Himachal Pradesh High Court
Naresh Kumar vs State Of H.P. on 23 July, 2025
Author: Tarlok Singh Chauhan
Bench: Tarlok Singh Chauhan
Naresh Kumar Vs State of H.P.
Cr.MMO No. 303 of 2025.
.
23.07.2025 Present: Mr. Y.P. Sood, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. H.R. Rawat, Mr. Tejasvi Sharma, Addl. Advocates
General with Mr. Ranjna Patial, Dy. Advocate General for
the respondent/State.
List on 28.07.2025, before the appropriate Bench.
July 23, 2025
(Pramod)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:29 :::CIS
M/s Sushil General Store Vs Roop Singh
Cr. Revision No. 293 of 2025.
.
23.07.2025 Present: Mr. Vivek Thakur, Advocate for the petitioner.
List on 28.07.2025, before the appropriate Bench.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 23, 2025 Judge
(Pramod)
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:29 :::CIS
Gurpreet Singh Vs State of H.P.
Cr. MP(M) No. 1751 of 2025.
.
23.07.2025 Present: Mr. Vijender Katoch, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. H.R. Rawat, Mr. Tejasvi Sharma, Addl. Advocates
General with Mr. Ranjna Patial, Dy. Advocate General for
the respondent/State.
List on 28.07.2025, before the appropriate Bench.
July 23, 2025
(Pramod)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:29 :::CIS
Rakesh Kumar Vs State of H.P.
Cr.MP(M) No. 1750 of 2025.
.
23.07.2025 Present: Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Suri, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. H.R. Rawat, Mr. Tejasvi Sharma, Addl. Advocates
General with Mr. Ranjna Patial, Dy. Advocate General for
the respondent/State.
List on 28.07.2025, before the appropriate Bench.
July 23, 2025
(Pramod)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:29 :::CIS
Arun Bhatti Vs State of H.P.
Cr.MP(M) No. 1748 of 2025.
.
23.07.2025 Present: Mr. Nand Lal Thakur, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. H.R. Rawat, Mr. Tejasvi Sharma, Addl. Advocates
General with Mr. Ranjna Patial, Dy. Advocate General for
the respondent/State.
List on 28.07.2025, before the appropriate Bench.
July 23, 2025
(Pramod)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:29 :::CIS
Khub Ram Vs State of H.P.
Cr. MP(M) No. 1744 of 2025.
.
23.07.2025 Present: Mr. Shamul Kaushal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. H.R. Rawat, Mr. Tejasvi Sharma, Addl. Advocates
General with Mr. Ranjna Patial, Dy. Advocate General for
the respondent/State.
List on 28.07.2025, before the appropriate Bench.
July 23, 2025
(Pramod)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:29 :::CIS
Sameer Sapra Vs State of H.P.
CRMPM No. 1742 of 2025.
.
23.07.2025 Present: Mr. Shakti Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. H.R. Rawat, Mr. Tejasvi Sharma, Addl. Advocates
General with Mr. Ranjna Patial, Dy. Advocate General for
the respondent/State.
List on 28.07.2025, before the appropriate Bench.
July 23, 2025
(Pramod)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:29 :::CIS
Ravinder Kumar Gupta Vs Devinder Kumar Sharma
CMPMO No. 731 of 2024.
.
23.07.2025 Present: Mr. Deepak Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. K.R. Thakur, Advocate for the respondent.
At the request of learned Counsel for the petitioner, list the
matter after four weeks.
July 23, 2025
(Pramod)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:29 :::CIS
Ruchi Maggo & anr. Vs Balraj Maggo & Ors.
CMPMO No. 01 of 2025.
.
23.07.2025 Present: Mr. Jeevesh Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Sumit Sharma, Advocate for the respondents.
At the request of learned Counsel for the petitioner, list the
matter after four weeks.
July 23, 2025
(Pramod)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:29 :::CIS
Smt. Kiran Verma and anr. Vs Vijender Gupta
RSA No. 20 of 2025.
.
23.07.2025 Present: Mr. G.D. Verma, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sumit Sharma,
Advocate for the appellants.
Mr. N.K. Bhalla, Advocate for the respondent through
video conferencing.
Further time prayed to inspect the record. List after six
weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 23, 2025
(Pramod)
r Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:29 :::CIS
Smt. Kiran Verma Vs. Vijender Gupta
RSA No. 18 of 2025.
.
23.07.2025 Present: Mr. G.D. Verma, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sumit Sharma,
Advocate for the appellants.
Mr. N.K. Bhalla, Advocate for the respondent through
video conferencing.
Further time prayed to inspect the record. List after six
weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 23, 2025
(Pramod)
r Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:29 :::CIS
Devmani Vs. State of H.P. and others
CMPMO No. 512 of 2024.
.
23.07.2025 Present: Mr. Sanjeev Kuthiala, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Abhishek
Kaistha, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. R.P. Singh, Deputy Advocate General for the
respondents/State.
At the request of learned Counsel appearing on behalf of
the petitioner, list after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 23, 2025
(Pramod)
r Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:29 :::CIS
Ramesh Chand Vs Dev Raj
Civil Revision No. 35 of 2025
.
23.07.2025 Present: Mr. B.C. Verma, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate for the respondent No. 1.
CMP No. 10103 of 2025
Reply if any be filed within two weeks.
CMP No. 17298 of 2025
Reply if any be filed within two weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 23, 2025 Judge
(Pramod)
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:29 :::CIS
Dinesh Kumar Vs Monika Rani
CMPMO No. 192 of 2025.
.
23.07.2025 Present: Mr. Atharv Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Gurinder Singh Parmar, Advocate for the respondent.
At the request of the learned Counsel for the petitioner, the
matter is adjourned. List after four weeks.
July 23, 2025
(Pramod)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:29 :::CIS
Narinder Thakur (deceased) through LRs Vs LAO, HPSEB and Ors.
CMPMO No. 205 of 2025.
.
23.07.2025 Present: Mr. Varun Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Sunita Sharma, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Sugandh
Verma, Advocate for respondents No. 1 and 2.
Mr. R.P. Singh, Dy. Advocate General for respondent No.
3.
Further time prayed to go through the record by the
learned Counsels appearing for the parties. List after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 23, 2025 Judge
(Pramod)
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:29 :::CIS
Arvind Singh Vs Sandeep Kaur & Ors.
CMPMO No. 406 of 2025.
.
23.07.2025 Present: Mr. H.S. Rana, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Arjun Lal, Advocate for the respondents.
In view of the law laid down by Hon’ble Apex Court passed
in “Shaurabh Kumar Tripathi Vs. Vidhi Rawal” Criminal Appeal No.
2688 of 2025 decided on 19 th May, 2025, the present application is not
maintainable. Hence, dismissed.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 23, 2025 Judge
(Pramod)
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:29 :::CIS
Preeti Dhiman Vs Sandeep Chauhan and Ors.
CMPMO No. 214 of 2023.
.
23.07.2025 Present: Ms. Vandana Misra, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Vinod Kumar, Advocate vice Mr. Jagmohan Singh
Chandel, Advocate for respondent No. 1.
Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent
No. 1 submits that learned Senior Counsel is not available today on
account of personal difficulty and seeks adjournment. List after four
weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 23, 2025 Judge
(Pramod)
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:29 :::CIS
Sameer Sapra Vs State of H.P.
Cr. MP(M) No. 1742 of 2025.
.
23.07.2025 Present: Mr. H.S. Rawat and Mr. Tejasvi Sharma, Addl. Advocates
General with Ms. Ranjna Patial, Dy. Advocate General for
appellant/State.
Mr. Suraj Kumar Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Tarun K.
Sharma, Advocate for the respondent.
List on 12.08.2025, before the appropriate Bench.
July 23, 2025
(Pramod)
to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:29 :::CIS
Rakesh Kumar Sharma Vs State Bank of India
Cr. MMO No. 673 of 2025.
.
23.07.2025 Present: Ms. Madhurika Sekhon Verma, Advocate for the petitioner.
List on 12.08.2025, before the appropriate Bench.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 23, 2025 Judge
(Pramod)
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:29 :::CIS
State of H.P. Vs Vijay Kumar
Cr. Appeal No. 366 of 2011.
.
23.07.2025 Present: Mr. H.S. Rawat and Mr. Tejasvi Sharma, Addl. Advocates
General with Ms. Ranjna Patial, Dy. Advocate General for
appellant/State.
Mr. Suraj Kumar Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Tarun K.
Sharma, Advocate for the respondent.
List on 12.08.2025, before the appropriate Bench.
July 23, 2025
(Pramod)
to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:29 :::CIS
Rajmal Vs State of H.P.
Cr. MMO No. 948 of 2024.
.
23.07.2025 Present: Mr. Bhupinder Singh Ahuja, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. H.S. Rawat and Mr. Tejasvi Sharma, Addl. Advocates
General with Ms. Ranjna Patial, Dy. Advocate General for
respondent.
List on 12.08.2025, before the appropriate Bench.
July 23, 2025
(Pramod) to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:29 :::CIS
Tholu Ram (deceased) through LRs Vs Raghupreet Hydro Power
Projects Pvt. Ltd.
CMP(M) No. 1254 of 2025
.
23.07.2025 Present: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sharma, Advocate for the applicant.
CMP No. 17068 of 2025
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is
allowed. The delay in re-filing the appeal, is condoned. The
application stands disposed of.
CMP(M) No. 1254 of 2025
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the
respondents, returnable within four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 23, 2025 Judge
(Pramod)
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:29 :::CIS
HPPCL & anr. Vs Shamsher Singh & ors.
CMP Nos. 10565, 10566, 10568, 10569, 13943,
13944 of 2025 in RFA No. 151 of 2018.
.
23.07.2025 Present: Mr. Digvinay Singh Kanwar, Advocate vice Mr. Yashveer
Singh Rathore, Advocate for the appellants.
Mr. B.M. Chauhan, Sr. Advocate for respondents No. 1 to 3,
4(a) to 4(c), 5, 6(e), 6(f), 7(a) to 7(e), 8 to 10, 12 to 19, 20(a),
20(b), 21, 22, 24, 26 to 29 and proposed legal
representatives of deceased respondent No. 23.
Name of respondent No. 25 stands deleted.
Mr. Surya Chauhan, Advocate for respondent No. 30.
CMP Nos. 10565, 10566, 10568, 10569, 13943, 13944 of
2025.
Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants
submits that an appropriate application has been filed wherein
details of payment to be released in favour of the respondents
and amount to be refunded to the appellants have been detailed.
However, the same is not on record. Learned Counsel appearing
on behalf of the respondents submits that they have received the
copy of the same. If in order, let the same be placed on record.
List after 10 days.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 23, 2025 Judge
(Pramod)
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:29 :::CIS
Himmat Ram Vs Savita Devi & ors.
RSA No. 138 of 2023
.
23.07.2025 Present: Mr. Naveen K. Bhardwaj, Advocate for the appellant.
Mr. M.C. Bhardwaj, Advocate vice Mr. Devender K. Sharma,
Advocate for respondent No. 1.
Respondent No. 6 present in person.
CMP No. 16522 of 2025.
The present application has been filed for effecting
substituted service of respondents No. 2 to 5. In so far as
respondent No. 2, 3 and 5 are concerned, vide order dated
20.06.2025 passed by Additional Registrar (Judicial), they have
been proceeded ex-parte.
As per the report of service, respondent no. 4 has got
married and is residing in her in-laws house. Let correct address
of respondent no. 4 i.e. Rita along with process fees be filed
within two weeks and thereafter respondent no. 4 be served
through normal process returnable within four weeks.
Application stands disposed of.
RSA No. 138 of 2023
List after the service of respondent No. 4.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 23, 2025 Judge
(Pramod)
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:29 :::CIS
LAC & anr. Vs Lachhi Ram & anr.
RFA No. 62 of 2018
.
23.07.2025 Present: Mr. R.P. Singh, Dy. Advocate General for the appellants.
Ms. Veena Sharma, Advocate for the respondents.
CMP No. 17024 of 2025.
Reply/instructions, if any, be filed/obtained on or before the
next date of hearing. List after two weeks.
July 23, 2025
(Pramod)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:29 :::CIS
LAC & anr. Vs Kishori Lal & ors.
RFA No. 63 of 2018
.
23.07.2025 Present: Mr. R.P. Singh, Dy. Advocate General for the appellants.
Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Advocate for the respondents No. 1 to
4.
CMP No. 17027 of 2025.
Reply/instructions, if any, be filed/obtained on or before the
next date of hearing. List after two weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 23, 2025 Judge
(Pramod)
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:29 :::CIS
LAC & anr. Vs Kishori Lal & ors.
RFA No. 63 of 2018
.
23.07.2025 Present: Mr. R.P. Singh, Dy. Advocate General for the appellants.
Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Advocate for the respondents No. 1
to 4.
CMP No. 17027 of 2025.
——
CMP No. 17033 of 2025.
The applicants are exempted from filing the true typed
translation of Annexure A1 in question annexed with the CMP No.
17032 of 2025, at this stage, subject to filing of the same within
seven days, as and when directed to do so.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 23, 2025 Judge
(Pramod)
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:29 :::CIS
HPSEB Ltd. & Ors. Vs Gulat Ram (deceased) through LRs
RFA No. 223 of 2018
.
23.07.2025 Present: Ms. Sunita Sharma, Sr. Advocate and Mr. Dhananjay
Sharma, Advocate for appellants No. 1 and 3.
Mr. Hamender Singh Chandel, Advocate for appellant No.
2.
None for respondents No. 1(a) to 1(c), 2, 3, 5, 6(a) to 6(d),
7(a) to 7(f) and 8.
Mr. Abhishek Daulta, Advocate for the applicants in CMP
No. 11087 of 2024.
CMP No. 17032 of 2025.
Reply if any on behalf of non applicants/appellants be filed
within four weeks. List thereafter.
CMP No. 17033 of 2025.
The applicants are exempted from filing the true typed
translation of Annexure A1 in question annexed with the CMP No.
17032 of 2025, at this stage, subject to filing of the same within
seven days, as and when directed to do so.
Application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 23, 2025 Judge
(Pramod)
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:29 :::CIS
Dharam Pal & Ors. Vs LAC & Ors.
RFA No. 03 of 2024
.
23.07.2025 Present: Mr. Vikas Shyam, Advocate for the appellants.
Mr. R.P. Singh, Dy. Advocate General for respondents No. 1
to 3.
Mr. K.R. Kashyap and Ms. Vaishali Lakhanpal, Advocates for
respondent No. 4, 5(a) to 5(i).
CMP No. 17066 of 2025.
Since no case for early hearing of the matter is made out,
disposed of.
RFA No. 3 of 2024.
therefore, present application is dismissed. Application stands
List of hearing in due course.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 23, 2025 Judge
(Pramod)
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:29 :::CIS
LAC Vs Prem Singh
RFA No. 203 of 2017
.
23.07.2025 Present: Mr. R.P. Singh, Dy. Advocate General for the appellants.
Mr. Sunny Dhatwalia, Advocate for the respondent No. 1(a).
CMP No. 17046 of 2025.
Reply/instructions, if any, be filed/obtained on or before the
next date of hearing. List after two weeks.
CMP No. 17048 of 2025.
Reply/instructions, if any, be filed/obtained on or before the
next date of hearing. List after two weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 23, 2025 Judge
(Pramod)
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:29 :::CIS
Rakesh Sharma and Ors. Vs Bhushan Lal and Ors a/w
connected matter
RFA No. 272 of 2003 a/w
.
RFA No. 276 of 2003
23.07.2025 Present: Mr. Arun Kaushal, Advocate for the appellants in RFA No.
272 of 2003 and for respondent No. 5 in RFA No. 276 of
2003.
Mr. Sahil Dixit, Advocate for the appellants in RFA No. 276
of 2003 and for respondents No. 2(a) to 2(c) in RFA No. 272
of 2003.
Mr. Rahul Gathania, Advocate for respondent No. 1 in both
appeals.
None for respondent No. 4 in RFA No. 276 of 2003.
Respondent No. 3 in RFA No. 272 of 2003 is ex-parte.
Previously respondent no. 1 in both the appeals was duly
represented by learned Senior Counsel Sh. K.D. Sood. On
account of his demise, further time prayed on behalf of
respondent No. 1 in order to engage a Senior Counsel. Allowed.
List after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 23, 2025 Judge
(Pramod)
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:29 :::CIS
Devi Dutt Vs Keshwa Ram a/w connected matter
CR No. 170 of 2018 a/w RSA No. 348 of 2018.
.
23.07.2025 Present: Mr. Rakesh Thakur, Advocate for the petitioner in CR No.
170 of 2018 and for the appellant in RSA No. 348 of 2018.
Mr. Atharv Sharma, Advocate for the respondent(s) i n both
cases.
Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner
submits that learned Senior Counsel is not available today on
August, 2025.
r to
account of personal difficulty and seeks adjournment. List on 21 st
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 23, 2025 Judge
(Pramod)
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:29 :::CIS
Shivalaya Construction Co. Vs. Rajesh and Ors.
CMPMO No. 148 of 2019.
.
23.07.2025 Present: Ms. Dhanvanti, Advocate vice Mr. Sanjay Bhardwaj,
Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Malay Kaushal, Advocate for respondent No. 1.
Name of respondent No. 2 stands deleted vide order dated
20.07.2023.
Mr. Vishwash Kaushal, Advocate for respondents No. 3 to
5.
Mr. R.P. Negi, Dy. Advocates General for respondents No.
7 and 8/State.
Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and
respondents No. 3 to 5 submit that there is a possibility of
amicable settlement with respondent No. 1. Learned Counsel
appearing for the respondent No. 1 seeks time to have
instructions in this regard. List after two weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 23, 2025 Judge
(Pramod)
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:29 :::CIS
Kedar Singh Vs State of H.P. & Ors.
RSA No. 163 of 2025
.
23.07.2025 Present: Ms. Kamakshi Tarlokta, Advocate for the appellant.
Mr. R.P. Singh, Deputy Advocate General, for the
respondents.
RSA No. 163 of 2025
Notice. Mr. R.P. Singh, learned Deputy Advocate General,
appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the
respondents. Notice has been issued on substantial questions of
law framed at Page Nos. 11 to 13 of the paper book.
List for consideration after 12 weeks.
CMP No. 17009 of 2025
Since the certified copy of the trial Court judgment is on
record, hence, the present application has become infructuous.
The application stands disposed of accordingly.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 23, 2025 Judge
(Pramod)
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:29 :::CIS
Vishavjit (deceased) through LRs Vs LAO & anr.
RFA No. 56 of 2025
.
23.07.2025 Present: Mr. Atharv Sharma, Advocate for the appellant.
Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Senior Penal Counsel for the
Respondents.
Admit. Call for records.
List for hearing in due course.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 23, 2025 Judge
(Pramod)
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:29 :::CIS
Yog Raj Vs Shri Ram Transport Fin. Co. Ltd.
CMPMO No. 410 of 2025
.
23.07.2025 Present: Mr. H.S. Rangra, Advocate for the petitioner.
At the request of learned Counsel appearing on behalf of
the petitioner in order to enable him to prepare the case at hand,
list after one week.
July 23, 2025
(Pramod)
to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:29 :::CIS
Narender Kumar Vs Lata Kumari
CMPMO No. 411 of 2025
.
23.07.2025 Present: Mr. R.L. Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner.
At the request of learned Counsel appearing on behalf of
the petitioner in order to enable him to prepare the case at hand,
list after one week.
July 23, 2025
(Pramod)
to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:29 :::CIS
Amar Chand Vs Banarsi Dass & Ors.
RSA No. 356 of 2009.
.
23.07.2025 Present: Mr. Shekhar Badola, Advocate, vice Mr. Ramakant
Sharma, Advocate for the proposed LRs of deceased
appellant.
Mr. Surjeet Kumar, Advocate vice Mr. Anuj Gupta,
Advocate for respondents No. 3 to 5, 9 and 10.
Respondent No. 8 proceeded against ex parte vide order
dated 07.03.2025 of the Addl. Registrar (Judicial).
CMP(M) No. 1247 of 2025.
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicants. The non-applicants have no objection, if in case, the
application is allowed and the legal heirs of deceased appellant
are ordered to be brought on record.
Sole appellant is stated to have died on 25.03.2025. The
same is evident form the Death Certificate appended along-with
the application as Annexure MA-1. The details of the legal heirs
are given in Paragraph-2 of the application, which are in
consonance with the details given in the Legal Heir Certificate
appended along-with the application as Annexure MA-2.
The application is within limitation. In view of the
aforesaid, the present application is allowed. Legal heirs of
deceased appellant are ordered to be brought on record.
Amended memo of parties filed with the application is ordered to
be taken on record. Be placed at its appropriate place. Power of
attorney is stated to have been filed on behalf of legal heirs of
deceased appellant.
The application stands disposed of.
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:29 :::CIS
RSA No. 217 of 2010
.
Steps for service of respondents No. 6 and 7 be taken
within a week. List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 23, 2025 Judge
(Pramod)
r to
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:29 :::CIS
Harpal Singh (deceased) through LRs Vs Sachin
RSA No. 217 of 2010.
.
23.07.2025 Present: Mr. Pranjal Munjal, Advocate vice Mr. Janesh Gupta,
Advocate for the appellant.
Mr. Divya Raj Singh, Advocate for Respondent No. 1.
Legal heirs of deceased respondent No. 2 are present in
Court.
CMP(M) No. 838 of 2025.
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicants and the legal heirs of deceased respondent No. 2, who
are present in person.
Respondent No. 2 is stated to have died on 12.03.2025.
The same is evident form the Death Certificate appended along-
with the application as Annexure A-1. The details of the legal
heirs are given in Paragraph-2 of the application. The legal heirs
of deceased respondent No. 2 submit that there are no other
legal heirs of deceased respondent no. 2 other than them. The
right to sue survives in favour of legal heirs detailed in para no. 2
of the application. The application is within limitation. For the
aforesaid reasons, the application is allowed. Legal heirs of
deceased respondent no. 2 are ordered to be brought on record.
Amended memo of parties be filed within four weeks.
The application stands disposed of.
RSA No. 217 of 2010
Notice. Newly added respondents no. 2(a) to 2(d) appears
and waives service of notice. Power of attorney on their behalf be
filed within four weeks.
List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 23, 2025 Judge
(Pramod)
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:29 :::CIS
Bimla Devi and others Vs Kaushalya Devi (deceased)
and others
.
RSA No. 131 of 2014.
23.07.2025 Present: Mr. Dushyant Dadwal, Advocate for the appellants.
Mr. Atharv Sharma, Advocate for the respondents No. 2 to
7.
CMP(M) No. 701 of 2024.
Further time prayed for bringing on record the legal heirs
period of four weeks.
r to
of deceased proposed LR No. 1(c). Needful be done within a
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 23, 2025 Judge
(Pramod)
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:29 :::CIS
Ravinder Pal Singh vs. Pankaj Chandel
RSA No.191 of 2023
.
22.07.2025 Present: Mr. Sambhav Bhasin, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Het Ram Thakur, Advocate, for the respondent.
At the request of learned counsel for the respondent, list
after four weeks.
July 22, 2025 (KS)
to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:29 :::CIS
Jarnail Singh and others vs. Ramesh Chand
RSA No.62 of 2023
.
22.07.2025 Present: Mr. Ashok Kumar Tyagi, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Vinod Chauhan, Advocate, for the respondent.
At the request of learned counsel for the respondent, list
after two weeks.
July 22, 2025 (KS)
to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:29 :::CIS
Jarnail Singh and others vs. Ramesh Chand
RSA No.62 of 2023
.
22.07.2025 Present: Mr. Ashok Kumar Tyagi, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Vinod Chauhan, Advocate, for the respondent.
Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner
submits that learned original counsel is not available today on
not opposed.
r to
account of personal difficulty. She seeks an adjournment. Prayer
As prayed, list after two weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 22, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:29 :::CIS
Ravinder Kumar vs. Ajmer Singh and others
CMPMO No.327 of 2021
.
22.07.2025 Present: Ms. Muskan, Advocate, vice Mr. Arun Kaushal, Advocate,
for the petitioner.
Mr. Abhishek, Advocate, vice Mr. Parmod Singh Thakur,
Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 3.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.4/State.
r to
Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner
submits that learned original counsel is not available today on
account of personal difficulty. She seeks an adjournment. Prayer
not opposed.
As prayed, list after two weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 22, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:29 :::CIS
Raj Kumar vs. Manohar Lal
CMPMO No.283 of 2021
.
22.07.2025 Present: Mr. Ishan Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Vinod Kumar Thakur, Advocate, for the respondent.
At the request of learned counsel for the petitioner, list
after two weeks.
July 22, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:29 :::CIS
Phulma Devi (deceased) through LRs. vs. Bimla Devi
CMPMO No.277 of 2021
.
22.07.2025 Present: Mr. Parveen Chauhan, Advocate, vice Mr. Y.P. Sood,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Romesh Verma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sumit
Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent.
At the request of learned vice counsel appearing on behalf
r to
of the petitioner, list on 31.07.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 22, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:29 :::CIS
Dhani Ram @ Dhanu vs. Bandi Devi
CMPMO No.68 of 2021
.
22.07.2025 Present: Mr. H.S. Rangra, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms. Kusum, Advocate, vice Ms. Seema K. Guleria,
Advocate, for the respondent.
Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of the
respondent submits that learned original counsel is not available
today on account of personal difficulty.
r She seeks an
adjournment. Prayer not opposed.
As prayed, list after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 22, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:29 :::CIS
Ram Singh and another vs. Labh Singh and others
CMPMO No.21 of 2021
.
22.07.2025 Present: Mr. Parveen Chauhan, Advocate, vice Mr. Y.P. Sood ,
Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Ajay Chandel, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Further time prayed on behalf of learned counsel
appearing on behalf of the petitioners. Prayer allowed.
r to
List after two weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 22, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:29 :::CIS
Umesh Sant and another vs. Manav Sant and another
RSA No.228 of 2020
.
22.07.2025 Present: Mr. Karan Singh Kanwar, Advocate, for appellants No.1
and 3.
Name of appellant No.2 deleted vide order dated
18.05.2023.
Mr. Pranjal Munjal, Advocate, vice Mr. Ajeet Pal Singh,
Advocate, for respondent No.1.
dated 04.03.2021.
r to
Respondent No.2 proceeded against ex parte vide order
Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of respondent
No.1 submits that learned Senior Counsel is unavailable today on
account of ill health. He seeks an adjournment. Prayer allowed.
As prayed, list after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 22, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:29 :::CIS
Lal Chand vs. Moti Ram and others
CMPMO No.153 of 2020
.
22.07.2025 Present: Mr. Maan Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Dibender Ghosh, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner
submits that an amicable settlement is being worked out inter se
the parties.
Learned counsel for respondent No.1 seeks time to have
instructions in this regard.
List after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 22, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:29 :::CIS
United India Insurance Company vs. Sita Devi and
others
CMPMO No.90 of 2020
.
22.07.2025 Present: Mr. P.S. Chandel, Advocate, for the petitioner.
None for respondent No.1.
Henceforth, name of Mr. Rakesh Thakur, Advocate be
reflected in the cause list as a counsel for respondent No.1.
Power of attorney on behalf of respondent No.1 be filed
within four weeks. List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 22, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:29 :::CIS
United India Insurance Company vs. Neelam and
others
CMPMO No.89 of 2020
.
22.07.2025 Present: Mr. P.S. Chandel, Advocate, for the petitioner.
None for respondent No.1.
Henceforth, name of Mr. Rakesh Thakur, Advocate be
reflected in the cause list as a counsel for respondent No.1.
Power of attorney on behalf of respondent No.1 be filed
within four weeks. List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 22, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:29 :::CIS
Suraj Bahadur vs. M.C. Shimla
CMPMO No.957 of 2019
.
22.07.2025 Present: Mr. S.D. Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Mukul Sood, Advocate, for the respondent.
As jointly prayed, list on 06.08.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 22, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:29 :::CIS
Shiv Om Thakur vs. Kavita Negi Thakur and others
CMPMO No.622 of 2019
.
22.07.2025 Present: Mr. Pavinder Kumar, Advocate, vice Mr. Aditya Thakur,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Parikshit Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Respondents No.2 to 5 ex-parte vide order dated
22.05.2025.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.6/State.
As jointly prayed, list after eight weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 22, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:29 :::CIS
Saroj Kumari vs. Gayatri Devi and another
CMPMO No.390 of 2019
.
22.07.2025 Present: Mr. Subhash Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Prantap
Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Divya Raj Singh, Advocate, for the respondents.
Heard for sometime.
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks time to have
r to
instructions in the matter. List on 18.08.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 22, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:29 :::CIS
Vijay Sharma vs. HPTDC Ltd.
Execution Petition No.304 of 2025
.
22.07.2025 Present: Mr. Om Parkash Goel, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms. Shilpa Sood, Advocate, for the respondent.
The judgment sought to be executed was passed on
09.07.2024. A perusal of the same reflects that the said
judgment was passed once the respondent herein acceded to
the claim of the petitioner.
Under the aforesaid facts and attending circumstances of
the case, let judgment dated 09.07.2024 be complied with on or
before 07.08.2025.
List on 11.08.2025.
It is made clear that if the judgment in question is not
complied with on or before the next date of hearing, the
respondent shall personally remain present in the Court, on the
date fixed.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 22, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:29 :::CIS
Collector, Land Acquisition HPPWD and another vs.
Santu
.
CMP(M) No.771 of 2024
22.07.2025 Present: Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
applicants-appellants/State.
Sole respondent is stated to have expired.
CMP(M) Nos.498 & 499 of 2025
Proposed LRs. No.1(a), 1(c) and 1(d) are served.
However, there is no appearance on their behalf. Hence, they
are proceeded against ex-parte.
Insofar as proposed LR. 1(b) is concerned, as per report of
the Registry, she is stated to have died. Let consequential steps
for bringing on record the legal heirs of deceased proposed
LR. 1(b), be taken within four weeks. List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 22, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:29 :::CIS
Jawahar Lal vs. Vinet Sood and others
CMPMO No.723 of 2024
.
22.07.2025 Present: Mr. Tejasvi Verma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Karan Singh Kanwar, Advocate, for the respondent.
CMP No.24420 of 2024
No reply is intended to be filed to the present application
main case after two weeks.
r to
on behalf of the respondent. List for consideration along-with the
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 22, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:29 :::CIS
Devku and another vs. Lekh Ram and another
CMP(M) No.641 of 2024 in RSA No.119 of 2020
.
22.07.2025 Present: Mr. Trigun Singh, Advocate, vice Ms. Kusum Chaudhary,
Advocate, for the applicants.
Mr. Romesh Verma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sumit
Sharma, Advocate, for the respondents.
Time for filing rejoinder is being sought since 09.04.2025.
Let the needful be positively done within four weeks. List
thereafter. r
However, it is made clear that if rejoinder is not filed on or
before the next date of hearing, then the right to file the same
shall stand closed without further reference to this Court.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 22, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:29 :::CIS
Sushma vs. Sanjay Wadwa and others
CMPMO No.413 of 2024
.
22.07.2025 Present: Mr. Jeevan Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Vaibhav Chauhan, Advocate, vice Mr. Atul Sharma,
Advocate, for the respondents.
As jointly prayed, list for consideration after two weeks.
July 22, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:29 :::CIS
Balbir Singh vs. Urmil Kumari and another
CMPMO No.369 of 2024
.
22.07.2025 Present: Ms. Anuja Mehta, Advocate, vice Mr. Gurmeet Bhardwaj,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms. Rashmi Parmar, Advocate as Legal Aid Counsel, for
respondent No.1.
At the request of learned vice counsel appearing on behalf
r to
of the petitioner, list after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 22, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:29 :::CIS
Lot Ram and others vs. Dumnu and others
RSA No.156 of 2024
.
22.07.2025 Present: Mr. Trigun Singh, Advocate, vice Ms. Kusum Chaudhary,
Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. N.K. Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vishwas Kaushal,
Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 15.
Mr. Pratap Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.16(ii),
16(iii), 16(v) to 16(vii) and 19 to 21.
r to
Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate, for respondents No.17 and 18.
CMP No.16544 of 2025
In terms of order dated 25.03.2025, respondent No.16(i)
was to be served at Saudi Arabia where he voluntarily resides.
However, by virtue of the present application, it is informed that
respondent No.16(i) is presently in India and is residing in his
native place. The address of his native place is given in
Paragraph-6 of the present application.
In view of the aforesaid, let Dasti notice be issued to the
respondent No.16(i), returnable for 31.07.2025. Dasti notice be
handed over to learned counsel for the appellants/applicants for
effecting service upon the said respondent, latest by 24.07.2025.
While effecting service, it be ensured that the notices are in fact
being served upon the said respondent, on proper identification of
his passport.
The application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 22, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:29 :::CIS
Bhagwan Dass and another vs. Babu Ram
CMPMO No.133 of 2024
.
22.07.2025 Present: Mr. Raman Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Vinod Kumar
Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Vivek Singh Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. Mukul Sood,
Advocate, for the respondent.
List in terms of order dated 04.07.2025.
July 22, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:29 :::CIS
Bhupinder Singh vs. Surinder Pal and others
RSA No.108 of 2023
.
22.07.2025 Present: Mr. Atharv Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Ms. Tamana Sharma, Advocate, vice Ms. Amita Chandel,
Advocate, for respondents No.1 & 8.
Respondents No.2 to 6 & 7(i) to 7(iv) already ex parte.
Ms Rekha Bansal, Advocate, vice Mr. K.B. Khajuria,
Advocate, for respondent No.9.
within four weeks.
Power of attorney on behalf of respondent No.9 be filed
Since it is an admitted matter, list for hearing in due
course.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 22, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:29 :::CIS
Khem Raj and others vs. Raj Kumar and others
RSA No.43 of 2023
.
22.07.2025 Present: Mr. Sumit Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. B.C. Verma,
Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Ajay Chandel, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Lovneesh Kanwar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Tek
Chand, Advocate, for respondents No.2 and 3.
Respondents No.5, 7 and 9 ex-parte.
r to
None for respondents No.6(i) to 6(v).
CMP No.12251 of 2025
Additional substantial question of law framed therein shall
be considered at the time of admission of the appeal. List after
four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 22, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:29 :::CIS
Machhindernath Mandir & Machhiyal Sudhar Society
vs. Hari Singh and another
Civil Suit No.38 of 2023
.
22.07.2025 Present: Ms. Urwashi Rajta and Ms. Arushi Chauhan, Advocates,
vice Mr. P.P. Chauhan, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Defendant No.1 already ex parte.
Mr. Narender Singh Thakur, Advocate, for defendant No.2.
OMP No.1004 of 2025
Reply, if any, on behalf of the non-appliant be filed within
four weeks. List thereafter.
OMP No.1005 of 2025
The applicant is directed to file English translated copies of
the documents in question, appended along-with OMP No.1004
of 2025 within four weeks. The application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 22, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:29 :::CIS
Bhanu Pratap Singh and others vs. Achhar Singh and
others
RSA No. 75 of 2022
.
22.07.2025 Present: Mr. Rocky, Advocate, vice Mr. Devender K. Sharma,
Advocate, for the appellants.
Ms, Tamana Sharma, Advocate, for all the respondents,
except respondent No.1, who is stated to have expired.
CMP No.16215 of 2025
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is
allowed. The factum of death of respondent No.1-Achhar Singh
is taken on record. The application stands disposed of.
RSA No.75 of 2022
Let consequential steps for bringing on record the legal
heirs of deceased respondent No.1 be taken within four weeks.
List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 22, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:29 :::CIS
State of H.P. & Ors. Vs Mansu (deceased) through LRs.
RSA No. 122 of 2025.
.
21.07.2025 Present: Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General for the
appellants/State.
Mr. H.S. Rangra, Advocate for respondents no. 1(a) to
1(d).
RSA No. 122 of 2025
Admitted on substantial question of law No. 1 framed at
Page-11 of the paper book.
CMP No. 13615 of 2025
Operation and execution of impugned judgment and
decree dated 28.06.2022, passed by learned Additional District
Judge, Sundernagar, District Mandi, Himachal Pradesh, in Civil
Appeal No. 720 of 2013, shall remain stayed, subject to
depositing of the entire awarded amount along-with up-to-date
interest within a period of four weeks from today.
Reply if any be filed within four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 21, 2025 (Pramod) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:29 :::CIS
Bahadur Singh & Ors. Vs Dharami Devi
CMPMO No. 553 of 2024.
.
21.07.2025 Present: Ms. Karan Singh Kanwar, Advocate for the petitioners.
Ms. Nandita, Advocate vice Mr. Ravinder Singh Jaswal,
Advocate for the respondents.
At the request of learned Counsel appearing on behalf of
the petitioners, list on 08th August, 2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 21, 2025 (Pramod) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Jaswinder Singh Vs Kashmir Singh & Ors.
CMPMO No. 632 of 2024.
.
21.07.2025 Present: Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. H.M. Thakur, Advocate for vice Mr. Aman Parth
Sharma, Advocate for respondent no. 1.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General for
respondents no. 2 to 6/State.
Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no. 1
prayed for further time for obtaining instruction qua compliance of
before the next date.
r to
previous order dated 16.07.2025. Let the same be obtained on or
List on 07th August, 2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 21, 2025 (Pramod) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Atul Sud & Ors. Vs Arya Pratinidhi Sabha & anr.
CMPMO No. 646 of 2024.
.
21.07.2025 Present: Ms. Neeraj Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Pranjal Munjal,
Advocate for the petitioners.
Sh. Rakesh Thakur, Advocate for the respondents.
Learned Counsel for the petitioner prays for an
adjournment on the ground that the learned senior arguing
counsel, who has to argue the matter is not available today on
August, 2025.
r to
account of personal difficulty. Prayer not opposed. List on 12 th
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 21, 2025 (Pramod) Judge
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Arjun Thakur Vs Ravi Chand Thakur & ors.
CMPMO No. 653 of 2024.
.
21.07.2025 Present: Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vivek Negi,
Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Narender Guleria, Advocate for respondent no. 1.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Addl. Advocate General for
respondents no. 2 to 4/State.
Mr. Maan Singh, Advocate for respondent no. 5.
At the request of learned Counsel for respondent no. 1
matter is adjourned. List on 04.08.2025. Record of CWP No.
8554 of 2024 be also called for on the next date of hearing.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 21, 2025 (Pramod) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Bhagi Devi (deceased) through LRs. Vs Ram Dass
RSA No. 01 of 2025.
.
21.07.2025 Present: Ms. Naveen K. Bhardwaj, Advocate for the appellants.
Sh. G.R. Palsra, Advocate for the respondent.
At the request of learned Counsel appearing on behalf of
respondent, list after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 21, 2025 (Pramod) Judge
r to
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Rajesh Kumar Vs Kangra Central Cooperative Bank Ltd. & anr.
RFA No. 09 of 2025.
.
21.07.2025 Present: Ms. Aman Deep Sharma, Advocate for the appellant.
Mr. Sohan Singh Rathore, Advocate for respondent no. 1.
Mr. Javed Khan, Advocate for respondent no. 2.
Since the decretal amount along with upto date interest
has not been deposited. Therefore, in terms of previous order
dated 20.06.2015, interim protection granted vide order dated
27.02.2025 is vacated. At the request of the learned Counsel for
the appellant, list after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 21, 2025 (Pramod) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Savita Rani (deceased) through LRs Vs Kishori Lal
CMPMO No. 17 of 2025.
.
21.07.2025 Present: Ms. Surender K. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Divya Raj Singh, Advocate, for the respondent.
Learned Counsel for the petitioner prays for an
adjournment on the ground that the learned senior arguing
counsel, who has to argue the matter is not available today on
account of personal difficulty. Prayer not opposed. List after two
weeks. r ( Bipin C. Negi )
July 21, 2025 (Pramod) Judge
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Dev Bhagti Vs. Bresti Devi
RSA No. 31 of 2025
.
21.07.2025 Present: Ms. Karan Singh Kanwar, Advocate for the appellant.
Mr. M.S. Katoch, Advocate for the respondent.
As jointly prayed, list after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 21, 2025 (Pramod) Judge
r to
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Kaushalaya & ors. Vs Med Ram & ors.
CMPMO No. 304 of 2022
.
21.07.2025 Present: Ms. Chehak Khurana, Advocate vice Mr. N.K. Bhalla,
Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Rakesh Thakur, Advocate for respondents No. 1 to 3.
Learned Counsel for the respondents No. 1 to 3 prays for
an adjournment on the ground that the learned senior arguing
counsel, who has to argue the matter is not available today on
three weeks.
r to
account of personal difficulty. Prayer not opposed.
( Bipin C. Negi )
List after
July 21, 2025 (Pramod) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Jodh Singh and anr. Vs Ramesh Chand and anr.
RSA No. 389 of 2022.
.
21.07.2025 Present: Mr. Sumit Sood, Advocate for the appellants.
Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocate for the respondents.
CMP No. 18642 of 2024.
Rejoinder, if any, be filed within four weeks. List
thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 21, 2025 (Pramod) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Editor Newspaper Amar Ujala Vs Budhi Singh and Ors.
CMPMO No. 677 of 2022
.
21.07.2025 Present: Mr. Rahul Mahajan, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Naresh K. Sharma, Advocate for respondent no. 1.
Mr. Amit Singh Chandel, Advocate for respondent no. 3.
Mr. Vishwash Kaushal, Advocate for respondent no. 7.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Addl. Advocate General for the
respondent no. 8/State.
Respondent no. 2, 4 and 5 proceeded against ex-parte.
Name of respondent no. 6 stands deleted vide order dated
21.08.2023.
In pursuance of the previous order, learned Counsel for
the petitioner submits that the petitioner has not filed the written
statement before the learned trial Court. As prayed, list the matter
next week.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 21, 2025 (Pramod) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Ramtari and Ors. Vs Gauri and Ors.
Civil Revision No. 9 of 2023 a/w
Civil Revision No. 184 of 2022
.
21.07.2025 Present: Mr. Ajay Kumar Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners, in
both the petitions.
Mr. Divya Raj Singh, Advocate for the respondents, in both
the petitions.
As jointly prayed, list after two weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 21, 2025 (Pramod) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Bhupender Kaur Vs M/s Shivalik Cooperative Housing Board Society
Ltd.
C.R. No. 62 of 2023.
.
21.07.2025 Present: Mr. Abhishek Verma, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Romesh Verma, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sumit Sharma,
Advocate for the respondent no. 1.
Ms. Mamta, Advocate for the respondents no. 2 to 5.
Ms. Nandita, Advocate vice Mr. Vinod Chauhan Advocate
for respondent no. 6.
Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner
seeks adjournment on the ground that original Senior Counsel
who has to argue the matter is not available today on account of
illness. Prayer allowed.
List after one week.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 21, 2025 (Pramod) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Badri Ram Vs H.R.T.C. & ors.
Ex. Pet. No. 886 of 2025
.
21.07.2025 Present: Mr. Sat Prakash, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate for the respondents.
Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent
submits that similar issue is coming up before the Division Bench
of this Court on 24th July, 2025.
In due deference to the same list the present matter on
05th August, 2025.
Reply/instructions be filed/obtained on or before the said
date.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 21, 2025 (Pramod) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Karamjit Singh & ors. Vs State of H.P. & ors.
Ex. Pet. No. 893 of 2025
.
21.07.2025 Present: Mr. Onkar Jairath, Advocate for the petitioners.
Sh. Raj Kumar Negi, Addl. Advocate General for the
respondents.
Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent/
State submits that in terms of judgment dated 12.08.2024 passed
in CWP No. 8038 of 2024, an appropriate decision on the
within four weeks.
r to
representation filed by the petitioners shall be positively taken
The representation is to be decided on or before 18 th
August, 2025. It is made clear that if representation is not
decided on or before the said date, then concerned Director
(respondent no. 2) shall remain present in person.
List on 22nd August, 2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 21, 2025 (Pramod) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Ranjana & ors. Vs State of H.P. & ors.
Ex. Pet. No. 934 of 2025
.
21.07.2025 Present: Mr. Onkar Jairath, Advocate for the petitioners.
Sh. Raj Kumar Negi, Addl. Advocate General for the
respondents.
Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent/
State submits that in terms of judgment dated 12.08.2024 passed
in CWP No. 8032 of 2024, an appropriate decision on the
within four weeks.
r to
representation filed by the petitioners shall be positively taken
The representation is to be decided on or before 18 th
August, 2025. It is made clear that if representation is not
decided on or before said date, then concerned Director
(respondent no. 2) shall remain present in person.
List on 22nd August, 2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 21, 2025 (Pramod) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Pradeep Kumar & anr. Vs Asha Thakur
RSA No. 4270 of 2013
.
21.07.2025 Present: Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Pranjal
Munjal, Advocate for appellant.
Mr. B.C. Verma, Advocate for respondents No. 2 to 5.
Respondent no. 1 stated to be dead.
CMP No. 1200 of 2025
No reply is intended to be filed by the non applicants. Non
applicants have no objection if the application is allowed and the
name of deceased respondent No. 1 is ordered to be deleted
from the array of respondents. Respondent no. 1 is stated to
have died on 13.11.2019. As per death certificate, the legal heirs
in whose favour the right to sue survives on the death of the
deceased respondent are already on record. In view of the
above, the present application is allowed and the name of
respondent no. 1 i.e. Smt. Asha Thakur is ordered to be deleted
from the array of parties. Let amended memo be filed within two
weeks.
Application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 21, 2025 (Pramod) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Sarla & Ors. Vs Jagan Nath Chadha
C.R. No. 91 of 2013
.
21.07.2025 Present: Mr. Divya Raj Singh, Advocate for the petitioners.
Sh. Het Ram Thakur, Advocate for respondents No. 1(a) to
1(e)
CMP No. 7298 of 2025
Reply if any be filed within four weeks.
List thereafter.
July 21, 2025 (Pramod)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Rameshwar Mahadev Mandir Vs Jaspal Singh Negi
RSA No. 65 of 2023.
.
21.07.2025 Present: Mr. Surender Saklani, Advocate for the appellant.
Mr. Ajay Sharma, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Tarun Brakta,
Advocate for respondent No. 1.
Respondents No. 2 and 4 are stated to have expired.
Ms. Narvada Thakur, Advocate for respondents No. 3, 5 to
7.
CMP No. 10994 of 2025
Since the address of legal heirs of deceased respondent
no. 4 is being furnished during the course of the day, whereupon
notice shall be issued to them returnable within four weeks. In
view thereof the order dated 01.04.2025 is recalled. The appeal
is restored to its original number. The application stands
disposed of.
CMP No. 10995 of 2025
Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant
submits that the addresses for service of legal heirs of deceased
respondent no. 4 shall be furnished during the course of the day.
In view thereof, the present application is disposed of.
CMP (M) No. 485 of 2024.
Since address of LRs of deceased respondent no. 4 has
been furnished, therefore, issue notice to them returnable within
four weeks.
List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 21, 2025 (Pramod) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Salochana alias Sonu vs. Dhiraj Sharma
CMPMO No.521 of 2024
.
11.07.2025 Present: Kanwar Bhupinder Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Harshit
Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent.
As jointly prayed, list after four weeks.
July 11, 2025 (KS)
to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Salochana alias Sonu vs. Dhiraj Sharma
CMPMO No.521 of 2024
.
11.07.2025 Present: Kanwar Bhupinder Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Harshit
Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent.
As jointly prayed, list after four weeks.
July 11, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Himanshu Gupta vs. Nirmla Malhotra and others
CMPMO No.490 of 2024
.
11.07.2025 Present: Mr. Parveen Chauhan, Advocate, vice Mr. N.K. Bhalla,
Advocate, for the petitioner, who is stated to have died.
Let steps for bringing on record the legal heirs of deceased
petitioner be taken within four weeks. List thereafter.
July 11, 2025 (KS)
to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Sameer
Singh Bhandari
.
CMPMO No.415 of 2024
11.07.2025 Present: Mr. Sachin Sunail, Advocate, vice Mr. Chandan Goel,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
At the request of learned counsel appearing on behalf of
the petitioner in order to enable him to prepare the case, list after
four weeks.
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
July 11, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Savita Sharma vs. Chander Kant and others
CMPMO No.371 of 2024
.
11.07.2025 Present: Mr. Atharv Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. N.K. Bhalla,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Parveen Chauhan, Advocate, vice Mr. Y.P. Sood,
Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondents No.2 & 3/State.
r to
As jointly prayed, list after six weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 11, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
NTPC Limited vs. Nanki (deceased) through LRs. and
others
Civil Revision No.207 of 2024
.
11.07.2025 Present: Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Harshit
Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Varun Rana, Advocate, for respondents No.1 and 2.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.3/State.
Similar issue is coming up before this Court on
02.09.2025. Hence, list on 02.09.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 11, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Ishwar Kumar vs. Vikas Sudan and another
Civil Revision No.156 of 2024
.
11.07.2025 Present: Mr. Sunil Gautam, Advocate, vice Mr. Nitin Soni, Advocate,
for the petitioner.
Mr. Varun Chauhan, Advocate, for the proposed legal heris of
respondent No.1, who is stated to have expired.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.2/State.
At the request of learned vice counsel appearing on behalf
of the petitioner, list after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 11, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Archana Singh vs. Babita Gupta
Civil Suit No.17 of 2025
.
11.07.2025 Present: None for the plaintiff.
Despite repeated calls, there is no appearance on behalf
of the plaintiff. In the interest of justice, list after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 11, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Sunder Singh vs. Mohan Lal a/w connected matters
RSA No. 123 of 2024 a/w RSA Nos.186 and 191 of 2024
.
RSA No. 123 of 2024
11.07.2025 Present: Mr. Karan Singh Kanwar, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Desh Raj Thakur, Advocate, for the respondent.
RSA Nos. 186 and 191 of 2024
Mr. Desh Raj Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant(s), in
both the appeals.
Mr. Karan Singh Kanwar, Advocate, for the respondent(s),
in both the appeals.
RSA No. 123 of 2024
Certified copy of the Trial Court judgment be placed on
record on or before the next date of hearing. List after four
weeks.
RSA Nos.186 and 191 of 2024
List along-with RSA No.123 of 2024.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 11, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Sudesh Sood and another vs. Abhishek Vashisht and
another
CMPMO No.111 of 2024
.
11.07.2025 Present: Mr. Abhishek, Advocate, vice Mr. Ajay Kumar Sharma,
Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Harshit
Sharma, Advocate, for the respondents.
At the request of learned vice counsel appearing on behalf
of the petitioners, list on 28.07.2025.
r ( Bipin C. Negi )
July 11, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Jeewan Singh and others vs. Prem Lal and others
RSA No.53 of 2024
.
11.07.2025 Present: Mr. Ashwani Negi, Advocate, vice Mr. Dibender Ghosh,
Advocate, for the appellants.
Ms. Pallvi, Advocate, vice Mr. K.B. Khajuria, Advocate, for
respondents No.1 to 12.
Mr. Rakesh Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. J.P. Sharma,
Advocate, for respondents No.14 and 15.
CMP No.3886 of 2024
Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of the
applicants/appellants submits that learned original counsel is not
available today on account of personal difficulty. He seeks an
adjournment. Prayer not opposed.
As prayed, list after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 11, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Ram Dass vs. Krishan (deceased) through LRs. and
others
RSA No.285 of 2023
.
11.07.2025 Present: Mr. Het Ram Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Jia Lal, Advocate, vice Mr. G.R. Palsra, Advocate, for
respondents No.1(a) to 1(d), 2, 3 and 5.
Respondent No.4 proceeded against ex parte.
Name of respondent No.6 stands deleted vide order dated
28.03.2024.
Further time prayed to inspect the record. In view thereof,
list the matter after six weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 11, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Geeta Devi and others vs. Shiv Pal and others a/w
connected matters
RSA Nos.250 and 251 of 2023
.
11.07.2025 Present: Mr. MukeshThakur, Advocate, vice Mr. H.S. Rangra,
Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Jia Lal, Advocate, vice Mr. G.R. Palsra, Advocate, for
respondents No.1 to 7.
As jointly prayed, list after four weeks.
July 11, 2025 (KS)
to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Kashmir Singh vs. State of HP and others
CMPMO No.190 of 2023
.
11.07.2025 Present: Mr. Rakesh Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for
respondents No.1 and 2.
Mr. Malay Kaushal, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
CMP No.16042 of 2025
The present application is dismissed as withdrawn by
learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant with liberty
reserved to file certified copies of the documents sought to be
placed on record by way of the present application. The
application stands disposed of.
CMP No.16045 of 2025
In view of withdrawal of CMP No.16042 of 2025, the
present application has become infructuous. The application
stands disposed of accordingly.
CMPMO No.190 of 2023
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner
submits that an appropriate application for placing on record
certified copies of the applications dated 30.11.2021 and
28.04.2022 filed before the Collector, Bilaspur and certified copy
of the zimini orders qua proceedings pending in appeal No.112 of
2020 before the Divisional Commissioner, Mandi, has been filed
in the Registry on 10.07.2025.
If in order, be placed on record. List after two weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 11, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Sanjeev Kumar Sharma and another vs. Suman
Sharma and others
Civil Revision No.10 of 2020
.
11.07.2025 Present: Ms. Meera Devi, Advocate, vice Mr. Deepak Gupta,
Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Sumit Sood, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 3.
Name of respondent No.4 is deleted vide order dated
16.12.2021.
Proforma respondent No.6 is stated to have expired.
Further time prayed to comply with order dated
13.05.2025. Let the needful be done within four weeks. List
thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 11, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Hari Chand and others vs. NHAI and another
Arbitration Case No.29 of 2025
.
11.07.2025 Present: Mr. Nalnush Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Hamender Singh
Chandel, Advocate, for the applicants.
Mr. Karan Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.2/State.
Further time prayed on behalf of the appellant/non-
applicant to have instructions in the matter.
List on 28.07.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 11, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Shimla Jal Prabandhan Nigam Limited vs. Lagnu Ram
(deceased) through LRs. and others
CMP No.14954 of 2025 in RFA No.388 of 2017
.
11.07.2025 Present: Mr. Ashir Kaith, Advocate, vice Mr. Hamender Singh
Chandel, Advocate, for the appellant/non-applicant.
Mr. Rajat Kumar, Advocate, vice Mr. Ramesh Chand
Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.1, who is stated to
have expired/applicants in CMP No.14954 of 2025.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondents No.2 and 3/State.
Further time prayed on behalf of the appellant/non-
applicant to have instructions in the matter.
List on 28.07.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 11, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Dinesh Kumar vs. Vikas Sudan
Civil Revision No.194 of 2024
.
11.07.2025 Present: Mr. Sat Parkash, Advocate, for the petitioner.
CMP(M) No.1149 & 1150 of 2025
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the legal
heirs of deceased sole respondent, detailed in Paragraph-3 of the
application (CMP(M) No.1149 of 2025), returnable within four
weeks. r
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 11, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
The Himachal Pradesh State Electronics Development
Corporation Limited vs. M/s Innovative Secure
Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
.
CMP(M) No.1143 of 2025
11.07.2025 Present: Mr. Pawan K. Sharma, Advocate, for the applicant/
appellant.
CMP No.156939 of 2025
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is
allowed. The delay in re-filing the appeal, is condoned. The
application stands disposed of.
CMP(M) No.1143 of 2025
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the
respondent, returnable within four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 11, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Sanjay Kumar vs. State of HP and others
Execution Petition No.830 of 2025
.
11.07.2025 Present: Mr. V.B. Verma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondents/State.
Notice. Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, learned Additional Advocate
General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the
respondents and seeks time to file reply.
Reply/instructions on behalf of the respondents be filed
within four weeks. List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 11, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Yuvraj Kumar vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Cr.MP(M) No.599 of 2025
.
11.07.2025 Present: Mr. Anirudh Sharma and Mr. Pavinder, Advocates, for the
petitioner.
Mr. R.P. Singh, Deputy Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
L/ASI, Kamlesh, Women Police Station, Baddi, District Solan,
Himachal Pradesh is present along-with record.
In pursuance to the previous order, learned counsel
appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the zimini
orders of the Trial Court have been filed by moving an
appropriate application in the Registry today itself. If in order, let
the application be placed on record on or before the next date of
hearing.
List on 28.07.2025.
Besides the aforesaid, fresh status report has been filed
on behalf of the respondent-State. The same is taken on record.
Copy whereof has been supplied to learned counsel for the
petitioner.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 11, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Sohan Lal vs. Harbans Singh
CMP(M) No.574 of 2025
.
11.07.2025 Present: Mr. Balwant Singh Thakur, for the petitioner.
Ms. Prajwal Busta, Advocate, for the respondent.
Ms. Prajwal Busta, learned counsel, has put in appearance
on behalf of the respondents. She seeks time to file power of
attorney and reply.
Let the needful be done within four weeks. List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 11, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Vikram Minhas and another vs. Vikas Sudan
Civil Revision No.53 of 2024
.
11.07.2025 Present: Mr. Anirudh Sood, Advocate, vice Mr. Rajeev Sood,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
CMP(M) No.390 of 2025
Though served, none has put in appearance on behalf of
the legal heirs of deceased sole respondent, in the case at hand.
Sole respondent -Vikas Sudan is stated to have expired on
15.12.2024. The same is evident form the Death Certificate
appended along-with the application as Annexure A-1. The
details of the legal heirs are given in Paragraph-2 of the
application.
The application is within time. Since the right to sue
inheres/survives with the aforesaid legal heirs of deceased sole
respondent, therefore, they are ordered to be brought on record
as respondents No.1(i) to 1(iii).
The application stands disposed of.
Amended memo of parties be filed within a period of two
weeks.
Civil Revision No.53 of 2024
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the
newly added respondents, i.e., respondents No.1(i) to 1(iii),
returnable within four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 11, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
M/s Tee & Tee Healthcare and others vs. Nand Lal
Sharma and another
Civil Revision No.31 of 2022
.
11.07.2025 Present: Mr. V.B. Verma, Advocate, for petitioners No.1 & 3.
Petitioner No.2 is stated to have expired.
Mr. B.P. Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Arun Kumar,
Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Mukul Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
CMP(M) No.389 of 2025 in Civil Revision No.31 of 2022
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicants. The non-applicants have no objection, if in case, the
application is allowed and the legal heirs of deceased petitioner
No.2-Vinod Gupta, are brought on record as is being sought in
the application.
Petitioner No.2-Vinod Gupta is stated to have expired on
07.12.2014. The same is evident form the Death Certificate
appended along-with the application as Annexure A-1. The
details of the legal heirs are given in Paragraph-2 of the
application, which are in consonance with the details given in the
Legal Heir Certificate appended along-with the application as
Annexure A-2.
The application is within time. Since the right to sue
inheres/survives with the aforesaid legal heirs of deceased
petitioner No.2, therefore, they are ordered to be brought on
record as petitioner No.2(a) to 2(d).
The application stands disposed of.
Amended memo of parties filed with the application is
ordered to be taken on record. Be placed at its appropriate
place.
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Civil Revision No.31 of 2022
.
List for consideration after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 11, 2025 (KS) Judge
r to
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Lekh Raj vs. Tirath Ram (deceased) through LRs.
CMP(M) No.893 of 2024
a/w CMP(M) No.914 of 2024
.
11.07.2025 Present: Mr. Arush Matlotia, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Suri, Advocate, for respondents
No.1(i) to 1(iii).
Power of attorney and reply on behalf of respondents
No.1(i) to 1(iii) are stated to have been filed. However, the same
are not on record. Learned counsel for the applicant submits
that he has received the copy of reply and seeks time to file
rejoinder thereto.
Registry to trace the power of attorney and reply so filed
and place on record well before the next date of hearing, post
removal of objection(s), if any.
List after four weeks. Rejoinder be filed on or before the
next date of hearing. It be ensured that pleadings, post removal
of objection(s), if any, (reply/rejoinder) are on record before the
next date of hearing.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 11, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
HPSEB vs. Bhagat Ram (deceased) through LRs. and
others
.
CMP No.13268 of 2025 a/w CMP Nos.13269 of 2025,
13270 and 13271 of 2025 in RFA No.212 of 2012
09.07.2025 Present: Ms. Sunita Sharma, Senior Advocate with Ms. Sugandh
Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant-non-applicant.
Mr. H.S. Rangra, Advocate, for the respondents-
applicants.
CMP No.13268 of 2025
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicants. The non-applicants have no objection, if in case, the
application is allowed and the legal heirs of deceased respondent
No.1-A (Daulat Ram) are brought on record as is being sought in
the application.
Respondent No.1-A (Daulat Ram) is stated to have
expired on 28.12.2014. The same is evident form the Death
Certificate appended along-with the application as Annexure A-1.
