Machhinder Singh vs . Jaiwanti &#038; Ors. on 25 July, 2025

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:57 :::CIS
Tasi Phunchog vs. CBI

(reena)

Cr. Appeal No.419 of 2023

21.12.2023 Present: Mr. Sambhav Bhasin, Advocate, for the
appellant.

Mr. A.K. Bansal, Advocate, for the
respondent/CBI.

Cr.MP No.3523 of 2023

The present application has been filed under

Section 389 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.) for

suspension of sentence during pendency of the present

appeal.

I have heard the learned counsel for the parties

and also gone through the material available on record. Vide

judgment of conviction dated 23.07.2022 and order of

sentence dated 03.08.2022, passed by the learned Special

Judge, (CBI), Shimla, District Shimla, H.P., the present

applicant-appellant has been convicted as under:

i) For commission of the offences punishable under
Sections 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption
Act, 1988, punishable under Section 13(2) read with
Section 120-B of IPC and sentenced to under
rigorous imprisonment for a period of three years
and to pay a fine of Rs.30,000/- and in case of
default of payment of fine, to further undergo
rigorous imprisonment for a term of six months;

ii) to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of
three years and a fine of Rs.10,000/- for commission
of the offence punishable under Section 420 of IPC
read with Section 120-B of IPC and in case of
default of payment of fine, to further undergo
rigourous imprisonment for a terms of six month;

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:57 :::CIS

iii) to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of
three years and a fine of Rs.10,000/- for the

.

commission of offence under Section 467 of IPC

read with Section 120-B of IPC ad in case of default
of payment of fine, to further undergo rigorous
imprisonment for a term of six months;

iv) to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of
three years an a fine of Rs.10,000/- for the
commission of offence under Section 468 of IPC

read with Section 120-B and in case of default of
payment of fine, to further undergo rigorous
imprisonment for a term of six month and;

(v) to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of
r one year and a fine of Rs.10,000/- for the
commission of offence under Section 471 of IPC

read with Section 120-B of IPC and in case of
default of payment of fine, to further undergo
rigorous imprisonment for a term of six months.

Keeping in view the fact that the main appeal

stands admitted for hearing, it is ordered that the substantive

sentence imposed upon the applicant-appellant, vide

judgment of conviction dated 23.07.2022 and order of

sentence dated 03.08.2022, passed by the learned Special

Judge, (CBI), Shimla, District Shimla, H.P.,, shall remain

suspended, till final disposal of the appeal, however, subject

to the applicant’s furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs.

50,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction

of learned trial Court and also depositing the fine amount, if

not already deposited, within a period of four weeks from

today, undertaking therein to appear in the Court as and when

directed and in the event of the dismissal of the appeal, the

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:57 :::CIS
applicant will surrender before the Court to undergo sentence,

if any, imposed by the Court.

The application stands disposed of.

Cr. Appeal No. 419 of 2023

Since the appeal already stands admitted,

therefore, list for final hearing in due course.

( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:57 :::CIS
Tasi Phunchog vs. CBI

(reena)

Cr. Appeal No.417 of 2023

21.12.2023 Present: Mr. Sambhav Bhasin, Advocate, for the
appellant.

Mr. A.K. Bansal, Advocate, for the
respondent/CBI.

Cr.MP No.3520 of 2023

The present application has been filed under

Section 389 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.) for

suspension of sentence during pendency of the present

appeal.

I have heard the learned counsel for the parties

and also gone through the material available on record. Vide

judgment of conviction dated 23.07.2022 and order of

sentence dated 03.08.2022, passed by the learned Special

Judge, (CBI), Shimla, District Shimla, H.P., the present

applicant-appellant has been convicted as under:

i) For commission of the offences punishable under
Sections 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption
Act, 1988, punishable under Section 13(2) read with
Section 120-B of IPC and sentenced to under
rigorous imprisonment for a period of three years
and to pay a fine of Rs.60,000/- and in case of
default of payment of fine, to further undergo
rigorous imprisonment for a term of six months;

ii) to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of
three years and a fine of Rs.10,000/- for commission
of the offence punishable under Section 420 of IPC
read with Section 120-B of IPC and in case of
default of payment of fine, to further undergo
rigorous imprisonment for a terms of six month;

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:57 :::CIS

iii) to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of
three years and a fine of Rs.10,000/- for the

.

commission of offence under Section 467 of IPC

read with Section 120-B of IPC ad in case of default
of payment of fine, to further undergo rigorous
imprisonment for a term of six months;

iv) to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of
three years an a fine of Rs.10,000/- for the
commission of offence under Section 468 of IPC

read with Section 120-B and in case of default of
payment of fine, to further undergo rigorous
imprisonment for a term of six month and;

(v) to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of
r one year and a fine of Rs.10,000/- for the

commission of offence under Section 471 of IPC
read with Section 120-B of IPC and in case of
default of payment of fine, to further undergo
rigorous imprisonment for a term of six months.

Keeping in view the fact that the main appeal

stands admitted for hearing, it is ordered that the substantive

sentence imposed upon the applicant-appellant, vide

judgment of conviction dated 23.07.2022 and order of

sentence dated 03.08.2022, passed by the learned Special

Judge, (CBI), Shimla, District Shimla, H.P.,, shall remain

suspended, till final disposal of the appeal, however, subject

to the applicant’s furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs.

50,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction

of learned trial Court and also depositing the fine amount, if

not already deposited, within a period of four weeks from

today, undertaking therein to appear in the Court as and when

directed and in the event of the dismissal of the appeal, the

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:57 :::CIS
applicant will surrender before the Court to undergo sentence,

if any, imposed by the Court.

The application stands disposed of.

Cr. Appeal No. 417 of 2023

Since the appeal already stands admitted,

therefore, list for final hearing in due course.

( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:57 :::CIS
Tasi Phunchog vs. CBI

(reena)

Cr. Appeal No.399 of 2023

21.12.2023 Present: Mr. Sambhav Bhasin, Advocate, for the
appellant.

Mr. A.K. Bansal, Advocate, for the
respondent/CBI.

Cr.MP No.3238 of 2023

The present application has been filed under

Section 389 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.) for

suspension of sentence during pendency of the present

appeal.

I have heard the learned counsel for the parties

and also gone through the material available on record. Vide

judgment of conviction dated 15.06.2022 and order of

sentence dated 25.08.2022, passed by the learned Special

Judge, (CBI), Shimla, District Shimla, H.P., the present

applicant-appellant has been convicted as under:

i) For commission of the offences punishable under
Sections 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption
Act, 1988, punishable under Section 13(2) read with
Section 120-B of IPC and sentenced to under
rigorous imprisonment for a period of three years
and to pay a fine of Rs.60,000/- and in case of
default of payment of fine, to further undergo
rigorous imprisonment for a term of six months;

ii) to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of
three years and a fine of Rs.10,000/- for commission
of the offence punishable under Section 420 of IPC
read with Section 120-B of IPC and in case of
default of payment of fine, to further undergo
rigorous imprisonment for a terms of six month;

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:57 :::CIS

iii) to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of
three years and a fine of Rs.10,000/- for the

.

commission of offence under Section 467 of IPC

read with Section 120-B of IPC ad in case of default
of payment of fine, to further undergo rigorous
imprisonment for a term of six months;

iv) to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of
three years an a fine of Rs.10,000/- for the
commission of offence under Section 468 of IPC

read with Section 120-B and in case of default of
payment of fine, to further undergo rigorous
imprisonment for a term of six month and;

(v) to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of
r one year and a fine of Rs.10,000/- for the

commission of offence under Section 471 of IPC
read with Section 120-B of IPC and in case of
default of payment of fine, to further undergo
rigorous imprisonment for a term of six months.

Keeping in view the fact that the main appeal

stands admitted for hearing, it is ordered that the substantive

sentence imposed upon the applicant-appellant, vide

judgment of conviction dated 15.06.2022 and order of

sentence dated 25.08.2022, passed by the learned Special

Judge, (CBI), Shimla, District Shimla, H.P., shall remain

suspended, till final disposal of the appeal, however, subject

to the applicant’s furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs.

50,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction

of learned trial Court and also depositing the fine amount, if

not already deposited, within a period of four weeks from

today, undertaking therein to appear in the Court as and when

directed and in the event of the dismissal of the appeal, the

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:57 :::CIS
applicant will surrender before the Court to undergo sentence,

if any, imposed by the Court.

The application stands disposed of.

Cr. Appeal No. 399 of 2023

Since the appeal already stands admitted,

r to
therefore, list for final hearing in due course.

( Sushil Kukreja )

Judge

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:57 :::CIS
Tasi Phunchog vs. CBI

Cr. Appeal No.482 of 2023

21.12.2023 Present: Mr. Sambhav Bhasin, Advocate, for the
appellant.

Mr. A.K. Bansal, Advocate, for the
respondent/CBI.

Cr.MP No.4023 of 2023

The present application has been filed under

Section 389 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.) for

suspension of sentence during pendency of the present

appeal.

I have heard the learned counsel for the parties

and also gone through the material available on record. Vide

judgment of conviction dated 15.07.2022 and order of

sentence dated 03.08.2022, passed by the learned Special

Judge, (CBI), Shimla, District Shimla, H.P., the present

applicant-appellant has been convicted as under:

i) For commission of the offences punishable under
Sections 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption
Act, 1988, punishable under Section 13(2) read with
Section 120-B of IPC and sentenced to under
rigorous imprisonment for a period of three years
and to pay a fine of Rs.60,000/- and in case of
default of payment of fine, to further undergo
rigorous imprisonment for a term of six months;

ii) to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of
three years and a fine of Rs.10,000/- for commission
of the offence punishable under Section 420 of IPC
read with Section 120-B of IPC and in case of
default of payment of fine, to further undergo
rigorous imprisonment for a terms of six month;

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:57 :::CIS

iii) to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of
three years and a fine of Rs.10,000/- for the

.

commission of offence under Section 467 of IPC

read with Section 120-B of IPC ad in case of default
of payment of fine, to further undergo rigorous
imprisonment for a term of six months;

iv) to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of
three years an a fine of Rs.10,000/- for the
commission of offence under Section 468 of IPC

read with Section 120-B and in case of default of
payment of fine, to further undergo rigorous
imprisonment for a term of six month and;

(v) to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of
r one year and a fine of Rs.10,000/- for the

commission of offence under Section 471 of IPC
read with Section 120-B of IPC and in case of
default of payment of fine, to further undergo
rigorous imprisonment for a term of six months.

Keeping in view the fact that the main appeal

stands admitted for hearing, it is ordered that the substantive

sentence imposed upon the applicant-appellant, vide

judgment of conviction dated 15.07.2022 and order of

sentence dated 03.08.2022, passed by the learned Special

Judge, (CBI), Shimla, District Shimla, H.P.,, shall remain

suspended, till final disposal of the appeal, however, subject

to the applicant’s furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs.

50,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction

of learned trial Court and also depositing the fine amount, if

not already deposited, within a period of four weeks from

today, undertaking therein to appear in the Court as and when

directed and in the event of the dismissal of the appeal, the

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:57 :::CIS
applicant will surrender before the Court to undergo sentence,

if any, imposed by the Court.

The application stands disposed of.

Cr. Appeal No. 482 of 2023

Since the appeal already stands admitted,

r to
therefore, list for final hearing in due course.

( Sushil Kukreja )

Judge

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:57 :::CIS
Tasi Phunchog vs. CBI

Cr. Appeal No.480 of 2023

21.12.2023 Present: Mr. Sambhav Bhasin, Advocate, for the
appellant.

Mr. A.K. Bansal, Advocate, for the
respondent/CBI.

Cr.MP No.4019 of 2023

The present application has been filed under

Section 389 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.) for

suspension of sentence during pendency of the present

appeal.

I have heard the learned counsel for the parties

and also gone through the material available on record. Vide

judgment of conviction dated 24.11.2022 and order of

sentence dated 28.11.2022, passed by the learned Special

Judge, (CBI), Shimla, District Shimla, H.P., the present

applicant-appellant has been convicted as under:

i) For commission of the offences punishable under
Sections 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption
Act, 1988, punishable under Section 13(2) read with
Section 120-B of IPC and sentenced to under
rigorous imprisonment for a period of three years
and to pay a fine of Rs.50,000/- and in case of
default of payment of fine, to further undergo
rigorous imprisonment for a term of six months;

ii) to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of
three years and a fine of Rs.10,000/- for commission
of the offence punishable under Section 420 of IPC
read with Section 120-B of IPC and in case of
default of payment of fine, to further undergo
rigourous imprisonment for a terms of six month;

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS

iii) to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of
three years and a fine of Rs.10,000/- for the

.

commission of offence under Section 467 of IPC

read with Section 120-B of IPC ad in case of default
of payment of fine, to further undergo rigorous
imprisonment for a term of six months;

iv) to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of
three years an a fine of Rs.10,000/- for the
commission of offence under Section 468 of IPC
read with Section 120-B and in case of default of

payment of fine, to further undergo rigourous
imprisonment for a term of six month and;

(v) to undergo rigourous imprisonment for a period of
r one year and a fine of Rs.10,000/- for the
commission of offence under Section 471 of IPC

read with Section 120-B of IPC and in case of
default of payment of fine, to further undergo
rigourous imprisonment for a term of three months.

Keeping in view the fact that the main appeal

stands admitted for hearing, it is ordered that the substantive

sentence imposed upon the applicant-appellant, vide

judgment of conviction dated 24.11.2022 and order of

sentence dated 28.11.2022, passed by the learned Special

Judge, (CBI), Shimla, District Shimla, H.P.,, shall remain

suspended, till final disposal of the appeal, however, subject

to the applicant’s furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs.

50,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction

of learned trial Court and also depositing the fine amount, if

not already deposited, within a period of four weeks from

today, undertaking therein to appear in the Court as and when

directed and in the event of the dismissal of the appeal, the

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
applicant will surrender before the Court to undergo sentence,

if any, imposed by the Court.

The application stands disposed of.

Cr. Appeal No. 480 of 2023

Since the appeal already stands admitted,

r to
therefore, list for final hearing in due course.

( Sushil Kukreja )

Judge

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
Purkhu Ram vs. CBI

Cr. Appeal No.235 of 2023

21.12.2023 Present: Mr. Dinesh Kumar, Advocate, for the
appellant.

Mr. A.K. Bansal, Advocate, for the
respondent.

Cr.MP No.1996 of 2023

Learned counsel for the applicant/appellant

prays for and is granted two weeks’ further time to seek

instruction in the matter.

As prayed, list on 09.01.2024.

( Sushil Kukreja )

Judge

21st December, 2023

(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
Kartar Chand vs. Jhonfi Ram

RSA No.123 of 2023

21.12.2023 Present: Mr. I.S. Chandel, Advocate, for the appellant.

Ms. Aanchal Sharma, Advocate, for the
respondent.

CMP No.7063 of 2023

r to
Reply stands filed.

Heard. Having regard to the averments made in

the application, which are duly supported with an affidavit of

applicant Kartar Chand, the present application is allowed and

the execution of the impugned judgment and decree dated

03.10.2019, passed by learned Senior Civil Judge, Nadaun,

District Hamirpur, H.P. in Civil Suit No.232 of 2013, titled

Jhonfi Ram vs. Kartar Chand and further affirmed by learned

Additional District Judge, Hamirpur, H.P. vide judgment dated

27.04.2022 in Civil Appeal No.55 of 2019, titled Kartar Chand

vs. Jhonfi Ram., shall remain stayed during the pendency of

the present appeal.

Application stands disposed of.

RSA No.123 of 2023

As prayed, list this matter for hearing in the

month of March, 2024.

( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge

21st December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
Brahmo Devi (deceased) though her LRs. &
Anr. vs. Jagdish Chand and Ors.

RSA No.58 of 2023

21.12.2023 Present: Mr. Sanjay Jaswal, Advocate, for the

appellants.

None for the respondents.

RSA No.58 of 2023 & CMP No.2236 of 2023

Since none has appeared on behalf of the

respondents despite repeated calls, in the interest of

justice, list after four weeks.

( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge

21st December, 2023

(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
Subhash Chander vs. State of H.P.

RSA No.221 of 2023

21.12.2023 Present: Mr. H.S. Rana, Advocate, for the appellant.

Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate
General, for the respondent/State.

Learned counsel for the appellant prays for

r to
adjournment to inspect the record.

As prayed, list after six weeks.

( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge

21st December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
Jogindr Singh vs. Bhajna (deceased) through
his LRs and Ors.

RSA No.509 of 2009

21.12.2023 Present: Mr. Tara Singh Chauhan, Advocate, for the

appellant.

Mr.Divya Raj Singh, Advocate, for respondents
No.1(a) to 1(d).

Respondents No.2(c) to 2(d), 3(a) t 3(d) already
ex parte.

CMP(M) Nos. 842, 843 & 845 of 2023

Learned counsel for the applicant/appellant

prays for adjournment.

As prayed, list after four weeks.

( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge

21st December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
Parshotam Lal vs. Chiri Devi (deceased)
through her LRs.

CMP(M) No.1140 of 2021

21.12.2023 Present: Ms. Sharmila Patial, Advocate, for the

applicant/appellant.

Mr. Shubham Sharma, Advocate, for proposed
LRs of respondent No.1(b).

LR. No.1(a) already ex parte.

Learned counsel for the applicant/appellant

submits that since she has been appointed as Additional

Advocate General, therefore, she has returned the case

file to the H.P. High Court Legal Services Committee.

Let report be called for from the Secretary,

H.P High Court Legal Services Committee in this respect.

List after two weeks.

( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge

21st December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
Jaspal & Ors. vs. Nanak Chand & Ors.

RSA No.122 of 2023

21.12.2023 Present: Mr. Desh Raj Thakur, Advocate, for the
appellants.

Mr. Karan Singh Kanwar, Advocate, for the
respondents.

RSA No.122 of 2023

At the joint request of learned counsel for the

parties, list for hearing on admission in the month of

March, 2024.

CMP No.6882 of 2023

List alongwith main appeal for consideration.

( Sushil Kukreja )

Judge

21st December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
Sadiq Mohammed vs. State of H.P.

Cr.MP(M) No.2921 of 2023

21.12.2023 Present: None for the petitioner.

Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate
General, for the respondent/State.

ASI Yashpal Singh, P.S. Kihar, present with
record.

r to
Fresh status report stands filed.

Since none has appeared on behalf of the

petitioner despite repeated calls, in the interest of justice,

list on 28.12.2023.

( Sushil Kukreja )

Judge

21st December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
Vijay Kumar vs. Anil Kumar

RSA No.213 of 2022

21.12.2023 Present: Mr. Surender K. Sharma, Advocate, for the
appellant.

Mr. Vinod Thakur, Advocate, for respondents
No.1 to 4.

None for respondents No.5 to 7.

r to
At the joint request of learned counsel for the

parties, list for hearing on admission in the month of

March, 2024.

( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge

21st December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
HIMUDA & Anr. vs. M/s Maria Enterprises

Arbitration Appeal No.4 of 2019

21.12.2023 Present: Mr. Dikken Kumar, Advocate vice Mr. Ajay
Vaidya, Advocate, for the petitioners.

Mr. Sumeet Raj Sharma, Advocate, for the
respondent.

At the joint request of learned counsel for the

parties, list on 19.03.2024.

( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge

21st December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
OIC vs. Shridhar & Ors. a/w connected
matters.

FAO No.9 of 2015 a/w FAOs No.19, 20, 21 & 22

of 2015

21.12.2023 Present: Mr. Ishan Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant(s)
in all the appeals.

Mr. Adarsh Sharma, Advocate, for
respondents No.1 to 3/Claimants.

rNo.4.

Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate, for respondent

Learned counsel for respondents No.1 to

3/claimants prays for adjournment.

As prayed, list on 11.01.2024.

( Sushil Kukreja )

Judge

21st December, 2023

(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
Arun Chadha & others vs. The Municipal
Council Dharamshala.

RSA No. 549 of 2008

21.12.2023 Present: Mr. Peeyush Verma, Advocate, for appellants

No.1 to 9.

Ms. Divya Pathania, Advocate Vice Mr. Adarsh K.
Vashista, Advocate, for the respondent.

r to
CMP No.14857 of 2023

Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of

the respondent prays for and is granted four weeks’

further time to file reply. List thereafter.

( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge

21st December, 2023

(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
Dharam Singh and Ors. vs. Bihri Lal and Ors.

RSA No. 496 of 2009

21.12.2023 Present: Ms. Aanchal Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Viks
Rathore, Advocate, for the appellants.

Mr. Raman Sethi, Advocate, for the proposed
LRs No.1(a) to 1(c) of deceased respondent
Bihari Lal.

r to
CMP Nos.833 & 834 of 2019

Learned counsel for proposed LRs No.1(a) to

1(c) of deceased respondent Bihari Lal, prays for and is

granted four weeks’ further time to file reply. List

thereafter.

( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge

21st December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
Devinder Singh vs. Rajesh Kumar Sharma &
Ors.

RSA No. 548 of 2009

21.12.2023 Present: Ms.Pooja Verma, Advocate vice Mr.

Devender Sharma, Advocate, for the
appellant.

Dr. Lalit K. Sharma, Advocate, for respondents
No.1.

r to
Name of respondent No.2, already stands
deleted vide order dated 29.09.2011.

Respondent No.3, already ex parte.

Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of the

appellant prays for adjournment to verify the status of the

parties as the appeal has come up for hearing after a period

of seven years.

As prayed, list after four weeks.

( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
National Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Radha
Devi & Ors.

FAO No.256 of 2015

21.12.2023 Present: Dr. Lalit K. Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.

Mr. Anand Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr.
Karan Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.1.

Ms. Leena Guleria, Advocate, for respondents

No.2 to 4.

CMP No.18823 of 2023

Heard. Having regard to the averments made in

the application, which are duly supported with an affidavit of

Applicant/respondent No.1, Radha Devi, the same is allowed.

Application stands disposed of.

FAO No.256 of 2015

List this appeal for final hearing on 08.01.2024.

( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge

21st December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
Bhagat Ram (deceased) through his LRs vs.
Rama Nand (deceased) through his LRs.

RSA No.573 of 2019

21.12.2023 Present: Mr. Sumesh Sharma, Advocate Vice Mr. Karun

Negi, Advocate, for the appellants.

Respondents No.1(a) to 1(f), 2(a), 2(c) and 2(d),
already ex parte.

Mr. Pranjal Munjal, Advocate Vice Mr. Janesh
Gupta, Advocate, for respondents No.2(e) and
r2(f), 3,4,6 & 7.

Respondent No.2(g) stands deleted.

As per report of the Registry, steps for the

service of respondent No.2(b) have not been taken.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

appellants undertakes to do the needful within a period of

one week. List thereafter.

( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge

21st December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
Jaggu Vs. State of H.P.

