Narayanswamy vs Chandar M on 5 May, 2025

0
34

This case has arisen as a result of the

complainant filing a complaint against the accused

under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments

Act.

2. The relevant facts required to adjudicate

this case are as follows:

The accused and the complainant are known

to each other since 20 years and in the backdrop of

C.C.No.952/2023

this acquaintance, the accused borrowed a sum of

Rs.4 lakhs for the development of his Gym on

02.09.2022. The accused executed a promissory

note in favour of the complainant and also issued a

cheque bearing No.012763 dated 02.12.2022 for a

sum of Rs.4,00,000/- drawn on Union Bank of

India, Haines Road branch, Bangalore. In discharge

of the said legally recoverable debt. When the

cheque was presented for encashment it was

dishonoured for ‘Account Blocked”. Legal notice

dated 16.12.2022 was issued. Even after the expiry

of statutory period, the accused did not repaid the

amount. Therefore, invariably this complaint was

filed.

[ad_1]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here