[ad_1]
[WA Nos.1429/2025, 1310/2025, 1426/2025, 1428/2025]
Raja Vijayaraghavan, J.
These appeals have been preferred challenging the common judgment rendered
by the learned Single Judge in W.P. (Crl.) Nos. 595 of 2024, 601 of 2024, 731 of 2024,
and 721 of 2024, whereby the said Writ Petitions were dismissed as non-maintainable
on the ground that the petitioners had failed to exhaust the statutory remedies
available under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to
as “the Act”). However, liberty was reserved to the appellants/petitioners to challenge
the impugned orders before the appropriate statutory authorities, and such authorities
were directed to consider the objections and claims raised by the petitioners,
untrammelled by the observations made in the impugned judgment. Being aggrieved
these appeals have been preferred.
[ad_2]
Source link