The details of the legal heirs are given in the Legal Heir
Certificate appended along-with the application as Annexure A-2.
Since the right to sue inheres/survives with the aforesaid
legal heirs of deceased respondent No.1-A, therefore, they are
ordered to be brought on record as respondents No.1-A(i) to 1-
A(vi).
The application stands disposed of.
Amended memo of parties be filed within four weeks.
CMP No.13269 of 2025
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicants. The non-applicants have no objection, if in case, the
application is allowed and the legal heirs of deceased respondent
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
.
No.1-F (Vinod Kumar) are brought on record as is being sought in
the application.
Respondent No.1-F (Vinod Kumar) is stated to have
expired on 08.12.2019. The same is evident form the Death
Certificate appended along-with the application as Annexure A-3.
The details of the legal heirs are given in the Legal Heir
Certificate appended along-with the application as Annexure A-4.
Since the right to sue inheres/survives with the aforesaid
legal heirs of deceased respondent No.1-F, therefore, they are
ordered to be brought on record as respondents No.1-F(i) to
1-F(iv).
The application stands disposed of.
Amended memo of parties be filed within four weeks.
CMP No.13270 of 2025
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicants. The non-applicants have no objection, if in case the
amount lying deposited in this Registry of this Court along-with
proportionate interest accrued thereupon, is released in favour of
the applicants, as is being sought in the application.
The appeal, in the case at hand, was disposed of by a Co-
ordinate Bench of this Court on 24.05.2017. Learned counsel for
the parties submit that no further proceedings against the said
decision are pending before the Hon’ble Apex Court.
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is
allowed. The amount lying deposited in the Registry of this Court,
along-with proportionate interest accrued thereupon is ordered to
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
be released in favour of the applicants in terms of their respective
shares detailed in Paragraph-2 of the application. The amount be
.
remitted to their bank account(s), details whereof have been
given in Paragraph-4 of the application, subject to proper
verification. The application stands disposed of.
CMP No.13271 of 2025
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicants. The non-applicants have no objection, if in case the
amount lying deposited in this Registry of this Court along-with
proportionate interest accrued thereupon, is released in favour of
the applicant/respondent No.1-A(v), i.e. Meena Devi, as is being
sought in the application.
The appeal, in the case at hand, was disposed of by a Co-
ordinate Bench of this Court on 24.05.2017. Learned counsel for
the parties submit that no further proceedings against the said
decision are pending before the Hon’ble Apex Court.
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is
allowed. The amount lying deposited in the Registry of this Court,
along-with interest accrued thereupon is ordered to be released in
favour of the applicant, in terms of her share detailed in
Paragraph-2 of the application. The amount be remitted to her
bank account, details whereof have been given in Paragraph-4 of
the application, subject to her proper verification. The application
stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 09, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Ashif Khan vs. Amreen Khan
CMPMO No.465 of 2024
.
09.07.2025 Present: Mr. Bimal Gupta, Senior Advocate with Ms. Simran Kaur,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Karan Singh Kanwar, Advocate, for the respondent.
It is jointly submitted that there is possibility of amicable
settlement between the parties.
r to
In view thereof, list the matter on 08.08.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 09, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Ramesh Kumar vs. Jagdish Chand and others
RSA No.251 of 2024
.
09.07.2025 Present: Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Parveen Chandel, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to
4.
Further time prayed to inspect the record.
Let the needful be done on or before the next date of
hearing. List after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 09, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Vidya Devi vs. Surat Ram
RSA No.236 of 2024
.
09.07.2025 Present: Mr. Bimal Gupta, Senior Advocate with Ms. Simran Kaur,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Parveen Chauhan, Advocate, vice Mr. Y.P. Sood,
Advocate, for the respondent.
Further time prayed for filing certified copy of the Trial
Court judgment.
Let the needful be done on or before the next date of
hearing. List after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 09, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Chamaroo (deceased) through LR and another vs. Om
Chand
RSA No.172 of 2024
.
09.07.2025 Present: Mr. J.P. Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Jagan Nath,
Advocate, for the appellants.
Ms. Tanu Chauhan, Advocate, vice Mr. Ajay Chandel,
Advocate, for the respondent.
Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of the
r to
respondent submits that learned original counsel is not available
today on account of personal difficulty.
adjournment. Prayer not opposed.
She seeks an
As prayed, list after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 09, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Jagdish Singh vs. Deepak Kumar
RSA No.131 of 2024
.
09.07.2025 Present: Mr. Ashok Kumar Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Digvijay Singh Bisht, Advocate, vice Mr. B.C. Verma,
Advocate, for the respondent.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant
submits that he needs time to reconstruct his brief. In view
thereof, he prays for an adjournment. Prayer allowed.
List after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 09, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Des Raj vs. The Himachal Pradesh Toursim
Development Corporation Ltd.
.
Execution Petition No.213 of 2025
09.07.2025 Present: Mr. O.P. Goel, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Shivank Singh Panta, Advocate, for the respondent.
Instructions be positively obtained by the respondents on
or before the next date of hearing.
List on 30.07.2025. It is made clear that if the judgment in
question is not implemented on or before the next date of hearing
then appropriate coercive action shall be taken.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 09, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
State of HP and others vs. Prem Singh and others
RSA No.94 of 2025
.
09.07.2025 Present: Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
applicants/State.
Mr. Vivek Chandel, Advocate, for the respondents.
The decretal amount, as directed vide order dated
02.05.2025, if not deposited, be deposited within a period of eight
weeks.
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
July 09, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
.
Civil Suit No.89 of 2021
09.07.2025 Present: Mr. Atul Jhingan and Ms. Shilpa Sood, Advocates, for the
plaintiff.
Ms. Srishti Chauhan, Advocate, for defendant No.1.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for
respondents No.2 to 4/State.
thereafter.
r to
Written statement be filed within four weeks. List
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 09, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Raveesh Ninta and another vs. State of HP and
another
Execution Petition No.587 of 2025
.
09.07.2025 Present: Mr. Yogesh Kumar Chandel, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondents/State.
Learned Additional Advocate General had placed on
record instructions dated 08.07.2025. Along-with the same,
corrigendum dated 08.07.2025 has been placed. In view thereof,
learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents-State
submits that the financial benefits shall be positively released to
the present petitioners within four weeks.
It is made clear that if the said benefits are not released to
the petitioners within four weeks, then coercive action shall be
taken.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 09, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Khub Raj vs. HRTC
Execution Petition No.98 of 2025
.
09.07.2025 Present: Mr. Rahul Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. Rakesh Kumar
Dogra, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms. Ashima Premy, Advocate, vice Mr. Raman Jamalta,
Advocate, for the respondent.
Notice. Ms. Ashima Premy, learned Advocate, appears
seeks time to file reply.
r to
and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondent and
Reply/instructions on behalf of the respondents be filed
within four weeks. List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 09, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Bhadru @ Bhadar Singh vs. Union of India and
others
OMP(M) No.36 of 2025
.
09.07.2025 Present: Mr. Vinay Thakur, Advocate, for the applicant-appellant.
Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Senior Panel Counsel, for
respondent No.1/Union of India.
Ms. Sneh Bhimta, Advocate, vice Ms. Shreya Chauhan,
Advocate, for respondents No.2 and 3.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.4/State.
OMP(M) No.36 of 2025
Heard counsel for the parties. Perused the pleadings.
For the sufficient reasons and cause shown in the
application, delay of 110 days in filing the present appeal, is
condoned. The application stands disposed of.
Arbitration Appeal No._____of 2025
Be registered.
Notice. Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, learned Senior Panel
counsel, Ms. Sneh Bhimta, learned counsel and Mr. B.N.
Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General, appear and waive
service of notice on behalf of respondent No.1, respondents No.2
& 3 and respondent No.4, respectively.
List for admission after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 09, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Ram Kumar vs. Surjeet Kaur and others
CMPMO No.36 of 2025
.
09.07.2025 Present: Mr. Anshul Jairath, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Respondent No.5 is stated to have expired.
Steps for the service of respondents No.1 to 4 are stated
to have been taken on 08.07.2025. If so, then let notice be
issued to the said respondents, returnable within four weeks.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner
submits that the legal heirs of deceased respondent No.5 already
exist on record. Hence, an appropriate in this regard be filed on
or before the next date of hearing.
List after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 09, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Ram Kumar vs. Surjeet Kaur and others
CMPMO No.36 of 2025
.
09.07.2025 Present: Mr. Anshul Jairath, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Respondent No.5 is stated to have expired.
Steps for the service of respondents No.1 to 4 are stated
to have been taken on 08.07.2025. If so, then let notice be
issued to the said respondents, returnable within four weeks.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner
submits that the legal heirs of deceased respondent No.5 already
exist on record. Hence, an appropriate in this regard be filed on
or before the next date of hearing.
List after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 09, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Banti Devi and another vs. Rakesh Sharma and others
CMP No.24569 of 2024 in
RSA No.314 of 2022
.
09.07.2025 Present: Mr. H.C. Sharma, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Navlesh Verma and Ms. Saloni Nee Susham Lata,
Advocate, for the applicants/ respondents No.1 and 2.
None for respondent No.3.
Mr. Shashi Shirshoo, Senior Panel Counsel, for
respondent No.4.
r to
None for respondent No.5.
Perused the judgment passed by the Trial Court dated
05.03.2022, whereby the suit filed by applicants No.1 and
2/respondents No.1 and 2 herein, had been decreed. One of the
consequence of decreeing the suit being that the present
respondents No.1 and 2/plaintiffs before the Trial Court were
entitled to recovery of use and occupation charges @ of 1,000/-
p.m. from the date of filing of the suit till the recovery of the
possession from the non-applicants/appellants No.1 and 2. The
appeal preferred against the said judgment and decree was
dismissed by the First Appellate Court on 30.07.2022. Regular
First Appeal preferred there from by the present non
applicants/appellants was dismissed vide judgment dated
11.10.2023. Special Leave to Appeal preferred was also
dismissed by the Apex Court.
In view of the aforesaid, amount lying deposited in the
Registry of this Court along-with proportionate interest accrued
thereupon is ordered to be released in favour of the
applicants/respondents No.1 and 2 herein, in terms of their
respective shares. The amount be remitted to their bank
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
account(s), details whereof have been given in Paragraph-4 of
.
the application, subject to proper verification. The application
stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 09, 2025 (KS) Judge
r to
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Sudarshan Kumar vs. Jai Chand and others
CMP(M) No.445 of 2024
.
09.07.2025 Present: Ms. Kavita Kajal, Advocate, vice Mr. Atharv Sharma,
Advocate, for the applicant.
Ms. Rekha Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Rejoinder, if any, be filed within six weeks. List thereafter.
July 09, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Amar Singh Rathor vs. Shyama Dogra and another
CMPMO No.264 of 2024
.
09.07.2025 Present: Mr. Abhimanyu Rathor, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Option, in terms of order dated 11.06.2024, be positively
exercised within a period of two weeks. It is made clear that if the
option is not exercised within the said period, matter shall be
dismissed for non prosecution without further reference to this
Court. r
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 09, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Shyam Dass vs. Ram Dayal (deceased) through LRs.
RSA No.241 of 2024
.
09.07.2025 Present: Mr. Shivom Vashisht, Advocate, for the appellant.
Respondent No.1 is stated to have expired.
None for respondents No.2, 3 and 4.
CMP(M) No.835 & 836 of 2025
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the legal
heirs of deceased respondent No.1, detailed in Paragraph-2 of
the application (CMP(M) No.835 of 2025), returnable within four
weeks.
CMP No.12396 of 2025
Allowed and the applicant is exempted from filing
translated copies of Annexure A-2, annexed with the
accompanying application, at this stage, subject to filing of the
same within seven days, as and when directed to do so. The
application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 09, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Amar Singh Rathor vs. Shyama Dogra and another
CMPMO No.234 of 2024
.
09.07.2025 Present: Mr. Abhimanyu Rathor, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Y.P. Sood, Advocate, for the respondents.
At the request of learned counsel for the petitioner, list
after four weeks.
July 09, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
National Highway Authority of India vs. Krishan Lal
OMP(M) No.37 of 2024
.
09.07.2025 Present: Ms. Sneh Bhimta, Advocate, vice Ms. Shreya Chauhan,
Advocate, for the applicant-appellant.
Mr. Suneet Verma, Advocate, vice Mr. Varun Chandel,
Advocate, for the respondents.
OMP(M) No.37 of 2024
The application is not opposed.
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is
allowed. The delay in filing the appeal is condoned. The
application stands disposed of.
Arb. Appeal No._______/2025
Be registered.
Admit.
OMPST No. 16170 of 2024
Be registered.
Notice in the aforesaid terms.
Mr. Suneet Verma, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of
the respondent and seeks time to file the reply. Be filed on or
before the next date.
List on 25.8.2025.
In the meanwhile, execution of impugned order/judgment
dated 19.4.2023, passed by the learned District Judge, Mandi in
CMA No.43/2023 (Reg. No.134 of 2023), shall remain stayed,
subject to deposit of entire award amount along with up-to-date
interest, within a period of six weeks from today.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 09, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Union of India vs. Ses Ram and another
CMP(M) No.1230 of 2023 & CMP No.13060 of 2023 in
RFA No.308 of 2007
.
09.07.2025 Present: Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Senior Panel Counsel, for the
applicant/appellant.
Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sparsh
Bhushan, Advocate, for respondents No.1(i) to 1(iii) and
1(vi) to (xiv).
None for respondents No.1(iv) and 1(v).
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.2/State.
CMP No.13060 of 2023
Amended memo of parties be filed within four weeks.
List along with CMP(M) No.1498 of 2024.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 09, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Milap Chand and others vs. Bihari Lal (deceased) and
others
RSA No.253 of 2023
.
09.07.2025 Present: Mr. Digvijay Singh Bisht, Advocate, vice Mr. B.C. Verma,
Advocate, for the appellants.
Respondent No.3 is stated to have expired. Let
consequential steps for bringing on record his legal heirs be taken
within four weeks.
In terms of order dated 18.11.2024, respondents No.4 and
5 were served by way of affixation. In view thereof, there is no
need to serve these respondents again.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 09, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Anand Kumar Sethi and another vs. Nishant Thakur
and others
CMPMO No.61 of 2022
.
09.07.2025 Present: Mr. Parikshit Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Vipin Pandit,
Advocate, for the petitioners.
None for respondents No.1 to 8.
Respondent No.9 is stated to have expired.
Let consequential steps, by filing correct address of
proposed LR-9(a), be positively taken within two weeks. On
taking such steps, issue notice to the said legal heir, returnable
within four weeks thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 09, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
HPFC vs. Dharam Lata a/w connected matter
Civil Revision No.220 of 2018 a/w RSA No.17 of 2019
.
08.07.2025 Present: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Atharv
Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner, in CR No.220/2018
and for the appellant in RSA No.17/2019.
Mr. Ajay Sharma and Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Advocates,
for respondents No.1(a) and 1(c), in CR No.220/2018 and
RSA No.17/2019.
Mr. Pavan Thakur, vice Mr. Prantap Sharma, Advocate, for
respondent No.2, in RSA No.17 of 2019.
As jointly prayed, list on 24.07.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 08, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Kewal Singh vs. Tarsem Singh and others
.
Civil Suit No.16 of 2023
08.07.2025 Present: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Atharv
Sharma, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Mr. Aditya Chouhan, Advocate, for defendant No.1.
Mr. Hitesh Kumar, Advocate, for defendants No.2(i) and
2(iii).
OMP(M) No.140 of 2023
Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the
record.
Defendant No.2(ii)-Charan Dass is stated to have expired
on 09.08.2017. The same is evident from the Death Certificate
appended along with the present application as Annexure A-1.
The suit in the case at hand was filed on 20.03.2023.
It is only when notices were served on the defendants that
the factum of death of Charan Dass, i.e., defendant No.2(ii) came
to the light.
Deceased defendant No.2(ii) is survived by his legal heirs,
details whereof, have been given in Paragraph-2 of the
application, which is in consonance with the details given in copy
of Pariwar Register appended along-with the present application.
In fact, defendant No.2(i) and defendant No.2(iii) are the
legal heirs of deceased Charan Dass, i.e. defendant No.2(ii).
Defendant No.2(i) is the son of deceased Charan Dass and
defendant No.2(iii) is the wife of Charan Dass. The only legal heir
who is to be brought on record is Ms. Jaswinder Kaur, daughter
of deceased Charan Dass.
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Since the wife and son of Charan Dass- deceased
.
defendant No.2(ii) are already on record as defendant No.2(i) and
2(iii), therefore, legal heir-Ms. Jaswinder Kaur, daughter of
deceased defendant No.2(ii)-Charan Dass, is ordered to be
brought on record.
The application stands disposed of. Amended memo of
parties filed with the application is taken on record.
OMP No.914 of 2025
No reply is stated to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicants. The non-applicants have no objection, if in case the
application is allowed and the typographical error which has been
caused in the cause title is ordered to be rectified.
In fact, defendant No.2-Banta had only one legal heir,
namely Charan Dass. Charan Dass died on 09.08.2017. The
legal heirs of Charan Dass in whom the right to sue survives, are
wife-Smt. Sumati , son-Gurdeep and daughter-Jaswinder Kaur.
In view of the aforesaid, present application is allowed.
Henceforth in the cause title, Charan Dass would be reflected as
defendant No.2(i), his wife-Smt. Sumati as defendant No.2(i)(a),
son-Gurdeep as defendant No.2(i)(b) and daughter-Jaswinder
Kaur as defendant No.2(i)(c).
The application stands disposed of. Amended memo of
parties is ordered to be taken on record.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 08, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Kewal Singh vs. Tarsem Singh and others
Civil Suit No.16 of 2023
.
08.07.2025 Present: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Atharv
Sharma, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Mr. Aditya Chouhan, Advocate, for defendant No.1.
Mr. Hitesh Kumar, Advocate, for proposed defendants
No.2(i)(a) to 2(i)(c).
OMP(M) No.140 of 2023
Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the
record. r
Defendant No.2(ii)-Charan Dass is stated to have expired
on 09.08.2017. The same is evident from the Death Certificate
appended along with the present application as Annexure A-1.
The suit in the case at hand was filed on 20.03.2023.
It is only when notices were served on the defendants that
the factum of death of Charan Dass, i.e., defendant No.2(ii) came
to the light.
Deceased defendant No.2(ii) is survived by his legal heirs,
details whereof, have been given in Paragraph-2 of the
application, which is in consonance with the details given in copy
of Pariwar Register appended along-with the present application.
In fact, defendant No.2(i) and defendant No.2(iii) are the
legal heirs of deceased Charan Dass, i.e. defendant No.2(ii).
Defendant No.2(i) is the son of deceased Charan Dass and
defendant No.2(iii) is the wife of Charan Dass. The only legal heir
who is to be brought on record is Ms. Jaswinder Kaur, daughter
of deceased Charan Dass.
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Since the wife and son of Charan Dass- deceased
defendant No.2(ii) are already on record as defendant No.2(i) and
.
2(iii), therefore, legal heir-Ms. Jaswinder Kaur, daughter of
deceased defendant No.2(ii)-Charan Dass, is ordered to be
brought on record.
The application stands disposed of. Amended memo of
parties filed with the application is taken on record.
OMP No.914 of 2025
No reply is stated to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicants. The non-applicants have no objection, if in case the
application is allowed and the typographical error which has been
caused in the cause title is ordered to be rectified.
In fact, defendant No.2-Banta had only one legal heir,
namely Charan Dass. Charan Dass died on 09.08.2017. The
legal heirs of Charan Dass in whom the right to sue survives, are
wife-Smt. Sumati , son-Gurdeep and daughter-Jaswinder Kaur.
In view of the aforesaid, present application is allowed.
Henceforth in the cause title, Charan Dass would be reflected as
defendant No.2(i), his wife-Smt. Sumati as defendant No.2(i)(a),
son-Gurdeep as defendant No.2(i)(b) and daughter-Jaswinder
Kaur as defendant No.2(i)(c).
The application stands disposed of. Amended memo of
parties is ordered to be taken on record.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 08, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Chain Singh vs. Rai Singh and another
RSA No.216 of 2021
.
08.07.2025 Present: Mr. Naresh Kaul, Advocate, for the appellant.
Respondent No.1 is stated to have expired.
None for respondent No.2.
CMP No.15011 of 2025
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of non-applicant.
The non-applicant has no objection, if in case the application is
allowed and the name of deceased respondent No.1, i.e. Rai
Singh, is ordered to be deleted from the array of the parties, as is
being sought in the present application.
Respondent No.1 is stated to have died on 05.04.2022. As
per the contents of the application, he is survived by his son, who
is already on record as respondent No.2.
Since the right to sue inheres/survives with the legal heir of
deceased respondent No.1, who is already on record as
respondent No.2, therefore, the present application is allowed
and the name of deceased respondent No.1 is ordered to be
deleted from the array of the parties, subject to just all exceptions.
Amended memo of parties be filed within two weeks.
The application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 08, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Banwari Lal and another vs. Vipan Lal and others
.
RSA No.5 of 2021
08.07.2025 Present: Mr. Sambhav Bhasin, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Sumit Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. B.C. Verma,
Advocate, for all the respondents, except respondent No.3.
Proposed LRs No.3(a) and 3(b) proceeded against ex-
parte vide order dated 05.05.2025.
served.
r to
CMP(M) Nos.375 & 376 of 2025
Proposed legal heirs of deceased respondent No.3 stand
However, there is no appearance on their behalf.
Hence, they were proceeded against ex parte vide order dated
05.05.2025, passed by Additional Registrar (Judicial) of this
Court.
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicants. The non-applicants have no objection, if in case, the
application is allowed and the legal heirs of deceased respondent
No.3 are brought on record as is being sought in the
application(CMP(M) No.375 of 2025).
Respondent No.3 is stated to have expired on 05.02.2022.
Deceased respondent No.3 is survived by his legal heirs, details
whereof, have been given in Paragraph-3 of the application
(CMP(M) No.375 of 2025).
Since the right to sue inheres/survives with the legal heirs
of deceased respondent No.3, detailed in Paragraph-3 of the
application (CMP(M) No.375 of 2025), therefore, they are ordered
to be brought on record.
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
For the bona fide reasons stated/sufficient cause shown
.
in the application (CMP(M) No.376 of 2025), delay in bringing on
the legal heirs of deceased respondent No.3, is condoned and
abatement, if any, is set aside.
The applications stand disposed of. Amended memo of
parties stands filed. The same be taken on record.
RSA No.5 of 2021
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the
newly added respondents, i.e., respondents No.3(a) and 3(b),
returnable within four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 08, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
General Manager, Northern Railways vs. Hari Chand
and another
RFA No.275 of 2019
.
08.07.2025 Present: Mr. Nand Lal Thakur, Senior Panel Counsel, for the
appellant.
Respondent No.1 is stated to have expired.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.2/State.
Learned Senior Panel Counsel appearing on behalf of the
appellant submits that requisite steps for bringing on record the
legal heirs of deceased respondent No.1 shall be taken during the
course of the week.
On taking such steps, issue notice to the proposed legal
heirs of deceased respondent No.1, returnable within four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 08, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Zila Parishad District Kangra at Dharamshala vs.
Baldev Singh and others
.
RSA No.4202 of 2013
08.07.2025 Present: Mr. Devender K. Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Respondent No.18 is stated to have expired.
Ms. Mamta Garg, Advocate, vice Mr. Sanjay Jaswal,
Advocate, for respondents No.12 to 19.
This Court vide order application being CMP No.8815 of
2024, which was disposed of vide order dated 15.06.2024, was
informed about the death of respondent No.18-Rachna Devi.
However, till date no steps have been taken for bringing on
record the legal heirs of deceased respondent No.18. By efflux of
time abatement, in the case at hand, has occurred insofar as
respondent No.18 is concerned.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 08, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Naresh Bala vs. Rama Sharma (deceased) through
LRs.
.
RSA No.4194 of 2013
08.07.2025 Present: Mr. Surjeet, Advocate, vice Mr. Sumit Raj Sharma,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. V.S. Chauhan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vivek
Sharma, Advocate, for the respondents.
CMP No.15126 of 2025
The present application is dismissed as withdrawn. The
application stands disposed of accordingly.
RSA No.4194 of 2013
List for hearing in due course.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 08, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Meer Chand vs. Menhgo Ram (deceased) through LRs.
RSA No.4128 of 2013
.
08.07.2025 Present: Mr. Basant Pal Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
Respondent No.1 is stated to have expired.
Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Atharv
Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.2 to 4.
CMP(M) Nos.372 and 373 of 2025
record.
r to
Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the
Respondent No.1 is stated to have expired on 25.06.2021.
The same is evident from the Death Certificate appended along
with the present application (CMP(M) No.372 of 2025) as
Annexure A-1. Deceased respondent No.1 is survived by his
legal heirs, details whereof, have been given in Paragraph-2 of
the application (CMP(M) No.372 of 2025), which is in consonance
with the details given in Legal Heir Certificate appended along-
with the application (CMP(M) No.372 of 2025). Insofar as legal
heirs, Rajesh, Jitender and Janam Singh, sons of deceased
respondent No.1 are concerned, they are already on record as
respondents No.2, 3 and 4. Therefore, only Smt. Sarla Devi,
widow of deceased respondent No.1-Menhgo Ram, is to be
brought on record as his legal heir.
Since legal heirs, Rajesh, Jitender and Janam Singh, sons
of deceased respondent No.1 are already on record as
respondents No.2, 3 and 4, therefore, legal heir-Smt. Sarla Devi,
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
widow of deceased respondent No.1-Menhgo Ram, is ordered to
.
be brought on record.
For the bona fide reasons stated/sufficient cause shown
in the application (CMP(M) No.373 of 2025), delay in bringing on
the legal heirs of deceased respondent No.1, is condoned and
abatement, if any, is set aside.
The applications stand disposed of. Amended memo of
parties be filed within two weeks.
RSA No.4128 of 2013
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the
newly added respondents, i.e., respondent No.1(a)-Smt. Sarla
Devi, returnable within four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 08, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Roop Chand (deceased) through LRs. and others vs.
Vidya Devi (deceased) through LRs.
RSA No.542 of 2009
.
08.07.2025 Present: Mr. Het Ram Thakur, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Jai Ram Sharma, Advocate, for the respondents.
CMP No.15183 of 2025
For the reasons stated in the application, early hearing of
RSA No.542 of 2009
r to
the appeal is allowed. The application stands disposed of.
List for hearing on 28.08.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 08, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Tejinder Singh vs. Beverley Singh
RFA No.52 of 2025
.
08.07.2025 Present: Mr. Arjun K. Lall, Advocate, for the appellant.
The appeal, in the case at hand has been preferred under
Section 19(1) of the Family Courts Act, 1984. In terms of sub-
Section 6 thereof, appeal preferred under sub-Section 1 of
Section 19 is required to be heard by a Bench consisting of two
or more Judges.
In view of above, at the pleasure of Hon’ble the Chief
Justice, list before appropriate Bench.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 08, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Jitender Kumar @ Jassu vs. State of HP
Cr.MP(M) No.1594 of 2025
.
08.07.2025 Present: Mr. Panku Chaudhary, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
By way of present petition, a prayer for interim bail has
been made by the present petitioner on account of marriage of
his real brother.
Notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate
General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the
respondent-State and seeks time to file status report.
List on 11.07.2025. Status report be filed on or before the
next date of hearing.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 08, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Abhishek Kumar Thakur vs. Ruchi Bala
CMPMO No.113 of 2025
.
08.07.2025 Present: Mr. Y.P. Sood, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner is in arrears of maintenance on account of orders
passed by the Trial Court and modified by the lower Appellate
Court.
Let the arrears of maintenance along-with up-to-date
interest be deposited on or before the next date of hearing. List
on 20.08.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 08, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Sunita Mishra vs. Prem Lata Sharma and others
Civil Revision No.67 of 2025
.
08.07.2025 Present: Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ajeet Pal
Singh Jaswal, Advocate, for the petitioner.
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the
respondents, returnable within four weeks.
July 08, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Kanwar Vijay Singh vs. Akshay Dogar and another
CMPMO No.435 of 2016
.
07.07.2025 Present: Mr. Praveen Chauhan, Advocate, vice Mr. Y.P. Sood,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. R.L. Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rajeev Sood,
Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.2/State.
At the request of learned vice counsel appearing on behalf
of the petitioner, list on 22.07.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 07, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Kanwar Vijay Singh vs. Akshay Dogar and another
CMPMO No.435 of 2016
.
07.07.2025 Present: Mr. Praveen Chauhan, Advocate, vice Mr. Y.P. Sood,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. R.L. Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rajeev Sood,
Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.2/State.
At the request of learned vice counsel appearing on behalf
of the petitioner, list on 22.07.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 07, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Chamera Hydroelectric, NHPC vs. Kaushalya and
others
CMP No.12388 of 2025 in
.
RFA No.84 of 1998
07.07.2025 Present: None for the appellant/non-applicant.
Mr. Pawan Chauhan, Advocate, vice Mr. Bala Nand
Mehta, Advocate, for the respondents/applicants.
CMP No.12388 of 2025
Since no one has appeared on behalf of the non-applicant,
let notice of this application be issued to the non-applicant, on
taking steps within three days, returnable within four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 07, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Union of India vs. Jagat Ram and another
CMP(M) No.1498 of 2024
.
07.07.2025 Present: Mr. Bharat Bhushan, Senior Panel Counsel, for the
applicant/petitioner.
Mr. Maan Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.2/State.
At the request of learned Senior Panel Counsel, list the
matter after three weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 07, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Suresh Kumar and others vs. Santosh and others
Civil Revision No.206 of 2022
.
07.07.2025 Present: Mr. Rakesh Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Pranshul Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
None for respondent No.2.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondents No.3 and 4/State.
As jointly prayed, list on 21.07.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 07, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Pat Ram (deceased) through LR and others vs. Anil
Garg and others
CMPMO No.499 of 2019
.
07.07.2025 Present: Mr. Rakesh Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Sanjeev Kuthiala, Senior Advocate with Ms. Sana Rana,
Advocate, for respondents No.1 and 2.
Mr. O.C. Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.5 and 6.
None for respondents No.3 and 4.
At the request of learned counsel appearing on behalf of
the petitioners, list the matter for consideration after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 07, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Vijaya Gupta and others vs. Kamal Kumar Gupta and
others
RSA No.45 of 2025
.
07.07.2025 Present: Mr. Surya Chauhan, Advocate, for the appellants.
At the request of learned counsel appearing on behalf of
the appellants, in order to enable him to prepare the case, list on
15.07.2025.
July 07, 2025 (KS)
to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Land Acquisition Collector and others vs. Mela Ram
RFA No.175 of 2018
.
07.07.2025 Present: Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
appellants/State.
Mr. Naveen K. Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the respondent/
applicant in CMP No.14984 of 2025.
CMP No.14984 of 2025
No ground for early hearing of the matter is made out, at
this stage. Accordingly, application is dismissed.
RFA No.175 of 2018
List for hearing in due course.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 07, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Shimla Jal Prabandhan Nigam Limited vs. Lagnu Ram
(deceased) through LRs. and others
.
CMP No.14954 of 2025 in RFA No.388 of 2017
07.07.2025 Present: Mr. Hamender Singh Chandel, Advocate, for the
appellant/non-applicant.
Mr. Rajat Kumar, Advocate, vice Mr. Ramesh Chand
Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.1, who is stated to
have expired/applicants in CMP No.14954 of 2025.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondents No.2 and 3/State.
At the request of learned counsel appearing on behalf of
the appellant/non-applicant in order to enable him to have
instructions, list the matter on 11.07.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 07, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Vivek Kumar vs. Labh Singh
RSA No.241 of 2020
.
07.07.2025 Present: Ms. Kusum Chaudhary, Advocate, for the appellant.
Ms. Aditi Rana, Advocate, vice Mr. Munish Dhatwalia,
Advocate, for the respondent.
CMP No.14932 of 2025
No ground for early hearing of the matter is made out, at
this stage. Accordingly, application is dismissed.
RSA No.241 of 2020
List for hearing in due course.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 07, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Ram Saroop (deceased) through LRs. vs. Trilok Singh
and others
.
RSA No.78 of 2009
07.07.2025 Present: Mr. Divya Raj Singh, Advocate, for the appellant.
Respondent No.1 is stated to have expired.
Mr. Harshit Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Janesh Gupta,
Advocate, for respondent No.2.
Name of respondent No.3 stands deleted vide order dated
03.12.2021.
None for respondents No.4, 6 and 7.
Appeal stands abated against respondents No.5, 8 and 9.
CMP No.14892 of 2025
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of non-applicants.
The non-applicants have no objection, if in case the application is
allowed and the name of deceased respondent No.1, i.e. Trilok
Singh, is ordered to be deleted, as is being sought in the present
application.
Respondent No.1 is stated to have died during the
pendency of the appeal. As per the applicant, respondent No.1 is
survived by his legal heir, who is already on record as respondent
No.2. In fact, according to the applicant, respondents No.1 to 3
were the co-plaintiffs. Their interests were common in the joint
property. Respondent No.1 was the brother of respondent No.2
and respondent No.3 was the mother of respondents No.1 and 2.
In view of the aforesaid, present application is allowed.
Name of respondent No.1 is ordered to be deleted from the array
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
of the parties, subject to just all exceptions. Amended memo of
parties be filed within a period of one week.
.
The application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 07, 2025 (KS) Judge
r to
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Virender Singh Dhanta vs. Jitender Singh Kataik @
Lucky Kataik and another
Civil Suit No.145 of 2022
.
07.07.2025 Present: Mr. Vinod Kumar Gupta, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
None for defendant No.1.
Ms. Kiran Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Arvind Sharma,
Advocate, for defendant No.2.
OMP No.905 of 2025
Reply, if any, be filed on or before the next date of hearing.
List on 28.07.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 07, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Shiv Dayal and another vs. Kanshi Ram and others
CMP(M) No.1867/2024 a/w CMP(M) No.2115/2024 in
RSA No.105 of 2012
.
07.07.2025 Present: Mr. R.K. Bawa, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vijay Chaudhary,
Advocate, for the applicants.
Mr. Harshit Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Janesh Gupta,
Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 5.
CMP(M) No.1867 of 2024 and CMP(M) No.2115 of 2024
Pleadings are complete.
At the request of learned vice counsel appearing on behalf
of the non-applicants/respondents No.1 to 5, list for consideration
on 11.08.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 07, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
National Highway Authority of India vs. Ramesh Singh
and others
OMP(M) No.167 of 2024
.
07.07.2025 Present: Ms. Sneh Bhimta, Advocate, vice Ms. Shreya Chauhan,
Advocate, for the applicant-appellant.
Mr. Aditya Chauhan, Advocate, for respondents No.1, 3 to
5, 6(i) to 6(iii), 7 to 9.
Respondent No.2 is stated to have expired.
Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant
submits that an application for bringing on record the legal heirs
of deceased respondent No.2, post preparation has been sent for
signatures to the Project Director at Mandi, however, the said
Project Director was not available on account of ongoing relief
operations at Mandi which have been occasioned on account of
incessant rains in District Mandi.
In view thereof, let the application for bringing on record
the legal heirs of respondent No.2 be filed within four weeks. List
thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 07, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Banti Devi and another vs. Mansa Ram and others
Civil Suit No.18 of 2024
.
07.07.2025 Present: Mr. G.D. Verma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sumit Sharma,
Advocate, for the plaintiffs.
Mr. Y.P. Sood, Advocate, for the defendants.
List for admission/denial of the documents before the
Registrar concerned, on 04.08.2025.
July 07, 2025 (KS)
to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Gian Chand and others vs. Baldev Ram (now
deceased) through LRs.
CMP(M) No.1027 of 2023 in RSA No.32 of 2014
.
07.07.2025 Present: Mr. Sohail Khan, Advocate, vice Mr. Rakesh Chauhan,
Advocate, for the applicants/appellants.
Ms. Ranjana Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Vikas Rathore,
Advocate, for the respondents.
Pleadings are complete. In terms of order dated
2014 for final hearing.
r to
13.09.2024, list the present application along-with RSA No.32 of
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 07, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Madhu Bala vs. Kumari Megha and another
CMPMO No.342 of 2023
.
07.07.2025 Present: Mr. Karan Singh Kanwar, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Bhupinder Singh Kanwar, Advocate, for the
respondents.
CMP No.15107 of 2025
The present application seeking placing on record certain
r to
documents is dismissed as at the time of passing of the
impugned order in question these documents do not exist before
the Trial Court or the First Appellate Court. The application
stands disposed of.
CMPMO No.342 of 2023
Vide separate judgment of the even date, present petition
stands disposed of, so also, pending miscellaneous
application(s), if any.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 07, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Chander Mohan and others vs. The Principal Secretary
(Power) to the Government of Himachal Pradesh
CMP(M) No.39 of 2025
.
04.07.2025 Present: Ms. Shashi Kiran, Advocate, for the applicants.
Mr. R.P. Singh, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents
No.1 and 3/State.
Mr. Hamender Singh Chandel, Advocate, for respondents
No.2 and 4.
CMP(M) No.1839 of 2025
By way of present application, delay of 257 days in filing
the present appeal is being sought to be condoned. Admittedly,
in the case at hand, appeal against the impugned award dated
21.02.2024 is to be filed under Section 74 of the Right to Fair
Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition,
Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter for the
purpose of brevity referred to “the Act). Section 74 of the Act
reads as under:-
“(1) The Requiring Body or any person aggrieved by the
Award passed by an Authority under section 69 may file an
appeal to the High Court within sixty days from the date of
Award:
Provided that the High Court may, if it is satisfied
that the appellant was prevented by sufficient cause from
filing the appeal within the said period, allow it to be filed
within a further period not exceeding sixty days.
(2) Every appeal referred to under sub-section (1) shall
be heard as expeditiously as possible and endeavour shall
be made to dispose of such appeal within six months from
the date on which the appeal is presented to the High Court.
Explanation. – For the purposes of this section, “High Court”
means the High Court within the jurisdiction of which the
land acquired or proposed to be acquired is situated.”
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
In terms of the provisions of Section 74 of the Act, appeal
has to be preferred within 60 days from the date of award.
.
However, in terms of proviso to Section 74(1) of the Act, on
showing sufficient cause, appeal can be filed within further period
not exceeding 60 days. Since, in the case at hand, delay beyond
the prescribed period of 120 days in terms of Section 74 of the
Act is being sought to be condoned, therefore, sustenance is
being sought of Section 29(2) of the Limitation Act. The same is
being reproduced herein below:-
“29(2) Where any special or local law prescribes for any
suit, appeal or application a period of limitation different fromthe period prescribed by the Schedule, the provisions of
section 3 shall apply as if such period were the period
prescribed by the Schedule and for the purpose ofdetermining any period of limitation prescribed for any suit,
appeal or application by any special or local law, the
provisions contained in sections 4 to 24 (inclusive) shallapply only in so far as, and to the extent to which, they are
not expressly excluded by such special or local law.”
The 2013 Act came into force w.e.f 14.09.2015 and the
award passed in the present case on 8.10.2014. Thus, the award
came to be passed subsequent to the 2013 Act came into force,
thereby automatically the provisions of Section 24 (1)(a)of the
2013 Act are applicable. Once the SLAO determines the
compensation under the 2013 Act, the aggrieved party may
request the authority to make reference to the authority as
contemplated under Section under Section 64.of the 2013 Act for
determination of market value for the acquired land. Once the
reference authority determines the compensation under section
69, then the aggrieved party has to file an appeal under section
74 of the 2013 Act within the time stipulated.
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
On an analysis of the section, it is clear that the provisions
of Sections 4 to 24 will apply when:
.
(i) there is a special or local law which prescribes a different
period of limitation for any suit, appeal or application; and
(ii) the special or local law does not expressly exclude those
sections.
There is no dispute that the Act is a “special law” and that
Section 74 provides for a period of limitation different from that
prescribed under the Limitation Act. The question then is – is such
exclusion expressed in Section 34 of the Act?
It is not essential for the special or local law to, in terms,
exclude the provisions of the Limitation Act. It is sufficient if on a
consideration of the language of its provisions relating to
limitation, the intention to exclude can be necessarily implied.
Another very important aspect of the case is that 60 days
is the period of limitation, and a further period not exceeding 60
days is provided only if sufficient cause is made out for filing the
appeal within the extended period. Applicability of Section 5 of
the Limitation Act would render otiose the second time-limit of 60
days, which, in my considered view is peremptory in nature.
Reference can be made to the decision of the Hon’ble
High Court of Bombay, passed in Municipal Corporation of
Greater Mumbai Vs. Anusaya Sitaram Devrukhkar and Ors.,
on 07.01.2025, in Interim Application No.13254 of 2024 in First
Appeal(St.) No.24058 of 2024 and decision dated 21.10.2022,
passed by the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka in Review
Petititon No.328 of 2021, title Deputy Commissioner and
Special Land…..Vs. M/s S V Global Mill Limited.
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
In view of the foregoing discussion, I have no hesitation in
holding that beyond the total period of 120 days as stipulated in
.
Section 74(1) [read with its proviso] of the
2013 Act, this Court has no power to condone the delay. Since,
admittedly in the facts of the present case, the application
[seeking condonation of delay] filed by the Appellant is beyond
the total period of 120 days, the application seeking a
condonation of delay is hereby dismissed.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 04, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
The General Manager, NTPC Kol Dam vs. Pawan
Kumar and another a/w connected matters
RFA No.67 of 2014 a/w RFA Nos.68 to 73 of 2024
.
04.07.2025 Present: Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Pranjal
Munjal, Advocate, for the appellant(s).
Mr. Mukesh Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Rajiv Rai,
Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Sushil Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent No.2 in
RFA No.73 of 2014.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondents No.2 to 6/State.
List on 08.07.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 04, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Jaswinder Singh vs. Kashmir Singh and others
CMPMO No.632 of 2024
.
04.07.2025 Present: Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondents No.2 to 6/State.
At the request of learned counsel for the petitioner, list on
07.07.2025.
July 04, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Devi Singh and others vs. Ramki Devi and another
RSA No.245 of 2004
.
04.07.2025 Present: Mr. Sanjeev Kuthiala, Senior Advocate with Ms. Sana
Rana, Advocate, for all the appellants, except appellant
No.2(a), whose name stands deleted.
Respondent No.1 is stated to have expired.
None for respondent No.2.
Respondent No.1 is stated to have expired. Let
consequential steps for bringing on record her legal heirs be
taken within four weeks. List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 04, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Union of India vs. Bantu Devi and another
CMP(M) No.1228 of 2023 & CMP No.13056 of 2023 in
RFA No.311 of 2007
.
04.07.2025 Present: None for the applicant/Union of India.
None for respondent No.1.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.2/State.
Despite repeated calls, there is no appearance on behalf
list after two weeks.
r to
of the applicant and respondent No.1. In the interest of justice,
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 04, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Karam Singh vs. Shri Ram and another
CMPMO No.161 of 2022
.
04.07.2025 Present: Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Suri, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Sanjay Dalmia, Advocate, for the respondent.
At the request of learned counsel for the petitioner, list on
10.07.2025.
July 04, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
National Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Kamlesh
(deceased) through LRs. and others
CMPMO No.149 of 2022
.
04.07.2025 Present: Ms. Devyani Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Anirudh
Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Neeraj Sharma and Mr. Ishan Kashyap, Advocates, for
respondent No.7.
Notice not issued to respondents No.1 to 6.
List on 11.07.2025.
Henceforth, names of Mr. Neeraj Sharma and Mr. Ishan
Kashyap, learned Advocates be reflected in the cause list as
counsel for respondent No.7.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 04, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Vijay Kumar Sood vs. Parkasho Devi and others
a/w connected matters
Civil Revision No.185 of 2018 a/w
.
Civil Revision No.216 of 2015, Civil Revision
Nos.58, 74 and 75 of 2016
Civil Revision No.185 of 2018, Civil Revision
No.216 of 2015 and Civil Revision No.58 of 2016
04.07.2025 Present: Mr. Sumit Sood, Advocate, for the petitioner(s).
Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 5.
Mr. Ashok Sood, Senior Advocate with Ms. Pooja Verma,
Advocate, for respondents No.6 to 8.
Civil Revision Nos.74 and 75 of 2016
Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner(s).
Mr. Rohit Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. Sumit Sood,
Advocate, for the respondent(s).
List on 28.07.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 04, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
M/s Modgil Construction and others vs. Vinod Kumar
Shandil and others a/w connected matter
RSA No.52 of 2025 a/w RSA No.53 of 2025
.
RSA No.52 of 2025
04.07.2025 Present: None for the appellants.
Mr. Naresh Kumar Gupta, Advocate, for respondents No.1
and 4.
Mr. Vijay Kumar Verma, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
RSA No.53 of 2025
None for the appellants.
Mr. Naresh Kumar Gupta, Advocate, for respondents No.1
and 2.
Mr. Vijay Kumar Verma, Advocate, for respondent No.4.
RSA No.52 of 2025
Mr. Naresh Kumar Gupta and Mr. Vijay Kumar Verma,
learned Advocates have put in appearance on behalf of
respondents No.1 & 4 and respondent No.3, respectively.
On taking steps within three days, let notice be issued to
respondent No.2, returnable within four weeks.
RSA No.53 of 2025
Mr. Naresh Kumar Gupta and Mr. Vijay Kumar Verma,
learned Advocates have put in appearance on behalf of
respondents No.1 & 2 and respondent No.4, respectively.
On taking steps within three days, let notice be issued to
respondent No.3, returnable within four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 04, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
M/s Modgil Construction and others vs. Vinod Kumar
Shandil and others a/w connected matter
RSA No.52 of 2025 a/w RSA No.53 of 2025
.
RSA No.52 of 2025
04.07.2025 Present: None for the appellants.
Mr. Naresh Kumar Gupta, Advocate, for respondents No.1
and 4.
Mr. Vijay Kumar Verma, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
RSA No.53 of 2025
None for the appellants.
Mr. Naresh Kumar Gupta, Advocate, for respondents No.1
and 2.
Mr. Vijay Kumar Verma, Advocate, for respondent No.4.
RSA No.52 of 2025
Mr. Naresh Kumar Gupta and Mr. Vijay Kumar Verma,
learned Advocates have put in appearance on behalf of
respondents No.1 & 4 and respondent No.3, respectively.
On taking steps within three days, let notice be issued to
respondent No.2, returnable within four weeks.
RSA No.53 of 2025
Mr. Naresh Kumar Gupta and Mr. Vijay Kumar Verma,
learned Advocates have put in appearance on behalf of
respondents No.1 & 2 and respondent No.4, respectively.
On taking steps within three days, let notice be issued to
respondent No.3, returnable within four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 04, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Abhishek Kumar Thakur vs. Ruchi Bala
CMPMO No.113 of 2025
.
04.07.2025 Present: Mr. Y.P. Sood, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner
submits that in pursuance to order dated 27.03.2025, an
appropriate application for placing on record the order-sheets
stands filed. However, the same is not on record.
Registry to trace the application so filed and place it on
record well before the next date of hearing, post removal of
objection(s), if any.
List on 08.07.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 04, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:30 :::CIS
Rattani Devi vs. Kamla Devi and others
CMP(M) No.27 of 2025
.
04.07.2025 Present: Mr. Raman Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Parmod Singh
Thakur, Advocate, for the applicant/appellant.
CMP(M) No.27 of 2025
Though served, however there is no appearance on behalf
of the respondents.
pleadings.
r to
Heard counsel for the applicant and perused the
For the sufficient reasons and cause shown in the
application, delay of 8 days in filing the present appeal, is
condoned. The application stands disposed of.
RSA No.______of 2025
Be registered.
List for admission after two weeks.
CMP No._______of 2025
Be registered.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 04, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Lekh Raj vs. Tirath Ram (deceased) through LRs.
CMP(M) No.893 of 2024
.
04.07.2025 Present: Mr. Arush Matlotia, Advocate, for the applicant/appellant.
Mr. Vijay Kumar, Advocate, vice Mr. Sanjeev Kumari Suri,
Advocate, for respondents No.1(i) to 1(iii).
Time for filing reply is being sought since 27.08.2024. Let
the same be filed on or before the next date of hearing. List on
11.07.2025.
However, it is made clear that if reply is not filed on or
before the next date of hearing, then the right to file the same
shall stand closed without further reference to this Court.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 04, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Bhagwan Dass and another vs. Babu Ram
CMPMO No.133 of 2024
.
04.07.2025 Present: Mr. Raman Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Vinod Kumar
Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Vivek Singh Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. Mukul Sood,
Advocate, for the respondent.
Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of the
petitioners submits that learned original counsel is not available
today on account of personal difficulty.
r He seeks an
adjournment. Prayer not opposed.
As prayed, list after six weeks. It is made clear that mere
pendency of the present petition would not preclude the trial
Court from proceeding further with the lis, from where the present
proceedings have arisen.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 04, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Dhani Ram @ Dhanu vs. Bandi Devi
CMPMO No.68 of 2021
.
04.07.2025 Present: Mr. H.S. Rangra, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms. Seema K. Guleria, Advocate, for the respondent.
At the request of learned counsel for the petitioner, list
next week.
July 04, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Inder Singh and others vs. Narayan Singh and another
CMPMO No.472 of 2020
.
04.07.2025 Present: None for the parties.
At the pleasure of Hon’ble the Chief Justice, list before
another appropriate Bench.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 04, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Malook Singh vs. Subhash Chand
RSA No.143 of 2012
.
04.07.2025 Present: Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocate, for the proposed legal heirs
of appellant/applicants.
Mr. Atharv Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent.
CMP(M) No.728 of 2025
Proposed legal heirs of deceased appellant stand served.
Mr. Janesh Gupta, learned counsel has put in appearance and
Reply stands filed.
r to
has filed power of attorney on their behalf.
Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the
pleadings.
The sole appellant is stated to have expired on
29.10.2024, a fact which is evident from the Death Certificate
appended along-with present application. Deceased sole
appellant is survived by his legal heirs, details whereof have been
given in PMalookaragraph-2 of the present application.
Since the right to sue inheres/survives with the legal heirs
of deceased sole appellant, detailed in Paragraph-2 of the
application, therefore, they are ordered to be brought on record.
For the bona fide reasons stated/ sufficient cause shown in
the present application, delay in bringing on record the legal heirs
of deceased sole appellant, is condoned and abatement, if any, is
set aside.
The application stands disposed of. Amended memo of
parties be filed within two weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 04, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Bhago and others vs. Gianoo and others a/w
connected matter
RSA Nos.267 and 268 of 2009
.
04.07.2025 Present: Mr. Digvijay Singh Bisht, Advocate, vice Mr. B.C. Verma,
Advocate, for the appellants, in both the appeals.
None for the respondents, in both the appeals.
Mr. Ashwani Dhiman, Advocate, for the non-applicants/
respondents in CMP No.14408 of 2021.
CMP No.6144 of 2025 in RSA No.267 of 2009
The substantial question of law framed in the present
application shall be considered at an appropriate stage. The
application stands disposed of.
CMP No.6145 of 2025 in RSA No.268 of 2009
Rejoinder, if any, be filed within four weeks. List
thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 04, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
LAC, HPPWD, Solan and others vs. Dropati (deceased)
through LRs. and others
RFA No.183 of 2007
.
04.07.2025 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
appellants/State.
Ms. Ritu, Advocate, vice Mr. Mohan Singh, Advocate, for
respondents No.1(a), 1(iv), 1(b)(v), 1(b)(ix) to 1(b)(xvi), 1(a)(i)
(a), 1(a)(v)(c) to 1(a)(v)(e).
None for respondents No.1(b)(vi)(a) to 1(b)(vi)(c).
None for respondents No.2(a), 2(c), 4(d) and 11(a)(ii) to 11(a)
(v).
CMP(M) No.756 & 757 of 2025
Proposed legal heirs of deceased respondent No.10 stand
served. However, there is no appearance on their behalf.
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicants. The non-applicants have no objection, if in case, the
application is allowed and the legal heirs of deceased respondent
No.10 are brought on record as is being sought in the
application(CMP(M) No.756 of 2025).
Respondent No.10 is stated to have expired on
15.07.2024. The same is evident from the Death Certificate
appended along with the present application (CMP(M) No.756 of
2025) as Annexure A-1. Deceased respondent No.10 is survived
by his legal heirs, details whereof, have been given in Paragraph-
5 of the present application (CMP(M) No.756 of 2025) which is in
consonance with the details given in Legal Heir Certificate issued
by the Village Revenue Officer, Patwar Circle, Dehun, Tehsil and
District Solan.
Since the right to sue inheres/survives with the legal heirs
of deceased respondent No.10, detailed in Paragraph-5 of the
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
application (CMP(M) No.756 of 2025), therefore, they are ordered
.
to be brought on record.
For the bona fide reasons stated/sufficient cause shown
in the application (CMP(M) No.757 of 2025), delay in bringing on
the legal heirs of deceased respondent No.10, is condoned and
abatement, if any, is set aside.
The applications stand disposed of. Amended memo of
parties stand filed. The same be taken on record.
RSA No.183 of 2007
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the
newly added respondents, i.e., respondents No.10(a) to 10(g),
returnable within four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 04, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Surinder Pal Singh vs. Pushpa and others
RFA No.346 of 2005
.
04.07.2025 Present: Mr. Digvijay Singh Bisht, Advocate, vice Mr. B.C. Verma,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. M.L. Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 6.
Respondent No.7 is stated to have expired.
Mr. Ajay Kumar Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.9.
Proposed LR No.7(c)(i) proceeded against ex parte vide
order dated 30.12.2024.
CMP No.20942 of 2024
In view of order dated 05.05.2025, the present application
has become infructuous. The application stands disposed of
accordingly.
CMP(M) No.1778 of 2024
Despite service, there is no appearance on behalf of the
proposed legal heir of deceased respondent No.7(b) detailed in
Paragraph-1 of the application has not put in appearance.
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicants. The non-applicants have no objection, if in case, the
application is allowed and the legal heir of deceased respondent
No.7(b), is brought on record as is being sought in the
application.
Respondent No.7(b) is stated to have expired on
08.08.2022. The same is evident from the Death Certificate
appended along with the present application as Annexure A-1.
Deceased respondent No.7(b) is survived by his legal heir, details
whereof, have been given in Paragraph-1 of the present
application.
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
.
Since the right to sue inheres/survives with the legal heir of
deceased respondent No.7(b), detailed in Paragraph-1 of the
application, therefore, she is ordered to be brought on record.
The same is taken on record.
The application stands disposed of. Amended memo of
parties be also filed within four weeks.
CMP(M) No.1779 of 2024
Despite service, there was no appearance on behalf of the
proposed legal heir of deceased respondent No.7(c) detailed in
Paragraph-1 of the application, on 30.12.2024. Hence, she was
proceeded against ex parte.
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicants. The non-applicants have no objection, if in case, the
application is allowed and the legal heir of deceased respondent
No.7(c), is brought on record as is being sought in the application.
Respondent No.7(c) is stated to have expired on
17.12.2012. Deceased respondent No.7(c) is survived by his
legal heir, details whereof, have been given in Paragraph-1 of the
present application.
Since the right to sue inheres/survives with the legal heir of
deceased respondent No.7(c), detailed in Paragraph-1 of the
application, therefore, she is ordered to be brought on record.
The same is taken on record.
The application stands disposed of. Amended memo of
parties be also filed within four weeks.
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
.
RFA No.346 of 2005
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the
newly added respondents, i.e., respondent No.7(b)(i) and 7(c)(i),
returnable within four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 04, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Prem Singh Negi vs. Shambhu Prasad Purohit
Civil Revision No.66 of 2025
.
04.07.2025 Present: Ms. Shrutika Chauhan, Advocate, vice Mr. Dheeraj K.
Vashisht, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Civil Revision No.66/2025 and CMP No.14962 of 2025
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the
respondent, returnable within four weeks.
July 04, 2025 (KS)
to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Jagdish Chand vs. Ramesh Aggarwal
RSA No.174 of 2021
.
03.07.2025 Present: Mr. Vishal Verma, Advocate, vice Mr. Rajesh Kumar
Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. P.S. Goverdhan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rakesh
Thakur, Advocate, for the respondent.
As jointly prayed, list after six weeks.
July 03, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Kaushalya Devi vs. Usha Verma and others
RSA No.219 of 2020
.
03.07.2025 Present: Mr. Vishwas Kaushal, Advocate, vice Mr. Vivek Negi,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Ms. Sana Rana, Advocate, for respondents No.1 and 2.
Mr. Romesh Verma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sumit
Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
Amended memo of parties is stated to have been filed
today itself in the Registry.
At the request of learned vice counsel for the appellant, list
for consideration after six weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 03, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Kanshi Ram and others vs. Jaram Singh and others
CMPMO No.245 of 2024
.
03.07.2025 Present: Mr. Goldy Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. R.L. Chaudhary, Advocate, for the respondents.
CMPMO No.245 of 2024
Mere pendency of the present petition would not preclude
the trial Court from proceeding further with the lis, from where the
present proceedings, have arisen.
List after six weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 03, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Tara Devi vs. Vikas Sharma and another
RSA No.243 of 2024
.
03.07.2025 Present: Mr. P.S. Goverdhan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rakesh
Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Parveen Chauhan, Advocate, vice Mr. Sanjay Prashar,
Advocate, for respondent No.1.
None for respondent No.2.
CMP No.5779 of 2025
Heard counsel for the parties.
During the pendency of the present proceedings, status
quo qua nature and possession of the suit land be maintained.
The application stands disposed of.
RSA No.243 of 2024
List for consideration at the admission stage after six
weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 03, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Daya Ram vs. Jyoti Prasad
RSA No.234 of 2024
.
03.07.2025 Present: Mr. Aman Thakur, Advocate, vice Ms. Kusum Chaudhary,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Vinod Chauhan, Advocate, for the respondent.
Further time prayed to inspect the record. List after four
weeks.
r ( Bipin C. Negi )
July 03, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Hamir Chand vs. Jai Prakash
RSA No.199 of 2024
.
03.07.2025 Present: Ms. Reeta Hingmang, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Mukul Sood, Advocate, for the respondent.
As jointly prayed, list after six weeks.
July 03, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Municipal Corporation Shimla vs. M/s Akar Enterprises
Civil Revision No.80 of 2020
.
03.07.2025 Present: Mr. Mukul Sood, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms. Drishti Sirswal, Advocate, vice Mr. Balwant Kukreja,
Advocate, for the respondent.
CMP No.4992 of 2025 Rejoinder, if any, be filed within four weeks. List thereafter. r ( Bipin C. Negi ) July 03, 2025 (KS) Judge ::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Kaushalya Devi vs. Collector Land Acquisition and others
Civil Revision No.74 of 2020
.
03.07.2025 Present: Mr. Sunil Mohan Goel, Senior Advocate with Mr. Raman
Jamalta, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondents No.1 & 3-State.
Ms. Sneh Bhimta, Advocate, vice Ms. Shreya Chauhan,
Advocate, for respondents No.2 & 4.
Let order dated 28.05.2025 be complied with on or before
the next date of hearing. List on 19.08.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 03, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Sheela Devi and another vs. Ram Chand
CMPMO No.364 of 2018
.
03.07.2025 Present: Mr. Goldy Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Ms. Meenakshi Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent.
At the request of learned counsel for the respondent, list
for consideration on 10.07.2025.
July 03, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Sudesh Raj (deceased) through LR vs. Pushpa
Kaushal and another
CMPMO No.762 of 2019
.
03.07.2025 Present: Mr. Ashok Kumar Tyagi, Advocate, vice Mr. Pawan
Gautam, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Lakshay Parihar, Advocate, for the respondents.
Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner
submits that learned original counsel is not available today on
account of personal difficulty. He seeks an adjournment. Prayer
not opposed.
As prayed, list after two weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 03, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Gian Chand Taank vs. Anjali and others
CMPMO No.152 of 2018
.
03.07.2025 Present: Mr. Karan Singh Kanwar, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Ashok Kumar Tyagi, Advocate, for respondents No.1,
2, 4 and 5.
None for respondent No.3.
Further time prayed on behalf of the petitioner to comply
week. List thereafter.
r to
with order dated 03.06.2025. Let the same be done within a
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 03, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
M/s Naziveedu Seed Limited vs. Thakur Bhagat and
others
CMP No.11879 of 2025 in
.
RFA No.267 of 2017
03.07.2025 Present: Mr. Anuj Gupta, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Ashwani Negi, Advocate, for respondent
No.1/applicant in CMP No.11879 of 2025.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for
respondents No.2 and 3/State.
r to
CMP No.11879 of 2025
By virtue of the present application, a direction is being
sought by applicant No.1 from this Court qua non-applicant/
appellant to deposit the balance compensation amount in terms
of judgment passed by this Court in RFA No.267 of 2017 and
other connected matters, on 11.10.2023.
