled Castes and
the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989
(hereinafter referred to as the “SC & ST Act”), the learned
Single Judge of the High Court has granted anticipatory bail.
2.
Signature Not Verified
A three-Judge Bench of this Court, in the case of
Digitally signed by
DEEPAK SINGH
Date: 2025.05.30
“Prathvi Raj Chauhan vs Union Of India” reported in (2020) 4
17:01:35 IST
Reason:
1
SCC 727 has upheld the provisions of the SC & ST Act,
including Section 18 thereof.
3. In that view of the matter, we are, prima facie, of the
view that the learned Single Judge of the High Court has
exceeded the jurisdiction vested in him.
4. Issue notice, returnable in two weeks.
5. Dasti, in addition, is permitted.
6. In addition to the usual mode, liberty is granted to the
petitioner to serve notice through the Standing Counsel for
the respondent/State.
(DEEPAK SINGH) (ANJU KAPOOR)
ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
2