Rajasthan High Court – Jaipur
Madhav S/O Shri Hajarilal vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jp:22612) on 30 May, 2025
Author: Sameer Jain
Bench: Sameer Jain
[2025:RJ-JP:22612]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2289/2025
1. Madhav S/o Shri Hajarilal, Age About 27 Years, R/o Beru
Ka Nagla, Police Station Magora, District Mathura, Uttar
Pradesh.
2. Shishupal S/o Shri Radheshyam, Age About 34 Years, R/o
Beru Ka Nagla, Magora, District Mathura, Uttar Pradesh.
3. Manoj Kumar S/o Late Shri Mohan Singh, Age About 29
Years, R/o Budwari Khurd, Police Station Nadbai, District
Bharatpur, Rajasthan.
----Accused/Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor.
—-Respondent
2. Anurag Sagwan Son Of Late Shri Pushpendar Singh, R/o
Gali No. 11, Kashganj Road, Nadbai, Police Station
Nadbai, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan.
—-Complainant-Respondent
Connected With
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2286/2025
Vishal Alias Nepali S/o Shri Munesh, R/o Village Kumha Ka Was,
Penghor, Police Station Kumher, District- Bharatpur, Rajasthan.
—-Accused/Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor.
—Respondent
2. Anurag Sagwan Son Of Late Shri Pushpendar Singh, R/o
Gali No. 11, Kashganj Road, Nadbai, Police Station
Nadbai, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan.
—-Complainant/Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sukhdev Singh Solanki
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Pradeep Kumar Meena for
Mr. Aniket Sharma
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Judgment
30/05/2025
By way of present petition, order dated 09.04.2025 is put to
challenge. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that
at the initial stage, the petitioners were called for the cross-
(Downloaded on 03/06/2025 at 09:48:10 PM)
[2025:RJ-JP:22612] (2 of 5) [CRLMP-2289/2025]
examination, whereby, they have turned hostile. It is further
submitted that recalling of them by way of impugned order is not
justified and in support of the said contention, reliance is placed
upon the dictum encapsulated in judgment passed by Hon’ble
Apex Court in Mishrilal and Ors. Vs. State of M.P. and
Ors.2005(2)ACR1744(SC).
Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has submitted that
charge sheet in the matter is filed relying upon the statements of
present petitioners, as they were the backbone of the present
matter. However, they have turned hostile at a later stage. The
reasons for the same is given in the relevant para of the impugned
order, which is reproduced herein below as under:
“blh izdkj fo}ku vf/koDrk vfHk;qDrx.k dh
vksj ls izLrqr U;kf;d n`”Vkar 2022¼1½ Crime 495
(M.P.) lchhashankar Vs. State of M.P. esa fupyhvnkyr }kjk ikfjr vkns’k dh pqukSrh nsrs gq, vkosnd
ds odhy us nyhy nh xbZ fd ;g dkuwu dk
lqLFkkfir fl)kar gS fd fdlh Hkh i{k dks mlds
odhy dh v{kerk ds dkj.k uqdlku ugha mBkuk
pkfg,A xokg deys’k ¼ihMCY;w&2½ vkSj vafcdk izlkn
¼ihMCY;w&3½ egRoiw.kZ xokg gSa vkSj muds igys ds
odhy izHkkoh <ax ls ftjg ugha dj lds FksA mDr
ekeys esa ekuuh; e/; izns’k mPPk U;k;ky; }kjk ;g
vfHkfu/kkZfjr djrs gq, vihy [kkfjt dh fd odhy
dk ifjorZu xokgksa dks okil cqykus dk vk/kkj ugha
gks ldrkA tcfd gLrxr ekeys esa Lo;a ifjoknh
vuqjkx lkxoku] xokg gjnsoh ,oa cnu flag i{knzksgh
?kksf”kr gq, gSa rFkk mUgha rF;ksa ds laca/k esa mDr lk{;
(Downloaded on 03/06/2025 at 09:48:10 PM)
[2025:RJ-JP:22612] (3 of 5) [CRLMP-2289/2025]
ds i’pkr nhokuh izdj.k la[;k 48@2022 esa fHkUu
dFku fd, gSaA i=koyh ds voyksdu ls Li”V gS fd
bl izdj.k esa ifjoknh ih-MCY;w-02 vuqjkx lkxoku
