Md. Kamruddin vs The State Of Bihar on 20 May, 2025

0
95

Patna High Court – Orders

Md. Kamruddin vs The State Of Bihar on 20 May, 2025

Author: Arun Kumar Jha

Bench: Arun Kumar Jha

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32026 of 2025
                         Arising Out of PS. Case No.-163 Year-2016 Thana- PALASI District- Araria
                 ======================================================
           1.     Md. Kamruddin S/o- Late Domar Ali Resident of village- Shyampur Police
                  station-Palasi District- Araria
           2.    Md. Jamal S/o- Late Domar Ali Resident of village- Shyampur Police
                 station-Palasi District- Araria
           3.    Md. Satabul S/o- Late Domar Ali Resident of village- Shyampur Police
                 station-Palasi District- Araria
           4.    Md. Abusama S/o- Md. Satabul Resident of village- Shyampur Police
                 station-Palasi District- Araria
           5.    Md. Sufiyan S/o- Md. Satabul Resident of village- Shyampur Police station-
                 Palasi District- Araria
           6.    Md. Ajrul S/o- Md. Kamruddin Resident of village- Shyampur Police
                 station-Palasi District- Araria
           7.    Md. Tahmir @ Tanvir S/o- Gulam Rasool Resident of village- Shyampur
                 Police station-Palasi District- Araria
           8.    Md. Saiyyam S/o- Late Jabul Resident of village- Shyampur Police station-
                 Palasi District- Araria
           9.    Md. Samim S/o- Late Jabul Resident of village- Shyampur Police station-
                 Palasi District- Araria
           10. Md. Tajmul S/o- Late Kare Resident of village- Shyampur Police station-
               Palasi District- Araria

                                                                                     ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr.Mukesh Kumar Rana, Adv.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr.Binod Kumar, A.P.P.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   20-05-2025

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

A.P.P. for the State.

02. In the present case, the petitioners are apprehending

their arrest in connection with Palasi P.S. Case No. 163 of 2016
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32026 of 2025(2) dt.20-05-2025
2/4

registered for the alleged offences under Section 341, 323, 325,

504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

03. As per prosecution case, petitioners and other co-

accused persons who were armed with lathi and farsa stopped the

informant and his family members and hurled abuses and said that

the they were involved in conduct of wrong panchayati. Thereafter

the petitioners assaulted the informant and petitioner no. 1 gave a

farsa blow to the informant on his head. Petitioner no. 7 struck

him with lathi causing fracture of the hand. The brother of the

informant who came for his rescue was assaulted by petitioner no.

3. The family members of the informant were also assaulted and

the assailants took away Rs. 4700/- from the informant, ornaments

from the neck of the wife of the informant and Rs. 1000/- from the

son of the informant.

04. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the

petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this

case. No occurrence as alleged as ever taken place. The FIR was

lodged after delay of four days for which there was no

explanation. The injury report shows only one sharp cut injury on

the victims but the said injury is caused by hard, blunt, sharp

cutting object and there is only one such injury on the person of

the victims. The dimension of the sharp cut injury shows it is a

superficial injury as size has been mentioned as 5″x1/4″x1/4″.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32026 of 2025(2) dt.20-05-2025
3/4

Learned counsel further submits that there was no intention to

cause death and there was no repetition of blow. The matter has

been compromised by the parties and compromise petition was

filed on 26.04.2025. The petitioners have got clean and fair

antecedent.

05. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the submission

made on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioners. Learned

A.P.P. submits that there is specific allegation against all the

petitioners for causing injuries to the informant and his family

members.

06. Having regard to the facts and circumstances and

submission made on behalf of the parties and considering the

superficial and non-serious nature of injuries and possibility of

false implication, let the petitioners above named, in the event of

their arrest or surrender before the court concerned within a period

of eight weeks from today, be released on bail, on furnishing bail

bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) each with two

sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court

of J.M.F.C., Araria in connection with Palasi P.S. Case No. 163 of

2016, subject to the condition laid down under Section 482(2) of

the B.N.S.S and other following conditions:

(i) One of the bailors will be a

close relative of the petitioners.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32026 of 2025(2) dt.20-05-2025
4/4

(ii) The petitioners will remain

present on each and every date

fixed by the court below, if so

required by the learned trial

court.

(Arun Kumar Jha, J)
Anuradha/-

U      T
 

[ad_1]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here