Mst. Hajira And Others vs Financial Commissioner(Revenue)/ on 3 January, 2025

0
67

Jammu & Kashmir High Court – Srinagar Bench

Mst. Hajira And Others vs Financial Commissioner(Revenue)/ on 3 January, 2025

Author: Moksha Khajuria Kazmi

Bench: Moksha Khajuria Kazmi

                                                                                       Serial No. 47
                                                                                 Supplementary Cause List


                                HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
                                               AT SRINAGAR
                                                     ...
                                               WP(C) No.42/2025


                    Mst. Hajira And Others
                                                                                 .........Petitioner(s)
                                                    Through:
                                          Mr. Shuja-ul-Haq Tantray, Advocate.

                                                     Versus

                    Financial Commissioner(Revenue)/
                    Commissioner Agararian Reforms and Others
                                                                                 ......Respondent(s)
                                                    Through:
                                              Mr. Satinder Singh Kala, AAG

                    CORAM:

                                HON'BLE MS JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, JUDGE

                                                         ORDER

03.01.2025

1. In the instant petition, the petitioners herein have challenged

order dated 09.05.2024, passed by Respondent No. 1 in

reference dated 23.01.2024 made by Additional Commissioner

with powers of Divisional Commissioner, Kashmir in Revision

Petitions filed by the petitioners against mutation orders No.

730 dated 01.10.2003 and 729 dated 01.10.2003.

2. It is sated by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the

learned Financial Commissioner has ignored the fact that the

mutations impugned were not in picture in the revision records

on the basis of the Customary Law but were attested on

fraudulently drawn Pedigree table wherein the names of the

Shaista Rashid Shah
I attest to the accuracy and
authenticity of this document
15.01.2025 14:14
petitioners were not reflected as legal heirs of deceased Ghulam

Qadir and Mst Khati.

3. Notice, waived by Mr. Satinder Singh Kalla, learned AAG

appearing on behalf of respondents 1 to 3. Notice shall also go

to Respondent No. 4.

4. Mr. Satinder Singh Kalla, learned AAG seeks and is granted

four weeks time for riling reply/response.

5. In the meanwhile, subject to objections and till next date of

hearing before the Bench, the parties to the lis are directed not

to create any third party interest.

6. List on 05.03.2024.

(MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI)
JUDGE
Srinagar
03.01.2025
“Shaista-PS”

Shaista Rashid Shah
I attest to the accuracy and
authenticity of this document
15.01.2025 14:14



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here