Md. Kurban Khan @ Kurban Khan vs The State Of Jharkhand on 20 June, 2025

0
7

Jharkhand High Court

Md. Kurban Khan @ Kurban Khan vs The State Of Jharkhand on 20 June, 2025

Author: Ananda Sen

Bench: Ananda Sen

                                                               2025:JHHC:16219


              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
                           A.B.A. No.3289 of 2024
                                     ------
     Md. Kurban Khan @ Kurban Khan, S/o Isak Khan, R/o Village
     Bahera, P.O. Loharsi, P.S. Piparatand, District Palamau.
                                                          ... ... Petitioner
                                     Versus
     1. The State of Jharkhand.
     2. Mohammad Ahmad Raza, S/o Karmuddin Miyan, R/o Village
         Bidra, P.O. Loharsi, P.S. Pipratand, District Palamau.
                                                 ... ... Opposite Parties
                                     ------
                      CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J.

——

     For the Petitioner(s)    :   Mr. Baban Prasad, Advocate
     For the State            :   Mrs. Ruby Pandey, A.P.P.
                                      -----


14/ 20.06.2025

                   Heard the parties.

2. This anticipatory bail application under Section 438 and

440 of the Cr.P.C., has been preferred by the petitioner

apprehending his arrest for offence under Sections 420, 406, 506

and 34 IPC.

3. Learned A.P.P. representing the State opposes the

prayer for anticipatory bail.

4. Notice under Section 35(3) of the BNSS has been issued

to the petitioner. The petitioner has filed an affidavit stating therein

that he has appeared before the police but he has not been

arrested. He undertakes to cooperate in the investigation.

5. Issuance of Notice under Section 35(3) of the BNSS

suggests that the police does not feel it necessary to arrest the

petitioner.

6. Since the petitioner has appeared before the Police /

Investigating Officer and is cooperating in the investigation, I am

inclined to grant anticipatory bail to this petitioner.

1

2025:JHHC:16219

7. If the petitioner does not cooperate with the

investigation in future, it will be open to the Court concerned to

cancel the bail of the petitioner.

8. With the aforesaid observation, this Anticipatory Bail

Application stands allowed. The petitioner, above named, is

directed to surrender before the learned court below within four

weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order and on the

event of his surrender or arrest, he shall be released on bail on

furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand), with

two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned

Judicial Magistrate, Palamau at Daltonganj, in connection with

Pipratand P.S. Case No.38 of 2023, subject to the condition that

one of the bailers should be a close relative of the petitioner and

other should be a resident of State of Jharkhand, having sufficient

landed property in his name or in the name of his ancestors in

which he is having share and to that effect, he has to file an

affidavit before the Trial Court indicating his share in the property.

(ANANDA SEN, J.)

Prashant. Cp-3

2



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here