Krupa Communications, Rep By Its … vs 16It Solutions, Proprietor … on 1 April, 2025

0
21

This case is registered against the accused for the

offence punishable U/s 138 of Negotiable Instruments

Act.

3 C.C.9748/2021

2. Factual matrix of the complainant’s case is as

under:

It is stated that the complainant is running business

in the name and style of Krupa Communications dealing

in electrical and electronic goods items, fire alarm

systems and CCTV system items. The accused being it’s

regular customer has placed an order and purchased the

materials vide invoice Nos.KC/20-21/0040 dated

26.05.2020, KC/20-21/00155 dated 22.06.2020, KC/20-

21/0235 dated 08.07.2020, KC/20-21/0578 dated

25.09.2020, KC/20-21/0580 dated 26.09.2020, KC/20-

21/0606 dated 01.10.2020 and KC/20-21/0646, dated

09.10.2020 worth of Rs.6,65,851/-. The accused has issued

cheuqe bearing No.000023 dated 28.10.2020, drawn on

HDFC Bank, Bommanahalli Branch, Bangalore, towards

payment of said balance. The accused has assured that

she will arrange sufficient amount and honour the

cheque. When the complainant presented the said cheque

to the bank, it got returned with an endorsement as

‘Funds Insufficient’ vide memo dated 14.12.2020. The

complainant has intimated the same to the accused and

accused has requested to re-present the cheque on

10.12.2020. Accordingly, the complainant again presented

the cheque, but it again dishonoured for the reason

‘Funds Insufficient’ vide memo dated 14.12.2020.

Thereafter, the complainant got issued a legal notice on

13.01.2021 demanding the accused to make payment of

cheque amount within 15 days. The said notice was

returned with an endorsement as ‘no such person in this

address’ on 16.01.2021. However, the accused has not

repaid the amount. Hence the complainant has

constrained to file the present complaint.

[ad_1]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here