[ad_1]
Patna High Court – Orders
Lorik Das vs The State Of Bihar on 13 August, 2025
Author: Prabhat Kumar Singh
Bench: Prabhat Kumar Singh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40655 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-390 Year-2022 Thana- BAGHA District- West Champaran
======================================================
1. Lorik Das son of Late Bhukhal Das village- Khora Parasa, Ps- Bagaha, Dist-
West champaran
2. Raghaw Das @ Raghaw Prasad Das son of Late Bhukhal Das village- Khora
Parasa, Ps- Bagaha, Dist- West champaran
3. Sangita Devi wife of Lorik Das village- Khora Parasa, Ps- Bagaha, Dist-
West champaran
4. Pooja Kumari Daughter of Lorik Das village- Khora Parasa, Ps- Bagaha,
Dist- West champaran
... ... Petitioners
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Prithvi Nath Mishra, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Vinod Shanker Modi, A.P.P.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
ORAL ORDER
3 13-08-2025
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the
State.
2. Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for
the offence punishable under sections 341, 323, 379, 354,
504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per the prosecution case, when the informant
was constructing house under PM Awas Scheme, all the FIR
named accused persons including these petitioners came there
and assaulted informant and her family members with lathi,
danda. Accused persons demanded Rs.2 lacs as extortion money
and also tried to outrage modesty of informant. They took away
gold ornaments, clothes and cash Rs.50,000/- from her house.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40655 of 2025(3) dt.13-08-2025
2/2
4. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that
parties are pattidar and it was informant who was constructing
the house on the land of these petitioners and when it was
protested, a simple marpit took place between them in which
both sides sustained injuries. There is case and counter case.
Doctor has found simple injury. Petitioners claim clean
antecedent.
5. Considering the aforesaid facts of the case, prayer
for bail of all the petitioners is allowed. In the event of
arrest/surrender within eight weeks from today, let these
petitioners, mentioned above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing
bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties
of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief
Judicial Magistrate I, Bagaha, West Champaran in Bagaha
Police Station Case No. 390 of 2022, subject to the conditions
laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal
Procedure.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
Shashi
U T
[ad_2]
Source link