Mahesh Chandra vs State (2025:Rj-Jd:35337-Db) on 8 August, 2025

0
4

Instant criminal appeal has been filed by the appellant

against the judgment dated 27.08.2015 passed by learned District

and Session Judge, Jaisalmer, in Sessions Case No.97/2012 by

which the learned Trial Court convicted and sentenced the

appellants as under:

S.No. Offence U/s Sentence Fine Sentence in
default of fine

1. 304-B IPC Life — —

imprisonment

2. 498-A IPC 3 years RI Rs.5,000/- 3 months RI

Both the sentences were ordered to run concurrently.

Brief facts necessary to be noted for deciding the controversy

are that on 29.08.2012, complainant Murlidhar Bohra submitted a

written report (Ex-P/1) to the concerned Police Station to the

[2025:RJ-JD:35337-DB] (2 of 12) [CRLA-936/2015]

effect that marriage of his sister Gayatri @ Benu was solemnized

with the accused-appellant on 21.11.2007. Just after marriage,

the in-laws of his sister started harassing her for dowry. It was

further alleged that after one month of marriage, accused-

appellant and his family members beat the complainant’s sister.

Later on, compromise was arrived at between the parties and the

complainant’s sister again started living with the accused-

appellant at Jaisalmer. Even after that, again the appellant

subjected the complainant’s sister physically and mentally and

continuously raised demand for dowry. Upon which, an amount of

Rs.25,000/- was given by the complainant to the accused-

appellant. It was further submitted that the complainant’s sister

started working in a company. One day, when the complainant’s

sister returned home after office, she found the accused-appellant

in objectionable situation with a woman. That act of the accused-

appellant was informed to the complainant by his sister. Upon

which, the complainant visited Jaisalmer, where a social meeting

was held in this regard in which, the accused-appellant accepted

his mistake and gave assurance for not repeating such type of act.

Subsequently, on 24.08.2012 at about 6:30 PM, the deceased

talked to her mother on phone, but after 7:00 PM, the mobile

phone of the deceased was continuously switched off. Then, at

about 10:00 PM in the night, the neighbour informed the

complainant on mobile about the ill health of his sister. On such

information, they proceeded for Jaisalmer and on the way, they

received information about the death of complainant’s sister in

suspicious condition and her dead-body was being taken to

Phalodi. Upon reaching at Phalodi, the complainant talked with the

[2025:RJ-JD:35337-DB] (3 of 12) [CRLA-936/2015]

accused-appellant about death of his sister, upon which the

relatives and other persons of the society, make them understand

to keep silent and then, cremation of dead-body of the

complainant’s sister was performed. Subsequently, after few days

of cremation, the complainant on being high suspicion about the

murder of his sister by the accused-appellant, submitted this

written report to the Police.



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here