Manish Kumar Sharma And Another vs State Of Himachal Pradesh on 21 January, 2025

0
82

Himachal Pradesh High Court

Manish Kumar Sharma And Another vs State Of Himachal Pradesh on 21 January, 2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Cr. MMO No.64/2025.

Date of Decision: 21 st January, 2025.

Manish Kumar Sharma and another
…..Petitioners.

Versus

State of Himachal Pradesh
…..Respondent
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander Negi, Vacation Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1

For the Petitioners: Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, Sr. Advocate, with Mr.
C.D. Negi, Advocate.

For the Respondent: Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma and Mr. Harinder
Rawat Additional Advocates General with Ms.
Swati Draik, Deputy Advocate General.

ASI Rita Kumari, W.P.S. Dharamshala, present
in person.

Bipin Chander Negi, Vacation Judge (oral).

By way of instant petition filed under Section 528 of the BNSS,

a prayer has been made on behalf of the petitioners for quashing of FIR

No.01 of 2025 dated 05.01.2025, under Sections 64, 69 and 351(2) of

BNS, 2023, registered at Women Police Station, Dharamshala District

Kangra, H.P., as well as consequential judicial proceedings arising out of

the same.

2. The averments contained in the petition, which are duly

supported by an affidavit reveal that on 05.01.2025, petitioner No.2 had

got a FIR registered against the petitioner No.1-accused, under Sections

under Sections 64, 69 and 351(2) of BNS, 2023. However, during the

pendency of proceedings, the dispute inter se parties has been settled

1
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2

amicably vide compromise dated 09.01.2025, copy whereof is appended

alongwith the present petition as Exhibit P-1. In terms of the

compromise, Petitioner No.2 got married with petitioner No.1 (Manish

Kumar Sharma) on 08.01.2025. Copy of the marriage certificate duly

attested by the parties is taken on record.

3. Statement of petitioner No.2 stands recorded. She has

categorically stated that she has entered into a compromise of her own

free will, volition and without any pressure. According to the petitioner

No.2, the dispute inter se parties stands amicably settled.

4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the

record carefully.

5. This Court sees no impediment in quashing the FIR in issue, as

the dispute inter se parties stands amicably resolved.

6. From a perusal of Section 359 of the BNSS (320 Cr.PC), it is

evident that the offences under Section 64 of the BNS, 2023 is not

compoundable.

7. In this respect, attention of this Court has been drawn to a case

titled Narinder Singh and others vs. State of Punjab and another

reported as (2014) 6 Supreme Court Cases, 466, wherein the Apex

Court has categorically laid down that the High Court has inherent power

to quash the criminal proceedings even in those cases, which are not

compoundable, where the parties have amicably settled the matter inter

se them. However, this power is to be exercised sparingly and with

caution, in cases where settlement is arrived at. The guiding factors
3

being securing the ends of justice or to prevent an abuse of the process

of any Court.

8. Further, the Apex Court in Parbatbhai Aahir alias

Parbathbhai Bhimsinghbhai Karmur and others vs. State of

Gujarat and another, (2017) 9 SCC 641 summarizing the broad

principles regarding inherent powers of the High Court under Section 482

Cr.P.C. has recognized that these powers are not inhibited by provisions

of Section 320 Cr.P.C.

9. In view of the fact that the parties have entered into

compromise permitting the proceedings in pursuance to the aforesaid FIR

sought to be quashed to continue would only result into an abuse of

process and the same would not secure the ends of justice.

10. Accordingly, the petition is allowed. FIR No.01 of 2025 dated

05.01.2025, under Sections 64, 69 and 351(2) of BNS, 2023, registered

at Women Police Station, Dharamshala District Kangra, H.P., is quashed

and consequent judicial proceedings arising out of the same are also

quashed.

11. The petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the

pending application(s), if any.

(Bipin Chander Negi)
Vacation Judge

21st January, 2025 (tarun)



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here