Rajasthan High Court – Jaipur
Manjeet Singh S/O Iqbal Singh vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jp:27465) on 23 July, 2025
Author: Ganesh Ram Meena
Bench: Ganesh Ram Meena
[2025:RJ-JP:27465]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Third Bail Application No.
8330/2025
Manjeet Singh S/o Iqbal Singh, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Dudhi
Police Station Nanakmatta, District Udhamsingh Nagar,
Uttarakhand. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Kishangarhbas)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manjeet Kumar
For Complainant(s) : Mr. R.K.Gauttam &
Mr. G.S. Gauttam
For State : Ms. Aarti Sharma PP with
Mr. Devendra Prasad, Police Inspector,
S.H.O., Police Station, Bhiwadi Raj.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Order
23/07/2025
1. The accused-petitioner has filed this third bail
application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. arising out of F.I.R.
No.692/2023 registered with the Police Station Bhiwadi, District
Bhiwadi for offence under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471, 120-
B & 506 of IPC.
2. The first bail application bearing No.12159/2024 was
dismissed by this Court vide order dated 10.10.2024 and the
second bail application bearing No.15261/2024 was dismissed as
withdrawn by this Court vide order dated 06.01.2025.
3. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that
the allegation as has been levelled against the accused petitioner
is that he prepared a forged Aadhar Card in the name of Manjeet
(Downloaded on 29/07/2025 at 09:48:17 PM)
[2025:RJ-JP:27465] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-8330/2025]
Singh S/o Khajan Singh and executed a power of attorney in
favour of Jagveer Singh with regard to the land in khatedari of
Manjeet Singh S/o Khajan Singh. Learned counsel further submits
that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 09.06.2024 and all
the offences alleged against him are triable by the Magistrate.
Learned counsel further submits that the complainant is in actual
possession of land in question. Learned counsel also submits that
the trial of the case will take considerable time to conclude,
therefore, the accused-petitioner may be enlarged on bail.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor assisted by learned counsel
for the complainant has vehemently opposed the submissions
made by learned counsel for the accused-petitioner.
5. Learned counsel for the complainant submits that
maximum number of the prosecution witnesses are still to be
examined by the learned trial Court.
6. Heard.
7. Considered the submissions made at bar so also
perused the material made available on record.
8. The Hon'ble Apex Court in case of Manish Kumar Vs.
The State of Rajasthan, Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.)
No.10185/2024 decided on 11.11.2024 has observed as
under:-
"The petitioner is an accused in a
case bearing FIR No.204/2024 registered
with Police Station Nayi Mandi, Hindon City,
District Karauli, Rajasthan for the offences
punishable under Sections 420 & 406
(Section 120 added in the charge sheet) of
(Downloaded on 29/07/2025 at 09:48:17 PM)
[2025:RJ-JP:27465] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-8330/2025]
the Indian Penal Code. The bail application
of the petitioner was dismissed by the High
Court. He has already undergone about 5
months in jail.
Heard learned counsel for the
petitioner and the respondent-State.
Considering the period of
incarceration of the petitioner and the
circumstances of the case, we are of the
opinion that a case of bail is made out for
the petitioner.
Accordingly, the petitioner is directed
to be released on bail forthwith on the
usual terms and conditions to be decided
by the concerned Court.”
9. Taking into consideration the totality of the fact and
circumstances of the case and so also the allegation against the
petitioner, more particularly the fact that the allegation against the
petitioner are triable by the Magistrate and he is in custody for
more than one year, this Court without expressing any opinion on
the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to
enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.
10. This third bail application is, accordingly, allowed and it
is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail
provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/-
(Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of
Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction
of the trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before
that Court or any other Court to which the matter is transferred,
on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to
do so.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J
ARTI SHARMA /35
(Downloaded on 29/07/2025 at 09:48:17 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
[ad_1]
Source link