M/S.Shrinithi Capital Private Ltd vs L.Laveen on 3 July, 2025

0
2

Madras High Court

M/S.Shrinithi Capital Private Ltd vs L.Laveen on 3 July, 2025

Author: Abdul Quddhose

Bench: Abdul Quddhose

                                                                                       Arb Appln No.729 of 2025


                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
                                                 DATED: 03-07-2025
                                                      CORAM
                                  THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
                                              Arb. Appln. No.729 of 2025


                     1 M/s.Shrinithi Capital Private Ltd.,
                       Represented by its Chief manager
                       Mr.R.Selvam,
                       at 2nd Floor, 2A Mookambika Complex,
                       No.4, Lady Desika Road, Mylapore,
                       Chennai 600 004.

                     2     M/s.Hinduja Leyland Finance,
                           Represented by its Area manager:Mr.Ashok
                           No.1, Sardar Patel Road, Guindy,
                           Chennai 600 032.
                                                                                                  Applicants
                                                                Vs
                     1. L.Laveen

                     2. Mayfair Trans Tech
                        Limited Liability Partner,
                        No.74, Sathyadev Avenue, RA Puram,
                        Chennai 600 028.

                     3. Eshwar
                                                                                               Respondents

                     Prayer: Arbitration Application is filed under Order XIV Rule 8 of
                     O.S.Rules r/w. Section 9 (ii) (b) and (e) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act,
                     1996, praying to appoint an Advocate Commissioner with direction to seize
                     the Schedule mentioned Vehicle which is lying under the custody of the


                     1/6




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis              ( Uploaded on: 12/08/2025 04:27:27 pm )
                                                                                            Arb Appln No.729 of 2025


                     Respondents or his men, agent, Servants or anyone claiming under them
                     from the premises of 1st Respondent at No.111A Gurubavan Kovil Street,
                     Aparana Nagar, Tiruvallur – 600 077, or at any other place where the
                     scheduled asset is found, with the police aid and by breaking open locks if
                     necessary and to take the same into his custody and sell the same at fair
                     market price.

                     For Applicants:
                                              Mr.K Sendurpandi

                                                            ORDER

As directed by this Court, the applicants have effected Substituted

Service on the Respondents 1 to 3 by effecting paper publication. The

paper publication has been enclosed along with the Affidavit of service.

Hence, the Respondents 1 to 3 are set exparte by this Court.

2. The respondents are defaulters in repayment of the loan to the

applicants. The loan agreement dated 29.07.2023 empowers the applicants

to repossess the vehicle from the respondents in case the respondents

commit default in repayment of the loan. As on 22.04.2025, a sum of

Rs.15,92,055/- is due and payable by the respondents to the applicants, as is

seen from the statement of account filed along with this application. As on

the date of filing of the application, the respondents are in arrears of

2/6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 12/08/2025 04:27:27 pm )
Arb Appln No.729 of 2025

Rs.13,38,100/- as is seen from the affidavit filed in support of the petition.

3. The applicants have expressed their difficulty to appoint the

Advocate Commissioner on its own. They have also expressed their

willingness to go for arbitration in accordance with arbitration clause

contained in the loan agreement, dated 29.07.2023. The applicants have

already recalled the loan of the respondents. This Court after giving due

consideration to the contents of the affidavit filed in support of the

application, is of the considered view, a prima facie case has been made out

by the applicants for the appointment of an Advocate Commissioner by this

Court to repossess the vehicle from the respondents or wherever available.

To enable the respondents to take back possession of the vehicle from the

Advocate Commissioner, they must be put on terms for getting back the

vehicle from the applicants after re-possession. In order to strike a balance,

the following order is passed by this Court:

a) Mr.Francis Cedric D’Cruz, Advocate, having office at No.19, Law

Chambers, High Court Buildings, Chennai – 600 104 (Mob.

No.9841047636) is appointed as the Advocate Commissioner to re-posses

the vehicle, morefully described in the schedule to the Judges Summons

3/6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 12/08/2025 04:27:27 pm )
Arb Appln No.729 of 2025

from the respondents from their premises or wherever available;

b)The Advocate Commissioner, after re-possessing the vehicle, shall

handover interim custody of the same to the applicants, who shall keep it in

their safe custody;

c)The Advocate Commissioner, immediately after re-possessing the

subject vehicle, shall intimate the respondents either through Registered

Post with Acknowledgment Due (RPAD) or by hand delivery through a

written communication that the arrears of installments work out to

Rs.15,92,055/-;

d)The respondents, on payment of Rs.15,92,055/- to the applicants

within a period of three days from the date when the subject vehicle was re-

possessed, is entitled for return of the seized vehicle. On receipt of the sum

of Rs.15,92,055/- within the stipulated time as stated supra, the applicants

shall re-deliver the subject vehicle back to the respondents with proper

acknowledgment and the advocate commissioner shall also render proper

assistance for the same;

4/6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 12/08/2025 04:27:27 pm )
Arb Appln No.729 of 2025

e)The applicants shall initiate arbitration in accordance with the

arbitration agreement contained in the contract within a period of 90 days

from today. In case, the applicants fail to initiate arbitration within the

stipulated time, the order passed by this Court today shall stand

automatically vacated and the re-possessed vehicle shall also be redelivered

back to the respondents by the applicants unconditionally;

f)In case, the Advocate Commissioner requires Police assistance due

to any law and order problem or due to any obstruction caused by the

respondents or by any third party, while re-possessing the vehicle, the

advocate commissioner is at liberty to seek police assistance from the

concerned police station and the police department shall grant police

protection accordingly. In case, break open of the premises, where the

vehicle is located, is required, the Advocate Commissioner shall break open

the premises in the presence of the police and take an inventory and

thereafter re-posses the vehicle;

ABDUL QUDDHOSE,J.,

5/6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 12/08/2025 04:27:27 pm )
Arb Appln No.729 of 2025

vum

g)The Advocate Commissioner shall be paid an initial remuneration

of Rs.25,000/- and on receipt of the same, the advocate commissioner shall

proceed to execute this order. All the boarding, lodging and travelling

expenses for the Advocate Commissioner shall be borne by the applicants.

4. With the aforesaid directions, this application stands disposed of

.

5. Post the matter for reporting compliance on 07.08.2025.

03-07-2025
vum

Arb. Appln. No.729 of 2025

6/6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 12/08/2025 04:27:27 pm )



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here