Rajasthan High Court – Jodhpur
Lalit Singh vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:35574) on 8 August, 2025
[2025:RJ-JD:35574]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 6351/2025
1. Lalit Singh S/o Narayan Singh Rawat, Aged About 25
Years, Residing At Sadak Ka Badiya, Nandawat, Police
Station Bheem, District Rajasamand.
2. Yashpal Singh S/o Karam Singh Rawat, Aged About 29
Years, Residing At Sadak Ka Badiya, Nandawat, Police
Station Bheem, District Rajasamand.
3. Balveer Singh @ Chandra Pal Singh S/o Heera Singh
Rawat, Aged About 21 Years, Residing At Sadak Ka
Badiya, Nandawat, Police Station Bheem, District
Rajasamand.
4. Praveen Singh S/o Chhagan Singh Rawat,, Aged About 24
Years, R/o Bala Charat, Police Station Tatgarh, District
Ajmer.
5. Chain Singh @ Pintu S/o Tej Singh Rawat, Aged About 28
Years, R/o Bartu Choraha, Police Station Bheem, District.
Rajsamand.
6. Karan Singh S/o Indra Singh Rawat, Aged About 19
Years, R/o Bartu Choraha, District Rajsamand.
7. Vikas Singh S/o Indra Singh Rawat, Aged About 20 Years,
R/o Sadak Ka Badiya, Nandawat, Police Station Bheem,
District Rajasamand.
8. Tikam Singh S/o Narayan Singh Rawat, Aged About 19
Years, R/o Sadak Ka Badiya, Nandawat, Police Station
Bheem, District Rajasamand.
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor.
2. Babu Singh S/o Vijay Singh, R/o Belolo Ka Badiya,
Nandawat, Police Station Bheem, District Rajsamand.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikram Singh Jaitawat
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Prem Singh Panwar, Public
Prosecutor
Mr. Prakash Banjara for the
complainant
(Downloaded on 11/08/2025 at 09:47:55 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:35574] (2 of 3) [CRLMP-6351/2025]
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUKESH RAJPUROHIT
Order
08/08/2025
1. It is stated at the Bar that a compromise has been arrived at
between the parties and it is borne out from the compromise that
the complainant is not inclined to proceed further in the matter.
2. Learned counsel for the parties have placed reliance on a
decision of Supreme Court in case of Gian Singh V/s. State of
Punjab & Anr. [(2012) 10 SCC 303].
3. It is also submitted that upon the aforementioned
compromise, the learned Court below vide order dated
22.05.2025, has verified the compromise between the parties to
the extent of the offences under Sections 323 & 325 of IPC and
has discharged the petitioners of the offences under Sections 323
& 325 of IPC. However, the learned court below has declined to
verify the compromise with regard to the offences under Sections
147, 148, 458, 324/149, 326/149 & 307/149 of the IPC on the
ground that the said offences are non-compoundable.
4. In view of compromise arrived at between the parties as well
as the aforesaid order dated 22.05.2025 of the learned Court
below and applying the ratio in decision of Gian Singh Vs. State
of Punjab & Anr. (supra), I deem it just and proper to invoke
inherent powers of this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
5. Accordingly, the present misc. petition is allowed and the
F.I.R. No.458/2021 lodged at Police Station Bheem, District
Rajsamand and all consequential proceedings for the offences
under Sections 147, 148, 458, 324/149, 326/149 & 307/149 of
the IPC against the petitioners are hereby quashed.
(Downloaded on 11/08/2025 at 09:47:55 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:35574] (3 of 3) [CRLMP-6351/2025]
6. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.
(MUKESH RAJPUROHIT),J
103-Ramesh/-
(Downloaded on 11/08/2025 at 09:47:55 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)