The Bombay High Court has established crucial procedural requirements for bail applications in POCSO cases4. It is mandatory to issue notice of hearing of case and bail application to victim of an offence under POCSO Act. The court declared that Section 40 of the POCSO Act read with Rule 4 of the POCSO Rules necessarily require that the Legal Representative of the Child Victim, Parents, or Guardians as the case may be, is heard before releasing the suspected offender on Bail.
The court further directed compliance with Section 439 (1-A) of the Cr.P.C. and declare that the provisions/practices to be followed under Section 439 (1-A) of the Cr.P.C. are also made mutatis mutandis applicable to offences under the POCSO Act with respect to the bail applications moved by the Accused/Offender in such cases4.
Read full judgment: Bombay HC: It is mandatory to issue notice of hearing of case and bail application to victim of an offence under Pocso Act
Bail Framework for Juvenile Offenders Under JJ Act
Section 12 of JJ Act: Mandatory Release Provision
The Supreme Court has reinforced the fundamental principle governing juvenile bail2. Section 12 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act mandates that juveniles “shall, notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 or in any other law for the time being in force, be released on bail with or without surety”.
A plain reading of Section 12(1) of the Act reveals that, any person, who is apparently a child, shall be entitled to be released on bail with or without surety or placed under the supervision of a probation officer or under the care of any fit person. The distinction between bailable or non-bailable offence has been done away with in respect of a juvenile5.
Read full judgment: Supreme Court: Juvenile Cannot Be Denied Bail Without Recording Finding That Proviso To S. 12(1) Juvenile Justice Act Is Applicable
Supreme Court’s Recent Ruling on Juvenile Bail
The Supreme Court in its recent judgment has directed that “the juvenile in conflict with law shall be released on bail without surety” and ordered appropriate supervision by probation officers2. The Court emphasized that juveniles cannot be denied bail without recording finding that proviso to Section 12(1) of Juvenile Justice Act is applicable.
Read full judgment: Whether the court can refuse to release juvenile on bail under Section 12 of the Juvenile Justice Act
Age Determination in Bail Applications
Allahabad High Court Guidelines on Age Assessment
The Allahabad High Court in Monish Vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others has laid down comprehensive guidelines for age determination in bail applications1. The court held that:
“The procedure for determination of a victim’s age provided in Section 94 of the JJ Act, 2015 read with JJ Rules, 2016 shall not apply to bail applications, though the documents therein are liable to be considered. Age of victim as per procedure prescribed in Section 94 of the JJ Act, 2015 is determined conclusively only in the trial”1.
“The accused has a right to assail the veracity of the age of the victim as stated in the prosecution case” and “the assessment of age in a bail order is of a tentative nature, and is based on probative value of documents which are yet to be proved or statements of witnesses who are still to be examined in court”1.
Read full judgment: Whether it is mandatory to determine age of victim in the same manner as provided under Section 94 of JJ Act while deciding bail application under POCSO Act
Practical Considerations in Age-Related Cases
The Allahabad High Court noted that “a large number of cases under the POCSO Act relate to runaway couples, and arise from family opposition to such relationships. In bail application excluding evidence or limiting the challenge to the age of the victim which is often on the borderline of majority and at times false, would result in miscarriage of justice for the accused”7.
Read full judgment: Whether the presumption of culpable intent U/S 29 of the POCSO Act is attracted against the accused at the stage of bail
Factors for Consideration in Adult POCSO Cases
Comprehensive Assessment Criteria
Courts have established detailed factors to be considered while deciding bail applications in POCSO cases6:
Primary considerations include:
-
whether there is any prima facie or reasonable ground to believe that the accused had committed the offence
-
nature and gravity of the accusation
-
severity of the punishment in the event of conviction
-
danger of the accused absconding or fleeing, if released on bail
-
character, behaviour, means, position and standing of the accused in the society
-
likelihood of the offence being repeated
-
reasonable apprehension of the witnesses being influenced
-
danger, of course, of justice being thwarted by the grant of bail6
Additional POCSO-specific considerations:
-
The age of the Victim
-
Age difference between victim and accused
-
Mental and physical well-being of child victim
-
Ferociousness of the offence
-
Relationship between victim and accused
-
Vicinity of residence of accused and victim, and willingness of accused to reside elsewhere during trial6
Read full judgment: What additional factors the court should consider while releasing accused on bail for an offence under the Pocso Act?
Presumption Under Section 29 of POCSO Act
Application at Bail Stage
The Allahabad High Court has clarified that “presumption of culpable intent of the accused under Sections 29 of the POCSO Act, 2012 shall not apply at the stage of pretrial bails”7. This significant ruling provides clarity on when the presumption under Section 29 becomes applicable.
Read full judgment: Whether the presumption of culpable intent U/S 29 of the POCSO Act is attracted against the accused at the stage of bail
Legal Framework for Bail in POCSO Cases
Courts have established that “since section 31 says that a Special Court appointed under the POCSO Act is deemed to be a Court of Sessions under the Cr.P.C., the provisions of section 439 Cr.P.C., for grant of bail, as briefly discussed above, would govern such proceedings before the Special Court”8.
Read full judgment: Factor to be considered by court while deciding bail application under POCSO Act
Bail and Time Limitations
Karnataka High Court Ruling on Bail
The Karnataka High Court has ruled that accused cannot enforce the right to be released on bail. No such right is envisaged under the said provisions of the Act and the same cannot be read into it by way of an interpretation which may go against the interest of the child victim3.
The court held that “any order passed by following the dictum in Vinay with regard to grant of bail to the accused on the premise there has been a delay in recording evidence or for that matter, non-conclusion of the proceedings within a period of one year from the date of taking cognizance by the Special Court, is not good law and it cannot be a precedent for future cases”3.
Read full judgment: Whether court should release the accused on default bail in the Pocso case if the court fails to record evidence of the victim child within one year
Key Takeaways for Session Judges
For Juvenile Offenders:
-
Apply Section 12 of JJ Act mandating bail as default position
-
Record specific reasons if denying bail under proviso exceptions
-
Consider supervision by probation officers as alternative to detention
-
Release juveniles on bail without surety unless proviso conditions are met
For Adult Offenders:
-
Balance multiple factors including nature of offense, victim protection, and flight risk
-
Consider that Section 29 presumption does not apply at pretrial bail stage
-
Ensure victim notification and protective conditions in bail orders
-
Apply comprehensive assessment criteria specific to POCSO cases
Universal Requirements:
-
Issue mandatory notice to victims and their legal representatives
-
Allow accused to challenge victim’s age in bail proceedings
-
Conduct tentative age assessment without following strict Section 94 procedures
-
Ensure detailed reasoning in bail orders with proper legal basis
-
Consider the protective objectives of POCSO Act while balancing individual liberty
This comprehensive framework ensures both compliance with legal requirements and protection of child victims while maintaining the fundamental right to bail within established legal parameters, as endorsed by various High Courts and the Supreme Court of India.