Suffice it to say that qua the balance amount, if any, as is
being pleaded in the present application, the applicant always has
a remedy to file an appropriate execution petition.
In view thereof, present application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 03, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Sumit @ Shanky vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Cr.MP(M) No.1289 of 2025
.
03.07.2025 Present: Ms. Deeksha Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
ASI Ranjit Singh I/O Police Station, Dharampur, District
Solan, Himachal Pradesh, is present along-with record.
Status report stands filed. The same is taken on record.
Copy, whereof, has been supplied to learned counsel for the
petitioner, who intends to go through the same.
From the bare perusal of the status report, it is evident that
the matter is coming up before learned Sessions Court, on
19.07.2025 for recording of evidence of three witnesses qua
supplementary Challan filed in the case at hand.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that statements
of all the other witnesses qua the main Challan have been
recorded. In view thereof, list the matter for consideration on
24.07.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 03, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Amit and another vs. Ajudhiya Devi and others
CMP(M) No.1072 of 2025
.
03.07.2025 Present: Ms. Radhika Gautam, Advocate, for the
applicants/appellants.
CMP No.14744 of 2025
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is
allowed. The delay in re-filing the appeal, is condoned. The
application stands disposed of.
CMP(M) No.1072 of 2025
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the
respondents, returnable within four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 03, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
State of HP and others vs. Satya Pal
CMP(M) No.651 of 2025
.
03.07.2025 Present: Mr. Manish Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for the
applicants-appellants.
Ms. Meera Devi, Advocate, vice Mr. Deepak Gupta,
Advocate, for the respondent.
CMP(M) No.651 of 2025
In filing of the present appeal, there is a delay of 78 days.
The same has been duly explained in the application filed for
condonation of delay. Even otherwise, while dealing with an
application for condonation of delay filed by the State, one has to be
conscious of the bureaucratic delays, impersonal nature of the
governmental functioning, institutional interest and hence a justice
oriented liberal approach has to be taken while dealing with such
applications.
In this respect, it would be appropriate to refer to decision of
the Hon’ble Apex Court passed in State of Manipur and others vs.
Koting Lamkang, 2019 (10) SCC 408. The relevant extract of the
same is being reproduced herein below:-
“7. But while concluding as above, it was necessary for
the Court to also be conscious of the bureaucratic delay
and the slow pace in reaching a government decision and
the routine way of deciding whether the State should
prefer an appeal against a judgment adverse to it. Even
while observing that the law of limitation would harshly
affect the party, the Court felt that the delay in the appeal
filed by the State, should not be condoned. against a
judgment adverse to it. Even while observing that the law
of limitation would harshly affect the party, the Court felt
that the delay in the appeal filed by the State, should not
be condoned.
8. Regard should be had in similar such circumstances to
the impersonal nature of the Government’s functioning
where individual officers may fail to act responsibly. This::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
in turn, would result in injustice to the institutional interest.
of the State. If the appeal filed by State are lost for
individual default, those who are at fault, will not usually
be individually affected.”
Other than the aforesaid, it would also be appropriate to refer
to judgment dated 09.10.2023, passed in Civil Appeal No.5867 of
2015 titled Sheo Raj Singh (deceased) through LRs. and others
vs. Union of India and another. The relevant extract of the same is
being reproduced herein below:-.
“37. Having bestowed serious consideration to the rival
contentions, we feel that the High Court’s decision to
condone the delay on account of the first respondent’s
inability to present the appeal within time, for the reasonsassigned therein, does not suffer from any error
warranting interference. As the aforementioned
judgments have shown, such an exercise of discretiondoes, at times, call for a liberal and justice- oriented
approach by the Courts, where certain leeway could beprovided to the State. The hidden forces that are at work
in preventing an appeal by the State being presented
within the prescribed period of limitation so as not to allowa higher court to pronounce upon the legality and validity
of an order of a lower court and thereby secure unholy
gains, can hardly be ignored. Impediments in the working
of the grand scheme of governmental functions have to
be removed by taking a pragmatic view on balancing of
the competing interests.”
Hence, for the reasons/sufficient cause stated in the
application & the aforesaid position of law, delay in filing the present
appeal is condoned. The application stands disposed of.
RFA No.______/2025
Be registered.
List for admission after eight weeks.
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
CMP No._____of 2025
.
Be registered.
During the pendency of the appeal, operation and
execution of impugned judgment dated 30.09.2024, passed by
learned District Judge (Forests), Shimla, District Shimla, shall
remain stayed, subject to deposit of the entire awarded amount
along-with up-to-date interest accrued thereupon, within a period
of eight weeks.
The application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 03, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Ramesh Kumar Goel vs. Lambda Televentures (P) Ltd.
Civil Suit No.24 of 2025
.
03.07.2025 Present: Mr. Ajay Kumar Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rohit,
Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Mr. Kartik Kumar, Advocate, for defendants No.1 and 2.
Mr. Sahil Dixit, Advocate, vice Mr. Vedhant Ranta,
Advocate, for defendant No.3.
Mr. Tek Chand Sharma, Advocate, for defendant No.4.
r to
Learned counsel for the plaintiff submits that the matter
interse the parties has been settled. He seeks time to place on
record the compromise so entered into between the parties.
List on 14.07.2025. Interim order dated 02.06.2025 to
continue.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 03, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
State of Himachal Pradesh vs. Naginder and others
CMP(M) No.1642 of 2024
.
03.07.2025 Present: Mr. R.P. Singh, Deputy Advocate General, for the
applicant-appellant/State.
Further time prayed to comply with order dated
19.06.2025, passed by Additional Registrar(Judicial) of this Court.
Let the needful be done within four weeks. Insofar as
r to
service of respondent No.6(d) is concerned, let steps for his
service be taken within a week. On taking such steps, issue
notice to the said respondent, returnable within four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 03, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Gurnam Singh and others vs. LAC and others
CMP(M) No.1086 of 2024
.
03.07.2025 Present: Mr. Ranbir Singh, Advocate, vice Mr. O.C. Sharma,
Advocate, for the applicants.
Mr. R.P. Singh, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents
No.1 to 3/State.
Mr. Pawan K. Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Rishi Tandon,
Advocate, for respondents No.4(a) to 4(d).
CMP(M) No.1086 of 2024
Amended memo of parties is stated to have been filed.
However, the same is not on record. If in order, let the same be
placed on record.
Heard counsel for the parties. Perused the pleadings.
For the sufficient reasons and cause shown in the
application, delay of 72 days in filing the present appeal, is
condoned. The application stands disposed of.
RFA No._________of 2025
Be registered.
Notice. Mr. R.P. Singh, learned Deputy Advocate General
and Mr. Pawan K. Sharma, learned counsel, appear and waive
service of notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3 and
respondents No.4(a) to 4(d), respectively.
Admit.
Call for the records.
List for hearing in due course.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 03, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
National Highway Authority of India vs. Sukh Ram and
others
OMP(M) No.247 of 2024
.
03.07.2025 Present: Ms. Sneh Bhimta, Advocate, vice Ms. Shreya Chauhan,
Advocate, for the applicant.
Mr. Sanket Sankhyan, Advocate, for respondents No.1
and 3.
Respondent No.2 is stated to have expired.
r to
Further time prayed for bringing on record the legal heirs
of deceased respondent No.2.
Let the needful be done within three weeks. List
thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 03, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
National Highway Authority of India vs. Sada Ram and
others
OMP(M) No.246 of 2024
.
03.07.2025 Present: Ms. Sneh Bhimta, Advocate, vice Ms. Shreya Chauhan,
Advocate, for the applicant.
Mr. Sanket Sankhyan, Advocate, for respondents No.1
and 2.
Respondent No.3 is stated to have expired.
r to
Further time prayed for bringing on record the legal heirs
of deceased respondent No.3.
Let the needful be done within three weeks. List
thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 03, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Raghav Kuthiala and another vs. Sarita Bhateja and
others
Civil Suit No.32 of 2024
.
03.07.2025 Present: Mr. Ashok Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rajat,
Advocate, for the plaintiffs.
Ms. Meera Devi, Advocate, vice Mr. Deepak Gupta,
Advocate, for defendant No.1.
Mr. Dibender Ghosh, Advocate, for defendants No.2 to 6.
OMP No.37 of 2025
Pleadings are complete.
OMP No.393 of 2024
Rejoinder be filed within four weeks.
OMP No.28 of 2025
Rejoinder is stated to have been filed on behalf of the
applicants. However, the same is not on record.
Registry to trace the rejoinder so filed and place it on
record well before the next date of hearing, post removal of
objection(s), if any.
To be considered along-with OMP No.37 of 2025. List
after four weeks.
OMP No.903 of 2025
Reply, if any, be filed on behalf of the non-applicants within
four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 03, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Shyam Murari (deceased) through LRs. vs. Yogesh
Kumar and others
CMP(M) No.1076 of 2023 in RSA No.223 of 2012
.
03.07.2025 Present: Mr. Ashok K. Tyagi, Advocate, vice Mr. Sanjeev K. Suri,
Advocate, for the applicants/appellants.
Respondent No.1 is stated to have expired.
None for respondent-Bank No.2.
Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of the
applicants submits that dispute, in the case at hand, is inter se
the family members and there is every likelihood of an amicable
settlement being arrived at between them in near future.
According to him, there are talks going on inter se the parties.
In view thereof, list the matter after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 03, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Ashish Kumar vs. Shifali Dhiman a/w connected
matter
.
CMPMO No.641 of 2023 & CMPMO No.12 of 2024
03.07.2025 Present: Ms. Ananya Verma, Advocate, vice Mr. Sunny Modgill,
Advocate, for the petitioners, in both the petitions.
None for the respondent, in CMPMO No.641 of 2023.
Mr. Sanjeev Kuthiala, Senior Advocate with Ms. Sana Rana,
Advocate, for the respondent in CMPMO No.12 of 2024.
The matter is being listed after August, 2024. At the joint
request of learned counsel for the parties, list on 21.07.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 03, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Raj Kumar vs. The Kangra Central Cooperative Bank
RSA No.118 of 2020
.
03.07.2025 Present: Mr. Ganesh Barowalia, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Anshuman Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. Rakesh Kumar
Thakur, Advocate, for the respondent.
Admitted on the following substantial question of law:-
Whether reliance placed by both the Courts on the
statements of accounts- Ex.DW1/A is bad in law on
account of non compliance of conditions contained in
Section 2A of the Bankers’ Book of Evidence Act, 1894,insofar as Ex.DW1/A is concerned?
Records be called for.
List for hearing in due course.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 03, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Rakesh Plah vs. Mahesh Raj
CMPMO No.497 of 2024
.
02.07.2025 Present: Mr. J.P. Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Rahil Mahajan, Advocate, for the respondent.
CMP No.14923 of 2025
No reply is intended to the filed on behalf of the non-
applicant/petitioner. The non-applicant has no objection, if in
case the documents, as are being sought to be placed on record,
are ordered to be placed on record.
According to both the counsels, the documents sought to
be placed on record pertain to the proceedings, from which the
present proceedings arise, therefore, present application is
allowed. The documents, as prayed, are ordered to be taken on
record. The application stands disposed of.
CMPMO No.497 of 2024
As jointly prayed, list after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 02, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Vijay Singh vs. Anju Garg and another
RSA No.296 of 2024
.
02.07.2025 Present: Mr. Prashant Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Rahul Mahajan, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Respondent No.2 ex parte vide order dated 07.03.2025.
Let record of the Courts below be called for. List after
receipt of the record.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 02, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Roshan Lal vs. Ajay Kumar and others
RSA No.206 of 2024
.
02.07.2025 Present: Ms. Shivani, Advocate, vice Mr. P.M. Negi, Advocate, for the
appellant.
Mr. Ajay Kumar Dhiman, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to
4.
Respondent No.5 proceeded against ex parte vide order
dated 11.11.2024, passed by Additional Registrar (Judicial).
Record stands received.
Learned counsel for the parties intend to go through the
same.
List for consideration after six weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 02, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
.
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Sunit Singh vs. Surjit Singh and others a/w connected
matter
RSA No.139 of 2024 a/w RSA No.141 of 2024
.
02.07.2025 Present: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Tarun Brakta,
Advocate, for the appellant, in both the appeals.
Mr. Kunal Mehta, Advocate, vice Mr. Parmod Singh Thakur,
Advocate, for respondents No.1 and 2.
Respondent No.3 proceeded against ex parte vide order
dated 19.06.2025, passed by Addl. Registrar (Judicial).
RSA No.139 of 2024
Respondent No.3 though served, however no one has put
in appearance on his behalf before Additional Registrar (Judicial)
of this Court, on 19.06.2025, hence, he has been proceeded
against ex parte.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant
seeks time to have instructions qua furnishing of security bonds,
in terms of order dated 10.12.2024 before the Trial Court.
List after four weeks.
RSA No.141 of 2024
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to
respondent No.3, returnable within four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 02, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Anil Kumar and another vs. Tilak Raj
Civil Revision No.123 of 2024
.
02.07.2025 Present: Mr. Gurinder Singh, Parmar, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Dheeraj K. Vashisht, Advocate, for the respondent.
At the request of learned counsel for the petitioners, list
after four weeks.
July 02, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Anil Kumar vs. Sunita Devi and others
RSA No.117 of 2024
.
02.07.2025 Present: Mr. Rishabh Thakur and Mr. H.M. Thakur, Advocates, for the
appellant.
Mr. Mohar Singh, Advocate, vice Mr. Surinder Saklani,
Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Sambhav Bhasin, Advocate, as Legal Aid Counsel, for
respondent No.3.
Mr. Sambhav Bhasin, learned Advocate has been
appointed as a Legal Aid Counsel for respondent No.3. Let
copies of the entire proceedings, in the case at hand, be supplied
to the Legal Aid Counsel by the concerned counsels appearing
on behalf of the appellant and respondent No.1, on or before the
next date of hearing.
List after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 02, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Faqir Chand and another vs. Mangar Ram and others
Civil Revision No.89 of 2024
.
02.07.2025 Present: Mr. Nipun Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. Parmod Singh Thakur,
Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. N.K. Thakur, Senior Advocate with Mr. Divya Raj
Singh, Advocate, for the respondents.
Further time prayed by learned vice counsel appearing on
behalf of the petitioners to inspect the record.
Let the needful be done on or before the next date of
hearing. List after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 02, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Pritha Sharma and another vs. Janak Raj Sharma and
others
Civil Revision No.67 of 2024
.
02.07.2025 Present: Mr. Santosh Kumar, Advocate, vice Mr. Sumeet Raj Sharma,
Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Jeevesh Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of the
petitioners submits that learned original counsel is not available
today on account of personal difficulty. He seeks an
adjournment. Prayer not opposed.
As prayed, list after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 02, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Aftab Begum and another vs. Mohd Rafiq and others
.
RSA No.19 of 2024
02.07.2025 Present: Mr. Suneet Goel, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vishwas
Kaushal, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Ashok Kumar Tyagi, Advocate, for the respondents.
As jointly prayed, list after four weeks.
July 02, 2025 (KS) to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
M/s Som Nath Swaran Lal vs. Dr. Shashi Pal Sood
(deceased) through LRs.
Civil Revision No.07 of 2024
.
02.07.2025 Present: Mr. Shakti Bhardwaj, Advocate, vice Mr. Ravi Tanta, Advocate,
for the petitioner.
Mr. B. Nandan Vashisht and Mr. S.S. Sood, Advocates, for the
respondents.
Further time prayed by learned vice counsel appearing on
behalf of the petitioner to inspect the record.
Let the needful be done on or before the next date of
hearing. List after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 02, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Purshotam Lal vs. State of HP
RSA No.274 of 2023
.
02.07.2025 Present: Mr. Sanjeev Kuthiala, Senior Advocate with Ms Amita
Chandel, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
List for consideration after four weeks.
July 02, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Ram Lal and another vs. The Secretary (Health &
Family Welfare) and others
RSA No.238 of 2023
.
02.07.2025 Present: Mr. Varun Rana, Advocate, vice Mr. Sarthak Mehta,
Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondents/State.
Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of the
appellants submits that learned original counsel is not available
today on account of personal difficulty.
r He seeks an
adjournment. Prayer not opposed.
As prayed, list after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 02, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
NHAI vs. Shakuntla Devi and another
Arbitration Appeal No.37 of 2023
.
02.07.2025 Present: Mr. Santosh Kumar, Advocate, vice Mr. Sumeet Raj Sharma,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Varun Rana, Advocate, for respondents No.1(i) to 1(iv)
and respondent No.2.
OMP(M) Nos.24 & 25 of 2025
Legal Heirs mentioned in the application have been served.
Power of attorney on their behalf stands filed.
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicants as well as respondent No.2. They have no objection, if in
case the applications are allowed and the legal heirs of deceased
respondent No.1 are brought on record as is being sought in the
application (OMP(M) No.25 of 2025).
Respondent No.1 is stated to have expired on 27.10.2022.
The same is evident form the Death Certificate appended along-with
the application (OMP(M) No.25 of 2025). The details of the legal
heirs are given in Paragraph-3 of the application (OMP(M) No.25 of
2025). The same are in consonance with the details mentioned in
the Certificate furnished to the applicant by the concerned Gram
Panchayat, appended along with the application. LR No.1(ii) is one
Shri Balak Ram. He already exists on record as respondent No.2.
The right to sue inheres/survives in the legal heirs of
deceased respondent No.1, i.e. LR No.1(i), 1(iii) and 1(iv), detailed
in Paragraph-3 of the application (OMP(M) No.25 of 2025).
Accordingly, they are ordered to be brought on record.
For the bona fide reasons stated/sufficient cause shown in
the application (OMP(M) No.24 of 2025), delay in bringing on the
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
legal heirs of deceased respondent No.1, is condoned and
.
abatement, if any, is set aside.
The applications stand disposed of. Amended memo of
parties be filed within four weeks.
OMP(M) No.85 of 2023
Heard counsel for the parties. Perused the pleadings.
For the sufficient reasons and cause shown in the
application, delay of 09 months and 15 days in filing the present
appeal, is condoned. The application stands disposed of.
Arbitration Appeal No._____of 2025
Be registered.
Notice. Mr. Varun Rana, learned counsel, appears and
waives service of notice on behalf of newly added respondents
No.1(i) and 1(ii) and respondent No.2.
List for admission after six weeks.
OMP No.623 of 2025
Notice in the aforesaid terms.
In the meanwhile, operation and execution of impugned
judgment dated 07.01.2022, passed by learned District Judge,
Mandi, District Mandi, Himachal Pradesh, in Arbitration Petition
No.79 of 2018, titled National Highway Authority of India vs. Hari
Ram and others, shall remain stayed, subject to depositing of the
entire awarded amount along-with up-to-date interest within a period
of six weeks from today.
List for consideration after six weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 02, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Naresh Kumar and another vs. Bharti Sharma and
another a/w connected matter
CMPMO No.26 of 2023 a/w CMPMO No.501 of 2023
.
CMPMO No.26 of 2023
02.07.2025 Present: Mr. P.S. Goverdhan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vivek Singh
Attri, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Tarun Brakta,
Advocate, for the respondents.
CMPMO No.501 of 2023
r to
Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Tarun Brakta,
Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. P.S. Goverdhan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vivek
Singh Attri, Advocate for the respondents.
At the request of Mr. Vivek Singh Attri, learned counsel for
the petitioners in CMPMO No.26 of 2023, list after three weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 02, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Tulsi Ram and another vs. Amin Chand and another
RSA No.250 of 2022
02.07.2025 Present: Mr. G.D. Verma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sumit Sharma,
.
Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Y.P. Sood, Advocate, for the respondents.
CMP No.4660 of 2025
The present application has been filed seeking recalling of
order dated 18.12.2022, whereby an application bearing CMP
No.11900 of 2022 filed for seeking interim order in the present
appeal, has been dismissed, as not pressed.
Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the
pleadings.
The sole contention urged on behalf of the non-
applicants/respondents is that the application is not duly
supported by an affidavit of the appellant, in the case at hand.
The applicants, in the case at hand were the defendants
before the trial Court. The non-applicants have filed a suit seeking
a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction and a decree of
mandatory injunction. The suit so filed by the non-applicants had
been decreed, whereas the appeal preferred thereof had been
dismissed.
Being aggrieved of the same, present appeal has been
filed. On filing the present appeal, an application being CMP
No.11900 of 2022 had been filed under Order 41 Rule 5 of the
Civil Procedure Code seeking grant of stay of operation and
execution of the judgment passed by the Courts below. An
appropriate order staying the operation and execution of the
judgments and decree passed by the Courts below had been
passed, on 30.08.2022. The pleadings in the same were
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
completed and the matter, vide order dated 13.12.2024, insofar
.
as an interim application being CMP No.11900 of 2022 was
concerned, was ordered to be listed for consideration on
18.12.2024.
Perusal of the record shows that on 18.12.2024, the
application for interim order filed under Order 41 Rule 5 of the
Civil Procedure Code was dismissed as not pressed by the
applicants/appellants/defendants, in the case at hand.
r The
present application, duly supported by an affidavit of a counsel,
has been filed seeking restoration of order dated 18.12.2024.
In the facts and attending circumstances of the case at
hand, it is evident that withdrawal of application filed under Order
41 Rule 5 of the Civil Procedure Code seems highly improbable
and contrary to the interests of the applicants/appellants. In the
present application, it has categorically been averred that no
instructions to the extent of withdrawal of the Order 41 Rule 5
application, i.e. CMP No.11900 of 2022 had been imparted to the
counsel by the appellants, in the case at hand. Besides the
aforesaid, it cannot be expected that a counsel would act contrary
to the interests of the party who has engaged him. Non filing of
an affidavit by the appellants along with the present application is
of no consequence as the present application is duly supported
by an affidavit of the counsel and for the aforesaid reasons.
Keeping in view the aforesaid, present application seeking
recalling of order dated 18.12.2024 is allowed. The application
being CMP No.11900 of 2022 is restored to its original number
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
and position. List the application (CMP No.11900 of 2022) for
.
consideration, on 21.07.2025.
Application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 02, 2025 (KS) Judge
r to
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Chaman Lal vs. Satish Kumar
CMPMO No.145 of 2019
.
02.07.2025 Present: Ms. Anjali Soni Verma, Advocate, as Legal Aid Counsel,
for the petitioner, who is stated to have expired.
Mr. Sunny Modgill, Advocate through video conferencing
and Ms. Annanya Verma, Advocate for the petitioner.
Petitioner is stated to have expired. Let consequential
steps for bringing on record his legal heirs be taken within four
weeks. List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 02, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Banarsi Dass (deceased) through LRs. vs. Baldev
Singh (deceased) through LRs. and others
Civil Revision No.67 of 2020
.
02.07.2025 Present: Mr. Harshit Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Janesh Gupta,
Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. K.D. Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Het Ram Thakur,
Advocate, for respondents No.2(a) to 2(d).
Respondents No.1(a) to 1(d) and 3(a) to 3(c) proceeded
against ex parte vide order dated 22.09.2021.
As jointly prayed, list on 16.07.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 02, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Rajeev Sen and others vs. State of HP and others
RSA No.27 of 2025
.
01.07.2025 Present: Mr. Sunil Mohan Goel, Senior Advocate with Mr. Paras
Dhaulta, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondents-State.
Learned Additional Advocate General submits that the
issue of limitation, which arises for consideration in the case at
hand, is coming up for consideration before the Apex Court in
similar matter in near future. In view thereof, list the matter in the
second week of August, 2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 01, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
LAC, HPPWD vs. Surinder Kumar and others
CMP(M) No.1099 of 2024
.
01.07.2025 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General for the
applicant/ appellant.
Mr. Lalit Kumar Sehgal, Advocate, for the respondents.
CMP No.12625 of 2024
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is
allowed. The delay in re-filing the appeal, is condoned. The
application stands disposed of.
CMP(M) No.1099 of 2024
In filing of the present appeal, there is a delay of 132 days.
The same has been duly explained in the application filed for
condonation of delay. Even otherwise, while dealing with an
application for condonation of delay filed by the State, one has to be
conscious of the bureaucratic delays, impersonal nature of the
governmental functioning, institutional interest and hence a justice
oriented liberal approach has to be taken while dealing with such
applications.
In this respect, it would be appropriate to refer to decision of
the Hon’ble Apex Court passed in State of Manipur and others vs.
Koting Lamkang, 2019 (10) SCC 408. The relevant extract of the
same is being reproduced herein below:-
“7. But while concluding as above, it was necessary for
the Court to also be conscious of the bureaucratic delay
and the slow pace in reaching a government decision and
the routine way of deciding whether the State should
prefer an appeal against a judgment adverse to it. Even
while observing that the law of limitation would harshly
affect the party, the Court felt that the delay in the appeal::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
filed by the State, should not be condoned. against a.
judgment adverse to it. Even while observing that the law
of limitation would harshly affect the party, the Court felt
that the delay in the appeal filed by the State, should not
be condoned.
8. Regard should be had in similar such circumstances to
the impersonal nature of the Government’s functioning
where individual officers may fail to act responsibly. This
in turn, would result in injustice to the institutional interestof the State. If the appeal filed by State are lost for
individual default, those who are at fault, will not usually
be individually affected.”
Other than the aforesaid, it would also be appropriate to refer
to judgment dated 09.10.2023, passed in Civil Appeal No.5867 of
2015 titled Sheo Raj Singh (deceased) through LRs. and others
vs. Union of India and another. The relevant extract of the same is
being reproduced herein below:-.
“37. Having bestowed serious consideration to the rival
contentions, we feel that the High Court’s decision tocondone the delay on account of the first respondent’s
inability to present the appeal within time, for the reasons
assigned therein, does not suffer from any errorwarranting interference. As the aforementioned
judgments have shown, such an exercise of discretion
does, at times, call for a liberal and justice- oriented
approach by the Courts, where certain leeway could be
provided to the State. The hidden forces that are at work
in preventing an appeal by the State being presented
within the prescribed period of limitation so as not to allow
a higher court to pronounce upon the legality and validity
of an order of a lower court and thereby secure unholy
gains, can hardly be ignored. Impediments in the working
of the grand scheme of governmental functions have to
be removed by taking a pragmatic view on balancing of
the competing interests.”
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Hence, for the reasons/sufficient cause stated in the
.
application & the aforesaid position of law, delay in filing the present
appeal is condoned. The application stands disposed of.
RFA No.______/2025 & CMP No._____of 2025
Be registered.
List for admission after two weeks.
July 01, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Chuni Devi vs. Ravi Chand Thakur and another
CMP(M) No.380 of 2024
.
01.07.2025 Present: Ms. Shivani Tegta, Advocate, vice Ms. Anjali Soni Verma,
Advocate, for the applicant/appellant.
Mr. Chandresh Pal, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Abhinav Goel, Advocate for respondent No.2.
CMP(M) No.380 of 2024
Heard counsel for the applicant. Perused the pleadings.
For the sufficient reasons and cause shown in the
application, delay of 19 days in filing the present appeal, is
condoned. The application stands disposed of.
RSA No._____of 2025 & CMP No.________of 2025
Be registered.
List for admission after two weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 01, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Sachin Sood and others vs. Satya Devi
RSA No.258 of 2024
.
01.07.2025 Present: Mr. K.D. Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vivek Singh
Thakur, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Naresh Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent.
Learned counsel for the parties jointly submit that there is
a possibility of amicable settlement between the parties and the
matter be referred to the mediation.
On the request of learned counsel for the parties, the
matter is sent for mediation. With the consent of the learned
counsel for the parties, Mr. N.K. Sood, learned Senior Advocate,
is appointed as Mediator in this matter.
Learned counsel for the parties to appear before the
Mediator in the Main Mediation Centre, H.P. High Court, on
04.07.2025 at 12:30 p.m., who shall fix a date for presence of
parties thereafter. The official Coordinator, High Court Main
Mediation Centre shall render all assistance to learned Mediator.
List the matter before the Court after receipt of report of
learned Mediator.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 01, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Purna Devi (deceased) through LRs. and others vs.
Dhruv Singh and others
.
RSA No.74 of 2024
01.07.2025 Present: Mr. Atul G. Sood, Advocate, for the appellants.
Ms. Kavita Kajal, Advocate, vice Mr. Atharv Sharma,
Advocate, for respondents No.1, 2, 3(1), 3(3), 4 and 6.
Respondents No.3(2) and 5 are stated to have expired.
Mr. Dheeraj K. Verma, Advocate, for respondents No.7 to
10.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants
submits that consequential steps for bringing on record the legal
heirs deceased respondents No.3(2) and 5 have been taken on
30.06.2025.
If in order, let the same be placed on record. List after two
weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 01, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Rajni Gupta and Om Parkash and another
.
CMP(M) No.1179 of 2023
01.07.2025 Present: Mr. Ajay Vaidya, Advocate, for the applicant/appellant.
Mr. K.D. Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vivek Singh
Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Rejoinder, if any, be filed within four weeks. List
thereafter.
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
July 01, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Kuldeep Singh Kanwar vs. Manoj Sharma and others
RSA No.355 of 2022
.
01.07.2025 Present: Mr. Sunil Awasthi, Advocate, for the appellant.
None for the respondent.
CMP No.3567 of 2025
Heard counsel for the appellant and perused the
pleadings.
During the pendency of the appeal, operation and
execution of impugned judgment and decree dated 31.08.2022,
passed by learned Additional District Judge-(I), Shimla, Himachal
Pradesh, in Civil Appeal No.07-S/13 of 2022, titled Kuldeep Singh
Kanwar vs. Manoj Sharma and others, shall remain stayed,
subject to furnishing a solvent security to the satisfaction of
learned Registrar (Judicial) of this Court, within a period of four
weeks from today.
The application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 01, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Anjna Thakur vs. Ashutosh Kaushal and another
Civil Suit No.90 of 2022
.
01.07.2025 Present: Mr. Lakshay Parihar, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Ms. Shrutika Chauhan, Advocate, vice Mr. Dheeraj K.
Vashisht, Advocate, for defendants No.1 and 2.
Ms. Ranjana, Advocate, for proposed defendant No.3.
OMP Nos. 508 and 509 of 2024
Pleadings be completed on or before the next date of
hearing. List after four weeks.
In the meanwhile, power of attorney on behalf of proposed
defendant No.3 be also filed.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 01, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
M/s Sohmed Care Pvt. Ltd. vs. Lok Raj and another
Civil Suit No.25 of 2022
.
01.07.2025 Present: Mr. Rahul Mahajan, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocate, for defendant No.1.
Mr. Vinod Chauhan, Advocate, for defendant No.2.
Mr. Somesh Sharma, Advocate, for the proposed defendant-
Desh Raj.
Mr. Ishan Sharma, Advocate, for the proposed defendant-Ms
Reena Kumari.
OMP No.501 of 2025
The suit in the case at hand was filed on 14.08.2018.
Subsequent thereto, written statement was filed by two
defendants. Insofar as written statement so filed by defendant
No.1 is concerned, conspicuous by absence is a pleading to the
effect that during the pendency of the present lis or immediately
prior thereto qua the suit land in the case at hand, one Reena
Kumari had filed a suit against present defendant No.1- Lok Raj,
son of Shri Desh Raj and father of Reena Kumari, plaintiff in the
said suit. The suit so filed by Reena is alleged to have been
compromised before the Lok Adalat, by virtue of which the lands
have now been shown in the ownership of Desh Raj, father of
Reena Kumari.
In view of the aforesaid, during the pendency of the suit,
Desh Raj is restrained from transferring, selling ,encumbering,
alienating or changing the nature of land and property or creating
third party rights or in any manner doing such acts to defeat the
rights of the plaintiff with respect to the suit land, till further orders.
Reply be filed within four weeks.
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
.
OMP Nos.716, 717 and 718 of 2025
Reply, if any, be filed within four weeks. List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 01, 2025 (KS) Judge
r to
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Satya Devi and others vs. Shashi Pal and others
Civil Revision No.33 of 2017
.
01.07.2025 Present: Mr. Karan Singh Kanwar, Advocate, for all the petitioners,
except petitioners No.5 & 7.
Petitioners No.5 and 7 are stated to have expired.
Ms. Divya Rajta, Advocate, vice Mr. Ashok Kumar Tyagi,
Advocate, for respondent No.1.
None for respondents No.13 and 14.
r to
Let consequential steps for bringing on record the legal
heirs of deceased petitioners No.5, 7 and respondents No.8 and
10 be taken within two weeks. List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 01, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Bodh Raj vs. Prem Chand and others
RSA No.161 of 2013
.
01.07.2025 Present: Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate, for all the appellants, except
appellant No.1(b)(i).
Appellant No.1(b)(i) is stated to have expired.
Ms. Kavita Kajal, Advocate, vice Mr. Atharv Sharma,
Advocate, for respondents No.2 to 4 and for proposed
LRs. of deceased respondent No.1.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.8-State.
None for the other respondents.
CMP(M) No.573 of 2025
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicants. The non-applicants have no objection, if in case, the
application is allowed and the legal heirs of deceased respondent
No.1, are brought on record as is being sought in the application.
Respondent No.1 is stated to have expired on 08.12.2024.
The same is evident from the Death Certificate appended along with
the present application as Annexure P-1. Deceased respondent
No.1 is survived by his legal heirs, details whereof, have been given
in Paragraph-3 of the present application.
Since the right to sue inheres/survives with the legal heirs of
deceased respondent No.1, detailed in Paragraph-3 of the
application, therefore, they are ordered to be brought on record.
Memo of appearance on their behalf stands filed. The same is taken
on record. Let power of attorney on their behalf be filed within four
weeks.
The application stands disposed of. Amended memo of
parties be also filed within four weeks.
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
CMP(M) No.1064 of 2025
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
.
applicants. The non-applicants have no objection, if in case the
application is allowed and the name of deceased appellant No.1-
b(i), i.e. Nisha Devi is ordered to be deleted, as is being sought in
the present application.
Appellant No.1-b(i) is stated to have died on 22.04.2025.
The said fact is evident from the death certificate appended along
with the application. She is survived by her legal heirs namely
Aman Abrol and Jyoti, who are already on record as appellants
No.1-b(ii) and 1-b(iii).
Since the right to sue inheres/survives with the legal heirs
of deceased appellant No.1-b(i), who are already on record as
appellants No.1-b(ii) and 1-b(iii), therefore, the present application
is allowed and the name of deceased appellant No.1-b(i) is
ordered to be deleted from the array of the parties, subject to just
all exceptions. Amended memo of parties filed along-with the
present application reflecting the aforesaid deletion is order to be
taken on record.
The application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 01, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
.
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Kundnu vs. Jog Raj and others a/w connected matter
RSA No.456 of 2010 a/w RSA No.432 of 2010
.
RSA No.456 of 2010
01.07.2025 Present: Mr. K.D. Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vivek Singh
Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Vijay Bhatia, Advocate, vice Mr. Ajay Chandel,
Advocate, for respondents No.2 to 4, 6 and 7.
Name of respondent No.5 stands deleted.
Ms. Amita Chandel, Advocate, vice Ms. Anaida Kuthiala,
Advocate, for respondents No.1, 8, 9, 10(a) to 10(c), 11 to
21, 22(a) to 22(c) and 23 to 26.
Respondent No.21 is stated to have expired.
RSA No.432 of 2010
Ms. Amita Chandel, Advocate, vice Ms. Anaida Kuthiala,
Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Vijay Bhatia, Advocate, vice Mr. Ajay Chandel,
Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 7.
Name of respondent No.5 stands deleted.
Mr. K.D. Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vivek Singh
Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.8.
CMP No.14699 of 2025 in RSA No.456 of 2010
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicants. The non-applicants have no objection, if in case the
application is allowed and the name of deceased respondent
No.21 is ordered to be deleted, as is being sought in the present
application.
Respondent No.21 is stated to have died on 13.04.2025.
The said fact is evident from the death certificate appended along
with the application. She is survived by her legal heirs, who are
already on record as respondents No.17 to 20.
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Since the right to sue inheres/survives with the legal heirs
of deceased respondent No.21, who are already on record as
.
respondents No.17 to 20, therefore, the present application is
allowed and the name of deceased respondent No.21 is ordered
to be deleted from the array of the parties, subject to just all
exceptions. Amended memo of parties be filed within four weeks.
The application stands disposed of.
July 01, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Sita Devi and others vs. Parma Nand (deceased)
through LRs. and others
RSA No.397 of 2009
.
01.07.2025 Present: Mr. K.D. Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vivek Singh
Thakur, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Digvijay Singh Bisht, Advocate, vice Mr. B.C. Verma,
Advocate, for respondents No.1(a) to 1(d), 2, 3(a), 4 and 9
to 11.
None for respondents No.5(a) to 5(d), 6, 7(a) to 7(d) and 8.
r to
CMP(M) No.188 of 2025
Heard counsel for the parties and perused the pleadings.
Respondent No.3 is stated to have expired on 17.11.2024,
as is evidence from the Death Certificate appended along with
the present application as Annexure A-1. Deceased respondent
No.3 is survived by his legal heirs mentioned in Paragraph-2 of
the application. However, insofar as Kanshi Ram and Gian
Chand are concerned, the said legal heirs are already on record,
as respondents No.2 and 4, respectively.
Insofar as Roshni Devi is concerned, she has been
served. Reply on her behalf stands filed. The right to sue
survives in the legal heirs of deceased respondent No.3.
In view of above, present application is allowed. Roshni
Devi is ordered to be brought on record as respondent No.3(a).
Amended memo of parties appended with the present application
is ordered to be taken on record.
The application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 01, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Geeta vs. Deepa
CMPMO No.334 of 2025
.
01.07.2025 Present: Mr. S.D. Gill, Advocate, for the petitioner.
CMPMO No.334 of 2025 & CMP No.14025 of 2025
On taking steps during the course of the day, Dasti notice
be issued to the respondent, returnable for 04.07.2025. Dasti
notice be handed over to learned counsel for the petitioner/
applicant for effecting service upon the non-applicant-respondent,
latest by 03.07.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 01, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Ashok Kumar vs. Krishna Devi
RSA No.149 of 2025
.
01.07.2025 Present: Ms. Shwetima Dogra, Advocate, vice Mr. Rajesh Verma,
Advocate, for the appellant.
RSA No.149 of 2025
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the
respondent, returnable within four weeks. Notices have been
issued on substantial question of law No.2 framed at Page-7 of
the paper book.
CMP No.14824 of 2025
Notice in the aforesaid terms.
In the meanwhile, operation and execution of impugned
judgment and decree dated 29.03.2025, passed by learned
District Judge, Chamba, District Chamba, Himachal Pradesh, in
Civil Appeal No.48 of 2024, titled Krishna Devi vs. Ashok Kumar,
shall remain stayed, subject to depositing of the entire awarded
amount along-with up-to-date interest within a period of four
weeks from today.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 01, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Hari Ram Barali vs. Bimla Devi and others
RSA No.59 of 2025
.
01.07.2025 Present: Mr. Naveen Kumar Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the appellant.
At the request of learned counsel appearing on behalf of
the appellant, list after two weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
July 01, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Manoj Kumar and another vs. Hoshiar Singh and
others
RSA No.270 of 2024
.
30.06.2025 Present: Ms. Vandana, Advocate, vice Mr. Sanjay Jaswal,
Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Mohar Singh, Advocate, vice Mr. Surinder Saklani,
Advocate, for the respondents.
CMP No.21534 of 2024 Rejoinder, if any, be filed within four weeks. List thereafter. r ( Bipin C. Negi ) June 30, 2025 (KS) Judge ::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Tamberdhwaj vs. Lalit Kumar and others
RSA No.192 of 2024
.
30.06.2025 Present: Mr. G.D. Verma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Digvijay Singh
Bisht, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. H.S. Rangra, Advocate, for the respondents.
Record stands received.
Learned counsel for the parties intend to go through the
same.
List for consideration after six weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 30, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Housing and Urban Development Corporation Limited
vs. Bir Singh and others
RSA No.171 of 2024
.
30.06.2025 Present: Mr. Sanjay Dalmia, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Naresh Kumar Sharma, Advocate, for respondent
No.1.
Respondents No.2(a) to 2(f) proceeded against ex parte.
Learned counsel for the appellant seeks further time to go
r to
through the record. As prayed, list after six weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 30, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Radha Devi and others vs. Gangi Devi and another
RSA No.169 of 2024
.
30.06.2025 Present: Mr. Dibender Ghosh, Advocate, for the appellants.
Ms. Meera Devi, Advocate vice Mr. Deepak Gupta,
Advocate, for respondent No.1
Mr. Vipin Pandit, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
As jointly prayed, list after four weeks.
June 30, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Joni and another vs. Anokhi Ram and another
CMPMO No.156 of 2024
.
30.06.2025 Present: Mr. H.R. Jhingta, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Dinesh Kumar Sharma and Mr. Y.K. Paul, Advocates,
for respondent No.1.
None for respondent No.2.
Let record of the First Appellate Court, in the case at hand,
be called for. List after receipt of the record.
r ( Bipin C. Negi )
June 30, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Netar Singh vs. Ramki Devi and another
RSA No.49 of 2024
.
30.06.2025 Present: Mr. Vinay Mehta, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Romesh Verma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sumit
Sharma, Advocate, for the respondents.
At the request of learned counsel appearing on behalf of
the appellant, in order to enable him to prepare the case, list after
four weeks.
r ( Bipin C. Negi )
June 30, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
M/s Shivalik Co-op. House Building Society Ltd. vs.
Sarwan (deceased) through LR. and others
RSA No.41 of 2024
.
30.06.2025 Present: Mr. Romesh Verma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sumit
Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Ms. Nisha Nalot, Advocate, vice Mr. Ishan Sharma,
Advocate, for respondents No.1(i), 2(i) to 2(iv), 3(a), 3(b)
(i), 3(b)(ii), 3(c)(i) to 3(c)(iii), 3(d), 4, 5, 6(i) to 6(iii).
Mr. Bhim Raj Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.7
and 8(a).
r to
At the request of learned counsel appearing on behalf of
the appellant, in order to complete his brief, adjournment is
prayed for. Not opposed. List after six weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 30, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Shesh Ram and another vs. Bimla Devi and others
RSA No.106 of 2023
.
30.06.2025 Present: Ms. Meera Devi, Advocate vice Mr. Deepak Gupta,
Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Vivek Singh Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. Het Ram
Thakur, Advocate, for the respondents.
Further time prayed to inspect the record. List after six
weeks.
r ( Bipin C. Negi )
June 30, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Jhabe Ram vs. Sunder (deceased) through LRs.
RSA No.386 of 2022
.
30.06.2025 Present: Mr. Kunal Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. Sudhir Bhatnagar,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Jia Lal, Advocate, vice Mr. G.R. Palsra, Advocate, for
respondents No.1(i) to 1(iv).
Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant
submits that learned original counsel is not available today on
account of personal difficulty. He seeks an adjournment. Prayer
not opposed.
As prayed, list after six weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 30, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Budhi Ram vs. Hem Raj
RSA No.354 of 2022
.
30.06.2025 Present: Mr. Romesh Verma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sumit
Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Rakesh Thakur, Advocate, for the respondent.
Record stands received.
Learned counsel for the parties intend to go through the
same. r
List for consideration after six weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 30, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Pushpa Saini and others vs. Chanda Devi
RSA No.2 of 2022
.
30.06.2025 Present: Ms. Bhavya, Advocate, vice Mr. Rupinder Singh,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Pranjal Munjal, Advocate, vice Mr. Janesh Gupta,
Advocate, for the respondents.
Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of the
respondents submits that learned Senior Counsel is not
presently at Shimla as he has to undergo an eye surgery in the
near future. He prays for an adjournment. Prayer allowed.
List in the second week of August, 2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 30, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Koullan Devi (deceased) through LRs. Vs. Gurdittu
(deceased) through LRs. and others
CMPMO No.289 of 2021
.
30.06.2025 Present: Ms. Sana Rana, Advocate, vice Ms. Rachna Kuthiala,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Umesh Kanwar, Advocate, for respondents No.1 (a) to
1(c).
Respondents No.2 to 5 & 7 to 15 ex parte.
Respondent No.6 is stated to have expired.
From a perusal of the Lower Court record, it is evident that
respondent No.6, who is stated to have died, his name has
already been deleted from the array of the parties. In view
thereof, there is no requirement for bringing on record the legal
heirs of deceased respondent No.6.
List after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 30, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Bhisham Lal Garg vs. Hardei and others
CMP(M) No.1044 of 2025
.
30.06.2025 Present: Mr. Rajiv Rai, Advocate, for the applicant/appellant.
CMP No.14408 of 2025
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is
allowed. The delay in re-filing the appeal, is condoned. The
application stands disposed of.
CMP(M) No.1044 of 2025
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the
respondents, returnable within four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 30, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Sukhdev vs. Abdul Hakim
CMP(M) No.575 of 2025
.
30.06.2025 Present: Ms. Aruna Sharma, Advocate, for the applicant/appellant.
CMP(M) No.575 of 2025
Sole respondent though served, however, there is no
appearance on his behalf.
Heard counsel for the applicant. Perused the pleadings.
For the sufficient reasons and cause shown in the
application, delay of 158 days in filing the present appeal, is
condoned. The application stands disposed of.
RSA No._____of 2025 & CMP No.________of 2025
Be registered.
List for admission after two weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 30, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Jakir Hussain vs. Narender Singh and another
CMP(M) No.487 of 2025
.
30.06.2025 Present: Mr. Sambhav Bhasin, Advocate, for the applicant/
appellant.
Mr. Shanti Swaroop, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Arvind Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
CMP(M) No.487 of 2025
applicants.
r to
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
Heard counsel for the parties. Perused the pleadings.
For the sufficient reasons and cause shown in the
application, delay of 25 days in filing the present appeal, is
condoned. The application stands disposed of.
RSA No._____of 2025 & CMP No.________of 2025
Be registered.
Notice. Mr. Shanti Swaroop and Mr. Arvind Sharma,
learned counsel, appear and waive service of notice on behalf of
respondent No.1 and respondent No.2, respectively.
List for admission after two weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 30, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Chaman Lal vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Cr.MP(M) No.2948 of 2024
.
30.06.2025 Present: Mr. Deepak Kaushal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Anil Kumar
Manget, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
At the request of learned counsel for the petitioner, in
r to
order to enable him to prepare the case, list on 21.07.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 30, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Rakesh Kumar vs. Rajput Sthaniya Sabha Shimla and
others
CMP(M) No.217 of 2024
.
30.06.2025 Present: Mr. Naresh Sharma, Advocate, for the applicant/petitioner.
Mr. Lakshay Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant/
petitioner seeks further time to ascertain the correct address(es)
of respondents No.2, 3(a) and 3(b).
Let the needful be done within two weeks. On filing the
correct address(es) and process fee by the applicant-petitioner,
let notice be issued to them, returnable within four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 30, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Basanti Devi vs. Dhani Ram and others
RSA No.166 of 2024
.
30.06.2025 Present: Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate, vice Mr. R.S. Chandel,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Harshit Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Janesh Gupta,
Advocate, for respondent No.1.
None for respondents No.2 to 4.
Respondent No.5 is stated to have expired.
r to
From perusal of order dated 07.03.2025, it is evident that
respondent No.5-Smt. Mathi has expired about 8-9 months prior
to 07.03.2025. In view thereof, present appeal insofar as
respondent No.5 is concerned, stands abated.
List after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 30, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Veena Devi vs. Durga Singh and others
RSA No.320 of 2022
.
30.06.2025 Present: Mr. Sanket Sankhyan, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Somesh Raj, Advocate, vice Mr. Mohar Singh,
Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 3.
Respondent No.4 is stated to have expired.
None for respondents No.5 to 8.
CMP No.14300 of 2025
present appeal.
Respondent No.4 has died during the pendency of the
For bringing on record her legal heirs, two
applications bearing Nos.CMP(M) No.1361 and 1362 of 2023 had
been filed. For effecting service upon the legal heirs of deceased
respondent No.4, i.e. respondent Nos.4(a) and 4(b), they were
ordered to be served through publication in the newspaper, “Amar
Ujala” vide order dated 13.06.2024, passed by the Additional
Registrar (Judicial) of this Court.
After having served through publication, none has put in
appearance on their behalf, hence, applications moved for their
impleadment ( being CMP(M) Nos.1361 and 1362 of 2023) were
allowed and they were arrayed as party respondents, in the case
at hand.
Thereafter, they were ordered to be served in the Regular
Second Appeal. By way of present application, request has
been made for effecting service of respondents No.4(a) and 4(b),
by way of publication.
Keeping in view the aforesaid, present application is
allowed. Let respondents No.4(a) and 4(b) be served through
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
publication in the newspaper, “Amar Ujala” having circulation in
.
the area of residence of the aforesaid two individuals. Steps for
effecting service through publication be taken within two weeks.
Let the said respondents be served through publication in the
newspaper, “Amar Ujala”, relevant edition, for 20.08.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 30, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Chhotu Ram vs. Rajiya Begam and others a/w
connected matter
Civil Suit No.44 of 2022 a/w Civil Suit No.45 of 2022
.
30.06.2025 Present: Mr. Karan Singh Kanwar, Advocate, for the plaintiff(s), in
both the suits.
Mr. Manoj Sharma, Advocate, for defendants No.1 and 2,
in both the suits.
Mr. Hitesh Kumar, Advocate, for newly added defendants
No.3 to 6.
r to
Civil Suit No.44 of 2022
Replication to the written statement filed on behalf of the
defendants be filed within six weeks. List thereafter.
OMP(M) No.173 of 2023 in Civil Suit No.44 of 2022
Rejoinder, if any, be filed on or before the next date of
hearing.
Civil Suit No.45 of 2022
Further time prayed for filing replication. Let the needful
be done on or before the next date of hearing.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 30, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Liaq Ram and others vs. State of HP and another a/w
connected matters
RFA No.287 of 2017 a/w RFA Nos.29, 30, 31, 165 to 168
.
& 171 of 2018 and RFA No.472 of 2019
28.06.2025 Present: Mr. Ramesh Sharma, Advocate, for the appellants, in all
the appeals.
Mr. R.P. Singh, Deputy Advocate General, for the
respondents/State, in all the appeals.
As jointly prayed, list on 17.07.2025.
r ( Bipin C. Negi )
June 28, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Subhash vs. State of HP and others a/w connected
matter
CMPMO No.400 of 2024 a/w
.
CMPMO No.401 of 2024
28.06.2025 Present: Mr. Divya Raj Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner(s), in both
the petitions.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondents No.1 & 3/State, in both the petitions.
Mr. Vijay Arora, Senior Advocate with Ms. Lalita Sharma,
Advocate, for respondents No.2, 4 & 5, in both the
petitions.
As jointly prayed, list on 10.07.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 28, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Om Parkash vs. Sandesh Kumar and another
CMPMO No.311 of 2024
.
28.06.2025 Present: Mr. Digvijay Singh Bisht, Advocate, vice Mr. B.C. Verma,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Lovneesh Kanwar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Tek
Chand, Advocate, for the respondent.
At the request of learned vice counsel appearing on behalf
of the petitioner, list after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 28, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
-----
---
.
28.06.2025 Present: Mr. Sanjeev Kuthiala, Senior Advocate with Ms. Sana
Rana, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Piyush Agnihotri, Advocate, vice Mr. Dheeraj K.
Vashisht, Advocate, for the respondent.
Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of the
respondent submits that learned original counsel is not available
today on account of personal difficulty.
r He seeks an
adjournment. Prayer not opposed.
As prayed, list after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 28, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Man Singh vs. Manmohan Singh and others
Civil Revision No.174 of 2024
.
28.06.2025 Present: Mr. J.L. Bhardwaj, Senior Advocate with Ms. Dhanwanti,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Suneet Verma, Advocate, vice Mr. Vishwas Kaushal,
Advocate, for respondents No.1, 2(b), 2(c), 3 and 4.
As jointly prayed, list on 05.08.2025.
June 28, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
M/s Aggarwal Agencies vs. Vijay Kumar Sharma
Civil Revision No.143 of 2024
.
28.06.2025 Present: Ms. Seema K. Guleria, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Anand Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Karan
Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent.
CMP No.4581 of 2025
As jointly prayed, list on 16.07.2025.
June 28, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Kirpi and others vs. Shiv Ram and others
CMPMO No.130 of 2024
.
28.06.2025 Present: Ms. Seema K. Guleria, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. J.N. Kenan, Advocate, vice Mr. Tek Chand Sharma,
Advocate, for the respondents.
Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of the
respondents submits that the original counsel is unavailable today
on account of bereavement in the family. He seeks an
adjournment. Prayer allowed.
As prayed, list after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 28, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Suresh Sharotri and others vs. State of HP and others
CMPMO No.119 of 2024
.
28.06.2025 Present: Mr. Anuj Nag, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. R.P. Singh, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents
No.1 to 3/State.
Ms. Tanu Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.4.
As jointly prayed, list on 25.07.2025.
June 28, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Santosh Kumari vs. Ravinder Singh and others
CMPMO No.638 of 2023
.
28.06.2025 Present: Mr. R.P. Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Piyush Agnihotri, Advocate, vice Mr. Dheeraj K.
Vashisht, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Further time prayed to inspect the record. List on
14.07.2025.
June 28, 2025 (KS) to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Bihari Lal and others vs. State of HP and others
CMPMO No.612 of 2023
.
28.06.2025 Present: Mr. Shekhar Badola, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.1/State.
Respondents No.2 to 11, 13 to 16 proceeded against ex
parte vide order dated 22.04.2024.
Respondents No.12(a) to 12(d) and 12(f) though served,
proceeded against ex parte.
r to
however, there is no appearance on their behalf. Hence, they are
As jointly prayed, list after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 28, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Harpreet Singh @ Jimmi vs. State of Himachal
Pradesh
Cr.MP(M) No.1119 of 2025
.
28.06.2025 Present: Ms. Anchal Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Kulwant Singh
Gill, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner
submits that learned original counsel is not available today on
account of personal difficulty. She seeks an adjournment. Prayer
not opposed.
As prayed, list on 16.07.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 28, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Harpreet Singh @ Jimmi vs. State of Himachal
Pradesh
Cr.MP(M) No.1119 of 2025
.
28.06.2025 Present: Ms. Anchal Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Kulwant Singh
Gill, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner
submits that learned original counsel is not available today on
account of personal difficulty. She seeks an adjournment. Prayer
not opposed.
As prayed, list on 16.07.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 28, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Rakesh vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Cr.MP(M) No.821 of 2025
.
28.06.2025 Present: Mr. Vipin Pandit, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
Ms. Suchitra Sen, Advocate, for the complainant.
Learned Additional Advocate General seeks time to place
on record a fresh status report, wherein the conduct of the
present petitioner is intended to be highlighted, as according to
him, threats are being meted out to the witnesses by the present
bail petitioner.
List on 14.07.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 28, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Rakesh vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Cr.MP(M) No.803 of 2025
.
28.06.2025 Present: Mr. Ajay Sipahiya, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
At the request of learned counsel for the petitioner, in
order to enable him to prepare the case, matter is adjourned.
List for consideration on 21.07.2025.
r ( Bipin C. Negi )
June 28, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Prince vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Cr.MP(M) No.749 of 2025
.
28.06.2025 Present: Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Suri, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondent/State.
At the request of learned counsel for the petitioner, in
order to enable him to prepare the case, matter is adjourned.
List for consideration on 14.07.2025.
r ( Bipin C. Negi )
June 28, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Suresh Kumar vs. Ramesh Chand and others
CMPMO No.277 of 2025
.
28.06.2025 Present: Mr. Rajiv Rai, Advocate, for the petitioner.
From perusal of the impugned order, it is evident that the
parties to the lis had compromised the matter on 23.01.2019. In
terms of the compromise so entered into between the parties, the
present petitioner was to remove the blockage from the path and
respondent No.1-Ramesh Chand had agreed to install a gate to
avoid ingress and egress of the stray animals.
In view of the aforesaid backdrop, on 05.06.2025, the
petitioner had been directed to file an affidavit qua removal of the
blockage in terms of the compromise entered into on 23.01.2019
inter se the parties, as in the impugned order dated 08.11.2024, it
has categorically been mentioned that the blockage has not been
removed by the present petitioner. The affidavit (placed on record at
page No.31 of the paper-book) in sequel to order dated 05.06.2025,
stands filed by the present petitioner. In the same, petitioner
mentions that he is ready and willing to remove the blockage from
the path in question, if any found at the spot.
In view of the aforesaid, let an affidavit be filed on behalf of
respondent No.5, i.e. Secretary, Gram Panchayat, Kalol. The
affidavit must specifically state, as to whether there is any blockage,
or not. Let the same be filed on or before the next date of hearing.
List on 16.07.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 28, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
State of HP and others vs. Lal Singh (deceased)
through and another
CMP(M) No.217 of 2025
.
28.06.2025 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
appellants/State.
CMP(M) No.217 of 2025
Despite service, no one has put in appearance on behalf of
the respondents. Hence, they are proceeded against ex parte.
In filing of the present appeal, there is a delay of 105 days.
The same has been duly explained in the application filed for
condonation of delay. Even otherwise, while dealing with an
application for condonation of delay filed by the State, one has to be
conscious of the bureaucratic delays, impersonal nature of the
governmental functioning, institutional interest and hence a justice
oriented liberal approach has to be taken while dealing with such
applications.
In this respect, it would be appropriate to refer to decision of
the Hon’ble Apex Court passed in State of Manipur and others vs.
Koting Lamkang, 2019 (10) SCC 408. The relevant extract of the
same is being reproduced herein below:-
“7. But while concluding as above, it was necessary for
the Court to also be conscious of the bureaucratic delay
and the slow pace in reaching a government decision and
the routine way of deciding whether the State should
prefer an appeal against a judgment adverse to it. Even
while observing that the law of limitation would harshly
affect the party, the Court felt that the delay in the appeal
filed by the State, should not be condoned. against a
judgment adverse to it. Even while observing that the law
of limitation would harshly affect the party, the Court felt
that the delay in the appeal filed by the State, should not
be condoned.
8. Regard should be had in similar such circumstances to
the impersonal nature of the Government’s functioning
where individual officers may fail to act responsibly. This::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
in turn, would result in injustice to the institutional interest
of the State. If the appeal filed by State are lost for.
individual default, those who are at fault, will not usually
be individually affected.”
Other than the aforesaid, it would also be appropriate to refer
to judgment dated 09.10.2023, passed in Civil Appeal No.5867 of
2015 titled Sheo Raj Singh (deceased) through LRs. and others
vs. Union of India and another. The relevant extract of the same is
being reproduced herein below:-.
“37. Having bestowed serious consideration to the rival
contentions, we feel that the High Court’s decision to
condone the delay on account of the first respondent’s
inability to present the appeal within time, for the reasons
assigned therein, does not suffer from any error
warranting interference. As the aforementionedjudgments have shown, such an exercise of discretion
does, at times, call for a liberal and justice- oriented
approach by the Courts, where certain leeway could beprovided to the State. The hidden forces that are at work
in preventing an appeal by the State being presentedwithin the prescribed period of limitation so as not to allow
a higher court to pronounce upon the legality and validity
of an order of a lower court and thereby secure unholygains, can hardly be ignored. Impediments in the working
of the grand scheme of governmental functions have to
be removed by taking a pragmatic view on balancing of
the competing interests.”
Hence, for the reasons/sufficient cause stated in the
application & the aforesaid position of law, delay in filing the present
appeal is condoned. The application stands disposed of.
RSA No.______/2025 & CMP No._____of 2025
Be registered.
List after two weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 28, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Dharmi Devi vs. Bimla Devi and another
CMPMO No.102 of 2025
.
28.06.2025 Present: Mr. Jia Lal, Advocate, vice Mr. G.R. Palsra, Advocate, for
the petitioner.
Ms. Madhurika Sekhon Verma, Advocate, for respondent
No.1.
Mr. Devinder K. Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
CMP No.4491 of 2025
Reply, if any, be filed on or before the next date of hearing.
CMPMO No.102 of 2025
Mere pendency of the present petition would not preclude
the trial Court from proceeding further with the lis, from where the
present proceedings, have arisen.
List after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 28, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Rajinder Singh vs. Gajinder Singh and others
RSA No.37 of 2025
.
28.06.2025 Present: Mr. Divya Raj Singh, Advocate, fo the appellant.
Mr. Nimish Gupta, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
None for the other respondents.
RSA No.37 of 2025
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant
submits that besides respondent No.1, all others are the proforma
respondents. Both, before the Trial Court and the First Appellate
Court, they have been proceeded against ex parte. Their interest
lies with the present appellant who was the plaintiff before the
Trial Court.
