Mr. Yamkhopao Touthang vs Shri Ramyo And 6 Others on 17 January, 2025

Manipur High Court

Mr. Yamkhopao Touthang vs Shri Ramyo And 6 Others on 17 January, 2025

SHAMURAILATPAM SUSHIL SHARMA Digitally signed by SHAMURAILATPAM SUSHIL SHARMA
                             Date: 2025.01.21 12:55:42 +05'30'                1


                                                                                           Item No. 29

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR
                                            AT IMPHAL
                            MC(CRP (C.R.P. Art. 227)) No. 23 of 2024
                                 Ref:- CRP (C.R.P. Art.227) No. 5 of 2020

                    Mr. Yamkhopao Touthang
                                                                               Applicant
                                                 Vs.

                    Shri Ramyo and 6 others
                                                                            Respondents

BEFORE
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. D. KRISHNAKUMAR

17.01.2025
Mr. D. Julius Riamei, learned counsel, appears for the applicant

and Mr. N. Ibotombi, learned senior counsel assisted by Ms. N. Savitri, learned

counsel, appears on for the respondents.

The present application has been filed on behalf of the applicant

praying as follows :

“In the premises as stated above, it is respectfully prayed
that your Lordships may be pleased to :

i. Condone the delay of 24 days in filing MC(CRP(CRP
Art. 227) No. 12 of 2024 for impleadment of the
Applicant as Legal Representative of the deceased
Petitioner No. 1 in CRP(Art.227) No. 5 of 2020/to set
aside abatement, if any;

ii. Pass any appropriate order or orders as deem fit by this
Hon’ble . ”

2

This Court has gone through the reasons given in the

application for condoning the delay in filing the connected MC(CRP(CRP Art.

227) No. 12 of 2024 for impleadment of the applicant as Legal Representative

of the deceased Petitioner No. 1 in CRP(Art.227) No. 5 of 2020 and this Court

has satisfied the reasons given in the application.

The learned senior counsel appearing for the respondents also

has made no serious objection in allowing the condonation application.

Therefore, considering the submissions made by the counsel

appearing for the parties and the reasons given in the application, the delay of

24 days in filing the MC(CRP(CRP Art. 227) No. 12 of 2024 is allowed.

The application is accordingly disposed of.

The Registry is directed to amend the cause title in CRP(Art.227)
No. 5 of 2020.

CHIEF JUSTICE

Sushil