Mohammed Siyab vs The State Of Karnataka on 16 January, 2025

0
209

Karnataka High Court

Mohammed Siyab vs The State Of Karnataka on 16 January, 2025

Author: S Vishwajith Shetty

Bench: S Vishwajith Shetty

                                                -1-
                                                              NC: 2025:KHC:1687
                                                        CRL.P No. 12786 of 2024




                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                          DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025

                                               BEFORE
                      THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY
                    CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 12786 OF 2024 (439(Cr.PC) /
                                          483(BNSS))
                   BETWEEN:

                   SIAB @MOHAMMED SIYAB, S/O SALIKA,
                   AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS,
                   R/AT. H NO.1-24/A MUBARAK MANZIL,
                   NEAR RAILWAY BRIDGE NAVUNDA,
                   UDUPI DISTRICT-576224.

                                                                  ...PETITIONER
                   (BY SRI DINESHKUMAR RAO K., ADVOCATE)

                   AND:

                   THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
                   BY UDUPI TOWN PS
                   UDUPI DISTRICT,
Digitally signed   UDUPI-574101.
by SHILPA R
TENIHALLI                                                        ...RESPONDENT
Location: HIGH     (BY SRI M.R. PATIL, HCGP)
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
                         THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.439 (FILED U/S.483 BNSS)
                   CR.P.C PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN
                   CRIME NO.100/2024 OF UDUPI TOWN POLICE STATION, UDUPI
                   PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE
                   (Jr.Dn.) AND JMFC COURT, UDUPI IN C.C.NO.3384/2024
                   (CHARGE SHEETED FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER
                   SECTIONS 143, 147, 148, 341, 324, 307, 212 R/W SEC.149 OF
                   IPC AND U/S.3, 25(1B) OF ARMS ACT 1959.

                       THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
                   ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
                                -2-
                                                NC: 2025:KHC:1687
                                        CRL.P No. 12786 of 2024




CORAM:    HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY


                          ORAL ORDER

1. Accused No.5 in Crime No.100/2024 registered by

Udupi Town Police Station for the offences punishable

Sections 143, 147, 148, 341, 324, 307, 212 read with

Section 149 of IPC and under Sections 3, 25(1B) of Arms

Act, 1959 is before this Court under Section 439 of Cr.P.C.,

seeking regular bail.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

3. FIR in Crime No.100/2024 was registered by

Udupi Town Police Station, for the aforesaid offences against

Sri. Mohammed Ashiq and five others on the basis of the first

information dated 26.05.2024, received from Sri.

Mohammed Sharif. The investigation in the case is completed

and the charge-sheet has been filed against eight persons for

the aforesaid offences. The petitioner is arraigned as accused

No.5 in the charge-sheet. The bail application filed by the

petitioner before the Jurisdictional Court in Crl. Misc.
-3-

NC: 2025:KHC:1687
CRL.P No. 12786 of 2024

No.330/2024 was rejected on 30.10.2024. Therefore, the

petitioner is before this Court.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that,

the petitioner is in custody for the last more than three

months. The investigation is completed. The allegation of

assaulting the first informant and other injured victims is

only as against accused Nos.1 and 3. There is no specific

overt act as against the petitioner. Accordingly, he prays to

allow the petition.

5. Per contra, learned High Court Government

Pleader has opposed the petition. He submits that, the

petitioner is a person with criminal antecedents and there

are as many as 15 criminal cases pending against him. In

the event he is enlarged on bail, he is likely to tamper with

the prosecution witnesses and also indulge in committing

similar offences. Accordingly, he prays to dismiss the

petition.

6. A perusal of the first information as well as the

charge-sheet filed in the present case would go to show that,
-4-
NC: 2025:KHC:1687
CRL.P No. 12786 of 2024

the first informant and accused No.1 were friends and

subsequently there was a ill-will between them since the

accused No.1 suspected that, the first informant and his

friends i.e. C.W.4 and C.W.5 had given information to the

police about his whereabouts in a criminal case in which he

was earlier arrested. It is in this background, on 21.04.2024,

they had fought with each other. As per FIR and the charge-

sheet, on 18.05.2024, after the first informant and his

friends had received information that accused No.1 was at

Manipal, they were on their way to Manipal to inform the

police about his whereabouts. While the first informant and

his friends were traveling in a car bearing registration No.KA-

13/M-5819, the accused persons who came in a car bearing

registration No.KA-13/N-3734 from the opposite side,

dashed their car against the car in which the first informant

and his friends were traveling and thereafter the inmates

from both the cars got down and accused No.3 allegedly

assaulted the first informant with the Talwar on his head and

leg, and the Juvenile accused who was along with him had

assaulted C.W.4. The accused No.1 who was driving the car
-5-
NC: 2025:KHC:1687
CRL.P No. 12786 of 2024

allegedly dashed the car in which the first informant and his

friends were traveling. In the said incident, the first

informant (C.W.1) had allegedly sustained grievous injuries.

Though the incident in question had taken place on

18.05.2024, the first information is belatedly submitted on

26.05.2024. Undisputedly, there is a ill-will between both the

parties. Even as per the charge-sheet allegations, only the

accused No.3 and Juvenile accused had assaulted the first

informant and C.W.4. There is no allegation as against the

petitioner herein about assaulting anyone of the victims in

the present case. Merely for the reason that, there are other

criminal cases pending against the accused, his bail

application cannot be rejected if he is otherwise found

entitled to the relief as sought for in the petition. The

apprehension expressed by the learned High Court

Government Pleader can be taken care of by imposing

appropriate conditions on the petitioner. Accordingly, the

following order:

ORDER

The petition is allowed.

-6-

NC: 2025:KHC:1687
CRL.P No. 12786 of 2024

The petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in

Crime No.100/2024 of Udupi Town Police Station, registered

for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148,

324, 341, 307, 212 read with Section 149 of IPC in

C.C.No.3384/2024 on the file of the Principal JMFC Court,

Udupi, subject to the following conditions:

a) The petitioner shall execute personal bond for a
sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties for the
likesum, to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional
Court;

b) The petitioner shall mark his attendance on every
Saturday between 10.00 a.m. and 1.00 p.m.
before the Station House Officer of Udupi Town
Police Station, till the present case registered
against him is disposed of.

c) The petitioner shall appear regularly on all the
dates of hearing before the Trial Court unless the
Trial Court exempts his appearance for valid
reasons;

d) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly
threaten or tamper with the prosecution witnesses;

e) The petitioner shall not involve in similar offences
in future;

-7-

NC: 2025:KHC:1687
CRL.P No. 12786 of 2024

f) The petitioner shall not leave the jurisdiction of the
Trial Court without permission of the said Court
until the case registered against him is disposed
off.

Sd/-

(S VISHWAJITH SHETTY)
JUDGE

SVH
List No.: 19 Sl No.: 9
CT:PK

[ad_1]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here