In view thereof, the appellant is exempted from taking
steps for the service of proforma respondents as their interest
duly stands protected by the appellant.
At the request of learned counsel for respondent No.1 who
submits that he has filed power of attorney and seeks time to
complete his brief, list after six weeks.
CMP No.3760 of 2025
Reply, if any, be filed on or before the next date of hearing.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 28, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
H.P. Power Corporation Ltd. and another vs. Jeet
Singh and others
CMP Nos.20923 and 20924 of 2024 in RFA No.179 of
.
2019
28.06.2025 Present: Mr. Yashveer Singh Rathore, Advocate, for the non-
applicants/ appellants.
Mr. Ranvir Singh Chauhan, Advocate, for the applicants/
respondents.
CMP No.20923 of 2024
The present application is dismissed as withdrawn with
liberty reserved to file appropriate application(s).
The application stands disposed of accordingly.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 28, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Nirmal Chugh vs. Rahul Chugh and others
RSA No.141 of 2025
.
27.06.2025 Present: Mr. Suneet Goel, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vivek Negi,
Advocate, for the appellant.
CMP No.14404 of 2025
The judgment, in the case at hand was passed by the First
Appellate Court on 12.03.2025. Subsequent to the passing of the
judgment, on 13.04.2025 respondent No.3 had died. Deceased
respondent No.3 is survived by her legal heirs, mentioned in
Paragraph-2 of the application.
Since the right to sue inheres/survives with the legal heirs of
deceased respondent No.3, detailed in Paragraph-2 of the
application, therefore, they are ordered to be brought on record.
Amended memo of parties is taken on record. The application
stands dipsosed of.
RSA No.141 of 2025
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the
respondents, returnable within four weeks. Notices have been
issued on substantial questions of law No.2, 3 & 4 framed at
Pages-11 & 11 of the paper book.
CMP No.14403 of 2025
Notice in the aforesaid terms.
In the meanwhile, operation and implementation of
impugned judgment and decree dated 12.03.2025, passed by
learned Additional District Judge, Nahan, District Sirmaur,
Himachal Pradesh, in Civil Appeal No.8-N/13 of 2024, titled Rahul
Chug and another vs. Janak Bhatacharya @ Rani Bhatacharya
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
and another, shall remain stayed, subject to deposit of the entire
.
awarded amount along-with up-to-date interest within a period of
eight weeks from today.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 27, 2025 (KS) Judge
r to
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:31 :::CIS
Shivalaya Construction Company Private Limited vs.
The Executive Engineer
.
Arbitration Case No.99 of 2019
27.06.2025 Present: Mr. Bimal Gupta, Senior Advocate with Ms. Kusum
Chaudhary, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
In terms of Sections 2(i)(c)(vi) of the Commercial Courts
Act, 2015, the dispute in the case at hand pertains to a
commercial dispute. Therefore, in view of Sections 6 and 10(2) of
the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, list the matter before the
Commercial Division Bench.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 27, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
State of HP and another vs. Manni Ram (deceased)
through LRs. and another a/w connected matter
RFA No.177 of 2019 a/w CWP No.3730 of 2019
.
27.06.2025 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the the
appellant/State, in RFA No.177 of 2019 and for
respondents No.1 and 2 in CWP No.3730 of 2019.
Mr. Arsh Chauhan, Advocate, for respondents No.1(a) to
1(e) and respondent No.2, in RFA No.177 of 2019.
Ms. Meera Devi vice Mr. Deepak Gupta, Advocate, for the
petitioner, in CWP No.3730 of 2019.
CMP No.13990 of 2025 in CWP No.3730 of 2019
Reply, if any, be filed by the non-applicants within a period
of four weeks. List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 27, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Swaran Singh vs. Ravi Singh and others
CMPMO No.33 of 2018
.
27.06.2025 Present: Mr. Prashant Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Sanket Sankhyan, Advocate, for respondents No.1, 2
and 8.
Respondents No.4 and 6 already proceeded against ex-
parte vide order dated 25.10.2019.
The matter is being listed in the Court after April, 2021.
Since proceedings before the trial Court have been stayed vide
order dated 16.01.2018, therefore, list the matter for
consideration on 15.07.2025. Amended memo of parties, if any,
be filed on or before the next date of hearing.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 27, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Dharam Dutt vs. Hari Saran and others
CMPMO No.461 of 2017
.
27.06.2025 Present: Mr. Vivek Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Digvijay Singh Bisht, Advocate, vice Mr. B.C. Verma,
Advocate, for the respondent.
CMP No.5964 of 2025
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is
allowed. The factum of death of respondent No.1-Hari Saran is
taken on record. The application stands disposed of.
CMPMO No.461 of 2017
Let consequential steps for bringing on record the legal
heirs of deceased respondent No.1 be taken within four weeks.
List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 27, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
State of HP & others vs. Murki Lal and others
CMP No.9966 of 2015 in
RFA No.438 of 2006
.
27.06.2025 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
appellants/ State.
Mr. Sanjay Ranta, Advocate, vice Mr. Sunil Kumar,
Advocate, for respondents No.1 and 2.
Learned Additional Advocate General submits that in
compliance to order dated 30.04.2025, an appropriate application
qua share of Usha Devi along-with amended memo of parties
shall be filed during the course of the day.
If in order, let the same be placed on record. List after two
weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 27, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
The Agriculture Service Co-operative Society vs.
Mohinder
RSA No.55 of 2024
.
27.06.2025 Present: Mr. Naresh Kaul, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Anirudh Sharma, Advocate, for proposed LRs.No.1(a)
to 1(d).
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that in terms of
order dated 06.05.2025, an appropriate application for
appointment of Court Guardian for the proposed minor LR-1(b),
shall be filed within a period of four weeks.
List after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 27, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Shakuntla Devi and others vs. Joginder Pal and others
RSA No.411 of 2008
.
27.06.2025 Present: Appellant No.1 is stated to have expired.
Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate, vice Mr. Divya Raj Singh,
Advocate, for appellants No.2 and 3.
Ms. Seema Guleria, Advocate, for respondents No.1 & 2.
Mr. Rohit, Advocate, vice Mr. Sumit Sood, Advocate, for
respondents No.3 and 4.
r to
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of appellants No.2
and 3 submits that an appropriate application for deletion of name
of deceased appellant No.1 shall be filed during the course of the
day. If in order place the same on record.
List after two weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 27, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Promila and another vs. Santosh Kumar and others
RSA No.142 of 2025
.
27.06.2025 Present: Mr. Suneet Goel, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vivek Negi,
Advocate, for the appellants.
RSA No.142 of 2025
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the
respondents, returnable within four weeks. Notices have been
issued on substantial questions of law No.2, 3 & 6 framed at
Pages-12 & 13 of the paper book.
CMP No.14412 of 2025
Notice in the aforesaid terms.
In the meanwhile, operation and implementation of
impugned judgment and decree dated 29.03.2025, passed by
learned District Judge (Forests), Shimla in Civil Appeal
No.14/2023, titled Santosh Kumar and others vs. Promila and
another, shall remain stayed.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 27, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Promila and another vs. Bhag Pati and others
RSA No.140 of 2025
.
27.06.2025 Present: Mr. Suneet Goel, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vivek Negi,
Advocate, for the appellants.
RSA No.140 of 2025
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the
respondents, returnable within four weeks. Notices have been
12 & 13 of the paper book.
r to
issued on substantial questions of law No.1 & 4 framed at Pages-
CMP No.14401 of 2025
Notice in the aforesaid terms.
In the meanwhile, operation and implementation of
impugned judgment and decree dated 29.03.2025, passed by
learned District Judge (Forests), Shimla in Civil Appeal
No.13/2023, titled Bhag Pati and others vs. Promila and another,
shall remain stayed.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 27, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Promila and another vs. Bhag Pati and others
RSA No.139 of 2025
.
27.06.2025 Present: Mr. Suneet Goel, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vivek Negi,
Advocate, for the appellants.
RSA No.139 of 2025
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the
respondents, returnable within four weeks. Notices have been
12 & 13 of the paper book.
r to
issued on substantial questions of law No.1 & 4 framed at Pages-
CMP No.14399 of 2025
Notice in the aforesaid terms.
In the meanwhile, operation and implementation of
impugned judgment and decree dated 29.03.2025, passed by
learned District Judge (Forests), Shimla in Civil Appeal/Cross-
Objection No.57/2024, titled Bhagpati and others vs. Promila and
others, shall remain stayed.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 27, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Ram Prakash vs. Munshi Ram Chaudhary and another
RFA No.48 of 2025
.
27.06.2025 Present: Mr. Surinder Kumar Saklani, Advocate, for the appellant.
RFA No.48 of 2025 & CMP No.14433 of 2025
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the
respondents, returnable within four weeks.
June 27, 2025 (KS)
to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Atma Ram vs. Shankar Dass and another
CMPMO No.336 of 2025
.
27.06.2025 Present: Mr. Naresh K. Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the
respondents, returnable within four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 27, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Roshani Devi vs. Ran Singh (deceased) through LRs.
and another
RSA No.264 of 2011
.
26.06.2025 Present: Mr. Atharv Sharma, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate with Ms. Rinki
Kashmiri, Advocate, for the respondents.
List on 22.07.2025.
June 26, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Collector, Land Acquisition and another vs. Prema
Devi and another
.
RFA No.385 of 2017
26.06.2025 Present: Ms. Shreya Chauhan, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. K.D. Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vivek Singh
Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.2/State.
List on 18.07.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 26, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Lila Devi vs. Sarla Devi
RSA No.244 of 2010
.
26.06.2025 Present: Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate with Ms. Rinki
Kashmiri, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Parav Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent.
List on 17.07.2025.
June 26, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Rekha Karol and others vs. Lachhmi Devi and others
RSA No.272 of 2012
.
26.06.2025 Present: Ms. Meera Devi vice Mr. Deepak Gupta, Advocate, for the
appellants.
Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate with Ms. Rinki
Kashmiri, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Names of respondents No.2, 11 and 12 stand deleted.
Mr. Divya Raj Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.10.
r to
None for remaining respondents.
List on 04.08.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 26, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Ramesh Kumar vs. Nikki Devi and others
CMPMO No.75 of 2022
.
26.06.2025 Present: Mr. Kamal Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Naresh K. Sharma,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Pranjal Munjal, Advocate, vice Mr. Ajeet Pal Singh
Jaswal, Advocate, for the respondents.
CMP(M) Nos.1015 & 1016 of 2025
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the
daughters of deceased respondent No.3, who had not been
brought on record previously when an application being CMP(M)
No.303 of 2025 had been allowed, on 01.05.2025, details
whereof, have been given in Paragraph-5 of the application
(CMP(M ) No.1015 of 2025), returnable within four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 26, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Shamsher Masih vs. Menu Parkash
CMPMO No.465 of 2019
.
26.06.2025 Present: Mr. Aman Sood, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate, for the respondent.
CMP No.14397 of 2025
No reply is intended to be filed as the documents which
are sought to be placed on record are the part of the record of the
trial Court. The application is allowed. The documents appended
along-with the present application are ordered to be taken on
record. The application stands disposed of.
CMPMO No.465 of 2019
List on 21.07.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 26, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Kasturi Devi (deceased) through LRs. and another
vs. Rajeev Sharma and others
Civil Revision No.193 of 2015
.
26.06.2025 Present: Ms. Meera Devi, Advocate, vice Mr. Deepak Gupta,
Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Sumit Sood, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Pranjal Munjal, Advocate, vice Mr. Ajeet Pal Singh
Jaswal, Advocate, for respondents No.2 and 3.
CMP No.23738 of 2024
Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of the
petitioners submits that the original counsel is unavailable today
on account of ill health (presently hospitalized). She seeks an
adjournment. Prayer allowed.
As prayed, list on 18.07.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 26, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Sukh Ram vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Cr.MP(M) No.1488 of 2025
.
26.06.2025 Present: Mr. Yashveer Singh Rathore, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
Notice. Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, learned Additional Advocate
General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the
respondent-State and seeks time to file status report.
List on 30.07.2025. Status report be filed on or before the
next date of hearing.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 26, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
J.C. Jhina and others vs. Suresh Kumar @ Suresh
Chander Thakur and others
Civil Suit No.19 of 2024
.
26.06.2025 Present: Mr. J.S. Bhogal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Satish Sharma
and Ms. Shruti Verma, Advocates, for the plaintiffs.
Mr. Sameer Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. B.R. Verma,
Advocate, for defendants No.1, 3(a) & 3(b).
Ms. Seema Sood, Advocate, for defendant No.3(d).
Defendant No.4 is stated to have expired.
r to
Civil Suit No.19 of 2024
Despite being duly served, there is no appearance on
behalf of defendant No.2, hence, it is proceeded against ex
parte.
In terms of order dated 07.05.2025, passed by the
Additional Registrar (Judicial) of this Court, defendant No.3(c)
has been ordered to be served by way of affixation. Despite
clear orders, the Process Server did not affix the summons, as is
evident from order dated 24.06.2025, passed by the Additional
Registrar (Judicial) of this Court.
In the aforesaid backdrop and specifically as per
provisions of Order 5 Rule 17 of the Civil Procedure Code, it is
incumbent upon the Process Server to affix the summons, in
case there is no likelihood of the person sought to be served to
be found at the address within a reasonable time.
Let appropriate necessary explanation be sought by the
concerned authority from the Process Server.
On taking steps within three days, issue notice for the
service of defendant No.3(c), both by ordinary process as well as
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
by way of affixation. The notice be made returnable within four
.
weeks.
Written statement on behalf of defendants No.3(a), 3(b)
and 3(d) be filed within a period of four weeks. List thereafter.
OMP No.662 of 2025
Reply, if any, be filed by defendants No.1(a), 1(b) and 1(d)
on or before the next date of hearing.
r ( Bipin C. Negi )
June 26, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Managing Director, HPPCL and another vs.
Dharminder Singh and others
RFA No.453 of 2015
.
26.06.2025 Present: Mr. Vivek Negi, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Ranvir Chauhan, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 5.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.6/State.
Mr. B.M. Chauhan, Senior Advocate with Ms. Meenakshi
Tarlokta, Advocate, for the applicants, in CMP No.6118 of
2025.
CMP No.6118 of 2025
At the request of learned counsel appearing on behalf of
the non-applicants, in order to enable him to obtain/file requisite
instructions/reply, if any, list after six weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 26, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Renuka Ji Dham and another vs. Jai Pal Singh and
others
.
CMP No.20548 of 2024, CMP Nos.5701 & 5702 of 2025
in RFA No.39 of 2019
26.06.2025 Present: Mr. Shashi Shirshoo, Advocate, for the appellant/non-
applicant.
Mr. Pawan K. Sharma, Advocate, for the
respondents/applicants.
CMP Nos.5701 & 5702 of 2025
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the non-applicants
submits that reply shall be filed during the course of the day
itself.
Rejoinder thereto, if any be filed within two weeks. List
thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 26, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Bittu vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Cr.MP(M) No.1199 of 2025
.
26.06.2025 Present: Mr. Sanjay Ranta, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
ASI Chaman Lal, I/O Police Station, Banjar, District Kullu,
Himachal Pradesh, is present along-with record.
Status report stands filed. The same is taken on record.
Copy, whereof, has been supplied to learned counsel for the
petitioner, who intends to go through the same.
List for consideration on 28.07.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 26, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Collector, Land Acquisition, HPPWD and others vs.
Chhavinder Singh and others
CMP(M) No.1011 of 2025
.
26.06.2025 Present: Mr. R.P. Singh, Deputy Advocate General, for the applicants-
petitioners/State.
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the
respondents, returnable within four weeks.
June 26, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
LAC, HPPWD and others vs. Rachan Kaur (deceased)
through LRs.
CMP(M) No.1010 of 2025 & CMP No.14026 of 2025
.
26.06.2025 Present: Mr. R.P. Singh, Deputy Advocate General, for the applicants-
petitioners/State.
CMP No.14026 of 2026
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is
allowed. The delay in re-filing the appeal, is condoned. The
application stands disposed of.
CMP(M) No.1010 of 2025
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the
respondents, returnable within four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 26, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
LAC, HPPWD and others vs. Asha Ram Pal and others
CMP(M) No.1009 of 2025
.
26.06.2025 Present: Mr. R.P. Singh, Deputy Advocate General, for the applicants-
petitioners/State.
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the
respondents, returnable within four weeks.
June 26, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Chandermani and others vs. State of HP and another
Execution Petition No.752 of 2025
.
26.06.2025 Present: Mr. Karan Singh Parmar, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. R.P. Singh, Deputy Advocate General, for the
respondents/State.
Notice. Mr. R.P. Singh, learned Deputy Advocate General,
appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the
respondents and seeks time to file reply.
Reply/instructions on behalf of the respondents be filed on
or before the next date of hearing. List on 29.07.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 26, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Smt. Kalapati alias Kalawati (deceased) through LRs.
vs. Vijay Kumar (deceased) through LRs. and others
CMPMO No.73 of 2025
.
26.06.2025 Present: Mr. Ashutosh Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Kamal Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Naresh K. Sharma,
Advocate, for the respondents.
Records of the Courts below be called for. List after
receipt of the records.
r ( Bipin C. Negi )
June 26, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
National Highway Authority of India vs. Sita Ram and
others
OMP(M) No.64 of 2025
.
26.06.2025 Present: Ms. Shreya Chauhan, Advocate, for the applicant/
appellant.
Mr. Ashok Sharma, Advocate, for the respondents .
Mr. Ashok Sharma, learned Advocate has put in
appearance on behalf of the respondents. He submits that
power of attorney and reply shall be filed on or before the next
date of hearing.
List on 15.07.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 26, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Atul Sud and others vs. Arya Pratinidhi Sabha, HP and
another
.
CMPMO No.645 of 2024
25.06.2025 Present: Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate with Ms. Rinki
Kashmiri, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Rakesh Thakur, Advocate, for the respondents.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents
submits that learned Senior Arguing Counsel is unavailable
today. He seeks an adjournment. Prayer not opposed.
As prayed, list after four weeks.
Interim order to continue.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 25, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Ashif Khan vs. Amreen Khan
CMPMO No.465 of 2024
.
25.06.2025 Present: Mr. Bimal Gupta, Senior Advocate with Ms. Simran Kaur,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Karan Singh Kanwar, Advocate, for the respondent.
As jointly prayed, list on 09.07.2025.
June 25, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Nisar Mohd. vs. Nanak and others
CMPMO No.407 of 2024
.
25.06.2025 Present: Mr. Bimal Gupta, Senior Advocate with Ms. Simran Kaur,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Respondents No.1 to 4 proceeded against ex parte vide
order dated 19.11.2024.
Mr. Karan Singh Kanwar, Advocate, for respondents No.2
to 4.
At the request of learned counsel appearing on behalf of
respondents No.2 to 4, in order to enable him to prepare the
case at hand, list after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 25, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Hira Lal and another vs. Rakesh Kumar and another
a/w connected matter
.
RSA No.275 of 2024 a/w Cross-Objection No.04 of 2025
25.06.2025 Present: Ms Anita, Advocate, vice Ms. Madhurika Sekhon Verma,
Advocate, for the appellants/Non-Cross Objector.
Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate with Ms. Rinki
Kashmiri, Advocate, for respondents No.1 & 2/Cross
Objector.
Cross-Objection No.04 of 2025
At the request of learned vice counsel appearing on behalf
of the non-cross objectors, list after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 25, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Parshotam Kumar and another vs. Sanjeev Kumar and
another
CMPMO No.244 of 2024
.
25.06.2025 Present: Ms. Rekha Mahajan, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Atharv Sharma,
Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Respondent No.2 proceeded against ex parte vide order
dated 22.04.2025 passed by Additional Registrar (Judicial).
At the request of learned counsel for the petitioner, list for
consideration on 04.08.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 25, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Nirmala Devi and others vs. Shamsher Singh
RSA No.189 of 2024
.
25.06.2025 Present: Mr. Vivek Singh Attri and Mr. Ankit Kaloti, Advocate, for
the appellants.
Mr. Abhishek, Advocate, vice Mr. Parmod Singh Thakur,
Advocate, for the respondent.
CMP No.11998 of 2024
Reply is stated to have been filed on behalf of the
respondent. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the
copy of the same stands received by him. However, the same is
not on record.
Registry to trace the reply so filed and place it on record
well before the next date of hearing, post removal of objection(s),
if any.
Rejoinder to the reply be filed within four weeks. List
thereafter.
Interim order to continue.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 25, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Ashok Kumar vs. Assistant Registrar Cooperative
Societies and others
CMPMO No.161 of 2024
.
25.06.2025 Present: Mr. Rajeev Sood, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondents No.1&2/State.
Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Atharv Sharma,
Advocate, for respondents No.3 & 6.
Mr. Tarun Brakta, Advocate, for respondents No.4 & 5.
Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for an
adjournment on account of ill health of his son. Prayer not
opposed. List after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 25, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Ram Nandini and another vs. Sadha Singh and another
RSA No.148 of 2024
.
25.06.2025 Present: Mr. G.D. Verma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Maan Singh,
Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Anupam Bhandari, Advocate, for the respondents.
Record stands received.
Learned counsel for the parties intend to go through the
same.
List for consideration on 04.08.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 25, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Bihari Lal Khachi vs. Surender Dutt
Civil Revision No.119 of 2024
.
25.06.2025 Present: Mr. Romesh Verma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sumit
Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate with Ms. Rinki
Kashmiri, Advocate, for the respondent.
Learned counsel for the respondent submits that she
needs sometime to complete the brief. In view thereof, list the
matter on 28.07.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 25, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Gurnam Singh and others vs. Ram Sarup and others
CMPMO No.31 of 2024
.
25.06.2025 Present: Mr. Divya Raj Singh and Ms. Ritu Singh, Advocates, for
the petitioners.
Mr. Bhim Raj Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to
4 and 6.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.7/State.
As jointly prayed, list on 15.07.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 25, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Narender Kumar and another vs. Municipal
Corporation, Solan
CMPMO No.25 of 2024
.
25.06.2025 Present: Mr. N.K. Bhalla, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Suneet Verma, Advocate, vice Mr. Varun Rana,
Advocate, for the respondent.
Time prayed on behalf of the petitioner to have
instructions, in the case at hand. List on 10.07.2025.
r ( Bipin C. Negi )
June 25, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Prabhat Kumar vs. Pushpa Devi and others
CMPMO No.255 of 2023
.
25.06.2025 Present: Mr. K.D. Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vivek Singh
Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate with Ms. Rinki
Kashmiri, Advocate, for the respondents.
At the request of learned counsel appearing on behalf of
the petitioner, list on 22.07.2025.
r ( Bipin C. Negi )
June 25, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Raj Kumari vs. Vipan Kumar (deceased) through LRs.
and others
.
Civil Revision No.174 of 2023
25.06.2025 Present: Ms. Shruti Dubey, Advocate, vice Ms. Kiran Dhiman,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Tijender Singh, Advocate, vice Ms. Kamlesh Kumari,
Advocate, for respondents No.1(a) to 1(c).
Mr. Dheeraj K. Vashista, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
r to
Mr. Ishan Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of respondents
No.1(a) to 1(c) submits that the original counsel is unavailable
today on account of bereavement in the family. He seeks an
adjournment. Prayer allowed.
As prayed, list after six weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 25, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Dushyant Kumar Sood and others vs. Surinder Mohan
CMPMO No.235 of 2019
.
24.06.2025 Present: Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate, vice Mr. H.S. Upadhyay,,
Advocate, for petitioners No.2 and 4.
Petitioners No.1 and 3 are stated to have expired.
Mr. Arsh Chauhan, Advocate, for the respondent.
Consequential steps for bringing on record the legal heirs
of deceased petitioners No.1 and 3 be taken within four weeks.
List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 24, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Saraswati and others vs. Geeta Devi and others
RFA No.187 of 2024
.
24.06.2025 Present: Mr. Karan Singh Kanwar, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Sandeep Chauhan, Advocate, for respondents No.1
and 2.
None for respondents No.3(a) to 3(c).
At the request of learned counsel for the appellants, list
after two weeks.
r ( Bipin C. Negi )
June 24, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
HPPCL and another vs. Shamsher Singh and others
RFA No.151 of 2018
.
24.06.2025 Present: Mr. Digvijay Singh Kanwar, Advocate, vice Mr. Vivek Negi,
Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Homender Ghezta, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to
3, 4(a) to 4(c), 5, 6(e), 6(f), 7(a) to 7(e), 8 to 10, 12 to 19,
20(a), 20(b), 21, 22, 24, 26 to 29 and proprosed legal
representatives of deceased respondent No.23.
Name of repondent No.25 stands deleted.
Mr. Surya Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent No.30.
CMP No.10565, 10566, 10568 and 10569 of 2025
Further time prayed for obtaining requisite necessary
instructions. As prayed, list after two weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 24, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Managing Director, H.P.M.C. vs. New India Assurance
Company and others
CMPMO No.727 of 2024
.
24.06.2025 Present: Mr. Rahul Gathania, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raman Sethi, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Vinod Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
CMP No.24480 of 2024
Reply, if any, be filed within one week. Rejoinder thereto,
if any, be filed on or before the next date of hearing.
List on 16.07.2025.
Interim to continue.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 24, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Charan Dass vs. Preeto Devi and others
CMPMO No.535 of 2024
.
24.06.2025 Present: Mr. Kunal Mehta, Advocate, vice Mr. Parmod Singh
Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Basant Pal Thakur, Advocate, for respondents No.2
and 3.
CMP No.13631 of 2025
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicant.
The non-applicant has no objection, if in case the
application is allowed and order dated 21.03.2025, whereby,
respondent No.3 was proceeded against ex parte, is set aside.
Heard counsel for the parties and perused the pleadings.
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is
allowed. Order dated 21.03.2025, whereby, respondent No.3
was proceeded against ex parte, is recalled. Respondent No.3 is
permitted to join the proceedings. The application stands
disposed of.
CMPMO No.535 of 2024
As jointly prayed, list for consideration after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 24, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Bisheshwar Lal vs. Partap Chand and others
CMPMO No.502 of 2024
.
24.06.2025 Present: Mr. B.S. Attri, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Abhinav Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Surinder Saklani,
Advocate, for the respondent.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that documents,
in pursuance to order dated 01.10.2024, stand filed by moving an
the same is not on record.
appropriate application. Learned counsel for the respondent
submits that he has received the copy of the same. However,
Registry to trace the application so filed and place it on
record well before the next date of hearing, post removal of
objection(s), if any.
List for consideration after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 24, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
M/s Aggarwal Agencies vs. Vijay Kumar Sharma
Civil Revision No.143 of 2024
.
24.06.2025 Present: Mr. Imran Khan, Advocate, vice Ms. Seema K. Guleria,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Anand Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Karan
Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent.
CMP No.4581 of 2025
Pleadings are complete.
At the request of learned vice counsel appearing on behalf
of the petitioner, list for consideration on 28.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 24, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Hardev Ratra vs. Diwakar Dutt Modgil
RSA No.178 of 2021
.
24.06.2025 Present: Ms. Shwetima, Advocate, vice Mr. Rajesh Verma,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Khushi Ram Verma, Advocate, vice Mr. O.P. Chauhan,
Advocate, for the respondent.
CMP No.17628 of 2023
Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of the
respondent submits that the original counsel is unavailable today
on account of ill health. He seeks an adjournment. Prayer
allowed.
As prayed, list after four weeks. In the meanwhile, parties
to ascertain the status of the suit property, in terms of order
dated 15.05.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 24, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
M/s Pharari Power Pvt. Ltd. vs. D.C. Kullu
Civil Suit No.59 of 2023
.
24.06.2025 Present: Mr. Balwant Singh Thakur, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
At the request of learned counsel for the plaintiff, list on
30.07.2025.
June 24, 2025 (KS)
to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Shiv Singh Chauhan and others vs. Anil Manrao
CMPMO No.35 of 2022
.
24.06.2025 Present: Mr. Neel Kamal Sood, Senior Advocate with Ms. Heena
Bhardwaj and Ms. Shipra Thakur, Advocates, for the
petitioners.
Mr. Surender Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent.
Learned counsel for the parties jointly submit that there is
possibility of an amicable settlement. In view thereof, they pray
for an adjournment. Prayer allowed.
List on 29.07.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 24, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Partap Chand vs. Tarsem Chand (deceased) through
LRs.
CMPMO No.678 of 2022
.
24.06.2025 Present: Mr. Shekhar Badola, Advocate, vice Mr. Parv Sharma,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Atharv Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent.
As jointly prayed, list for consideration on 07.07.2025.
June 24, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Phulma Devi (deceased) through LRs. vs. Bimla Devi
CMPMO No.277 of 2021
.
24.06.2025 Present: Mr. Y.P. Sood, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Romesh Verma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sumit
Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent.
At the request of learned counsel for the petitioners, list
after two weeks.
June 24, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Shiv Ram and another vs. Rukmani Devi and others
CMPMO No.238 of 2021
.
24.06.2025 Present: None for the petitioners.
Mr. Prashant Sharma, Advocate, for the respondents.
On account of death of the counsel earlier representing the
petitioners, in the case at hand, notices were issued to the
petitioners. Both the petitioners stand served. However, there is
no appearance on their behalf.
The matter was called both forenoon session as well as
post noon session. However, there is no appearance on behalf of
the petitioners. Hence, the present petition is dismissed in default
for non appearance.
Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also
stand disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 24, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Hira Singh Rayta and others vs. Madan Lal Chauhan
and others
CMPMO No.51 of 2021
.
24.06.2025 Present: None for the petitioners.
Ms. Rinki Kashmiri, Advocate, vice Mr. Janesh Gupta,
Advocate, for respondents No.1, 2, 4 and 5.
Respondent No.3 is stated to have expired.
Despite repeated calls, both forenoon session and post
noon session, there is no appearance on behalf of the
petitioners. Hence, the present petition is dismissed in default for
non appearance.
Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also
stand disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 24, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Sumiksha vs. Akhil Kumar
CMPMO No.666 of 2019
.
24.06.2025 Present: Ms. Sunita Sharma, Senior Advocate with Ms. Sugandha,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
CMPMO No.666 of 2019 & CMP No.12454 of 2019
After November, 2019, the matter is being listed today
before the Court.
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the
respondent, returnable within four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 24, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Rohit Dass and another vs. Bidhi Chand
CMPMO No.918 of 2019
.
24.06.2025 Present: Mr. Shekhar Badola, Advocate, vice Mr. J.R. Sharma,
Advocate, for the petitioners.
None for the respondent.
At the pleasure of Hon’ble the Chief Justice, list before
another appropriate Bench.
June 24, 2025 (KS)
to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Prabhu Ram (deceased) through LRs. vs. Shankar
(deceased) through LRs. and others
CMPMO No.672 of 2019
.
24.06.2025 Present: Mr. Neel Kamal Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Ms. Tanu Chauhan, Advocate, vice Mr. Ajay Shandil,
Advocate, for respondents No.1(i), 1(ii), 1(iii)(a), 1(iii)(b),
1(iii)(c), 1(v) to 1(ix), 1(xi) to 1(xiii) and respondents No.6 &
8.
Respndent No.1(iv) is stated to have expired.
within three days.
Steps for the service of respondent No.1(x) and 7 be taken
On taking such steps, issue notice to
respondents No.1(x) and 7 ,returnable within four weeks.
Let consequential steps for bringing on record the legal
heirs of deceased respondent No.1(iv) be also taken in the
meanwhile.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 24, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Heera Singh vs. Raj Rani and others
CMPMO No.567 of 2019
.
24.06.2025 Present: Ms. Sana, Advocate, vice Ms. Rachna Kuthiala, Advocate,
for the petitioner.
Mr. Saurav Rattan, Advocate, for respondent
No.1/applicant in CMP No.10556 of 2025.
Mr. Karan Singh Kanwar, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
CMP No.10556 of 2025
The present application has been filed in pursuance to
order dated 28.03.2025. Learned vice counsel appearing on
behalf of the petitioner seeks time to file reply thereto.
Let the needful be done within four weeks. List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 24, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Collector, Land Acquisition vs. Keshav Ram and
another
RFA No.411 of 2019
.
24.06.2025 Present: Ms. Shreya Chauhan, Advocate, for the appellant.
Respondent No.1 is stated to have expired.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.2/State.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant
submits that an appropriate application for bringing on record the
legal heirs of deceased respondent No.1 has been filed in the
Registry of this Court on 23.06.2025.
If in order, let the same be placed on record. List after two
weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 24, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Collector, Land Acquisition vs. Sangat Ram and
another
RFA No.404 of 2019
.
24.06.2025 Present: Ms. Shreya Chauhan, Advocate, for the appellant.
Respondent No.1 is stated to have expired.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.2/State.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant
submits that an appropriate application for bringing on record the
legal heirs of deceased respondent No.1 has been filed in the
Registry of this Court on 23.06.2025.
If in order, let the same be placed on record. List after two
weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 24, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Senior Executive Engineer and another vs. Gopi
Chand and others
CMP(M) No.98 of 2019
.
24.06.2025 Present: Ms. Sunita Sharma, Senior Advocate with Ms. Sugandha,
Advocate, for the applicants-appellants.
Ms. Mamta Bhatwan and Mr. Prajwal Sharma, Advocates,
for respondents No.1 to 3, 5, 6 & 8.
Proposed LR No.7(a) stands already ex parte.
Steps for the service of respondent No.4 and proposed
LRs No.7(b) & 7(c) be taken within two weeks. On taking such
steps, issue notice to the said respondents, returnable within six
weeks.
Time for effecting service on the aforesaid respondent and
proposed legal heirs, is being taken since 10.07.2024. It is made
clear that if steps are not taken within the aforesaid period, the
present application shall stand dismissed for non prosecution
without further reference to this Court.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 24, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Senior Executive Engineer and another vs. Gopi
Chand and others
CMP(M) No.98 of 2019
.
24.06.2025 Present: Ms. Sunita Sharma, Senior Advocate with Ms.
Sugandha, Advocate, for the applicants-appellants.
Ms. Mamta Bhatwan and Mr. Prajwal Sharma,
Advocates, for respondents No.1 to 3, 5, 6 & 8.
Steps for the service of respondent No.4 and proposed
LRs No.7(a) to 7(c) be taken within two weeks. On taking
such steps, issue notice to the said respondents, returnable
within six weeks.
Time for effecting service on the aforesaid
respondents is being taken since 10.07.2024. It is made
clear that if steps are not taken within the aforesaid period,
the present application shall stand dismissed for non
prosecution without further reference to this Court.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 24, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Brahm Dev alias Brahm Dutt and others vs. Trishla
Devi and others
CMPMO No.116 of 2018
.
24.06.2025 Present: None for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.9/State.
Respondent No.1 is proceeded against ex parte vide order
dated 28.08.2019.
Steps for the service of respondents No.2 to 6, 7(a) to 7(c)
and 8 be taken within one week. On taking such steps, issue
notice to the said respondents, returnable within four weeks.
It is made clear that if steps are not taken within the
aforesaid period, the present petition shall stand dismissed for
non prosecution without further reference to this Court.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 24, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Sushil Kumar vs. PNB and another
RSA No.299 of 2011
.
24.06.2025 Present: Ms. Rinki Kashmiri, Advocate, vice Mr. Janesh Gupta,
Advocate, for the appellant.
None for respondent No.1.
Respondent No.2 is stated to have expired.
CMP(M) No.32 of 2025
Proposed legal heirs of deceased respondent No.2 stand
served. However, there is no appearance on their behalf. They
have already been proceeded against ex parte vide order dated
14.05.2025 passed by Additional Registrar (Judicial).
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicants. The non-applicants have no objection, if in case, the
application is allowed and the legal heirs of deceased respondent
No.2, are brought on record as is being sought in the application.
Respondent No.2 is stated to have expired on 16.11.2020.
The same is evident from the Death Certificate appended along
with the present application. Deceased respondent No.2 is
survived by his legal heirs, details whereof, have been given in
Paragraph-3 of the present application.
Since the right to sue inheres/survives with the legal heirs
of deceased respondent No.2, detailed in Paragraph-3 of the
application, therefore, they are ordered to be brought on record.
For the bona fide reasons stated/ sufficient cause shown in
the present application, delay in bringing on record the legal heirs
of deceased respondent No.2, is condoned and abatement, if
any, is set aside.
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
The application stands disposed of. Amended memo of
parties be filed within two weeks.
.
RSA No.299 of 2011
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the
newly added respondents, i.e., respondents No.2(a) to 2(c),
returnable within four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 24, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Govind Ram vs. Dila Ram (deceased) through LRs.
a/w connected matter
RSA No.210 of 2007 a/w
.
RSA No.216 of 2007
24.06.2025 Present: Ms. Rinki Kashmiri, Advocate, vice Mr. Janesh Gupta,
Advocate, for the appellants, in both the appeals.
Mr. Anand Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Karan
Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.1(a) to 1(c), 1(e) &
1(f), in both the appeals.
Respondent No.1(d), is stated to have expired.
Let consequential steps for bringing on record the legal
heirs of deceased respondent No.1(d) be taken within four weeks.
List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 24, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Roshan Lal vs. Durga Dass and others
RSA No.138 of 2025
.
24.06.2025 Present: Mr. G.R. Palsra, Advocate, for the appellant.
RSA No.138 of 2025
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the
respondents, returnable within four weeks. Notices have been
issued on substantial question of law No.1 framed at Page-11 of
the paper book.
CMP No.14136 of 2025
Notice in the aforesaid terms.
In the meanwhile, respondents are restrained from
interfering and blocking the path which leads to the house of the
applicant/appellant.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 24, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Hans Raj and another vs. Shyam Lal and others
RFA No.269 of 2003
.
23.06.2025 Present: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Atharv
Sharma, Advocate, for the appellants.
Names of respondents No.1 to 5 stand deleted.
Mr. K.D. Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Akash Thakur,
Advocate, for respondents No.4 and 6/ applicants.
Ms. Bhuvnesh Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rupesh,
Advocate, for respondents No.9 and 10.
Let amended memo of parties be filed on or before the
next date of hearing.
As prayed, list on 28.07.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 23, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Hans Raj and another vs. Shyam Lal and others
RFA No.269 of 2003
.
23.06.2025 Present: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Atharv
Sharma, Advocate, for the appellants.
Names of respondents No.1 to 5 stand deleted.
Mr. K.D. Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Akash Thakur,
Advocate, for respondents No.4 and 6/ applicants.
Ms. Bhuvnesh Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rupesh,
Advocate, for respondents No.9 and 10.
Let amended memo of parties be filed on or before the
next date of hearing.
As prayed, list on 28.07.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 23, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Sandhya Devi vs. Mati Raj and others
RSA No.273 of 2024
.
23.06.2025 Present: Mr. G.R. Palsra, Advocate, for the appellant.
Ms Anita, Advocate, vice Ms. Madhurika Sekhon Verma,
Advocate, for respondent No.1.
None for respondent No.2.
Record stands received.
same.
r to
Learned counsel for the parties intend to go through the
List for consideration after six weeks. Amended memo of
parties be filed in the meanwhile.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 23, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Bhagwanti vs. Sesi (deceased) through LRs.
RSA No.296 of 2023
.
23.06.2025 Present: Mr. K.D. Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Akash Thakur,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Dibender Ghosh, Advocate, for the respondents.
Record stands received.
Learned counsel for the parties intend to go through the
same.
List for consideration after six weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 23, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Bhagwani Devi vs. Krishan Murti and others
RSA No.100 of 2023
.
23.06.2025 Present: Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate, vice Mr. Varun Rana,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Anil Kumar Jaswal, Advocate, for the respondents.
Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of the
appellants submits that the original counsel is unavailable today
Prayer allowed.
r to
on account of personal difficulty. He seeks an adjournment.
As prayed, list on 15.07.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 23, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Satish Kumar vs. Sub Divisional Officer and others
CMPMO No.231 of 2021
.
23.06.2025 Present: Mr. Tarun Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Gautam Sood, Deputy Advocate General, for
respondent No.1-State.
Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Atharv
Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.3 to 5 & 7 to 12.
At the request of learned counsel appearing on behalf of
the petitioner, list on 30.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 23, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
M.C. Dharamshala vs. Tek Chand and another
CMPMO No.631 of 2024
.
23.06.2025 Present: Mr. Virender Kumar, Advocate, vice Mr. Mukul Sood,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. K.D. Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Akash Thakur,
Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.2/State.
CMP No.7878 of 2025
Reply, if any, be filed within two weeks. Rejoinder thereto
be filed within two weeks thereafter. List after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 23, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Bangali Ram (deceased) through LRs. vs. Tulsi Ram
(deceased) through LRs.
RSA No.266 of 2024
.
23.06.2025 Present: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Tarun Brakta,
Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Pranjal Munjal, Advocate, for respondents No.1(a) &
1(b).
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that
respondent No.1(b) has been incorrectly named as Sanjay Kumar
instead of Satish Kumar. Let amended memo of parties be filed
by the appellants depicting therein the name of respondent
No.1(b) as Satish Kumar instead of Sanjay Kumar.
Let the needful be done within three weeks. List
thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 23, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Bhupinder Pal Mahajan vs. State of HP and others
Civil Suit No.80 of 2024
.
23.06.2025 Present: Mr. Vishwas Kaushal, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondents/State.
Replication, if any, be filed within four weeks. List
thereafter.
June 23, 2025 (KS)
to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Rajesh Kumar and others vs. Prakash Chand
(deceased) through LRs. and others
RSA No.65 of 2024
.
23.06.2025 Present: Mr. Divya Raj Singh, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Atharv
Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.1(a) to 1(e).
Name of respondent No.4 stands deleted.
None for respondents No.2, 3, 6, 8(i), 8(ii), 8(iii) & 8(v)
already ex parte vide order dated 17.09.2024.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants
submits that the correct address of respondent No.8(iv) stands
filed and steps for the service of such respondent shall be taken
within three days. On taking such steps, issue notice to the said
respondent, returnable within four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 23, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
The CEO cum Secretary and another vs. Pohu Lal
(deceased) through LRs. and others
RFA No.58 of 2024
.
23.06.2025 Present: Mr. Devender K. Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. C.N. Singh,
Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. V.S. Chauhan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Arsh
Chauhan, Advocate, for respondents No.1(i) to 1(v) and
2(i).
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondents No.4 and 5/State.
Respondent No.3 is stated to have expired.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants
submits that objections in the application filed for bringing on
record legal heirs of deceased respondent No.3 have been
removed today itself. If in order, let the application be placed on
record. List after two weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 23, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Jitender Sood and another vs. North Star Outdoor
Media and others
Civil Suit No.10 of 2024
.
23.06.2025 Present: Mr. Virender Kumar, Advocate, vice Mr. Mukul Sood,
Advocate, for the plaintiffs.
Mr. Kulwant Singh Gill, Advocate, for defendants No.2 and
3.
OMP No.857 of 2025
r to
Reply, if any, be filed within four weeks. List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 23, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
N.S.L. Masli Power Generation Power Limited vs.
Bhagat Singh (deceased) through LRs. and others
CMP(M) No.1606 of 2023
.
23.06.2025 Present: Ms. Shalini Thakur, Advocate, for the applicant/ appellant.
Mr. B.M. Chauhan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Amit Himalvi,
Advocate for, respondents No.3(a) to 3(d).
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondents No.4 and 5/State.
Respondents No.1(a) to 1(e), 2 and 6(a) to 6(e) already ex
parte.
Reply is stated to have been filed on behalf of respondents
No.4 and 5. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the
copy of the same stands received by her. However, the same is
not on record.
Registry to trace the reply so filed and place it on record
well before the next date of hearing, post removal of objection(s),
if any.
List for consideration after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 23, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Vinod Kumar vs. Om Prakash and another
RSA No.222 of 2023
.
23.06.2025 Present: Mr. Vikrant Chandel, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. G.R. Palsra, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Respondent No.2 proceeded against ex parte vide order
dated 11.05.2023.
RSA No.222 of 2023
At the time of filing of the present appeal, an application for
condonation of delay has been filed. It is in the said application
that respondent No.2 had been proceeded against ex parte vide
order dated 11.05.2023. Post registration of the appeal, no notice
has been issued to respondent No.2.
In the aforesaid facts and attending circumstances, let
steps for the service of respondent No.2 be taken within three
days. On taking such steps, issue notice to respondent No.2,
returnable within four weeks.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that an
appropriate application for placing on record additional substantial
question of law has been filed. However, the same is not on
record.
Registry to trace the application so filed and place it on
record well before the next date of hearing, post removal of
objection(s), if any.
List after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 23, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Preeti Dhiman vs. Sandeep Chauhan and others
CMPMO No.214 of 2023
.
23.06.2025 Present: Ms. Vandana Misra, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Jagmohan Singh Chandel, Advocate, for respondent
No.1.
CMP No.4154 of 2025
Reply, if any, be filed within four weeks. List thereafter.
However, it is made clear that if reply is not filed on or
before the next date of hearing, then the right to file the same
shall stand closed without further reference to this Court.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 23, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Veena Devi and another vs. Jagpal Singh and others
CMPMO No.81 of 2023
.
23.06.2025 Present: Mr. Karan Singh Kanwar, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Desh Raj Thakur, Advocate, for respondents No.1, 2, 3
and 5.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that an
appropriate application for bringing on record the legal heirs of
deceased respondent No.4 has been prepared and the same
shall be filed within the course of the week.
As prayed, list after one week.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 23, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
M/s Ruchira Papers Limited and another vs. M/s I.D.
Packing and another
Civil Suit No.30 of 2023
.
23.06.2025 Present: Mr. Dinkar Bhaskar, Advocate, vice Mr. Naresh Verma,
Advocate, for the plaintiffs.
Mr. J.P. Sharma, Advocate, for defendant No.2.
Civil Suit No.30 of 2023
Replication, if any, be filed within four weeks. List
thereafter. r
OMP Nos.859 & 860 of 2025
Reply, if any, be filed on or before the next date of hearing.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 23, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Prem Chand vs. Amar Chand and others
CMPMO No.333 of 2021
.
23.06.2025 Present: Mr. Digvijay Singh Bisht, Advocate, vice Mr. B.C. Verma,
advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Shekhar Badola, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 5.
The matter is being listed before the Court after January,
2022. Learned counsel for the respondent seeks time to file
power of attorney and reply.
Let the needful be done within four weeks. List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 23, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Monika Devi vs. Hemant Kaushal
CMPMO No.299 of 2021
.
23.06.2025 Present: Mr. Baljinder Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Jagat Pal, Advocate, for the respondent.
The matter is being listed before the Court after
September, 2022. Parties jointly submit that during the
interregnum, the matter inter se parties has been amicably
settled. They seek time to have instructions in the matter.
As jointly prayed, list on 30.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 23, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Surma (deceased) through LR Sanjeev Thakur vs.
Durma (deceased) through LRs.
RSA No.188 of 2021
.
23.06.2025 Present: Ms. Akanksha, Advocate, vice Mr. Vivek Sharma,
Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. B.M. Chauhan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Amit Himalvi,
Advocate for respondents No.1(i) to 1(iii).
Learned counsel appearing on behalf the appellant
submits that an appropriate application has been filed for
permitting the appellant to place on record certified copy of the
trial Court judgment. However, the same is not on record.
Registry to trace the application so filed and place it on
record well before the next date of hearing, post removal of
objection(s), if any.
List after three weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 23, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Ashwani Kumar vs. Garima
CMPMO No.172 of 2020
.
23.06.2025 Present: Ms. Annanya Verma and Mr. Sunny Modgill, Advocate, for
the petitioner, through video conferencing.
Mr. Parmod Singh Thakur, Advocate, for the respondent.
The matter is being listed before the Court after February,
2020. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner
seeks time to complete his brief.
As jointly prayed, list on 08.07.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 23, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Amarjeet Kaur vs. Vivek Vardhan
CMPMO No.959 of 2019
.
23.06.2025 Present: Ms. Akanksha, Advocate, vice Mr. Vivek Sharma,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Jagat Pal, Advocate, for the respondent.
CMPMO No.959 of 2019
The matter is being listed before the Court after January,
2020. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner
seeks time to have instructions in the matter.
List on 30.06.2025.
CMP No.14940 of 2019
Reply, if any, be filed on or before the next date of hearing.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 23, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Leela vs. Pritam Singh and others
CMPMO No.55 of 2019
.
23.06.2025 Present: Mr. Gaurav Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner.
The matter is being listed before the Court after April,
2019. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner
seeks time to file fresh power of attorney as the original counsel
has now been designated as Senior Advocate. Prayer allowed.
Let the needful be done within four weeks. List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 23, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
General Manager, Northern Railways vs. Rattan Chand
(deceased) through LRs. and others
RFA No.266 of 2014 a/w
.
RFA No.322 of 2015
23.06.2025 Present: Mr. Nand Lal Thakur, Senior Panel Counsel, for the
appellant(s), in both the appeals.
Respondent No.1 is stated to have expired.
Ms Kavita Kajal, Advocate, vice Mr. Atharv Sharma,
Advocate, for respondents No.2 and 3 in RFA No.266 of
2014 and for respondents No.2, 4 and 5 in RFA No.322 of
2015.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondents/State, in both the appeals.
As prayed, list on 11.07.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 23, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
M/s Krishna Jewellers and others vs. M/s Satya
Jewellers and another
RFA No.347 of 2014
.
23.06.2025 Present: Mr. Y.P. Sood and Mr. Parveen Chauhan, Advocates, for
the appellants.
Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocate, for the respondents.
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that qua the
adequacy of the solvent security furnished before the execution
Court in terms of order dated 01.05.2025, he has filed an
application in the Registry of this Court. However, the same is
not on record.
Registry to trace the application so filed and place it on
record well before the next date of hearing, post removal of
objection(s), if any.
List after two weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 23, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Jeet Ram vs. Lajwanti and others
RSA No.4143 of 2013
.
23.06.2025 Present: Mr. Sumit Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. J.N. Kenan, Advocate, vice Mr. Tek Chand Sharma,
Advocate, for respondents No.1(a) to 1(e).
None for remaining respondents.
Steps for the service of respondent No.13 (post admission)
be taken within a week.
On taking such steps, issue notice to the said respondent,
returnable within four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 23, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Shanti Devi and others vs. Tula Ram and others
RSA No.699 of 2012
.
23.06.2025 Present: Mr. Pranjal Munjal, Advocate, vice Mr. Janesh Gupta,
Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Ashok Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rajat,
Advocate, for respondents No.6 to 8.
CMP No.13616 of 2025
Hearing, in the case at hand, was expedited vide order
dated 09.01.2019. In view thereof and for the reasons stated in
the application, early hearing of the appeal is allowed. The
application stands disposed of.
RSA No.699 of 2012
List the appeal for hearing in the 3rd week of August,
2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 23, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Kishan Chand vs. Rasila Ram (deceased) through LRs.
and others
.
RSA No.544 of 2012
23.06.2025 Present: Mr. Dinkar Bhaskar, Advocate, vice Mr. Naresh K. Verma,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Pranjal Munjal, Advocate, vice Mr. Janesh Gupta,
Advocate, for proposed respondents No.1(a) to 1(c).
None for respondents No.2, 3, 5 & 6.
r to
CMP(M) No.220 and 221 of 2025
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicants. Legal heirs of deceased respondent No.4 stand
served, however there is no appearance on their behalf. The non
applicants have no objection, if in case the applications are
allowed and the legal heirs of deceased respondent No.4 are
brought on record as is being sought in the application (CMP(M)
No.220 of 2025).
Respondent No.4 is stated to have expired on 18.03.2024.
The same is evident form the Death Certificate appended along-
with the application (CMP(M) No.220 of 2025). The details of the
legal heirs are given in Paragraph-3 of the application (CMP(M)
No.220 of 2025).
Since the right to sue inheres/survives in the legal heirs of
deceased respondent No.4, detailed in Paragraph-3 of the
application (CMP(M) No.220 of 2024), therefore, they are ordered
to be brought on record.
For the bona fide reasons stated/sufficient cause shown in
the application (CMP(M) No.221 of 2025), delay in bringing on
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
record the legal heirs of deceased respondent No.4, is condoned
.
and abatement, if any, is set aside.
The applications stand disposed of. Amended memo of
parties filed with the applications is ordered to be taken on record.
RSA No.544 of 2012
On taking steps within a week, issue notice to the newly
added respondents, i.e., respondents No.4(a) to 4(c), returnable
within four weeks. List thereafter.
CMP No.3082 of 2025
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is
allowed. The applicant is exempted from filing the true typed
copy of Annexure A-1 appended along-with CMP(M) No.220 of
2025. The application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 23, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Rakesh Sharma and others vs. Bhushan Lal and
others a/w connected matter
RFA No.272 of 2003 a/w
.
RFA No.276 of 2003
21.06.2025 Present: Mr. Tara Singh Chauhan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Arun
Kaushal, Advocate, for the appellants, in RFA No.272 of
2003 and for respondent No.5 in RFA No.276 of 2003.
Mr. Sahil Dixit, Advocate, for the appellants in RFA No.276
of 2003 and for respondents No.2(a) to 2(c) in RFA No.272
of 2003.
Mr. Rahul Gathania, Advocate, for respondent No.1, in
both the appeals.
None for respondent No.4 in RFA No.276 of 2003.
Respondent No.3 in RFA No.272 of 2003 is exparte.
Heard further. List for continuation, on 28.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 21, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Rajinder Kumar vs. Chaya Devi and others a/w
connected matter
Civil Revision No.2 of 2016 a/w
.
Civil Revision No.27 of 2021
Civil Revision No.2 of 2016
21.06.2025 Present:
Ms. Meera Devi, Advocate, vice Mr. Deepak Gupta,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Rohit, Advocate, vice Mr. Sumit Sood, Advocate, for
respondents No.1 to 4.
Mr. Atul G. Sood, Advocate, for respondents No.5 to 7.
Civil Revision No.27 of 2021
Mr. Rohit, Advocate, vice Mr. Sumit Sood, Advocate, for the
petitioner.
Mr. Atul G. Sood, Advocate, for for the respondents.
At the request of learned counsel for the petitioner in Civil
Revision No.27 of 2021 and for respondents No.1 to 4 in Civil
Revision No.2 of 2016, matter is adjourned.
List on 09.07.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 21, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Virender Tiwari vs. Balwant Singh
RSA No. No.125 of 2025
.
21.06.2025 Present: Mr. Ankit Dhiman, Advocate, for the appellant.
RSA No.125 of 2025
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the
respondent, returnable within four weeks. Notice has been
issued on substantial question of law No.3 framed at Pages-13 &
14 of the paper book.
CMP No.13923 of 2025
Notice in the aforesaid terms.
In the meanwhile, operation and implementation of
impugned judgment and decree dated 01.04.2025, passed by
learned Additional District Judge, Paonta Sahib, in Civil Appeal
No.74-N/13 of 2019 shall remain stayed.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 21, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Nirmala vs. Vikrant Singh and others
RSA No.293 of 2023
.
21.06.2025 Present: Mr. Servedaman, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Rupinder Singh Thakur, Advocate, for respondents No.1
to 3.
Mr. Vipin Bhatia, Advocate, for respondent No.4.
After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the
not opposed.
List on 26.06.2025.
appellant, seeks further time to prepare the case at hand. Prayer
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 21, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
State of HP and another vs. Yoginder Pal and others
CMPMO No.659 of 2023
.
21.06.2025 Present: Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the petitioners/State.
Mr. Jia Lal, Advocate, vice Mr. G.R. Palsra, Advocate, for
respondents No.1 and 3.
Mr. Yoginder Pal, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of respondents
No.1 & 3 submits that the original counsel is unavailable today on
account of personal difficulty. He seeks an adjournment. Prayer
allowed.
List for consideration after eight weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 21, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Leela Devi vs. State of HP and another
RSA No.356 of 2022
.
21.06.2025 Present: Mr. Varun Chauhan, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. H.S. Rawat, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.1/State.
None for respondent No.2.
Despite repeated calls, there is no appearance on behalf
of respondent No.2. In the interest of justice, list after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 21, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Haviv Gil vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Cr.MP(M) No.1434 of 2025
.
21.06.2025 Present: Mr. Anubhav Chopra, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. H.S. Rawat, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
Notice. Mr. H.S. Rawat, learned Additional Advocate
General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the
respondent-State and seeks time to file status report.
List on 24.06.2025 before the appropriate Bench. Status
report be filed on or before the next date of hearing.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 21, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Mohit vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Cr.MP(M) No.1432 of 2025
.
21.06.2025 Present: Mr. Parikshit Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. H.S. Rawat, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
List on 24.06.2025 before the appropriate Bench.
June 21, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Tarun vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Cr.MP(M) No.1428 of 2025
.
21.06.2025 Present: Mr. Parikshit Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. H.S. Rawat, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
List on 24.06.2025 before the appropriate Bench.
June 21, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Parveen vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Cr.MP(M) No.1427 of 2025
.
21.06.2025 Present: Mr. Parikshit Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. H.S. Rawat, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
List on 24.06.2025 before the appropriate Bench.
June 21, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Kulvender vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Cr.MP(M) No.1426 of 2025
.
21.06.2025 Present: Mr. Parikshit Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. H.S. Rawat, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
List on 24.06.2025 before the appropriate Bench.
June 21, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Anku vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Cr.MP(M) No.1433 of 2025
.
21.06.2025 Present: Mr. Vijender Katoch, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. H.S. Rawat, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
List on 26.06.2025 before the appropriate Bench.
June 21, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Vishnu Das Vaishnav vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Cr.MP(M) No.1429 of 2025
.
21.06.2025 Present: Mr. Anshul Jairath, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. H.S. Rawat, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
List on 26.06.2025 before the appropriate Bench.
June 21, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Ratti Ram @ Chinda Ram vs. State of HP and others
CWP No.9967 of 2025
.
21.06.2025 Present: Mr. Karan Kapoor, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. H.S. Rawat, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
List on 26.06.2025 before the appropriate Bench.
June 21, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Usha Gupta vs. Deepti Gupta and another
Cr. MMO No.542 of 2025
.
21.06.2025 Present: Mr. Deepak Bhasin, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sambhav
Bhasin, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. H.S. Rawat, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
List on 23.06.2025 before the appropriate Bench.
June 21, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Anup Singh vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Cr. Appeal No.294 of 2025
.
21.06.2025 Present: Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate, vice Ms. Vidushi Sharma,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. H.S. Rawat, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
List on 26.06.2025 before the appropriate Bench.
June 21, 2025 (KS)
to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Jagat Singh Negi vs. Professor Prem Kumar Dhumal
Cr. Revision No.196 of 2024
.
21.06.2025 Present: Mr. L.S. Mehta, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Karun Negi, Advocate, for respondent No.1/State.
Mr. Anshul Attri, Advocate, for respondents No.2, 5, 6, 8
and 9.
Mr. Vikas Rathore, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
Mr. Abhishek Verma, Advocate, for respondent No.4.
Mr. Ram Lal Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.7.
Mr. C.D. Negi, Advocate, for respondent No.10.
List on 26.06.2025 before the appropriate Bench.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 21, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Ram Lal and another vs. State of HP and others
Cr.MMO No.231 of 2025
.
21.06.2025 Present: Mr. Vinod Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. H.S. Rawat, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.1/State.
None for respondents No.2 to 4.
List on 26.06.2025 before the appropriate Bench.
r ( Bipin C. Negi )
June 21, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Ishwar Thakur and others vs. State of HP and another
Cr. Revision No.89 of 2025
.
21.06.2025 Present: Mr. Karun Negi, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. H.S. Rawat, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.1/State.
Mr. R.L. Verma, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
List on 26.06.2025 before the appropriate Bench.
r ( Bipin C. Negi )
June 21, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Pramod Kumar vs. State of HP and another
Cr.MP(M) No.1022 of 2025
.
21.06.2025 Present: Mr. Vinod Chauhan, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. H.S. Rawat, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.1/State.
Mr. Sarthak Mehta, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
List on 25.06.2025 before the appropriate Bench.
r ( Bipin C. Negi )
June 21, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
State of HP and others vs. Ram Lal
CMP(M) No.700 of 2025
.
21.06.2025 Present: Mr. H.S. Rawat, Additional Advocate General, for the
petitioners/State.
List on 25.06.2025 before the appropriate Bench.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 21, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Gopal Krishan vs. Bimla Kumari and another
OMP No.69 of 2024 in C.S. No.1 of 2020
.
21.06.2025 Present: Mr. Het Ram Thakur, Advocate, for the non-applicant/
plaintiff.
Mr. Ishan Sharma, Advocate, for the applicant/defendant
No.1.
Ms. Shreya Chauhan, Advocate, for the non-applicant/
defendant No.2.
