Mahendra Bhadu vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:13202) on 10 March, 2025

0
7

Rajasthan High Court – Jodhpur

Mahendra Bhadu vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:13202) on 10 March, 2025

Author: Yogendra Kumar Purohit

Bench: Yogendra Kumar Purohit

[2025:RJ-JD:13202]

        HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                         JODHPUR
     S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous IInd Bail Application No. 2626/2025

Mahendra Bhadu S/o Om Prakash, Aged About 22 Years, R/o
Bhaduo Ka Bas,khejarli Kallan, P.s. Luni Dist Jodhpur (At Present
Lodged In Central Jail, Jodhpur)
                                                                    ----Petitioner
                                     Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
                                                                  ----Respondent


For Petitioner(s)          :     Mr. Birbal Ram Bishnoi
For Respondent(s)          :     Mr. Hanuman Prajapati, PP



       HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT

Order

10/03/2025

1. The instant second bail application has been filed by the

applicant under Section 483 BNSS (439 Cr.P.C.). The applicant

has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 342/2024

registered at Police Station Banar, District Jodhpur for the

offence(s) under Section 281, 125, 132, 121(1), 109(1),

115(2), 303(2), 3(5) of BNS, 3 of PDPP Act and 4/21 of

MMRD Act.

2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that the

applicant has been falsely implicated in the case. He further

submits that first bail application was dismissed as not pressed by

this Court vide order dated 11.12.2024 with liberty to file fresh

bail application after statement of injured Ramlal and Rajendra.

Now, their statement have been recorded and no grievous injury

has been caused by the accused-applicant. Co-accused Kailash

has already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated

(Downloaded on 10/03/2025 at 09:48:01 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:13202] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-2626/2025]

11.12.2024 in SB Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 13799/2024.

The applicant is behind the bars. The trial may take long time to

conclude. Thus, learned counsel submitted that the applicant may

be enlarged on bail.

3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed

the bail application.

4. Considering the arguments advanced by the counsel for the

parties and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the

case, without commenting on the merits and demerits of the case,

this court deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-

applicant on bail.

5. Accordingly, the second bail application under Section 483

BNSS (439 Cr.P.C.) is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-

applicant Mahendra Bhadu S/o Om Prakash arrested in

connection with aforesaid FIR shall be enlarged on bail provided

he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two

sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned

lower court for his appearance before the court concerned on all

the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.

(YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT),J
8-Jatin/-

(Downloaded on 10/03/2025 at 09:48:01 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here