Cr. Appeal No.114 of 2022

21.12.2023 Present: Mr. Kishore Pundir, Advocate, as Legal Aid
Counsel, for the appellant.

Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate
General, for the respondent.

Cr.MP No.4039 of 2023

r Custody Certificate stands filed.

Learned Additional Advocate General prays for

adjournment.

As prayed, list on 04.03.2024.

( Sushil Kukreja )

Judge

Lal Chand and another vs. Ram Charan
and others.

(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
Jhabe Ram vs. Sunder (decesed) through his
LRs and Anr.

RSA No.386 of 2022

21.12.2023 Present: Mr. Sudhir Bhatnagar, Advocate, for the

appellant.

Mr. Jiya Lal Thakur, Advocate Vice Mr.
G.R.Palsra,Advocate, for respondents No.1(i) to
1(iv).

rNo.2.

Mr. Jitender P. Ranote, Advocate, for respondent

RSA No.386 of 2022

As prayed, list this appeal for hearing on

admission in the month of March, 2024.

CMP No.18001 of 2022

List for consideration alongwith main appeal.

( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge

21st December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
NHAI vs. Ghantha Ram

OMP(M) No.125 of 2023

21.12.2023 Present: Ms. Shreya Chauhan, Advocate, for the
applicant.

Mr. Varun Rana, Advocate, for the respondent.

Learned counsel representing the respondent

prays for and is granted four weeks’ time to file Power of

Attorney on behalf of the respondent as well as to move an

appropriate application for setting aside the ex parte order,

dated 24.11.2023. List thereafter.

( Sushil Kukreja )

Judge

21st December, 2023

(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
NHAI vs. Lal Singh

OMP(M) No.124 of 2023

21.12.2023 Present: Ms. Shreya Chauhan, Advocate, for the
applicant.

Mr. Varun Rana, Advocate, for the respondent.

Learned counsel representing the respondent

prays for and is granted four weeks’ time to file Power of

Attorney on behalf of the respondent as well as to move an

appropriate application for setting aside the ex parte order,

dated 24.11.2023. List thereafter.

( Sushil Kukreja )

Judge

21st December, 2023

(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
Deen Sahayk Trust & Ors. vs. Subhash Chand
Malhotra & Ors.

RSA No.193 of 2023

21.12.2023 Present: Mr. Ajay Kumar Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr.
Rohit, Advocate, for the appellants.

Mr. Bhupender Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr.
Janesh Gupta and Mr. Pranjal Munjal,
Advocates, for respondents No.1,2 & 4 to 6.

Mr. Varun Chauhan, Advocate, for respondents
No.3(a) to 3(c).

CMP No.16785 of 2023

No reply is intended to be filed to the instant

application.

Heard. The parties are directed to maintain

status quo qua ownership, nature and possession of the suit

property during the pendency of the present appeal, however,

subject to alteration, vacation or modification on motion.

Application stands disposed of.

RSA No.193/2023 & Cross Objection
No.17/2023

As prayed, list for hearing on admission after

ensuing winter vacations.

( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge

21st December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
Ram Charan & Ors. vs. Lal Chand & Anr.

CMP(M) No.1256 of

2023

21.12.2023 Present: Mr. Peeyush Verma, Advocate, for the

applicants/appellants.

Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr.
Pranjal Munjal, Advocate, for the

respondents.

CMP(M) No.1256 of 2023

Heard. Having regard to the averments

made in the application, which are duly supported with

an affidavit of the applicant Ram Charan, the same is

allowed and delay of 67 days in filing the appeal is

hereby condoned.

Application stands disposed of.

RSA No.294 of 2023

Heard. Admit on the substantial questions of law

No.1 & 2, formulated at Page No.7of the paper book.

Post Admission Notice.

Mr. Pranjal Munjal, learned counsel, appears

and waives service of post admission notice on behalf of the

respondents.

List alongwith RSA No.147 of 2023 for final

hearing in due course.

( Sushil
Kukreja )

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
Judge

     21st December, 2023





        (reena)





              r        to









                           ::: Downloaded on - 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS

RSA No.147 of 2023

21.12.2023 Present: Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr.

Pranjal Munjal, Advocate, for the appellants.

Mr. Peeyush Verma, Advocate, for the
respondents.

r to
RSA No.147 of 2023

Heard. Admit on the substantial questions of law

No.2 to 5, formulated at Page Nos.11 & 12 of the paper book.

Post Admission Notice.

Mr. Peeyush Verma, learned counsel, appears

and waives service of post admission notice on behalf of the

respondents.

List for final hearing in due course.

CMP No.8017 of 2023

Heard. Interim order dated 30.06.2023, is made

absolute during the pendency of the present appeal,

however, subject to alteration/vacation/modification on

motion.

Application stands disposed of.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
Principal Secretary Revenue & Ors. vs.
Rattan Singh & Ors.

CMP(M) No.408 of 2023

21.12.2023 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate

General, for the applicants/appellants.

Mr. Malay Kaushal, Advocate, for the
respondents.

r Heard. to
CMP(M) No.408 of 2023

Having regard to the averments

made in the application, which are duly supported with

an affidavit of the Er. Anil Kumar, the same is allowed

and delay of 64 days in filing the appeal is hereby

condoned.

Application stands disposed of.

RSA No._______of 2023

Be registered.

Notice. Mr. Malay Kaushal, learned counsel,

appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the

respondents.

Learned Additional Advocate General is

directed to supply the copy of grounds of appeal to the

respondents within two weeks. List thereafter.

CMP No._________2023

Be registered.

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS

Notice in the aforesaid terms.

Reply, if any, be filed within two weeks. List

thereafter alongwith main appeal.

( Sushil
Kukreja )

Judge

21st December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
Jagat Prakash (deceased) through his
LRs. Vs. Gopal Chander (deceased)

through his LRs.

RSA No.189 of 2023

20.12.2023 Present: Mr. K.D. Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Het
Ram Thakur, Advocate, for the appellants.

Mr. Ajay Kumar Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr.
Rohit, Advocate, for the respondents.

r to
CMP No.10668 of 2023

As per report of the Registry, security bond in

terms of order dated 18.08.2023, has been furnished to

the satisfaction of learned trial court.

Heard. Interim order dated 18.08.2023, is

made absolute during the pendency of the present

appeal.

Application stands disposed of.

RSA No.189 of 2023

As prayed, list this appeal for hearing on

admission in the month of March, 2024.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

20th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
Lal Chand vs. Mahindra & Mahindra
Financial Services Ltd.

Cr. Revision No.419 of 2023

20.12.2023 Present: Mr. Vijay Kumar Arora, Advocate, for the

petitioner.

Mr. Sahil Thakur, Advocate vice Ms. Meera
Devi, Advocate, for the respondent.

r to
Cr.MP No.4705 of 2023

No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of

the non-applicant/respondent.

Heard. Having regard to the averments

made in the application, which is duly supported with an

affidavit of the applicant/petitioner, the same is allowed

and eight weeks further time is granted to him to deposit

30% of compensation amount, in terms of order dated

18th August, 2023, passed by this Court.

Application stands disposed of.

Cr. Revision No.419 of 2023

As prayed, list after eight weeks.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

20th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
Ram Singh vs. NCB

Cr.MP(M) No.2896 of 2023

20.12.2023 Present: Mr. Maan Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Dev Raj, Advocate, for the
respondent/NCB.

Arguments heard. Judgment reserved.

                       r           to

                                                                  ( Sushil
                                            Kukreja )
                                                           Judge


             20th December, 2023
                 (reena)







                                             ::: Downloaded on - 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS

Kuldeep Verma @ Boss vs. State of H.P.

Cr.MP(M) No.2909 of 2023

20.12.2023 Present: Mr. Harish Sharma, Advocate, for the
petitioner.

Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate
General, for the respondent/State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for

adjournment.

As prayed, list on 05.01.2024.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

20th December, 2023

(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
Radhika Sharma vs. State of H.P.

Cr.MP(M) No.3184 of 2023

20.12.2023 Present: Mr. Aslam, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General,
for the respondent/State.

Notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional

Advocate General appears and waives service of notice

on behalf of the respondent/State. He prays for and is

granted one week’s time to file status report.

As prayed, list on 28.12.2023.

( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge

20th December, 2023

(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
Radhika Sharma vs. State of H.P.

Cr.MP(M) No.3184 of 2023

20.12.2023 Present: Mr. Aslam, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General,
for the respondent/State.

Notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional

Advocate General appears and waives service of notice

on behalf of the respondent/State. He prays for and is

granted one week’s time to file status report.

As prayed, list on 28.12.2023.

( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge

20th December, 2023

(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
Sanjeev Kumar & Ors. vs. Rattan Lal & Ors.

RSA No.277 of 2022

20.12.2023 Present: Mr. Tara Singh Chauhan, Advocate, for the
appellants.

Mr. Vishwas Kaushal, Advocate, for respondents
No.1 & 2.

Respondents No.3 to 8, already ex parte.

r to
RSA No.277 of 2022

Heard. Admit on the substantial questions of law

No.1,2 & 4, formulated at Page No.13 of the paper book.

Post Admission Notice.

Mr. Vishwas Kaushal, learned counsel, appears

and waives service of post admission notice on behalf of

respondents No.1 & 2.

Separate post admission notice be issued to

respondents No.3 to 8, returnable within six weeks, on taking

steps within a period of five days. List thereafter.

CMP No.13594 of 2022

Heard. Interim order dated 26.09.2022, is made

absolute during the pendency of the present appeal, however,

subject to alteration, vacation and modification on motion.

Application stands disposed of.

( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge

20th December, 2023

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
(reena)

r to

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
Jodh Singh & Anr. vs. Ramesh Chand & Anr.

RSA No.389 of 2022

20.12.2023 Present: Mr. Ajay Kumar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rohit,
Advocate, for the appellants.

Mr. Bhupender Gupta, Senior Advocate with Ms.
Rinki Kashmiri, Advocate, for the respondents.

CMP No.18132 of 2022

Learned counsel for the applicants/appellants

prays for and is granted four weeks’ further time to file

rejoinder.

As prayed, list after four weeks alongwith main

appeal.

In the meantime, interim order to continue

RSA No.389 of 2022

As prayed, list after four weeks.

( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge

20th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
Sarup Chand vs. Pawan Chibh

Cr. Appeal No.136 of 2023

20.12.2023 Present: Mr.Mukul Sood, Advocate, for the appellant.

None for the respondent.

As the name of learned counsel representing

the respondent is not reflected in the cause list, none has

appeared on his behalf.

r As prayed, list after one week.

Registry is directed to reflect the name of Mr.

Naresh Kaul, Advocate, for the respondent in the cause-list,

henceforth.

( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge

20th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
Paras Ram vs. Prem Chand & Anr.

RSA No.199 of 2023

20.12.2023 Present: Mr. Dinesh Kumar, Advocate, for the appellant.

Mr. Javed Khan, Advocate, for respondent No.1.

Mr. Ashok Kumar Sharma, Advocate, for
respondent No.2.

adjournment.

r to
Learned counsel for the appellant prays for

As prayed, list after four weeks.

( Sushil Kukreja )

Judge

20th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
Satpal vs. Kuldeep Chauhan

RSA No.110 of 2023

20.12.2023 Present: Mr. Rohit, Advocate, for the appellant.

Ms. Radhika Gautam, Advocate, for the
respondent.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

appellant prays for adjournment on the ground that

arguing counsel is pre-occupied in another Court.

As prayed, list after four weeks.

( Sushil Kukreja )

Judge

20th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
Desh Raj Gupta vs. Urmila Gupta & Ors.

FAO No.304 of 2014

15.12.2023 Present: Ms. Meera Devi, Advocate, for the appellant.

Mr. Abhishek, Advocate Vice Mr. Parmod Singh
Thakur, Advocate, for the respondent.

CMP No.13901 of 2023

By way of instant application filed by the

applicant/respondent,
r a prayer has been made for

enforcement of the order dated 17.03.2016, passed in CMP

No.11968/2015 in FAO No.304/2014, against the non-

applicant/appellant, whereby, it was mutually agreed that

appellant-husband shall in all pay a sum of Rs.8000/- per

month to the respondent-wife w.e.f. 01.03.2016 till the

disposal of the present appeal.

It has been averred in the application that non-

applicant/appellant has failed to pay arrears amounting to

Rs.1,12,000/- from August, 2022 till September, 2023. It has

further been averred in the application that non-

applicant/appellant is further liable to pay maintenance @

Rs.8000/- per month due from the month of October, 2023

onwards.

In the reply filed on behalf of the non-

applicant/appellant, it is submitted that the non-

applicant/appellant has already paid the amount due against

him as per order of the judicial magistrate. However, the

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
averments made in the application have not been specifically

denied.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties and

have also gone through the material available on record.

In view of the material available on record, it is

clear that non-applicant/appellant has failed to pay the

maintenance @ Rs.8000/- per month from August 2022 till

September 2023 and thereafter from the month of October,

2023 till date. Hence, the applicant/appellant is directed to

pay to the respondent, the entire amount due w.e.f. August

2022 till September, 2023 and thereafter from the month of

October, 2023 till date, within a period of two weeks from

today by remitting the same in her saving bank account.

Application stands disposed of.

FAO No.304 of 2014

As prayed, list on 04.01.2024.

( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge

15th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
Janki and Ors. vs. Mansha Ram

RSA No.503 of 2009

15.12.2023 Present: Mr. Sanjay Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the
appellants except appellant No.2.

Appellant No.2, is stated to have expired.

Mr. Roop Lal Chaudhary, Advocate, for the
respondent.

r to
CMP(M) Nos.1332 & 1333 of 2022

The instant applications under Order 22, Rules

3,5 & 9 and Section 5 of Limitation Act, has been filed by the

applicants/appellants for bringing on record the legal heirs of

deceased appellant No.2, Jai Ram. As per the

applicants/appellants, appellant No.2, Jai Ram, has expired

on 28.05.2017, leaving behind his legal heirs, as mentioned in

para-3 of the application bearing CMP(M) No.1332 of 2022,

who are required to be brought on record. The applications

are duly supported with the affidavits of applicant/appellant

Dhani Ram.

No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the

appearing non-applicant/ respondent.

Heard. Keeping in view the facts and

circumstances of the case and since right to sue survives in

favour of the applicants/appellants, the application is allowed

and legal heirs of deceased appellant No.2, Jai Ram, as

mentioned in para-3 of the application bearing CMP(M)

No.1332 of 2022, are ordered to be brought on record, after

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
setting aside the abatement, if any. The application stands

disposed of.

Amended memo of parties stands already filed,

which is annexed with the application bearing CMP No.1333

of 2022.

Applications stand disposed of.

r to
RSA No.503 of 2009

As prayed, list after four weeks.

( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge

15th December, 2023

(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
Padam Singh vs. Shanti & Others

RSA No.429 of 2010

15.12.2023 Present: Mr. Anshul Gandhi, Advocate Vice Mr. C.N.
Singh, Advocate, for the appellant.

Respondents No.1 to 8, stand already
ex parte.

Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate

General, for respondents No.9 & 10.

CMP No.335 of 2023

Learned Additional Advocate General prays

for and is granted four weeks’ further time to file reply.

List alongwith main appeal.

RSA No.429 of 2010

As prayed, list after four weeks.

( Sushil

Kukreja )
Judge

15th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
Mulakh Ram (deceased) through his LRs
vs. Kishori Lal (deceased) through his

LRs.

RSA No.45 of
2020

15.12.2023 Present: Mr. Sat Parkash, Advocate Vice Mr. Goldy
Kumar, Advocate, for the appellants except
appellant No.1(c).

Mr. Sahil Dixit, Advocate, for respondents
No.1(a) to 1(c), 2(a) to 2(e), 3, 4(a) to 4(d).

Respondents No.5(a) to 5(e), 6(b), 6(d) to

6(g), 7(a) to 7(f), 8(a) o 89d), 9(a) to 9(c) & 10

to 10, already stand ex parte.

At the request of learned vice counsel

appearing on behalf of the appellants, list after four

weeks.

( Sushil

Kukreja )
Judge

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. vs.
Trepan Singh ad Anr.

CMP(M) No.655 of 2020, CMPNo.10261 of
2020 in FAO No.390 of 2006

15.12.2023 Present: Mr. Deepak Bhasin, Senior Advocate with Mr.
Sambhav Bhasin, Advocate, for the applicant.

Respondent No.1, already ex parte.

Mr. Basant Pal Thakur, Advocate, for
rrespondent No.2.

At the request of learned counsel appearing

on behalf of respondent No.2, list after two weeks.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

15th December, 2023

(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
Shashi Kant vs. State of H.P. & Ors.

RSA No.304 of 2022

15.12.2023 Present: Ms. Ashwani Kaundal, Advocate Vice Mr.
Rajesh Kumar, Advocate, for the appellant.

Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate
General, for the respondents.

CMP No.15227 of 2022

Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of

the appellant prays for and is granted three weeks’ further

time to file rejoinder to the reply filed on behalf of the

respondents. List thereafter.

( Sushil
Kukreja )

Judge

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
Ram Gopal vs. CBI

(reena)

Cr. Appeal No.312 of 2022

15.12.2023 Present: Mr. Ashwani Kaundal, Advocate, for the
appellant.

Mr. Anshul Bansal, Advocate, for the respondent.

Cr.MP No.4156 of 2023

This application has been filed by the

applicant/appellant for extension of time to furnish the

personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety in the

like amount, in terms of order dated 02.09.2022, passed by

this Court.

I have heard learned counsel representing the

parties and have also gone through the entire record.

Having regard to the averments made in the

application, which are duly supported with an affidavit of the

applicant, the same is allowed and a last opportunity of two

days’ is granted to the applicant/appellant to furnish personal

bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety in the like

amount to the satisfaction of learned trial court.

Application stands disposed of.

Cr. Appeal No.312 of 2022

List in due course.

( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
State of H.P. vs. Mann Dassi

FAO No.113 of 2016

15.12.2023 Present: Ms. Ayushi Negi, Deputy Advocate General,
for the appellants.

Ms. Vandana Kumari, Advocate Vice Mr.
Sanjay Jaswal, Advocate,for the respondent.

Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of

the respondent prays for adjournment on the ground that

arguing counsel is not available due to his ailment.

As prayed, list after four weeks.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd. vs.
Nikki Devi and ors. a/w connected matter.

FAO(MVA) No.593 of 2016 a/w FAO(MVA)
No.334 of 2018

15.12.2023 Present: Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for the
appellant(s).

Ms. Ankita, Advocate, for the appellants in

FAO (MVA) No.334 of 2018 and for
respondents No.1 to 3 in FAO (MVA) No.593
of 2016.

Ms. Kamlesh Kumari, Advocate Vice Mr.

Amrinder Singh Rana, Advocate, for

respondents No. 4 & 5 in FAO (MVA) No.593
of 2016 and for respondents No.1 & 2 in FAO
(MVA) No.334 of 2018.

Ms. Kamlesh Kumari, learned vice counsel

appearing on behalf of respondents in respective appeals,

prays for adjournment on the ground that arguing counsel

is not available.

As prayed, list after two weeks.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
Sunita Shandil vs. DAV College Managing
Committee & Anr.

RSA No.485 of 2007

15.12.2023 Present: Mr. Rohit, Advocate Vice Mr. Sumit Sood,

Advocate, for the appellant.

Ms. Pratibha, Advoate Vice Mr. C.S. Thakur,
Advocate, for the respondents.

r to
Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of

the appellant prays for adjournment on the ground that

arguing counsel is not available.

As prayed, list after four weeks.

( Sushil

Kukreja )
Judge

15th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
Mohan Lal (deceased) through his LRs vs.
Om Prakash & Ors.

RSA No.424 of 2008

15.12.2023 Present: Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Advocate, for the

appellant.

Mr. Sunil Mohan Goel, Advocate, for the
respondents.

adjournment.

Learned counsel for the respondent prays for

As prayed, list after four weeks.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

15th December, 2023

(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
Sarwan Singh vs. Jeet Singh and Ors.

RSA No.53 of 2023

15.12.2023 Present: Mr. Naveen K. Bhardwaj, Advocate, for th
appellant.

As per report of the Registry, steps for the

service of respondents No.2 & 3 have not been taken.

rLearned counsel for the appellant undertakes

to do the needful within a period of one week. After doing

the needful within the aforesaid period, let respondents

No.2 & 3 be served through affixation as well as through

publication in daily newspaper ‘Amar Ujala’, in terms of

the order dated 08.11.2023, returnable within six weeks.

List thereafter.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

15th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
Rajesh Kumar & Ors.vs. Alka Sood & Ors.

RSA No.67 of 2023

15.12.2023 Present: Mr. Vivek Kumar Attri, Advocate Vice Mr.
Praveen Sharma, Advocate, for the

appellants.

Mr. Nitin Thakur, Advocate, for respondents
No.1 to 4, 6,8,10 & 11.

Mr. Vivek Sharma, Advocate, for respondent
rNo.12.

As per report of the Registry, notices issued

to respondents No.5,7 & 9 through publication have been

received back duly published on 26.11.2023. However,

none has appeared on their behalf, hence, they are

ordered to be proceeded against ex parte.

As prayed, list this appeal for hearing on

admission after three weeks.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

15th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
Jogi Ram vs. Vipin Kumar

RSA No.120 of 2023

15.12.2023 Present: Mr. Lokesh Thakur, Advocate Vice Mr. G.R.
Palsra, Advocate, for the appellant.

Mr. Arvind Sharma, Advocate, for the
respondent.

Learned counsel for the respondent prays for

and is granted two weeks’ further time to file Power of

Attorney. List thereafter.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

15th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
Lal Singh vs. Jai Bhagwan.

                                                  RSA No.185 of 2023





15.12.2023   Present:     Mr.Vinod Chauhan,            Advocate,          for      the
                          appellant.     .

As per report of the Registry, steps for the

service of sole respondent, have not been taken.

r Learned counsel for the appellant undertakes

to do the needful within a period of two days. After doing

the needful within the aforesaid period, let notice be

issued to the aforesaid respondent, returnable within six

weeks thereafter. List thereafter.

( Sushil

Kukreja )
Judge

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
Maheep Kaur vs. Sanjeev Sood
(deceased) through his LRs.

RSA No.192 of 2023 a/w RSA No.312 of
2022

15.12.2023 Present: Mr. Anand Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr.
Virender Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant
in both the appeals.

Mr. Ashok Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr.
Abhishek Banta, Advocate, for respondents
No.1(a) to 1(c) in both the appeals.
.

CMP No.15411/2022 in RSA No.192/2023

Heard. Interim order dated 31.10.2023, is

made absolute during the pendency of the present

appeal. However, it is made clear that the proceedings

pending before the Commissioner, Municipal Corporation,

Shimla, H.P. shall continue and this order shall have no

bearing on the proceedings pending before it.

