Mukesh Sepat @ Mukesh Kumar S/O Shri … vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jp:27095) on 21 July, 2025

0
22

Rajasthan High Court – Jaipur

Mukesh Sepat @ Mukesh Kumar S/O Shri … vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jp:27095) on 21 July, 2025

Author: Uma Shanker Vyas

Bench: Uma Shanker Vyas

[2025:RJ-JP:27095]

        HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                    BENCH AT JAIPUR

    S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3838/2025

Mukesh Sepat @ Mukesh Kumar S/o Shri Jeevan Ram, Aged
About 27 Years, R/o Mohan Ka Bas, Karansar, Police Station
Renwal, District Jaipur, At Present Tenant Plot No. 34, Bhomiya
Nagar, Vikash Nagar, Kalwar Road, Jaipur. Hingoniya, At Present
Bidash Nagar Extention, Jhotwara, Jaipur. (Presently Confined At
Central Jail, Jaipur)
                                                                      ----Petitioner
                                       Versus
State of Rajasthan, Through Pp
                                                                    ----Respondent

Connected With
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5077/2025
Mohan Saini S/o Babulal Saini, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Village
Maliwada, Via Kalwar, Jaipur, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In
Central Jail, Jaipur).

—-Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan, Through Pp

—-Respondent

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Shekhawat, Adv., with
Mr. Tejpal Rulaniya, Adv.

Mr. Mukesh Kumar Saini, Adv.

For Respondent(s) : Mr. R.S. Shekhawat, P.P.

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS
Judgment / Order
21/07/2025

These bail applications have been filed by petitioners under

Section 483 BNSS/439 Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail in FIR

No.118/2025 registered at Police Station Jhotwara, District Jaipur

(West) for the offence(s) under Section(s) 178, 179, 180, 318(4)

& 61(2)(A) of BNS.

(Downloaded on 22/07/2025 at 09:54:18 PM)

[2025:RJ-JP:27095] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-3838/2025]

Learned counsel for petitioners submit that accused-

petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in

these cases. Learned counsel further submit that charge sheet has

been filed. Learned counsel also submit that accused-petitioners

have been in judicial custody since long and the conclusion of the

trial will take long time, hence petitioners may be enlarged on

bail.

Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has

opposed these bail applications.

Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances

of these cases and the fact that charge sheet has been filed, but

without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of

these cases, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge

petitioners on bail.

Accordingly, these bail applications filed under Section 483

BNSS/439 Cr.P.C. are allowed and it is ordered that accused-

petitioners 1.Mukesh Sepat @ Mukesh Kumar S/o Shri

Jeevan Ram & 2.Mohan Saini S/o Babulal Saini shall be

released on bail, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond

in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each

to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that

petitioners shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates

of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

A copy of this order be place in connected file.

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

DANISH USMANI /67 & 68

(Downloaded on 22/07/2025 at 09:54:18 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

[ad_1]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here