List on 25.06.2025 before the appropriate Bench.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 21, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
I.D. Sood Ispat Pvt. Ltd. and another vs. State of HP
Cr.MMO No.532 of 2025
.
21.06.2025 Present: Mr. S.D. Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. H.S. Rawat, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
List on 25.06.2025 before the appropriate Bench.
June 21, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Dr. Denchan Aagmai vs. State of HP and another
Cr.MMO No.531 of 2025
.
21.06.2025 Present: Mr. Harsh Sharol, Advocate, vice Mr. Manoj Pathak,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. H.S. Rawat, Additional Advocate General, the
respondent/State.
List on 25.06.2025 before the appropriate Bench.
June 21, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
Naresh Kumar and others vs. State of HP and another
Cr.MMO No.1231 of 2024
.
21.06.2025 Present: Mr. Dhiraj Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. H.S. Rawat, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.1/State.
Ms. Shikha Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
List on 25.06.2025 before the appropriate Bench.
June 21, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:32 :::CIS
The CEO-cum-Secretary vs. Gurbakash (deceased)
through LRs. and others
CMP No.6322 of 2024 in RFA No.89 of 2021
.
20.06.2025 Present: Mr. Jeevesh Sharma, Advocates, vice Mr. R.L. Sharma,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Dr. Rajesh Kumar Parmar, Advocate, for respondents
No.1(a), 2 to 5.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondents No.6 to 8/State.
CMP No.6322 of 2024
r to
The right to file reply by the non-applicant was closed vide
order dated 16.12.2024.
As jointly prayed, list for consideration after one week.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 20, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Neha Grover vs. PNB and others a/w connected
matters
RSA No.125 of 2024 a/w RSA Nos.128, 129 of 2022 and
.
136 of 2024
RSA No.125 of 2024
20.06.2025 Present: Mr. Varun Chauhan, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Rohit, Advocate, vice Mr. Sumit Sood, Advocate, for
respondent No.1.
Mr. T.C. Verma, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
Mr. Pranjal Munjal, Advocate, vice Mr. Janesh Gupta,
Advocate, for respondent No.4.
RSA Nos.128 & 129 of 2022
Mr. Pranjal Munjal, Advocate, vice Mr. Janesh Gupta,
Advocate, for the appellant(s), in both the appeals.
Mr. Rohit, Advocate, vice Mr. Sumit Sood, Advocate, for
respondent No.1.
Mr. T.C. Verma, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
None for respondents No.3 & 4.
RSA No.136 of 2024
Mr. Varun Chauhan, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Rohit, Advocate, vice Mr. Sumit Sood, Advocate, for
respondent No.1.
Mr. T.C. Verma, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
Mr. Pranjal Munjal, Advocate, vice Mr. Janesh Gupta,
Advocate, for respondent No.4.
CMP No.13208 of 2025 in RSA No.125 of 2024
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicants. Vide order dated 13.03.2025, respondent No.3 was
ordered to be served through publication in the newspaper “The
Tribune (Bathinda Edition)”.
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
.
By virtue of the present application, it is pointed out that
respondent No.3 is resident of Ambala, Haryana. Therefore, it is
prayed that order dated 13.03.2025 be modified to the extent that
the publication for effecting service of respondent No.3 be made
in the “The Tribune (Ambala Edition)”, instead of “Bathinda
Edition”.
For the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, the
application is allowed. Order dated 13.03.2025 is modified to the
extent as is being sought. Let steps for the service of respondent
No.3 be taken by the appellants in terms of order dated
13.03.2025 and 02.05.2025. Service be got effected through
publication in the newspaper, “The Tribune (Ambala Edition)”.
Let expenses for the publication be deposited within ten
days from today. Notice be published for 30.07.2025.
The Publisher of the newspaper is directed to send the
printed material under the postal certificate to respondent No.3,
on his given address, the proof whereof, be submitted to this
Court on or before the next date of hearing.
The application stands disposed of.
RSA No.125 of 2024
List on 05.08.2025.
CMP No.10876 of 2024 in RSA No.128 of 2024
Respondent No.2-Manoj Kumar stands duly represented
by Mr. T.C. Verma, learned counsel who has already filed power
of attorney on his behalf. Hence, the present application has
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
become infructuous. The application stands disposed of
.
accordingly.
RSA No.128 of 2024 & RSA No.129 of 2022
Mr. T.C. Verma, learned Advocate has put in appearance
on behalf of respondent No.3. Let power of attorney on his behalf
be filed on or before the next date of hearing.
List on 05.08.2025.
CMP No.10877 of 2024 in RSA No.129 of 2022
Respondent No.2-Manoj Kumar stands duly represented
by Mr. T.C. Verma, learned counsel, who has already filed power
of attorney on his behalf. Hence, the present application has
become infructuous. The application stands disposed of
accordingly.
RSA No.136 of 2024
Respondent No.3 is the same as respondent No.3 in RSA
No.125 of 2024. Service of respondent No.3 in connected RSA
No.125 of 2024 is being effected through publication in the
newspaper, “The Tribune (Ambala Edition)”.
Mention of the present appeal be also made in the
publication so being made on 30.07.2025 for effecting service of
respondent No.3 in RSA No.125 of 2024.
List on 05.08.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 20, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Som Krishan and others vs. Tirath Ram (deceased)
through LRs. and others
RSA No.77 of 2013
.
20.06.2025 Present: Ms. Kusum Chaudhary, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. G.R. Palsra, Advocate, for respondents No.1(a) to
1(d).
Mr. Hemant Thakur, Advocate, for respondents No.3(i) to
3(v).
CMP No.13832 of 2025
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicants. Respondent No.1(e)(i) and 1(e)(ii) were brought on
record after the death of respondent No.1(e). In this regard, an
appropriate application being CMP(M) No.582 of 2024 had been
filed. In the said application, the aforesaid two legal heirs were
served for 23.08.2024. Despite service, no power of attorney has
been filed on their behalf. The application for bringing on record
the legal heirs of deceased respondent No.1(e), i.e., CMP(M)
No.582 of 2024 was allowed vide order dated 04.10.2024. In the
said order and ever since then, name of Mr. Lokesh Thakur,
Advocate, vice Mr. G.R. Palsra, learned Advocate is being
reflected as representing the aforesaid legal heirs of deceased
respondent No.1(e), i.e., respondents No.1(e)(i) and 1(e)(ii).
By virtue of the present application, learned counsels
Mr. G.R. Palsra and Mr. Lokesh Thakur submit that their
presence is being wrongly recorded for the aforesaid two legal
heirs.
In view thereof, the present application is allowed.
Henceforth, names of Mr. G.R. Palsra and Mr. Lokesh Thakur,
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Advocates, be not reflected in the cause list as counsels for legal
.
heirs of deceased respondent No.1(e), i.e. respondent No.1(e)(i)
and 1(e)(ii). The application stands disposed of.
RSA No.77 of 2013
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to
respondent No.1(e)(i) and 1(e)(ii), returnable within four weeks.
June 20, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Narayan Dass vs. Lekh Ram and another
CMP(M) No.1376 of 2024
.
20.06.2025 Present: Mr. Ashok Kumar Tyagi, Advocate, for the applicant-
appellant.
Mr. Naveen K. Bhardwaj, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Respondent No.2 proceeded against ex parte vide order
dated 11.12.2024 of learned Additional Registrar (Judicial).
Rejoinder is stated to have been filed. However, the same
are not on record. Learned counsel for respondent No.1 submits
that he has received the copy of the same.
Registry to trace the rejoinder so filed and place it on
record well before the next date of hearing, post removal of
objection(s), if any.
List after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 20, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Shefali Sahni vs. Brij Singha and others
Civil Suit No.40 of 2024
.
20.06.2025 Present: Ms. Drishti Sirswal, Advocate, vice Mr. Kartik Kumar,
Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Mr. Romesh Verma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sumit
Sharma, Advocate, for defendants No.1 & 2.
Mr. Tejasvi Verma, Advocate, for defendant No.3.
Defendants No.4 and 6 are ex parte.
weeks.
OMP No.467 of 2024
Pleadings are complete. List for consideration after two
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 20, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
State of HP and another vs. Babu Ram Gupta
(deceased) through LRs. and others
.
CMP(M) No.245 of 2024
20.06.2025 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
petitioners/State.
Learned Additional Advocate General submits that an
appropriate application for deletion of name of respondent No.3
has been filed. However, the same is not on record.
Registry to trace the application so filed and place it on
record well before the next date of hearing, post removal of
objection(s), if any.
List after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 20, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Anju vs. State of HP and another
CMPMO No.608 of 2023
.
20.06.2025 Present: Mr. Tek Chand, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.1/State.
Respondent No.2 proceeded against ex parte vide
Additional Registrar (Judicial) order dated 19.12.2023.
CMP No.16107/2023
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the
respondents.
Interim order dated 09.11.2023 is made absolute. The
application stands disposed of.
CMPMO No.608/2023
As jointly prayed, list for consideration on 28.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 20, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Jagdish Chand vs. Sulochna Mittal
CMPMO No.264 of 2021
.
20.06.2025 Present: Mr. Rajneesh K. Lal, Advocate, for the petitioner.
None for the respondent.
As prayed, list on 28.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 20, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Kishori Lal and others vs. Surinder Kumar and others
RSA No.198 of 2020
.
20.06.2025 Present: Mr. Naresh Kumar Sharma, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Vinod Thakur, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 3.
Ms. Manisha Kumari, Advocate, for respondents No.4 & 5.
CMP No.8022 of 2024
Reply, if any, be filed within three weeks. List thereafter.
RSA No.198 of 2020
Record stands received.
Learned counsel for the parties intend to go through the
same.
List for consideration after three weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 20, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Chandresh Kumari vs. Divisional Commissioner and
others
CMPMO No.758 of 2019
.
20.06.2025 Present: Mr. Shubham Negi, Advocate, vice Mr. J.R. Poswal,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondents/State.
CMP No.13110 of 2019
CMPMO No.758 of 2019
r to
Reply, if any, be filed within four weeks. List thereafter.
True typed copies of the documents as had been directed
vide order dated 21.11.2019 be positively filed on or before the
next date of hearing. List after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 20, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Prabha Sarin and others vs. LAC and others a/w
connected matter
RFA No.269 of 2018 a/w RFA No.270 of 2018
.
RFA No.269 of 2018
20.06.2025 Present: Mr. Paras Dhaulta, Advocate, for all the appellants in RFA
No.269 of 2018, except appellant No.6, who is stated to
have expired.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.1/State.
Mr. Yug Singhal and Mr. Hitender Verma, Advocates, for
respondent No.2.
RFA No.270 of 2018
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
appellant/State.
Mr. Paras Dhaulta, Advocate, for respondents No.1, 2, 3
and 6.
Mr. Yug Singhal and Mr. Hitender Verma, Advocates, for
respondent No.4.
RFA No.269 of 2018 & RFA No.270 of 2018
Order dated 02.05.2025 be positively complied with on or
before the next date of hearing. Time to complying with the
directions contained therein is being sought since long. List after
four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 20, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Amar Nath and others vs. Shambu Dutt and others
RSA No.226 of 2010
.
20.06.2025 Present: Mr. Rohit, Advocate, vice Mr. Sumit Sood, Advocate, for
the appellants.
Mr. Shivam Sharma and Ms. Anita Dogra, Advocates, for
respondents No.2.
Respondent No.1 is stated to have expired.
Respondents No.3 to 7 proceeded against ex parte vide
order dated 06.07.2010.
r to
CMP(M) No.917 of 2025
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the legal
heirs of deceased respondent No.1, details whereof, have been
given in Paragraph-3 of the application, returnable within four
weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 20, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Lekh Raj and others vs. Bheem Chand (deceased)
through LRs. and others
CMPMO No.326 of 2025
.
20.06.2025 Present: Mr. Avinash Jaryal, Advocate, for the petitioners.
CMPMO No.326/2025
Notice, at this stage confined to the legal heirs of
deceased respondents No.1 and respondent No.2, be issued on
taking steps within three days, returnable within four weeks. No
notices are being issued to proforma respondents, at this stage.
CMP No.13782 of 2025
Mere pendency of the present petition would not preclude
the trial Court from proceeding further in the matter. The
application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 20, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Narinder Thakur (since deceased) through LRs. And
others vs. Land Acquisition Collector, HPSEB and
others
.
CMPMO No.205 of 2025
19.06.2025 Present: Mr. Varun Chauhan, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Ms. Sunita Sharma, Senior Advocate with Ms. Sugandh
Verma, Advocate, for respondents No.1 and 3.
Mr. Manish Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for
respondent No.3.
same.
Record stands received.
Learned counsel for the parties intend to go through the
List for consideration after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 19, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Attar Singh and another vs. Banka Devi and others
RSA No.40 of 2025
.
19.06.2025 Present: None for the appellants.
Mr. Romesh Verma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sumit
Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.1 and 2.
Despite repeated calls, there is no appearance on behalf
of the appellants. In the interest of justice, list after four weeks.
June 19, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Rajeev Nag vs. Himachal Pradesh Wakf Board
Civil Revision No.38 of 2025
.
19.06.2025 Present: Mr. K.D. Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Surinder Saklani,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. R.K. Bawa, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ajay Kumar
Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf the parties to
ascertain the status of the suit pending before the trial Court.
List after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 19, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Bimla Devi vs. M/s Bittam Garages
CMP No.18779 of 2023 in
RSA No.310 of 2008
.
19.06.2025 Present: Mr. K.D. Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vivek Singh Thakur,
Advocate, for the applicant.
Mr. Bimal Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Trigun Singh
Negi, Advocate, for the respondent.
CMP No.18779 of 2023
Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the
pleadings.
The applicant, in the case at hand, was the appellant before
this Court in the Regular Second Appeal. On account of having
suffered a judgment and decree by both the Courts below, during
the pendency of the appeal before this Court, a sum of Rs.90,392/-
being decretal amount along-with interest has been deposited by the
present applicant/appellant on 07.01.2009 in the Registry of this
Court.
The non-applicant/respondent in the Regular Second Appeal
had moved an application for release of the amount so deposited.
Vide order dated 27.08.2010, the amount deposited by the present
applicant was ordered to be released in favour of the non-applicant/
respondent. However, the release was subject to the non-applicant
furnishing a requisite security. The needful was done and thereafter
the money was released.
However, subsequent to the allowing of the Regular Second
Appeal in favour of the present applicant/appellant, the non-
applicant had deposited the amount withdrawn along-with interest
accrued thereupon, on 27.11.2024.
Since the appeal has now been allowed in favour of the
present applicant/appellant, therefore, based on the security so
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
furnished in terms of order dated 27.08.2010, the present applicant
.
is entitled to release of amount, qua which a security had been
furnished by the present non-applicant/respondent.
The claim for any amount over and above the amount
secured by way of a security furnished by the non-applicant can only
be made by the present applicant by way of an application for
restitution.
In terms of law laid down by the Apex Court in State Bank of
Saurashtra vs. Chitranjan Rangnath Raja and Anr., AIR 1980 SC
1528 and on a bare reading of Section 144 of the Civil Procedure
Code, it is evident that where a decree or an order of a trial Court
has been set aside in an appeal or revision, it is only the Court of
first instance, which has been given a power to order restitution.
In view of the aforesaid, it is made clear that the applicant in
the present application is only entitled to release of amount secured
by the security furnished by the non-applicant in terms of order
dated 27.08.2010. For any over and above amount, in view of the
settled position of law stated here-in-above, an application for
restitution would only be maintainable before the trial Court.
The amount so deposited on 27.11.2024 along-with interest
accrued thereupon be released in favour of the applicant. The
amount be remitted to the bank account, details whereof have been
given in Paragraph-8 of the application, subject to proper
verification. The application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 19, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Ishwar Kumar vs. Vikas Sudan and another
Civil Revision No.156 of 2024
.
19.06.2025 Present: Mr. Nitin Soni, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Varun Chauhan, Advocate, for the proposed legal heris of
respondent No.1, who is stated to have expired.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.2/State.
CMP(M) No.656 of 2025
Proposed legal heirs of deceased respondent No.1 stand
served. Mr. Varun Chauhan, learned counsel, has put in
appearance on their behalf. He seeks and is granted two weeks’
time to file power of attorney.
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicants. The non-applicants have no objection, if in case, the
application is allowed and the legal heirs of deceased respondent
No.1, are brought on record as is being sought in the application.
Respondent No.1 is stated to have expired on 15.12.2024.
The same is evident from the Death Certificate appended along with
the present application. Deceased respondent No.1 is survived by
his legal heirs, details whereof, have been given in Paragraph-2 of
the present application. The same are in consonance with the details
mentioned in the Family Certificate appended along with the
application.
Since the right to sue inheres/survives with the legal heirs of
deceased respondent No.1, detailed in Paragraph-2 of the
application, therefore, they are ordered to be brought on record.
The application stands disposed of. Amended memo of
parties be filed within two weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 19, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Dharam Dass and others vs. Mohan Singh and others
RSA No.289 of 2024
.
19.06.2025 Present: Mr. Narender Singh Thakur, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. G.R. Palsra, Advocate, for the respondents.
CMP No.26315 of 2024
The present application is dismissed as withdrawn with
liberty reserved to file an appropriate application.
r to
The application stands disposed of accordingly.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 19, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
State of Himachal Pradesh and others vs. Ram Lal and
others
RFA No.26 of 2023
.
19.06.2025 Present: Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General,
for the appellants/State.
Mr. Mukesh Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Rajiv Rai,
Advocate, for respondent No.1.
The address of respondent No.2 be furnished to the
appellant by respondent No.1, who is the brother of respondent
No.2. r
Let the needful be done within two weeks. List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 19, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Harvant Singh Cheema vs. Raj Cheema
CMPMO No.46 of 2022
.
19.06.2025 Present: Mr. Parikshit Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Vandana Kuthiala, Advocate, for the proposed LRs. Of
respondent No.1, who is stated to have expired.
Mr. Balram Sharma, Deputy Solicitor General of India with
Mr. Jyotirmay Bhat, Advocate, for respondent No.2/Union
of India.
CMP No.26422 of 2024
Time to file reply is being sought since 01.01.2025
Let the needful be positively done within two weeks. List
thereafter.
However, it is made clear that if reply is not filed on or
before the next date of hearing, then the right to file the same
shall stand closed without further reference to this Court.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 19, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Dev Raj vs. The Sub Divisional Collector, Una and
others
CMPMO No.52 of 2021
.
19.06.2025 Present: Mr. Atul Jhingan, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General,
for respondents No.1 and 2/State.
Mr. Sahil Dixit, Advocate, for respondents No.3 to 11, 13,
14, 18, 19, 21 to 26 and 28 to 34.
Respondent No.20 is stated to have expired.
Respondents No.12, 15, 16, 17 and 35 to 44 are
proceeded against ex parte vide order dated 20.08.2021.
Further time prayed to comply with orders dated
20.08.2021 and 27.05.2025.
Let the needful be done within four weeks. List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 19, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
The State of HP and others vs. Tej Singh a/w
connected matters
RFA No.13 of 2018 a/w RFA Nos.201 & 309 of 2017, 32
.
and 33 of 2018
19.06.2025 Present: Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General,
for the appellants/State.
Mr. H.S. Rana and Mr. Sahil Dixit, Advocates, for the
respective respondents, in all the appeals, except
respondent No.5 and 5(a) in RFA No.13 of 2018, who are
stated to have expired.
CMP(M) Nos.543 & 544 of 2018 in RFA No.13 of 2018
Proposed respondents No.5(b) to 5(d) stand served.
However, none has put in appearance on their behalf.
Respondent No.5(a) is stated to have expired.
CMP(M) Nos.1567 & 1568 of 2022 in RFA No.13 of 2018
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the legal
heirs of deceased respondent No.5(a), details whereof have been
given in Paragraph-3 of the application (CMP(M) No.1567 of
2022), returnable within four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 19, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
State of HP and others vs. Satya Pal
CMP(M) No.651 of 2025
.
18.06.2025 Present: Mr. Manish Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for the
applicants-appellants.
Respondent in person.
The respondent after service is present in person. He
seeks time to engage a counsel and file reply.
Let the needful be done on or before the next date of
hearing. List on 03.07.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 18, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
State of HP and others vs. Satya Pal
CMP(M) No.651 of 2025
.
18.06.2025 Present: Mr. Manish Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for the
applicants-appellants.
Respondent in person.
The respondent after service is present in person. He
seeks time to engage a counsel and file reply.
Let the needful be done on or before the next date of
hearing. List on 03.07.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 18, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Ravinder Kumar Gupta vs. Devinder Kumar Sharma
CMPMO No.731 of 2024
.
18.06.2025 Present: Ms. Meera Devi, Advocate, vice Mr. Deepak Gupta,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. K.R. Thakur, Advocate, for the respondent.
Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner
submits that learned Senior Counsel, who is to argue the case, is
unavailable today on account of ill health, as he has been
hospitalized. She prays for an adjournment. Prayer not opposed.
List on 23.07.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 18, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
New India Assurance Company Limited vs. Parveen
Sood and another
CMPMO No.548 of 2024
.
18.06.2025 Present: Mr. B.M. Chauhan, Senior Advocate with Ms. Kamakshi
Tarlokta, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Bunesh Pal, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Naveen Kumar Bhardwaj, Advocate, for respondent
No.2.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.1
has placed reliance upon the decision of this Court in Oriental
Insurance Company Limited vs. Geeta and others, 2005 (3)
Shim. LC 274, specifically paragraph-13 thereof.
Faced with the aforesaid, learned counsel for the petitioner
seeks time to go through the same. List on 28.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 18, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Surender Kumar vs. Pankaj Bansal and another
CMPMO No.449 of 2024
.
18.06.2025 Present: Ms. Kanchan Singh, Advocate, vice Mr. Aditya Thakur,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Parikshit Sharma, Advocate, for the respondents.
Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner
submits that the original counsel is unavailable today on account
of ill health. She seeks an adjournment. Prayer allowed.
List for consideration after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 18, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Jeet Singh vs. Avinash
Civil Revision No.121 of 2024
.
18.06.2025 Present: Mr. Rocky, Advocate, vice Mr. Devinder K. Sharma,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. G.R. Palsra, Advocate, for the respondent.
Record stands received.
Learned counsel for the parties intend to go through the
same.
List for consideration after six weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 18, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Raminder Pal Singh vs. Sharmila and another
RFA No.20 of 2024
.
18.06.2025 Present: Mr. Kartik Kumar, Advocate, vice Mr. Tek Chand Sharma,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Respondent No.1 ex parte vide order dated 10.01.2025.
None for respondent No.2.
Mr. Virender Singh Kanwar, Advocate, for respondent
No.3.
Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant
submits that the original counsel is unavailable today on account
of personal difficulty. He seeks an adjournment. Prayer allowed.
List after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 18, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Kashmiro vs. Arun and others a/w with connected
matter
RSA No.203 of 2023 a/w RSA No.291 of 2022
.
RSA No.203 of 2023
18.06.2025 Present: Mr. Vikrant Chandel, Advocate, for the appellants.
Ms. Anita, Advocate, vice Ms. Anu Tuli Azta, Advocate, for
respondents No. 1 and 2.
Ms. Ritu, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
Ms. Vandana, Advocate, vice Mr. Sanjay Jaswal,
Advocate, for respondents No. 4,5 and 7.
Respondent No.6 ex-parte.
RSA No. 291 of 2022
Ms. Vandana, Advocate, vice Mr. Sanjay Jaswal,
Advocate, for the appellants.
Ms. Anita, Advocate, vice Ms. Anu Tuli Azta,
Advocate, for respondents No. 1 and 2.
Ms. Ritu, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
Respondent No.4 ex-parte.
Mr. Vikrant Chandel, Advocate, for respondent No.5.
Learned vice counsel appearing on behal of respondents
No.4, 5 and 7 and appellants in RSA No.291 of 2022 submits that
the original counsel is unavailable today on account of personal
difficulty. She seeks an adjournment. Prayer allowed.
List for consideration after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 18, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Munshi Ram vs. Rajiv Vaidya
RSA No.198 of 2023
.
18.06.2025 Present: Mr. Abhishek M. Goel, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Bimal Gupta, Senior Advocate with Ms. Kusum
Chaudhary, Advocate, for the respondent.
Further time prayed to comply with order dated
10.04.2025.
Let the needful be done within four weeks. List thereafter.
r ( Bipin C. Negi )
June 18, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Kashmir Singh vs. State of HP and others
CMPMO No.190 of 2023
.
18.06.2025 Present: Mr. P.S. Goverdhan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rakesh
Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Manish Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for
respondents No.1 and 2.
Mr. Malay Kaushal, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has filed
an application today in the Registry for placing on record certain
documents, which according to him are relevant for adjudicating
the controversy in issue.
Registry to trace the application so filed and place it on
record well before the next date of hearing, post removal of
objection(s), if any.
List on 11.07.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 18, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Ramtari and others vs. Gauri and others
Civil Revision No.9 of 2023 a/w
.
Civil Revision No.184 of 2022
18.06.2025 Present: Mr. R.K. Bawa, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ajay Sharma,
Advocate, for the petitioner, in both the petitions.
Mr. Divya Raj Singh, Advocate, for the respondents, in
both the petitions.
As jointly payed, list on 09.07.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 18, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Rajesh Kumar vs. Karan Singh and others
RSA No.383 of 2022
.
18.06.2025 Present: Ms. Rinki Kashmiri, Advocate, vice Mr. Janesh Gupta,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Vikas Rathore, Advocate, for respondents No.1, 2 and
3(a) to 3(c).
Mr. Manish Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for
respondent No.4/State.
same.
Record stands received.
Learned counsel for the parties intend to go through the
List for consideration after six weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 18, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Kaushalya and others vs. Med Ram and others
CMPMO No.304 of 2022
.
18.06.2025 Present: Ms. Chehak Khurana, Advocate vice Mr. N.K. Bhalla,
Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. P.S. Goverdhan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rakesh
Thakur, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 3.
As jointly prayed, list on 21.07.2025.
June 18, 2025 (KS) to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Roshan Lal vs. Kisharu Ram
RSA No.285 of 2022
.
18.06.2025 Present: Ms. Anita, Advocate, vice Ms. Anu Tuli, Advocate, for the
appellant.
Mr. G.R. Palsra, Advocate, for respondents No.1(a) to
1(e).
Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant
prays for an adjournment on account of non-availability of the
original counsel. Prayer not opposed.
List after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 18, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Anil Verma vs. Mohinder Walia and another
Civil Revision No.43 of 2021
.
18.06.2025 Present: Mr. Sumit Sood, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Kunal Mehta, Advocate vice Mr. Parmod Singh Thakur,
Advocate, for respondents No.1(a) to 1(d).
Mr. Vishal Singh Thakur, Advocate, for resplendent No.2.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner
submits that the petitioner is ready and willing to hand over the
vacant possession of the premises and pay use and occupation
charges to the petitioner till the handing over of vacant
possession provided some reasonable time for vacating the
premises is granted to the petitioner.
Faced with the aforesaid, learned counsel for the
respondents seek time to have instructions.
List on 01.07.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 18, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Madan Lal vs. State of HP and another
CMPMO No.83 of 2020
.
18.06.2025 Present: Ms. Akanksha, Advocate, vice Mr. S.D. Gill, Advocate, for the
petitioner.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondents/State.
Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner
submits that the original counsel is unavailable today on account
of personal difficulty. She seeks an adjournment. Prayer allowed.
List on 18.08.2025.
Since the interim protection granted vide order dated
17.01.2020 stands automatically vacated, therefore, respondent
is at liberty to get the possession of the premises in question, in
accordance with law.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 18, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Ambika Sharma vs. Rajan Sharma
CMPMO No.150 of 2019
.
18.06.2025 Present: Mr. Vikrant Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Rakesh Kumar Thakur, Advocate, for the respondent.
As jointly prayed, list on 28.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 18, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
M/s Sohmed Care Pvt. Ltd. vs. Lok Raj and another
Civil Suit No.25 of 2022
.
17.06.2025 Present: Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate, vice Mr. Rahul Mahajan,
Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocate, for defendant No.1.
Mr. Vinod Chauhan, Advocate, for defendant No.2.
Mr. Sudhir Thakur, Senior Advocate with Mr. Somesh
Sharma, Advocate, for the proposed defendant-Desh Raj.
Proposed defendant-Ms Reena Kumari is present in person.
OMP No.717 of 2025
Mr. Somesh Sharma, learned counsel has put in appearance
on behalf of the proposed defendant-Desh Raj and seeks time to file
power of attorney and reply on behalf of the said defendant.
Let the needful be done on or before the next date of hearing.
List on 01.07.2025.
Proposed defendant-Ms. Reena Kumari, who is present in
person, submits that she is not in a position to engage a counsel.
In view thereof, Mr. Ishan Sharma, learned Advocate is
appointed as a Legal Aid Counsel to defend her case. Let copies of
the entire proceedings, in the case at hand, be supplied to the Legal
Aid Counsel by the concerned counsels appearing on behalf of the
plaintiff and defendants.
OMP Nos.716 and 718 of 2025
Reply, if any on behalf of the defendants/proposed
defendants be filed on or before the next date of hearing.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 17, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Suresh Kumar vs. Jai Parkash and others
RSA No.65 of 2025
.
17.06.2025 Present: Mr. Nishant Khidtta, Advocate, for the appellant.
RSA No.65 of 2025
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the
respondents, returnable within four weeks. Notice has been
issued on substantial question of law No.3 framed at Page-13 of
the paper book.
CMP No.5861 of 2025
The present application is dismissed as withdrawn with
liberty to file an appropriate application.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 17, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Vikrant Sood vs. Ram Kumari Sood and others
Civil Revision No.86 of 2015
.
17.06.2025 Present: Mr. Anuj Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Deepak Gupta, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 4.
None for respondents No.5 & 6.
Respondent No.7 proceeded against ex parte.
At the request of learned counsel for the petitioner, in
order to enable him to prepare the case, matter is adjourned.
As prayed, list for consideration on 09.07.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 17, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
HPSEB vs. Bhagat Ram (deceased) through LRs. and
others
CMP No.13268 of 2025 a/w CMP Nos.13269 of 2025,
.
13270 and 13271 of 2025 in RFA No.212 of 2012
17.06.2025 Present: Ms. Sunita Sharma, Senior Advocate with Ms. Sugandh
Sharma, Advocate, for the appellants-non-applicants.
Mr. H.S. Rangra, Advocate, for the respondents-
applicants.
Reply/instructions on behalf of the appellants/non-
List after two weeks.
r to
applicants be filed on or before the next date of hearing.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 17, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Indira Devi vs. Surinder Chaudhary
CMP(M) No.332 of 2025
.
17.06.2025 Present: Mr. Naresh Kumar Tomar, Advocate, for the applicant/
appellant.
Ms. Rekha, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
CMP No.4450 of 2025
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is
allowed. The delay in re-filing the appeal, is condoned.
Application stands disposed of.
CMP(M) No.332 of 2025
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicant.
Heard counsel for the parties. Perused the pleadings. For
the sufficient reasons and cause shown in the application, delay
of 11 day in filing the present appeal, is condoned. The
application stands disposed of.
RSA No._____of 2025
It be registered.
As prayed, list for admission after two weeks.
CMP No._______of 2025
It be registered.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 17, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Karam Chand vs. Raftar Thakur and another
CMP(M) No.298 of 2025
.
17.06.2025 Present: Mr. M.A. Safee, Advocate, vice Mr. Shikha Chauhan,
Advocate, for the applicant/ appellant.
Mr. Sankalp Chauhan, Advocate, vice Mr. Sanjay K.
Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
Respondent No.1 though served, but there is no
appearance on his behalf.
Reply and power of attorney, as prayed, be filed on behalf
of respondent No.2 within a period of four weeks. List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 17, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Rajinder Kumar and another vs. Madan Gopal
CMP(M) No.1805 of 2024 in RSA No.311 of 2008
.
17.06.2025 Present: Mr. Pranjal Munjal, Advocate, vice Mr. Janesh Gupta,
Advocate, for the non-applicants/ appellants.
Ms. Kusum Chaudhary, Advocate, for the respondent.
Further time prayed by the parties to place on record the
compromise entered between the parties.
Let the needful be done within four weeks. List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 17, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Bihari Lal (deceased) through LRs. vs. Lachhman and
others
.
CMP(M) No.756 of 2024
17.06.2025 Present: Mr. Umesh Kanwar, Advocate, for the applicants/
appellants.
Mr. V.S. Chauhan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Arsh Chauhan,
Advocate, for respondent No.3.
Rejoinder to the reply(ies) filed on behalf of the
respondents, if any, be filed within four weeks. List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 17, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Meenakshi Kapur vs. Devi Sahiba
CMP(M) No.456 of 2024
.
17.06.2025 Present: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Ms. Kavita Kajal,
Advocate, for the applicant-appellant.
Mr. Hem Chand Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent.
Further time prayed for filing rejoinder.
Let the needful be done within a period of three weeks.
List thereafter.
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
June 17, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
M/s Parari Power Private Limited vs. Additional Chief
Secretary Forest, Govt. of HP
Civil Suit No.16 of 2024
.
17.06.2025 Present: Mr. Balwant Singh Thakur, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
defendant/State.
By way of indulgence, let steps for summoning the
plaintiff’s witness be taken on or before 28.06.2025. Thereafter,
list the matter before Registrar (Judicial) on 03.07.2025 for fixing
a date for recording of plaintiff’s evidence.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 17, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
M/s Deventure Hotel and Resorts Private Limited vs.
UOI and others
Civil Suit No.23 of 2023
.
17.06.2025 Present: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Ms. Kavita Kajal,
Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Senior Panel Counsel, for
defendant No.1.
Ms. Shreya Chauhan, Advocate, for defendants No.2 and
3.
Mr. Pawan K. Sharma, Advocate, for defendant No.4.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
defendants No.5 & 6/State.
Learned counsel for the parties inform that insofar as
access to the suit property is concerned, certain proposal inter se
plaintiff and defendants No.2 and 3 has been exchanged. The
proposal so submitted by the plaintiff is under the active
consideration of defendants No.2 and 3. In view thereof, parties
jointly pray for an adjournment. Prayer allowed.
List on 31.07.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 17, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Arjun Singh vs. Rajindera Kumari and others
RFA No.103 of 2002
.
17.06.2025 Present: Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Senior Advocate with Mr. Diwan Singh
Negi, Advocate, for the appellant.
None for respondents No.1 to 4.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.5/State.
Ms. Devyani Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Shivam
Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.6.
At the joint request of learned counsel for the parties, list
on 28.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 17, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Nand Lal and another vs. Roop Lal and others a/w
connected matters
RSA No.149 of 2022 a/w RSA Nos.150 and 151 of 2022
.
17.06.2025 Present: Mr. H.S. Rangra, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Romesh Verma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sumit
Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.1(a) to 1(c).
Record stands received.
Learned counsel for the parties intend to go through the
same. r
List for consideration after three weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 17, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Wattana (deceased) through LRs. and others vs.
Balwant Ram (deceased) through LRs. and another
CMP(M) No.414 of 2021
.
17.06.2025 Present: Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Suri, Advocate, for the applicants/
appellants.
CMP(M) Nos.1664 & 1665 of 2022
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicants
submits that an appropriate apploication for deletion of name of
proposed legal heir of respondent No.5, i.e. 5(c)-Charan Kaur,
has been filed. However, the same is not on record.
Registry to trace the application so filed and place it on
record well before the next date of hearing, post removal of
objection(s), if any.
List after two weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 17, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Chandermani vs. Bhadar and others
CMPMO No.276 of 2021
.
17.06.2025 Present: Mr. G.R. Palsra, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Sohail Khan, Advocate, for respondents No.2 to 4.
Respondent No.12 is stated to have expired.
Respondents No.1, 5 to 11 and 13 though served, but
there is no appearance on their behalf.
Consequential steps on account of death of respondent
No.12 be taken within four weeks. List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 17, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Vijay Singh and another vs. Kulwant Singh
CMPMO No.253 of 2021
.
17.06.2025 Present: Mr. Romesh Verma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sumit
Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Y.P. Sood and Mr. Parveen Chauhan, Advocates, for
the respondent.
Since the matter has been listed in Court after December,
2021, therefore, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks time to
ascertain the status of his clients.
As prayed, list after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 17, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
The LAC, HPPCL and another vs. Hunar Singh and
others
RFA No.323 of 2019
.
17.06.2025 Present: Mr. Shashi Shirshoo, Central Government Counsel, for
the appellant.
Mr. Kunal Thakur, Advocate, for respondents No.1, 2(a)
and 2(b).
Respondent No.3 is stated to have expired.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.4/State.
CMP(M) Nos.885 & 884 of 2025
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicants as well as legal heirs of deceased respondent No.3.
The non applicants have no objection, if in case the applications
are allowed and the legal heirs of deceased respondent No.3 are
brought on record as is being sought in the application (CMP(M)
No.884 of 2025).
Respondent No.3 is stated to have expired on 06.04.2024.
The same is evident form the Death Certificate appended along-
with the application (CMP(M) No.884 of 2025). The details of the
legal heirs are given in Paragraph-8 of the application (CMP(M)
No.884 of 2025).
The right to sue inheres/survives in the legal heirs of
deceased respondent No.3, detailed in Paragraph-8 of the
application (CMP(M) No.884 of 2025). From perusal of the
application, it is evident that the legal heirs of deceased
respondent No.3 are already on record as respondents No.2(a)
and 2(b).
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
For the bona fide reasons stated/sufficient cause shown in
the application (CMP(M) No.885 of 2025), delay in bringing on
.
record the legal heirs of deceased respondent No.3, is condoned
and abatement, if any, is set aside.
In view of the aforesaid, present applications are allowed.
Name of deceased respondent No.3 is ordered to be deleted from
the array of the respondents, as his legal heirs are already on
record as respondents No.2(a) and 2(b).
The applications stand disposed of. Amended memo of
parties filed at Page-94 of the paper book is ordered to be taken
on record.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 17, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
General Manager Northern Railway vs. Raman Kumar
and others
RFA No.144 of 2017
.
17.06.2025 Present: Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Senior Panel Counsel, for the
appellant.
Mr. Shashwat Dadwal, Advocate, vice Mr. Dushyant
Dadwal, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 13.
Respondent No.14 is stated to have expired.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.15/State.
CMP(M) Nos.893 & 894 of 2025
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the legal
heirs of deceased respondent No.14, details whereof, have been
given in Paragraph-2 of the application (CMP(M) No.893 of
2025), returnable within four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 17, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Ram Lal and others vs. Shanti Devi (deceased)
through LRs. and others
RSA No.4285 of 2013
.
17.06.2025 Present: Mr. Digvijay Singh Bisht, Advocate, vice Mr. B.C. Verma,
Advocate, for all the appellants, except appellant No.19,
who is stated to have expired.
Mr. Pranjal Munjal, Advocate, vice Mr. Janesh Gupta,
Advocate, for respondents No.1(a) to 1(d).
CMP(M) No.818 of 2025
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicants. The non-applicants have no objection, if in case, the
application is allowed and the legal heirs of deceased appellant
No.19, are brought on record as is being sought in the
application.
Appellant No.19 is stated to have expired on 28.02.2025.
The same is evident from the Death Certificate appended along
with the present application. Deceased appellant No.19 is
survived by his legal heirs, details whereof, have been given in
Paragraph-2 of the present application.
Since the right to sue inheres/survives with the legal heirs
of deceased appellant No.19, detailed in Paragraph-2 of the
application, therefore, they are ordered to be brought on record.
The application stands disposed of. Amended memo of
parties be filed within four weeks.
CMP Nos.4252 of 2016 and 6559 of 2018
At the joint request of learned counsel for the parties, list
for consideration after six weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 17, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Khushal Singh and others vs. Premla Devi and others
RSA No.661 of 2012
.
17.06.2025 Present: Mr. Ajay Singh, Senior Advocate with Mr. Tarun Brakta,
Advocate, for appellants No.1 to 4, 5(a) to 5(c), 6 to 18.
None for respondents No.1 to 3.
Power of attorney on behalf of appellants No.1 to 4 and 6
to 18 be filed within a period of eight weeks. List thereafter. In
the meanwhile, amended memo of parties be also filed.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 17, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Harpal Singh (deceased) through LRs. vs. Sachin
RSA No.217 of 2010
.
17.06.2025 Present: Mr. Pranjal Munjal, Advocate, vice Mr. Janesh Gupta,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Divya Raj Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Respondent No.2 is stated to have expired.
CMP(M) No.838 of 2025
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the legal
heirs of deceased respondent No.2, details whereof have been
given in Paragraph-2 of the application, returnable within four
weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 17, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Greenko Astha Projects India Private Limited vs.
M/s Ajeet Singh Tegta Construction Pvt. Ltd. and
others
CMPMO No.317 of 2025
.
17.06.2025 Present: Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vikrant
Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Arvind Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.3/Bank.
CMPMO No.317 of 2025
Notice. Mr. Arvind Sharma, learned counsel, appears and
waives service of notice on behalf of respondent No.3. On taking
steps within three days, issue notice to respondents No.1 and 2,
returnable for 17.07.2025.
List on 17.07.2025.
CMP No. 13359 of 2025
Notice in the aforesaid terms.
The petitioner herein has assailed the impugned order on
the ground that the bank accounts attached in pursuance thereto
belong to the petitioner, which is an entity totally separate from
the judgment-debtor before the learned Executing Court. It is
submitted that the decree in execution before the learned
Executing Court cannot in any event be executed against the
petitioner herein.
The documents placed on record reveal that the impugned
order has been passed only on the basis of the averments made
in the application by the decree holder, without their being
verification, as to the details of the accounts. That being so, till
next date, the operation of order dated 02.05.2025, passed by the
learned District Judge, Shimla in Execution Petition No. 197 of
2020, shall remain stayed. Respondent No.3 is directed to allow
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
the account holder of bank accounts, detailed in the impugned
.
order, to operate the said accounts.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 17, 2025 (KS) Judge
r to
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Greenko Budhil Hydro Private Limited vs. M/s Ajeet
Singh Tegta Construction Pvt. Ltd. and others
CMPMO No.315 of 2025
.
17.06.2025 Present: Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vikrant
Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Arvind Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
CMPMO No.315 of 2025
Notice. Mr. Arvind Sharma, learned counsel, appears and
waives service of notice on behalf of respondent No.3.
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to
respondents No.1 and 2, returnable for 17.07.2025.
List on 17.07.2025.
CMP No. 13389 of 2025
Notice in the aforesaid terms.
The petitioner herein has assailed the impugned order on
the ground that the bank accounts attached in pursuance thereto
belong to the petitioner, which is an entity totally separate from
the judgment-debtor before the learned Executing Court. It is
submitted that the decree in execution before the learned
Executing Court cannot in any event be executed against the
petitioner herein.
The documents placed on record reveal that the impugned
order has been passed only on the basis of the averments made
in the application by the decree holder, without their being
verification, as to the details of the accounts. That being so, till
next date, the operation of order dated 02.05.2025, passed by the
learned District Judge, Shimla in Execution Petition No. 197 of
2020, shall remain stayed. Respondent No.3 is directed to allow
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
the account holder of bank accounts, detailed in the impugned
.
order, to operate the said accounts.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 17, 2025 (KS) Judge
r to
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Greenko Sri Sai Krishna Hydro Energies Private
Limited vs. M/s Ajeet Singh Tegta Construction Pvt.
Ltd. and others
CMPMO No.313 of 2025
.
17.06.2025 Present: Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vikrant
Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Arvind Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.3/Bank.
CMPMO No.313 of 2025
Notice. Mr. Arvind Sharma, learned counsel, appears and
waives service of notice on behalf of respondent No.3. On taking
steps within three days, issue notice to respondents No.1 and 2,
returnable for 17.07.2025.
List on 17.07.2025.
CMP No. 13344 of 2025
Notice in the aforesaid terms.
The petitioner herein has assailed the impugned order on
the ground that the bank accounts attached in pursuance thereto
belong to the petitioner, which is an entity totally separate from
the judgment-debtor before the learned Executing Court. It is
submitted that the decree in execution before the learned
Executing Court cannot in any event be executed against the
petitioner herein.
The documents placed on record reveal that the impugned
order has been passed only on the basis of the averments made
in the application by the decree holder, without their being
verification, as to the details of the accounts. That being so, till
next date, the operation of order dated 02.05.2025, passed by the
learned District Judge, Shimla in Execution Petition No. 197 of
2020, shall remain stayed. Respondent No.3 is directed to allow
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
the account holder of bank accounts, detailed in the impugned
.
order, to operate the said accounts.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 17, 2025 (KS) Judge
r to
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Greenko Sumez Hydro Energies Private Limited vs.
M/s Ajeet Singh Tegta Construction Pvt. Ltd. and
others
CMPMO No.312 of 2025
.
17.06.2025 Present: Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vikrant
Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Arvind Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.3/Bank.
CMPMO No.312 of 2025
Notice. Mr. Arvind Sharma, learned counsel, appears and
waives service of notice on behalf of respondent No.3. On taking
steps within three days, issue notice to respondents No.1 and 2,
returnable for 17.07.2025.
List on 17.07.2025.
CMP No. 13342 of 2025
Notice in the aforesaid terms.
The petitioner herein has assailed the impugned order on
the ground that the bank accounts attached in pursuance thereto
belong to the petitioner, which is an entity totally separate from
the judgment-debtor before the learned Executing Court. It is
submitted that the decree in execution before the learned
Executing Court cannot in any event be executed against the
petitioner herein.
The documents placed on record reveal that the impugned
order has been passed only on the basis of the averments made
in the application by the decree holder, without their being
verification, as to the details of the accounts. That being so, till
next date, the operation of order dated 02.05.2025, passed by the
learned District Judge, Shimla in Execution Petition No. 197 of
2020, shall remain stayed. Respondent No.3 is directed to allow
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
the account holder of bank accounts, detailed in the impugned
.
order, to operate the said accounts.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 17, 2025 (KS) Judge
r to
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Surender Kumar vs. Pankaj Bansal and another
CMPMO No.238 of 2025
.
17.06.2025 Present: Ms. Kanchan Singh, Advocate, vice Mr. Aditya Thakur,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Vipin Pandit, Advocate, for the respondents.
Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner
submits that the original counsel is unavailable today on account
of ill health. She seeks an adjournment. Prayer allowed.
List for consideration after two weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 17, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
M/s Lokpriya Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. vs. Puneet Singh
RSA No.90 of 2025
.
16.06.2025 Present: Mr. P.P. Chauhan, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Rakesh Thakur, Advocate, for the sole respondent.
CMP No.13298 of 2025
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicant.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
For the reasons stated in the application, time to deposit
the decretal amount, along-with up-to-date interest, is extended
by four weeks from today. It is made clear that no further time
shall be granted to the applicant in future.
The application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 16, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Harish Kumar vs. Naresh Kumar
CMPMO No.126 of 2025
.
16.06.2025 Present: Mr. B.S. Chauhan, Senior Advocate with Ms. Aditi Rana,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. G.D. Verma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Digvijay Singh
Bisht, Advocate, for the respondent.
As jointly prayed, list on 28.06.2025.
June 16, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Shivalik Bimetal Controls Limited vs. State of HP
CMPMO No.711 of 2024
.
16.06.2025 Present: Mr. Anirudh Sharma and Mr. Pavinder, Advocates, for the
petitioner.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondent/State.
At the request of learned counsel appearing on behalf of
the petitioner, list on 21.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 16, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Shahina Tabassum vs. Mehboob Aalam and another
CMPMO No.529/2024
.
16.06.2025 Present: Mr. Karan Singh Kanwar, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.L. Soni, Mr. Nitin Soni and Mr. Sunil Gautam,
Advocates, for the respondents.
At the request of learned counsel appearing on behalf of
the petitioner, in order to enable him to prepare the case at hand,
adjournment is granted. List on 28.06.2025.
r ( Bipin C. Negi )
June 16, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Geeta Devi vs. The Commissioner, M.C. Shimla and
others
CMPMO No.347 of 2024
.
16.06.2025 Present: Mr. Rohit Kumar, Advocate, vice Mr. Sumit Sood,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Mukul Sood, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Ashok Kumar Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rajat,
Advocate, for respondents No.2 and 3.
Further time as prayed on behalf of the parties to go
through the report submitted by the Architect Planner in terms of
order dated 06.05.2025 and to file objections qua the same, is
extended till the next date of hearing.
List on 03.07.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 16, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Vijay Kumar Sood vs. Parkasho Devi and others
a/w connected matters
Civil Revision No.185 of 2018 a/w
.
Civil Revision No.216 of 2015, Civil Revision
Nos.58, 74 and 75 of 2016
Civil Revision No.185 of 2018, Civil Revision
No.216 of 2015 and Civil Revision No.58 of 2016
16.06.2025 Present: Mr. Rohit Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. Sumit Sood,
Advocate, for the petitioner(s).
Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 5.
Mr. Ashok Sood, Senior Advocate with Ms. Pooja Verma,
Advocate, for respondents No.6 to 8.
Civil Revision Nos.74 and 75 of 2016
Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner(s).
Mr. Rohit Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. Sumit Sood,
Advocate, for the respondent(s).
List on 04.07.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 16, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Hiuen Dassi and another vs. Kali Dass and others
RSA No.226 of 2024
.
16.06.2025 Present: Mr. Bimal Gupta, Senior Advocate with Ms. Kusum
Chaudhary, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Mohar Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Vishvinder Singh, Advocate, vice Mr. K.B. Khajuria,
Advocate, for respondents No.2 and 3.
Respondent No.4 is proceeded against ex parte vide order
dated 06.12.2024.
There is no possibility of an amicable settlement by way of
mediation.
At the joint request of learned counsel for the parties, list
the matter for hearing at admission stage, after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 16, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Sandeep Bhardwaj vs. Shakuntala
RSA No.167 of 2024
.
16.06.2025 Present: Mr. Parveen Chauhan, Advocate, vice Mr. Y.P. Sood,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ajeet Pal
Singh, Advocate, for the respondent.
At the request of learned vice counsel appearing on behalf
r to
of the appellant, list on 21.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 16, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
H.P. Waqf Board vs. Ashok Rai and others
Civil Revision No.138 of 2024
.
16.06.2025 Present: Mr. R.K. Bawa, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ajay Sharma,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Tek Chand, Advocate, for respondents No.1, 2, 3(a) to
3(c), 4 to 7.
None for respondent No.8(a).
r to
As jointly prayed, list on 17.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 16, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
The Renuka Ji Dam Project and another vs. Magu Ram
and others
.
CMP No.13197 of 2025 in RFA No.373 of 2019
16.06.2025 Present: Mr. Shashi Shirshoo, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.6/State.
Mr. Vaibhav Kanwar, Advocate, for the applicants.
r to
Reply, if any, be filed within two weeks. List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 16, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
HPSEBL vs. Phinu (deceased) through LRs and others
CMP No.13187 of 2025 in RFA No.17 of 2016
.
16.06.2025 Present: Mr. Dhananjay Sharma, Advocate, for the non-applicant-
appellant.
Ms. Anuja Mehta, Advocate, vice Mr. Gurmeet Bhardwaj,
Advocate, for the applicants/respondents.
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicants. The non-applicants have no objection, if in case the
amount lying deposited in this Registry of this Court along-with
proportionate interest accrued thereupon, is released in favour of the
applicants/legal heirs of deceased respondent No.3 who were
brought on record vide order dated 19.05.2025, as is being sought in
the application.
The appeal, in the case at hand, was disposed of by a Co-
ordinate Bench of this Court on 21.10.2022. Learned counsel for the
parties submit that no further proceedings against the said decision
are pending before the Hon’ble Apex Court.
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is
allowed. The amount lying deposited in the Registry of this Court,
along-with proportionate interest accrued thereupon is ordered to be
released in favour of the applicants in terms of their respective
shares, i.e., 1/7th each. The amount be remitted to their bank
account(s), details whereof have been given in Paragraph-5 of the
application, subject to proper verification. The application stands
disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 16, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Jai Pal vs. State of HP
Cr.MP(M) No.1079 of 2025
.
16.06.2025 Present: Mr. Panku Chaudhary, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
Head Constable Rajeev No.323, Women Police Station,
Banjar, Nahan, District Sirmaur, Himachal Pradesh, is present
along-with record.
Status report stands filed. The same is taken on record.
Copy, whereof, has been supplied to learned counsel for the
petitioner, who intends to go through the same.
List for consideration on 30.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 16, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
N.T.P.C. Ltd. vs. Jangi Ram and others
CMP(M) No.891 of 2025
.
16.06.2025 Present: Mr. Virender Thakur, Advocate, for the applicant-appellant.
Mr. Ajeet Pal Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for
respondents No.3 & 4/State.
Respondent No.1 is stated to have expired.
CMP(M) No.891 of 2025
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicants. The non-applicants have no objection, if in case, the
application is allowed and the legal heirs of deceased respondent
No.1, are brought on record as is being sought in the application.
Respondent No.1 is stated to have expired on 21.07.2014.
The same is evident from the Death Certificate appended along
with the present application. From perusal of the Legal Heir
Certificate appended along with the application, it is evident that
based on a Will, the immovable property of the deceased
respondent No.1 has been bequeathed on the legal heirs detailed
in Paragraph-6 of the application.
Since the right to sue inheres/survives with the legal heirs
of deceased respondent No.1, detailed in Paragraph-6 of the
application, therefore, they are ordered to be brought on record.
For the bona fide reasons stated/sufficient cause shown in
the application, delay in bringing on record the legal heirs of
deceased respondent No.1, is condoned and abatement, if any,
is set aside.
The application stands disposed of. Amended memo of
parties filed with the application is taken on record.
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
CMP No.13338 of 2025
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
.
applicants. The non-applicants have no objection, if in case the
amount lying deposited in this Registry of this Court along-with
proportionate interest accrued thereupon, is released in favour of the
applicants, as is being sought in the application.
The appeal, in the case at hand, was disposed of by a Co-
ordinate Bench of this Court on 27.12.2016. Learned counsel for the
parties submit that no further proceedings against the said decision
are pending before the Hon’ble Apex Court.
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is
allowed. The amount lying deposited in the Registry of this Court,
along-with proportionate interest accrued thereupon is ordered to be
released in favour of the applicants in terms of their respective
shares, i.e., 1/4th each. The amount be remitted to their bank
account(s), details whereof have been given in Paragraph-4 of the
application, subject to proper verification. The application stands
disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 16, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Balbir Singh vs. HRTC and another
Execution Petition No.653 of 2025
.
16.06.2025 Present: Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Rahul Thakur, Advocate, for the respondents.
Notice. Mr. Rahul Thakur, learned Advocate, appears and
waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents and seeks
time to file reply.
Reply/instructions on behalf of the respondents be filed on
or before the next date of hearing. List on 17.07.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 16, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Ram Krishan vs. HRTC and another
Execution Petition No.655 of 2025
.
16.06.2025 Present: Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Rahul Thakur, Advocate, for the respondents.
Notice. Mr. Rahul Thakur, learned Advocate, appears and
waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents and seeks
time to file reply.
Reply/instructions on behalf of the respondents be filed on
or before the next date of hearing. List on 17.07.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 16, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Som Nath vs. State of HP and others
Execution Petition No.642 of 2025
.
16.06.2025 Present: Mr. Pawanish K. Shukla, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondents/State.
Notice. Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, learned Additional Advocate
General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the
respondents and seeks time to file reply.
Reply/instructions on behalf of the respondents be filed on
or before the next date of hearing. List after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 16, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
State of Himachal Pradesh and others vs. Ram
Swaroop and others
.
CMP(M) No.558 of 2025
16.06.2025 Present: Mr. Manish Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for the
applicants/State.
Mr. Mohan Singh, Advocate, for respondents No.1, 4, 5
and 7 to 10.
Ms. Shashi Kiran, Advocate, for respondents No.2, 3 & 6.
r to
Power of attorney on behalf of respondents No.1, 4, 5 and
7 to 10, as prayed, be filed within a period of four weeks. List
thereafter.
Reply on behalf of the appearing respondents, if any, be
filed on or before the next date of hearing.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 16, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
M/s Pristine Hotels and Resorts Pvt. Ltd. vs. State of
Himachal Pradesh and another
.
Execution Petition No.270 of 2025
16.06.2025 Present: Mr. Sunil Mohan Goel, Senior Advocate with Mr. Raman
Jamalta, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondents/State.
Learned Additional Advocate General has placed on
record instructions dated 12.06.2025. The same are taken on
record. Copy of the same has been supplied to learned counsel
for the petitioner.
In view of the aforesaid, let the case of the petitioner filed
for grant of permission under Section 118 of the Himachal
Pradesh Tenancy and Land Reforms Act, 1972, in terms of
judgment dated 11.01.2024 be positively decided by the
respondents on or before the next date of hearing.
List on 07.07.2025.
It is made clear that in case the case is not decided on or
before the next date of hearing, Principal Secretary (Revenue) to
the Government of Himachal Pradesh, shall personally remain
present in the Court.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 16, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Tek Chand vs. National Highway Authority of India and
another
.
Arbitration Case No.141 of 2025
16.06.2025 Present: Mr. Jia Lal, Advocate, vice Mr. G. R. Palsra, Advocate, for
the petitioner.
Ms. Shreya Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Manish Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for
respondent No.2/State.
Reply, if any, be filed within four weeks. List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 16, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Bal Krishan (since deceased) through LRs. and others
vs. Kehar Singh and others
CMP(M) No.127 of 2025 in RSA No.173 of 2014
.
16.06.2025 Present: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Ms. Kavita Kajal,
Advocate, for the applicants/appellants.
Mr. Dheeraj K. Vashista, Advocate, for respondents No.3,
4 and 5(a) to 5(c).
Amended memo be filed within two weeks. List thereafter.
June 16, 2025 (KS)
to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Jaya Nand Sharma vs. Basant Lal Rajta
RSA No.281 of 2023 a/w CMP(M) No.1132 of 2024
.
16.06.2025 Present: Mr. Anirudh Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Y.P. Sood, Advocate, for the respondent.
CMP No.6406 of 2025
Reply, if any, be filed by the non-applicants within four
weeks. List thereafter.
r ( Bipin C. Negi )
June 16, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Jaya Nand Sharma vs. Basant Lal Rajta
CMP(M) No.1132 of 2024
.
16.06.2025 Present: Mr. Anirudh Sharma, Advocate, for the applicant/appellant.
Mr. Y.P. Sood, Advocate, for the respondent.
Reply, if any, be filed within four weeks. List thereafter.
June 16, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Collector, Land Acquisition HPPWD and another vs.
Santu
CMP(M) No.771 of 2024
.
16.06.2025 Present: Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
applicants-appellants/State.
Sole respondent is stated to have expired.
Steps for the service of proposed LRs.No.1(a) to 1(d) are
stated to have been taken. Let notice be issued to the said legal
heirs, returnable within four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 16, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Ram Saran vs. National Highway Authority of India and
others
Civil Suit No.56 of 2024
.
16.06.2025 Present: Mr. Pranshul Sharma, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Ms. Shreya Chauhan, Advocate, for defendant No.1.
OMP No.1077 of 2024
Further time prayed to file reply. Let the needful be done
r to
within a week. List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 16, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Saroj Mohan vs. Sanjeev Soni and others
Civil Suit No.4 of 2024
.
16.06.2025 Present: Mr. Ajeet Pal Singh, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Mr. Subhash Chander, Advocate, for defendants No.1 to 4.
Defendant No.8 is unserved.
Mr. Mukul Sood, Advocate, for defendant No.10.
Defendants No.5, 6, 7, and 9 are already ex parte vide
order dated 29.04.2024.
Further time prayed in terms of order dated 04.04.2025.
Let the needful be done on or before the next date of hearing.
List after three weeks.
An application filed under Section 5 Rule 17 of the Civil
Procedure Code for effecting service on defendant No.8 by way
of substituted mode has been dismissed on 11.07.2024.
Therefore, defendant No.8 is still un-served. The factum of
representation of the said defendant No.8 before the Mediator
shall also be considered on the next date of hearing.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 16, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Parma Ram (since deceased) through LRs. vs. Amar
Singh and others
RSA No.36 of 2023
.
16.06.2025 Present: Mr. Tek Chand, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Ashok Kumar Verma, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
None for respondents No.4(a), 4(d), 22, 25 and 59.
Respondents No.8, 10, 17, 18, 36, 39, 44(c) and 66 are
stated to have expired.
CMP No.13293 of 2025
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of respondent
No.1. Proforma respondent No.17 had been proceeded against
ex parte both by the Trial Court and the First Appellate Court. No
written statement has been filed on behalf of proforma
respondent No.17. In view thereof, in terms of provisions of
Order 22 Rule 4 (4) of the Civil Procedure Code, the present
applicants-appellants are exempted from bringing on record the
legal heirs of deceased proforma respondent No.17. The
application stands disposed of.