Application stands disposed of.

RSA No.192 of 2023 & RSA No.312 of 2022

List in due course.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
Tashi Phunchog vs. CBI

Cr. Appeal No.540 of 2023

15.12.2023 Present: Mr. Deepak Bhasin, Senior Advocate with Mr.
Sambhav Bhasin Advocate, for the appellant.

Mr. A.K. Bansal, Advocate, for the
respondent.

Cr.MP No.4445 of 2023

r Learned counsel for the respondent prays for

and is granted two weeks’ further time to file reply.

As prayed, list on 04.01.2024.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
Tashi Phunchog vs. CBI

(reena)

Cr. Appeal No.399 of 2023

15.12.2023 Present: Mr. Deepak Bhasin, Senior Advocate with Mr.
Sambhav Bhasin Advocate, for the appellant.

Mr. A.K. Bansal, Advocate, for the
respondent.

Cr.MP No.3238 of 2023

rLearned counsel for the appellant prays for

adjournment.

As prayed, list on 21.12.2023.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
Tashi Phunchog vs. CBI

(reena)

Cr. Appeal No.416 of 2023

15.12.2023 Present: Mr. Deepak Bhasin, Senior Advocate with Mr.
Sambhav Bhasin Advocate, for the appellant.

Mr. A.K. Bansal, Advocate, for the
respondent.

Cr.MP No.3518 of 2023

r Learned counsel for the respondent prays for

and is granted two weeks’ further time to file reply.

As prayed, list on 04.01.2023.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

15th December, 2023

(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
NIC Ltd. vs. Tej Ram & Ors.

FAO (MVA) No.05/2015

14.12.2023 Present: Mr. Ishan Sharma, Advocate, for the
appellant.

Ms. Kavita Kajal, Advocate vice Mr. Atharv
Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.1 & 2.

Mr. Vinod Chauhan, Advocate, for
respondents No. 3 to 6.

CMP No.1455 of 2023

The present application under Section 151 of te

Code of Civil Procedure has been maintaie db

applicants/appellants No.2 & 3, namely Ram Kumar and Ravi

Kumar, for release of entire amount of compensation in their

favour, asper their shares, which is lying deposited in the

Registry of this Court.

It has been mentioned in the application that

applicants/appellants No.2 & 3 namely Ram Kumar and Ravi

Kumar have now attained age of majority and are in dire need

of money, as they have started construction work, as such, the

entire amount of compensation may be released in their

favour.

FAO (MVA) No.05/2015

List alongwith FAO No.4/2015, FAO

No.6/2015, FAO No.7/2015, FAO No.8/2015, FAO

No.23/2015, FAO No.24/2015 and FAO No.25/2015.

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS

( Sushil
Kukreja )

                                          Judge





    14th December, 2023
        (reena)





              r           to









                            ::: Downloaded on - 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS

Pappi Devi & Ors. vs. Kali Ram and Ors.

CMP No.10147/2023 in FAO No.306/ 2004

14.12.2023 Present: Mr. Virender Thakur, Advocate, for the
applicants/appellants.

Mr. Ishan Sharma, Advocate, for respondent
No.3/OIC.

CMP No.10147/202

The present application under Section 151 of the

Code of Civil Procedure, has been maintained by

applicants/appellants No.2 & 3, namely Ram Kumar and Ravi

Kumar, for release of entire amount of compensation in their

favour, as per their shares, which is lying deposited in the

Registry of this Court.

2. It has been mentioned in the application that

applicants/appellants No.2 & 3, namely Ram Kumar and Ravi

Kumar, have now attained the age of majority and are in dire

need of money as they have started construction work, as

such, the entire amount of compensation falling in their

shares, be released to them.

3. Learned counsel for respondent No.3/OIC has

submitted that he has no objection in case the entire amount

of compensation falling in the shares of applicants/appellants

No.2 & 3, lying deposited in the Registry of this Court, is

released in their favour, as the award has attained finality and

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
no appeal has been preferred against the judgment dated

15.09.2008, passed by this Court in FAO No.306 of 2004.

4. Having regard to the averments made in the

application, which are duly supported with affidavits of both

the applicants as well as taking into consideration the fact that

the matter has been finally decided by this Court vide

judgment dated 15.09.2008 and since no appeal whatsoever

has been filed by either of the parties in the superior court of

law against the aforesaid judgment, the same has attained

finality, as such, the present application is allowed and the

entire amount of compensation falling in the shares of

applicants/appellants No.2 & 3, namely Ram Kumar and Ravi

Kumar alongwith up-to-date interest, which is lying deposited

in the registry of this Court, is ordered to be released in their

favour, by remitting the same in their saving bank accounts,

after due verification, details whereof have been given in

Para-4 of the application.

The application stands disposed of.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

14th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
Lekh Raj through his LRs. Sanjeev Kumar
and Ors. vs. Mehar Chand & ors.

RSA No.286 of 2023

14.12.2023 Present: Mr. Neeraj Sharma and Mr. Surender K.

Sharma, Advocates, for the appellants.

RSA No.286 of 2023

Issue notice to the respondents, returnable

within six weeks, on taking steps within a period of one

week. List thereafter.

CMP No.18683 of 2023

Notice in the aforesaid terms. Reply, if any,

be filed within six weeks.

In the meantime, parties are directed to

maintain status quo qua nature and possession of the suit

land subject to compliance of Order 39 Rue 3 of CPC.

CMP No.18684 of 2023

The application is disposed of with a direction

to the applicants to file certified copy of the judgment,

Annexure A-2, within four weeks.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

14th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
Roshan lal v s. Kisharu Ram

RSA No.285 of 2022

14.12.2023 Present: Ms. Anita, Advocate vice Ms. Anu Tuli,
Advocate, for the appellant.

Mr. G.R. Palsra, Advocate, for proposed LRs
No.1(a) to 1(e).

Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of

the appellant prays for adjournment on the ground that

arguing counsel is not available.

As prayed, list after two weeks.

( Sushil
Kukreja )

Judge

14th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
Asha Sharma vs. Anglo Sanskrit Model
Senior Secondary School Nela & Ors.

RSA No.178 of 2023

14.12.2023 Present: Mr. Subhash Sharma, Advocate, for the

appellant.

Ms. Kiran Jeet Kaur Narula and Mr. Yoginder
Paul, Advocates, for respondents No. 1 & 2.

Mr. Lalit K. Sehgal, Advocate, for respondent
No.3.

Learned counsel representing the appellant

prays for adjournment to seek further instructions in the

matter.

As prayed, list after six weeks.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

14th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
State of H.P. & Ors. vs. Balraj Singh

RSA No.219 of 2023

14.12.2023 Present: Ms. Ayushi Negi, Deputy Advocate General,
for the appellants.

Mr. Atul Kumar, Advocate vice Mr. Vikrant
Chandel, Advocate, for the respondents.

CMP Nos.14305 & 14306 of 2023

Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of

the respondents prays for and is granted further three

weeks’ time to file reply. List thereafter.

( Sushil
Kukreja )

Judge

14th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
Hari Dass vs. Ganga Dassi & others.

RSA No.226 of 2023

14.12.2023 Present: Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate vice Mr. I.S.
Chandel, Advocate, for the appellant.

Ms. Rinki Kashmiri, Advocate vice Mr.Janesh
Gupta, Advocate, for respondents No. 1 & 4.

Ms. Anita, Advocate vice Ms.Anu Tuli,
Advocate, for respondents No.2 & 3.

Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of

the appellant prays for adjournment on the ground that

arguing counsel is not available.

As prayed, list after three weeks.

( Sushil

Kukreja )
Judge

14th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
Durga Dass vs. Chuni Lal

RSA No.597 of 2019

14.12.2023 Present: Ms. Rinki Kashmiri, Advocate vice Mr.Janesh
Gupta, Advocate, for the appellant.

Ms. Devyani Sharma, Senior Advocate with
Mr. Basant Pal Thakur, Advocate, for the
respondent.

Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of

the appellant prays for adjournment on the ground that

arguing counsel is not available.

Learned counsel for the respondent has

objected to the prayer made on behalf of the appellant for

adjournment. However, in the interest of justice, list for

final hearing at admission stage on 19.12.2023.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

14th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
Amanpreet Singh vs. Gian Ram
(deceased) through his LRs Smt. Kala

Devi & Ors.

                                                        RSA          No.99         of
                         2020





14.12.2023   Present:    Ms. Rinki Kashmiri, Advocate vice Mr.Janesh

Gupta, Advocate, for the appellant.

Ms. Devyani Sharma, Senior Advocate with
Mr. Basant Pal Thakur, Advocate, for the
rrespondents.

Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of

the appellant prays for adjournment on the ground that

arguing counsel is not available.

As prayed, list after four weeks.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

14th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
Govind vs. Santosh Kumar & Ors.

RSA No.15 of 2021

14.12.2023 Present: Mr. Rajul Chauhan, Advocate vice Mr. Ajay
Singh Kashyap, Advocate, for the appellant.

Mr. Sunil Gautam, Advocate vice Mr. Aman
Parth Sharma, Advocate, for respondent
No.1.

Ms. Ayushi Negi, Deputy Advocate General,
rfor the respondents No.2 & 3/State.

Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of

the appellant prays for adjournment on the ground that

arguing counsel is not available.

As prayed, list after four weeks.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

14th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
Nirmala Devi (name deleted) vs. Sant Ram
(deceased) through his LRs.

RSA No.512 of 2006

14.12.2023 Present: Mr.R.K. Bawa, Senior Advocate, alongwith

Mr.Ajay Kumar Sharma, Advocate, for the
appellant.

Respondent No.1 deleted vide order dated

15.06.2010 and appellants were exempted
from bringing on record legal representatives
of deceased respondent No.1 vide order
dated 23.05.2011.

Respondent No.2, ex parte.

Mr.Ashok Sood, Senior Advocate, alongwith
Ms.Pooja Verma, Advocate, for respondent
No.3.

Respondents No.4(a) to 4(e), ex parte.

Respondent No.5, ex parte.

Mr. Sumit Sharma, Advocate vice Mr.Hitesh

Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.6.

Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of

respondent No.6, prays for adjournment on the ground

that arguing counsel is not available.

As prayed, list after four weeks.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

14th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
Som Singh & Anr. vs. State of H.P.

Cr. Appeal No.66 of 2009

14.12.2023 Present: Mr.Naresh Verma, Advocate, for the
appellants.

Ms. Ayushi Negi, Deputy Advocate General,
for the respondent-State.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

appellants prays for adjournment on the ground that

arguing counsel is not available.

As prayed, list after six weeks.

( Sushil
Kukreja )

Judge

14th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
Kunti Devi & Anr. vs. Pawan Kumar & Ors.

FAO No.192 of 2015

14.12.2023 Present: Mr. Navlesh Verma, Advocate, for the
appellants.

Mr. Kudeep Gagta, Advocate vice Mr. Vishal
Bindra, Advocate, for respondents No.1 & 2.

Mr. J.S. Bagga, Advocate, for respondent
No.3.

Arguments heard. Judgment reserved.

( Sushil

Kukreja )
Judge

14th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
Ganesh Chand vs. Sohan Lal

Cr. Appeal No.290 of 2023

14.12.2023 Present: Ms. Anita Jalota, Advocate, for the appellant.

None for the respondent.

Since none has appeared on behalf of the

respondent despite repeated calls, in the interest of

justice, list after four weeks.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

14th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
NIC Ltd. vs. Tej Ram & Ors.

FAO (MVA) No.05/2015

14.12.2023 Present: Mr. Ishan Sharma, Advocate, for the
appellant.

Ms. Kavita Kajal, Advocate vice Mr. Atharv
Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.1 & 2.

Mr. Vinod Chauhan, Advocate, for
respondents No. 3 to 6.

CMP No.1455 of 2023

No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the

appearing non-applicants/respondents and they have no

objection, in case, the instant application is allowed.

Hence, in view of the averments made in the

application, the same is allowed and the name of deceased

respondent No.2, Nirma Devi, is ordered to be deleted from

the array of the parties, subject to all just exceptions.

Amended memo of parties stands already filed,

which is ordered to be taken on record.

Application stands disposed of.

FAO (MVA) No.05/2015

List alongwith FAO No.4/2015, FAO

No.6/2015, FAO No.7/2015, FAO No.8/2015, FAO

No.23/2015, FAO No.24/2015 and FAO No.25/2015.

( Sushil
Kukreja )

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
Judge

    14th December, 2023





        (reena)





              r           to









                           ::: Downloaded on - 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS

NIC Ltd. vs. Ram Kali & Ors.

CMP No.12635/2023 in FAO No.416/2008

14.12.2023 Present: Mr. Ishan Sharma, Advocate, for the non-

applicant/appellant.

Mr. Dinesh Bhanot, Advocate, for
applicants/respondents.

Learned counsel for the

applicants/respondents is directed to file affidavits of

respondents No.3 & 4 as well as legal representatives of

deceased respondents No.5 & 6, within a period of two

weeks. List thereafter.

( Sushil
Kukreja )

Judge

14th December, 2023

(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
United India Insurance Company Ltd. vs.
Sarswati & Ors. a/w connected matters.

FAO No.147 of 2014 a/w FAO Nos.356, 361

and 412 of 2016

13.12.2023 Present: Mr. Ashwani K. Sharma, Senior Advocate
with Ms. Nisha, Advocate, for the appellants
in FAO No.147/2014, 356/2016, 361/2016
and for respondent No.1 in FAO

No.412/2016.

Mr. Yogesh Kumar Chandel, Advocate, for the
appellant in FAO No.412/2016 and for
rrespondent No.4 in FAO No.147/2014,
356/2016 and for respondent No.5 in FAO

No.361/2016.

Mr. S.C. Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr.
Arun Kumar, Advocate, for respondents No.1

to 4 in FAO No.361 of 2016.

Mr. Yogesh Kumar Chandel, learned counsel

appearing on behalf of the appellant in FAO No.412/2016,

prays for adjournment.

As prayed, list on 02.01.2024.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

13th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
Rekha Devi & Ors. vs. JP Associates
Hydro Electric Project & Anr.

FAO No.94 of 2015

13.12.2023 Present: Mr. Saurabh Ahluwalia, Advocate vice

Mr.Subhash Sharma, Advocate, for the
appellants.

Mr. Anand Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr.

Karan Sharma, Advocate, for respondent
No.1.

Dr. Lalit Sharma, Advocate, for respondent
No.2.

Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of

the appellants prays for adjournment on the ground that

arguing counsel is pre-occupied in another Court.

As prayed, list after two weeks.

( Sushil

Kukreja )
Judge

13th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
Ashwani Kumar vs. Vandna Devi

FAO No.166 of 2014

12.12.2023 Present: Ms. Hem Lata Vyas, Advocate vice Mr. Neel
Kamal Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.

Mr. Vishal Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. Vikrant
Thakur, Advocate, for the respondent.

Parties are not present.

Now, list this case for final hearing next week.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

12th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
Phangan Ram vs. Jai Chand & ors.

RSA No.493 of 2019

12.12.2023 Present: Mr. Sanjay Dutt Vasudeva, Advocate, for the
appellant.

Mr. Prashant Chaudhary, Advocate, for the
respondents.

Parties are not present.

As jointly prayed, list after four weeks.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

12th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
Jai Inder Pal Singh vs. Jasvinder Singh
Narula

Arbitration Case No.40 of 2009

12.12.2023 Present: Mr. Tarunjeet Singh Rana, Advocate, for the

Objector.

Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr.
Vedhant Ranta, Advocate, for the

respondent/non-objector.

Rejoinder stands filed.

In view of the order dated 24 th July, 2023,

passed by Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, list this case

for final hearing after two weeks.

( Sushil
Kukreja )

Judge

12th December, 2023

(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
Roop Chand (deceased) through his LRs
Ashok Soni and Ors. vs. Vidya Devi

(deceased) through her LRs Sh. Lekh Raj

& ors.

RSA No.542 of 2009

12.12.2023 Present: Mr. K.D. Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Het
Ram Thakur, Advocate, for the appellants.

Mr. Sandeep K. Pandey, Advocate, for the
respondents.

RSA No.542/2019 a/w CMP Nos.726 & 7807

of 2023

Further three weeks’ time, as prayed, is

granted to the non-applicants/appellants to file replies to

the applications bearing CMP Nos.726 & 7807 of 2023.

List thereafter.

( Sushil

Kukreja )
Judge

12th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
Braham Dass (deceased) through his LRs
vs. Sham Sharma and others.

RSA No.296 of 2019

12.12.2023 Present: Mr. Romesh Verma, Senior Advocate with Mr.

Sumit Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.

Mr. Sunny Modgil, Advocate, for respondent
No.1.

Respondents No.2 & 3 already ex parte.

RSA No.296/2019 & CMP No.7611/2023

At the joint request of learned counsel

representing the parties, list after four weeks.

( Sushil

Kukreja )
Judge

12th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
M/s Supreme Infrastructure Vs. CPWD &
ors.

Arbitration Case No.20 of 2020

12.12.2023 Present: Mr. Vivek Negi, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Virbhadur Verma, Central Government
Standing Counsel, for respondents No.1 & 2.

Mr. Arvind Sharma, Advocate, for
respondents No.3 & 4.

Ms. Jyoti Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent
No.5.

Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for

adjournment to seek further instructions in the matter.

As prayed, list after four weeks.

Till then, interim order dated 20.03.2020,

shall remain in force.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

12th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
Kuram Dev vs. Surender Kumar Sharma

RSA No.19 of 2023

12.12.2023 Present: Mr. Karan Kapoor, Advocate, for the
appellant.

Mr. Imran Khan, Advocate, for the
respondent.

CMP No.690 of 2023

Learned counsel for the non-

applicant/respondent prays for and is granted two weeks’

time to file reply. List thereafter.

( Sushil
Kukreja )

Judge

12th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
Barsha vs. Giani (deceased) through her
LRs and another

RSA No.121 of 2023

12.12.2023 Present: Mr. Hemand Vaid, Advocate, for the

appellant.

None for respondents No.1(a) & 1(b), though
served.

Mr. B.L. Soni, Advocate, for respondent No.2.

CMP No.6879 of 2023

Heard. Interim order dated 12.06.2023, is

made absolute during the pendency of the present

appeal, however, subject to alteration, vacation and

modification on motion.

Application stands disposed of.

RSA No.121 of 2023

Steps for the service of post admission notice

on behalf of respondents No.1(a) & 1(b), have not been

taken. Learned counsel for the appellant undertakes to do

the needful within a period of one week. After doing the

needful within the aforesaid period, let post admission

notice be issued to aforesaid respondents No.1(a) & 1(b),

returnable within six weeks thereafter. List thereafter.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
12th December, 2023

        (reena)






              r           to









                           ::: Downloaded on - 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS

Suresh Kumar vs. State of H.P.

Cr. Appeal No.354 of 2023

12.12.2023 Present: Mr. Devender K. Sharma, Advocate, for the
appellant.

Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate
General, for the respondent/State.

Cr.MP No.2838 of 2023

Learned counsel for the appellant prays for

adjournment.

As prayed, list on 09.01.2024.

( Sushil
Kukreja )

Judge

12th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
Neelam Rana vs. Ashok Chopra

CMP(M) No.437 of 2023

12.12.2023 Present: Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr.
Vedhant Ranta, Advocate, for the

applicant/appellant.

Mr. Arjun Lal, Advocate, for the respondent.

Learned counsel for the respondent submits

that reply has been filed in the Registry on 11.12.2023,

however, the same is not on record. Registry to trace and

place the same on record, if in order. List thereafter.

( Sushil
Kukreja )

Judge

12th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
State of H.P. & Anr. vs. Sh. Tilak Raj

Arbitration Case No.880 of 2023

12.12.2023 Present: Ms. Ranjana Patial, Deputy Advocate
General, for the objectors/appellants.

Arbitration Case No.880 of 2023

Let notice be issued to the respondent,

returnable within six weeks, on taking steps within a

period of five days. List thereafter.

OMP No.557 of 2023

Notice in the aforesaid terms. Reply, if any,

be filed within a period of six weeks.

In the meantime, execution of the award

dated 28.07.2023, passed by learned Arbitrator Sh. Raj

Kumar Verma (Retd. E-in-C), shall remain stayed,

however, subject to deposit of the entire amount of award

along with up-to-date interest, within a period of six

weeks. List thereafter alongwith main matter.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

12th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
Rajman vs. Sher Singh and others

RSA No.72 of 2009

12.12.2023 Present: Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr.
Vedhant Ranta, Advocate, for the appellant.

Mr. K.D. Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Het
Ram Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.1(a)
and respondent No.2.

Respondent No.3, already ex parte.

CMP(M) No.1050 of 2023

Heard. In the reply filed by non-

applicants/respondents, which is duly supported with an

affidavit of respondent Ram Parkash Negi, it is submitted that

besides respondent No.1(a) Bharat Singh, deceased

respondent No.1, Sher Singh, has left behind his widow Swal

Devi and his three daughters, namely, Ram Devi, Kavita and

Vinod Kumari, who are his heirs and legal representatives

and, therefore, they are also entitled to be brought on record.

Therefore, in view of the averments made in the

application as well as in the reply, the application is allowed

and besides LR respondent No.1(a) Bharat Singh, other legal

representatives, namely Swal Devi (widow), Ram Devi, Kavita

and Vinod Kumari (daughters) of deceased respondent No.1,

Sher Singh are ordered to be brought on record.

Application stands disposed of.

RSA No.72 of 2009

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS

Mr.Het Ram Thakur, learned Advocate, appears

and waives service of notice on behalf of newly impleaded

respondents namely Swal Devi, Ram Devi, Kavita and Vinod

Kumari. He prays for and is granted one week’s time to file

Power of Attorney on their behalf. Amended memo of parties

be also filed by the appellant within the aforesaid period. List

thereafter.

                r           to                 ( Sushil Kukreja )

                                                    Judge

    12th December, 2023
         (reena)








                                         ::: Downloaded on - 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS

Narain Singh vs. Jasvir Singh Sudan

Cr. Appeal No.197 of 2023

11.12.2023 Present: Mr. K.B. Khajuria, Advocate, for the appellant.

Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate
General, for the respondent.

Learned counsel for the appellant has

submitted that in view of the report filed by the Sub

Divisional Police Officer, Ghumarwin, District Bilaspur,

H.P., the matter may be closed.

Therefore, in view of the statement made by

learned counsel for the appellant, the present

proceedings are ordered to be closed.

Since the matter stands already disposed of

vide order dated 22.05.2023, passed by a Coordinate

Bench of this Court, the fie after due completion be

consigned to record room.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
Smt. Prem Lata vs. Gurdas Chand

RSA No.205 of 2021

11.12.2023 Present: Mr. R.L. Chaudhary, Advocate, for the
appellant.

Dr. Lalit Kumar Sharma, Advocate, for the
respondent.

Let record of both the learned courts below

be called for.

