I. Introduction
The Supreme Court of India, in its ruling dated January 07, 2025, in the case of Indian Overseas Bank v. M.A.S Subramanian & Ors., reaffirmed the principle that an agreement for sale does not transfer ownership or create an interest in property under Section 54 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. The judgment clarifies the limited jurisdiction of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) in matters concerning property ownership rights.
II. Factual Background
The dispute arose over a piece of land where the late M.A. Shanmugam, the original owner, had agreed to sell the property to a company in exchange for shares. The NCLAT had ruled that the company was in possession of the land by way of part-performance and declared a sale deed executed by the legal representatives of Shanmugam as not binding on the company.
The appellant, Indian Overseas Bank, contested this finding, arguing that an agreement for sale does not create ownership rights in favor of the company.
III. Issues Before the Supreme Court
- Whether an agreement for sale confers ownership or an interest in immovable property?
- Whether the NCLAT had the jurisdiction to declare the sale deed as not binding on the company?
- Whether the company’s possession amounted to part-performance under Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882?
IV. Arguments Advanced
A. Appellant’s (Indian Overseas Bank) Arguments:
- The appellant relied on Section 54 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, which states that a sale of immovable property valued over ₹100 must be executed through a registered sale deed.
- The mere agreement for sale did not transfer ownership to the company, and no valid title was created.
- The NCLAT overstepped its jurisdiction by adjudicating on property ownership, a matter beyond its scope.
B. Respondents’ Arguments:
- The company had possessed the land for a long period, constituting part-performance under Section 53A.
- The sale deed executed by Shanmugam’s legal heirs should be set aside as the company’s rights were superior.
- The petitioners had clean hands and should be entitled to claim the land based on their shareholding in the company.
V. Judgment and Legal Reasoning
The Supreme Court partially allowed the appeal and made the following observations:
- Agreement for Sale Does Not Confer Title
- The Court reaffirmed the principle that an agreement for sale does not transfer ownership or create any interest in immovable property unless a registered sale deed is executed.
- The Court cited Suraj Lamp & Industries Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Haryana (2012) 1 SCC 656, where it was held that ownership of immovable property cannot be transferred through an agreement for sale, GPA, or will.
- NCLAT’s Jurisdiction Was Exceeded
- The Court noted that the NCLAT does not have the authority to declare a sale deed as “not binding” on a company.
- The proper remedy for the company, if any, was to file a suit for specific performance under the Specific Relief Act, 1963.
- Part-Performance Not Established
-
- The Court ruled that possession under an agreement does not automatically constitute part-performance under Section 53A, especially when no suit for specific performance had been filed.
- Remedies Left Open
- The Court set aside the NCLAT’s declaration that the sale deed was not binding on the company.
- However, it clarified that the rights of all parties, including the company and the appellant, remained open for adjudication in appropriate civil proceedings.
VI. Conclusion
The Supreme Court’s judgment in Indian Overseas Bank v. M.A.S Subramanian & Ors. (2025) reinforces a well-settled legal position: an agreement for sale does not transfer ownership. The ruling serves as a critical precedent for real estate and corporate disputes, particularly in cases involving company assets and shareholder rights.
This decision highlights the limitations of the NCLAT’s jurisdiction and the necessity of approaching civil courts for specific performance and ownership disputes. Future litigants must ensure that property transactions comply with registration requirements to avoid legal complications.
FAQs:
1. Does signing an agreement to sell a property immediately transfer its ownership to me?
No, merely signing an agreement to sell a property does not transfer its legal ownership. Under Indian property law, ownership is transferred only when a proper sale deed is executed and registered.
2. What is the legal process for transferring property ownership in India?
Legal ownership of immovable property in India is transferred through a registered sale deed. An agreement for sale is only a promise to sell and does not create any interest or title in the property itself.
3. Can taking possession of a property based on an agreement for sale be considered part-performance and grant ownership?
Possession under an agreement for sale can be considered part-performance, but it does not automatically grant ownership. For a complete remedy, a lawsuit for specific performance of the agreement would typically need to be filed in a civil court.
4. Do specialized tribunals, like the NCLAT, have the authority to decide property ownership disputes?
Specialized tribunals like the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) generally do not have the jurisdiction to declare property ownership rights or invalidate sale deeds. Such matters typically fall under the purview of civil courts.
5. If an agreement to sell is not honored, what legal steps can the buyer take?
If a seller fails to honor an agreement to sell, the buyer’s primary legal remedy is to file a suit for specific performance in a civil court, seeking to compel the seller to complete the sale and register the deed.
Stay informed with insights that matter. Follow us for more updates on key legal developments.
Disclaimer
The content provided here is for general information only; it does not constitute legal advice. Reading them does not create a lawyer-client relationship, and Mahendra Bhavsar & Co. disclaims all liability for actions taken or omitted based on this content. Always obtain advice from qualified counsel for your specific circumstances. © Mahendra Bhavsar & Co.