RSA No.36 of 2023
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants
submits that appropriate applications for deletion of names of
respondents No.32, 37, 44(b), 47, 49 and 50 have been filed in
the Registry today itself.
If in order, let the same be taken on record. List the matter
after two weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 16, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Gian Chand and another vs. Bisso (deceased) through
LRs. and others
CMP(M) No.1371 of 2022
.
16.06.2025 Present: Mr. Digvijay Singh, Advocate, for the applicants.
None for respondents No.1(i) to 1(vi).
Mr. J.P. Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.2(i) to 2(v).
CMP No.8292 of 2025
Further time prayed for filing reply.
done within three weeks. List thereafter.
r Let the needful be
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 16, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Kamlesh Kumar and others vs. Trilok Chand and
others
RSA No.360 of 2022
.
16.06.2025 Present: Mr. Pawanish K. Shukla, Advocate, for the appellants.
Ms. Pooja Bhushari, Advocate, vice Mr. Ram Gopal
Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Vijay Singh Bhatia, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
None for respondents No.3 to 6 and 8(i) & 8(ii).
Respondent No.7 ex parte vide order dated 31.07.2024.
An application for correction of the record is pending
adjudication before the 1st Appellate Court in terms of order dated
29.08.2024.
As jointly prayed, list the matter after eight weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 16, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
HP State Agriculture Marketing Board and another vs.
Arun Kumar Thakur
.
Arbitration Case Nos.50 and 51 of 2016
06.06.2025 Present: Ms. Kamlesh Kumari, Advocate, vice Mr. H.S. Rana,
Advocate, for the petitioner(s), in both the petitions.
Mr. Suneet Goel, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vivek Negi,
Advocate, for the respondent(s), in both the petitions.
In terms of Sections 2(i)(c)(vi) of the Commercial Courts
Act, 2015, the dispute in the case at hand pertains to a
commercial dispute. Therefore, in view of Sections 6 and 10(2) of
the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, list the matter before the
Commercial Division Bench.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Rameshwaru Devi vs. Ganga Ram
RSA No.49 of 2025
.
06.06.2025 Present: Mr. Ajay Kumar Dhiman, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Mohit Thakur, Advocate, for the respondent.
RSA No.49 of 2025
Mr. Mohit Thakur, learned counsel has filed memo of
appearance on behalf of the appellants. He seeks time to file power
of attorney.
Let the needful be done within four weeks. List thereafter.
CMP No.4533 of 2025
Reply, if any, on or before the next date of hearing.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Mohinder Singh vs. Bagga Singh and others
CMPMO No.763 of 2024
.
06.06.2025 Present: Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocate, vice Mr. Sunny Modgill,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
At the request of learned vice counsel appearing on behalf
of the petitioner, list after four weeks. It is made clear that mere
pendency of this petition shall not preclude the trial Court to
proceed further in the matter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Principal Secretary Revenue and others vs. Prakash
and others
RSA No.253 of 2024
.
06.06.2025 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
appellants/State.
Mr. Malay Kaushal, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 4.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties submit
that similar matter listed before the Apex Court is coming up for
hearing on 25.07.2025.
In view thereof, list the matter in the third week of
August, 2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Joni and another vs. Anokhi Ram and another
CMPMO No.156 of 2024
.
06.06.2025 Present: Mr. Rakesh Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. H.R. Jhingta,
Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Dinesh Kumar Sharma, Advocate, for respondent
No.1.
None for respondent No.2.
Record stands received.
Learned counsel for the parties intend to go through the
same.
List for consideration on 30.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Joni and another vs. Anokhi Ram and another
CMPMO No.156 of 2024
.
06.06.2025 Present: Mr. Rakesh Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. H.R. Jhingta,
Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Dinesh Kumar Sharma, Advocate, for respondent
No.1.
None for respondent No.2.
same.
Record stands received.
Learned counsel for the parties intend to go through the
List for consideration on 30.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Gurbachan Lal and others vs. LAC and another a/w
connected matters
Civil Revision No.46 of 2024 a/w Civil Revision Nos.35
.
& 36 of 2024
06.06.2025 Present: Mr. Atharv Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner(s), in all
the petitions.
Mr. Rajinder Thakur, Central Government Counsel, for the
respondents/Union of India.
As jointly prayed, list after eight weeks.
r ( Bipin C. Negi )
June 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
State of HP and others vs. Mahantu Ram and others
a/w connected matters
RSA No.18 of 2024 a/w RSA No.28, 30, 36, 62, 67, 71 &
.
72 of 2025
06.06.2025 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
appellants/State, in all the appeals.
Mr. Abhishek Thakur & Mr. Rohal Thakur, Advocates, vice
Mr. Maan Singh and Mr. Vivek Chandel, Advocates, for
respective respondents.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties submit
that similar matter listed before the Apex Court is coming up for
hearing on 25.07.2025.
In view thereof, list the matter in the third week of
August, 2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Mamta Sharma vs. Akshay Sharma
CMPMO No.690 of 2023
.
06.06.2025 Present: Mr. Akshay Katoch, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Ashish Verma, Advocate, for the respondent.
At the request of learned counsel appearing on behalf of
the petitioner, matter is adjourned.
List on 21.06.2025.
June 06, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Rup Lal vs. Dillan Devi and others
RSA No.113 of 2023
.
06.06.2025 Present: Ms. Shwetima Dogra, Advocate, vice Mr. Vinod Kumar
Gupta, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. K.D. Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Het Ram Thakur,
Advocate, for the respondents.
At the request of learned vice counsel appearing on behalf
of the appellant, matter is adjourned.
List on 10.07.2025.
June 06, 2025 (KS)
to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Jagdish Kumar vs. Sub Divisional Officer and others
CMPMO No.581 of 2022
.
06.06.2025 Present: Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.1/State.
Ms. Shreya Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
Ms. Shruti Dubey, Advocate, vice Mr. B.S. Thakur,
Advocate, for respondent No.3.
At the request of learned vice counsel appearing on behalf
of respondent No.3, matter is adjourned.
List on 25.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Rajeev Sharma vs. Ram Devi and others
CR No.13 of 2021
.
06.06.2025 Present: Mr. Ashish Verma, Advocate, vice Mr. B.S. Attri, Advocate,
for the petitioner.
None for respondents No.1, 2(a) to 2(c), 4 & 5.
Respondent No.3 proceeded against ex parte vide order
dated 12.08.2021.
Ms. Tanu Sharma, Advocate, as Court Guardian, for
respondents No.6 & 7.
r to
In pursuance to previous order, learned counsel appearing
on behalf of the respondent/landlord submits that no locks have
been put on the gate, thereby denying access to the petitioner/
tenant to the tenanted premises in the case at hand. He further
submits that no scrap has also been kept in the toilet.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner/
tenant vehemently opposes the same and submits that he shall
be placing on record the photographs demonstrating the locks put
on the gate, whereby access has been denied to him and also
photographs of the toilet depicting the scrap thereby making the
same unfit for use.
List on 10.07.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Shekhar Indu and another vs. Kishori Lal (deceased)
through LRs.
CMPMO No.298 of 2019
.
06.06.2025 Present: Mr. Parikshit Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Pranjal Munjal, Advocate, vice Mr. Ajeet Pal Singh
Jaswal, Advocate, for respondents No.1(iv) to 1(vi).
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that an
appropriate application for bringing on record the legal heir of
deceased respondent No.1(iv) has been filed. However, the same
is not on record.
Registry to trace the application so filed and place it on
record well before the next date of hearing, post removal of
objection(s), if any.
List after two weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Jaskaranpreet Singh vs. State of HP and another
Cr.MP(M) No.1310 of 2025
.
06.06.2025 Present: Mr. Sunny Rawat, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. R.P. Singh, Deputy Advocate General, for the
respondents/State.
Notice. Mr. R.P. Singh, learned Deputy Advocate General,
appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondent-
State. He prays for and is granted four week’s time to file status
report.
List on 02.07.2025.
Heard. In the interim, it is ordered that in the event of arrest
of the petitioner in connection with FIR No.96/2024 dated
28.08.2024, under Sections 310(2), 310(5), 126(2), 351(3) & 238 of
BNS, registered at Police Station, Haroli, District Una, H.P., he shall
be released on bail, subject to his furnishing personal bond to the
tune of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand), with one surety
in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer,
subject to the following conditions:-
“1. That the petitioner will join investigation of case as
and when called for by the Investigating Officer, in
accordance with law.
2. That he shall not directly or indirectly make any
inducement, threat or promise to any person
acquainted with the facts of the case so as to
dissuade them/him/her from disclosing such facts to
the Investigating Officer or Court.
3. That he shall not tamper with the prosecution
evidence nor he will try to win over the prosecution
witnesses in any manner.
4. That he shall not leave India without prior permission
of the Court.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Jaskaranpreet Singh vs. State of HP and another
Cr.MP(M) No.1309 of 2025
.
06.06.2025 Present: Mr. Sunny Rawat, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. R.P. Singh, Deputy Advocate General, for the
respondents/State.
Notice. Mr. R.P. Singh, learned Deputy Advocate General,
appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondent-
State. He prays for and is granted four week’s time to file status
report.
List on 02.07.2025.
Heard. In the interim, it is ordered that i10n the event of
arrest of the petitioner in connection with FIR No.251 of 2024 dated
26.08.2024, under Sections 304, 62, 115(2) & 3(5) of BNS,
registered at Police Station, Una Sadar, District Una, H.P., he shall
be released on bail, subject to his furnishing personal bond to the
tune of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand), with one surety
in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer,
subject to the following conditions:-
“1. That the petitioner will join investigation of case as
and when called for by the Investigating Officer, in
accordance with law.
2. That he shall not directly or indirectly make any
inducement, threat or promise to any person
acquainted with the facts of the case so as to
dissuade them/him/her from disclosing such facts to
the Investigating Officer or Court.
3. That he shall not tamper with the prosecution
evidence nor he will try to win over the prosecution
witnesses in any manner.
4. That he shall not leave India without prior permission
of the Court.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
M/s Naziveedu Seeds Limited vs. Jai Singh (deceased )
thorough LRs. and othersCMP No.12826 of 2025 in RFA No.353
.
of 2017
06.06.2025 Present: None for the non-applicant/ appellant.
Mr. Ashwani Negi, Advocate, for the applicant/respondent
No.1.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondents/State.
CMP No.12826 of 2025
On taking steps within a week, issue notice to the non-
applicants/appellants, returnable within four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
NPTC Limited Kol Dam vs. Bangali Ram (deceased)
through LRs., namely Shyam Lal and othersRFA No.13 of 2014
.
06.06.2025 Present: Mr. K.B. Khajuria, Advocate, for the appellant.
Ms. Rajni Gandhi, Advocate, vice Mr. Rajiv Rai, Advocate,
for respondents No.1(a) to 1(m) and 2 to 7.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for
respondents No.8 & 9/State.
CMP No.12818 of 2025
r to
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicants. The non-applicants have no objection, if in case the
amount lying deposited in this Registry of this Court along-with
proportionate interest accrued thereupon, is released in favour of the
applicants, as is being sought in the application.
The appeal, in the case at hand, was disposed of by a Co-
ordinate Bench of this Court on 21.11.2022. Learned counsel for the
parties submit that no further proceedings against the said decision
are pending before the Hon’ble Apex Court.
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is
allowed. The amount lying deposited in the Registry of this Court
along-with proportionate interest accrued thereupon is ordered to be
released in favour of the applicants in terms of their shares. The
amount be remitted to the bank accounts, details whereof, have
been given in Paragraph-3 of the application, subject to proper
verification. The application stands disposed of.
CMP Nos.12819 & 12820 of 2025
Allowed and the applicants are exempted from filing
translated copies of the documents, in question, annexed with the
accompanying applications, at this stage, subject to filing of the
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
same within seven days, as and when directed to do so. Theapplications stand disposed of.
.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
r to
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
M.C. Shimla vs. Mahesh Sood (deceased) through LRs.
RSA No.106 of 2009
.
06.06.2025 Present: Mr. Mukul Sood, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Rohit Advocate, vice Mr. Sumit Sood, Advocate, for
respondents No.1(a) and 1(b).
CMP No.12612 of 2025
For the reasons stated in the application, early hearing of
RSA No.106 of 2009
r to
the appeal is allowed. The application stands disposed of.
List for hearing in the 4th week of July, 2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Kehar Singh (deceased) thorough LRs. vs. Ramesh
Chand and another.
RSA No.443 of 2014
06.06.2025 Present: Mr. M.L. Sharma, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Pranjal Munjal, Advocate, vice Mr. Ajeet Pal Singh
Jaswal, Advocate, for the respondents.
CMP No.12480 of 2025
For the reasons stated in the application, early hearing of
the appeal is allowed. The application stands disposed of.
RSA No.443 of 2014
List for hearing in the 1st week of August, 2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Suresh Kumar vs. State of HP
Cr.MP(M) No.1006 of 2025
.
06.06.2025 Present: Mr. Vikrant Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. R.P. Singh, Deputy Advocate General, for the
respondents/State.
ASI Chaman Lal, Police Station, Banjar, District Kullu,
Himachal Pradesh, is present along-with record.
Status report stands filed. The same is taken on record.
Copy, whereof, has been supplied to learned counsel for the
petitioner, who intends to go through the same.
List for consideration on 28.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Puneet Kumar vs. Narinder Kumar and another
CMP(M) No.855 of 2025
.
06.06.2025 Present: Mr. Naveen K. Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the
applicant/appellant.
On taking steps within a week, issue notice to the
respondents returnable within four weeks.
June 06, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:33 :::CIS
Mahender Singh vs. HRTC and another
Execution Petition No.667 of 2025
.
06.06.2025 Present: Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Rahul Thakur, Advocate, for the respondents.
Notice. Mr. Rahul Thakur, learned counsel, appears and
waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents and seeks
time to file reply.
Reply/instructions on behalf of the respondents be filed on
or before the next date of hearing. List on 17.07.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Rakesh Kumar vs. HRTC and another
Execution Petition No.665 of 2025
.
06.06.2025 Present: Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Rahul Thakur, Advocate, for the respondents.
Notice. Mr. Rahul Thakur, learned counsel, appears and
waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents and seeks
time to file reply.
Reply/instructions on behalf of the respondents be filed on
or before the next date of hearing. List on 17.07.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Raveesh Ninta and another vs. State of HP and
anotherExecution Petition No.587 of 2025
.
06.06.2025 Present: Mr. Yogesh Kumar Chandel, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. R.P. Singh, Deputy Advocate General, for the
respondents/State.
Notice. Mr. R.P. Singh, learned Deputy Advocate General,
appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the
respondents and seeks time to file reply.
Reply/instructions on behalf of the respondents be filed on
or before the next date of hearing. List on 09.07.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Des Raj vs. The Himachal Pradesh Toursim
Development Corporation Ltd.
Execution Petition No.213 of 2025
.
06.06.2025 Present: Mr. O.P. Goel, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Shivank Singh Panta, Advocate, for the respondent.
Notice. Mr. Shivank Singh Panta, Advocate, appears and
waives service of notice on behalf of the respondent and seeks
time to file reply.
Reply/instructions on behalf of the respondents be filed on
or before the next date of hearing. List on 09.07.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Yugal Kishore vs. Jiwan Lal
CMP(M) No.2133 of 2024
.
06.06.2025 Present: Mr. Pranjal Munjal, Advocate, vice Mr. Ajeet Pal Singh
Jaswal, Advocate, for the applicant-appellant.
Mr. Parav Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent,
on instructions, submits that mediation in the case at hand is not
possible.
In view thereof, list the matter for consideration after four
weeks. Pleadings be completed in the meanwhile.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Lundermani (deceased) & others vs. Dharam Chand
and othersCMP(M) No.2083 of 2024
.
06.06.2025 Present: Mr. G.R. Palsra, Advocate, for the applicants.
Mr. Digvijay Singh, Advocate for the non-applicants.
Further time prayed to file rejoinder. Let the needful be
done within three weeks. List thereafter.
June 06, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Shiv Dayal and another vs. Kanshi Ram and others
CMP(M) No.1867/2024 a/w CMP(M) No.2115/2024 in
.
RSA No.105 of 2012
06.06.2025 Present: Mr. R.K. Bawa, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vijay Chaudhary,
Advocate, for the applicants.
Mr. Harshit Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Janesh Gupta,
Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 5.
CMP(M) No.2115 of 2024
is not on record.
r to
Rejoinder is stated to have been filed. However, the sameRegistry to trace the rejoinder so filed and place it on
record well before the next date of hearing, post removal of
objection(s), if any.
List on 07.07.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Rangil Ram vs. State of HP
Cr.MP No.1454 of 2024 in Cr.MP(M) No.141 of 2024
.
06.06.2025 Present: Mr. Devender K. Sharma, Advocate, for the non-applicant/
petitioner.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
Ms. Chetna Thapar, Advocate, vice Ms. Chetna Thakur,
Advocate, for the complainant.
Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of the
applicant/complainant prays for an adjournment on account of
non-availability of the original counsel. Prayer not opposed.
List after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
LAC, HPPWD Mandi and others vs. Duni Chand and
othersRFA No.45 of 2024
.
06.06.2025 Present: Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
appellants/State.
Mr. G.R. Palsra, Advocate, for the respondents.
CMP No.12958 of 2025
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is
allowed. The applicants-appellants are permitted to deposit the
awarded amount within a period of two weeks from today. The
application stands disposed of.
RFA No.45 of 2024
List after two weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Union of India vs. Bantu Devi and another
CMP(M) No.1228 of 2023 & CMP No.13056 of 2023 in
RFA No.311 of 2007.
06.06.2025 Present: Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Senior Panel Counsel, for the
applicant/Union of India.
Mr. Devender K. Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Maan Singh,
Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.2/State.
At the request of learned vice counsel appearing on behalf
of respondent No.1, list the matter after two weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Om Parkash vs. HRTC and another
Execution Petition No.558 of 2025
.
06.06.2025 Present: Ms. Anchal Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Balwant Singh
Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate, for the respondents.
Notice. Mr. Raman Jamalta, learned Advocate, appears
and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents and
seeks time to file reply.
Reply/instructions on behalf of the respondents be filed on
or before the next date of hearing. List on 17.07.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Amar Singh vs. HRTC and another
Execution Petition No.518 of 2025
.
06.06.2025 Present: Ms. Anchal Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Balwant Singh
Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate, for the respondents.
Notice. Mr. Raman Jamalta, learned Advocate, appears
and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents and
seeks time to file reply.
Reply/instructions on behalf of the respondents be filed on
or before the next date of hearing. List on 17.07.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Amar Singh vs. HRTC and another
Execution Petition No.555 of 2025
.
06.06.2025 Present: Ms. Anchal Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Balwant Singh
Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate, for the respondents.
Notice. Mr. Raman Jamalta, learned Advocate, appears
and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents and
seeks time to file reply.
Reply/instructions on behalf of the respondents be filed on
or before the next date of hearing. List on 17.07.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Sunil Kumar vs. HRTC and another
Execution Petition No.546 of 2025
.
06.06.2025 Present: Ms. Anchal Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Balwant Singh
Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate, for the respondents.
Notice. Mr. Raman Jamalta, learned Advocate, appears
and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents and
seeks time to file reply.
Reply/instructions on behalf of the respondents be filed on
or before the next date of hearing. List on 17.07.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Joginder Singh vs. HRTC and another
Execution Petition No.530 of 2025
.
06.06.2025 Present: Ms. Anchal Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Balwant Singh
Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate, for the respondents.
Notice. Mr. Raman Jamalta, learned Advocate, appears
and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents and
seeks time to file reply.
Reply/instructions on behalf of the respondents be filed on
or before the next date of hearing. List on 17.07.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Sunil Kumar vs. HRTC and another
Execution Petition No.526 of 2025
.
06.06.2025 Present: Ms. Anchal Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Balwant Singh
Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate, for the respondents.
Notice. Mr. Raman Jamalta, learned Advocate, appears
and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents and
seeks time to file reply.
Reply/instructions on behalf of the respondents be filed on
or before the next date of hearing. List on 17.07.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Roshan Lal vs. HRTC and another
Execution Petition No.527 of 2025
.
06.06.2025 Present: Ms. Anchal Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Balwant Singh
Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate, for the respondents.
Notice. Mr. Raman Jamalta, learned Advocate, appears
and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents and
seeks time to file reply.
Reply/instructions on behalf of the respondents be filed on
or before the next date of hearing. List on 17.07.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Bhuree Lal vs. HRTC and another
Execution Petition No.525 of 2025
.
06.06.2025 Present: Ms. Anchal Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Balwant Singh
Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate, for the respondents.
Notice. Mr. Raman Jamalta, learned Advocate, appears
and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents and
seeks time to file reply.
Reply/instructions on behalf of the respondents be filed on
or before the next date of hearing. List on 17.07.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Suraj Parkesh vs. HRTC and another
Execution Petition No.524 of 2025
.
06.06.2025 Present: Ms. Anchal Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Balwant Singh
Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate, for the respondents.
Notice. Mr. Raman Jamalta, learned Advocate, appears
and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents and
seeks time to file reply.
Reply/instructions on behalf of the respondents be filed on
or before the next date of hearing. List on 17.07.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Sandeep Kumar vs. HRTC and another
Execution Petition No.522 of 2025
.
06.06.2025 Present: Ms. Anchal Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Balwant Singh
Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate, for the respondents.
Notice. Mr. Raman Jamalta, learned Advocate, appears
and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents and
seeks time to file reply.
Reply/instructions on behalf of the respondents be filed on
or before the next date of hearing. List on 17.07.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Raj Kumar vs. HRTC and another
Execution Petition No.520 of 2025
.
06.06.2025 Present: Ms. Anchal Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Balwant Singh
Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate, for the respondents.
Notice. Mr. Raman Jamalta, learned Advocate, appears
and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents and
seeks time to file reply.
Reply/instructions on behalf of the respondents be filed on
or before the next date of hearing. List on 17.07.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Gian Chand vs. HRTC and another
Execution Petition No.519 of 2025
.
06.06.2025 Present: Ms. Anchal Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Balwant Singh
Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate, for the respondents.
Notice. Mr. Raman Jamalta, learned Advocate, appears
and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents and
seeks time to file reply.
Reply/instructions on behalf of the respondents be filed on
or before the next date of hearing. List on 17.07.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Amar Singh vs. HRTC and another
Execution Petition No.508 of 2025
.
06.06.2025 Present: Ms. Anchal Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Balwant Singh
Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate, for the respondents.
Notice. Mr. Raman Jamalta, learned Advocate, appears
and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents and
seeks time to file reply.
Reply/instructions on behalf of the respondents be filed on
or before the next date of hearing. List on 17.07.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Devender Kumar vs. HRTC and another
Execution Petition No.507 of 2025
.
06.06.2025 Present: Ms. Anchal Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Balwant Singh
Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate, for the respondents.
Notice. Mr. Raman Jamalta, learned Advocate, appears
and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents and
seeks time to file reply.
Reply/instructions on behalf of the respondents be filed on
or before the next date of hearing. List on 17.07.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Mast Ram vs. HRTC and another
Execution Petition No.501 of 2025
.
06.06.2025 Present: Ms. Anchal Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Balwant Singh
Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate, for the respondents.
Notice. Mr. Raman Jamalta, learned Advocate, appears
and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents and
seeks time to file reply.
Reply/instructions on behalf of the respondents be filed on
or before the next date of hearing. List on 17.07.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Vijay Ram Sharma (deceased) through LRs. vs. Anil
Kumar Sharma and othersCMP(M) No.1202 of 2024 in CMP(M) No.1420 of 2022
.
05.06.2025 Present: None for the applicants/appellants.
Applicants/appellants No.1(a) is stated to have expired.
Mr. Shivam Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 3.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents No.1
to 3 submits that appellant No.1(a) has died.
Let consequential steps for bringing on record the legal
heirs of deceased appellant No.1(a) be taken within four weeks.
List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 05, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Duni Chand vs. Tara Chand
RSA No.177 of 2024
.
05.06.2025 Present: Mr. Aditya Kaushal, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Vijay Chaudhary, Advocate, for the respondent.
CMP No.11186 & 11188 of 2024
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant
submits that rejoinder stands filed. However, the same is not on
record. r
Registry to trace the rejoinder so filed and place it onrecord well before the next date of hearing, post removal of
objection(s), if any.
List after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 05, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Prince vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Cr.MP(M) No.749 of 2025
.
05.06.2025 Present: Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Suri, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondent/State.
HC Ashwani Kumar No.20, Women Police Station, Una,
District Una, Himachal Pradesh, is present along-with record.
28.06.2025.
r to
At the request of learned counsel for the petitioner, list on( Bipin C. Negi )
June 05, 2025 (KS) Judge::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Raghav Kuthiala and another vs. Sarita Bhateja and
othersCivil Suit No.32 of 2024
.
05.06.2025 Present: Mr. Ashok Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rajat,
Advocate, for the plaintiffs.
Ms. Meera Devi, Advocate, vice Mr. Deepak Gupta,
Advocate, for defendant No.1.
Mr. Dibender Ghosh, Advocate, for respondents No.2 to 6.
completed.
r to
OMP No.393 of 2024 and OMP Nos.28 & 37 of 2025List on 03.07.2025. In the meanwhile, pleadings be
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 05, 2025 (KS) Judge::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Union of India vs. Ses Ram and anotherCMP(M) No.1230 of 2023 in CMP No.13060 of 2023
.
05.06.2025 Present: Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Senior Panel Counsel, for the
applicant/appellant.
Respondent No.1 is stated to have expired.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.2/State.
Learned Senior Panel Counsel, for the applicant submits
that he intends to place on record judgment passed by the Apex
Court in certain other connected matters which were taken up till
the Apex Court.
As prayed, list after four weeks. In the meanwhile,
amended memo of parties be also filed.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 05, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Mohammad Mustafa vs. Akbar Ali and others
CMP(M) No.1539 of 2023
.
05.06.2025 Present: Ms. Kusum Chaudhary, Advocate, for the
applicant/appellant.
Mr. Umesh Kanwar, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 5,
7, 9, 21, 23 to 25.
CMP(M) No.1539 of 2023
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicants.
Heard counsel for the parties. Perused the pleadings. For
the sufficient reasons and cause shown in the application, delay
of 15 day in filing the present appeal, is condoned. The
application stands disposed of.
RSA No._____of 2025
It be registered.
As prayed, list for admission after four weeks.
CMP No.______of 2025
It be registered.
Reply, if any, be filed on or before the next date of hearing.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 05, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Harbhaj vs. Duni Chand and others
CMP(M) No.1064 of 2023
.
05.06.2025 Present: Mr. Ruchirangad Singh, Advocate, vice Mr. Rakesh Kumar
Sharma, Advocate, for the applicant/appellant.
Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate, vice Mr. Ajay Chandel,
Advocate, for respondents No.1 and 2.
None for respondents No.6 to 9.
CMP(M) No.1064 of 2023
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicants. r
Heard counsel for the parties. Perused the pleadings. Forthe sufficient reasons and cause shown in the application, delay
of 01 day in filing the present appeal, is condoned. The
application stands disposed of.
RSA No._____of 2025
It be registered.
As prayed, list for admission after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 05, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Madhu Bala vs. Kumari Megha and another
CMPMO No.342 of 2023
.
05.06.2025 Present: Mr. Karan Singh Kanwar, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Kanwar Bhupinder Singh, Advocate, for the respondents.
Further time prayed to comply with order dated
05.05.2025.
Let the needful be done on or before the next date of
r to
hearing. List on 25.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 05, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Inder Singh vs. HRTC and others
RFA No.33 of 2023
.
05.06.2025 Present: Mr. Rohit, Advocate, vice Mr. Davinder Chauhan Jaita,
Advocate, for the appellant/applicant in CMP No.4798 of
2025.
Mr. Ajay Kumar Chauhan, Advocate, for respondents No.1
and 2.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.3/State.
CMP No.4798 of 2025
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicants. The non-applicants have no objection if in case, 50%
of the amount lying deposited in this Registry of this Court along-
with proportionate interest accrued thereupon, is released in
favour of the applicant, as is being sought in the application.
In furtherance of order dated 20.05.2025, the Registry of
this Court, on inquiry from the Land Acquisition Collector-cum-
Sub Divisional Magistrate, Rohru, District Shimla, Himachal
Pradesh, has ascertained that an amount of Rs.71,88,328/-,
which stands deposited in RFA No.74 of 2020, includes an
amount of Rs.13,06,638/-, which was awarded in Land Reference
No.5-R/4 of 2015/14, out of which, RFA No.33 of 2023 (present
appeal) has arisen.
In view of the aforesaid and for the reasons stated in the
present application, 50% of the compensation amount awarded in
Land Reference No.5-R/4 of 2015/14, deposited in RFA No.74 of
2020, along-with proportionate interest accrued thereupon, is
released in favour of the applicant. The amount be remitted in
the bank account of the applicant, details whereof, have been
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
given in Paragraph-7 of the application, subject to proper.
verification. The application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 05, 2025 (KS) Judge
r to
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Punit Kumar vs. Sanjay Kaushal and others a/w
connected matterRSA No.62 of 2014 a/w RSA No.4240 of 2023
.
05.06.2025 Present: Mr. Anubhav Chopra, Advocate, for the appellants, in both
the appeals.
Mr. Navlesh Verma, Advocate, for respondent No.1, in RSA
No.62 of 2014.
Mr. Rohit, Advocate, vice Mr. Sumit Sood, Advocate, for LRs.
No.2(a) to 2(c), in RSA No.62 of 2014 and for LRs. No.1(a) to
1(c) in RSA No.4240 of 2023.
Mr. Anubhav Chopra, learned counsel has filed memo of
appearance on behalf of the appellants. He seeks time to file power
of attorney.
Let the needful be done within four weeks. List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 05, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Kuldeep Singh and others vs. Harbans Lal (since
deceased) through LRs. and othersRSA No.4158 of 2013
.
05.06.2025 Present: Mr. Rohit, Advocate, vice Mr. Sumit Sood, Advocate, for all
the appellants, except appellant No.2, who is stated to have
expired and for the applicants in CMP No.12399 of 2025.
Mr. V.S. Rathour, Advocate, for respondents No.1(a) to 1(e).
None for proposed LRs. No.2(a) to 2(f).
CMP No.12399 of 2025
Vide order dated 06.11.2024, passed in CMP(M) No.701 of
2023, LRs. of appellant No.2 had been ordered to be brought on
record. However, from perusal of the application (CMP(M) No.701
of 2023), specifically Paragraph-3 thereof, it is evident that the legal
heirs of appellant No.2 had shown their reluctance and unwillingness
to join as legal heirs of deceased appellant No.2. Therefore, in the
said application, it had been prayed that the legal heirs of appellant
No.2 be transposed as proforma respondents.
In view of the aforesaid, legal heirs of deceased appellant
No.2 are permitted to be arrayed as proforma respondents.
Let amended memo of parties be filed within one week from
today. Application stands disposed of.
RSA No.4158 of 2013
On taking steps within a week, issue notice to the newly
added proforma respondents, returnable within four weeks. List
thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 05, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Roshan Lal (since deceased) through LRs. vs. Birbal
and othersRSA No.337 of 2012
.
05.06.2025 Present: Ms. Gayatri, Advocate, vice Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate,
for the appellants.
Mr. Surya Chauhan, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 11.
Further time prayed to file fresh power of attorney on
behalf of respondents No.2 to 11.
Let the needful be done within four weeks. List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 05, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Shiv Charan Singh (since deceased) through LRs. and
others vs. State of HP and othersCMPMO No.295 of 2025
.
05.06.2025 Present: Mr. Rajinder Kumar Sharma and Mr. Jai Ram Sharma,
Advocates, for the petitioners.
At the request of learned counsel appearing on behalf of
the petitioners, list on 18.06.2025.
June 05, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Anita Gandotra and another vs. Rajrani Puri and
othersRSA No.113 of 2025
.
05.06.2025 Present: Mr. N.K. Thakur, Senior Advocate with Mr. Divya Raj
Singh, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Vivek Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.5.
At the request of learned counsel appearing on behalf of
the appellants, list on 19.06.2025.
r ( Bipin C. Negi )
June 05, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Suresh Kumar vs. Ramesh Chand and others
CMPMO No.277 of 2025
.
05.06.2025 Present: Mr. Mukesh Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Rajiv Rai,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner
submits that in pursuance to the compromise entered into inter
the parties, on 23.01.2019, petitioner is ready and willing to
remove the blockage from the path in question.
Let an affidavit in this regard, after removal of the
blockage, be filed by the petitioner.
List on 16.06.2025. No notices, at this stage, are issued to
the respondents.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 05, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Asa Nand & Sons and others vs. Arvind Kumar Sood
a/w connected mattersCivil Revision No.52 of 2018 a/w Civil Revision No.63,
.
120 and 137 of 2018
04.06.2025 Present: Mr. Bimal Gupta, Senior Advocate with Ms. Kusum
Chaudhary, Advocate, for the petitioners in CR Nos.52 &63 of 2018 and for the respondents in CR Nos.120 and
137 of 2018.
Mr. Vipin Pandit, Advocate, for the respondents in CR
Nos.52 & 63 of 2018 and for the petitioners in CR Nos.120and 137 of 2018.
At the joint request of learned counsel for the parties, list
on 23.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 04, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Asa Nand & Sons and others vs. Arvind Kumar Sood
a/w connected mattersCivil Revision No.52 of 2018 a/w Civil Revision No.63,
.
120 and 137 of 2018
04.06.2025 Present: Mr. Bimal Gupta, Senior Advocate with Ms. Kusum
Chaudhary, Advocate, for the petitioners in CR Nos.52 &63 of 2018 and for the respondents in CR Nos.120 and
137 of 2018.
Mr. Vipin Pandit, Advocate, for the respondents in CR
Nos.52 & 63 of 2018 and for the petitioners in CR Nos.120and 137 of 2018.
At the joint request of learned counsel for the parties, list
on 23.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 04, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Raj Kumari and another vs. Bimla Devi and others
CMPMO No.299 of 2017
.
04.06.2025 Present: Mr. Mohit Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. H.R. Jhingta, Advocate, for respondents No.12 to 17.
Respondents No.9 and 10 are stated to have expired.
At the request of learned counsel for the petitioners, list on
01.07.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 04, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Madan Lal and others vs. Kalawati
Civil Revision No.73 of 2022
.
04.06.2025 Present: Mr. Somesh Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Karun Negi,
Advocate, for the petitioners.
Ms. Dhanwanti, Advocate, vice Mr. Sanjay Bhardwaj,
Advocate, for the respondent.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners
seeks time to comply with order dated 28.03.2025.
Let the needful be done on or before the next date of
hearing. List on 20.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 04, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Harnam Singh and others vs. State of HP and
othersRFA No.32 of 2020
.
04.06.2025 Present: Mr. Kunal Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. Ajay Chauhan,
Advocate, for appellants No.1 to 6.
Ms. Shalini Thakur, Advocate, for the proposed LRs. Of
deceased appellant No.7, who is stated to have expired.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.1/State.
Mr. Shashi Shirshoo, Advocate, for respondents No.2 & 3.
CMP No.12580 of 2025
Reply, if any, be filed on behalf of the non-applicants within
a period of four weeks. List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 04, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
The Renukaji Dam Project and another vs. Kalyan Singh
and othersCMP No.10183 of 2025 in RFA No.137 of 2018
.
04.06.2025 Present: Mr. Yashveer Singh Rathore, Advocate, vice Mr. Vivek Negi,
Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Vaibhav Kanwar, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 12,
16, 17, 19 to 21/applicants.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondents/State.
Respondent No.13 already ex parte.
CMP No.10183 of 2025
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicants. The non-applicants have no objection, if in case the
amount lying deposited in this Registry of this Court along-with
proportionate interest accrued thereupon, is released in favour of the
applicants, as is being sought in the application.
The appeal, in the case at hand, was disposed of by a Co-
ordinate Bench of this Court on 09.12.2019. Learned counsel for the
parties submit that no further proceedings against the said decision
are pending before the Hon’ble Apex Court.
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is
allowed. The amount lying deposited in the Registry of this Court
along-with proportionate interest accrued thereupon is ordered to be
released in favour of the applicants/respondents No.2 to 9, 10 to 13,
16, 17, 20 & 21, in terms of their shares, detailed in Paragraph-3 of
the application. The amount be remitted to the bank accounts,
details whereof, have been given in Paragraph-4 of the application,
subject to proper verification. The application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 04, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Yogesh Kumar vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Cr.MP(M) No.956 of 2025
.
04.06.2025 Present: Mr. Sangram Singh Chandel, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
ASI Yash Pal Singh, Police Station, Sadar Solan, District
Solan, Himachal Pradesh, is present along with record.
Status report stands filed. The same is taken on record.
Copy, whereof, has been supplied to learned counsel for the
petitioner, who intends to go through the same.
From perusal of the status report, it is evident that in all
there are 16 witnesses to be examined, out of which, one has
been examined. For recording of the remaining evidence, the
case is now fixed from 02.07.2025 to 08.07.2025. The entire
evidence is to be recorded during the said period.
In view thereof, list the present petition for consideration
on 09.07.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 04, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Rakesh Kumar vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Cr.MP(M) No.821 of 2025
.
04.06.2025 Present: Mr. Vipin Pandit and Mr. Parikshit Sharma, Advocates, for the
petitioner.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
Ms. Suchitra Sen, Advocate, for the complainant.
ASI Rajeev Kumar, I/O Police Station, Baddi, District
Solan, Himachal Pradesh, is present along with record.
At the request of learned counsel for the petitioner, list for
consideration on 28.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 04, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Rakesh Kumar vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Cr.MP(M) No.803 of 2025
.
04.06.2025 Present: Mr. Ajay Sipahiya, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
SI Yash Pal Singh, Police Station, Sadar Solan, District
Solan, Himachal Pradesh, is present along with record.
At the request of learned counsel for the petitioner, list for
consideration on 20.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 04, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Yuvraj Kumar vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Cr.MP(M) No.599 of 2025
.
04.06.2025 Present: Mr. Anirudh Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
ASI Mahinder Singh, WPS, Baddi, District Solan, Himachal
Pradesh, is present along with record.
25.06.2025.
r to
The case before the trial Court is fixed for recording ofevidence on 11.06.2025. In view thereof, list the matter on
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 04, 2025 (KS) Judge::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
M/s Sri Sai Electronics vs. State Bank of India and
another
RSA No.63 of 2025.
04.06.2025 Present: Mr. Ashok Kumar Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
Steps for the service of respondents be positively taken
within three days. On taking such steps, issue notice to the
respondents, returnable within four weeks.
June 04, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Sanjay Pardesi vs. Kripa Ram and another
Civil Suit No.21 of 2025
.
04.06.2025 Present: Ms. Chehak Khurana, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Mr. Ashwani Kondal, Advocate for the defendants.
Civil Suit No.21 of 2025
Written statement, as prayed, be filed within a period of
four weeks. List thereafter.
OMP No.432 of 2025
Reply, if any, be filed on or before the next date of hearing.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 04, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Daulat Ram vs. HRTC and another
Execution Petition No.556 of 2025
.
04.06.2025 Present: Ms. Anchal Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Balwant Singh
Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate, for the respondents.
Notice. Mr. Raman Jamalta, learned Advocate, appears
and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents and
seeks time to file reply.
Reply/instructions on behalf of the respondents be filed on
or before the next date of hearing. List on 21.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 04, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Nar Singh vs. HRTC and another
Execution Petition No.550 of 2025
.
04.06.2025 Present: Ms. Anchal Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Balwant Singh
Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate, for the respondents.
Notice. Mr. Raman Jamalta, learned Advocate, appears
and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents and
seeks time to file reply.
Reply/instructions on behalf of the respondents be filed on
or before the next date of hearing. List on 21.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 04, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Rajesh Pal vs. HRTC and another
Execution Petition No.549 of 2025
.
04.06.2025 Present: Ms. Anchal Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Balwant Singh
Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate, for the respondents.
Notice. Mr. Raman Jamalta, learned Advocate, appears
and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents and
seeks time to file reply.
Reply/instructions on behalf of the respondents be filed on
or before the next date of hearing. List on 21.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 04, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Vinay Kumar vs. HRTC and another
Execution Petition No.548 of 2025
.
04.06.2025 Present: Ms. Anchal Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Balwant Singh
Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate, for the respondents.
Notice. Mr. Raman Jamalta, learned Advocate, appears
and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents and
seeks time to file reply.
Reply/instructions on behalf of the respondents be filed on
or before the next date of hearing. List on 21.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 04, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Sanjay Kumar vs. HRTC and another
Execution Petition No.547 of 2025
.
04.06.2025 Present: Ms. Anchal Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Balwant Singh
Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate, for the respondents.
Notice. Mr. Raman Jamalta, learned Advocate, appears
and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents and
seeks time to file reply.
Reply/instructions on behalf of the respondents be filed on
or before the next date of hearing. List on 21.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 04, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Girdhari Lal vs. HRTC and another
Execution Petition No.545 of 2025
.
04.06.2025 Present: Ms. Anchal Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Balwant Singh
Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate, for the respondents.
Notice. Mr. Raman Jamalta, learned Advocate, appears
and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents and
seeks time to file reply.
Reply/instructions on behalf of the respondents be filed on
or before the next date of hearing. List on 21.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 04, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Nilam Dass vs. HRTC and another
Execution Petition No.544 of 2025
.
04.06.2025 Present: Ms. Anchal Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Balwant Singh
Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate, for the respondents.
Notice. Mr. Raman Jamalta, learned Advocate, appears
and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents and
seeks time to file reply.
Reply/instructions on behalf of the respondents be filed on
or before the next date of hearing. List on 21.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 04, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Raj Kumar vs. HRTC and another
Execution Petition No.542 of 2025
.
04.06.2025 Present: Ms. Anchal Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Balwant Singh
Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate, for the respondents.
Notice. Mr. Raman Jamalta, learned Advocate, appears
and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents and
seeks time to file reply.
Reply/instructions on behalf of the respondents be filed on
or before the next date of hearing. List on 21.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 04, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Parkash Kumar vs. HRTC and another
Execution Petition No.541 of 2025
.
04.06.2025 Present: Ms. Anchal Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Balwant Singh
Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate, for the respondents.
Notice. Mr. Raman Jamalta, learned Advocate, appears
and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents and
seeks time to file reply.
Reply/instructions on behalf of the respondents be filed on
or before the next date of hearing. List on 21.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 04, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Ranvir Chand Katoch vs. State of HP and others
RSA No.261 of 2023
.
03.06.2025 Present: Mr. Dushyant Dadwal, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. R.P. Singh, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents
No.1 to 4/State.
Mr. Romesh Verma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Digvijay
Singh Bisht, Advocate, for respondents No.6 to 11.
None for respondent No.5.
CMP No.17176 of 2023
Rejoinder is stated to have been filed. However, the same
are not on record. Learned counsel for the respondents submit
that they have received the copy of the same.
Registry to trace the rejoinder so filed and place it on
record well before the next date of hearing, post removal of
objection(s), if any.
List on 24.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 03, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Kashmir Singh vs. State of HP and others
CMPMO No.190 of 2023
.
03.06.2025 Present: Mr. P.S. Goverdhan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rakesh
Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. R.P. Singh, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents
No.1 and 2.
Mr. Malay Kaushal, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
At the request of learned counsel for the petitioner, in
order to enable him to have instructions in the matter, list on
18.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 03, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Savitri Devi vs. Sharif Mohammad
CMPMO No.555 of 2022
.
03.06.2025 Present: Mr. Munish Kumar, Advocate, vice Mr. Yuyutsu Singh
Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Surinder Saklani, Advocate, for the respondent.
Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner
submits that the original counsel is unavailable today on account
of personal difficulty. He seeks an adjournment. Prayer allowed.
List for consideration after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 03, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Jagiri Lal vs. Om Prakash and another
Civil Revision No.74 of 2021
.
03.06.2025 Present: Mr. Amrick Singh, Advocate, vice Mr. B.R. Kashyap,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Abhinav Purohit, Advocate, vice Mr. Piyush Dhanotia,
Advocate, for the respondents.
Mr. Abhinav Purohit, learned vice counsel appearing on
behalf of the respondents submits that power of attorney on
behalf of the respondents stands filed.
As jointly prayed, list after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 03, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Ram Singh and another vs. Labh Singh and others
CMPMO No.21 of 2021
.
03.06.2025 Present: Mr. Y.P. Sood, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Ajay Chandel, Advocate, for the respondents.
At the request of learned counsel for the petitioners, list
after three weeks.
June 03, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Jubli Ram vs. State of HP
RSA No.4 of 2020
.
03.06.2025 Present: Mr. Ravinder Singh, Advocate, vice Mr. Vinay Sharma,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant
submits that the appellant has lost the brief and seeks time to
reconstruct the same.
In view thereof, list the matter on 26.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 03, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Shamsher Masih vs. Menu Parkash
CMPMO No.465 of 2019
.
03.06.2025 Present: Mr. Aman Sood, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate, for the respondent.
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks time to place on
record order passed by the trial Court prior to 24.04.2017, where
from, it is evident that affidavits filed on behalf of PW-5, PW-6 &
PW-7 (examination-in-chief), had been furnished to the present
respondent, a date prior to 24.04.2017 and have been placed on
record on the Court file, a date prior to 24.04.2017.
List on 26.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 03, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Chander Bhan vs. HRTC and another
Execution Petition No.535 of 2025
.
03.06.2025 Present: Ms. Anchal Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Balwant Singh
Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate, for the respondents.
Notice. Mr. Raman Jamalta, learned Advocate, appears
and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents and
seeks time to file reply.
Reply/instructions on behalf of the respondents be filed on
or before the next date of hearing. List on 21.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 03, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Som Dutt vs. HRTC and another
Execution Petition No.534 of 2025
.
03.06.2025 Present: Ms. Anchal Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Balwant Singh
Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate, for the respondents.
Notice. Mr. Raman Jamalta, learned Advocate, appears
and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents and
seeks time to file reply.
Reply/instructions on behalf of the respondents be filed on
or before the next date of hearing. List on 21.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 03, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Joginder Singh vs. HRTC and another
Execution Petition No.533 of 2025
.
03.06.2025 Present: Ms. Anchal Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Balwant Singh
Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate, for the respondents.
Notice. Mr. Raman Jamalta, learned Advocate, appears
and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents and
seeks time to file reply.
Reply/instructions on behalf of the respondents be filed on
or before the next date of hearing. List on 21.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 03, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Vipan Kumar vs. HRTC and another
Execution Petition No.532 of 2025
.
03.06.2025 Present: Ms. Anchal Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Balwant Singh
Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate, for the respondents.
Notice. Mr. Raman Jamalta, learned Advocate, appears
and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents and
seeks time to file reply.
Reply/instructions on behalf of the respondents be filed on
or before the next date of hearing. List on 21.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 03, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Raj Kumar vs. HRTC and another
Execution Petition No.540 of 2025
.
03.06.2025 Present: Ms. Anchal Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Balwant Singh
Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate, for the respondents.
Notice. Mr. Raman Jamalta, learned Advocate, appears
and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents and
seeks time to file reply.
Reply/instructions on behalf of the respondents be filed on
or before the next date of hearing. List on 21.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 03, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Sunil Kalta vs. HRTC and another
Execution Petition No.539 of 2025
.
03.06.2025 Present: Ms. Anchal Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Balwant Singh
Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate, for the respondents.
Notice. Mr. Raman Jamalta, learned Advocate, appears
and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents and
seeks time to file reply.
Reply/instructions on behalf of the respondents be filed on
or before the next date of hearing. List on 21.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 03, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Om Parkash vs. HRTC and another
Execution Petition No.538 of 2025
.
03.06.2025 Present: Ms. Anchal Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Balwant Singh
Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate, for the respondents.
Notice. Mr. Raman Jamalta, learned Advocate, appears
and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents and
seeks time to file reply.
Reply/instructions on behalf of the respondents be filed on
or before the next date of hearing. List on 21.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 03, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Naginder Singh vs. HRTC and another
Execution Petition No.529 of 2025
.
03.06.2025 Present: Ms. Anchal Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Balwant Singh
Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate, for the respondents.
Notice. Mr. Raman Jamalta, learned Advocate, appears
and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents and
seeks time to file reply.
Reply/instructions on behalf of the respondents be filed on
or before the next date of hearing. List on 21.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 03, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Rajesh Singh vs. HRTC and another
Execution Petition No.528 of 2025
.
03.06.2025 Present: Ms. Anchal Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Balwant Singh
Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate, for the respondents.
Notice. Mr. Raman Jamalta, learned Advocate, appears
and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents and
seeks time to file reply.
Reply/instructions on behalf of the respondents be filed on
or before the next date of hearing. List on 21.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 03, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Rakesh Kumar vs. HRTC and another
Execution Petition No.523 of 2025
.
03.06.2025 Present: Ms. Anchal Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Balwant Singh
Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate, for the respondents.
Notice. Mr. Raman Jamalta, learned Advocate, appears
and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents and
seeks time to file reply.
Reply/instructions on behalf of the respondents be filed on
or before the next date of hearing. List on 21.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 03, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Jagat Kishore vs. HRTC and another
Execution Petition No.504 of 2025
.
03.06.2025 Present: Ms. Anchal Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Balwant Singh
Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate, for the respondents.
Notice. Mr. Raman Jamalta, learned Advocate, appears
and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents and
seeks time to file reply.
Reply/instructions on behalf of the respondents be filed on
or before the next date of hearing. List on 21.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 03, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Dinesh Verma vs. HRTC and another
Execution Petition No.537 of 2025
.
03.06.2025 Present: Ms. Anchal Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Balwant Singh
Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate, for the respondents.
Notice. Mr. Raman Jamalta, learned Advocate, appears
and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents and
seeks time to file reply.
Reply/instructions on behalf of the respondents be filed on
or before the next date of hearing. List on 21.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 03, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Vijay Kumar vs. HRTC and another
Execution Petition No.536 of 2025
.
03.06.2025 Present: Ms. Anchal Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Balwant Singh
Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate, for the respondents.
Notice. Mr. Raman Jamalta, learned Advocate, appears
and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents and
seeks time to file reply.
Reply/instructions on behalf of the respondents be filed on
or before the next date of hearing. List on 21.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 03, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Parkash Chand Bhardwaj and another vs. The Kangra
Central Cooperative Bank Limited.
CMPMO No.122 of 2021
02.06.2025 Present: Mr. Parv Sharma and Mr. Shekhar Badola, Advocates, for the
petitioner.
Mr. Rakesh Kumar Thakur, Advocate, for the respondent.
At the request of learned counsel for the respondent, in
19.06.2025.
r to
order to enable him to prepare the case at hand, list on( Bipin C. Negi )
June 02, 2025 (KS) Judge::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Parkash Chand Bhardwaj and another vs. The Kangra
Central Cooperative Bank Limited.
RSA No.79 of 2025
02.06.2025 Present: Mr. Parv Sharma and Mr. Shekhar Badola, Advocates, for the
petitioner.
Mr. Rakesh Kumar Thakur, Advocate, for the respondent.
At the request of learned counsel for the respondent, in
19.06.2025.
r to
order to enable him to prepare the case at hand, list on( Bipin C. Negi )
June 02, 2025 (KS) Judge::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
The State of HP and others vs. Prem Singh and othersRSA No.79 of 2025
.
02.06.2025 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
appellants/State.
Mr. Virender Kumar, Advocate, vice Mr. Vivek Chandel,
Advocate, for the respondents.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties submit
that similar matter listed before the Apex Court is coming up for
hearing on 25.07.2025.
In view thereof, list the matter in the third week of
August, 2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 02, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Yusuf vs. Nirmla Devi
RSA No.7 of 2025
.
02.06.2025 Present: Ms. Kusum Chaudhary, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Vinay Thakur, Advocate, for the respondent.
Further time prayed by the counsel for the parties to go
through the record. In view thereof, list after six weeks.
June 02, 2025 (KS) to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Narender Kumar vs. Nitin ChauhanCMPMO No.682 of 2024
.
02.06.2025 Present: Ms Rinki Kashmiri, Advocate, vice Mr. Ajeet Pal Singh
Jaswal, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms. Sakshi Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent.
Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner
submits that the original counsel is unavailable today on account
of personal difficulty. She seeks an adjournment. Prayer allowed.
List for consideration on 25.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 02, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
State of HP and others vs. Ranjit Singh and others
CMPMO No.608 of 2024
.
02.06.2025 Present: Mr. R.P. Singh, Deputy Advocate General, for the
petitioners/State.
Mr. B.M. Chauhan, Senior Advocate with Ms. Kamakshi
Tarlokta, Advocate, for respondents No.2 to 6 and for
proposed LRs. of deceased respondent No.1.
CMP(M) Nos.588 & 604 of 2025
Ms. Kamakshi Tarlokta, learned counsel, has put in
appearance on behalf of legal heirs of deceased respondent
No.1. The non-applicants do not intend to file reply to the present
application and have no objection, if in case, the applications are
allowed and the legal heirs of deceased respondent No.1 are
brought on record as is being sought in the application (CMP(M)
No.588 of 2025).
Respondent No.1 is stated to have expired on 21.02.2023.
The same is evident form the Death Certificate appended along-
with the application (CMP(M) No.588 of 2025). The details of the
legal heirs are given in Paragraph-4 of the application (CMP(M)
No.588 of 2025).
Since the right to sue inheres/survives in the legal heirs of
deceased respondent No.1, detailed in Paragraph-4 of the
application (CMP(M) No.588 of 2025), therefore, they are ordered
to be brought on record.
For the bona fide reasons stated/sufficient cause shown in
the application (CMP(M) No.604 of 2025), delay in bringing on
record the legal heirs of deceased respondent No.1, is condoned
and abatement, if any, is set aside.
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
The applications stand disposed of. Amended memo of
.
parties filed at Page-112 of the paper book is ordered to be taken
on record.
CMPMO No.608 of 2024
Power of attorney on behalf of the newly added
respondents, if not already filed, be filed within six weeks. List
thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 02, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Kanshi Ram and others vs. Jaram Singh and others
CMPMO No.245 of 2024
.
02.06.2025 Present: Mr. Goldy Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. R.L. Chaudhary, Advocate, for the respondents.
At the request of learned counsel for the petitioners, list after
four weeks.
June 02, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Dhani Ram (since deceased) through LRs. vs.
Prithvipal Singh (since deceased) through LRs.
RSA No.34 of 2024
.
02.06.2025 Present: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Atharv
Sharma, Advocate, for the appellants, except appellant
No.1(i), who is stated to have expired.
Mr. Dheeraj K. Vashisht, Advocate, for the respondents.
Certified copies of pages-38, 39, 45 to 47 and legible
copies of pages-72, 74, 75 & 76 not filed. Let the needful be
done within a period of four weeks. List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 02, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Ashok Kumar vs. Arjun Kalia and others
RSA No.97 of 2023
.
02.06.2025 Present: Mr. Sidharth Jalta, Advocate, vice Mr. V.S. Rathore,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Vinod Kumar Soni, Advocate, vice Mr. George, Advocate,
for respondent No.1.
Respondents No.2(i), 2(ii) and respondent No.3 proceeded
against ex parte.
Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant
submits that the original counsel is unavailable today on account
of personal difficulty. He seeks an adjournment. Prayer allowed.
List after six weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 02, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
HPPCL and another vs. Rajender Singh and others
RFA No.399 of 2018 a/w Cross Objection No.17 of 2019.
02.06.2025 Present: Mr. Vikas Mishra, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Kunal Thakur, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 4, 6 to
8, 9(i) to 9(iv) & 10 to 14 and for proposed LRs. of deceased
respondent No.5.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondents No.15 & 16/State.
CMP(M) No.804 of 2025
Respondent No.5 is stated to have died on 24.09.2020. The
said fact is evident from the death certificate appended along with
the application. Legal heirs of deceased respondent No.5 are
detailed in para 5 of the application and the same are in consonance
with the legal heir certificate appended along with the application.
Learned counsel for the respondents correctly points out that insofar
as deceased respondent No.5 is concerned, her LRs are already on
record as respondents No.1 and 2. In view thereof, present
application is allowed and the name of deceased respondent No.5 is
ordered to be deleted from the array of parties Fresh amended
memo of parties be filed within two weeks. Application stands
disposed of.
CMP(M) No.805 of 2025
In view of the aforesaid fact that the legal heirs of deceased
respondent No.5 already exist on record as respondents No.1 and 2,
therefore, the present application has become infructuous.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 02, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
HPPCL and another vs. Karam Chand and others
RFA No.384 of 2018 a/w Cross Objection No.18 of 201902.06.2025 Present: Mr. Shashi Shirshoo, Advocate, for the appellants.
.
Mr. Kunal Thakur, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 10,
11(a), 11(b), 12, 14 to 16, 19(a) to 19(f), 20, 21(a) to 21(b)
and for proposed LRs. of deceased respondent No.13.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondents No.22 & 23/State.
CMP(M) No.824 of 2025
Mr. Kunal Thakur, learned counsel, has put in appearance on
behalf of legal heirs of deceased respondent No.13. The non-
applicants do not intend to file reply to the present application and
have no objection, if in case, the application is allowed.
I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the
pleadings. Respondent No.13-Jagmohan is stated to have died on
22.02.2025.
The same is evident from the Death Certificate appended
along with the present application. Deceased respondent No.13 is
survived by his legal heirs, details whereof, have been given in
Paragraph-3 of the present application.
Since the right to sue inheres/survives with the legal heirs of
deceased respondent No.13, details whereof, have been given in
Paragraph-3 of the present application, therefore, they are ordered
to be brought on record. The application stands disposed of.
Amended memo of parties filed with the present application is
ordered to be taken on record.
Power of attorney on behalf of the newly added respondents
stands already filed.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 02, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
HPPCL and another vs. Karam Chand and others
RFA No.384 of 2018 a/w Cross Objection No.18 of 201902.06.2025 Present: Mr. Shashi Shirshoo, Advocate, for the appellants.
.
Mr. Kunal Thakur, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 10,
11(a), 11(b), 12, 14 to 16, 19(a) to 19(f), 20, 21(a) to 21(b)
and for proposed LRs. of deceased respondent No.13.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent2 No.22 & 23/State.
CMP(M) No.824 of 2025
Mr. Kunal Thakur, learned counsel, has put in appearance on
behalf of legal heirs of deceased respondent No.13. The non-
applicants do not intend to file reply to the present application and
have no objection, if in case, the application is allowed.
I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the
pleadings. Respondent No.13-Jagmohan is stated to have died on
22.02.2025.
The same is evident from the Death Certificate appended
along with the present application. Deceased respondent No.13 is
survived by his legal heirs, details whereof, have been given in
Paragraph-3 of the present application.
Since the right to sue inheres/survives with the legal heirs of
deceased respondent No.13, details whereof, have been given in
Paragraph-3 of the present application, therefore, they are ordered
to be brought on record. The application stands disposed of.
Amended memo of parties filed with the present application is
ordered to be taken on record.
Power of attorney on behalf of the newly added appellants
stands already filed.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 02, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Chairman-cum- Managing Director, Power Grid Corporation
of India Ltd. and another vs. Tej Ram and another.
RFA No.200 of 2018
02.06.2025 Present: Mr. Bimal Gupta, Senior Advocate with Ms. Kusum
Chaudhary, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Suri, Advocate, for proposed LRs. of
deceased respondent No.1.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.2/State.
CMP No.12365 of 2025
For the reasons stated in the application, delay in re-filing
the application (CMP(M) No.833 of 2025) is condoned. The
application stands disposed of.
CMP(M) No.833 of 2025
Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Suri, learned counsel, has put in
appearance on behalf of legal heirs of deceased respondent
No.1. The non-applicants do not intend to file reply to the present
application and have no objection, if in case, the application is
allowed.
I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused
the pleadings. Respondent No.1-Tej Ram is stated to have died
on 22.11.2020.
The same is evident from the Death Certificate appended
along with the present application as Annexure-A. Deceased
respondent No.1 is survived by his legal heirs, details whereof,
have been given in Paragraph-4 of the present application.
Since the right to sue inheres/survives with the legal heirs
of deceased respondent No.1, details whereof, have been given
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
.
in Paragraph-4 of the present application, therefore, they are
ordered to be brought on record.
For the bona fide reasons stated/sufficient cause shown in
the application, delay in bringing on record the legal heirs of
deceased respondent No.1, is condoned and abatement, if any,
is set aside.