As prayed, list for consideration in the month

of March, 2024.

( Sushil
Kukreja )

Judge

11th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
OIC vs. Ram Pyari Gupta and others

FAO No.234 of 2014

11.12.2023 Present: Mr. G.C. Gupta, Senior Advocate with Ms.
Meera Devi, Advocate, for the appellant.

None for respondents No.1 & 2.

Mr. Vikrant Chandel, Advocate, for

respondents No.3 & 4.

Learned counsel for respondents No.3 & 4

prays for adjournment.

As prayed, list after two weeks.

( Sushil
Kukreja )

Judge

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
Mast Ram & others vs. Nand Lal & others

RSA No.229 of 2023

11.12.2023 Present: Mr. G.R. Palsra, Advocate, for the appellants.

Mr. Gambhir Singh Chauhan, Advocate, for
respondents No.1 to 4.

Respondent No.4, is stated to have expired.

r to
CMP No.13731 of 2023

No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the

appearing non-applicants/respondents and they have no

objection, in case, the instant application is allowed.

Hence, in view of the averments made in the

application, the same is allowed and the name of deceased

respondent No.4, Durga, is ordered to be deleted from the

array of the parties, subject to all just exceptions.

Amended memo of parties stands already filed,

which is ordered to be taken on record.

Application stands disposed of.

CMP No.13730 of 2023

No reply is intended to be filed by the non-

applicants/respondents.

Heard. Having regard to the averments made in

the application, which are duly supported with an affidavit of

applicant Mast Ram, the present application is allowed and

the execution of the impugned judgment and decree dated

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:58 :::CIS
14.12.2022, passed by learned Senior Civil Judge, Court

No.1, Sundernagar, District Mandi, H.P. in Civil Suit No.47-

1/2014, titled Nand Lal & Ors. vs. Mast Ram & Ors. and

further affirmed by learned Additional District Judge,

Sundernagar, District Mandi, H.P. vide judgment dated

15.06.2023 in Civil Appeal No.5/2023, titled Mast Ram & ors.

vs. Nand Lal & Ors., shall remain stayed and the parties are

directed to maintain status quo qua nature and possession of

the suit land during the pendency of the present appeal.

Application stands disposed of.

CMP No.13732 of 2023

The application is disposed of with a direction

to the applicants to file English translation of Annexure A-

1, within a period of four weeks.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
Beas Valley Power Corporation vs.
Continental Construction Projects Ltd.

Arbitration Appeal No.2 of 2014

11.12.2023 Present: Mr. Suneet Goel, Advocate, for the appellant.

Mr. Sunil Mohan Goel, Advocate, for the
respondent.

OMP No.267 of 2023

rAt the joint request of leaned counsel

representing the parties, list on 08.01.2024.

( Sushil
Kukreja )

Judge

11th December, 2023

(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
NIC vs. Smt. Indira & Rekha and other

FAO No.84 of 2016

11.12.2023 Present: Mr. Praveen Sharma, Advocate vice Mr.
Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for the

appellant/non-applicant.

Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate, for the
applicants/respondents.

r to
CMP No.13353 of 2023

The present application under Order 32 Rule 12

read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, has

been maintained by applicant/respondent No.3, Diksha, for

discharging her natural guardian.

2. Learned counsel for the non-applicant/appellant

submitted that he doesn’t intend to file any reply to the present

application and has no objection, in case, the same is allowed.

3. Heard. Since the applicant/respondent No.3,

Diksha, has attained the age of majority, as is evident from the

Matriculation certificate annexed with the application bearing

CMP No.13350 of 2023, as Annexure A-1, the application is

allowed and her natural guardian, i.e. her mother, respondent

No.1, Indira @ Rekha, is discharged and she is allowed to

pursue the case in her own capacity.

The application stands disposed of.

CMP No.13350 of 2023

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS

4. The present application under Section 151 of the

Code of Civil Procedure, has been maintained by

applicants/respondents No.1,3 & 4, namely Indira, (wife),

Diksha (daughter) and Sumitra (mother) of deceased Tara

Chand, for release of entire compensation amount in their

favour, as per their shares, as lying deposited in the Registry

of this Court.

r to
It has been mentioned in the application that the

applicant No. 3, namely Diksha, has now attained the age of

majority and applicants are in dire need of money to renovate

their house at native place and to pay the college fee of

applicant Diksha; and also to meet out their daily expenses for

their livelihood, as there is no source of income, as such, the

entire amount of compensation falling in their shares, be

released to them.

6. Learned counsel for the non-applicant/appellant

has submitted that since the appeal having been filed by the

non-applicant/appellant before this Court bearing FAO No.84

of 2016, was withdrawn by it, vide order/judgment dated

10.12.2021, the award has attained finality and as such, he

has no objection in case the amount of compensation falling in

the shares of applicants/respondents No.1,3 & 4, lying

deposited in the Registry of this Court, be released in their

favour.

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS

7. Having regard to the averments made in the

application, which are duly supported with affidavits of

aforesaid applicants No.1,3 &4 as well as taking into

consideration the fact that the appeal having been filed by the

non-applicant/appellant before this Court bearing FAO No.84

of 2016, was withdrawn by it, vide order/judgment dated

10.12.2021, the award has attained finality, as such, the

present application is allowed and the entire amount of

compensation falling in the shares of applicants/respondents

No.1,3 & 4, namely Indira, (wife), Diksha (daughter) and

Sumitra (mother) of deceased Tara Chand alongwith up-to-

date interest, which is lying deposited in the registry of this

Court, is ordered to be released in their favour, strictly as per

their shares, by remitting the same in their saving bank

accounts, after due verification, details whereof have been

given in Paras-4, 5 & 6 of the application.

The application stands disposed of.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

11th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
Satish Kumar (deceased through LRs and
another) vs. Vinod Gupta and Ors.

RSA No.51 of 2023

11.12.2023 Present: Mr. Sanjay Jaswal, Advocate, for the

appellants.

Mr. Neeraj Kumar Sharma and Mr. Hemant
Kumar Thakur, Advocates, for respondents

No.1 & 2.

Respondents No.3 to 13, already ex parte.

RSA No.51 of 2023 & CMP No.2038 of 2023

At the joint request of leaned counsel

representing the parties, list after four weeks.

In the meantime, interim order to continue.

( Sushil

Kukreja )
Judge

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
Satish Jain and another vs. Bhagra Resort
Pvt. Ltd.

RSA No.74 of 2023

11.12.2023 Present: Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocate, for the

appellants.

Mr. Sumit Sood, Advocate, for the
respondent.

r to
At the joint request of leaned counsel

representing the parties, list after four weeks.

( Sushil
Kukreja )

Judge

11th December, 2023

(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
Sneh Lata & Ors. vs. Subhash Chand & ors.
CMP Nos.16612 & 17640 of 2023 in FAO

No.128 of 2012

08.12.2023 Present: Mr. Vivek Singh Thakur, Advocate, for the
applicants/ appellants.

Mr. Sidharth, Advocate vice Ms. Anjali Soni
Verma, Advocate, for respondents No.1 & 2.

Mr. Abhishek Verma, Advocate vice Mr. Praneet

Gupta, Advocate, for respondent No.3.

Name of respondent No.4, stands already
deleted.

CMP No.16612 of 2023

The present application under Order 32 Rule 12,

read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, has

been maintained by applicants/appellants No.2 & 3, namely

Sakshi and Sahil Chaudhary, for discharging their natural

guardian.

2. Learned counsel for the respondents submitted

that they do not intend to file any reply to the present

application and has no objection, in case, the same is allowed.

3. Heard. Since the applicants/appellants No.2 & 3,

namely Sakshi and Sahil Chaudhary, have attained the age of

majority, as is evident from the copies of Aadhar Cards and

Matriculation Certificates of them, annexed with the

application as Annexure-2/A & Annexure-2/B and Annexure-

3/A & Annexure-3/B, respectively, the present application is

allowed and their natural guardian, i.e. their mother,

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
applicant/appellant No.1, Sneh Lata, is discharged from their

guardianship and they are allowed to pursue the case in their

own capacity.

The application stands disposed of.

CMP No.17640 of 2023

4. The present application under Section 151 of the

Code of Civil

Procedure, has been maintained

applicants/appellants No.2 & 3, namely Sakshi and Sahil

Chaudhary, for release of entire compensation amount in their
by

favour, which is lying deposited in the Registry of this Court.

5. It has been mentioned in the application that

applicants/appellants No.2 & 3, namely Sakshi and Sahil

Chaudhary, have now attained the age of majority and are in

dire need of money to meet out their daily expenses for the

livelihood, as there is no source of income, as such, the entire

amount of compensation falling in their shares, be released to

them.

6. Learned counsel for the respondents have

submitted that they have no objection in case the amount of

compensation falling in the shares of applicants/appellants

No.2 & 3, lying deposited in the Registry of this Court, is

released in their favour, as the award has attained finality and

no appeal has been preferred against the judgment dated

04.11.2016, passed by this Court in FAO No.128 of 2012.

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS

7. Having regard to the averments made in the

application, which are duly supported with affidavits of both

the applicants as well as taking into consideration the fact that

the matter has been finally decided by this Court vide

judgment dated 04.11.2016 and since no appeal whatsoever

has been filed by either of the parties in the superior court of

law against the aforesaid judgment, the same has attained

finality, as such, the present application is allowed and the

entire amount of compensation falling in the shares of

applicants/appellants No.2 & 3, namely Sakshi and Sahil

Chaudhary alongwith up-to-date interest, which is lying

deposited in the registry of this Court, is ordered to be

released in their favour, by remitting the same in their saving

bank accounts, after due verification, details whereof have

been given in Para-2 of the application.

The application stands disposed of.

( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge

8th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
Paras Ram Sen vs. State of H.P.

Cr.MP(M) No.3062 of 2023

08.12.2023 Present: Mr. Manoj Pathak, Advocate, for the
petitioner.

Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate
General, for the respondent/State.

Notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional

Advocate General appears and waives service of notice

on behalf of the respondent/State. He prays for and is

granted two weeks’ time to file status report.

List on 26.12.2023.

( Sushil
Kukreja )

Judge

8th December, 2023

(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
Dhian Singh & another vs. Pawan Kumar

RSA No.73 of 2020

08.12.2023 Present: Mr. Nitin Goswami, Advocate vice Mr.Vinod
Thakur, Advocate, for the appellants.

Mr. Tarun K. Sharma, Advocate, for the
respondent.

At the request of learned vice counsel

appearing on behalf of the appellants, list after four

weeks.

( Sushil

Kukreja )
Judge

8th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
Anil Kumar vs. Municipal Council, Una
and others.

RSA No.300 of 2022

08.12.2023 Present: Mr. Vipul Sharda, Advocate, for the appellant.

Mr. Tarun K. Sharma, Advocate, for
respondents No.1 & 2.

Learned counsel for the appellant prays for

adjournment on the ground that he has to inspect the

record.

As prayed, list after two weeks.

( Sushil
Kukreja )

Judge

8th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
Lalit Kumar & others vs. Chandermani @
Naresh.

RSA No.16 of 2023

08.12.2023 Present: Ms. Seema K. Guleria, Advocate, for the

appellants.

Mr. G.R. Palsra, Advocate, for the
respondent.

r to
RSA No.16 of 2023

Heard. Admit on the substantial questions of

law No.1, 2 & 5, formulated at Pages No.14 & 15 of the

paper book.

List for final hearing in due course.

CMP No.666 of 2023

Heard. Interim order dated 12.01.2023, is

made absolute during the pendency of the present appeal.

Application stands disposed of.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
Nayodhan Dass vs. Mohan Lal

RSA No.96 of 2023

08.12.2023 Present: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Ms.
Kavita Kajal, Advocate, for the appellant.

Mr. Abhishek Nagta, Advocate vice Mr.
Pramod Singh Thakur, Advocate, for
respondent No.1.

Respondent No.2, already ex parte.

Heard. Admit on the substantial question of

law No.2, formulated at Page No.11 of the paper book.

Let post admission notice be issued to

respondent No.2, returnable within six weeks, on taking

steps within a period of one week. List thereafter.

( Sushil

Kukreja )
Judge

8th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
.

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS

Narotam Ram & Ors. vs. Dillu & Ors.

RSA No. 117 of 2023

08.12.2023 Present: Mr. Rupam Chaudhary, Advocate vice Mr.
Lalit K. Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.

Mr. Devender K. Sharma, Advocate, for the
respondent.

CMP No.6671 of 2023

Learned counsel for the non-

applicant/respondent prays for and is granted two weeks’

time to file reply. List thereafter.

In the meantime, interim order to continue.

( Sushil

Kukreja )
Judge

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
Rakesh Kumar Sood vs. Kanta & Others

RSA No. 124 of 2023

08.12.2023 Present: Mr. Ashok Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr.
Abhishek Banta, Advocate, for the appellant.

Ms. Rinki Kashmiri, Advocate vice Mr.
Vedhant Ranta, Advocate, for the
respondents.

Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of

the respondent prays for and is granted two weeks’ time

to file Power of Attorney. List thereafter.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

8th December, 2023

(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
Kanta Sharma (deceased) through her
LRs vs. Rajesh Jaswal

RSA No. 220 of 2023

08.12.2023 Present: Mr. H.S. Rangra, Advocate, for the

appellants.

Mr. T.S. Chauhan, Advocate, for the
respondent.

r to
RSA No. 220 of 2023

Heard. Admit on the substantial questions of

law No.1,3 & 4, formulated at Page Nos.7 & 8 of the

paper book.

CMP No.14945 of 2023

Heard.

The parties are directed to maintain status

quo qua nature and possession of the suit land during the

pendency of the present appeal, however, subject to

alteration, vacation and modification on motion.

Application stands disposed of.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

8th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
Ashok Kumar vs. Maya Devi

RSA No. 328 of 2022

08.12.2023 Present: Mr. Y.P. Sood, Advocate, for the appellant.

Proposed LR-1(b) already ex parte.

Heard. Admit on the substantial questions of

law No.1 & 2, formulated at Page Nos.13 & 14 of the

paper book.

Let post admission notice be issued to

respondents No.1(i) & 1(ii), returnable within six weeks,

on taking steps within a period of five days.

In the meantime, record of learned courts

below be also called for.

( Sushil
Kukreja )

Judge

8th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
Leela Devi vs. State of H.P. & Another

RSA No. 356 of 2022

08.12.2023 Present: Ms. Avni Kochhar, Advocate vice Mr. Vivek
Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.

Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate
General, for respondent No.1/State.

Mr. H.R. Jhingta, Advocate, for respondent
No.2.

RSA No. 356 of 2022 & CMP
No.17219/2022

Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of

the appellant prays for adjournment on the ground that

arguing counsel is not available today.

As prayed, list on 27.12.2023.

In the meantime, interim order to continue.

( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
Piara Lal & Ors. vs. Mohan Lal

RSA No. 94 of 2023

08.12.2023 Present: Mr. Rahul, Advocate, for the appellant.

Mr. Basant Pal Thakur, Advocate, for the
respondent.

CMP Nos. 4640 & 4641 of 2023

Replies to the instant applications stand filed.

Learned counsel for the applicant/appellant

prays for and is granted three weeks’ time to file rejoinder.

List thereafter.

( Sushil
Kukreja )

Judge

8th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
Dinesh Kumar vs. Milkhi Ram a/w
connected matter.

RSA Nos. 113 & 114 of 2021

08.12.2023 Present: Mr. Tarun Sharma, Advocate, for the

appellant(s).

Mr. Rajinder Singh Thakur, Advocate, for the
respondent.

r to
In order to explore the possibility of amicable

settlement, with the consent of learned counsel for the

parties, the matter is referred to mediation and Mr. G.D.

Verma, learned Senior Advocate is appointed as Mediator

to mediate between the parties.

Parties are directed to appear before the

learned Mediator on 15.12.2023 at 1:00 PM, in the main

Mediation Center, H.P. High Court, who is requested to

submit his report within a period of four weeks thereafter.

List thereafter.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
Brahmi Devi vs. Rattan Chand

RSA No.85 of 2008

08.12.2023 Present: Mr. Anand Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr.
Karan Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.

Mr. Jeevan Kumar, Advocate, for the
respondent.

Learned counsel for the respondent prays for

adjournment on the ground that arguing counsel is not

available.

As prayed, list after four weeks.

( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge

8th December, 2023

(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
Muni Lal vs. State of H.P. & others.

RSA No.299 of 2008

08.12.2023 Present: Ms. Kritika Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Sumit
Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.

Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate
General, for the respondents.

Learned counsel for the appellant prays for

adjournment on the ground that arguing counsel is not

available.

As prayed, list after four weeks.

( Sushil
Kukreja )

Judge

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
State of H.P. & Ors. vs. Ram Chand & Ors.

CMP(M) No.662 of 2023

07.12.2023 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate
General, for the appellants/State.

Mr. Romesh Verma, Senior Advocate with Mr.
Sumit Sharma, Advocate, for respondent
No.1.

Mr. Adarsh K. Vashist, Advocate, for
rrespondents No.2 & 3.

Rejoinder stands filed.

Learned Additional Advocate General is

directed to file supplementary affidavit within a period of

two weeks. List thereafter.

( Sushil Kukreja
)
Judge

7th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
Ramesh Chand vs. Rashi Devi (deceased)
through her LRs and others.

                                                         RSA         No.484         of
                          2000





07.12.2023   Present:     Mr. S.D. Gill, Advocate, for the appellant.

                          Mr. Het Ram Thakur, Advocate,                            for

respondents No.12,3 and 6(a) to 6(c).

r to
As per report of the Registry, steps for the

service of respondents No.7(a)(i) to 7(a)(iii) of deceased

respondent No.7(a), have not been taken.

Learned counsel for the appellant undertakes

to do the needful within a period of two weeks. After

doing the needful within the aforesaid period, let notice be

issued to aforesaid respondents No.7(a)(i) to 7(a)(iii) of

deceased respondent No.7(a), returnable within four

weeks thereafter. List thereafter.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

7th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
OIC Ltd. vs. Anil Kumar & Ors.

FAO No.153 of 2012

07.12.2023 Present: Mr. Ashwani K. Sharma, Senior Advocate
with Ms. Nisha, Advocate, for the appellant.

Mr. Atul G. Sood, Advocate, for respondent
No.1.

Mr. Rajesh Kashyap, Advocate, for
respondent No.2.

Respondent No.3, already ex parte.

Arguments heard. Judgment reserved.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

7th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
Manjeet Kumar vs. Bhuma Devi and Ors.

                                                         RSA         No.174         of





                          2023

07.12.2023   Present:     Mr. Vinod     Chauhan, Advocate,                 for     the





                          appellant.

Mr. Ashok K. Tyagi, Advocate, for the
respondents.

r to
Learned counsel for the appellant submits

that an application for extension of time to deposit the

amount has been filed in the Registry of this Court,

however, the same is not on record. Registry to trace and

place the same on record, if in order. List thereafter.

( Sushil Kukreja

)
Judge

7th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
Dugla (deceased) through LRs Rahel
Singh and others vs. Chaman Lal

(deceased) through LRs.

                                                             RSA       No.423         of
                          2002





07.12.2023   Present:     Mr. Divya Raj Singh, Advocate, for the
                          appellants.

Mr. Pranjal Munjal, Advocate vice Mr. Janesh
Gupta, Advocate, for respondents No.1(a) to
1(d), 2 to 6, 8 & 9.

Appeal against respondent No.16(b) abated.

Respondents No.7(c), 7(e), 10(b) and 10(c),
11 to 15, 16(a), 16(d), 16(e), 16(f), 17, 18(a)
to 18(e), 19 to 21, 22(a) to 22(c) and 23 to
27, are ex parte.

As per report of the Registry, steps for the

service of respondents No.7(a), 7(b), 7(d), 16(c), 10(i)(a)

to 10(i)(d), have not been taken.

Learned counsel for the appellants

undertakes to do the needful within a period of two

weeks. After doing the needful within the aforesaid

period, let notice be issued to aforesaid respondents

No.7(a), 7(b), 7(d), 16(c), 10(i)(a) to 10(i)(d), returnable

within four weeks thereafter.

List after four weeks.

( Sushil Kukreja
)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
Judge

    7th December, 2023





         (reena)





              r          to









                          ::: Downloaded on - 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS

Sohan Singh (deceased) through LRs &
Ors. vs. Tarsem Singh

                                                        RSA         No.362         of
                         2007





07.12.2023   Present:    Mr. Ashwani K. Sharma, Senior Advocate

with Ms. Nisha, Advocate, for the appellants.

Mr. K.B. Khajuria, Advocate, for respondents

No.1 & 2.

rNone for remaining respondents.

Learned counsel for the appellants states at

bar that respondent No.1 has expired. He prays for and

is granted four weeks’ time to take consequential steps on

account of death of aforesaid respondent No.1.

List after four weeks.

( Sushil Kukreja
)
Judge

7th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
Smt. Urmila Gian Bharti vs.Shri Inder
Singh

                                                            RSA         No.602         of
                           2009





07.12.2023   Present:      Ms. Seema Guleria, Advocate,                       for     the
                           appellant.

                           Mr. Dinesh        Kumar,        Advocate,          for     the





                           respondent.

Learned counsel for the parties jointly state

that the matter has been amicably settled inter se parties

to lis.

As jointly prayed, list this matter on

20.12.2023.

( Sushil Kukreja
)
Judge

7th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
State of H.P. vs. M/s Mohinder Singh a/w
connected matter

Arb. Case No.118/2016 a/w Arb. Case
No.42/2017

07.12.2023 Present: Ms. Ranjana Patial, Deputy Advocate
General, for the petitioner in Arb. Case
No.118/2016 and for the respondents in Arb.
Case No.42/2017.

Mr. Sumeet Raj Sharma, Advocate, for the
respondent in Arb. Case No.118/2016 and for
the petitioner in Arb. Case No. 42/2017.

At the request of learned Deputy Advocate

General, list this matter after four weeks.

( Sushil Kukreja

)
Judge

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
United India Insurance Company Ltd. vs.
Raksha Devi & Ors.

FAO No.355 of
2016

07.12.2023 Present: Mr. Ashwani K. Sharma, Senior Advocate
with Ms. Nisha, Advocate, for the appellant.

Mr. Malay Kaushal, Advocate, for

respondents No.1 to 6.

rNone for the remaining respondents.

At the request of learned counsel for the

appellant, list for final hearing on 26.12.2023 alongwith

CMP No.15428 of 2023.

( Sushil
Kukreja )

Judge

7th December, 2023

(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
Paras Ram vs. Cantonment Board
Subathu

RSA No.144 of
2022

07.12.2023 Present: Mr. N.K. Bhalla, Advocate, for the appellant.

Mr. Virbhadur Verma, Central Government
Standing Counsel, for the respondent.

r to
CMP No.7832 of 2022

Learned counsel for the applicant/appellant

submits that rejoinder has been filed on 6 th December

2023, however, the same is not on record. Registry is

directed to trace and place the same on record, if in order.

