Mrinal Kanti Bhattacharya vs The Kolkata Municipal Corporation And … on 19 June, 2025

0
8


Calcutta High Court

Mrinal Kanti Bhattacharya vs The Kolkata Municipal Corporation And … on 19 June, 2025

Author: Rajasekhar Mantha

Bench: Rajasekhar Mantha

OD-3

                                   ORDER SHEET
                          IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
                           CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                                   ORIGINAL SIDE



                                APOT/85/2025
                         IA NO:GA/1/2025; GA/2/2025
                         MRINAL KANTI BHATTACHARYA
                                    -VS-
                 THE KOLKATA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS




BEFORE:
The Hon'ble JUSTICE RAJASEKHAR MANTHA
And
The Hon'ble JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR GUPTA
Date: June 19, 2025.


                                    Mr. R. Chatterjee, Adv.; Mr. N.K. Das, Adv., appear.
                                Mr. B. Mukherjee, Adv.; Ms. S. Chatterjee, Adv., appear.



 1. The Court: GA/1/2025: Sufficient grounds are available explaining the delay of

       80 days in filing the appeal. The delay is condoned. GA/1/2025 is allowed and

       disposed of.

 2. The appellant is aggrieved by the order dated September 24, 2024, passed by a

       Single Bench of this Court.

 3. It appears from the impugned order that unauthorised construction has been

       noted by the KMC and a notice under section 401 of the Act has been issued.

 4. It further appears from the submissions made by the parties and the instructions

       of the counsel for the KMC that certain unauthorised work under the garb of
                                              2

   repairs, allegedly not requiring the permission of the KMC        under rule 3 sub-

   clause (ii) of the KMC (Building) Rules, has been carried out.

5. Some portions have been demolished by the private respondent. Even after such

demolition, the KMC noticed further unauthorised construction. This is evident

from the instructions of the KMC addressed to the counsel, dated June 18, 2025,

which is kept on record.

6. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the private respondent has

constructed an additional floor in the building and has also created a shaft for

the purpose of installation of a lift.

7. There are other deviations and unauthorised constructions made in the said

building that may affect its stability.

8. Having regard to the above, this Court directs the DG (Building) of the KMC to

effect an inspection of the building forthwith and take immediate and urgent

steps under the Act in respect of any unauthorised threat. It is expected that the

inspection is conducted within a period of seven days from date.

9. The private respondent shall not carry out any repairs or construction in the

building without the express consent in writing of the DG(Building) and in

accordance with the KMC Act and the KMC (Building) Rules framed thereunder.

10. The Officer-in-Charge, Muchipara P.S. shall render all assistance to the KMC and

its officials, inter alia, for enforcing the order under section 401 of the Act and to

facilitate inspection and assist the KMC as and when required by their officials.

11. The DG(Building) of the KMC shall give notice to the appellant and conduct

inspection in the presence of the appellant as well as the private respondent with
3

prior notice to the Muchipara P.S. as also while undertaking any work and/or

responsibility under the Act and the Rules.

12. List this matter on July 17, 2025.

(RAJASEKHAR MANTHA, J.)

(AJAY KUMAR GUPTA, J.)
tk



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here