L & T Finance Ltd vs Lrcm Sugars Llp And Ors on 6 August, 2025

0
2


Calcutta High Court

L & T Finance Ltd vs Lrcm Sugars Llp And Ors on 6 August, 2025

Author: Shampa Sarkar

Bench: Shampa Sarkar

OC-40

                                ORDER SHEET

                    IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
                             ORIGINAL SIDE
                         COMMERCIAL DIVISION

                             AP-COM/544/2025

                            L & T FINANCE LTD.
                                    VS
                        LRCM SUGARS LLP AND ORS.

BEFORE:
The Hon'ble JUSTICE SHAMPA SARKAR
Date: 5th August, 2025.

                                                                        Appearance:
                                                          Ms. Shrayashee Das, Adv.
                                                     Mr. Rohan Kumar Thakur, Adv.
                                                      Mr. Tridibesh Dasgupta, Adv.
                                                                .... for the petitioner

        The Court: Affidavit of service is taken on record.

        The postal endorsement indicates that the postal authorities tried to

serve the respondents on various occasions, but the doors were found

locked in respect of respondent nos. 2 and 3. Intimation was served but the

postal article was not claimed. With regard to the service on the respondent

no.1, it appears that the addressee moved without any instruction. All the

postal articles were addressed to the last known address of each of the

respondents.

As per section 3(1)(b) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996,

read with section 27 of the General Clauses Act and the presumption under

Section 114 of the erstwhile Evidence Act, this Court is of the view that

service upon the respondents is deemed to have been effected.

The petitioner is a non-banking financial company. This is an

application for protection of an amount of Rs. 14,33,436.73/- which was
2

extended by the petitioner as a credit faculty, in favour of the respondents.

The respondents defaulted in payment of the said loan. The loan recall

notice was issued and the agreement was terminated. Although, this is an

unsecured loan, but the factum of extension of the loan is available and the

factum of default is also available. The conduct of the respondents does not

inspire the Court. They are avoiding service. There is a risk of alienation of

the assets.

The petitioner has made out a strong, prima facie, case for interim

protection. The bank account of the respondent no.1 maintained with ICICI

Bank, Account NO.399805000120 IFSC Code ICIC0003998, shall not be

operated without keeping a balance of a sum of Rs. 14 lakhs. If such

amount is not available, then the operation of the bank account shall be

stayed.

This interim order will continue for a period of two months. The

petitioner will take steps to invoke arbitration and proceed in accordance

with law.

Fresh service be issued upon the respondents.

The matter will appear on 28th August, 2025 at 10:30 a.m.

The Branch Manager of the concerned Bank will act on the basis of

the server copy of this order, to be communicated either by the petitioner

or the learned Advocate-on-record for the petitioner.

The respondents shall be at liberty to pray for variation, modification

and/or vacation of this order.

(SHAMPA SARKAR, J.)

pa/S.Mandi



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here