As prayed, list after two weeks.

In the meantime, interim order to continue.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

7th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
Yashwant Singh & others vs. Trilok Chand
& others.

RSA No.507 of
2010

07.12.2023 Present: Mr. Raj Negi, Advocate, for the appellants.

Ms. Kiran Negi, Advocate vice Mr. Rahul
Mahajan, Advocate, for respondents No.1,3

to 8, 10, 12 & 13.

rLearned vice counsel appearing on behalf of

the respondents prays for and is granted further four

weeks’ time to define the shares. List thereafter.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

7th December, 2023

(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
Shri Ram General Insurance Co. Ltd. vs.
Kanta Devi & Ors.

FAO No.286 of
2016

07.12.2023 Present: Mr. Ashwani Kaundal, Advocate, for the
appellant.

Ms. Suman Bhimta, Advocate vice Mr.

Naveen K. Bhardwaj, Advocate, for
respondents No.1 to 4.

CMP No.12307 of 2023

Learned counsel for the applicant/appellant

prays for and is granted one week’s more time to file

rejoinder. List thereafter.

( Sushil
Kukreja )

Judge

7th December, 2023

(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
Soma Devi & Anr. vs. Amarjeet Singh

RSA No.397 of

2019

07.12.2023 Present: Mr. B.S. Chauhan, Senior Advocate with Mr.

Ram Kumar, Advocate, for the appellants.

Ms. Devyani Sharma, Senior Advocate with
Mr. Basant Pal Thakur, Advocate, for the

respondent.

CMP No.8298 of 2019

Heard. Interim order dated 21.08.2019, is

made absolute during the pendency of the appeal,

however, subject to alteration, vacation and modification

on motion.

Application stands disposed of.

RSA No.397 of 2019

List for final hearing in the month of March,

2024.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
Sanjeev Suri and another vs. Promila Suri

RSA No.144 of

2020

07.12.2023 Present: Mr. Romesh Verma, Senior Advocate with Mr.

Hitesh Thakur, Advocate, for the appellants.

Mr. Naresh Sharma, Advocate, for the
respondent.

Learned counsel for the respondent prays for

and is granted further two weeks’ time to file Power of

Attorney.

As prayed, list on 21.12.2023.

( Sushil

Kukreja )
Judge

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
State of H.P. vs. Govind Nath & Ors.

Cr. Appeal No.179 of 2020

07.12.2023 Present: Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate
General, for the appellant.

Mr. K.B. Khajuria, Advocate, for respondents
No.1 & 2.

As per report of the Registry, proclamation

notice issued against respondent No.3, has been

received back duly executed.

At the request of learned Additional Advocate

General, list for consideration next week.

( Sushil

Kukreja )
Judge

7th December, 2023

(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
Chuni Lal (deceased) through LRs
Bhupinder Singh vs. Bimla Devi and Ors.

RSA No.86 of 2022

07.12.2023 Present: Mr. Pranjal Munjal, Advocate vice Mr. Janesh

Gupta, Advocate, for the appellants.

Ms. Kavita Kajal, Advocate vice Mr. Atharv
Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.1,3,

4(a), 4(b) & 7.

Ms. Vandana Kumari, Advocate vice Mr.
Sanjay Jaswal, Advocate, for respondents
No.8 & 9.

As per report of the Registry, fresh steps for

the service of respondent N.4(c), have not been taken.

Learned counsel for the appellants

undertakes to do the needful within a period of one week.

After doing the needful within the aforesaid period, let

notice be issued to aforesaid respondent N.4(c),

returnable within four weeks thereafter.

Dasti notice be also issued, as prayed.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

7th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
M/s Garg Sons Estate Promoters Pvt. Ltd.
vs. State of H.P. & another

Arbitration Case No.92 of
2022

07.12.2023 Present: Mr. Suneet Goel, Advocate, for the appellant.

Ms. Ranjna Patial, Deputy Advocate General,

for the respondents.

rLearned counsel for the appellant submits

that since an application filed by the appellant under

Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, is

still pending adjudication, therefore, the matter may be

adjourned to some other date.

In view of the aforesaid, list this matter after

three weeks.

( Sushil

Kukreja )
Judge

7th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
State of H.P. vs. Balbir Singh and others

RSA No.155 of 2022

07.12.2023 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate

General, for the appellant/State.

Mr. Sunny Modgil, Advocate, for respondents
No.1,2,3(i) to 3(v), 4(i) to 4(viii), 5,7,8(iv), 9,

10 (iv) to 10(vi), 12(a) o 12(e), 13(i) to 13(iii),
14, 16(i), 17 and 20.

None for respondents No.6,8(i), 8(ii), 10(i) to
10(iii), 10(vii), 11(i) to 11(iv), 15, 16(ii), 16(iii),

19 and 21 to 25,though served.

Name of respondent No.18 stands deleted.

CMP(M) Nos.168 and 169 of 2023.

No reply is intended to be filed to the instant

applications.

Heard. Having regard the avements made in

the applications, which are duly supported with the

affidavits of Raghav Sharma, Deputy Commissioner, Una,

District Una, H.P., the same are allowed and the proposed

legal representatives of deceased respondent No.12, as

mentioned in Para-4 of the application bearing CMP

No.168 of 2023, are ordered to be brought on record.

Amended memo of parties stands already

filed, which is ordered to be taken on record.

Applications stand disposed of

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
RSA No.155 of 2022

As prayed, list for hearing on admission after

two weeks.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

7th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
Kishan (deceased) through his LRs
Dharampal & others vs. Shiv Ram

(deceaed) through his LRs and Ors.

RSA No.254 of 2022

07.12.2023 Present: Mr. Kuldeep Singh Chandel, Advocate, for the
appellants.

None for respondents No.1(a) to 1(e).

Mr. Romesh Verma, Senior Advocate with Mr.
Hitesh Thakur, Advocate, for respondents
No.2 & 3.

RSA No.254 of 2022

As per report of the Registry, steps for the

service of respondents No.1(a) to 1(e), have not been

taken. Learned counsel for the appellants undertakes to

do the needful within a period of three days. After doing

the needful within the aforesaid period, let notice be

issued to aforesaid respondents No.1(a) to 1(e),

returnable within four weeks thereafter.

CMP No.12011 of 2022

Learned counsel for respondents No.2 & 3,

prays for and is granted four weeks’ further time to file

reply. List thereafter.

In the meantime, interim order to continue.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
7th December, 2023

         (reena)






              r          to









                          ::: Downloaded on - 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS

Bakshish Singh and others vs. Chanan
Singh and another.

RSA No.283 of 2022

07.12.2023 Present: Mr. Arun Raj, Advocate, for the appellants.

Mr. Rajesh Kashyap, Advocate, for the
respondents.

2022

r to
RSA No.283 of 2022 & CMP No.14041 of

Learned counsel for the respondents prays

for and is granted three weeks’ time to file Power of

Attorney as well as reply to the stay application.

In the meantime, execution of the impugned

judgment and decree dated 09.06.2022, passed by

learned Additional District Judge-II, Una, District Una, H.P.

in Civil Appeal No.06/2022, shall remain stayed.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

7th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
Amar Chand vs. Sunil Kumar & others.

RSA No.46 of 2023

07.12.2023 Present: Mr. Nimish Gupta, Advocate, for the

appellant.

Mr. Harmender Singh Chandel, Advocate, for
respondents No.1 to 5.

r to
CMP Nos. 688 & 689 of 2023

As per report of the Registry, steps for the

service of LRs of deceased respondents No.6 & 14, have

not been taken. Learned counsel for the

applicant/appellant undertakes to do the needful within a

period of one week. On doing the needful within the

aforesaid period, let notice be issued to the proposed LRs

of deceased respondents No.6 & 14, returnable within

four weeks thereafter.

CMP No.10903 of 2023

Reply stands filed.

As prayed, list for consideration after four

weeks.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

7th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
National Highway Authority of India vs.
Jagdish Kumar & another

OMP(M) No.57 of 2023

07.12.2023 Present: Mr. Sumeet Raj Sharma, Advocate, for the
appellant.

Mr. Amit Singh Chandel, Advocate, for the

respondents.

r Learned counsel for the respondents prays

for and is granted two weeks’ time to file reply. List

thereafter.

( Sushil
Kukreja )

Judge

7th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
Virender Singh & Ors. vs. Virender
Chauhan & Ors.

RSA No.109 of
2023

07.12.2023 Present: Mr. Abhinav Purohit, Advocate, for the
appellants.

Mr. Pranjal Munjal, Advocate vice Mr.
Vedhant Ranta, Advocate, for the
rrespondents.

CMP No.5557 of 2023

Learned counsel for the appellants prays for

adjournment.

As prayed, list after two weeks.

( Sushil

Kukreja )
Judge

7th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
Dhamwari Power Co. Pvt. Ltd. vs. State of
H.P. & another alongwith Arb. Appeal No.1

of 2023.

Arbitration Case No.316 of 2023 a/w
Arbitration Appeal No.1 of 2023

07.12.2023 Present: Mr. Suneet Goel, Advocate, for the
petitioner(s) in both the cases.

Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate
rGeneral, for the respondent/State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) prays for

and is granted one week’s further time to file rejoinder.

List thereafter.

( Sushil
Kukreja )

Judge

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
Purkhu Ram vs. CBI

Cr. Appeal No.235 of

2023

07.12.2023 Present: Mr. Mohan Singh, Advocate, for the appellant.

Mr. A.K. Bansal, Advocate, for the
respondent.

Cr.MP No.1996 of 2023

rLearned counsel for the applicant/appellant

prays for adjournment.

As prayed, list on 21.12.2023.

( Sushil
Kukreja )

Judge

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
Tashi Phunchog vs. CBI

Cr. Appeal No.480 of

2023

07.12.2023 Present: Ms. Kavita Kajal, Advocate vice Mr. Sambhav

Bhasin, Advocate, for the appellant.


                         Mr. A.K. Bansal,        Advocate,           for      the
                         respondent/CBI


                        r          to
                         Cr.MP No.4019 of 2023

Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of

the applicant/appellant prays for adjournment.

As prayed, list on 21.12.2023.

( Sushil

Kukreja )
Judge

7th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
NIC vs. Riya & Ors.

FAO No.16 of 2015

06.12.2023 Present: Ms. Sunita Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr.
Ranbir Singh, Advocate, for the appellant.

Ms. Anu Tuli Azta, Advocate, for respondents
No.1 & 2.

Issue notice to respondent No.3, returnable

for 02.01.2024, on taking steps within a period of five

days. List thereafter.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

6th December, 2023

(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
OIC Ltd. vs. Satya Devi and others.

CMP Nos.8642 & 8643 of 2023 in FAO

No.249 of 2010

06.12.2023 Present: Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for the non-

applicant/ appellant.

Mr. Surender K. Sharma, Advocate, for
applicants/respondents No.2 & 3.

r to
CMP No.8642 of 2023

The present application under Order 32 Rule

12 of the Code of Civil Procedure, has been maintained

by applicants/respondents No.2 & 3, namely Neha and

Sneha, for discharging their natural guardian.

2. Learned counsel for the non-

applicant/appellant submits that he does not intend to file

any reply to the present application and has no objection,

in case, the same is allowed.

3. Heard. Since the applicants/respondents

No.2 & 3, namely Neha and Sneha, have attained the age

of majority, as is evident from their Matriculation

Certificates annexed with the application as Annexures A-

1 & A-2, the present application is allowed and their

natural guardian, i.e. their mother, respondent No.1,

Satya Devi, is discharged from their guardianship and

they are allowed to pursue the case in their own capacity.

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS

The application stands disposed of.

CMP No.8643 of 2023

4. The present application under Section 151 of

the Code of Civil Procedure, has been maintained by

applicants/respondents No.2 & 3, namely Neha and

Sneha, for release of entire compensation amount in their

favour, which is lying deposited in the Registry of this

Court.

5. It has been mentioned in the application that

applicants/respondents No.2 & 3, namely Neha and

Sneha, have now attained the age of majority and are in

dire need of money to meet out their day to day

household and education expenses, as such, the entire

amount of compensation falling in their shares, be

released to them.

6. Learned counsel for the non-

applicant/appellant has submitted that he has no

objection in case the amount of compensation falling in

the shares of applicants/respondents No.2 & 3, lying

deposited in the Registry of this Court, is released in their

favour, as the award has attained finality and no appeal

has been preferred against the judgment dated

02.09.2016, passed by this Court in FAO No.249 of 2010.

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS

7. Having regard to the averments made in the

application, which are duly supported with affidavits of

both the applicants as well as taking into consideration

the fact that the matter has been finally decided by this

Court vide judgment dated 02.09.2016 and since no

appeal whatsoever has been filed by either of the parties

in the superior court of law against the aforesaid

judgment, the same has attained finality, as such, the

present application is allowed and the entire amount of

compensation falling in the shares of

applicants/respondents No.2 & 3, namely Neha and

Sneha alongwith up-to-date interest, which is lying

deposited in the registry of this Court, is ordered to be

released in their favour, by remitting the same in their

saving bank accounts, after due verification, details

whereof have been given in Para-4 of the application.

The application stands disposed of.

                                           (                   Sushil
                                      Kukreja )
                                                     Judge

    6th December, 2023
         (reena)




                                       ::: Downloaded on - 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS

Dinesh Chona vs. Om Prakash & Ors.

RSA No.183 of 2022

06.12.2023 Present: Mr. Nimish Gupta, Advocate, for the
appellant.

Mr. Goldy Kumar, Advocate, for respondent
No.1.

Respondents No.2 to 5, are already ex parte.

r to
RSA No.183 of 2022

Heard. Admit on the substantial questions of

law No.(a),(b), (d) & (e), formulated at Page No.10 of the

paper book.

Notice. Mr. Goldy Kumar, learned counsel,

appears and waives service of post admission notice on

behalf of respondent No.1.

Let post admission notice be issued to

respondents No.2 to 5, returnable within six weeks, on

taking steps within five days. List thereafter.

CMP No.9490 of 2022

Heard. Interim order dated 18.07.2022, is

made absolute during the pendency of the appeal,

however, subject to alteration, vacation and modification on

motion.

Application stands disposed of.

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS

( Sushil
Kukreja )

                                         Judge





    6th December, 2023
         (reena)





              r          to









                           ::: Downloaded on - 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS

Dinesh Chona vs. Om Prakash & Ors.

RSA No.183 of 2022

06.12.2023 Present: Mr. Nimish Gupta, Advocate, for the
appellant.

Mr. Goldy Kumar, Advocate, for respondent
No.1.

Respondents No.2 to 5, are already ex parte.

r to
RSA No.183 of 2022

Heard. Admit on the substantial questions of

law No.(a),(b), (d) & (e), formulated at Page No.10 of the

paper book.

Notice. Mr. Goldy Kumar, learned counsel,

appears and waives service of post admission notice on

behalf of respondent No.1.

Let post admission notice be issued to

respondents No.2 to 5, returnable within six weeks, on

taking steps within five days. List thereafter.

CMP No.9490 of 2022

Heard. Interim order dated 18.07.2022, is

made absolute during the pendency of the appeal,

however, subject to alteration, vacation and modification on

motion.

Application stands disposed of.

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS

( Sushil
Kukreja )

                                         Judge





    6th December, 2023
         (reena)





              r          to









                           ::: Downloaded on - 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS

Jyoti Sharma vs. Harish Thakur

RSA No.30 of 2023

06.12.2023 Present: Mr. Jagmohan Singh Chandel, Advocate, for
the appellant.

Mr. Parshant, Advocate vice Mr. H.S.
Chandel, Advocate, for the respondent.

Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of

the respondent prays for adjournment.

As prayed, list after two weeks.

( Sushil

Kukreja )
Judge

6th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
Beli Ram vs. State of H.P. & Ors.

RSA No.194 of 2023

06.12.2023 Present: Mr. Sudhir Thakur, Senior Advocate with Mr.
Somesh Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.

Ms. Ranjana Patial, Deputy Advocate
General, for respondents No.1,2 &4 /State.

Ms. Sunita Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr.

Dhananjay Sharma, Advocate, for respondent
No.3.

RSA No.194 of 2023

Heard. Admit on the substantial questions of

law No.1,2,6 & 8, formulated at Page Nos.12 & 13 of the

paper book.

List for final hearing in due course.

CMP No.11241 of 2023

Heard.

The parties are directed to maintain status

quo qua nature and possession of the suit land during the

pendency of the present appeal.

Application stands disposed of.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

6th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
Madan Lal & others vs. Rattan Chand &
others.

RSA No.281 of 2019

06.12.2023 Present: None for the appellants.

Respondent No.1, is stated to have expired.

Respondents No.2,3 & 4, are ex parte.

RSA No.281 of 2019 & CMP No.5679 of
2019

Since none has appeared on behalf of the

appellants despite repeated calls, in the interest of justice,

list after four weeks.

( Sushil
Kukreja )

Judge

6th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
Mohar Singh and others vs. Pritam Dass
and others.

RSA No.177 of 2003

06.12.2023 Present: Mr. Pranjal Munjal, Advocate vice Mr. Janesh

Gupta, Advocate, for the appellants.

Mr. Rahul, Advocate, for respondent No.1.

Respondents No.2 to 5, 7, 9, 10, 12 and 13

are ex parte.

Names of respondents No.6,8 & 11 stand
deleted.

Learned counsel vice counsel appearing on

behalf of the appellants prays for adjournment on the

ground that arguing counsel is not available today.

As prayed, list after four weeks.

( Sushil
Kukreja )

Judge

6th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
Surinder Singh and Ors. vs. Kishan Chand
& Ors.

RSA No.387 of 2005

06.12.2023 Present: Mr. H.R. Thakur, Advocate, for the appellants.

Mr. Karan Sharma, Advocate, for respondent
No.1.

Learned counsel for the appellants prays for

adjournment on the ground that arguing counsel is pre-

occupied in another Court.

As prayed, list after four weeks.

( Sushil
Kukreja )

Judge

6th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
Anju Kumari vs. State of H.P. & Anr.

Cr.MP(M) No.1296 of

2023

06.12.2023 Present: Ms. Ambika Kotwal, Advocate, for the

petitioner.

Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate
General, for respondent No.1/State.

Mr. Dalip K. Sharma, Advocate, for
respondent No.2.

Learned Additional Advocate General prays

for adjournment to have instructions in the matter as to

whether the charge-sheet in the case has been filed or

not.

As prayed, list after two weeks.

( Sushil

Kukreja )
Judge

6th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
Krishna Devi vs. Dini

CMP(M) No.1650 of

2023

06.12.2023 Present: Mr. Pawan Gautam, Advocate, for the

applicant/appellant.

Issue notice to the respondent, returnable

within six weeks, on taking steps within a period of five

days. List thereafter.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

6th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
Ramesh Kumar vs. Om Parkash

CMP(M) No.1652 of

2023

06.12.2023 Present: Mr. Surinder Saklani, Advocate, for the

applicant/appellant.

Issue notice to the respondent, returnable

within six weeks, on taking steps within a period of five

days. List thereafter.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

6th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
Ram Krishan vs. State of H.P.

Cr.MP(M) No.2722 of

2023

06.12.2023 Present: Mr. Hemant Kumar Thakur, Advocate, for the

petitioner.

Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate
General, for the respondent/State.

ASI Suneel Kumar, P.S. Sadar, District
Bilaspur, H.P., present with record.

Status report stands filed.

Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for

adjournment to go through the same.

As prayed, list on 13.12.2023.

( Sushil

Kukreja )
Judge

6th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
Kuldeep Verma @ Boss vs. State of H.P.

Cr.MP(M) No.2909 of 2023

06.12.2023 Present: Mr. Harish Sharma, Advocate, for the
petitioner.

Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate
General, for the respondent/State.

ASI Rakesh Kumar, P.S. Dhalli, present with

record.

Status report stands filed.

Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for

adjournment to go through the same.

As prayed, list on 20.12.2023.

( Sushil
Kukreja )

Judge

6th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
Sadiq Mohammed vs. State of H.P.

Cr.MP(M) No.2921 of

2023

06.12.2023 Present: Mr. R.S. Chandel, Advocate, for the

petitioner.

Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate
General, for the respondent/State.

ASI Yashpal Singh, P.S. Kihar, present with
record.

Status report stands filed.

Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for

adjournment to go through the same.

As prayed, list on 21.12.2023.

( Sushil

Kukreja )
Judge

6th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
Inder Dev Sharma vs. Kamlesh Kumar &
Anr.

RSA No.276 of
2023

06.12.2023 Present: Mr. Sanjeev Kuthiala, Senior Advocate with
Ms. Ankita, Advocate, for the appellant.

RSA No.276 of 2023

Issue notice to the respondents, returnable

with six weeks, on taking steps within a period of five

days. List thereafter.

CMP No.18165 of 2023

Notice in the aforesaid terms. Reply, if any,

be filed within six weeks.

In the meantime, respondents are restrained

from closing the ingress and egress to the land and also,

the parties are directed to maintain status quo qua nature

and possession of the suit land.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

6th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
Sudhir Kumar Thapa vs. Ashwani Kumar

RSA No.277 of

2023

06.12.2023 Present: Mr. Deepak Bhasin, Senior Advocate with Mr.

Sambhav Bhasin Advocate, for the appellant.

RSA No.277 of 2023

Issue notice to the respondents, returnable

with six weeks, on taking steps within a period of five

days. List thereafter.

CMP No.18166 of 2023

Notice in the aforesaid terms. Reply, if any,

be filed within six weeks.

In the meantime, execution of the judgment

and decree dated 30.09.2023, passed by learned District

Judge, Kangra at Dharamshala in Civil Appeal No.16-

D/XIII/2022, shall remain stayed.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

6th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
H.P. Bus Stands Management &
Development Authority vs. M/s Prashanti

Surya Construction Company.

Arbitration Appeal No.34 of 2023

06.12.2023 Present: Mr. Mohit Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.

Mr. Sunil Mohan Goel, Advocate, for the
caveator/respondent No.1.

Ms. Ranjana Patial, Deputy Advocate
General, for respondent No.2/State.

OMP No.586 of 2023

Reply stands filed.

Learned counsel for the applicant/appellant

prays for and is granted one week’s time to file rejoinder.

List thereafter alongwith main appeal.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

6th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
Ajay Kumar & Anr. vs. Chuhru Ram

RSA No.137 of

2022

06.12.2023 Present: Mr. Y.P. Sood, Advocate, for the appellants.

Mr. Dheeraj K. Vashishat, Advocate, for the
respondent.

Heard. Admit on the substantial questions of

law No.1,2,3 & 5, formulated at Page Nos.16 & 17 of the

paper book.

List for final hearing in due course.

