Mrunalini Mallick vs State Of Odisha And Others …. Opposite … on 5 April, 2025

0
2

05.04.2025

SASHIKANTA MISHRA, J.

All these writ applications involve identical facts

and being together, are disposed of by this common

judgment.

2. All these petitioners had applied for engagement as

Swechasevi Sikhya Sahayak (SSS) pursuant to

advertisement issued on 25.03.2003. Their names did

not figure in the merit list published on 31.07.2003 and

13.08.2003 for which they could not be engaged.

2.1 On 26.09.2003, as per instructions issued by the

Secretary to Government in the Department of School

and Mass Education, the District Collectors, prepared

list of eligible candidates for recruitment of 15682 SSS,

out of the pending applications received pursuant to the

advertisement dated 25.03.2003. The petitioners’ names

found place in the merit list and accordingly, they were

selected. Subsequently, engagement orders being

issued, all of them joined as Sikhya Sahayaks (SS) in

different schools.



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here