Madhu Sadhotra S/O Jagattar Sadhotra vs Ut Of J&K Through Sho Police Station on 5 August, 2025

0
1

Jammu & Kashmir High Court

Madhu Sadhotra S/O Jagattar Sadhotra vs Ut Of J&K Through Sho Police Station on 5 August, 2025

                                                                    Serial No. 32

 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
                                AT JAMMU
CRM(M) No. 994/2023
CrlM No. 1995/2023

  1. Madhu Sadhotra S/O Jagattar Sadhotra
  2. Chander Hass@ Chamail Sadhotra S/O Jagattar Sadhotra
  3. Rakesh Kumar @ Sonu Sadhotra S/O Jagattar Sadhotra
  4. Kiran Kumari W/O Jagattar Sadhotra
  5. Neha W/O Chander Hass
     All Residents of Nai Basti, Narayana, Tehsil Khour
     District Jammu                                .....Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)


                       Through: Mr. Sandeep Singh, Advocate with
                                Mr. Adarsh Veer Singh, Advocate
                 vs
  1. UT of J&K through SHO Police Station, Khour
  2. Rashmi Bhagat D/O Balwant Singh
     R/o Kote Maira, Tehsil Khour,
     District Jammu                                              .......Respondents


                       Through: Mr. P.D Singh, Dy.AG for R- 1
                                Mr. Sunil Dogra, Advocate for R- 2

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MA CHOWDHARY, JUDGE
                                    ORDER

(05.08.2025)

1. Petitioners, through the medium of this petition, have sought

quashment of FIR No. 102/2023 dated 15.11.2023 for the commission of

offences punishable under Sections 376/354/504/506/34 IPC, registered with

Police Station, Khour against the petitioners at the behest of the respondent no.

2, on the grounds that they have been falsely implicated by the complainant

with an intention to compel petitioner no. 1 to marry her on the allegations of

breach of promise of marriage.

2. The learned counsel for the respondent-Union Territory of J&K has

filed the latest status report dated 05.08.2025 in the case formulated by SHO,
2 CRM(M) No. 994/2023
CrlM No. 1995/2023

Police Station, Khour stating therein that on investigation no offence has been

made against any of the petitioner Nos.2 to 5 and they have been given the

benefit under Section 169 CrPC. However, as per investigation, the charge-

sheet has been contemplated against the petitioner no.1-Madhu Sadotra, who is

alleged to have committed an offence punishable under Section 376 IPC, which

has been proved during the investigation.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners at this stage submits that, in view

of the investigation carried out by the investigating agency, the petition may be

disposed of with liberty to the respondent-Union Territory of J&K to lay

charge-sheet before the competent court of law. His statement is taken on

record.

4. In view of the investigation carried out, the present petition is

disposed of with the liberty to the respondent-Union Territory of J&K to lay the

charge-sheet as contemplated.

5. The petitioner no.1, however, shall be at liberty to raise the plea as

raised in this petition, at the time of consideration of the charge sheet against

him before the trial court.

6. Petition is thus disposed of, accordingly, alongwith connected

applications(s). No order as to costs.

(MA CHOWDHARY)
JUDGE

Jammu
05.08.2025
Sapna

Sapna Bamotra
2025.08.06 17:15
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here