( Sushil

Kukreja )
Judge

6th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
Dhyan Dass and ors. vs. Puran Dassi

RSA No.398 of

2022

06.12.2023 Present: Mr. Ravi Kumar, Advocate vice Mr. Maan

Singh, Advocate, for the appellants.

Mr. Yash Sharma, Advocate, for the
respondent.

CMP No.18386 of 2022

By way of indulgence, last opportunity of two

weeks, as prayed for, is granted to learned counsel for the

respondent to file reply.

In the meantime, interim order to continue.

List alongwith main appeal.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

6th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
Chain Lal & Anr. Vs. Mohinder Chand

RSA No.279 of 2007

05.12.2023 Present: Mr. Ashwani Negi, Advocate vice Mr. Raman
Sethi, Advocate, for the appellants.

Mr. Ajay Kumar, Senior Advocate with Mr.
Rohit, Advocate, for the respondent.

Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of

the appellants prays for adjournment on the ground that

arguing counsel is not available.

As prayed, list on 21.12.2023.

( Sushil
Kukreja )

Judge

5th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
Devi Chand vs. M/s Chirchind Hydro
Power Ltd. & Anr.

RSA No.230 of
2023

05.12.2023 Present: Mr. Surender K. Sharma, Advocate, for the
appellant.

Issue notice to the respondents, returnable

within six weeks, on taking steps within a period of five

days. List thereafter.

( Sushil

Kukreja )
Judge

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
Bhangi Ram @ Balkrishan & Ors. vs.
Kehar Singh.

RSA No.471 of
2010

05.12.2023 Present: Mr. J.R. Poswal, Advocate, for the appellants.

Proposed LR 1(a) of deceased respondent
already ex parte.

Mr. Sanjay Dutt Vasudeva, Advocate, for
proposed LR 1(b) of deceased respondent.

Mr. Ashok Chaudhary, Advocate for proposed

LR No.1(c) to 1(e) of deceased respondent.

CMP(M) Nos.927 & 928 of 2023.

Learned counsel for proposed LR No.1(b)

and proposed LR Nos.1(c) to 1(e) pray for and are

granted four weeks’ time to file reply. List thereafter.

( Sushil
Kukreja )

Judge

5th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
Tilla Devi vs. Tule Ram & Ors.

RSA No.581 of

2010

05.12.2023 Present: Mr.Ashok Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr.

Abhishek Sood, Advocate, for the appellant.

None for respondent No.1.

Ms. Ankita, Advocate, for proposed LRs

No.2(i) to 2(v) of respondent No.2.

CMP No.17822 of 2023

Heard. Having regard to the averments

made in the application, the same is allowed.

Application stands disposed of.

RSA No.581 of 2010

List of final hearing in the month of January,

2024.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

5th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
Sunita & Ors. vs. Parkash Chand & Ors.
a/w connected matter.

FAOs No.89 & 120 of
2016

FAO No.89 of 2016

05.12.2023 Present: Mr. Vinay Thakur, Advocate, for the
appellants.

r to
Mr.Ashok Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr.
Abhishek Sood, Advocate, for respondents
No.1& 2.

Mr. Ashwani K. Sharma, Senior Advocate
with Mr. Nishant Kumar, Advocate, for
respondent No.3.

FAO No.120 of 2016

Mr. Ashwani K. Sharma, Senior Advocate
with Mr. Nishant Kumar, Advocate, for the

appellant.

Mr. Vinay Thakur, Advocate, for respondents
No.5 & 6.

CMP No.1187 of 2023 in FAO No.120 of
2016

No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the

non-applicants/respondents and they have no objection, in

case, the instant application is allowed.

Hence, in view of the averments made in the

application, the same is allowed and the name of deceased

respondent No.1, Sunita, is ordered to be deleted from the

array of the parties, subject to all just exceptions.

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS

Amended memo of parties stands already filed,

which is ordered to be taken on record.

Application stands disposed of.

FAOs No.89 & 120 of 2016

two weeks.

r to
As jointly prayed, list for final hearing after

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

5th December, 2023

(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
Sunder Singh (deceased) through his LRs
Nitu Singh and others vs. Roop Singh and

another

RSA No.594 of 2019 a/w Cross Objections
No.32 of 2020

05.12.2023 Present: Ms. Ankita, Advocate, for the appellants/non-

cross-objectors.

Mr. Romesh Verma, Senior Advocate with Mr.
Hitesh Thakur, Advocate, for respondent
No.1/cross-objector.

None for respondent No.2.

CMP No.17202 of 2023

Learned counsel for non-applicant/respondent

No.1, prays for and is granted four weeks’ time to file reply.

In the meantime, Registry is directed to accept a

sum of Rs.1 lac, which the applicants are intending to deposit

by way of demand draft, photocopy of which has been filed

with the application, as Annexure A-1.

In order to show their bonafide, the applicants

are further directed to deposit the entire amount of up-to-date

interest, as directed by this Court vide order dated 5 th March,

2021, within a period of four weeks.

As prayed, list after four weeks.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
Nand Lal & Anr. vs. Hukum
Chand(deceased) through LR

RSA No.294 of 2019

05.12.2023 Present: Mr. Romesh Verma, Senior Advocate with Mr.

Hitesh Thakur, Advocate, for the appellants.

CMP(M) No.1670 of 2023

Let notice be issued to proposed LRs.No.1(a) to

1(e) of deceased respondent, as mentioned in Para-5 of the

application, returnable within six weeks, on taking steps within

a period of five days. List thereafter.

( Sushil

Kukreja )
Judge

5th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
Roshan Lal vs. Tulsi Ram & Ors.

RSA No.476 of 2019

05.12.2023 Present: Ms. Meena Devi, Advocate, for the appellant.

Mr. Suneet Goel, Advocate, for respondent
No.2.

None for respondents No.1(a) to 1(c), 3(d),
3(e), 7(a)(i) to 7(a)(iii), 7(b), 8(a) to 8(d), 8(e)

(i), 8(e)(ii), 11(a)(i) to 11(a)(iii), 11(b) to 11(d),
11(g)(i) t 11(g)(iii) and 11(h).

RSA No.476 of 2019 a/w CMP Nos.11360 &

11361/2019

Learned counsel for the appellant prays for

adjournment.

As prayed, list after two weeks.

( Sushil

Kukreja )
Judge

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
Bhagi Rath vs. Parkash Chand & Another

CMP No.4584 of 2019

05.12.2023 Present: Mr. Romesh Verma, Senior Advocate with Mr.
Hitesh Thakur, Advocate, for the applicant.

Mr. K.D. Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr.
Rahul Gathania, Advocate, for the non-
applicants/respondents.

Learned counsel for the applicant prays for and

is granted ten days’ time to file an appropriate application to

prove the photographs.

As prayed, list after two weeks.

( Sushil
Kukreja )

Judge

5th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
M/s Hill Construction & Engineer Co. vs.
State of H.P. & Anr.

Arbitration Case No.38 of
2021

05.12.2023 Present: Mr. Sumeet Raj Sharma, Advocate, for the
petitioner.

Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate

General, for the respondents.

Learned Additional Advocate General prays for

and is granted four weeks’ time to file reply. List thereafter.

Registry is directed to reflect the name of office

of Advocate General in the cause-list, henceforth.

( Sushil

Kukreja )
Judge

5th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
Chaudhary Ram vs. Ranja Ram
(deceased) through his LRs & Ors.

RSA No.158 of 2021

05.12.2023 Present: Mr. Mukesh, Advocate vice Mr. Rajiv Raj,

Advocate, for the appellant.

Mr. Malay Kaushal, Advocate, for
respondents No.1(a) to 1(f) and 2(a) to 2(d).

None for respondents No.3(a), 3(b), 4(a) to
4(d), 5 & 7.

CMP No.11250 of 2021

Learned counsel for the applicant/appellant

prays for and is granted two weeks’ time to file rejoinder.

List thereafter.

( Sushil

Kukreja )
Judge

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
Bali Ram & another vs. Balbir Singh

RSA No.175 of 2021

05.12.2023 Present: Mr. Yash Sharma, Advocate, for the
appellants.

Mr. Naveen Kumar Dass, Advocate, for the
respondent.

RSA No.175 of 2021 & CMP No.5674 of
2022

Learned counsel for the appellants submits

that the matter has been amicably settled inter se parties.

Learned counsel for the respondent prays for

and is granted two weeks’ time to have instructions in the

matter. List thereafter.

( Sushil
Kukreja )

Judge

5th December, 2023

(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
Subhash Chand Jamwal vs. Yogesh
Verma

Cr.MP(M) No.94 of 2022

05.12.2023 Present: Mr. Anil Kapoor, Advocate vice Mr. Virender

Singh Rathore, Advocate, for the applicant.

Mr. Mukul Sood, Advocate, for the
respondent.

r to
Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of

the applicant prays for and is granted two weeks’ time to

file rejoinder. List thereafter.

( Sushil
Kukreja )

Judge

5th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
Sudeh Kumar vs. UOI & others

RSA No.212 of

2023

05.12.2023 Present: Mr. Ashok Kumar Thakur Advocate, for the

appellant.

Mr. Virbhadur Verma, Central Government
Counsel, for respondents No.1 & 2.

Ms. Kanta Devi, Advocate, for respondent
No.3.

RSA No.212 of 2023

Heard. Admit on the substantial questions of

law No.5 & 6, formulated at Page No.16 of the paper

book.

List for final hearing in due course.

( Sushil

Kukreja )
Judge

5th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
Prakash Chand vs. Jeet Ram

RSA No.1 of 2022

05.12.2023 Present: Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate vice Mr.
Virender Singh Kanwar, Advocate, for the

appellant.

Mr. A.K. Sharma, Advocate, for the
respondent.

CMP No.12023 of 2023

Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of

the applicant/appellant prays for and is granted two

weeks’ time to file rejoinder. List thereafter.

( Sushil
Kukreja )

Judge

5th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
Santosh Kumar & others vs. Brij Bala
Sood.

RSA No.224 of
2022

05.12.2023 Present: None for the appellants.

Mr. Vijender Katoch, Advocate, for the
respondent.

RSA No.224 of 2022 & CMP No.11098 of
2022

Since none has appeared on behalf of the

appellants despite repeated calls, in the interest of justice,

list after four weeks.

( Sushil

Kukreja )
Judge

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
Surender Kumar Gupta vs. Bahadur Singh

RSA No.321 of 2022

05.12.2023 Present: Mr. Deepak Kaushal, Senior Advocate with
Mr. Abhishek Verma, Advocate, for the

appellant.

Mr. Karan Singh Kanwar, Advocate, for the
respondent.

RSA No.321 of 2022

Heard. Admit on the substantial questions of

law No.1,2 &3, formulated at Page No.11 of the paper

book.

List for final hearing in due course.

CMP No.15903 of 2022

Heard. Interim order dated 17.11.2022, is

made absolute during the pendency of the appeal,

however, subject to alteration, vacation and modification on

motion.

Application stands disposed of.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
State of H.P. vs. Mohar Singh

Cr. Appeal No.326 of

2023

05.12.2023 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate

General, for the appellant.

Mr. Vinod Thakur, Advocate, for the
respondent.

r to
Learned counsel for the respondent prays for

and is granted two weeks’ time to file Power of Attorney. List

thereafter.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

5th December, 2023

(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
Anant Ram (deceased) through his LRs
Raj Pal and others vs. Janak Raj

RSA No.135 of 2020

05.12.2023 Present: Mr. K.D. Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr.

Rahul Gathania, Advocate, for the appellants.

Mr. N.K. Thakur, Senior Advocate with Mr.
Karan Veer Singh, Advocate, for the

respondent.

Learned counsel for the parties jointly pray

for adjournment.

As prayed, list after two weeks.

In the meantime, record of RSA No.681 of

2008, be also called for.

( Sushil
Kukreja )

Judge

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
Hari Dutt and others vs. Mandir Kalisthan,
Nahan

RSA No.110 of 2022

05.12.2023 Present: Mr. Karan Singh Kanwar, Advocate, for the
appellants.

Mr. K.D. Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr.
Rahul Gathania, Advocate, for the
respondent.

2023 r to
RSA No.110 of 2022 & CMP No.14630 of

Learned counsel for the respondent prays for

adjournment.

As prayed, list after two weeks.

( Sushil

Kukreja )
Judge

5th December, 2023

(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
Label Chand vs. Surat Ram & Ors.

RSA No.103 of 2008

05.12.2023 Present: Mr. Mukul Sood, Advocate, for the appellant.

Name of respondent No.1, stands deleted.

Mr. Vinod Gupta, Advocate, for respondent
No.2.

Mr. Anand Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr.
Karan Sharma, Advocate, for respondents
rNo.3 to 5.

Learned counsel for the appellant prays for

adjournment.

As prayed, list after two weeks.

( Sushil
Kukreja )

Judge

5th December, 2023

(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:28:59 :::CIS
Bakshish Singh vs. Sukh Lal & others a/w
connected matter.

RSA Nos.546 and 547 of 2010

RSA No.546 of 2010
05.12.2023 Present: Mr. Shekhar Badola, Advocate vice Mr. Parav

Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.

Mr. Basant Pal Thakur, Advocate, for
respondent No.1.

Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate
General, for respondents No.2 & 3.

None for respondents No.4 to 6, 8 & 9.

Name of respondent No.7, stands deleted.

RSA No.547 of 2010

Mr. Shekhar Badola, Advocate vice Mr. Parav

Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.

Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate
General, for respondents No.1 & 2.

Mr. Basant Pal Thakur, Advocate, for

respondent No.3.

None for respondents No.4 to 6, 8 & 9.

Name of respondent No.7, stands deleted.

Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of

the appellant prays for adjournment on the ground that

arguing counsel is not available.

As prayed, list after four weeks.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
5th December, 2023
(reena)

r to

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
Ram Pal vs. Sheela Devi (deceased)
through LRs and others

RSA No.118 of 2021

05.12.2023 Present: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Ms.
Kavita Kajal, Advocate, for the appellant.

Mr. N.K. Thakur, Senior Advocate with Mr.
Karanveer Singh Thakur, Advocate for
respondents No.1(c), 1(e) and 1(f).

Respondents No.1(a)1(b), 1(d), 1(g), 3,4(a) to
4(d) and 5 to 9 proceeded ex parte.

Name of respondent No.2 stands deleted.

RSA No.118 of 2021

Heard. Admit on the substantial question of

law No.2, formulated at Page No.12 of the paper book.

List for final hearing in due course.

CMP No.8425 of 2021

Heard. Interim order dated 29.07.2021, is

made absolute during the pendency of the appeal.

Application stands disposed of.

CMP No.8424 of 2021

The application is disposed of with a direction

to the applicant to file certified copy of the judgment and

decree passed by learned Trial Court, dated 13.08.2010

in Civil Suit No.10 of 1996, within four weeks.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
5th December, 2023

         (reena)






              r          to









                          ::: Downloaded on - 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS

Sunil Kumar vs. State of H.P.

Cr. Appeal No.582 of

2010

05.12.2023 Present: Mr. Khashitiz, Advocate vice Mr. Dinesh

Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.

Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate
General, for the respondent/State.

Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of

the appellant prays for adjournment on the ground that

arguing counsel is not available.

As prayed, list after four weeks.

( Sushil

Kukreja )
Judge

5th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
OIC Ltd.vs. Madhu & Ors.

FAO No.36 of 2015

05.12.2023 Present: Ms. Meera Devi, Advocate, for the appellant.

Mr. Rajesh Kashyap, Advocate, for the
respondents.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

r to
appellant prays for adjournment.

As prayed, list after two weeks.

( Sushil
Kukreja )

Judge

5th December, 2023

(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
Ranjeet Singh vs. State of H.P. a/w
connected matter

Cr. Appeal No.361 of 2020 a/w Cr. Appeal
No.169 of 2019

05.12.2023 Present: None for the appellant.

Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate
General, for the respondent/State.

Since none has appeared on behalf of the

appellant despite repeated calls, in the interest of justice,

list after four weeks.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

5th December, 2023

(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
Jaggu vs. State of H.P.

Cr. Appeal No.114 of

2022

05.12.2023 Present: Mr. Kishore Pundir, Advocate as Legal Aid

Counsel, for the appellant.

Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate
General, for the respondent.

r to
Cr.MP No.4039 of 2023

Learned Additional Advocate General prays for

and is granted further two weeks’ time to file reply/furnish

custody certificate.

As prayed, list on 21.12.2023.

( Sushil
Kukreja )

Judge

5th December, 2023

(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
Mr. Kuldeep Singh Kanwar vs. Mr. Manoj
Sharma and Ors.

RSA No.355 of 2022

05.12.2023 Present: Mr. Sunil Awasthi, Advocate, for the

appellant.

None for the respondent No.1.

CMP No.17844 of 2023

r Learned counsel for the applicant/appellant

seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the instant

application with liberty reserved to file afresh at an appropriate

stage.

Hence, in view of the above, the instant

application is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid.

( Sushil
Kukreja )

Judge

5th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
The Principal Secretary (PW) to the Govt.
of H.P. vs. R.P. Dhiman

OMP(M) No.52 of 2023

05.12.2023 Present: Ms. Ranjana Patiyal, Deputy Advocate
General, for the applicant/objector.

Mr. Suneet Goel, Advocate, for the
respondent.

OMP(M) No.52 of 2023

rHeard. Having regard to the averments

made in the application, which are duly supported with an

affidavit of the Er. Ajay Sharma, the same is allowed and

delay of one day in filing the Objection Petition is hereby

condoned.

Application stands disposed of.

Arbitration Case No._________of 2023

Be registered.

Notice. Mr. Suneet Goel, learned counsel,

appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the

respondent. He prays for and is granted three weeks’

time to file reply. List thereafter.

OMP No.________of 2023

Be registered.

Notice in the aforesaid terms.

Reply, if any, as prayed, be filed within three

weeks. List alongwith main petition.

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS

( Sushil
Kukreja )

                                         Judge





    5th December, 2023
         (reena)





              r          to









                           ::: Downloaded on - 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
                         NHAI vs. Anek Ram




                                                               .
                                            OMP(M) No.71 of 2023

05.12.2023 Present: Mr. Sumeet Raj Sharma, Advocate, for the
applicant-appellant.

Mr. Amit Singh Chandel, Advocate, for the
respondent.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

respondent prays for and is granted two weeks’ time to

move an appropriate application to set-aside ex parte

order dated 07.10.2023.

As prayed, list after two weeks.

( Sushil
Kukreja )

Judge

5th December, 2023

(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Rajni
Bala & Ors.

CMP No.14490 of 2023

04.12.2023 Present: Mr. Lalit Kumar Sharma, Advocate, for the

non-applicant/appellant.

Mr. Karan Singh Kanwar, Advocate, for the
applicants/respondents.



                         Learned
                                   to    counsel               for

applicants/respondents prays for and is granted one
r the

week’s further time to place on record the documents in

terms of order dated 17.10.2023. List thereafter.

( Sushil

Kukreja )
Judge

4th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Asha Devi
and others

CMP Nos.12193 & 12189 of 2023 in FAO
No.37of 2005.

04.12.2023 Present: Mr. Sambhav Bhasin, Advocate, for the non-

applicant/appellant.

Mr. Lakshay Thakur, Advocate, for
applicant/respondent No.2.

r to
CMP No.12193 of 2023

The present application under Order 32 Rule 12

read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, has

been maintained by applicant/respondent No.2, Nahul alias

Rohit Kumar, for discharging his natural guardian.

2. No reply to the application is intended to be filed

on behalf of the non-applicant/appellant.

3. Heard. Since the applicant/respondent No.2,

Nahul alias Rohit Kumar, has attained the age of majority, as

is evident from the Matriculation certificate annexed with the

application as Annexure A-3, the application is allowed and his

natural guardian, i.e. his mother, respondent No.1, Asha Devi,

is discharged and he is allowed to pursue the case in his own

capacity.

The application stands disposed of.

CMP No.12189 of 2023

4. The present application under Section 151 of the

Code of Civil Procedure, has been maintained by

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
applicant/respondent No.2, Nahul alias Rohit Kumar, for

release of entire compensation amount, lying deposited in the

Registry of this Court.

5. It has been mentioned in the application that

applicant/respondent No.2, Nahul alias Rohit Kumar, has now

attained the age of majority and is in dire need of money to do

the higher studies,

as such, the entire

compensation falling in his share, be released to him.

Having regard to the averments made in the
amount of

application, which is duly supported with an affidavit of the

applicant as well as taking into consideration the fact that the

matter has been finally decided by this Court vide judgment

dated 01.01.2009 and since no appeal whatsoever has been

filed by either of the parties in the superior court of law against

the aforesaid judgment, the same has attained finality, as

such, the present application is allowed and the entire amount

of compensation falling in the share of applicant/respondent

No.2, Nahul alias Rohit Kumar alongwith up-to-date interest,

which is lying deposited in the registry of this Court, is ordered

to be released in his favour, by remitting the same in his

saving bank account, after due verification, detail whereof has

been given in Para-2 of the application.

The application stands disposed of.

( Sushil Kukreja )

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
Judge

    4th December, 2023





         (reena)





              r          to









                          ::: Downloaded on - 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS

Mohan Lal and another vs. Nitin and
another

CMP(M) No.562 of 2023

04.12.2023 Present: Mr. Dalip K. Sharma, Advocate, for the

applicants/appellants.

Mr. Atul Jhingan, Advocate, for respondent
No.1.

Mr. Rajender Singh Thakur, Advocate, for
respondent No.2.

CMP No.17645 of 2023

No reply is intended to be filed in the instant

application.

Heard. Having regard to the averments

made in the application, which are duly supported with an

affidavit of the applicant/respondent No.2, the same is

allowed and aforesaid applicant/respondent No.2, is

permitted to join the proceedings.

Application stands disposed of.

CMP(M) No.562 of 2023

Heard. Having regard to the averments

made in the application, which are duly supported with an

affidavit of the applicant/appellant Mohan Lal, the same is

allowed and delay of 45 days in filing the appeal is hereby

condoned.

Application stands disposed of.

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS

RSA No._______of 2023

Be registered.

Notice. Mr. Atul Jhingan and Mr. Rajender

Singh Thakur, learned counsel, appear and waive service

of notice on behalf of respondent No.1 and respondent

No.2, respectively.

r Learned counsel for the appellants is directed

to supply the copy of grounds of appeal to the

respondents within two weeks. List thereafter.

CMP No._________2023

Be registered.

Notice in the aforesaid terms.

Reply, if any, be filed within two weeks. List

thereafter.

( Sushil Kukreja
)
Judge

4th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
Vidhata Negi vs. Sithar Mati

CMP(M) No.1026 of

2023

04.12.2023 Present: Mr. Amit Kumar Dhumal, Advocate, for the

applicant/appellant.

Mr. K.D. Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr.
Vivek Thakur, Advocate, for the respondent.

