[ad_1]
SLP(CRL) NOS. 17132/2024, 4118/25 AND 5819/2025
1. Leave granted.
2. Heard Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, learned senior
counsel for the appellant (in SLP(Crl) No.17132/2024),
Shri Vikram Chaudhri, learned senior counsel for the
appellant (in SLP(Crl) No.5819/2025), Mr. Karl P.
Rustomkhan, learned counsel for the appellant (in
SLP(Crl) No. 4118/2025) and Ms. Rukhmini Bobde, learned
counsel appearing for the respondent/State in all these
matters, at length.
3. The question that we are called upon for
consideration in the present proceedings is: whether in
each and every case, even arising out of an offence
under Indian Penal Code, would it be necessary to
furnish grounds of arrest to an accused either before
arrest or forthwith after arrest. Another question that
this Court is required to consider is: whether, even in
exceptional cases, where on account of certain
exigencies it will not be possible to furnish the
grounds of arrest either before arrest or immediately
after arrest, the arrest would be vitiated on the ground
of non-compliance with the provisions of Section 50 of
the Code of Criminal Procedure.
[ad_2]
Source link