[ad_1]
Patna High Court – Orders
Loha Yadav @ Abhay Singh Yadav @ Loha … vs The State Of Bihar on 29 August, 2025
Author: Sunil Dutta Mishra
Bench: Sunil Dutta Mishra
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43916 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-276 Year-2022 Thana- NAWANAGAR District- Buxar
======================================================
Loha Yadav @ Abhay Singh Yadav @ Loha Singh @ Abhay @ Loha Yadav
S/o- Gupteshwar Yadav, R/o- Masahariya P.S.- Murar, Dist- Buxar.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Ms. Kahkashan Alam, Advocate.
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Satyendra Narayan Singh, APP.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA
ORAL ORDER
3 29-08-2025
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the
learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with
Nawanagar P.S. Case No.276 of 2022 registered under Sections
30(a), 30(c), 30(d), 33, 34, 36, 41(1) (2) of the Bihar Prohibition
and Excise Act.
3. This is the second regular bail application filed on
behalf of the petitioner who is in custody since 27.08.2024.
Earlier, his prayer for bail was dismissed on merit vide order
dated 05.03.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No.74056 of 2024.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that trial
has already been concluded and the case is fixed for judgment.
5. Learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State
vehemently opposes the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43916 of 2025(3) dt.29-08-2025
2/2
at this stage and submitted that earlier bail petition of the
petitioner was rejected on merit and no fresh ground is made out
for grant of bail to the petitioner. He further submits that the
petitioner is involved in 23 criminal cases and is a habitual
criminal, therefore, the petitioner does not deserves the privilege
of regular bail.
6. Having considered the facts and circumstances of
the case and earlier the bail petition of the petitioner was
rejected on merit as well as the submission on behalf of
petitioner that the case is fixed for judgment, this Court is not
inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the bail
petition of the petitioner is dismissed.
(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J)
Ritik/-
U T
[ad_2]
Source link