Learned counsel for the applicant/appellant

prays for and is granted three weeks’ time to deposit 50%

of the decretal amount alongwith up-to-date interest. List

thereafter.

( Sushil

Kukreja )
Judge

4th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
Kuldeep Singh vs. Gouri Dutt

Cr.MP(M) No.1424 of

2023

04.12.2023 Present: Mr. Gobind Korla, Advocate, for the

applicant/appellant.

Mr. Loveneesh Singh Thakur, Advocate, for
the respondent.

Cr.MP(M) No.1424 of 2023

Heard. Having regard to the averments

made in the application, which are duly supported with an

affidavit of the applicant, the same is allowed and delay of

35 days in filing the appeal is hereby condoned.

Application stands disposed of.

Cr.Appeal No._______of 2023

Be registered.

Notice. Mr. Loveneesh Singh Thakur,

appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the

respondent.

Learned counsel for the appellant is directed

to supply the copy of grounds of appeal to the respondent

within two weeks. List thereafter.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

4th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
Surinder Kumar vs. Duni Chand and
others

CMP(M) No.1634 of
2023

04.12.2023 Present: Mr. Devender K. Sharma Advocate, for the
applicant/appellant.

Issue notice to the respondents, returnable

within six weeks, on taking steps within a period of five

days. List thereafter.

( Sushil
Kukreja )

Judge

4th December, 2023

(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
Balwinder Singh vs. State of H.P.

Cr.MP(M) No.1733 of

2023

04.12.2023 Present: Mr. Suneet Verma, Advocate vice Mr. Umesh

Kanwar, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate
General, for the respondent/State.

HC Karan Singh, P.S. Nurpur, District Kangra,
rH.P., present with record.

Fresh status report stands filed.

Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of

the petitioner prays for adjournment on the ground that

arguing counsel is not available.

As prayed, list on 26.12.2023.

( Sushil

Kukreja )
Judge

4th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
Dheeraj Kumar vs. State of H.P.

Cr.MP(M) No.2893 of

2023

04.12.2023 Present: Mr. Ankit Dhiman, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate
General, for the respondent/State.

ASI Sanjeev Chandel, I.O., P.S. Sadar, Una,
District Una, H.P., present with record.

Fresh status report stands filed.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

petitioner prays for adjournment to go through the same.

As prayed, list on 19.12.2023, on which date,

petitioner is directed to remain present in the Court.

( Sushil
Kukreja )

Judge

4th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
Raghubir Singh vs. Dinesh Kumar & Anr.

Cr.MP No.4486 of 2023 in Cr. Revision

No.10 of 2023

04.12.2023 Present: Mr. Naveen K. Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the

applicant.

Ms. Vandana Kumari, Advocate vice Mr.
Sanjay Jaswal, Advocate, for respondent

No.1.

Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate
General, for respondent No.2/State.

Cr.MP No.4486 of 2023

Heard. Having regard to the averments

made in the application, which are duly supported with an

affidavit of the applicant, the same is allowed and three

weeks’ further time is granted to comply with the order

dated 13.10.2023.

Application stands disposed of.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

4th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Rajni
Bala & Ors.

CMP No.14484 of 2023

04.12.2023 Present: Mr. Lalit Kumar Sharma, Advocate, for the

non-applicant/appellant.

Mr. Karan Singh Kanwar, Advocate, for the
applicants/respondents.



                         Learned
                                   to    counsel               for

applicants/respondents prays for and is granted one
r the

week’s further time to place on record the documents in

terms of order dated 17.10.2023. List thereafter.

( Sushil

Kukreja )
Judge

4th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
Chaman Lal vs. State of H.P.

Cr.MPM No.3021 of

2023

04.12.2023 Present: Mr. Hem Raj, Advocate Vice Mr.Bhupinder

Singh Ahuja, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Raj Negi, Additional Advocate General,
for the respondent/State.

Notice.

Mr. Raj Negi, learned Additional

Advocate General appears and waives service of notice

on behalf of the respondent/State. He prays for and is

granted two weeks’ time to file status report.

List on 19.12.2023.

( Sushil
Kukreja )

Judge

4th December, 2023

(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
Manoj Kumar Sharma vs. Golf Link
Finance &

Resorts Pvt. Ltd.

Cr. Revision No.518 of 2023

04.12.2023 Present: Mr. Mohar Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Ms.Seema K. Guleria, Advocate, for the
respondent.

Cr.MP No.4378 of 2023

No reply is intended to be filed in the instant

application.

Heard. Having regard to the averments

made in the application, which are duly supported with an

affidavit of the applicant/petitioner, the same is allowed

and three weeks’ further time is granted to comply with

the order dated 22.09.2023. However, it is made clear

that if the aforesaid order dated 22.09.2023, is not

complied during the aforesaid period, then interim order

shall stand vacated without any further reference to this

Court.

Application stands disposed of.

Cr. Revision No.518 of 2023

Learned counsel for the respondent prays for

and is granted three weeks’ further time to file Power of

Attorney on behalf of the respondent. List thereafter.

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS

( Sushil
Kukreja )

                                         Judge





    4th December, 2023
         (reena)





              r          to









                           ::: Downloaded on - 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS

Jeevan Prakash vs. Amit Kalia

RSA No.312 of

2019

04.12.2023 Present: Mr. Sunny Modgil, Advocate, for the

appellant.

Mr. Karan Sharma, Advocate, for the
respondent.

r to
Learned counsel for the respondent prays for

and is granted four weeks’ further time to deposit the

remaining amount in terms of the order dated 12.09.2023.

List thereafter.

( Sushil
Kukreja )

Judge

4th December, 2023

(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
Dhian Chand vs. Amin Chand

RSA No.525 of

2019

04.12.2023 Present: Ms. Pooja Verma, Advocate vice Mr. Naresh

Sharma, Advocate, for the appellants.

Mr. Pranjal Munjal, Advocate, for respondents
No.1 to 3.

r to
CMP No.16586 of 2022

As jointly prayed, list for consideration after

four weeks.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

4th December, 2023

(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
Rajesh Kumar Misra vs. Mansi Sahay
Thakur and another.

RSA No.173 of
2022

04.12.2023 Present: Mr. Hem Raj, Advocate Vice Mr.Bhupinder
Singh Ahuja, Advocate, for the appellant.

Mr. Prashant Sharma, Advocate, for

respondent No.1.

Mr. R.K. Bawa, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ajay
Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.2.

Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of

the appellant prays for adjournment on the ground that

arguing counsel is not available.

As prayed, list after four weeks.

( Sushil

Kukreja )
Judge

4th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
Manohar Lal & others vs. Durga Prasad &
others

RSA No.335 of
2022

04.12.2023 Present: Mr. Devender K. Sharma, Advocate, for the
appellant.

Ms. Anita, Advocate vice Ms. Vidhushi

Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.1,8 &
9.

Remaining respondents already ex parte.

RSA No.335 of 2022 & CMP No.16345 of
2022

Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of

respondents No1,8 & 9, prays for adjournment on the

ground that she has to inspect the record.

As prayed, list after four weeks.

In the meantime, interim order to continue till

the next date of hearing.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

4th December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
Ram Rattan vs. Ashwani Kumar & Anr.

RSA No.139 of

2021

01.12.2023 Present: Ms. Manjula, Advocate vice Mr. Aditya

Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.

Mr. Nitin Thakur, Advocate, for the
respondent.

r to
Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of

the appellant prays for adjournment on the ground that

arguing counsel is not available due to his ailment.

As prayed, list after one week.

( Sushil

Kukreja )
Judge

1st December, 2023

(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
Ram Rattan vs. Ashwani Kumar & Anr.

RSA No.139 of

2021

01.12.2023 Present: Ms. Manjula, Advocate vice Mr. Aditya

Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.

Mr. Nitin Thakur, Advocate, for the
respondent.

r to
Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of

the appellant prays for adjournment on the ground that

arguing counsel is not available due to his ailment.

As prayed, list after one week.

( Sushil

Kukreja )
Judge

1st December, 2023

(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
Kala Devi and others vs. Lehnu and others

RSA No.391 of

2022

01.12.2023 Present: Mr. R.K. Gautam, Senior Advocate with Mr.

Sahil Dixit, Advocate, for the appellants.

Mr. Gaurav Bhardwaj, Advocate, for
respondents No.1 & 2.

Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans,Advocate, for
rrespondents No.3 & 4.

CMP Nos.18135 & 18136 of 2022.

Learned counsel for non-

applicants/respondents No.1 & 2, prays for adjournment

on the ground that arguing counsel is not available.

As prayed, list after two weeks.

( Sushil
Kukreja )

Judge

1st December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
Urmila Devi and others. vs. Ved Parkash

RSA No.71 of

2023

01.12.2023 Present: Ms. Shrutika, Advocate vice Mr. Dheeraj K

Vashisht, Advocate, for the appellants.

Mr. Y.P. Sood and Mr. Parveen Chauhan,
Advocates, for respondents No.1 to 5.

CMP No.2884 of 2023

Learned counsel for the respondents prays

for and is granted two weeks’ time to file reply. List

thereafter.

In the meantime, interim order to continue till

the next date of hearing.

RSA No.71 of 2023

As prayed, list after two weeks.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

1st December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
Parkash Chand vs. DFO-cum-Collector
and others.

RSA No.106 of
2022

01.12.2023 Present: Mr. Sanjay Jaswal, Advocate, for the
appellant.

Ms. Ranjana Patial, Deputy Advocate

General, for respondents No.1 to 3/State.

Ms. Kavita Kajal, Advocate vice Mr. Atharv
Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.4.

RSA No.106 of 2022 & CMP No.5875 of

2022

Learned counsel for the appellant prays for

adjournment on the ground that he has to inspect the

record.

As prayed, list after four weeks.

In the meantime, interim order to continue till

further orders.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

1st December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
Ram Lok vs. Babu Ram and others.

RSA No.164 of

2023

01.12.2023 Present: Mr. J.P. Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.

Mr. Ajinder Mehta, Advocate, for respondent
No.1.

Respondents No.2 to 4 are ex parte.

Heard. Admit on the substantial questions of

law No.1 & 3, formulated at Page No.13 of the paper

book.

Notice. Mr. Ajinder Mehta, learned counsel,

appears and waives service of post admission notice on

behalf of respondent No.1.

Let post admission notice be issued to

respondents No.2 to 6, returnable within six weeks, on

taking steps within five days. List thereafter.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

1st December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
Jodha Ram (deceased) through LR Mast
Ram vs. State of H.P & Ors.

RSA No.206 of
2023

01.12.2023 Present: Mr. H.S. Rangra, Advocate, for the appellant.

Ms. Ranjana Patial, Deputy Advocate
General, for respondents No.1,3/State.

Mr. Devender K. Sharma, Advocate, for
respondents No.4 to 9.

Name of respondent No.2, is ordered to be

deleted.

Learned counsel for the appellant prays for

adjournment.

As prayed, list after four weeks.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

1st December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
H.P. Bus Stands Management & Development
Authority vs. M/s Prashanti Surya Construction

Company.

Arbitration Appeal No.34 of 2023

01.12.2023 Present: Mr. Mohit Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.

Mr. Sunil Mohan Goel, Advocate, for the
caveator/respondent No.1.

Ms. Ranjana Patial, Deputy Advocate
General, for respondent No.2/State.

Caveat Petition No.518 of 2023

Discharged.

Arbitration Appeal No.34/2023

Mr. Sunil Mohan Goel, learned counsel and

Ms.Ranjana Patial, learned Deputy Advocate General

appear and waive service of notice on behalf of

respondent No.1 and respondent No.2, respectively.

List on 05.12.2023.

OMP No.586/2023

Notice in the aforesaid terms.

Reply, as prayed for, be filed within one

week. List thereafter with main appeal.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

1st December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Nirmala
Devi & Ors.

CMP No.10138 of 2023 in FAO No.185 of
2007.

01.12.2023 Present: None for the non-applicant/appellant.

Mr. Dewa Nand Sharma, Advocate, for
applicant/respondent No.2.

Non for non-applicants/respondents No.1 &
3.

CMP No.10138 of 2023

The present application under Section 151 of

the Code of Civil Procedure, has been maintained by

applicant/respondent No.2, Sudhanshu alias Shishu, for

release of entire compensation amount, lying deposited in

the Registry of this Court.

2. It has been mentioned in the application that

applicant/respondent No.2, Sudhanshu alias Shishu, has

attained the age of majority on 15.03.2022 and is in dire

need of money to do the higher studies and also to meet

out his day to day expenses, as such, the entire amount

of compensation falling in his share, be released to him.

It has also been submitted in the application that the

matter has been finally decided by this Court and no

further appeal has been filed by the non-

applicant/appellant.

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS

3. Having regard to the averments made in the

application, which is duly supported with an affidavit of the

applicant as well as taking into consideration the fact that

the award has attained finality, as no appeal whatsoever

has been filed against the judgment dated 28.03.2016,

passed by this Court in FAO(WCA) No.185 of 2007, which

was partly allowed against the impugned order dated

09.04.2007, passed by learned Commissioner under the

Workman’s Compensation Act, Theog, Shimla, the

present application is allowed and the entire amount of

compensation falling in the share of applicant/respondent

No.2, Sudhanshu alias Shishu including the share

accrued to him on account of death of his grand-father,

late Sh. Gita Ram alongwith up-to-date interest, which is

lying deposited in the registry of this Court, is ordered to

be released in his favour, by remitting the same in his

saving bank account, after due verification, detail whereof

has been given in the copy of bank pass book, annexed

with the application as Annexure A-3.

The application stands disposed of.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
1st December, 2023
(reena)

r to

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
Joti Ram (deceased) though his LRs vs.
Jog Dhian

RSA No.573 of
2006

01.12.2023 Present: Mr. Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Senior Advocate with
Mr. Sanjay Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the
appellants.

Mr. Sunil Mohan Goel, Advocate, for the
respondent.

Learned counsel for the respondent prays for

adjournment.

As prayed, list next week.

( Sushil

Kukreja )
Judge

1st December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
HPSEB & Ors. vs. Rakesh

RSA No.392 of

2007

01.12.2023 Present: Ms. Sunita Sharma, Senior Advocate with

Ms. Lalita Sharma, Advocate, for the
appellants.

Mr. Vinod Kumar Gupta, Advocate, for the

respondent.

Learned counsel for the appellants prays for

an adjournment on the ground that she has recently been

engaged in the instant case and has not gone through the

case file.

As prayed, list after two weeks.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

1st December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
Smt. Ram Pyari vs. Amar Singh and
others

RSA No.114 of
2007

01.12.2023 Present: Ms. Sunita Sharma, Senior Advocate with
Ms. Lalita Sharma, Advocate, for the
appellant.

Mr. Pawan Gautam, Advocate, for
respondents No.1 to 6.

None for respondents No.7 to 12.

Learned counsel for respondents No.1 to 6,

prays for adjournment on the ground that arguing counsel

is pre-occupied in another Court.

As prayed, list on 27.12.2023.

( Sushil
Kukreja )

Judge

1st December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
Rikhi Ram vs. State of H.P.

RSA No.523 of

2008

01.12.2023 Present: Mr. K.D. Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr.

Rahul Gathania, Advocate, for the appellant.

Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate
General, for the respondent.

Learned counsel for the appellant submits

that in terms of the order dated 23 rd September, 2019, the

representation has been filed by the appellant, but the

concerned authority has not passed any order upon the

same.

Learned Additional Advocate General prays

for two weeks’ time to seek further instructions in the

matter.

As prayed, list after two weeks.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

1st December, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
Sh. Ramesh Chand through his LR. vs. Sh. Jagdish
Chand and another

RSA No.147 of
2021

30.11.2023 Present: Mr. Jeevan Kumar, Advocate, for the
appellant.

Mr. Amit Sharma, Advocate, for respondents

No.1(a)(i) to 1(a)(iii)

Respondent No.2 already ex pate.

CMP No.17714 of 2023

No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of

the non-applicants/respondents

Heard. Having regard to the averments

made in the application, which is duly supported with an

affidavit of the applicant/appellant, the same is allowed

and six weeks further time is granted to him to deposit the

balance decretal amount.

Application stands disposed of.

RSA No.147 of 2021

As prayed, list after six weeks.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

30th November, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
Bimla Kumari & ors. vs. Ved Parkash &
ors.

RSA No.349 of
2008

30.11.2023 Present: Mr. Prantap, Advocate vice Mr. Subhash
Sharma, Advocate, for the appellants.

Ms. Sneh Bhimta, Advocate vice Mr.

Dushyant Dadwal, Advocate, for respondent
No.1(a) to 1(c).

None for respondents No.2 & 3.

Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of

the appellants, prays for an adjournment on the ground

that arguing counsel is not available.

As prayed, list after four weeks.

( Sushil
Kukreja )

Judge

30th November, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
Rashmi Gupta vs. Navneet Gupta

FAO No.436 of

2009

30.11.2023 Present: Mr. Anil Kapoor, Advocate vice Mr. Nimish

Gupta, Advocate, for the appellant.

Mr. Kashitiz, Advocate vice Mr.Vinod Kumar
Gupta, Advocate, for the respondent.

Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of

the appellant, prays for an adjournment on the ground

that arguing counsel is not available.

As prayed, list after four weeks.

( Sushil

Kukreja )
Judge

30th November, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
NIC vs. Om Parkash & Anr.

FAO No.546 of

2009

30.11.2023 Present: Mr. Suneet Goel, Advocate, for the appellant.

Ms. Kusum Chaudhary, Advocate, for
respondent No.1.

Mr. Bimal Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr.
Varun Thakur, Advocate, for respondent
rNo.2.

Arguments heard. Judgment reserved.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

30th November, 2023

(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
NIC vs. Kalawati & ors.

FAO No.439 of

2012

30.11.2023 Present: Mr. Suneet Goel, Advocate, for the appellant.

Mr.Y.Paul, Advocate, for respondents No.1 &
2.

Mr. Bimal Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr.

Varun Thakur, Advocate, for respondent
No.3.

Ms. Kusum Chaudhary, Advocate, for

respondent No.4.

Arguments heard. Judgment reserved.

( Sushil
Kukreja )

Judge

30th November, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
Lalit Rana vs. State of H.P.

Cr.Appeal No.121 of

2010

30.11.2023 Present: Mr. Bimal Gupta, Senior Advocate with Ms.

Kusum Chaudhary, Advocate, for the
appellant.

Mr. Raj Negi, Additional Advocate General,

for the respondent.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

appellant prays for an adjournment on the ground that

arguing counsel is preoccupied in another Court.

As prayed, list after four weeks.

( Sushil
Kukreja )

Judge

30th November, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
The United India Insurance Group
Company vs. Sunil Kumar and Ors.

FAO No.16 of
2012

30.11.2023 Present: Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate Vice Mr. J.S.
Bagga, Advocate, for the appellant.

Mr. Aman Thakur, Advocate Vice Mr. Mohit

Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.1.

Mr. Adarsh K. Vashishta, Advocate, for
respondents No.2 & 3.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

appellant prays for an adjournment on the ground that

arguing counsel is preoccupied in another Court.

As prayed, list after four weeks.

( Sushil
Kukreja )

Judge

30th November, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
Suresh Kumar vs. Fulma Devi

Cr. Appeal No.346 of 2022

24.11.2023 Present: Mr. Jagat Paul, Advocate, for the appellant.

None for the respondent.

Cr.MP No.3007/2023

As per report of the Registry bailable

warrants issued against the respondent received back

duly executed, however, none has appeared on behalf of

the respondent in the pre-lunch session and even in the

post-lunch session.

Since, the appeal already stands admitted,

list the present application along with main appeal for final

hearing in due course.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
District Collector Mandi vs. Ved Vatti &
Anr.

RFA No.4106 of
2013

24.11.2023 Present: Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate
General, for the appellant.

Mr. Devender K. Sharma, Advocate, for

respondent No.1.

Mr. Manish Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. Vikas
Rathore, Advocate, for respondent No.2.

Learned Additional Advocate General prays

for an adjournment. Prayer allowed, as not opposed.

As prayed, list after two weeks.

( Sushil
Kukreja )

Judge

24th November, 2023

(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
The Kinnaur District Co-operative
Marketing and Consumer Federation Ltd.

vs. Promila Thakur and another.

FAO No.243 of
2015

24.11.2023 Present: Mr. Munish Kumar, Advocate vice Mr. Jagdish
Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.

Mr. Bhupender Sharma, Advocate, for
respondent No.2.

Heard in part.

At the request of learned vice counsel

appearing on behalf of the appellant, list for further

arguments on 28.11.2023.

( Sushil

Kukreja )
Judge

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd. vs.
Nikki Devi and ors. a/w connected matter.

FAO(MVA) No.593 of 2016 a/w FAO(MVA)
No.334 of 2018

24.11.2023 Present: Mr. Munish Kumar, Advocate vice Mr. Jagdish
Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant(s).

Mr. Sanjeev Kuthiala, Senior Advocate with

Ms. Ankita, Advocate, for the appellants in
FAO (MVA) No.334 of 2018 and for
respondents No.1 to 3 I FAO (MVA) No.593
of 2016.

Mr. Amrinder Singh Rana, Advocate, for the

respondents in the respective appeals.

At the joint request of learned counsel

representing the parties, list after two weeks.

( Sushil

Kukreja )
Judge

24th November, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
Sanjay Gupta & Ors. vs. Arya Smaj &
others

RSA No.264 of
2023

24.11.2023 Present: Mr. Arun Kaushal and Mr. Rajesh Kashyap,
Advocates, for the appellants.

RSA No.264 of 2023

Issue notice to the respondents, returnable

within six weeks, on taking steps within a period of one

week. List thereafter.

CMP No.17403 of 2023

Notice in the aforesaid terms.

In the meantime, execution of impugned

judgment and decree dated 17.07.2023, passed by

learned District Judge, Kangra at Dharamshala, District

Kangra in Civil Appeal No.02-D/XIII/2019, shall remain

stayed, till the next date of hearing

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

24th November, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
State of H.P. through Principal Secretary,
I&PH & Anr. vs. M/s S.B. Trading Company

Arbitration Case No.765 of
2023

24.11.2023 Present: Mr. Raj Negi, Additional Advocate General,
for the objectors/petitioners.

Mr. Sumeet Raj Sharma, Advocate, for the

respondent.

OMP No.483 of 2023

Learned counsel for the respondent, prays for

and is granted two weeks’ time to file reply. List

thereafter.

( Sushil

Kukreja )
Judge

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
Sneh Lata & Ors. vs. Subhash Chand &
Ors.

FAO No.128/2012

24.11.2023 Present: Mr. Vivek Singh Thakur, Advocate, for the

appellants.

Ms. Shivani Tagta, Advocate Vice Ms. Anjali
Soni Verma, Advocate, for respondents No.1

& 2.

Mr. Abhishek Verma, Advocate Vice Mr.
Praneet Gupta, Advocate, for respondent
No.3.

