[ad_1]
Andhra Pradesh High Court – Amravati
Mohammad Tanveer Ahmed, vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh, on 27 June, 2025
'=~ Lit_ee=-=ap
lN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATl
FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JUNE gr
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE 7
:PRESENT:
7HEfi ONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY``*`\
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4398 OF 2025 /
Between :
Mohammad Tanveer Ahmed, S/o. Mohammed Manner Ahmed, aged 39
years, R/o Flat No.604, Royal Apartment, SA Colony, Tolichowki,
Hyderabad, Telangana
...Petitioner/Accused No.4
AND
The State of Andhra Pradesh, Regiv its Public Prosecutor High Court of
Andhra Pradesh, at Amaravati.
...Respondent/Complainant
Petition under Sectio`ns 437 & 439 of Cr.P.C & Under Section 480 & 483
of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the memorandum of
grounds fl’led in support of the criminal petition, the High Court may be
pleased to release the Petitioner who was arrayed as Accused No 4 on bail in
connection with Crime No. 382 of 2024 dated 05.10.2024 on the fl’le of
Kancharapalem Police Station, Visakhapatnam Commissionerate,5
Visakhapatnam Dl-strict for offences leveled against the petitioners under
),131,127(2), 351(2), 61(2) BNS 67-A, ITA-2000-I
2Soeoc::n 109,%ir318(4
/I
The Petl’tI-On COmI-ng On for hearing, upon PeruSI’ng the Petl-lion and thet
?
amr: I;reanntsd UOT so: I g:OuuDn:i#:e#RnA:u:PMOBriA:i:rAedO:oacna:e :oPrO:h eh epaer::I:o ntehr:I
and of PUBLIC PROSECUTOR3 for the Respondent, the Court made the`
following
Between :
Mohammad Tanveer Ahmed, .HPETITIONER/ACCUSED
AND
The State Of Andhra …RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
Pradesh
counsel for the Petitioner/accused:
1. SUDHAKARA RAO AMBATI
Counsel for the Respondent/complainant:
1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
The Court Made the Following Order:I
This Criminal Petition, under Sections 480 and 483 of the
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, has been filed by
the petitioner/A4, seeking regular bail, in Crime No.382 of 2024
df Kancharapalem Police Station,- registered for the offencespunishable under Sections 109, 308(5), 318(4), 131,127(2),
351 (2) and 61 (2) of the BNS and Section 67-A of the lT Act.
2. Case of the prosecution, in brief, ‘ls that, on 05.10.2024,
the defacto complainan{ filed a `report before the police stating
that he is a resident of Adreddipalem, Sabbavaram, Anakapalli
and he had been running a Coffee Shop a{ VIsalakshi Nagar,
Visakhapatnam for the last two years in the name of WABI ART
CAFE. About six months prior to the occurrence of the offence,
Al visited his shop along with her friend Udaya (Navya) and
introduced herself as Digital Marketer and then told that they
I
would help h,’m f|n development of coffee shop. on one day, Al
requested the defacto complalnant to drIVe the Car, on the way
\\`
Al sprayed somethI’ng on h,’s face and shoulders, for whl’ch s\\ –
when he questI-Oned,
I_.__wvl,."
she told fhaf I-+ `^,^^ -
sJIe told that I-I was a
I
body mI|St. \
i\
'\
Th e reafter, thh.:mdhe:a^:,1o_ =?mplaITant felt draws; a:nd u:eu :ns::I:SeTd
her to drop h,-m back on HIS Cake house. After a few days, Al
jnvl’ted him to her house sltuated at NGGOJs colony for dl’nner.
She offered ennr1-… .:_ _ / __I `+||IIIGl
:::duel:ae::oa
the defacto csoommn:ajlu:I==+af:: :n_=isted
comp’alnant fe” drowsy andh’lm
hetowoke
drink lt.
upI T-her”i-i;:Gelr,
on the next
day mornl’ng at her house. on that day, Al had shown some
imI’tate photos jn her mobJ’e, and on seelng them he was
shocked and questl’oned about the photos, but she skipped the
topl’c Thereafter, Al demanded hlm to glve dl’vorce to hls wl-fe
and also to brlng hl’s motherJs JeWellary a`hd cash and further she
locked him l’n room for two days and further threatened the
defacto complajnant to br,ng gold and cash and she also Invited
her frlends to hostage hlm and demand money from hIS Parents
As the defacto complalnan[ refused AIJs proposal, she broke a
glass bottle and attacked him to klll WhJIe, she was ln phone
conversa[I’On wJth a boy, the defac{o complalnant ran away from
her home on 29.07.2024.
3. Heard. perusedtherecord.
4. Learned counsel for the petltJOner submltS that excep”he
confessIOna’ statement of co-accused, no other maten’al l’s
collected showlng the compltclty of the petjtIOner ln the present
crlme. He further subm,Its that the confessl’onal statement ,s not
admlsslb’e evldence and the petl{JOner here,n has been
langulshlng ln Ja” for more than 200 days He further submlts
that l’n order to overcome the statutory perl-od, the police filed
preljmI’nary charge sheet and as of now fl’nal charge sheet js not
yet fI-led.
5. on the other hand, learned Assistant public Prosecutor
submits that jn the present case, the pe{l-tjoner and his wife are
alleged to have done Honey Trap and extorted monl’es from the
victims. He further subml-ts that the laptops and other material
belonging to the petit,’oner herel-n were sent for analysis.
6. In view of the aforesal|d facts and circumstances of the
case and considering the remand perI-Od Of the Petl’tI’Oner, thI-S
court js I’nCIjned to grant bail to the petitl-oner/A4 on the following
COndI-lions.
i) The petitioner/A4 shall be released on ba” on hI-S
execut[-ng personal bond for Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five
Thousand only) wI’th two Suretl-eS Of the ll’ke sum each to the
satl-sfactf-on of the learned vH Addjtl-onal Judjcl-aI Magistrate ofFl-rst class, visakhapatnam.
Ii) On release, the petI’tiOner Shall appear before the
station House offI-Cer concerned, every day, between 10.00 AM
and 1.00 PM, till fI’ljng of the charge sheet.
ill) The petitioner shall co-operate with the
investigation.
7. AccordI’ngly, the Criml’nal petition ,-s allowed.
__–_—LJ&-_—–_- .——-_ —
sD/-K. KASIRAO ACHAR!
//TRUE COPY//
ASSIST A%FGISTRAR
Fol
To,
SECTION
\+-\-| OFFICER
|-` – _ —_ _
1. The VII AddI-tiOnaI Judicial Magistrate of FI-rSt class at VI-Sakhapatnam,
Visakhapatnam DI-Strict
2. The Superintendent, central prI-son, Vjsakhapatnam.
3. The statI’On House offl-cer, Kancharapalem Police station,
Visakhapatnam Distrl-ct
4. One CC to SRI. SUDHAKARA RAO AMBATI Advocate [opuc]
5. Two CCs to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court of Andhra pradesh
[OUT]
6a One spare copy
PSR
SRK,J
DATED :27/06/2025
BAIL ORDER
CRLP.No.4398 of 2025
-Ail i-==.`+_
PRERE _±
`:giv},ftk a *~gr;ng
ALLOWED
‘5 8 buN ‘ZtlZ5
x=[55=rw
i.`L S€_ _ie-
[ad_2]
Source link