[ad_1]
Rajasthan High Court – Jaipur
Manglaram Urf Mangliya S/O Shri Madaram vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jp:16919) on 22 April, 2025
Author: Sameer Jain
Bench: Sameer Jain
[2025:RJ-JP:16919]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2246/2025
1. Manglaram Urf Mangliya S/o Shri Madaram, R/o Lavera,
Jodhpur Rural.
2. Sawai S/o Meetaram, R/o Village Baleta Malakheda,
District Alwar Rajasthan.
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Learned Public
Prosecutor.
2. Moolchand @ Mulya S/o Sharwan, R/o Baleta, Malakheda,
District Alwar, Rajasthan.
—-Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shiv Prakash Dhanera
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP
Mr. B. L. Dhakhar with
Mr. Porush Sharma
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Judgment
22/04/2025
1. This petition under Section 528 of BNSS is filed, with a
prayer to quash the FIR No. 34/2025 registered at Police Station
Malakheda District Alwar for offences under Sections 115(2),
126(2), 352 BNS and Section 3(2)(VA), 3(1)(R) and 3(1)(S) of
ST/SC Act, on the basis of compromise effectuated between the
parties herein, in respect of their inter-se dispute.
2. Learned counsel for both the parties have submitted that the
dispute at hand is inter-se private in nature, which has been
resolved by the parties amicably.
3. Heard and considered.
(Downloaded on 28/04/2025 at 10:09:15 PM)
[2025:RJ-JP:16919] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-2246/2025]
4. At the outset, this Court deems it appropriate to place
reliance upon the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in
Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab [(2012) 10 SCC 303] and
Ramgopal Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh reported in
[2022 (14) SCC 531], relevant portion of which is reproduced
below:
“12. The High Court, therefore, having regard to the
nature of the offence and the fact that parties have
amicably settled their dispute and the victim has willingly
consented to the nullification of criminal proceedings, can
quash such proceedings in exercise of its inherent powers
under Section 482 Cr.P.C., even if the offences are non-
compoundable.”
5. In view of the position of law laid down by the Hon’ble Apex
Court in aforementioned case, and considering the personal nature
of dispute, which has been amicably settled between parties, this
Court deems it just and proper to allow the present misc. petition.
Compromise is taken on record.
6. Considering the aforementioned, the present criminal
miscellaneous petition is allowed and the FIR No. 34/2025
registered at Police Station Malakheda District Alwar for offences
under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 352 BNS and Section 3(2)(VA),
3(1)(R) and 3(1)(S) of ST/SC Act with all consequential
proceedings, are hereby quashed and set aside.
7. Accordingly, the instant petition is allowed. Pending
application(s), if any, stand disposed of.
(SAMEER JAIN),J
Pooja /29
(Downloaded on 28/04/2025 at 10:09:15 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
[ad_2]
Source link