Name of respondent No.4, is deleted vide
order dated 25.07.2023.

CMP No.16612/2023

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

applicants/appellants prays for and is granted two weeks’

time to file some additional documents qua the age of

minor applicants/appellants. List thereafter.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

24th November, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. vs.
Joyti and others.

FAO No.88/2014

24.11.2023 Present: Mr. Lalit K. Sharma, Advocate, for the

appellants.

Mr. Mohar Singh, Advocate Vice Mr. Nimish
Gupta, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 3.

Mr. Parveen Chauhan, Advocate, for
respondent No.4.

Mr. Yogesh Kumar Chandel, Advocate, for

respondent No.5.

CMP No.16616 of 2023

No reply to the application is intended to be

filed on behalf of the non-applicant/appellant.

Heard. Since the applicant/respondent No.3,

Pooja, has attained the age of majority, as is evident from

the Matriculation certificate annexed with the application

as Annexure A-1, the application is allowed and her

natural guardian, i.e. her mother, respondent No.1, Jyoti

Devi, is discharged and she is allowed to be sued in her

own capacity.

The application stands disposed of.

CMP No.16617 of 2023

The present application under Section 151 of

the Code of Civil Procedure, has been maintained by

applicant/respondent No.3, Pooja Kumari, for release of

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
award amount, lying deposited in the Registry of this

Court.

It has been mentioned in the application that

now respondent No.3, has attained the age of majority

and getting married in the month of December; and is

also in dire need of money.

r Having regard to the averments made in the

application, which is duly supported with an affidavit of the

applicant, the present application is allowed and the

award amount alongwith up-to-date interest, which is lying

deposited in the registry of this Court, is ordered to be

released in favour of applicant/respondent No.3, Pooja

Kumari, as per her share, by remitting the same in her

saving bank account, after due verification, detail whereof

has been given in Para-6 of the application, subject to all

just exceptions.

The application stands disposed of.

FAO No.88/2014

Learned counsel for the appellant prays for

and is granted two weeks’ time to file amended memo of

parties. List thereafter.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
24th November, 2023
(reena)

r to

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
Ghanshyam & others vs. M/s KTC &
another

FAO No.55/2015

24.11.2023 Present: Mr. Madan Gopal, Advocate vice Mr. Naveen

K. Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the appellants.

Mr. Suneet Goel, Advocate, for respondent
No.1.

Mr. Ravi Kumar, Advocate Vice Mr. Maan
Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.2.

Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocate Vice Mr.

Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for respondent

No.3.

CMP Nos.17042/2023 & 17046/2023

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

non-applicants/appellants prays for an adjournment.

As prayed, list after three weeks.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
ICCI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd.
vs. Chakni Devi & Ors.

FAO No.239/2015

24.11.2023 Present: Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocate Vice Mr.

Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.

Mr. Abhyendra Gupta, Advocate, for
respondents No.1 & 2.

Mr. Mohar Singh, Advocate Vice Mr. Nimish
r Gupta, Advocate, for respondent No.3.

CMP Nos.17196/2023 & 17198/2023

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

non-applicant/appellant prays for and is granted three

weeks’ time to file reply. List thereafter.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

24th November, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
Pushpa Saini and Ors. vs.Chanda Devi

RSA No.02 of

2022

24.11.2023 Present: Mr. Rupinder Singh Thakur, Advocate, for the

appellants.

Mr. Bhupender Gupta, Senior Advocate with
Mr. Pranjal Munjal, Advocate, for the

respondent.

In order to explore the possibility of amicable

settlement, with the consent of learned counsel for the

parties, the matter is referred to mediation and Mr. G.D.

Verma, learned Senior Advocate is appointed as Mediator

to mediate between the parties. Parties are directed to

appear before the learned Mediator on 05.12.2023 at 1:00

PM, in the main Mediation Center, H.P. High Court, who is

requested to submit his report within a period of four

weeks. List thereafter.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

24th November, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
Sher Singh vs. Ganga Ram & Ors.

RSA No.154 of

2023

24.11.2023 Present: Mr. Narender Kumar Reddy, Advocate, for

the appellants.

Mr. K.D. Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr.Het
Ram Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.1.

Mr. Rahul Gathania, Advocate, for
rrespondents No.2 to 6.

Learned counsel for the appellants, prays for

an adjournment.

As prayed, list after four weeks.

( Sushil
Kukreja )

Judge

24th November, 2023

(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
Kamal Kishore and others vs. Simro Devi
and others

RSA No.70 of
2022

23.11.2023 Present: Mr. Atul Thakur, Advocate Vice Mr. Ajeet
Singh Saklani, Advocate, for the appellants.

Mr. Ajay Chandel, Advocate, for respondent

No.1.

Respondents No.2 to 7 are ex parte vide
order dated 31.05.2022.

Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of

the appellants, prays for an adjournment on the ground that

arguing counsel is not available.

As prayed, list after two weeks.

( Sushil
Kukreja )

Judge

23rd November, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
Rajesh Kumar vs. Karan Singh and Ors.

RSA No.383 of

2022

23.11.2023 Present: Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocate, for the

appellant.

Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Advocate Vice Mr.
Virender Thakur, Advocate, for respondents

No.1 to 3.

Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate
General, for respondent No.4.

RSA No.383/2022 & CMP No.17866/2022

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of

respondents No.1 to 3, submits at bar that respondent

No.3, Sudarshan Singh, has expired on 23.10.2023.

Learned counsel for the appellant prays for

an adjournment to take consequential steps on account of

death of aforesaid respondent No.3.

As prayed, list after four weeks.

In the meantime, interim order to continue.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

23rd November, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
Brij Nandan vs. Ashwani Kumar

RSA No.115 of

2023

23.11.2023 Present: Mr. Mohinder Singh Kanwar, Advocate, for

the appellants.

Mr. G.R. Palsra, Advocate, for respondent
No.1.

Mr. Goldy Kumar, Advocate vice Mr. Narinder
Guleria, Advocate, for respondent No.2.

None for respondents No.3 to 11.

CMP No.6522 of 2023

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of

respondent No.2, prays for and is granted two weeks’ time

to file reply. Rejoinder, if any, thereto, be filed within two

weeks thereafter.

As prayed for, list on 27.12.2023.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

23rd November, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
Sesh Ram vs. Tape Ram

RSA No.216 of

2023

23.11.2023 Present: Mr. H.S. Rangra, Advocate, for the

appellants.

Mr. Ajay Dhiman, Advocate, for respondent
No.1.

Mr. G.R. Palsra, Advocate, for respondents
No.2 & 3.

Heard. Admitted on the substantial questions

of law No.1, 3 & 4, formulated at Page No.8 of the paper

book.

Notice. Mr. Ajay Dhiman and Mr. G.R. Palsra,

learned counsel, appear and waive service of post

admission notice on behalf of respondent No.1 and

respondents No.2 & 3, respectively.

List for final hearing in due course.

In the meantime, records of the Courts below

be also called for.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

23rd November, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
Kartar Singh & Ors. vs. Rattan Lal & Ors.

RSA No.262 of

2023

23.11.2023 Present: Mr. Sanjeev Kuthiala, Senior Advocate with

Ms.Amita Chandel, Advocate, for the
appellants.

RSA No.262 of 2023

Heard. Admitted on the substantial questions

of law No.2 to 5, formulated at Page Nos.13 & 14 of the

paper book.

Let post admission notice be issued to the

respondents, returnable within six weeks, on taking steps

within a period of one week.

In the meantime, record of the Courts below

be also called for.

CMP No.17270 of 2023

Notice in the aforesaid terms.

List after six weeks.

In the meantime, parties are directed to

maintain status quo qua nature and possession of the suit

land till the next date of hearing.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
23rd November, 2023

           (reena)






             r        to









                           ::: Downloaded on - 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
                         Narender Singh & Ors. vs.                  National

Highways Authority of India.

Arbitration Appeal No.13 of 2022

23.11.2023 Present: Mr. Varun Rana, Advocate, for the appellants

in all the appeals.

Ms. Shreya Chauhan, Advocate, for the
respondent in all the appeals.

r to
Arguments heard. Judgment reserved.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

23rd November, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
Vijay Kumar vs. General Manager Kangra Cooperative
Bank & Ors.

RSA No.81 of
2019

23.11.2023 Present: Mr. Anuj Nag, Advocate, for the appellants.

Mr. Tarun K. Sharma, Advocate, for
respondents N.1 to 3.

Ms. Archana Negi, Advocate Vice Mr.
Ashwani Dhiman, Advocate, for respondents
No.4 & 5.

Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of

respondents No.4 & 5, prays for an adjournment on the

ground that arguing counsel is not available.

As prayed, list after two weeks.

( Sushil
Kukreja )

Judge

23rd November, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
Raj Kumar vs. The Kangra Central Cooperative Bank

RSA No.118 of

2020

23.11.2023 Present: Mr. Yash Pal, Advocate Vice Mr. Gobind

Korla, Advocate, for the appellant.

Mr. Rakesh Thakur, Advocate, for the
respondent.

Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of

the appellant prays for an adjournment on the ground that

arguing counsel is not available.

As prayed, list after three weeks.

( Sushil

Kukreja )
Judge

23rd November, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
Krishan Chand & Ors. vs. Sunder Lal &
Ors.

RSA No.223 of
2021

23.11.2023 Present: Mr. Sanjeev Kuthiala, Senior Advocate with
Ms.Amita Chandel, Advocate, for the
appellants.

Mr. G.R. Palsra, Advocate, for the
respondents.

RSA No.223 of 2021

Heard. Admitted on the substantial questions

of law No.1 to 3, 5 & 6 formulated at Page Nos.14,15 & 16

of the paper book. List for final hearing in due course.

CMP No.15277 of 2021

Heard. Interim order dated 30.03.2022, is

made absolute during the pendency of the appeal.

Application stands disposed of.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

23rd November, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
Surinder Kumar vs. Bimlesh Sharma &
Ors.

RSA No.115 of 2022

23.11.2023 Present: Mr. Naveen Awasthi, Advocate, for the

appellant.

Mr. Anu Tuli Azta, Advocate, for respondent
No.1.

Respondent No.2, is ex parte vide order
dated 30.06.2022

None for respondent No.3, though served for

25.07.2023.

Learned counsel for the appellant prays for

an adjournment on the ground that he has to inspect the

record.

As prayed, list after three weeks.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

23rd November, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
Anil Kumar vs. State of H.P.

Cr.MPM No.2646 of

2023

13.10.2023 Present: Mr. Vivek Singh Attri & Mr. Ankit Kaloti,

Advocates, for the petitioner.

Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General,
for the respondent/State.

r to
Notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional

Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice

on behalf of the respondent /State. He prays for and is

granted three weeks’ time to file status report.

Heard. In the interim, it is ordered that petitioner

shall be released on bail, in the event of his arrest in case

FIR No.133/2023, dated 09.10.2023, under Sections 324,

341, 147, 148 and 149 of Indian Penal Code, registered at

Police Station Gagret, District Una H.P., on his furnishing

personal bond to the tune of Rs.25,000/-, with one surety

in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Investigating

Officer, subject to the following conditions:-

1. That the petitioner will join
investigation of case as and when
called for by the Investigating
Officer, in accordance with law.

2. That he will not directly or
indirectly make any inducement,
threat or promise to any person
acquainted with the facts of the
case so as to dissuade him/her

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
from disclosing such facts to the
Investigating Officer or Court.

3. That he will not tamper with the
prosecution evidence nor he will
try to win over the prosecution

witnesses in any manner;

4. That he will not leave India
without prior permission of the

Court.

This order shall remain in force till 09.11.2023,

on which date, status report be filed by respondent/State.

( Sushil Kukreja
)
Judge

13th October, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
Kuldeep Sharma vs. State of H.P.

Cr.MPM No.2645 of

2023

13.10.2023 Present: Mr. Vivek Singh Attri & Mr. Ankit Kaloti,

Advocates, for the petitioner.

Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General,
for the respondent/State.

r to
Notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional

Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice

on behalf of the respondent /State. He prays for and is

granted three weeks’ time to file status report.

Heard. In the interim, it is ordered that petitioner

shall be released on bail, in the event of his arrest in case

FIR No.133/2023, dated 09.10.2023, under Sections 324,

341, 147, 148 and 149 of Indian Penal Code, registered at

Police Station Gagret, District Una H.P., on his furnishing

personal bond to the tune of Rs.25,000/-, with one surety

in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Investigating

Officer, subject to the following conditions:-

1. That the petitioner will join
investigation of case as and when
called for by the Investigating
Officer, in accordance with law.

2. That he will not directly or
indirectly make any inducement,
threat or promise to any person
acquainted with the facts of the
case so as to dissuade him/her

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
from disclosing such facts to the
Investigating Officer or Court.

3. That he will not tamper with the
prosecution evidence nor he will
try to win over the prosecution

witnesses in any manner;

4. That he will not leave India
without prior permission of the

Court.

This order shall remain in force till 09.11.2023,

on which date, status report be filed by respondent/State.

( Sushil Kukreja
)
Judge

13th October, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
Sunil Kumar alias Sonu vs. State of H.P.

Cr.MP(M) No.2371 of 2023

13.10.2023 Present: Mr. Rohit Chauhan, Advocate, for the
petitioner.

Mr. Jitender Sharma, Additional Advocate
General, for the respondent/State.

Status report stands filed.

Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for

an adjournment to go through the same.

As prayed, list on 16.10.2023.

( Sushil
Kukreja )

Judge

13th October, 2023

(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
Suraj vs. State of H.P.

Cr.MP(M) No.2374 of 2023

13.10.2023 Present: Mr. M.A. Safee, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Jitender Sharma, Additional Advocate
General, for the respondent/State.

ASI, Shamim Akhtar, I.O. Police Station

Parwanoo, District Solan, H.P. present with
record.

Status report stands filed.

Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for

an adjournment to go through the same.

As prayed, list on 06.11.2023.

( Sushil
Kukreja )

Judge

13th October, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
Manmeet Singh vs. State of H.P.

Cr.MP(M) No.2399 of 2023

13.10.2023 Present: Mr. Basant Pal Thakur, Advocate, for the
petitioner.

Mr. Jitender Sharma, Additional Advocate
General, for the respondent/State.

ASI Ramesh Chand, I.O. Police Station
Kandaghat, District Solan, present with
record.

Learned Additional Advocate General prays

for and is granted two weeks’ further time to file status

report.

As prayed, list on 06.11.2023.

( Sushil

Kukreja )
Judge

13th October, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
Bal Krishan vs. Smt. Kirna Devi & others

Cr.MP(M) No.2608 of 2023

13.10.2023 Present: Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate, for the applicant.

Cr.MP No.3870 of 2023

For the reasons stated in the application, the

delay in re-filing the present revision petition is condoned.

Application stands disposed of.

Cr.MP(M) No.2608 of 2023

Issue notice to the respondents, returnable

for 13.12.2023, on taking steps within a period of three

days.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

13th October, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
Kamlesh vs. Central Bureau of
Investigation

Cr. Appeal No.225 of 2023

13.10.2023 Present: Mr. Anirudh Sharma, Advocate, for the

appellant.

Mr. A.K. Bansal, Advocate, for the respondet-
CBI.

Cr.MP No.3886 of 2023

Learned counsel for the applicant/appellant

seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present

application with liberty to file an appropriate application.

In view of the above, present application is

dismissed, as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid.

Application stands disposed of.

Cr. Appeal No.225 of 2023

As prayed, list on 17.10.2023.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

13th October, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
Sh. Suraj Gupta vs. State of H.P.

Cr. Appeal No.467 of 2023

13.10.2023 Present: Mr. Ajay Kashyap, Advocate, for the
appellant.

Mr. Jitender Sharma, Additional Advocate
General, for the respondent/State.

Cr. Appeal No.467 of 2023

Admit.

Post Admission Notice.

Mr. Jitender Sharma, learned Additional

Advocate General, appears and waives service of post

admission notice on behalf of the respondent/State.

Record of learned court below be called for.

Cr.MP No.3907 of 2023

The present application has been filed under

Section 389 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C) for

suspension of sentence during the pendency of the present

appeal.

I have heard learned counsel for the

applicant/appellant, learned Additional Advocate General for the

respondent/State and also gone through the material available

on record.

The appeal pertains to the year 2023 and the

same is not likely to be taken up for hearing in the near

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
future. It is not in dispute that the applicant was on bail

during trial and never misused the liberty so granted to him.

Hence, taking into consideration the sentence

awarded to the applicant, i.e. two years under Section 498-A

IPC and six months, under Section 323 of IPC and the fact

that the present appeal stands admitted for hearing, it is

ordered that the substantive sentence imposed upon the

applicant/appellant, vide judgment of conviction and order of

sentence, dated 15.09.2023, passed by learned Additional

Sessions Judge, (CBI Court), Shimla in Case No.15-S/7 of

2021 (CIS CNR NO. HPSH100058062021) titled State of

H.P. vs. Sh. Suraj Gupta, shall remain suspended till final

disposal of the appeal, however, subject to the applicant’s

furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with one

surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court

and also depositing the fine amount, if not already deposited,

within a period of two weeks from today, undertaking therein

to appear in the Court as and when directed and in the event

of the dismissal of the appeal, the applicant will surrender

before the Court to undergo sentence, if any, imposed by the

Court.

The application stands disposed of.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
13th October, 2023

          (reena)






             r            to









                           ::: Downloaded on - 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS

Karamjeet Kumar vs. State of H.P.

Cr. Appeal No.469 of 2023

13.10.2023 Present: Mr. Virender Singh Rathore, Advocate, for the
appellant.

Mr. Jitender Sharma, Additional Advocate
General, for the respondent/State.

Cr. Appeal No.469 of 2023

r Admit.

Post Admission Notice.

Mr. Jitender Sharma, learned Additional

Advocate General, appears and waives service of post

admission notice on behalf of the respondent/State.

Record of learned court below be called for.

Cr.MP No.3911 of 2023

Learned Additional Advocate General prays for

and is granted three weeks’ time to file reply.

As prayed, list for consideration on 06.11.2023.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

13th October, 2023
(reena)

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
Sh. Jagsir Singh vs. Central Bureau of
Investigations, Shimla

Cr. Revision No.549 of 2023

13.10.2023 Present: Mr. Virender Singh, Advocate, for the

petitioner.

Mr. Anshul Bansal, Advocate, for the
respondent.

r to
Cr.MP No. 3910/2023

Notice. Mr.Anshul Bansal, learned counsel,

appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the

respondent. He prays for and is granted four weeks’

time to file reply.

As prayed, list on 21.11.2023.

( Sushil

Kukreja )
Judge

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
Mrs. Harpriya Manhas vs. State of H.P.

Cr.MMO No.1095 of

2023

13.10.2023 Present: Mr. Kashmir Singh Thakur, Advocate, for the

petitioner.

Mr. Jitender Sharma, Additional Advocate
General, for the respondent/State.

r 3906/2023

Notice.


                         Cr.MMO No.1095/2023


                                     Mr.   Jitender
                                                         &


                                                        Sharma,
                                                                Cr.MP         No.


                                                                        learned

Additional Advocate General appears and waives

service of notice on behalf of the respondent/State. He

prays for and is granted three weeks’ time to file reply.

As prayed, list on 08.11.2023.

In the meantime, learned trial Court is

directed not to pass the final order in Case Complaint

No.522/2022, titled State of H.P. vs. Mrs. Harpriya

Manhas, during the pendency of the present petition.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
Mrs. Harpriya Manhas vs. State of H.P.

Cr.MMO No.1094 of

2023

13.10.2023 Present: Mr. Kashmir Singh Thakur, Advocate, for the

petitioner.

Mr. Jitender Sharma, Additional Advocate
General, for the respondent/State.

r 3905/2023

Notice.


                         Cr.MMO No.1094/2023


                                     Mr.   Jitender
                                                         &


                                                        Sharma,
                                                                Cr.MP         No.


                                                                        learned

Additional Advocate General appears and waives

service of notice on behalf of the respondent/State. He

prays for and is granted three weeks’ time to file reply.

As prayed, list on 08.11.2023.

In the meantime, learned trial Court is

directed not to pass the final order in Case Complaint

No.525/2022, titled State of H.P. vs. Mrs. Harpriya

Manhas, during the pendency of the present petition.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
Mrs. Harpriya Manhas vs. State of H.P.

Cr.MMO No.1093 of

2023

13.10.2023 Present: Mr. Kashmir Singh Thakur, Advocate, for the

petitioner.

Mr. Jitender Sharma, Additional Advocate
General, for the respondent/State.

r 3904/2023

Notice.


                         Cr.MMO No.1093/2023


                                     Mr.   Jitender
                                                         &


                                                        Sharma,
                                                                Cr.MP         No.


                                                                        learned

Additional Advocate General appears and waives

service of notice on behalf of the respondent/State. He

prays for and is granted three weeks’ time to file reply.

As prayed, list on 08.11.2023.

In the meantime, learned trial Court is

directed not to pass the final order in Case Complaint

No.620/2019, titled State of H.P. vs. Mrs. Harpriya

Manhas, during the pendency of the present petition.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
Mrs. Harpriya Manhas vs. State of H.P.

Cr.MMO No.1092 of

2023

13.10.2023 Present: Mr. Kashmir Singh Thakur, Advocate, for the

petitioner.

Mr. Jitender Sharma, Additional Advocate
General, for the respondent/State.

r 3903/2023

Notice.


                         Cr.MMO No.1092/2023


                                     Mr.   Jitender
                                                         &


                                                        Sharma,
                                                                Cr.MP         No.


                                                                        learned

Additional Advocate General appears and waives

service of notice on behalf of the respondent/State. He

prays for and is granted three weeks’ time to file reply.

As prayed, list on 08.11.2023.

In the meantime, learned trial Court is

directed not to pass the final order in Case Complaint

No.622/2019, titled State of H.P. vs. Mrs. Harpriya

Manhas, during the pendency of the present petition.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge

::: Downloaded on – 25/07/2025 21:29:00 :::CIS
Mrs. Harpriya Manhas vs. State of H.P.

Cr.MMO No.1091 of

2023

13.10.2023 Present: Mr. Kashmir Singh Thakur, Advocate, for the

petitioner.

Mr. Jitender Sharma, Additional Advocate
General, for the respondent/State.

r 3902/2023

Notice.


                         Cr.MMO No.1091/2023


                                     Mr.   Jitender
                                                         &


                                                        Sharma,
                                                                Cr.MP         No.


                                                                        learned

Additional Advocate General appears and waives

service of notice on behalf of the respondent/State. He

prays for and is granted three weeks’ time to file reply.

As prayed, list on 08.11.2023.

In the meantime, learned trial Court is

directed not to pass the final order in Case Complaint

No.523/2022, titled State of H.P. vs. Mrs. Harpriya

Manhas, during the pendency of the present petition.

( Sushil
Kukreja )
Judge