The case of petitioners is that they joined the
service of Respondent No.3 company through Respondent No. 4
provider of contract labourers, between 2008 and 2014. At the
time of their appointment, Respondent No. 4 assured that they
would soon be transferred to the rolls of Respondent No. 3 as
casual and permanent employees, however, despite several
Long-Term Settlements dated 17.08.2006, 20.04.2009,
16.10.2012, 05.10.2018 and 27.04.2022, whereunder other
contract workers were regularized as permanent employees of
Respondent No. 3, petitioners were not given the opportunity to
be considered or transferred. They state that they were in
continuous employment and did not receive proper notice or
explanation for this denial.
[ad_1]
Source link