M/S Kendriya Bhandar vs Atlantis Agritech Private Limited. on 11 June, 2025

0
27

[ad_1]

Telangana High Court

M/S Kendriya Bhandar vs Atlantis Agritech Private Limited. on 11 June, 2025

     THE HON'BLE JUSTICE MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA
                         AND
      THE HON'BLE JUSTICE B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO

         CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.1591 OF 2025

Mr. Avinash Desai, learned Senior Counsel representing Mr. M. Pranav, learned
counsel appearing for the petitioner.

Mr. A. Venkatesh, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the respondent No.1.


ORDER:

(Per Hon’ble Justice Moushumi Bhattacharya)

1. This Court had passed an ex parte order on the petition

filed by the petitioner/Award-debtor against the docket order

dated 01.04.2025 by which the Commercial Court had returned

the petitioner’s application filed under section 34 of The

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (‘1996 Act’) for

non-compliance of section 19 of the Micro, Small and Medium

Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (‘2006 Act’).

2. The Court had granted limited stay of execution of the

Award till the respondents are served with a copy of the present

Civil Revision Petition (CRP) and an opportunity to argue their

case.

3. Learned Senior Counsel appearing for the respondent

No.1/Award-holder urges that the Court could not have passed

any interim protection in favour of the petitioner/Award-debtor

when there has been an admitted non-compliance of the

statutory mandate under section 19 of the 2006 Act. Senior
Counsel submits that although the Award was made on

10.06.2024 and the section 34 was filed on 11.11.2024, the

Award-holder has been deprived of the fruits of the Award.

4. We have also heard learned Senior Counsel appearing for

the Award-debtor who has placed the relevant facts in

justification of the Award-debtor’s conduct preceding the present

CRP. Although we are alive to the strict statutory mandate of the

Award-debtor to put in 75% of the awarded amount along with

the filing of a challenge to the Award under section 19 of the

2006 Act, we cannot ignore the fact that the Award-debtor has

lived with the order passed by us on 02.05.2025 for almost 6

weeks. We therefore deem it fit to direct the Commercial Court

to number the section 34 petition filed by the

Award-debtor/petitioner herein to file an application for

compliance of section 19 of the 2006 Act by 16.06.2025.

5. The Commercial Court will consider the application for

compliance in terms of the objective of the 2006 Act along with

any other prayer made by the parties and will decide the same as

early as possible upon notice to the Award-holder.

6. We record the submission made by learned Senior Counsel

appearing for the Award-holder that the Award-holder will not

take any steps in C.P.No.29 of 2024 till 17.06.2025.

7. Since nothing further remains to be decided,

C.R.P.No.1591 of 2025, along with all connected applications, is

accordingly disposed of.

Interim orders, if any, shall stand vacated. There shall be

no order as to costs.

_________________________________
MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA, J

_____________________________
B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO, J

Date: 11.06.2025
Note: Furnish C.C. today.

(B/o)
NDS/SUS

[ad_2]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here