further submits that the co-accused Ishwar Singh and Shyam
Singh have already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide
order dated 14.11.2024. He further submits that case of the
petitioner is not distinguishable with that of the case of the
aforesaid co-accused who have already been enlarged on bail.
3. Contrary to the submissions of learned counsel for the
petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail
application and submits that the present case is not fit for
enlargement of accused on bail.
4. I have considered the submissions made by both the parties
and have perused the material available on record.
Co-accused Ishwar Singh and Shyam Singh have already been
enlarged on bail vide order dated 14.11.2024. Thus, on the
ground of parity and considering the fact that there is high
probability that the trial may take long time to conclude, it is
deemed suitable to grant the benefit of bail to the petitioner
in the present matter.