The application stands disposed of.
Amended memo of parties be filed within a period of two
weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 02, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Luxmi (deceased) through LRs. and others vs. Rup Devi @
Rupi Devi and othersRFA No.301 of 2004
.
02.06.2025 Present: Mr. Karan Singh Kanwar, Advocate, for appellant No.2 and
for proposed appellant No.1(b).
Proposed LRs. No.1(a), 1(c), 1(d), 1(f) and 1(g) proceeded
against ex parte vide order dated 03.10.2024.
Mr. Abhishek, Advocate, vice Ms. Rachna Kuthiala,
Advocate, for respondent No.2(a) to 2(d).
Further two weeks’ time prayed for filing correct address for
effecting service on LR No.A-1(e).
On taking steps within two weeks, issue notice to the said
proposed LR, returnable within four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 02, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Luxmi (deceased) through LRs. and others vs. Rup Devi @
Rupi Devi and othersRFA No.301 of 2004
.
02.06.2025 Present: Mr. Karan Singh Kanwar, Advocate, for appellant No.2 and
for proposed appellant No.1(b).
Proposed LRs. No.1(a), 1(c), 1(d), 1(f) and 1(g) proceeded
against ex parte vide order dated 03.10.2024.
Mr. Abhishek, Advocate, vice Ms. Rachna Kuthiala,
Advocate, for respondent No.2(a) to 2(d).
Further two weeks’ time prayed for filing correct address for
effecting service on LR No.A-1(e).
On taking steps within two weeks, issue notice to the said
proposed LR, returnable within four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 02, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Amar Singh vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Cr.MP(M) No.1277 of 2025
.
02.06.2025 Present: Mr. Nand Lal Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
Notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate
General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the
respondent-State and seeks time to file status report.
List on 02.07.2025. Status report be filed on or before the
next date of hearing.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 02, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Kimti Lal (deceased) through LRs. vs. Suman Sharma and
othersCMPMO No.273 of 2025
.
02.06.2025 Present: Mr. Mohit Jaitak, Advocate, for the petitioners, through
video conferencing.
Mr. Jai Ram Sharma, Advocate, for the respondents.
CMPMO No.273 of 2025 & CMP No.12530 of 2025
Notice. Mr. Jai Ram Sharma, learned counsel, appears and
waives service of notice on behalf of respondents.
List on 16.07.2025 In the meanwhile, the petitioners/tenants
shall deposit the arrears of use and occupation charges/mesne
profit, as have been determined by the first appellate Court, on or
before the next date of hearing.
In the meanwhile, power of attorney on behalf of the
respondents be also filed.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 02, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Mandeep Singh and another vs. Savitri Devi and others
RSA No.110 of 2025
.
02.06.2025 Present: Mr. Romesh Verma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Digvijay
Singh, Advocate, for the appellants.
At the request of learned counsel for the appellants, list
after two weeks.
June 02, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Bhisham Dutt vs. HRTC and another
Execution Petition No.521 of 2025
.
02.06.2025 Present: Ms. Anchal Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Balwant Singh
Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate, for the respondents.
Notice. Mr. Raman Jamalta, learned Advocate, appears
and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents and
seeks time to file reply.
Reply/instructions on behalf of the respondents be filed on
or before the next date of hearing. List on 21.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 02, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Rajinder Singh vs. HRTC and another
Execution Petition No.517 of 2025
.
02.06.2025 Present: Ms. Anchal Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Balwant Singh
Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate, for the respondents.
Notice. Mr. Raman Jamalta, learned Advocate, appears
and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents and
seeks time to file reply.
Reply/instructions on behalf of the respondents be filed on
or before the next date of hearing. List on 21.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 02, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Yanoo Ram vs. HRTC and another
Execution Petition No.515 of 2025
.
02.06.2025 Present: Ms. Anchal Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Balwant Singh
Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate, for the respondents.
Notice. Mr. Raman Jamalta, learned Advocate, appears
and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents and
seeks time to file reply.
Reply/instructions on behalf of the respondents be filed on
or before the next date of hearing. List on 21.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 02, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Vinod Kumar vs. HRTC and another
Execution Petition No.514 of 2025
.
02.06.2025 Present: Ms. Anchal Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Balwant Singh
Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate, for the respondents.
Notice. Mr. Raman Jamalta, learned Advocate, appears
and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents and
seeks time to file reply.
Reply/instructions on behalf of the respondents be filed on
or before the next date of hearing. List on 21.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 02, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Hoshiar Singh vs. HRTC and another
Execution Petition No.512 of 2025
.
02.06.2025 Present: Ms. Anchal Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Balwant Singh
Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate, for the respondents.
Notice. Mr. Raman Jamalta, learned Advocate, appears
and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents and
seeks time to file reply.
Reply/instructions on behalf of the respondents be filed on
or before the next date of hearing. List on 21.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 02, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Dhana Singh vs. HRTC and another
Execution Petition No.511 of 2025
.
02.06.2025 Present: Ms. Anchal Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Balwant Singh
Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate, for the respondents.
Notice. Mr. Raman Jamalta, learned Advocate, appears
and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents and
seeks time to file reply.
Reply/instructions on behalf of the respondents be filed on
or before the next date of hearing. List on 21.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 02, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Rajinder Kumar vs. HRTC and another
Execution Petition No.510 of 2025
.
02.06.2025 Present: Ms. Anchal Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Balwant Singh
Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate, for the respondents.
Notice. Mr. Raman Jamalta, learned Advocate, appears
and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents and
seeks time to file reply.
Reply/instructions on behalf of the respondents be filed on
or before the next date of hearing. List on 21.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 02, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Kajan Singh vs. HRTC and another
Execution Petition No.509 of 2025
.
02.06.2025 Present: Ms. Anchal Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Balwant Singh
Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate, for the respondents.
Notice. Mr. Raman Jamalta, learned Advocate, appears
and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents and
seeks time to file reply.
Reply/instructions on behalf of the respondents be filed on
or before the next date of hearing. List on 21.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 02, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Som Prakash vs. HRTC and another
Execution Petition No.508 of 2025
.
02.06.2025 Present: Ms. Anchal Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Balwant Singh
Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate, for the respondents.
Notice. Mr. Raman Jamalta, learned Advocate, appears
and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents and
seeks time to file reply.
Reply/instructions on behalf of the respondents be filed on
or before the next date of hearing. List on 21.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 02, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Sawaran Singh vs. HRTC and another
Execution Petition No.181 of 2025
.
02.06.2025 Present: Ms. Anchal Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Sat Parkash,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate, for the respondents.
At the request of learned counsel for the respondents, list
on 21.06.2025.
June 02, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Satin Kumar vs. HRTC and others
Execution Petition No.180 of 2025
.
02.06.2025 Present: Ms. Anchal Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Sat Parkash,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate, for the respondents.
At the request of learned counsel for the respondents, list
on 21.06.2025.
June 02, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Jagdeep Singh vs. HRTC and another
Execution Petition No.179 of 2025
.
02.06.2025 Present: Ms. Anchal Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Sat Parkash,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate, for the respondents.
At the request of learned counsel for the respondents, list
on 21.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 02, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Rajender Pal vs. HRTC and another
Execution Petition No.136 of 2025
.
02.06.2025 Present: Ms. Anchal Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Manohar Lal
Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate, for the respondents.
At the request of learned counsel for the respondents, list
on 21.06.2025.
June 02, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Karam Chand vs. HRTC and another
Execution Petition No.135 of 2025
.
02.06.2025 Present: Ms. Anchal Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Manohar Lal
Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate, for the respondents.
At the request of learned counsel for the respondents, list
on 21.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 02, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Narender Banjtu vs. HRTC and another
Execution Petition No.513 of 2025
.
02.06.2025 Present: Ms. Anchal Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Balwant Singh
Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate, for the respondents.
Notice. Mr. Raman Jamalta, learned Advocate, appears
and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents and
seeks time to file reply.
Reply/instructions on behalf of the respondents be filed on
or before the next date of hearing. List on 21.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 02, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
The Highway Administrator and Project vs. Bhola Ram and
othersArbitration Appeal No.208 of 2025
.
02.06.2025 Present: Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocate, vice Mr. Sumeet Raj Sharma,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondents No.4 & 5/State.
Arbitration Appeal No.208/2025 & OMP No.710/2025
Notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate
General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of
respondents No.4 and 5/State. On taking steps within three days,
issue notice to respondents No.1 to 3, returnable within four weeks.
List after four weeks. In the meanwhile, operation and
execution of impugned judgment dated 02.01.2025, passed by
learned District Judge, Mandi Division, District Mandi, Himachal
Pradesh, in CIS Registration/Arbitration Act No.704 of 2024, titled
The Highway Administrator Officer vs. Bhola Ram and others and
Award No.494/18 dated 03.11.2023, shall remain stayed, subject to
deposit of the entire awarded amount along-with up-to-date interest
within a period of four weeks.
OMP No.711 of 2025
The applicant is directed to file certified copies of A/2 to A/6,
in question, annexed with the accompanying appeal on or before the
next date of hearing.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 02, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
The Highway Administrator and Project vs. Kamlu and
others.
Arbitration Appeal No.207 of 2025
02.06.2025 Present: Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocate, vice Mr. Sumeet Raj Sharma,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondents No.4 & 5/State.
Arbitration Appeal No.207/2025 & OMP No.706/2025
Notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate
General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of
respondents No.4 and 5/State. On taking steps within three days,
issue notice to respondents No.1 to 3, returnable within four weeks.
List after four weeks. In the meanwhile, operation and
execution of impugned judgment dated 02.01.2025, passed by
learned District Judge, Mandi Division, District Mandi, Himachal
Pradesh, in CIS Registration/Arbitration Act No.720 of 2024, titled
The Highway Administrator Officer vs. Kamlu and others and Award
No.505/18 dated 03.11.2023, shall remain stayed, subject to deposit
of the entire awarded amount along-with up-to-date interest within a
period of four weeks.
OMP No.707 of 2025
The applicant is directed to file certified copies of A/2 to A/6,
in question, annexed with the accompanying appeal on or before the
next date of hearing.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 02, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
The Highway Administrator and Project vs. Sangat Ram
(now deceased) through LRs.
.
Arbitration Appeal No.206 of 2025
02.06.2025 Present: Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocate, vice Mr. Sumeet Raj Sharma,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondents No.4 & 5/State.
Arbitration Appeal No.206/2025 & OMP No.704/2025
Notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate
General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of
respondents No.4 and 5/State. On taking steps within three days,
issue notice to respondents No.1 to 3, returnable within four weeks.
List after four weeks. In the meanwhile, operation and
execution of impugned judgment dated 02.01.2025, passed by
learned District Judge, Mandi Division, District Mandi, Himachal
Pradesh, in CIS Registration/Arbitration Act No.733 of 2024, titled
The Highway Administrator Officer vs. Sangat Ram (now deceased)
through his LRs. and others and Award No.495/18 dated
03.11.2023, shall remain stayed, subject to deposit of the entire
awarded amount along-with up-to-date interest within a period of
four weeks.
OMP No.705 of 2025
The applicant is directed to file certified copies of A/2 to A/6,
in question, annexed with the accompanying appeal on or before the
next date of hearing.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 02, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Suresh Kumar vs. Jai Parkash and others
RSA No.65 of 2025
.
02.06.2025 Present: Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate, vice Mr. V.D. Khidtta,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant
submits that the original counsel is unavailable today on account
of personal difficulty. He seeks an adjournment. Prayer allowed.
r to
List after two weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 02, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Bishan Dass and another vs. Devi Chand (deceased)
through LRs. and othersRSA No.60 of 2025
.
02.06.2025 Present: Mr. Rajesh Mandhotra, Advocate, for the appellants.
At the request of learned counsel for the appellants, list after
two weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
June 02, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
LAC, HPPWD vs. Surinder Kumar and others
CMP(M) No.1099 of 2024
.
30.05.2025 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General for the applicant/
appellant.
Mr. Lalit Kumar Sehgal, Advocate, for respondents No.1 and 2
and proposed LRs No.3(a) to 3(b).
CMP(M) Nos.2067 & 2068 of 2024
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-applicants.
The non applicant have no objection, if in case, the applications are
allowed and the legal heirs of deceased respondent No.3 are brought
on record as is being sought in the application (CMP(M) No.2067 of
2024).
Respondent No.3 is stated to have expired on 09.02.2023. The
same is evident form the Death Certificate appended along-with the
application (CMP(M) No.2067 of 2024). The details of the legal heirs
are given in Paragraph-4 of the application (CMP(M) No.2067 of 2024).
Since the right to sue inheres/survives in the legal heirs of
deceased respondent No.3, detailed in Paragraph-4 of the application
(CMP(M) No.2067 of 2024), therefore, they are ordered to be brought
on record.
For the bona fide reasons stated/sufficient cause shown in the
application (CMP(M) No.2068 of 2024), delay in bringing on record the
legal heirs of deceased respondent No.3, is condoned and abatement,
if any, is set aside.
The applications stand disposed of. Amended memo of parties
filed with the applications is ordered to be taken on record.
CMP(M) No.1099 of 2024
List after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 30, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Gurnam Singh and others vs. LAC and others
CMP(M) No.1086 of 2024
.
30.05.2025 Present: Mr. O.C. Sharma, Advocate, for the applicants.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for respondents
No.1 to 3/State.
CMP(M) Nos.521 & 522 of 2025
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-applicants.
The non applicant have no objection, if in case, the applications are
allowed and the legal heirs of deceased respondent No.4 are brought
on record as is being sought in the application (CMP(M) No.521 of
2025).
Respondent No.4 is stated to have expired on 15.08.2021. The
same is evident form the Death Certificate appended along-with the
application (CMP(M) No.521 of 2025) as Annexure A-I. The details of
the legal heirs are given in Paragraph-5 of the application (CMP(M)
No.521 of 2025).
Since the right to sue inheres/survives in the legal heirs of
deceased respondent No.4, detailed in Paragraph-5 of the application
(CMP(M) No.521 of 2025), therefore, they are ordered to be brought on
record.
For the bona fide reasons stated/sufficient cause shown in the
application (CMP(M) No.522 of 2025), delay in bringing on record the
legal heirs of deceased respondent No.4, is condoned and abatement,
if any, is set aside.
The applications stand disposed of. Amended memo of parties
be filed within four weeks. List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 30, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Ajay Kumar(deceased) through LRs. And others vs. Veena
Devi and others a/w connected matter
RSA Nos.295 & 298 of 2024
.
30.05.2025 Present: Mr. Amit Jamwal, Advocate, vice Mr. Surinder Saklani,
Advocate, for the appellants, in both the appeals.
Ms Shwetima Dogra, Advocate, vice Mr. Vinod Gupta,
Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Jagmohan Singh Chandel, Advocate, for respondents
No.3(i) to 3(iii).
Respondent No.2(i) to 2(iv) proceeded against ex parte
vide order dated 12.03.2025.
CMP No.11967 of 2025 in RSA No.295 of 2024
From a perusal of the judgment passed by the first
appellate Court, specifically case (Civil Appeal No.62-13 of 2013
titled Ajay Kumar (deceased) through LRs. vs. Veena Devi and
others) at Page-25, it is evident that the names of legal heirs of
deceased respondents No.2 and 3 had been ordered to be
deleted vide order dated 13.12.2023 passed by the first appellate
Court. In this respect, order passed by the first appellate Court
has also been appended along-with present application.
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is
allowed. Names of legal heirs of deceased respondent No.2(i) to
2(iv) and 3(i) to 3(iii) are ordered to be deleted from the array of
the parties.
The application stands disposed of. Amended memo of
parties be filed within four weeks. List thereafter.
RSA No.295 of 2024
The same changes be also made in the cause title of the
present appeal.
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:34 :::CIS
Amended memo of parties be filed within four weeks. List
.
thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 30, 2025 (KS) Judge
r to
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Ramesh Chand and others vs. State of HP and others
Civil Revision No.175 of 2023
.
30.05.2025 Present: Mr. Tarun Brakta, Advocate, vice Mr. Atharv Sharma,
Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.1/State.
Respondents No.2 to 5, 7 to 17, 19 to 23 and 25 to 30
already proceeded against ex parte vide order dated
12.03.2024.
CMP(M) No.819 of 2025
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the legal
heirs of deceased respondent No.10, details whereof, have been
given in Paragraph-2 of the application, returnable within four
weeks.
CMP No.12179 of 2025
Allowed and the applicants are exempted from filing
translated copies of the documents, in question, annexed with the
accompanying application, at this stage, subject to filing of the
same within seven days, as and when directed to do so. The
application stands disposed of.
CMP(M) No.820 of 2025
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the legal
heirs of deceased respondent No.42, details whereof, have been
given in Paragraph-2 of the application, returnable within four
weeks.
CMP No.12183 of 2025
Allowed and the applicants are exempted from filing
translated copies of the documents, in question, annexed with the
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
accompanying application, at this stage, subject to filing of the
.
same within seven days, as and when directed to do so. The
application stands disposed of.
CMP(M) No.822 of 2025
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the legal
heirs of deceased respondent No.49, details whereof, have been
given in Paragraph-2 of the application, returnable within four
weeks. r
CMP No.12189 of 2025
Allowed and the applicants are exempted from filing
translated copies of the documents, in question, annexed with the
accompanying application, at this stage, subject to filing of the
same within seven days, as and when directed to do so. The
application stands disposed of.
CMP(M) No.823 of 2025
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the legal
heirs of deceased respondent No.51, details whereof, have been
given in Paragraph-2 of the application, returnable within four
weeks.
CMP No.12185 of 2025
Allowed and the applicants are exempted from filing
translated copies of the documents, in question, annexed with the
accompanying application, at this stage, subject to filing of the
same within seven days, as and when directed to do so. The
application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 30, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Hardyal Singh and others vs. Hardyal Singh (deceased)
through LRs.
.
CMPMO No.95 of 2022
30.05.2025 Present: Mr. Sambhav Bhasin, Advocate, vice Mr. Harsh Khanna,
Advocate, for petitioners No.2 to 4.
Petitioner No.1 is stated to have expired.
Mr. Romesh Verma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sumit
Sharma, Advocate, for the respondents.
Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of petitioners
No.2 to 4 prays for an adjournment on account of non-availability
of the original counsel.
As prayed, list on 20.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 30, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Hardyal Singh and others vs. Hardyal Singh (deceased)
through LRs.
CMPMO No.95 of 2022
.
30.05.2025 Present: Mr. Sambhav Bhasin, Advocate, vice Mr. Harsh Khanna,
Advocate, for petitioners No.2 to 4.
Petitioner No.1 is stated to have expired.
Mr. Romesh Verma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sumit
Sharma, Advocate, for the respondents.
Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of petitioners
No.2 to 4 prays for an adjournment on account of non-availability
of the original counsel.
As prayed, list on 20.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 30, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Dharam Chand and others vs. Vidya Devi and others
RSA No.227 of 2021
.
30.05.2025 Present: Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, Senior Advocate with Ms. Sana
Rana, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 10,
12 and 14.
None for remaining respondents.
CMP No.20246 of 2024
The present application has been filed under Order 41
Rule 27 read with Section 151 of the Civil Procedure Code for
production of additional evidence. The same has to be heard
along with the main appeal at the stage of final hearing.
Reply, if any, be filed in the meanwhile.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 30, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Bhagwan Chand vs. Jai Krishan and others a/w
connected matter
RSA No.157 of 2020 a/w
.
RSA No.158 of 2020
30.05.2025 Present: Mr. Devender K. Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. C.N. Singh,
Advocate, for the appellant, in both the appeals.
Mr. Gautam Sood, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 3, 5
and 6, in both the appeals.
None for proposed LR No.4(a).
CMP(M) Nos.1473 & 1474 of 2024 in RSA No.157 of
2020
LR No.4(b) and 4(c) stand served. However, there is no
appearance on their behalf. Hence, they are proceeded against
ex parte.
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicants. The non-applicants have no objection, if in case, the
applications are allowed and the legal heirs of deceased
respondent No.4, are brought on record as is being sought in the
application (CMP(M) No.1473 of 2024).
Respondent No.4 is stated to have expired on 30.03.2023.
The details of the legal heirs are given in Paragraph-3 of the
application (CMP(M) No.1473 of 2024).
Since the right to sue inheres/survives with the legal heirs
of deceased respondent No.4, details whereof, have been given
in Paragraph-3 of the application (CMP(M) No.1473 of 2024),
therefore, they are ordered to be brought on record.
For the bona fide reasons stated/sufficient cause shown in
the application (CMP(M) No.1474 of 2024), delay in bringing on
record the legal heirs of deceased respondent No.4, is condoned
and abatement, if any, is set aside.
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
The applications stand disposed of. Amended memo of
.
parties filed with the applications is ordered to be taken on record.
CMP No.17527 of 2024
Allowed and the applicant is exempted from filing
translated copies of documents, in question, annexed with the
accompanying appeal, at this stage, subject to filing of the same
within seven days, as and when directed to do so. The application
stands disposed of.
RSA No.157 & 158 of 2020
Further time prayed to file power of attorney on behalf of
respondents No.3, 5 and 6. Let the needful be done within four
weeks. List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 30, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Bhagat Ram (deceased) through LRs. and others vs.
Rama Nand (since deceased) through LRs. and others
.
RSA No.573 of 2019
30.05.2025 Present: Mr. Somesh Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Karun Negi, Advocate,
for the appellant.
None for respondents No.1(a) to 1(f).
Respondents No.2(a), 2(c) and 2(d) already ex parte.
Mr. Harshit Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Janesh Gupta,
Advocate, for respondents No.2(e) and 2(f), 3, 4, 6 and 7.
the respondent.
CMP No.11958 of 2025
r to
Name of respondent No.2(g) stands deleted from the array of
The case at hand was admitted vide order dated 12.08.2024.
Prior to admitting the matter on 26.03.2024, vide a detailed order, an
application filed under Order 5 Rule 20 of the Civil Procedure Code for
effecting service of respondent No.2(b) through publication in the
newspaper “Amar Ujala”, Himachal Edition, had been allowed. In
pursuance thereof, said respondent No.2(b) had been served.
In view of the aforesaid, let respondent No.2(b), post admission,
be served by way of publication in the newspaper “Amar Ujala”,
Himachal Edition, returnable for 30.07.2025.
The Publisher is directed to forward the printed material under
the postal certificate to respondent No.2(b), on given address, the proof
whereof, be submitted to this Court on or before the next date of
hearing.
Steps for service be taken within a week. The application
stands disposed of.
RSA No.573 of 2019
List on 30.07.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 30, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
National Highway Authority of India vs. Sunder Nagar
Integrated Rural Development Association
.
OMP(M) No.120 of 2025
30.05.2025 Present: Mr. Shreya Chauhan, Advocate, for the applicant/
appellant.
Mr. Neeraj Shashwat, Advocate, for the respondent.
OMP(M) No.120 of 2025
Reply has been filed today in the Court. The same is
taken on record. Copy, whereof, has been supplied to learned
counsel for the applicant.
Heard counsel for the parties.
For the reasons/sufficient cause shown in the application,
the same is allowed. Delay of 166 days in filing the present
appeal is condoned. The application stands disposed of.
Arbitration Appeal No._____/2025 & OMP No._____/2025
Be registered.
Notice. Mr. Neeraj Shashwat, learned counsel, appears
and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondent.
List on 28.06.2025. In the meanwhile, operation and
execution of impugned order dated 01.08.2024, passed by
learned District Judge, Mandi, District Mandi, Himachal Pradesh,
in CMA No.784 of 2024, titled National Highways Authority of
India vs. Sunder Nagar Integrated Rural Development
Association, shall remain stayed subject to deposit of the entire
awarded amount along-with up-to-date interest, on or before the
next date of hearing.
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
It is made clear that if no amount is deposited on or before
the next date of hearing, then the respondent shall be free to
.
execute the impugned order.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 30, 2025 (KS) Judge
r to
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Hima Devi vs. Sawani Devi and others
CMP(M) No.817 of 2025
.
30.05.2025 Present: Mr. Srishti Chauhan, Advocate, for the applicant/
appellant.
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the
respondents, returnable within four weeks.
May 30, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Ranjit Singh and others vs. Naresh Kumar and others
CMPMO No.114 of 2017
.
30.05.2025 Present: Mr. Divya Raj Singh, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Ms. Anjana Khan, Advocate, vice Ms. Seema Guleria,
Advocate, for resondents No.1 & 2.
Respondents No.3 to 5 proceeded against ex parte.
At the joint request of learned counsel for the parties, list
on 02.06.2025.
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
May 30, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Tikam Singh vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Cr.MP(M) No.755 of 2025
.
30.05.2025 Present: Mr. Ganesh Barowalia, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
Constable Vikram Singh No.190, Police Station, Shillai,
District Sirmour, Himachal Pradesh, is present along-with record.
Status report stands filed. The same is taken on record.
Copy, whereof, has been supplied to learned counsel for the
petitioner, who intends to go through the same.
List for consideration on 18.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 30, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Shakuntla Shashi and others vs. Shabnam Sood a/w
connected matters
Civil Revision No.58 of 2017 a/w Civil Revision Nos.59
.
& 60 of 2017
29.05.2025 Present: Ms. Meera Devi, Advocate, vice Mr. Balwant Kukreja,
Advocate, for the petitioner(s).
Mr. Deepak Bhasin, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sambhav
Bhasin, Advocate, for the respondent(s).
Court time is over. At the request of learned counsel for
the respondent(s), list for consideration on 27.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 29, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Liaq Ram and others vs. State of HP and another a/w
connected matters
RFA No.287 of 2017 a/w RFA Nos.29, 30, 31, 165 to 168
.
& 171 of 2018 and RFA No.472 of 2019
29.05.2025 Present: Mr. Ramesh Sharma, Advocate, for the appellants, in all
the appeals.
Mr. R.P. Singh, Deputy Advocate General, for the
respondents/State, in all the appeals.
List on 19.06.2025.
r ( Bipin C. Negi )
May 29, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Prince vs. State of H.P.
CMP(M) No.749 of 2025
.
29.05.2025 Present: Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Suri, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. R.P. Singh, Deputy Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
List on 05.06.2025. Let the victim, in the case at hand,
through her natural guardian-mother, i.e., complainant be also
informed by the concerned police authorities for the next date of
hearing.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 29, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Durgi Devi vs. Tej Ram and others
CMPMO No.80 of 2021
.
29.05.2025 Present: Mr.Gautam Sood, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Sanjeev Kuthiala, Senior Advocate with Ms. Sana
Rana, Advocate, for respondents No.1(a), 2, 4 and 5.
Mr. H.S. Rangra, Advocate, for respondent No.6.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties submit
that the proceedings pending before the trial Court are going on
and are now listed for recording of evidence of the parties. In
view thereof, list the matter after eight weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 29, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Asa Nand & Sons and others vs. Arvind Kumar Sood
a/w connected matters
.
Civil Revision No.52 of 2018 a/w Civil Revision No.63,
120 and 137 of 2018
29.05.2025 Present: Mr. Bimal Gupta, Senior Advocate with Ms. Kusum
Chaudhary, Advocate, for the petitioners in CR Nos.52 &
63 of 2018 and for the respondents in CR Nos.120 and
137 of 2018.
Mr. Vipin Pandit, Advocate, for the respondents in CR
Nos.52 & 63 of 2018 and for the petitioners in CR Nos.120
and 137 of 2018.
At the joint request of learned counsel for the parties, list
on 04.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 29, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Banarsi Dass (deceased) through LRs. vs. Baldev
Singh (deceased) through LRs. and others
Civil Revision No.67 of 2020
.
29.05.2025 Present: Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Pranjal
Munjal, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Het Ram Thakur, Advocate, for respondents No.2(a) to
2(d).
Respondents No.1(a) to 1(d) and 3(a) to 3(c) proceeded
against ex parte vide order dated 22.09.2021.
24.06.2025.
r to
At the request of learned counsel for the parties, list on
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 29, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
M/s Naziveedu Seed Limited vs. Thakur Bhagat and
others
CMP No.11879 of 2025 in
.
RFA No.267 of 2017
29.05.2025 Present: Mr. Anuj Gupta, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Ashwani Negi, Advocate, for respondent
No.1/applicant in CMP No.11879 of 2025.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for
respondents No.2 and 3/State.
CMP No.11879 of 2025
r to
Reply, if any, be filed within four weeks. List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 29, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Bakshi vs. Kishori Lal and another
CMP(M) No.770 of 2025
.
29.05.2025 Present: Mr. Mukul Sood, Advocate, for the applicant/appellant.
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the
respondents, returnable within four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 29, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
M/s Mohan Meakin Limited vs. The State of Himachal
Pradesh and others
.
OMP No.722 of 2025 in
Civil Suit No.104 of 2021
29.05.2025 Present: Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocate, for the applicant/plaintiff.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for non-
applicants/defendant No.1, 2 & 4/State.
Ms. Sneh Bhimta, Advocate, vice Ms. Shreya Chauhan,
Advocate, for non-applicant/defendant No.3.
Mr. Pawan K. Sharma, Advocate, for non-applicant/
defendant No.5.
OMP No.722 of 2025
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicants.
Heard learned counsel for the parties. For the sufficient
cause shown in the application, the same is allowed. Order dated
23.04.2025 is recalled. The Civil Suit is restored to its original
number and position.
The application stands disposed of.
Civil Suit No.104 of 2021
List of witnesses along-with diet money and process fee
be furnished within a period of three weeks from today. List the
matter before Registrar (Judicial) concerned on 23.06.2025 for
summoning the witnesses on behalf of the plaintiff for recording
their evidence.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 29, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
National Highway Authority of India vs. Harish Kumar
and others
.
OMP(M) No.149 of 2025
29.05.2025 Present: Ms. Sneh Bhimta, Advocate, vice Ms. Shreya Chauhan,
Advocate, for the applicant-appellant.
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the
respondents, returnable within four weeks.
May 29, 2025 (KS)
to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Dr. Hari Krishan Thakur vs. State of HP and another
Execution Petition Nos.69/2025 in CWP No.10093/2023
Execution Petition Nos.70/2025 in CWP No.10088/2023
.
Execution Petition Nos.75/2025 in CWP No.10094/2023
29.05.2025 Present: Mr. Aditya Chouhan, Advocate, for the petitioner(s), in all
the petitions.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondents/State.
Mr. Tek Ram Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.2, in
all the petitions.
The judgment sought to be executed, in the case at hand,
was decided on the basis of law laid down in CWP No.4586 of
2023, titled Tika Ram vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and another
a/w connected matters. Tika Ram‘s case was decided on the
basis of judgment passed in CWP No.5651 of 2023, titled
Dr. Sunil Kumar Chandel vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and
others. Dr. Sunil Kumar’s case was decided on the basis of
judgment passed in CWP No.2108 of 2023, titled Bhagat Ram vs.
Himachal Road Transport Corporation and others. In Bhagat
Ram’s case, a review petition was filed which was allowed and
the judgment passed in Bhagat Ram’s case was recalled. The
matter is now posted for 17.06.2025.
In view thereof, list in the first week of August, 2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 29, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Renuka Ji Dham and another vs. Jai Pal Singh and
others
CMP No.20548 of 2024, CMP Nos.5701 & 5702 of 2025
.
in RFA No.39 of 2019
29.05.2025 Present: Mr. Shashi Shirshoo, Advocate, for the appellant/non-
applicant.
Mr. Pawan K. Sharma, Advocate, for the
respondents/applicants.
CMP No.20548 of 2024
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents/
applicants submits that the present application has become
infructuous in view of filing of CMP Nos.5701 & 5702 of 2025.
The application stands disposed of accordingly.
CMP Nos.5701 & 5702 of 2025
Further time prayed on behalf of the non-applicants for
filing reply. Let the needful be done within two weeks. List
thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 29, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Purshotam Singh (since deceased) and others vs.
Punjab Singh
RSA No.534 of 2011
.
29.05.2025 Present: Mr. N.K. Thakur, Senior Advocate with Mr. Divya Raj
Singh, Advocate, for the appellants.
Sole respondent is stated to have expired.
Steps for bringing on record the legal heirs of deceased
sole respondent be positively taken within four weeks. List
thereafter. r
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 29, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Himachal Pradesh Power Corporation Ltd. vs. M/s
Hindustan Construction Company Limited.
Arbitration Case No.788 of 2024
.
29.05.2025 Present: Mr. Ajay Kumar Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rohit,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Advocate, for the respondents.
In pursuance to the previous order, awarded amount
along-with up-to-date interest has been deposited.
At the request of learned counsel appearing on behalf of
the respondents, list on 28.06.2024.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 29, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Parvinder Kumari vs. Chet Ram and others
RSA No.256 of 2024
.
29.05.2025 Present: Ms. Sarita Sharma and Mr. Rajat, Advocates, vice
Mr. Abhishek Banta, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. H.R. Bhardwaj, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 7
and 8(b), 8(c), 8(d), 9, 10(a), 10(b), 10(c) 10(d), 11(a) to
11(c), 12(a) to 12(c) 13 to 17.
None for respondents No.18(a), 18(b) 19, 22 to 25, 27 to
38, 39(a) and 43(a).
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants
submits that an appropriate application for deletion of names of
respondents No.20 and 26 has been filed. However, the same is
not on record.
Registry to trace the application so filed and place it on
record well before the next date of hearing, post removal of
objection(s), if any.
List after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 29, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Shakuntla Devi and others vs. LAC and others
RFA No.28 of 2024
.
29.05.2025 Present: Mr. O.C. Sharma, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for
respondents No.1 to 3/State.
Further time prayed to comply with order dated
30.04.2025. Let the needful be done within four weeks. List
thereafter.
r ( Bipin C. Negi )
May 29, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Divisional Manager, H.P. State Forest Development
Corporation Ltd. vs. Leela Devi and others
CMPMO No.645 of 2023
.
29.05.2025 Present: Ms. Himani Verma, Advocate, vice Ms. Kiran Dhiman,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Mohan Sharma, Advocate, for resndents No.1 to 8 and
10.
Respondent No.9 is stated to have expired.
CMP(M) No.808 of 025
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the legal
heirs of deceased respondent No.9, details whereof, have been
given in Paragraph-5 of the application, returnable within four
weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 29, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Krishan Chand and others vs. Anju
CMPMO No.545 of 2023
.
29.05.2025 Present: Mr. Vaibhav Tanwar, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Ms. Suchitra Sen, Advocate, for the respondent.
CMP No.14086/2023 & CMP No.14087/2023
Replies to the present applications have not been filed
since 07.10.2023. Let the same be filed within four weeks. List
thereafter.
However, it is made clear that if replies are not filed on or
before the next date of hearing, then the right to file the same
shall stand closed without further reference to this Court.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 29, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Rakesh Sharma and others vs. Bhushan Lal and
others a/w connected matter
RFA No.272 of 2003 a/w
.
RFA No.276 of 2003
28.05.2025 Present: Mr. Tara Singh Chauhan and Mr. Anup Rattan, Senior
Advocates with Mr. Surya Chauhan, Advocate, for the
appellants, in RFA No.272 of 2003 and for respondent
No.5 in RFA No.276 of 2003.
Mr. Sahil Dixit, Advocate, for the appellants in RFA No.276
of 2003 and for respondents No.2(a) to 2(c) in RFA No.272
of 2003.
Mr. K.D. Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rahul Gathania,
Advocate, for respondent No.1, in both the appeals.
None for respondent No.4 in RFA No.276 of 2003.
Respondent No.3 in RFA No.272 of 2003 is exparte.
Mr. Anup Rattan, learned Senior Advocate has also put in
appearance on behalf of the appellants and prays that the matter
be listed after ensuing summer vacation in order to enable him to
prepare the case at hand.
In view thereof, list the matter on 21.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 28, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Parul vs. Himanshu Verma
CMPMO No.120 of 2025
28.05.2025 Present: Mr. Vivek Singh Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
.
Mr. Arjun Lal and Mr. Akash Thakur, Advocates, for the
respondent.
Parties are not averse to make an endeavour to settle the
matter amicably.
At the joint request of learned counsel for the parties,
Mr. S.C. Chauhan, learned Advocate and a trained Mediator is
appointed as a Mediator to mediate between the parties. The
parties shall appear before him on 31.05.2025 at 11:00 a.m. in
the Bar Room of District Courts at Hamirpur, Himachal Pradesh.
List after receipt of the report of learned Mediator which
should positively be filed in the Court within 120 days from
31.05.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 28, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
State of HP vs. Balbir Singh and others
RSA No.155 of 2022
28.05.2025 Present: Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
.
the appellant/ State.
Mr. Sunny Modgil, Advocate, for respondents No.1, 2, 3(i)
to 3(v), 4(i) to 4(viii), 5 to 7, 8(iv), 9, 10(i) to 10(iii), 11(i) to
11(iv), 12(a) to 12(e), 13(i) to 13(iii), 14, 15, 16(i), 16(iii),
17, 19 and 20, through video conferencing.
CMP No.11883 of 2025
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicants. The non-applicants have no objection, if in case, the
application is allowed and permission is granted for deletion of name
of respondent No.4(i), i.e., Smt. Vimla Devi.
I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the
pleadings. Respondent No.4(i), i.e., Smt. Vimla Devi is stated to
have died on 28.02.2025.
From perusal of the application, it is evident that legal heirs of
deceased respondent No.4(i)- Smt. Vimla Devi are already on
record as respondents No. 4(ii) to 4(viii).
In view thereof, present application is allowed. Name of
respondent No.4(i) is ordered to be deleted from the array of the
respondents, subject to just all exceptions.
The application stands disposed of. Amended memo of
parties filed at Page-184 is ordered to be taken on record.
RSA No.155 of 2022
Let steps for the service of respondents No.8(ii), 16(ii) and
proforma respondents No.21 to 25 be taken within two weeks. On
taking such steps, issue notice to the said respondents, returnable
within four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 28, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Punjab State Electricity Board vs. Kuldeep Singh and
others
CMPMO No.101 of 2021
.
28.05.2025 Present: Mr. Anand Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Karan
Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Sanket Sankhyan, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to
3.
Mr. Atul Jhingon, Advocate, for respondents No.5 & 6.
Name of resondent No.4 is deleted vide order dated
24.06.2022.
At the request of learned counsel appearing on behalf of
respondents No.1 to 3, list the matter on 25.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 28, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Kewal Krishan and others vs. Balwinder Singh and
others
CMPMO No.322 of 2020
.
28.05.2025 Present: Mr. Sunny Modgil, Advocate, for the petitioners, through
video conferencing.
Mr. Divya Raj Singh, Advocate, for the respondents.
The matter is being listed after November, 2020. In view
thereof, learned counsel for the parties seek time to ascertain the
status of their clients.
As prayed, list the matter on 24.06.2025..
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 28, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Lal Chand vs. Moti Ram and others
CMPMO No.153 of 2020
.
28.05.2025 Present: Mr. Maan Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Dibender Ghosh, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
CMP(M) No.268 of 2021
Though served, no one has put in appearance on behalf of
the legal heirs of deceased respondent No.2. The non-applicants
do not intend to file reply to the present application and have no
objection, if in case, the application is allowed.
I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused
the pleadings. Respondent No.2-Mani Ram is stated to have died
on 09.11.2020.
The same is evident from the Death Certificate appended
along with the present application as Annexure A-1. Deceased
respondent No.2 is survived by his legal heirs, details whereof,
have been given in Paragraph-1 of the present application.
Since the right to sue inheres/survives with the legal heirs
of deceased respondent No.2, details whereof, have been given
in Paragraph-1 of the present application, therefore, they are
ordered to be brought on record.
The application stands disposed of.
CMP(M) No.269 of 2021
Though served, no one has put in appearance on behalf of
the legal heirs of deceased respondent No.4. The non-applicants
do not intend to file reply to the present application and have no
objection, if in case, the application is allowed.
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused
the pleadings. Respondent No.4-Prem Chand is stated to have
.
died on 16.02.2020.
The same is evident from the Death Certificate appended
along with the present application as Annexure A-1. Deceased
respondent No.4 is survived by his legal heirs, details whereof,
have been given in Paragraph-1 of the present application.
Since the right to sue inheres/survives with the legal heirs
of deceased respondent No.4, details whereof, have been given
in Paragraph-1 of the present application, therefore, they are
ordered to be brought on record.
The application stands disposed of.
CMP(M) No.270 of 2021
Though served, no one has put in appearance on behalf of
the legal heirs of deceased respondent No.7. The non-applicants
do not intend to file reply to the present application and have no
objection, if in case, the application is allowed.
I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused
the pleadings. Respondent No.7-Smt. Lachhmu Devi is stated to
have died on 10.12.2018.
The same is evident from the Death Certificate appended
along with the present application as Annexure A-1. Deceased
respondent No.7 is survived by her legal heirs, details whereof,
have been given in Paragraph-1 of the present application.
Since the right to sue inheres/survives with the legal heirs
of deceased respondent No.7, details whereof, have been given
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
in Paragraph-1 of the present application, therefore, they are
ordered to be brought on record.
.
For the bona fide reasons stated/sufficient cause shown in
the application, delay in bringing on record the legal heirs of
deceased respondent No.7, is condoned and abatement, if any,
is set aside.
The application stands disposed of.
Amended memo of parties filed at Page-105 of the paper
book is ordered to be taken on record.
CMPMO No.153 of 2020
As jointly prayed, list after six weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 28, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Rattan Chand (deceased) through LRs. and others vs.
Hari Krishan Sharma
CMPMO No.127 of 2018
.
28.05.2025 Present: Mr. B.S. Attri, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Rajesh Kumar Sharma and Mr. Rajinder Thakur,
Advocates, for the respondent.
Parties jointly submit that proceedings before the trial
Court, from where the present petition arises, is pending
adjudication and presently the matter is listed for recording of
evidence of the plaintiff.
As jointly prayed, list after eight weeks.
It is made clear that mere pendency of this petition shall
not preclude the trial Court to proceed further in the matter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 28, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Munshi Ram vs. Sub Divisional Officer and others
CMPMO No.450 of 2017
.
28.05.2025 Present: None for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondents No.1 & 2/State.
Mr. Tarun K. Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
Ms Shalini Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.4.
another appropriate Bench.
r to
At the pleasure of Hon’ble the Chief Justice, list before
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 28, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Pawan Kumar and others vs. Kesari Lal (deceased)
thorough LRs. and another
CMPMO No.325 of 2016
.
28.05.2025 Present: Mr. Adarsh K. Vashista, Advocate, for the petitioners.
None for respondent Nos.1 to 5.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
The counsel representing respondents No.1 to 5 has died.
In view thereof, let Court notice be issued to respondents No.1 to
5, returnable within four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 28, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Leela Devi vs. State of HP and another
RSA No.356 of 2022
.
28.05.2025 Present: Mr. Varun Chauhan, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.1/State.
Mr. H.R. Jhingta, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
Further time prayed on behalf of learned counsel
appearing on behalf of the appellant to prepare the case at hand.
As prayed, list on 21.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 28, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Paras Ram (deceased) through LRs. vs. Shanti Devi
and another
RSA No.322 of 2022
.
28.05.2025 Present: Dr. Lalit K. Sharma, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Ashok Sharma, Senior Advocate with Ms. Anubhuti
Sharma, Advocate, for the respondents.
At the request of learned counsel for the appellants, list on
28.06.2025.
r ( Bipin C. Negi )
May 28, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Gurdial Singh vs. Piara Singh
RSA No.158 of 2014
.
28.05.2025 Present: Mr. P.P. Chauhan, Advocate, for the appellant.
Ms. Sanjivini Sood, Advocate, vice Mr. Arjun Lall,
Advocate, for the respondent, who is stated to have
expired.
Consequential steps for bringing on record the legal heirs
of deceased sole respondent be taken within four weeks. List
thereafter. r
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 28, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Mohinder Singh and others vs. Kashmiri Devi and
others
RSA No.273 of 2010
.
28.05.2025 Present: Mr. Vijay Panchta, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Pranjal Munjal, Advocate, vice Mr. Janesh Gupta,
Advocate, for respondents No.1, 3 to 6.
Ms. Neha Negi, Advocate vice Mr. Ajay Kumar Dhiman,
Advocate, for respondents No.5(a) to 5(d), respondent
No.7 and proposed LRs. of respondent No.8, except LR
No.8(c), namely Rakesh Chand.
Further time prayed for bringing on record the legal heirs
of deceased LR No.8(c). Let the needful be done within four
weeks. Steps for the service of respondents No.2(a) to 2(d) and
9(a) be taken within one week. On taking such steps, issue
notice to the said legal heir, returnable within four weeks.
Amended memo by stating correct parentage of proposed
LRs No.9(a) to 9(c) be also filed in the meanwhile. List after four
weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 28, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Chand @ Chander Singh vs. Tamar Dhawaj and others
RSA No.492 of 2009
.
28.05.2025 Present: Mr. Digvijay Singh Bisht, Advocate, vice Mr. B.C. Verma,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Rupam Chauhan, Advocate, vice Dr. Lalit K. Sharma,
Advocate, for the respondents.
From the report of learned Mediator, it is evident that the
matter was listed before learned Mediator on nine occasions.
However, the parties appeared only once before learned
Mediator. The parties seem to be disinterested in a mediation in
the case at hand.
In view thereof, list the matter for hearing in due course.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 28, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Ram Parkash and others vs. Rajinder Kumar and
others
RSA No.503 of 2000
.
28.05.2025 Present: Ms. Kusum Chaudhary, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. K.D. Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vivek Singh
Thakur, Advocate, for respondents No.1(a), 1(b), 2(a) to
2(d), 3, 4 and 14(a), 14(c) to 14(f).
Respondent No.14(b) is stated to have expired.
Let steps for bringing on record the legal heirs of deceased
respondent No.14(b) be taken within four weeks. List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 28, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Bishan Dass vs. State of HP
Cr.MP(M) No.1232 of 2025
.
28.05.2025 Present: Mr. Kapil Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Vijender Katoch,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
Notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate
General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the
respondent-State and seeks time to file status report.
List on 01.07.2025. Status report be filed on or before the
next date of hearing.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 28, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
M/s Shrishti Technologies vs. N. Balaram
CMPMO No.258 of 2025
.
28.05.2025 Present: Mr. Rajat Awasthy, Advocate, for the petitioner.
CMPMO No.258 of 2025 & CMP No.11987 of 2025
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the
respondent, returnable within four weeks.
In the meanwhile, operation and implementation of
impugned order dated 14.02.2025, passed by learned Senior Civil
Judge, Nalagarh, District Solan, H.P., shall remain stayed.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 28, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Sanjeev Maria vs. Narip Bajwa
CMPMO No.255 of 2025
.
28.05.2025 Present: Mr. P.S. Goverdhan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rakesh
Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
CMPMO No.255 of 2025 & CMP No.11714 of 2025
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the
respondent, returnable within four weeks.
In the meanwhile, further proceedings pending before
learned Senior Civil Judge, Shimla, District Shimla, in Civil Suit
No.36 of 2025, titled Narip Bajwa vs. Sanjeev Maria, shall remain
stayed.
CMP No.11715 of 2025
Allowed and the applicant is exempted from filing
translated copies of vernacular documents, in question, annexed
with the accompanying petition, at this stage, subject to filing of
the same within seven days, as and when directed to do so. The
application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 28, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Union of India and others vs. Varun and another
Arbitration Appeal No.146 of 2025
.
28.05.2025 Present: Ms. Kritika Verma, Advocate, vice Mr. Sumeet Raj
Sharma, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.2/State.
Arbitration Appeal No.146/2025
Notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate
General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of
respondent No.2. On taking steps within three days, issue notice
to respondent No.1, returnable within four weeks.
List thereafter.
OMP No.531 of 2025
For the reasons stated in the application, delay of 24 days
in re-filing the present appeal is condoned. The application
stands disposed of.
OMP No.530 of 2025
Since certified copies of the documents have already
been placed on record, therefore, the present application has
become infructuous. The same is disposed of accordingly.
OMP No.529 of 2025
The operation of the impugned judgment dated
05.11.2024, passed by learned Court below and also the Arbitral
Award dated 19.06.2023 is stayed subject to deposit of the entire
awarded amount along-with up-to-date interest within a period of
four weeks. The application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 28, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Union of India and others vs. Chhape Ram and another
Arbitration Appeal No.130 of 2025
.
28.05.2025 Present: Ms. Kritika Verma, Advocate, vice Mr. Sumeet Raj
Sharma, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.2/State.
Arbitration Appeal No.130/2025
Notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate
General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of
respondent No.2. On taking steps within three days, issue notice
to respondent No.1, returnable within four weeks.
List thereafter.
OMP No.480 of 2025
For the reasons stated in the application, delay of 30 days
in re-filing the present appeal is condoned. The application
stands disposed of.
OMP No.479 of 2025
Since certified copies of the documents have already
been placed on record, therefore, the present application has
become infructuous. The same is disposed of accordingly.
OMP No.478 of 2025
The operation of the impugned judgment dated
05.11.2024, passed by learned Court below and also the Arbitral
Award dated 19.06.2023 is stayed subject to deposit of the entire
awarded amount along-with up-to-date interest within a period of
four weeks. The application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 28, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Union of India and others vs. Ram Lal and another
Arbitration Appeal No.129 of 2025
.
28.05.2025 Present: Ms. Kritika Verma, Advocate, vice Mr. Sumeet Raj
Sharma, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.2/State.
Arbitration Appeal No.129/2025
Notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate
General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of
respondent No.2. On taking steps within three days, issue notice
to respondent No.1, returnable within four weeks.
List thereafter.
OMP No.477 of 2025
For the reasons stated in the application, delay of 23 days
in re-filing the present appeal is condoned. The application
stands disposed of.
OMP No.476 of 2025
Since certified copies of the documents have already
been placed on record, therefore, the present application has
become infructuous. The same is disposed of accordingly.
OMP No.475 of 2025
The operation of the impugned judgment dated
05.11.2024, passed by learned Court below and also the Arbitral
Award dated 19.06.2023 is stayed subject to deposit of the entire
awarded amount along-with up-to-date interest within a period of
four weeks. The application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 28, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Rakesh Sharma and others vs. Bhushan Lal and
others a/w connected matter
RFA No.272 of 2003 a/w
.
RFA No.276 of 2003
27.05.2025 Present: Mr. Tara Singh Chauhan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Surya
Chauhan, Advocate, for the appellants, in RFA No.272 of
2003 and for respondent No.5 in RFA No.276 of 2003.
Mr. Sahil Dixit, Advocate, for the appellants in RFA No.276
of 2003 and for respondents No.2(a) to 2(c) in RFA No.272
of 2003.
Mr. K.D. Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rahul Gathania,
Advocate, for respondent No.1, in both the appeals.
None for respondent No.4 in RFA No.276 of 2003.
Respondent No.3 in RFA No.272 of 2003 is exparte.
Heard in part. List for continuation on 28.05.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 27, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Rakesh Sharma and others vs. Bhushan Lal and
others a/w connected matter
RFA No.272 of 2003 a/w
.
RFA No.276 of 2003
27.05.2025 Present: Mr. Tara Singh Chauhan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Surya
Chauhan, Advocate, for the appellants, in RFA No.272 of
2003 and for respondent No.5 in RFA No.276 of 2003.
Mr. Sahil Dixit, Advocate, for the appellants in RFA No.276
of 2003 and for respondents No.2(a) to 2(c) in RFA No.272
of 2003.
Mr. K.D. Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rahul Gathania,
Advocate, for respondent No.1, in both the appeals.
None for respondent No.4 in RFA No.276 of 2003.
Respondent No.3 in RFA No.272 of 2003 is exparte.
Heard in part. List for continuation on 28.05.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 27, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Kashmir Singh vs. Sita Ram
RSA No.20 of 2024
.
27.05.2025 Present: Mr. Tek Chand, Advocate, vice Mr. Narender Kumar
Reddy, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Shubham Guleria, Advocate, for the respondent.
Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant
submits that the original counsel is unavailable today on account
of personal difficulty. He seeks an adjournment. Prayer allowed.
List on 05.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 27, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Besi Devi and another vs. Sohan Lal
CMPMO No.350 of 2023
.
27.05.2025 Present: Mr. Maan Singh, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Vivek Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Mukul Sood,
Advocate, for the respondent.
Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of the
respondent prays for an adjournment on account of non-
availability of the original counsel.
As prayed, list on 05.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 27, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Abdul Majeed vs. The Eicher Tractors Ltd. and another
RSA No.77 of 2023
.
27.05.2025 Present: Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Tarun Brakta,
Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Rajesh Mandhotra, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
Since the matter stands admitted vide order dated
r to
08.08.2024, therefore, list the same for hearing in due course.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 27, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Jodh Singh and another vs. Ramesh Chand and
another
RSA No.389 of 2022
.
27.05.2025 Present: Mr. Sumit Sood, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocate, for the respondents.
CMP No.18642 of 2024
Reply is stated to have been filed in the Registry today
thereafter.
r to
itself. Rejoinder thereto, if any, be filed within four weeks. List
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 27, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Dila Ram Verma vs. Mangat Ram (deceased) through
LRs.
CMPMO No.349 of 2022
.
27.05.2025 Present: Mr. H.C. Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocate, for respondents No.1(a) to
1(c).
At the request of learned counsel appearing on behalf of
the petitioner, list after four weeks.
r ( Bipin C. Negi )
May 27, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Khyalu Ram and another vs. Bhagat Ram and others
Civil Revision No.42 of 2021
.
27.05.2025 Present: Mr. Sanjeev Kuthiala, Senior Advocate with Mr. Abhishek,
Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. K.D. Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Het Ram,
Advocate, for the respondents.
Civil Suit inter se parties w.r.t. the suit property qua title is
pending adjudication before the Court of competent jurisdiction.
In terms of law laid down in Sanjay Kumar Pandey and others
vs. Gulbahar Sheikh and others, 2004(4) SCC 664, the remedy
of a person unsuccessful in a suit under Section 6 of the Specific
Relief Act, 1963 is to file a regular suit establishing his title to the
suit property. The remedy of filing a revision is available but that
is only by way of an exception.
In view thereof, present revision is admitted.
List for consideration in due course.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 27, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Rattan Lal and another vs. Asha Devi and another
CMPMO No.208 of 2020
.
27.05.2025 Present: Mr. J.L. Bhadwaj, Senior Advocate with Mr. S. Partha
Swami, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Pranjal Munjal, Advocate, vice Mr. Janesh Gupta,
Advocate, for the respondents.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners
submits that the impugned order, i.e., Annexure P-3, has been
passed by an authority, i.e., Sub Divisional Magistrate, Sadar,
District Bilaspur, H.P., which has not been designated in terms of
the provisions of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and
Senior Citizens Act, 2007.
Faced with the aforesaid, learned counsel appearing on
behalf of the respondents seeks time to ascertain as to whether
the said authority had been designated under the Act. List after
four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 27, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Anant Ram (deceased) through LRs. vs. Janak Raj
RSA No.135 of 2020
.
27.05.2025 Present: Mr. K.D. Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Het Ram,
Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Divya Raj Singh, Advocate, for the respondent.
Further time prayed on behalf of the parties to inspect the
record. List after six weeks.
May 27, 2025 (KS)
to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Sanjeev Suri and another vs. Promila Suri
RSA No.144 of 2020
.
27.05.2025 Present: Mr. Romesh Verma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sumit
Sharma, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Aishwary, Advocate, vice Mr. Naresh Sharma,
Advocate, for the respondent.
Learned counsel for the respondent has placed reliance
upon the decision of the Apex Court in Charan Singh vs. Ram
Saroop, SLP (C) D.No.59467/2024.
Faced with the aforesaid, learned counsel for the
appellants seeks time to go through the same.
List after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 27, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Gado Ram vs. Hemraj and others
RSA No.24 of 2020
.
27.05.2025 Present: Mr. Rajneesh K. Lal, Advocate, for the appellant.
Ms. Devyani Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Shivam
Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
None for respondents No.1, 2 and 4 to 7.
At the request of learned counsel for the appellant, list on
16.06.2025.
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
May 27, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Mangal Dass vs. Mehar Chand Mahajan Vidyawati
Chartitable Trust
CMPMO No.830 of 2019
.
27.05.2025 Present: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Tarun Brakta,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raman Sethi, Advocate, for the respondent.
The matter is being posted after November, 2021. In view
thereof, learned counsel seek time to ascertain the status of the
parties. List after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 27, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Devinder Kumar (deceased) through LRs. vs. Bharti
Chauhan and others
Civil Revision No.201 of 2017
.
27.05.2025 Present: Mr. Pawan K. Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Vivek Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.1 and
2(a).
Respondent No.2(b) proceeded against ex parte vide
order dated 04.04.2022.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents No.1
and 2(a) submits that his brief has been lost. He seeks time to
reconstruct the same.
Let the needful be done on or before the next date of
hearing. List on 26.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 27, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Kanwar Vijay Singh vs. Akshay Dogar and another
CMPMO No.435 of 2016
.
27.05.2025 Present: Mr. Y.P. Sood, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Akash Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. Arjun Lall, Advocate,
for respondent No.1.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.2/State.
At the request of learned vice counsel appearing on behalf
of respondent No.1, list after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 27, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Prem Chand vs. Kanta Devi
Civil Revision No.142 of 2022
.
27.05.2025 Present: Mr. Rajiv Rai, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Rishabh Negi, Advocate, vice Mr. Aman Parth Sharma,
Advocate, for the respondent.
Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of the
respondent seeks time to reconstruct the brief as he has lost his
brief. Prayer not opposed.
List for consideration on 19.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 27, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
M/s Hand Corner Stone LLP vs. Vasu Bhardwaj and
another
Civil Suit No.19 of 2025
.
23.05.2025 Present: Mr. Parvinder Singh, Mr. Ibadat S. Randhawa and
Mr. Ganesh Barowalia, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Mr. Adarsh K. Vashista and Mr. Shivom Vashista,
Advocates, for the defendants.
OMP No.339 of 2025
Heard learned counsel for the parties. Perused the
pleadings and the record.
The suit, in the case at hand, has been filed for specific
performance by the present applicant. Admittedly, in the case at
hand, the sale consideration is Rs.1 Crore 17 lacs, out which
Rs.48 lacs stands paid by the applicant to the non-applicants.
The sole contention raised on behalf of the non-applicants for
rejection of the present application seeking interim order is that
the applicant, in the case at hand, is a non-agriculturist and does
not have a specific permission under Section 118 of the Himachal
Pradesh Tenancy and Land Reforms Act, 1972 to buy property
within the State of Himachal Pradesh.
The contention raised by the present non-applicants is no
longer res integra in lieu of the law laid down by this Court in
Rahul Bhargava vs. Vinod Kohli and others, (2008) 1 SLC
385. The extract of the same reads as follows:-
“14. There is another aspect of the case, for filing a suit
for specific performance on the basis of agreement, no
permission is required, under Section 118 of the Act. It is
only if the suit is decreed such permission may be
required at the time of registration of the sale deed on the
basis of specific performance decree. In Manzoor Ahmed::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Magray vs. Ghulam Hassan Aram and others (1999) 7
SCC 703, the Hon’ble Apex Court has held as follows:
.
“It is to be stated that the appellant has neither
raised the said contention in the written statement nor
during the trial. However, in the appeal, the appellant
sought to raise the contention that the specificperformance qua the suit land cannot be granted as the
transfer or alienation of the suit property is prohibited
under the provisions of the J&K Agrarian Reforms Act,1972, the J&K Agrarian Reforms Act, 1976 and the J&K
Prohibition on Conservation of Lands and Alienation of
Orchards Act, 1975. The Court declined to entertain the
plea on the ground that it was raised almost 24 yearsafter the filing of the suit by the plaintiff and the same, if
permitted to be raised, would prejudice the rights of the
plaintiff. Even considering that the said plea is a pure
question of law, in our view, it is without any substance.
The definition under Section 2(4) of the J&K AgrarianReforms Act, 1972 specifically excludes “land” which was
an orchard on the first day of September 1971.
Subsection (5) of Section 2 defines “orchard” to mean acompact area of land having fruit trees grown thereon or
devoted to cultivation of fruit trees in such number that
the main use to which the land is put is growing of fruits
or fruit trees. In the present case, agreement to sell wasexecuted on 14.7.1971 in respect of an orchard land.
