Supreme Court – Daily Orders
Kumar Harishchandra Yadav vs The State Of Maharashtra on 20 May, 2025
Author: Sanjay Karol
Bench: Sanjay Karol
ITEM NO.5 COURT NO.14 SECTION II-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS S.L.P. (Crl.) No(s).4772/2025 [Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 31-01-2025 in CRLBA No.2222/2024 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay] KUMAR HARISHCHANDRA YADAV PETITIONER(S) VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA RESPONDENT(S) IA No. 80367/2025 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT IA No. 80368/2025 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. Date : 20-05-2025 This matter was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KAROL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abhishek Avachat, Adv. Mr. Aditya Bartakke, Adv. Mr. Sagar Pahune Patil, AOR Signature Not Verified For Respondent(s) : Digitally signed by NAVEEN D Date: 2025.05.20 SLP(Crl.)No.4772 of 2025 1 17:24:39 IST Reason: Mr. Naman Tandon, Adv. Mr.Siddharth Dharmadhikari, Adv. Mr. Aaditya Aniruddha Pande, AOR Upon hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
1. Petitioner challenges the judgment and
order dated 31-01-2025 in Criminal Bail
Application No.2222/2024 passed by the
High Court of Judicature at Bombay, titled
“Kumar Harishchandra Yadav vs. The State
of Maharashtra”.
2. The petitioner was arrested in
connection with Crime No.246 of 2023
registered at Shivajinagar Police Station,
Pune District, Maharashtra for the
offences punishable under Sections 420,
465, 467, 468, 471, 472 & 120-B of the
Indian Penal Code, 1860.
3. Having heard learned counsel for the
parties, and perused the material placed
on record, we are of the considered view
that in view of the role ascribed to the
petitioner, he has made out case for
SLP(Crl.)No.4772 of 2025 2
interference with the impugned judgment
and order dated 31-01-2025.
4. Considering the totality of
circumstances and also the fact that the
petitioner has suffered incarceration for
a period of one year two months
(approximate), we are inclined to grant
bail to the petitioner on such terms as
may be fixed by the Trial Court. Ordered
accordingly.
5. To comply with the order, the
petitioner shall be produced before the
Trial Court forthwith.
6. Accordingly, the Special Leave
Petition is disposed of.
7. Pending application(s), if any, shall
stand disposed of.
(D. NAVEEN) (ANU BHALLA)
COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)
SLP(Crl.)No.4772 of 2025 3
[ad_1]
Source link