Kishor Navshya Mukne vs The State Of Maharashtra on 1 April, 2025

Supreme Court – Daily Orders

Kishor Navshya Mukne vs The State Of Maharashtra on 1 April, 2025

Author: Abhay S. Oka

Bench: Abhay S. Oka

                                      IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
                                     CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                    CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.___________/2025
                              [@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL.) NO.2674/2025]


                         KISHOR NAVSHYA MUKNE                              APPELLANT(S)


                                                    VERSUS


                         THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR.                  RESPONDENT(S)


                                                   O R D E R

1. Leave granted.

2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the
parties.

3. The offences alleged against the appellant
are under Sections 307, 324, 323, 504 and 506 of
the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short, ‘the
IPC’). Subsequently, by way of supplementary
charge-sheet, Section 302 of the IPC was added.

4. We may note here that the incident is of 21 st
August, 2022 and the victim died on 3rd December,
2022 after discharge was taken from the hospital
against medical advice. The appellant has
undergone incarceration for a period of about 2 ½
Signature Not Verified years. Not a single prosecution witness has been
Digitally signed by
KAVITA PAHUJA
Date: 2025.04.02
17:27:52 IST
Reason: CRM A. @ SLP (CRL.) NO.2674/2025 1/4
examined. Therefore, the appellant is entitled to
be enlarged on bail on appropriate stringent terms
and conditions.

5. For that purpose, the appellant shall be
produced before the Trial Court within a maximum
period of one week from today. The Trial Court
shall enlarge the appellant on bail pending the
trial on appropriate stringent terms and
conditions including the condition of regularly
and punctually attending the Trial Court and
cooperating with the Trial Court for early
disposal of the case. The Public Prosecutor shall
be heard before fixing the terms and conditions.

6. The Appeal is accordingly allowed.

7. Pending applications stand disposed of.

……………………..J.
(ABHAY S.OKA)

……………………..J.
(UJJAL BHUYAN)

NEW DELHI;

APRIL 1, 2025.

CRM A. @ SLP (CRL.) NO.2674/2025 2/4

ITEM NO.10 COURT NO.4 SECTION II-A

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No.
2674/2025

[Arising out of impugned final judgment and order
dated 07-08-2024 in CRLBA No. 1924/2024 passed by
the High Court of Judicature at Bombay]

KISHOR NAVSHYA MUKNE Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR. Respondent(s)

Date : 01-04-2025 This petition was called on for
hearing today.

CORAM :

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY S. OKA
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN

For Petitioner(s) :Mr. Prakash D. Naik, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Shantanu Phanse, Adv.
Ms. Vidhi Pankaj Thaker, Adv.
Ms. Preet Phanse, Adv.

Mr. Prastut Mahesh Dalvi, AOR

For Respondent(s) :Mr. Bharat Bagla, Adv.

Mr. Siddharth Dharmadhikari, Adv.
Mr. Aaditya Aniruddha Pande, AOR

CRM A. @ SLP (CRL.) NO.2674/2025 3/4
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the
following
O R D E R

Leave granted.

The appeal is allowed in terms of the signed

order which is placed on the file.

The operative portion of the signed order

reads thus:

“For that purpose, the appellant shall
be produced before the Trial Court
within a maximum period of one week
from today. The Trial Court shall
enlarge the appellant on bail pending
the trial on appropriate stringent
terms and conditions including the
condition of regularly and punctually
attending the Trial Court and
cooperating with the Trial Court for
early disposal of the case. The
Public Prosecutor shall be heard
before fixing the terms and
conditions.”

Pending application(s), if any, shall stand

disposed of.

(KAVITA PAHUJA) (AVGV RAMU)
ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH)

CRM A. @ SLP (CRL.) NO.2674/2025 4/4