Madhu Kantha Kapoor vs The State Of Telangana on 25 July, 2025

0
1


(per the Hon’ble Sri Justice P.Sam Koshy)

These are batch of writ petitions where the grievance of all the petitioners

is common. Hence, in terms of the agreement that was arrived at during the

course of hearing, the Bench proceeded to hear all these batch matters

analogously and also decided to pass a common order.

2. Heard Mr. Rajkumar Gummi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr.

Karunakar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners in Writ Petition

Nos.20932, 27542, 28636, 29277, 31084 and 32535 of 2024, Mr. P.Suresh

Reddy, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. Dayakar Reddy,

learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. G.Raman Goud, learned counsel for the

petitioners, Mr. D.Laxminarayana, learned counsel for the petitioners in Writ

Petition Nos.30114, 30941, 31063, 31772, 31775, 32458 and 34179 of 2024,

Mr. P.Suresh Reddy, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of Mr.

Ponurupar Suman, learned counsel for the petitioner in Writ Petition No.32887

of 2024, and Mr. Goda Shiva, learned Senior Counsel representing Mr. Ajgal

Ravi Babu, learned Standing Counsel for State Bank of India in Writ Petition

Nos. 32458, 30941, 30114, 31063, 31775, 31772, 34179 and 32887 of 2024,

Mr. B.S.Prasad, learned Senior Counsel representing Mr. Ajgal Ravi Babu,

learned Standing Counsel for State Bank of Hyderabad in Writ Petition

Nos.32535, 20932, 28636, 31084, 27542 and 29277 of 2024.



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here