Landmark Traders Pvt Ltd vs Dcit Circle 13 1 Delhi on 16 December, 2024

0
16

Delhi High Court – Orders

Landmark Traders Pvt Ltd vs Dcit Circle 13 1 Delhi on 16 December, 2024

Author: Vibhu Bakhru

Bench: Tushar Rao Gedela, Vibhu Bakhru

                                    $~53
                                    *           IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
                                    +           W.P.(C) 12492/2024
                                                LANDMARK TRADERS PVT LTD                                                        .....Petitioner
                                                                                      Through:                Mr. N. P. Sahni, Mr. Abhinav Jain,
                                                                                                              Mr. Kumar Abbas, Advocates.

                                                                                      versus

                                                DCIT CIRCLE 13 1 DELHI                                                          .....Respondent
                                                               Through:                                       Mr. Siddhartha sinha, SSC Ms. Anuja
                                                                                                              Pethia JSC, Ms. Daschita Shahi, Mr.
                                                                                                              Srikant Singh, Ms. Anu Priya
                                                                                                              Advocates.
                                                CORAM:
                                                HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
                                                HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA
                                                                 ORDER

% 16.12.2024

1. Learned counsel for the respondent seeks time to file a counter
affidavit. The issue whether the jurisdictional assessing officer had
jurisdiction to initiate proceedings under Section 148A of the Income Tax
Act, 1961 (hereinafter the Act) is covered against the petitioner. However, it
is also seen that the petitioner has also denied the fact that there were any
transactions as alleged in the notice issued under Section 148A(b) of the
Act. Notwithstanding the same, the assessing officer has considered it fit to
issue a notice under Section 148 of the Act on the ground that there is some
information in respect to the allegations set out in the notice under Section
148A(b)
. However, it appears that the assessing officer does not have any
such information in his possession.

2. In view of the above the interim order shall continue till the next date

This is a digitally signed order.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/12/2024 at 21:21:41
of hearing.

3. Counter affidavit be filed within a period of four weeks. Rejoinder if
any be filed before the next date of hearing.

4. List on 17.04.2025.

VIBHU BAKHRU, ACJ

TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J
DECEMBER 16, 2024/KG

Click here to check corrigendum, if any

This is a digitally signed order.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/12/2024 at 21:21:41



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here