M/S. Bhr Paints And Hardware Rep By … vs M/S. Amar Trading House on 26 May, 2025

0
3

This is an accused’s appeal filed under Section 374(3)

of Cr.P.C., seeking to set aside the impugned judgment of

conviction and order of sentence dated 19.11.2022 passed

in C.C.22174/2022 on the file of XXXVIII Addl. Chief

Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Bengaluru, for the offence

punishable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act

(hereinafter referred to as ‘The Act’ for brevity) and to

acquit him for the said offence by allowing this appeal, in

the ends of justice.

2. For the sake of convenience, the rank of the parties

is referred as referred before the trial court.

3 Crl. A.246/2023

3. Before adverting to the grounds urged by the

appellant/accused, it is necessary to note down the brief

factual scenario of the case of the complainant as stated in

the complaint is that, Complainant is engaged in the

business of manufacturing & supplying of perfumes and

essential oil products. Accused No.2 is one of the

customers to the complainant. Complainant has supplied oil

products to accused No.2, but accused No.2 has failed to

pay the amount for the same. In that regard, accused No.2

has issued cheque bearing No.527245 dated 10.05.2022 for

Rs.28,500/- in favour of the complainant firm which is drawn

on The Jammu & Kashmir Bank Ltd., Bengaluru Branch. As

per the instructions of accused No.2, complainant firm

presented the aforesaid cheque for encashment through its

banker. However, said cheque came to be dishonoured

with an endorsement “payment stopped by the drawer”. To

that effect, complainant firm received cheque return memo

from its banker on 11.05.2022. Complainant firm informed

the said fact to accused No.2 and also got issued legal
4 Crl. A.246/2023

notice by way of RPAD to the accused on 30.05.2022.

However, said noticed was refused by the accused No.2 and

returned on 02.06.2022. Further, accused No.2 failed to

repay the cheque amount. Accused No.2 has intentionally

given instructions to stop payment to his banker with an

intention to dishonour the cheque. Hence, without any

alternative, complainant was forced to present this private

complaint against the accused under Section 200 Cr.P.C.,

for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Act.



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here