ds c;ku fnukad 30-04-2024 dks] xokg ihMCY;w-01
Jherh gjnsoh ds c;ku fnukad 16-04-2024 dks ,oa
ih-MCY;w-03 cnu flag ds c;ku fnukad 22-05-2024
dks ys[kc) gq, gSa tks rhuksa gh xokg i{knzksgh ?kksf”kr
gq, gSaA mDr lkf{k;ksa esa xokg ih-MCY;w-01 Jherh
gjnsoh ,oa ih-MCY;w-02 vuqjkx lkxoku vkjksihx.k dh
igpku ds laca/k esa i{knzksgh ?kksf”kr gq, gSa rFkk xokg
ih-MCY;w-03 cnu flag vkjksih lq’khyk }kjk ,DlhMsaV
Dyse jkf’k] ukSdjh o vU; Q.M jkf’k pkgus ,oa
vuqla/kku ds nkSjku rS;kj dh xbZ QnksZa ds laca/k esa
i{knzksgh ?kksf”kr gqvk gSA mDr rhuksa gh xokg izdj.k
ds egRoiw.kZ xokg gSa] ftudh vuqla/kku ds nkSjku nh
xbZ lk{; ds vk/kkj ij vijk/k izekf.kr ekurs gq,
vkjksi&i= izLrqr fd;k x;k gS tcfd mDr xokgku
U;k;ky; ds le{k i{knzksgh ?kksf”kr gq, gSaA mDr
xokgksa ds i{knzksgh gksus dk dkj.k fo}ku vfHk;kstu
vf/kdkjh }kjk Li”V fd;k x;k gS fd bUgha i{kdkjksa
ds e/; yfEcr nhokuh okn la[;k 48@2022 esa xokg
vuqjkx lkxoku }kjk eqyfteku i{k ls mlds firk
Lo- iq”isUnz flag dh lEifRr esa ls eqyftek lq’khyk }
kjk iq”isUnz flag dh nwljh iRuh gksus ls bl vkijkf/kd
izdj.k ls i`Fkd vFkkZr nks”keqDr djokus dh ,ot esa
viuk fgLlk ifjoknh vuqjkx lkxoku dks gh NksM+us
dk dFku fd;k tkuk crk;k gS ,oa mlh fnokuh
izdj.k esa xokg vuqjkx lkxoku us vius dFkuksa esa
jkensbZ ls jkthukek gksus ds vuqlkj isa’ku o vuqdEik
fu;qfDr Lo;a dks ,oa vU; ykHk&ifjykHk jkensbZ dks
(Downloaded on 03/06/2025 at 09:48:10 PM)
[2025:RJ-JP:22612] (4 of 5) [CRLMP-2289/2025]feyus dk dFku fd;k gSA mDr rF;ksa dh Ikqf”V ds
fy, mDr rhuksa gh xokgku ih-MCY;w-01 Jherh
gjnsoh] ih-MCY;w-02 vuqjkx lkxoku ,oa ih-MCY;w-03
cnuflag ds blh otg ls i{knzksgh gksus ls mUgsa
U;k;ky; esa ryc dj muls iqu% ijh{k.k djus dh
izkFkZuk dh xbZ gSA /kkjk 311 n-iz-la- esa ;g Li”V :i
ls micaf/kr fd;k x;k gS fd U;k;ky; dks ekeys ds
U;k;laxr fofu’p; ds fy, fdlh ,sls O;fDr dh
lk{; vko’;d izrhr gksrh gS rks og ,sls O;fDr dks
leu djsxk] mldh ijh{kk djsxk] mls iqu% cqyk
ldsxk o mldh iqu% ijh{kk dj ldsxkA bl izdkj
/kkjk 311 n-iz-la- esa Li”V :i ls micaf/kr gS fd
fdlh O;fDr dks ftldh igys lk{; ys[kc) dh tk
pqdh gS] U;k;ky; ekeys ds U;k;laxr fofu’p; ds
fy, iqu% cqyk ldrk gS vkSj mldh iqu% ijh{kk dj
ldrk gSA gLrxr izdj.k esa vHkh c;ku eqyfte
ys[kc) ugha gq, gSA ,slh fLFkfr esa fo}ku vf/koDrk
vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls izLrqr U;kf;d n`”Vkar
gLrxr izdj.k ds rF;ksa ls fHkUurk ds dkj.k pLik
ugha gksrs gSA
fygktk] izdj.k ds rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa
izdj.k ds fof/kiw.kZ U;k;&fu.kZ;u ds fy, vfHk;kstu
dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g izkFkZuki= varxZr /kkjk 311 na-
iz-la- Lohdkj fd;k tkuk U;k;ksfpr izrhr gksrk gSA
fygktk] fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd dh vksj ls izLrqr
izkFkZuki= varxZr /kkjk 311 na-iz-la- Lohdkj dj vkns’k
fn;k tkrk gS fd xokg ih-MCY;w-01 Jherh gjnsoh]
ih-MCY;w-02 vuqjkx lkxoku ,oa ih-MCY;w-03 cnu
flag dks vkxkeh rkjh[k is’kh ij lk{; gsrq tfj;s(Downloaded on 03/06/2025 at 09:48:10 PM)
[2025:RJ-JP:22612] (5 of 5) [CRLMP-2289/2025]tekurh okj.V rknknh 2]000@& :i;s ls ryc
fd;k tkosA”
Upon perusal of the same, it is noted that learned trial Court
has relied upon the provisions of Section 311 of Cr.P.C and as per
the settled position of law, re-calling of the material witnesses on
account of subsequent development, is permissible to enforce and
administer justice.
Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed. Pending
application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
(SAMEER JAIN),J
GAURAV/515-516
(Downloaded on 03/06/2025 at 09:48:10 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)