L.Sathi Reddy vs Bussa Narsimlu on 14 May, 2025

0
53

[ad_1]

This Civil Revision Petition has been filed against the

orders dated 11.04.2025 in C.M.A.No.11 of 2024 on the file of

the Principal District Judge, Siddipet District, refusing to grant

interim injunction to the petitioner in I.A.No.20 of 2023 in

O.S.No.18 of 2023, dated 01.03.2024, on the file of the

Additional Junior Civil Judge-cum-Additional Judicial

Magistrate of First Class at Gajwel.

2. Brief facts leading to the filing of the present Civil

Revision Petition are that the petitioner herein is the plaintiff in

the suit O.S.No.18 of 2023 filed for perpetual injection in

respect of the suit schedule property i.e., all land admeasuring

Ac.0-03.25 guntas in Survey No.323 (323/EE/1/1/2) and Ac.1-

12.25 guntas in Survey No.322 (322/A/1/1, 322/AA/1/2,

322/E/1/1 and 322/E/2/1), totally admeasuring Ac.1-15.50

guntas, situated at Ananthagiripally Village, Wargal Mandal,

Siddipet District. The boundaries of the suit schedule property

are shown as North – P.W.D road (Toopran to Gajwel), South –

land belongs to Suresh in Survey No.322, East – 12 feet wide

TMD,J

road and West – Yavapuram Shivaar. Along with the suit, the

petitioner plaintiff has also filed I.A.No.20 of 2023 for ad-interim

injunction against the respondents. The respondents opposed

the ad-interim injunction by filing a counter affidavit, denying

the averments made by the petitioner in the I.A., stating that

the suit schedule land in Survey No.323 is situated to Northern

side quite abutting to PWD road leading from Gajwel to Toopran

and land in Survey No.322 is situated towards Southern side to

the land admeasuring Survey No.323 and the petitioner plaintiff

has no land in Survey No.323 after railway track towards

Eastern side. It is further submitted that the petitioner/plaintiff

dishonestly filed a suit with an intention to grab the land in

Survey No.323 and that the respondents No.3 and 4 are the

owners and possessors of the land in Survey No.323. It is also

stated that the respondent/defendant No.3 had sold land

admeasuring Ac.0-07½ guntas of land in Survey No.323/A to

respondent/defendant No.2, through registered sale deed No.23

of 2022, dated 20.01.2022 and the respondent/defendant No.4

sold the Ac.0-07½ guntas of land to respondent/defendant No.2

through registered sale deed and therefore, the

respondent/defendant No.2 is the owner and possessor of 15

TMD,J

guntas of land in Survey No.323 purchased through separate

sale deeds from the original pattadars with the boundaries as

East : the land of Guvva Pochaiah;

[ad_2]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here