Meera Kumari vs Mithilesh Kumar on 6 August, 2025

0
1


. Their marriage was an ideal marriage without

any dowry. After Bidagiri, the appellant went to the house

of the respondent and started living happy conjugal life with

the respondent for about 6 months and thereafter, her

behaviour became gradually changed and appellant-wife

started pressurizing the respondent-husband to live

separately from their parents. A female-child namely Aditi

was born out of the wedlock. The appellant-wife regularly

pressurized and started insisting to go to Naihar (mother’s

place) and talking full day on mobile with unknown person.

The appellant started misbehaving with the parents of the

respondent. It is further stated that respondent came to

know that appellant-wife has illicit relationship with

unknown person, who resides at her Maike village and

when he inquired from his wife(appellant), she became

agreesive and threatened to implicate him in a false case.

The appellant-wife has lodged Dalsingh Sarai P.S. Case No.

22 of 2018 under Sections 498(A) and other allied Sections

of the Indian Penal Code against the respondent and other
Patna High Court MA No.537 of 2023 dt.06-08-2025

in-laws family members for a false allegation of demand of

dowry and torture but in spite of that, respondent-husband is

ready to keep her as wife with full dignity and honour but it

was the appellant who does not want to live with the

respondent.



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here