Therefore, the said Act was not applicable to the land in
dispute. Similar provisions are there in the Agrarian
Reforms Act, 1976 which gives the definition of the word
“land” under Section 2(9) and definition of the word
“orchard” under Section 2(10). From the said definition, it
is apparent that orchard is excluded from the operation of
the Agrarian Reforms Act. Learned counsel for the
appellant, however, further referred to Section 3 of the
J&K Prohibition on Conversion of Land and Alienation of
Orchards Act, 1975 which is as under:
“3. Prohibition on conversion of land and
alienation of orchards. (1) Notwithstanding anything
contained in any other law for the time being in force (a)
no person shall alienate an orchard except with the
previous permission of the Revenue Minister or such::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
officer as may be authorized by him in this behalf;
Provided that alienation of orchards to the extent of four
.
kanals only in favour of one or more persons for
residential purposes shall not need any permission.
(b) …. …. …. Considering the aforesaid section, it
is apparent that prohibition on transfer of orchards is not
absolute and the question of obtaining previous
permission as contemplated under Section 3(1)(a) would
arise at the time of execution of the sale deed on the
basis of decree for specific performance. Section 3 does
not bar the maintainability of the suit and permission can
be obtained by filing proper application after the decree is
passed. Therefore, it cannot be stated that decree for
specific performance is not required to be passed.
Further, under Section 3 of the J&K Prohibition on
Conservation of Land and Alienation of Orchards Act,
1975, prohibition on transfer is limited. Firstly, the proviso
makes it clear that alienation of orchards to the extent of
four kanals only in favour of one or more persons for
residential purposes will not require any permission.
Secondly, for more than four kanals of land, previous
permission of the Revenue Minister or such officer as
may be authorized by him in this behalf is required to be
obtained. Dealing with similar contention, this Court in
Bai Dosabai v. Mathurdas Govinddas [1980 (3) SCC
545 ] observed that even if the Act prohibits alienation of
land, if the decree is passed in favour of the plaintiff, it is
required to be moulded suitably.”
15. On the point of alienation/ transfer of land after
permission Section 3 of J&K Act noticed above and
Section 118 of the Act in substance are similar. There is
no absolute prohibition, under Section 118 of the Act on
transfer of land to nonagriculturist and transfer can be
made in favour of nonagriculturist with permission of
Government under Section 118 of the Act. This question
at the most will arise at the time of execution of sale deed
on the basis of decree for specific performance. Section
118 of the Act does not bar the maintainability of the suit
for specific performance and injunction on the basis of
agreement. The respondent No.1 had earlier obtained
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
permission from the State Government for purchasing the
property vide permission Ex. PW 3/A.
.
16. It has been submitted that learned District Judge has
passed the decree in infinity by ordering that the
appellant (defendant No.1) would execute the sale deed
in respect of the suit property in favour of respondent
No.1 within one month of the renewal of the permission,
under Section 118 of the Act. The execution of decree of
specific performance is also governed by law of
Limitation and, therefore, the plea of learned counsel for
the appellant that learned District Judge has passed
decree in infinity is not tenable. The learned District
Judge has rightly appreciated the material on record. No
case for interference has been made out. The substantial
questions of law No. 1 to 3 are decided against the
appellant and in favour of respondents No.1 and 2. The
impugned judgement, decree do not require any
interference.”
In the suit for specific performance what is sought to be
specifically enforced at is the Agreement dated 17.12.2022
entered into by the parties. Clause 11 thereof, which speaks of
specific performance, reads as follows:-
“11. That if the sellers backs out from this agreement in
that event the purchaser shall be entitled to enforce this
agreement through the process of law by way of specific
performance of the agreement and/or the seller shall be
liable to pay double of the received money to the
purchase. The option shall be that of the purchaser.”
In view of above, during the pendency of the suit, the non
applicants, their agent, representatives are restrained from
encumbering, alienating, transferring, creating third party interest
over the suit property.
The application stands disposed of.
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
.
Civil Suit No.19 of 2025
List for admission and denial before the Registrar
concerned, on 23.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 23, 2025 (KS) Judge
r to
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
M/s Hand Corner Stone LLP vs. Sankalp Gupta and
others
Civil Suit No.18 of 2025
.
23.05.2025 Present: Mr. Parvinder Singh, Mr. Ibadat S. Randhawa and
Mr. Ganesh Barowalia, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Mr. Adarsh K. Vashista and Mr. Shivom Vashista,
Advocates, for the respondents.
OMP No.337 of 2025
Heard learned counsel for the parties. Perused the
pleadings and the record.
The suit, in the case at hand, has been filed for specific
performance by the present applicant. Admittedly, in the case at
hand, 85% of the sale consideration stands paid by the applicant
to the non-applicants. The sole contention raised on behalf of the
non-applicants for rejection of the present application seeking
interim order is that the applicant, in the case at hand, is a non-
agriculturist and does not has a specific permission under Section
118 of the Himachal Pradesh Tenancy and Land Reforms Act,
1972 to buy property within the State of Himachal Pradesh.
The contention raised by the present non-applicants is no
longer res integra in lieu of the law laid down by this Court in
Rahul Bhargava vs. Vinod Kohli and others, (2008) 1 SLC
385. The extract of the same reads as follows:-
“14. There is another aspect of the case, for filing a suit
for specific performance on the basis of agreement, no
permission is required, under Section 118 of the Act. It is
only if the suit is decreed such permission may be
required at the time of registration of the sale deed on the
basis of specific performance decree. In Manzoor Ahmed::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Magray vs. Ghulam Hassan Aram and others (1999) 7
SCC 703, the Hon’ble Apex Court has held as follows:
“It is to be stated that the appellant has neither
.
raised the said contention in the written statement nor
during the trial. However, in the appeal, the appellant
sought to raise the contention that the specific
performance qua the suit land cannot be granted as thetransfer or alienation of the suit property is prohibited
under the provisions of the J&K Agrarian Reforms Act,
1972, the J&K Agrarian Reforms Act, 1976 and the J&KProhibition on Conservation of Lands and Alienation of
Orchards Act, 1975. The Court declined to entertain the
plea on the ground that it was raised almost 24 years
after the filing of the suit by the plaintiff and the same, ifpermitted to be raised, would prejudice the rights of the
plaintiff. Even considering that the said plea is a pure
question of law, in our view, it is without any substance.
The definition under Section 2(4) of the J&K Agrarian
Reforms Act, 1972 specifically excludes “land” which wasan orchard on the first day of September 1971.
Subsection (5) of Section 2 defines “orchard” to mean a
compact area of land having fruit trees grown thereon ordevoted to cultivation of fruit trees in such number that
the main use to which the land is put is growing of fruits
or fruit trees. In the present case, agreement to sell was
executed on 14.7.1971 in respect of an orchard land.
Therefore, the said Act was not applicable to the land in
dispute. Similar provisions are there in the Agrarian
Reforms Act, 1976 which gives the definition of the word
“land” under Section 2(9) and definition of the word
“orchard” under Section 2(10). From the said definition, it
is apparent that orchard is excluded from the operation of
the Agrarian Reforms Act. Learned counsel for the
appellant, however, further referred to Section 3 of the
J&K Prohibition on Conversion of Land and Alienation of
Orchards Act, 1975 which is as under:
“3. Prohibition on conversion of land and
alienation of orchards. (1) Notwithstanding anything
contained in any other law for the time being in force (a)
no person shall alienate an orchard except with the
previous permission of the Revenue Minister or such::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
officer as may be authorized by him in this behalf;
Provided that alienation of orchards to the extent of four
kanals only in favour of one or more persons for.
residential purposes shall not need any permission.
(b) …. …. …. Considering the aforesaid section, it
is apparent that prohibition on transfer of orchards is not
absolute and the question of obtaining previouspermission as contemplated under Section 3(1)(a) would
arise at the time of execution of the sale deed on the
basis of decree for specific performance. Section 3 doesnot bar the maintainability of the suit and permission can
be obtained by filing proper application after the decree is
passed. Therefore, it cannot be stated that decree for
specific performance is not required to be passed.
Further, under Section 3 of the J&K Prohibition on
Conservation of Land and Alienation of Orchards Act,
1975, prohibition on transfer is limited. Firstly, the proviso
makes it clear that alienation of orchards to the extent of
four kanals only in favour of one or more persons for
residential purposes will not require any permission.
Secondly, for more than four kanals of land, previous
permission of the Revenue Minister or such officer as
may be authorized by him in this behalf is required to be
obtained. Dealing with similar contention, this Court in
Bai Dosabai v. Mathurdas Govinddas [1980 (3) SCC
545 ] observed that even if the Act prohibits alienation of
land, if the decree is passed in favour of the plaintiff, it is
required to be moulded suitably.”
15. On the point of alienation/ transfer of land after
permission Section 3 of J&K Act noticed above and
Section 118 of the Act in substance are similar. There is
no absolute prohibition, under Section 118 of the Act on
transfer of land to nonagriculturist and transfer can be
made in favour of nonagriculturist with permission of
Government under Section 118 of the Act. This question
at the most will arise at the time of execution of sale deed
on the basis of decree for specific performance. Section
118 of the Act does not bar the maintainability of the suit
for specific performance and injunction on the basis of
agreement. The respondent No.1 had earlier obtained
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
permission from the State Government for purchasing the
.
property vide permission Ex. PW 3/A.
16. It has been submitted that learned District Judge has
passed the decree in infinity by ordering that the
appellant (defendant No.1) would execute the sale deed
in respect of the suit property in favour of respondent
No.1 within one month of the renewal of the permission,
under Section 118 of the Act. The execution of decree of
specific performance is also governed by law of
Limitation and, therefore, the plea of learned counsel for
the appellant that learned District Judge has passed
decree in infinity is not tenable. The learned District
Judge has rightly appreciated the material on record. No
case for interference has been made out. The substantial
questions of law No. 1 to 3 are decided against the
appellant and in favour of respondents No.1 and 2. The
impugned judgement, decree do not require any
interference.”
In the suit for specific performance what is sought to be
specifically enforced is the Agreement dated 23.04.2023 entered
into between the parties. Clause 11 thereof, which speaks of
specific performance, reads as follows:-
“11. That if the sellers backs out from the agreement in
that event the purchaser shall be entitled to enforce this
agreement through the process of law by way of specific
performance of the agreement.”
In view of above, during the pendency of the suit, the non
applicants, their agent, representatives are restrained from
encumbering, alienating, transferring, creating third party interest
over the suit property.
The application stands disposed of.
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Civil Suit No.18 of 2025
.
List for admission and denial before the Registrar
concerned, on 23.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 23, 2025 (KS) Judge
r to
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
State of HP and another vs. Anil Kumar
CMP(M) No.410 of 2025
.
23.05.2025 Present: Mr. R.P. Singh, Deputy Advocate General, for the
applicants/State.
Mr. Rishi Tandon, Advocate, for the respondent.
At the request of learned Deputy Advocate General, list on
27.05.2025.
r ( Bipin C. Negi )
May 23, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Balwant Singh vs. National Highway Authority of India
and another
Arbitration Case No.143 of 2025
.
23.05.2025 Present: Mr. Ashok K. Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. G.R. Palsra,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms. Sneh Bhimta, Advocate, vice Ms. Shreya Chauhan,
Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. R.P. Singh, Deputy Advocate General, for respondent
No.2/State.
r to
Notice. Ms. Sneh Bhimta, learned counsel and Mr. R.P.
Singh, learned Deputy Advocate General, appear and waive
service of notice on behalf of respondent No.1 and respondent
No.2, respectively and seek time to file reply.
Reply be filed within four weeks. Rejoinder thereto be filed
within another four weeks. List after eight weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 23, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Surender Singh vs. Land Acquisition Officer
and another
Arbitration Case No.144 of 2025
.
23.05.2025 Present: Mr. Ashok K. Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. G.R. Palsra,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. R.P. Singh, Deputy Advocate General, for respondent
No.1/State.
Ms. Sneh Bhimta, Advocate, vice Ms. Shreya Chauhan,
Advocate, for respondent No.2.
r to
Notice. Mr. R.P. Singh, learned Deputy Advocate General
and Ms. Sneh Bhimta, learned counsel, appear and waive service
of notice on behalf of respondent No.1 and respondent No.2,
respectively and seek time to file reply.
Reply be filed within four weeks. Rejoinder thereto be filed
within another four weeks. List after eight weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 23, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Surender Singh vs. Land Acquisition Officer
and another
Arbitration Case No.145 of 2025
.
23.05.2025 Present: Mr. Ashok K. Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. G.R. Palsra,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. R.P. Singh, Deputy Advocate General, for respondent
No.1/State.
Ms. Sneh Bhimta, Advocate, vice Ms. Shreya Chauhan,
Advocate, for respondent No.2.
r to
Notice. Mr. R.P. Singh, learned Deputy Advocate General
and Ms. Sneh Bhimta, learned counsel, appear and waive service
of notice on behalf of respondent No.1 and respondent No.2,
respectively and seek time to file reply.
Reply be filed within four weeks. Rejoinder thereto be filed
within another four weeks. List after eight weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 23, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Goverdhan and others vs. Land Acquisition Officer
and another
Arbitration Case No.142 of 2025
.
23.05.2025 Present: Mr. Ashok K. Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. R.P. Singh, Deputy Advocate General, for respondent
No.1/State.
Ms. Sneh Bhimta, Advocate, vice Ms. Shreya Chauhan,
Advocate, for respondent No.2.
Notice. Mr. R.P. Singh, learned Deputy Advocate General
and Ms. Sneh Bhimta, learned counsel, appear and waive service
of notice on behalf of respondent No.1 and respondent No.2,
respectively and seek time to file reply.
Reply be filed within four weeks. Rejoinder thereto be filed
within another four weeks. List after eight weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 23, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Ravinder Kumar Sharma vs. Ramesh Kumar Soni
Civil Suit No.2 of 2025
.
23.05.2025 Present: Mr. Parav Sharma, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Mr. Rajesh Mandhotra, Advocate, for the defendant.
Civil Suit No.2 of 2025 & OMP No.9 of 2025
Written statement and reply be filed within three weeks.
List thereafter.
r ( Bipin C. Negi )
May 23, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Mohinder Singh vs. Milap Chand and others
CMP(M) No.339 of 2024
.
23.05.2025 Present: Ms. Ankita, Advocate, vice Mr. Saurabh Ahluwalia,
Advocate, for the applicant.
None for respondents No.1 to 4.
Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant
submits that the original counsel is unavailable today on account
of personal difficulty. She seeks an adjournment. Prayer allowed.
List after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 23, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Shri Shri Mahalaxmi Trust (Registered) Chamunda
Devi vs. Balbir Singh and others
Civil Suit No.39 of 2024
.
23.05.2025 Present: Mr. Karan Singh Kanwar, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Ms. Retta Hingmang, Advocate, for defendant No.1.
Mr. K.D.Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vivek Singh
Thakur, Advocate, for defendants No.2 and 3.
Civil Suit No.39 of 2024
Replication, if any, be filed within four weeks.
r List
thereafter.
CMP No.440 of 2024
Rejoinder, if any, be filed on or before he next date of
hearing.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 23, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Narinder Kumar and another vs. Rikhi Ram and others
CMP No.13179 of 2023
.
23.05.2025 Present: Mr. K.D. Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vivek Singh
Thakur, Advocate, for the applicants.
Mr. M.L. Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.1(a) to
1(c), 3(a) to 3(c), 4, 5 & 7(a) to 7(c).
CMP No.2518 of 2024
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
application is allowed.
r to
applicants. The non-applicants have no objection, if in case, the
I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused
the pleadings. Respondent No.6-Smt. Savitri Devi is stated to
have died on 17.11.2019.
From perusal of the application, it is evident that legal heirs
of deceased respondent No.6-Smt. Savitri Devi are already on
record as respondents No.3(a) to 3(c), 4 and 5.
In view thereof, present application is allowed. Name of
respondent No.6-Smt. Savitri Devi is ordered to be deleted from
the array of the respondents, subject to just all exceptions.
The application stands disposed of. Amended memo be filed
on or before the next date of hearing.
CMP No.13179 of 2023
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicants
submits that an application for bringing on record the legal heirs
of deceased respondent No.2 has been prepared and sent to the
applicants for signatures and attestation thereupon. Though, the
said application had been received by the parties, however, it was
returned without having been duly signed. It is on account of the
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
same that learned counsel for the applicants could not file the
.
application within time. He seeks and is granted two weeks’ time
to do the needful. List thereafter.
In the meanwhile, steps for service of respondents No.8 to
11 be also taken.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 23, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Municipal Corporation Shimla vs. Rajinder Prasad
Jinda
CMPMO No.689 of 2023
.
23.05.2025 Present: Mr. Mukul Sood, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Further time prayed for bringing on record the legal heirs
of deceased respondent.
Let the needful be done within four weeks. List thereafter.
May 23, 2025 (KS)
to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Jaram Singh @ Jarmo vs. Harishwar and others
RSA No.240 of 2022
.
23.05.2025 Present: Mr. R.L. Chaudhary, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Arun Kaushal, Advocate, for the respondents.
CMP No.147 of 2023
The present application has been filed under Order 41
Rule 27 read with Section 151 of the Civil Procedure Code for
production of additional evidence. The same has to be heard
along with the main appeal at the stage of final hearing.
Pleadings be completed in the meanwhile.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 23, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
GM Northern Railway vs. Bachitter Singh and others
CMP(M) No.170 of 2022
.
23.05.2025 Present: Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Senior Panel Counsel, for the
applicant/appellant.
Mr. Gurinder Singh Parmar, Advocate, for respondents
No.1(b) & 1(c).
None for respondent No.2.
Mr. R.P. Singh, Deputy Advocate General, for respondent
No.3/State.
CMP No.11267 of 2025
Allowed and the applicant is exempted from filing the
English translated copies of the documents, in question, annexed
with the accompanying appeal, at this stage, subject to filing of
the same within seven days, as and when directed to do so. The
application stands disposed of.
CMP (M) No.399 & 400 of 2025
Since CMP(M) Nos.762 & 763 of 2025 have been filed
claiming the same relief, as is being claimed in the present
applications, therefore, the said applications are dismissed as
not pressed.
CMP(M) Nos.762 & 763 of 2025
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the legal
heirs of deceased respondent No.1(a), i.e., Ramesh Chand,
details whereof, have been given in Paragraph-1 of the
application (CMP(M) No.762 of 2025), returnable within four
weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 23, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Shamsher Singh vs. Vijay Kumar
RSA No.254 of 2020
.
23.05.2025 Present: Mr. R.K. Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Arun Kumar,
Advocate, for the proposed LRs. of deceased appellant.
Mr. Pranjal Munjal, Advocate, vice Mr. Janesh Gupta,
Advocate, for the respondent.
CMP(M) No.718 & 719 of 2025
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicant. The non applicant has no objection, if in case, the
applications are allowed and the legal heirs of deceased
appellant, are brought on record as is being sought in the
application (CMP(M) No.718 of 2025).
The appellant is stated to have expired on 26.11.2024.
The same is evident form the Death Certificate appended along-
with the application (CMP(M) No.718 of 2025) as Annexure A-I.
The details of the legal heirs are given in Paragraph-2 of the
application (CMP(M) No.718 of 2025). However, it has been
stated in the application that the property of the deceased, by way
of family settlement, has devolved upon his three sons only,
mentioned in Paragraph-3 of the application (CMP(M) No.718 of
2025).
Since the right to sue inheres/survives in three legal heirs
of deceased appellant, detailed in Paragraph-3 of the application
(CMP(M) No.718 of 2025), therefore, they are ordered to be
brought on record.
For the bona fide reasons stated/sufficient cause shown in
the application (CMP(M) No.719 of 2025), delay in bringing on
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
record the legal heirs of deceased appellant, is condoned and
.
abatement, if any, is set aside.
The applications stand disposed of. Amended memo of
parties filed with the applications is ordered to be taken on record.
Power of attorney on behalf of the newly added appellants
stands already filed.
May 23, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Naval Kishore vs. Pardeep Kumar
CMPMO No.156 of 2019
.
23.05.2025 Present: Mr. Pawan Gautam, Advocate, vice Mr. Ashok Kumar
Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner
submits that the original counsel is unavailable today on account
of personal difficulty. He seeks an adjournment.
As prayed, list on 02.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 23, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
M/s Janta Cloth House and Anr. vs. Rakesh Kapoor &
Ors.
Civil Revision No.48 of 2019
.
23.05.2025 Present: Mr. Ashok Kumar Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rajat,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms. Swati Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Vivek Sharma,
Advocate, for the respondents/ applicants in CMP
No.14149 of 2024.
CMP No.14149 of 2024
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the non-applicant/
petitioner on instructions received from the petitioner submits that
petitioner would be ready and willing to pay use and occupation
charges at the rate of Rs.7,500/- per month.
Faced with the aforesaid, learned counsel for the applicant
seeks time to have instructions in this regard and to file rejoinder
to the present application.
Let the needful be done within four weeks. List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 23, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Gulab Singh and others vs. Geetan Devi (deceased)
through LR. Yog Raj
RSA No.499 of 2011
.
23.05.2025 Present: Mr. Tek Chand, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Jia Lal, Advocate, vice Mr. G.R. Palsra, Advocate, for
respondents No.1(a) and 1(b).
CMP No.10830 of 2025
No ground for early hearing of the matter is made out, at
this stage. Accordingly, application is dismissed.
RSA No.499 of 2011
List for hearing in due course.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 23, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Pamplu Devi vs. Sevati Devi and another
RSA No.239 of 2009
.
23.05.2025 Present: Ms Swati Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Respondent No.1 is stated to have expired.
Mr. Digvijay Singh Bisht, Advocate, vice Mr. B.C. Verma,
Advocate, for respondent No.2(a).
Further time prayed for removing objections in the
application filed in the Registry for bringing on record the legal
heirs of deceased respondent No.1.
Let the needful be done within one week. List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 23, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Satpal Rattan vs. Vijay Laxmi and another
CMPMO No.248 of 2025
.
23.05.2025 Present: Mr. Gaurav Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks time to place on
record the entire zimini orders of the trial Court.
Let the needful be done on or before the next date of
hearing.
List on 30.05.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 23, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Bidhi Chand (deceased) through LRs. and others vs.
Kanta Devi (deceased) through LR and others
RSA No.101 of 2025
.
23.05.2025 Present: Mr. Gurinder Singh, Advocate, for the appellants.
RSA No.101 of 2025 & CMP No.11565 of 2025
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the
respondents, returnable within four weeks. Notice has been
the paper book.
r to
issued on substantial question of law No.6 framed at Page-21 of
In the meanwhile, operation and execution of judgment
dated 28.02.2025, passed by learned Additional District Judge-I,
Una, District Una, Himachal Pradesh, in Civil Appeal No.51 of
2009, shall remain stayed.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 23, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Bidhi Chand (deceased) through LRs. and others vs.
Bhagwan Dass (deceased) through LRs. and others
RSA No.100 of 2025
.
23.05.2025 Present: Mr. Gurinder Singh, Advocate, for the appellants.
RSA No.100 of 2025 & CMP No.11556 of 2025
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the
respondents, returnable within four weeks. Notice has been
the paper book.
r to
issued on substantial question of law No.6 framed at Page-21 of
In the meanwhile, operation and execution of judgment
dated 28.02.2025, passed by learned Additional District Judge-I,
Una, District Una, Himachal Pradesh, in Civil Appeal No.61 of
2009, shall remain stayed.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 23, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Bidhi Chand (deceased) through LRs. And others vs.
Hardyal Singh and others
RSA No.99 of 2025
.
23.05.2025 Present: Mr. Gurinder Singh, Advocate, for the appellants.
RSA No.99 of 2025 & CMP No.11552 of 2025
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the
respondents, returnable within four weeks. Notice has been
the paper book.
r to
issued on substantial question of law No.6 framed at Page-21 of
In the meanwhile, operation and execution of judgment
dated 28.02.2025, passed by learned Additional District Judge-I,
Una, Ditrict Una, Himachal Pradesh, in Civil Appeal No.50 of
2009, shall remain stayed.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 23, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Hem Raj vs. Maan Singh
RSA No.66 of 2025
.
23.05.2025 Present: Mr. Prashant Chauhan, Advocate, vice Mr. Abhishek
Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
At the request of learned vice counsel appearing on behalf
of the appellant, list after two weeks.
May 23, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
State of HP vs. Govind Ram (deceased) through LRs
and others
RSA No.46 of 2025
.
22.05.2025 Present: Mr. Manish Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for the
appellant/State.
Mr. Rakesh Thakur, Advocate, for the respondents.
Learned Deputy Advocate General submits that he has not
prepared the case as in the cause list the matter could not be
marked. He prays for an adjournment. Prayer not opposed.
List after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 22, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
State of HP vs. Govind Ram (deceased) through LRs
and others
RSA No.46 of 2025
.
22.05.2025 Present: Mr. Manish Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for the
appellant/State.
Mr. Rakesh Thakur, Advocate, for the respondents.
Learned Deputy Advocate General submits that he has not
prepared the case as in the cause list the mater could not be
marked. He prays for an adjournment. Prayer not opposed.
List after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 22, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Shiv Ram vs. Kala Devi and another
RSA No.35 of 2025
.
22.05.2025 Present: Mr. Romesh Verma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sumit
Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Tejasvi Verma and Mr. Kiran Chauhan, Advocates, for
respondent No.1.
CMP No.3616 of 2025 Reply, as prayed, be filed within four weeks. List thereafter. r ( Bipin C. Negi ) May 22, 2025 (KS) Judge ::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Vipan Kumar vs. Rakesh Kumar and others
RSA No.2 of 2025
.
22.05.2025 Present: Mr. Surinder Saklani, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Manish Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for
respondents No.2 to 4/State.
Respondent No.1, though served, no one has put in
appearance on his behalf. Hence, he is proceeded against ex
parte.
Records of both the Courts below be called for.
List after record is received.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 22, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Ashok Kumar vs. Urmila Devi (deceased) through LRs.
CMPMO No.284 of 2024
.
22.05.2025 Present: Mr. Bhupinder Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Harshit
Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms. Anjali Soni Verma, Advocate, for respondents No.1(a)
and 1(b).
At the request of learned counsel appearing on behalf of
the respondents, who seeks time to prepare the case, list after
four weeks. r
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 22, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Tara Devi vs. Vikas Sharma and another
RSA No.243 of 2024
.
22.05.2025 Present: Mr. Rakesh Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Parveen Chauhan, Advocate, vice Mr. Sanjay Prashar,
Advocate, for respondent No.1.
None for respondent No.2.
CMP No.5779 of 2025
Further time prayed for filing reply.
done within four weeks. L:ist thereafter.
r Let the needful be
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 22, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Chamaroo (deceased) through LR and another vs. Om
Chand
RSA No.172 of 2024
.
22.05.2025 Present: Mr. Jagan Nath, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Ajay Chandel, Advocate, for the respondent.
Record stands received.
Learned counsel for the parties intend to go through the
same.
List after six weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 22, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Pamo Devi and others vs. Kishan Chand and another
RSA No.118 of 2024
.
22.05.2025 Present: Mr. Devender Kumar, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Bhupinder Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Harshit
Sharma, Advocate, for the respondents.
Further time prayed by learned counsel appearing on
behalf of the appellants to prepare the case. List after four
weeks.
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
May 22, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Rajesh vs. Babu Ram (deceased) through LRs.
Civil Revision No.118 of 2024
.
22.05.2025 Present: Mr. Parveen Chauhan, Advocate, vice Mr. Y.P. Sood,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Jagmohan Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Yash Pal
Sharma, Advocate, for the respondents.
Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of the
respondents submits that learned arguing counsel has met with
an accident. He seeks an adjournment. Prayer not opposed.
As prayed, list after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 22, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Khalil and others vs. Jafar (deceased) through LRs.
and others
CMPMO No.388 of 2016
.
22.05.2025 Present: Mr. Desh Raj Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Sahil Dixit, Advocate, for respondents No.1(a) to 1(e).
None for remaining respondents.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents
submits that learned Senior arguing counsel is unavailable today
on account of personal difficulty. He seeks an adjournment.
Prayer not opposed.
As prayed, list on 18.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 22, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Kasturi Devi (deceased) through LRs. and another
vs. Rajeev Sharma and others
Civil Revision No.193 of 2015
.
22.05.2025 Present: Mr. G.C. Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Deepak Gupta,
Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Sumit Sood, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Ajeet Pal Singh Jaswal, Advocate, for respondents
No.2 and 3.
CMP No.23738 of 2024
As jointly prayed, list on 26.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 22, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Dharam Chand Sood and another vs. Gopal Sood and
others
Civil Suit No.22 of 2055
.
22.05.2025 Present: Mr. Parveen Chauhan, Advocate, vice Mr. Y.P. Sood,
Advocate, for the plaintiffs.
Civil Suit No.22 of 2025 & OMP No.640 of 2025
On taking steps within three days, let notice be issued to
the respondents, returnable for 19.06.2025.
r ( Bipin C. Negi )
May 22, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Ganesh Kumar and another vs. Padeep Kumar
Civil Revision No.1 of 2022
.
22.05.2025 Present: Mr. Gurinder Singh Parmar, Advocate, for the petitioners.
CMP No.11056 of 2025
Learned counsel for the applicant/petitioner submits that
the sole respondent is presently residing at the address given in
the cause title.
In view thereof, let steps for the service of respondent be
taken within two days. On taking such steps, issue notice to the
said respondent, returnable within four weeks.
The application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 22, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Jagdev Chand and another vs. State of HP and others
Execution Petition No.437 of 2025
.
22.05.2025 Present: Mr. Mohit Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondents No.1 to 4/State.
Ms. Komal Chaudhary, Advocate, for respondent No.5.
Notice. Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, learned Additional
Advocate General and Ms. Komal Chaudhary, learned counsel,
appear and waive service of notice on behalf of respondents No.1
to 4 and respondent No.5, respectively and seek time to file
reply/instructions.
Reply/instructions be filed/obtained on or before the next
date of hearing. List on 23.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 22, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Amita Sood vs. Harmesh Kumar and others
RSA No.166 of 2023
.
22.05.2025 Present: Mr. Adarsh K. Vashista and Mr. Shivom Vashista,
Advocates, for the appellant.
Mr. Amit Himalvi, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 4 and
8(iii).
Mr. Suneet Verma, Advocate, vice Mr. Varun Rana,
Advocate, for respondents No.9(ii), 9(iii), 9(iv), 10(iii), 11 to
13, 15(i) to 15(iii).
r to
CMP(M) No.431 of 2025 & CMP(M) No.432 of 2025
Steps for the service of legal heir of deceased respondent
No.10 (ii), i.e., Shankar Dass, details whereof have been given in
para-2 of the application, be taken within three days. On taking
such steps, issue notice to the said legal heir, returnable within
four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 22, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
National Highway Authority of India vs. Sunder Nagar
Integrated Rural Development Association
OMP(M) No.120 of 2025
.
22.05.2025 Present: Ms. Shreya Chauhan, Advocate, for the applicant/
appellant.
On taking steps during the course of the day, Dasti notice
be issued to the respondent, returnable for 30.05.2025. Dasti
notice be handed over to learned counsel for the applicant for
effecting service upon the non-applicant-respondent, latest by
24.05.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 22, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
State of HP and others vs. Vinod Kumar and others
CMP(M) No.1650 of 2024
.
22.05.2025 Present: Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the applicants-appellants/State.
Mr. B.S. Chauhan, Senior Advocate with Mr Abhishek
Thakur and Ms. Aditi Rana, Advocate, for respondents
No.1 to 7(a).
Respondent No.8 is stated to have expired.
CMP(M) No.496 & 497 of 2025
Mr. B.S. Chauhan, learned Senior Counsel, assisted by
Ms. Aditi Rana, Advocate, has put in appearance on behalf of
legal heris of deceased respondent No.8.
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the said non-
applicants. The other non-applicants also do not intend to file any
reply to the present applications. They have no objection, if in
case, the applications are allowed and the legal heirs of
deceased respondent No.8, are brought on record as is being
sought in the application (CMP(M) No.496 of 2025).
Respondent No.8 is stated to have expired on 29.03.2024.
The same is evident form the Death Certificate appended along-
with the application (CMP(M) No.496 of 2025) as Annexure A-I.
The details of the legal heirs are given in Paragraph-4 of the
application (CMP(M) No.496 of 2025). The same is in
consonance with the details given in Legal Heirs Certificate
appended along with the application (CMP(M) No.496 of 2025) as
Annexure A-II.
Since the right to sue inheres/survives in the legal heirs of
deceased respondent No.8, details whereof, have been given in
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Paragraph-4 of the application (CMP(M) No.496 of 2025),
.
therefore, they are ordered to be brought on record.
For the bona fide reasons stated/sufficient cause shown in
the application (CMP(M) No.497 of 2025), delay in bringing on
record the legal heirs of deceased respondent No.8, is condoned
and abatement, if any, is set aside.
The applications stand disposed of. Amended memo of
parties filed with the applications is ordered to be taken on record.
Power of attorney on behalf of the newly added
respondent stands already filed.
CMP(M) No.1650 of 2024
In filing of the present appeal, there is a delay of 44 days.
The same has been duly explained in the application filed for
condonation of delay. Even otherwise, while dealing with an
application for condonation of delay filed by the State, one has to
be conscious of the bureaucratic delays, impersonal nature of the
governmental functioning, institutional interest and hence a
justice oriented liberal approach has to be taken while dealing
with such applications.
In this respect, it would be appropriate to refer to decision
of the Hon’ble Apex Court passed in State of Manipur and
others vs. Koting Lamkang, 2019 (10) SCC 408. The relevant
extract of the same is being reproduced herein below:-
“7. But while concluding as above, it was necessary for
the Court to also be conscious of the bureaucratic delay
and the slow pace in reaching a government decision and
the routine way of deciding whether the State should
prefer an appeal against a judgment adverse to it. Even::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
while observing that the law of limitation would harshly
affect the party, the Court felt that the delay in the appeal.
filed by the State, should not be condoned. against a
judgment adverse to it. Even while observing that the law
of limitation would harshly affect the party, the Court felt
that the delay in the appeal filed by the State, should notbe condoned.
8. Regard should be had in similar such circumstances to
the impersonal nature of the Government’s functioning
where individual officers may fail to act responsibly. Thisin turn, would result in injustice to the institutional interest
of the State. If the appeal filed by State are lost for
individual default, those who are at fault, will not usually
be individually affected”
Other than the aforesaid, it would also be appropriate to
refer to judgment dated 09.10.2023, passed in Civil Appeal
No.5867 of 2015 titled Sheo Raj Singh (deceased) through
LRs. and others vs. Union of India and another. The relevant
extract of the same is being reproduced herein below:-.
“37. Having bestowed serious consideration to the rival
contentions, we feel that the High Court’s decision to
condone the delay on account of the first respondent’sinability to present the appeal within time, for the reasons
assigned therein, does not suffer from any error
warranting interference. As the aforementioned
judgments have shown, such an exercise of discretion
does, at times, call for a liberal and justice- oriented
approach by the Courts, where certain leeway could be
provided to the State. The hidden forces that are at work
in preventing an appeal by the State being presented
within the prescribed period of limitation so as not to allow
a higher court to pronounce upon the legality and validity
of an order of a lower court and thereby secure unholy
gains, can hardly be ignored. Impediments in the working
of the grand scheme of governmental functions have to
be removed by taking a pragmatic view on balancing ofthe competing interests.”
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Hence, for the reasons/sufficient cause stated in the
.
application & the aforesaid position of law, delay in filing the
present appeal is condoned. The application stands disposed of.
RFA No.______/2025 (Be registered)
Admit.
Call for the records.
CMP No._____of 2025 ( Be registered)
During the pendency of the present appeal, operation
and execution of judgment/award dated 20.04.2024, passed by
learned Additional District Judge(II), Shimla, H.P., in Ref.
Petition RBT No.4-S/4 of 2019, shall remain stayed, subject to
deposit of the entire awarded amount along-with up-to-date
interest accrued thereupon, within a period of eight weeks.
The application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 22, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
Union of India vs. Jagat Ram and another
CMP(M) No.1498 of 2024
.
22.05.2025 Present: Mr. Bharat Bhushan, Senior Panel Counsel, for the
applicant/petitioner.
Mr. Maan Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.2/State.
Learned Senior Panel Counsel submits that the case at
hand has been assigned to him today itself, therefore, he seeks
time to prepare the case. Prayer allowed. List after six weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 22, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Jagdev Singh (deceased) through LRs ad others vs.
Gian Chand
CMP(M) No.144 of 2024
.
22.05.2025 Present: Mr. Arun Sehgal, Advocate, for the applicants/appellants.
Mr. Atharv Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent.
Time to file rejoinder is sought since 21.08.2024.
However, the same has not been filed till date. Let the same be
positively filed within two weeks.
However, it is made clear that if rejoinder is not filed on or
before the next date of hearing, then the right to file the same
shall stand closed without further reference to this Court.
List after two weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 22, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
M/s Aggarwal Agencies vs. Vijay Kumar Sharma
Civil Revision No.143 of 2024
.
22.05.2025 Present: Ms. Seema Guleria, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Karan Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent.
CMP No.4581 of 2025
Learned counsel for the non-applicant submits that reply
has been filed, however, the Registry has raised certain
objections with respect to some of the documents which are
sought to be placed on record. For removal of the objections
raised by the Registry in the reply so filed, learned counsel for the
applicant submits that she needs two weeks time to remove the
same.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that he has
received a copy of the reply and has already filed rejoinder
thereto, which has been placed at Part-B of the petition.
Learned counsel for the non-applicant to ensure that the
reply is in order and placed on record well before the next date of
hearing.
List after three weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 22, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Anil Kumar vs. Ajay Kumar
Civil Suit No.61 of 2024
.
22.05.2025 Present: Mr. N.K. Bhalla, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Mr. Arvind Sharma, Advocate, for the defendant.
Learned counsel for the parties submit that the matter
stands compromised between the parties and in view thereof they
intend to place on record the compromise deed by way of an
appropriate application.
Let the needful be done on or before the next date of
hearing. List on 02.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 22, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Shyam Murari (deceased) through LRs. vs. Yogesh
Kumar and others
CMP(M) No.1076 of 2023 in RSA No.223 of 2012
.
22.05.2025 Present: Mr. Vijay Kumar, Advocate, vice Mr. Sanjeev K. Suri,
Advocate, for the applicants/appellants.
Respondent No.1 is stated to have expired.
Mr. Navlesh Verma, Advocate, for respondent-Bank No.2.
Further time prayed on behalf of learned counsel for the
applicants-appellants to inspect the record. Prayer allowed.
List after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 22, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Jog Ram vs. Hira Lal
RSA No.254 of 2023
.
22.05.2025 Present: Mr. Surya Chauhan, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Pawan Kumar, Advocate, for the respondent.
RSA No.254 of 2023
List after eight weeks. In the meanwhile, power of attorney
on behalf of the appellant be also filed.
CMP No.16824 of 2023
Operation and execution of impugned judgment and
decree dated 20.04.2023, passed by learned Additional District
Judge, Kullu, H.P., in Civil Appeal No.03 of 2023, shall remain
stayed, subject to deposit of the entire decretal amount along-with
up-to-date interest, within a period of eight weeks from today.
The application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 22, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Machhindernath Mandir & Machhiyal Sudhar Society
vs. Hari Singh and another
Civil Suit No.38 of 2023
.
22.05.2025 Present: Mr. P.P. Chauhan, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Defendant No.1 already ex parte.
Mr. Narender Singh Thakur, Advocate, for defendant No.2.
Since pleadings in the matter are complete, therefore, list
concerned, on 19.06.2025.
r to
the same for admission and denial before the Registrar
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 22, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Sushma Devi vs. Joginder Singh and others
CMPMO No.258 of 2022
.
22.05.2025 Present: Mr. R.L. Chaudhary, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms. Vandana Kumari, Advocate, vice Mr. Sanjay Jaswal,
Advocate, for all the respondents, except respondent No.1,
who is stated to be dead.
The present petition stands abated insofar as respondent
No.1 is concerned.
List after six weeks.
It is made clear that mere pendency of this petition shall
not preclude the trial Court to proceed further in the matter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 22, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Surjeet Kumar Sharma and another vs. Om Parkash
(deceased) through LRs. and others
Civil Suit No.156 of 2021
.
22.05.2025 Present: Mr. Ashok Kumar Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rajat
Kumar, Advocate, for the plaintiffs.
Mr. V.S. Rathore, Advocate, for defendants No.2, 3 and 5.
Defendant No.4 is stated to have expired.
Mr. Arvind Sharma, Advocate, for defendants No.6 & 7.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
defendant No.8/State.
OMP No.649 of 2025
The present application has been filed for effecting service
of proposed legal representative No.4(d)-Smt. Pawna through
publication.
The brother of the said legal heir is already on record as
defendant No.2. He is duly represented by his counsel. Learned
counsel appearing on behalf of defendant No.2 submits that the
correct address of his sister, i.e., proposed legal representative
No.4(d)-Smt. Pawna, shall be furnished to the plaintiffs within two
weeks. On furnishing the same, learned counsel for the plaintiffs
submits that fresh steps for service of proposed legal
representative No.4(d)-Smt. Pawna, shall be taken. On taking
such steps, issue notice to the said proposed legal
representative, returnable within four weeks. The application
stands disposed of.
OMP No.650 of 2025
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to defendant
No.1(a)-Diksha, who is proposed to be appointed as guardian for
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
the proposed minor legal representative No.1(b)-Arnav, by way of
.
present application, returnable within four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 22, 2025 (KS) Judge
r to
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
State of HP and others vs. Yoginder Chand
RFA No.454 of 2018
.
21.05.2025 Present: Mr. R.P. Singh, Deputy Advocate General, for the
appellants/State.
Mr. H.C. Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent.
Due to paucity of time, the matter could not be taken up for
hearing today.
Since, in the case at hand, an early hearing application
was allowed vide order dated 27.02.2025, therefore, list the same
for consideration in the first week of July, 2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 21, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Bal Singh vs. Anant Ram and another
RSA No.155 of 2024
.
21.05.2025 Present: None for the appellant.
Mr. R.L. Chaudhary, Advocate, for the respondent.
Despite repeated calls, there is no appearance on behalf
of the appellant. In the interest of justice, list on 29.05.2025.
May 21, 2025 (KS)
to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Paras Ram vs. Prem Chand and another
RSA No.199 of 2023
.
21.05.2025 Present: Mr. Dinesh Kumar Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Imran Khan, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Ashok Kumar Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
Record stands received.
Learned counsel for the parties intend to go through the
same. r
List after six weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 21, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
State of HP vs. Maharaj Di Kutiya and others
RSA No.40 of 2023
.
21.05.2025 Present: Mr. R.P. Singh, Deputy Advocate General, for the
appellant/State.
Mr. Digvijay Singh, Advocate, for respondents No.1 and 2.
None for respondent No.3.
At the joint request of learned counsel for the parties, list
after four weeks.
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
May 21, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Mohan Lal vs. Kewal Ram and another
RSA No.26 of 2025
.
21.05.2025 Present: Mr. G.D. Verma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sumit Sharma,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Tek Chand Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Admitted on substantial questions of law No.2 and 3,
formulated at Pages-16 & 17 of the paper book.
Records be called for.
Notice. Mr. Tek Chand Sharma, learned counsel, appears
and waives service of notice on behalf of respondent No.1. On
taking steps within three days, notice be issued to respondent
No.2, returnable within six weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 21, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Jaswant Singh and others vs. Shyam Lal and others
RSA No.277 of 2024
.
21.05.2025 Present: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Tarun Brakta,
Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Praveen Chauhan, Advocate, vice Mr. Y.P. Sood,
Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 10.
RSA No.277 of 2024
Power of attorney on behalf of respondents No.1 to 5 be
filed on or before the next date of hearing.
As prayed, list after six weeks.
CMP No.22314 of 2024
Reply, if any, be filed on or before the next date of hearing.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 21, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Jaswant Singh and others vs. Shyam Lal and others
RSA No.276 of 2024
.
21.05.2025 Present: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Tarun Brakta,
Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Praveen Chauhan, Advocate, vice Mr. Y.P. Sood,
Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 10.
RSA No.276 of 2024
Power of attorney on behalf of respondents No.1 and 2 be
filed on or before the next date of hearing.
As prayed, list after six weeks.
CMP No.22307 of 2024
Rejoinder, if any, be filed on or before the next date of
hearing.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 21, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
State of HP and another vs. Raksha Devi and another
RSA No.267 of 2024
.
21.05.2025 Present: Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
appellants/State.
Mr. Kunal Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Naresh Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
Further time prayed on behalf of the respondents to
peruse the records. Prayer allowed.
List for consideration after six weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 21, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Medh Ram and others vs. Uma Devi
RSA No.218 of 2024
.
21.05.2025 Present: Ms. Devyani Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Anirudh
Sharma, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Rakesh Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Shivam Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.2 to 4.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.1
submits that learned Senior arguing counsel is unavailable today
on account of personal difficulty. He seeks an adjournment.
Prayer not opposed.
As prayed, list after six weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 21, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Nes Ram vs. Mehar Chand and others
RSA No.217 of 2024
.
21.05.2025 Present: Mr. Maan Singh, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. G.R. Palsra, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 5.
Mr. R.P. Singh, Deputy Advocate General, for respondent
No.6/State.
Record stands received.
Learned counsel for the parties intend to go through the
same. r
List after six weeks. In the meanwhile, up-to-date use and
occupation charges be also deposited.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 21, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Ashwani Kumar and Anr. vs. Shashi Kumar and Ors.
RSA No.200 of 2024
.
21.05.2025 Present: Mr. Tek Chand, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Surender Verma, Advocate, for respondents No.1, 3,
5(i)(a) to 5(i)(d) and 6.
CMP No.12615 of 2024
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the
respondents. Heard counsel for the parties. Interim order dated
13.08.2024 is made absolute. The application stands disposed
of.
RSA No.200 of 2024
List after six weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 21, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Jasjit Kaur & another vs. Pyare Lal Chopra (deceased)
through LRs. and others a/w connected
RSA No.76 of 2024 and 77 of 2020
RSA No.76 of 2024
.
21.05.2025 Present: Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Senior Advocate with Mr. Diwan Singh
Negi, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No. 1(a).
Mr. Vedhant Ranta, Advocate, vice Mr. Janesh Gupta,
Advocate, for respondent No. 4(a).
Ms. Sanjivani Sood, Advocate, for respondents No. 11(a)
to 11(c).
Mr. Vishwas Kaushal, Advocate, for respondent No. 12.
Mr. Devender K. Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.
14.
Mr. Anuj Gupta, Advocate, for respondent No. 4(b).
None for respondents No. 1(b) to 1(d), 2, 3(b) to 3(f), 5, 7
to 10 and 15.
RSA No. 77 of 2020
Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Senior Advocate with Mr. Diwan Singh
Negi, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No. 1(a).
Mr. Vedhant Ranta, Advocate, vice Mr. Janesh Gupta,
Advocate, for respondent No. 4(a).
Ms. Sanjivani Sood, Advocate, for respondents No. 11(a)
to 11(c).
Mr. Vishwas Kaushal, Advocate, for respondent No. 12.
Mr. Atul Verma, Advocate vice Mr. V.B. Verma, Advocate,
for respondent No. 13.
None for respondents No. 5, 7, 10, 14 and 15.
At the joint request of learned counsel for the parties, list
after six weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 21, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Shakuntla vs. Sabhabu and others
RSA No.3 of 2024
.
21.05.2025 Present: Mr. Sanjeev Kuthiala, Senior Advocate with Mr. Abhishek,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Ashok Sharma, Senior Advocate with Ms. Anubhuti
Sharma, Advocate, for the respondents.
At the joint request of learned counsel for the parties, list
after four weeks.
r ( Bipin C. Negi )
May 21, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Bihari Lal and others vs. State of HP and others
CMPMO No.612 of 2023
.
21.05.2025 Present: Mr. Shekhar Badola and Mr. P.K. Chauhan, Advocate, for
the petitioners.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.1/State.
Respondents No.2 to 11, 13 to 16 proceeded against ex
parte vide order dated 22.04.2024.
Respondent No.12 is stated to have expired.
CMP No.4228 of 2025
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is
allowed. The Death Certificate of deceased respondent No.12
and details of legal heirs are taken on record. The application
stands disposed of.
CMP(M) No.1790 & 1791 of 2024
Though served, none of the legal heirs of deceased
respondent No.12 have put in appearance.
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicants. The non-applicants have no objection, if in case, the
applications are allowed and the legal heirs of deceased
respondent No.12, are brought on record as is being sought in
the application (CMP(M) No.1790 of 2024).
Respondent No.12 is stated to have expired on
13.07.2024. The details of the legal heirs are given in Paragraph-
2 of the application (CMP(M) No.1790 of 2024).
The right to sue inheres/survives with the legal heirs of
deceased respondent No.12, details whereof, have been given in
in Paragraph-2 of the application (CMP(M) No.1790 of 2024).
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
One of the proposed LRs of deceased respondent No.12-Azad
.
Singh, i.e., mother-Roshni Devi, depicted as LR-12(e) is already
stated to be on record as respondent No.13. In view thereof, LR-
12(a) to 12(d) and 12(f) are ordered to be brought on record.
For the bona fide reasons stated/sufficient cause shown in
the application (CMP(M) No.1791 of 2024), delay in bringing on
record the legal heirs of deceased respondent No.12, is
condoned and abatement, if any, is set aside.
The applications stand disposed of. Amended memo of
parties placed at Page-95 of the paper book alongwith CMP
No.4228 of 2025 is ordered to be taken on record.
CMPMO No.612 of 2023
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the
newly added respondents No.12(a) to 12(d) and 12(f),
returnabdle within four weeks.
CMP No.4229 of 2025
Allowed and the applicants are exempted from filing the
translated copies of the documents (Annexure MA-1 and MA-2),
in question, annexed with the accompanying petition, at this
stage, subject to filing of the same within seven days, as and
when directed to do so. The application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 21, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Lachhu Ram (deceased) through his LRs. Jiwa Nand
vs. LAC, HPPWD and others
RFA No.54 of 2024
.
20.05.2025 Present: Mr. Digvijay Singh, Advocate, vice Mr. Pradeep Verma,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondents/State.
CMP(M) No.736 of 2025
Before the Reference Court, proforma respondent No.3
had been served by way of affixation in terms of order dated
16.08.2023, passed by the Reference Court.
As per report of service, specifically order dated
11.03.2025, passed by the Additional Registrar (Judicial), it is
evident that the said proforma respondent is unserved and he is
reported to be missing for the last many years.
The applicant, proforma respondents No.3 and 4 are the
legal heirs of the erstwhile petitioner, i.e., Lachhi Ram @ Lachhu
Ram (deceased). By virtue of registered Will dated 08.06.2025,
the Estate of the deceased petitioner, i.e., Lachhi Ram @ Lachhu
Ram is stated to have solely devolved upon Jiwa Nand, the
present petitioner.
In view thereof, the present application is allowed. Name
of proforma respondent No.3, i.e., Rama Nand is ordered to be
deleted from the array of the parties. The application stands
disposed of. Amended memo of parties be filed within four
weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 20, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Mohan Singh vs. Asha Ram and another
RSA No.245 of 2023
.
20.05.2025 Present: Mr. Rajiv Sirkeck, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Chandan Goel, Advocate, for the respondents.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant has
placed reliance upon the decision of the Apex Court in T.D. Vivek
Kumar and Anr. vs. Ranbir Chaudhary, 2023(3) Civil Court
Cases 278 (S.C.).
reproduced herein below:-
r to
Relevant portion of the same is being
“6.4 An identical question came to be considered by this
Court in the case of P. D’souza (supra) and after
considering the earlier decision of this Court in the case
of M.L. Devender Singh Vs. Syed Khaja (1973) 2 SCC 515,
this Court observed and held that where the sum named is
an amount the payment of which may be substituted for the
performance of the act at the election of the person by
whom the money is to be paid or the act done, the Court
may refuse to pass the decree for specific performance. In
the present case, the condition specifically stipulates that in
case of failure on the part of the seller to execute the sale
deed within the stipulated time the buyer shall be entitled to
double the amount given as an advance. Therefore, the sum
is specifically named i.e., double the amount of advance
paid. Though, the High Court has relied upon the decision in
the case of P. D’souza (supra), the aforesaid aspect has not
been considered by the High Court, more particularly, the
observations made in paragraph 31 in its true perspective.”
Faced with the aforesaid, learned counsel appearing on
behalf of the respondents seeks time to go through the record
and the aforesaid judgment.
List after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 20, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Ravinder Nath (deceased) through LRs. vs. Dasaudhi
Ram (deceased) through LRs. and another
RSA No.241 of 2023
.
20.05.2025 Present: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Manoj Brakta,
Advocate, for the appellants.
None for respondent No.1(i), 1(iii), 1(v) and 2.
Record stands received.
Learned counsel for the appellants intends to go through
the same. r
List after six weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 20, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Essjay Ericsson Pvt. Ltd. vs. Jitender Singh
CMPMO No.141 of 2023
.
20.05.2025 Present: Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate, vice Dr. Rajesh Kumar
Parmar, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Rupam Chauhan, Advocate, vice Dr. Lalit Kumar
Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent.
As jointly prayed, list after four weeks.
May 20, 2025 (KS)
to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Rajesh Kumar and others vs. Chander Ballabh and
another
RSA No.105 of 2023
.
20.05.2025 Present: Mr. G.D. Verma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sumit Sharma,
Advocate, for the appellants.
None for respondent No.1.
Mr. K.D. Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Het Ram Thakur,
Advocate, for respondent No.2.
same.
Record stands received.
Learned counsel for the parties intend to go through the
List after six weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 20, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Arun Sharma vs. Sushma Devi
CMPMO No.354 of 2022
.
20.05.2025 Present: Ms. Sana Rana, Advocate, vice Ms. Rachna Kuthiala,
Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Ajay Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. Sunny Modgill,
Advocate, for the respondent.
Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of the
petitioners submits that learned Senior arguing counsel is
unavailable today on account of personal difficulty. She seeks an
adjournment. Prayer not opposed.
As prayed, list after six weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 20, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Chande Ram and others vs. Tulsi Ram
RSA No.138 of 2021
.
20.05.2025 Present: Mr. Sohail Khan, Advocate, vice Mr. Rajesh Kumar,
Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Naveen K. Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the respondent.
As jointly prayed, list after four weeks.
May 20, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Rai Singh vs. HRTC and another
Execution Petition No.310 of 2025
.
20.05.2025 Present: Mr. Sat Prakash, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate, for the respondents.
Notice. Mr. Raman Jamalta, learned Advocate, appears
and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents and
seeks time to file reply.
Reply/instructions on behalf of the respondents be filed on
or before the next date of hearing. List on 21.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 20, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Vijay Sharma vs. HPTDC Ltd.
Execution Petition No.304 of 2025
.
20.05.2025 Present: Mr. Om Parkash Goel, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms Maheshwari Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent.
Notice. Ms. Maheshwari Sharma, learned Advocate,
appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondent
and seeks time to file reply.
Reply/instructions on behalf of the respondent be filed on
or before the next date of hearing. List after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 20, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Krishan Dhani vs. HPTDC Ltd.
Execution Petition No.301 of 2025
.
20.05.2025 Present: Mr. Om Parkash Goel, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms Maheshwari Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent.
Notice. Ms. Maheshwari Sharma, learned Advocate,
appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondent
and seeks time to file reply.
Reply/instructions on behalf of the respondent be filed on
or before the next date of hearing. List after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 20, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Gopindra vs. Pawan Kumar and others
RSA No.23 of 2025
.
20.05.2025 Present: Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Pranjal
Munjal, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. G.R. Palsra, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 3,
4(iv).
CMP No.10708 of 2025
Reply, if any, be filed by the non-applicants within four
weeks. List thereafter.
CMP No.3140 of 2025
Heard counsel for the parties. Interim order dated
04.03.2025 is made absolute. The application stands disposed
of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 20, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Medisys Biotech Pvt. Ltd. vs. Ramesh Kumar
CMP(M) No.21 of 2025
.
20.05.2025 Present: Ms. Madhurika Sekhon Verma, Advocate, for the
applicant.
Mr. Vishal Panwar, Advocate, for the respondent.
CMP(M) No.21 of 2025
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicant.
Heard counsel for the parties. Perused the pleadings. For
the sufficient reasons and cause shown in the application, delay
of 63 days in filing the present appeal, is condoned. The
application stands disposed of.
RSA No._____of 2025
It be registered.
List for admission after four weeks. In the meanwhile,
power of attorney on behalf of the respondent be filed.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 20, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Gulabe Ram vs. Budhi Ram and others
CMP(M) No.1838 of 2024 in RSA No.77 of 2024
.
20.05.2025 Present: Mr. Tejasvi Verma, Advocate, for the applicant, through
video conferencing.
Mr. Mukesh Bisht, Advocate, for respondents No.2 & 3.
Respondent No.1 is stated to have expired.
At the request of learned counsel for respondents No.2
r to
and 3, list after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 20, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Devku and another vs. Lekh Ram and another
CMP(M) No.641 of 2024 in RSA No.119 of 2020
.
20.05.2025 Present: Ms. Kusum Chaudhary, Advocate, for the applicants.
Mr. Romesh Verma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Digvijay
Singh Bisht, Advocate, for the respondents.
Rejoinder, if any, be filed within three weeks. List
thereafter.
May 20, 2025 (KS)
to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Bangali Ram (deceased) through LRs. vs. Tulsi Ram
(deceased) through LRs.
RSA No.266 of 2024
.
20.05.2025 Present: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Tarun Brakta,
Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Pranjal Munjal, Advocate, for respondent No.1(a).
CMP No.10571 of 2025
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is
allowed. The application stands disposed of.
RSA No.266 of 2024
Let respondent No.1(b) be served through ordinary as well
as through dasti process. On taking steps during the course of
the day, dasti summons be provided to the counsel for the
appellants within two days. Steps for service through the ordinary
process be taken within two days. On taking such steps, issue
notice to the said respondent. Both the summons be made
returnable for 23.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 20, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Inder Singh vs. HRTC and others
RFA No.33 of 2023
.
20.05.2025 Present: Mr. Davinder Chauhan Jaita, Advocate, for the appellant/
applicant.
Mr. Ajay Kumar Chauhan, Advocate, for respondents No.1
and 2.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.3/State.
CMP No.5584 of 2023
Since the appeal stands registered post condonation of
delay in filing the appeal vide order dated 23.08.2023, therefore,
the same has become infructuous. The same stands accordingly
disposed of.
CMP No.4798 of 2025
Reply be filed on or before the next date of hearing.
Registry to ascertain, as to whether amount of compensation
awarded in the case at hand has been deposited in other appeal,
i.e., RFA No.74 of 2020.
List on 05.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 20, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Simar Preet Singh vs. Baryam Singh and others
Civil Suit No.24 of 2021
.
20.05.2025 Present: Mr. Romesh Verma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Digvijay
Singh, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Pranjal
Munjal, Advocate, for the defendants.
Since pleadings in the matter are complete, therefore, list
the same for admission and denial before the Registrar
concerned, on 17.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 20, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
State of HP & others vs. Murki Lal and others
CMP No.9966 of 2015 in
RFA No.438 of 2006
.
20.05.2025 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
appellants/ State.
Mr. Prince Verma, Advocate, for respondents No.1 and 2.
Further time prayed on behalf of the appellants to comply
with order dated 30.04.2025.
Let the needful be done within four weeks. List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 20, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Baldev Singh & others vs. Bishan Swaroop
RSA No.387 of 2014
.
20.05.2025 Present: Mr. Dinesh Bhanot, Advocate, for the appellants.
Ms. Sana Rana, Advocate vice Ms. Rachna Kuthiala,
Advocate, for the respondent.
CMP(M) No.711 of 2025
Heard counsel for the parties and perused the pleadings.
Appellant No.5-Smt. Malika is stated to have died on 28.04.2023.
The same is evident from the Death Certificate appended along-
with the present application. Deceased appellant No.5-Smt.
Malika is survived by her legal heirs detailed in Paragraph-2 of
the present application.
Since the right to sue inheres/survives in the legal heirs of
deceased appellant No.5-Smt. Malika, details whereof, have been
given in Paragraph-2 of the present application, therefore, they
are ordered to be brought on record.
For the bona fide reasons stated/sufficient cause shown in
the application, delay in bringing on record the legal heirs of
deceased appellant No.5-Smt. Malika, is condoned and
abatement, if any, is set aside.
The application stands disposed of. Amended memo of
parties, if not already filed, be filed within two weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 20, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Asa Ram vs. Medh Ram and others a/w connected
matter
RSA No.120 of 2014 a/w RSA No.125 of 2014
.
RSA No.120 of 2014
20.05.2025 Present: Ms. Sana Rana, Advocate vice Ms. Rachna Kuthiala,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Sumit Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. B.C. Verma,
Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Ms. Ambika Kotwal, Advocate, for respondents No.2 and
3.
RSA No.125 of 2025
Mr. Sumit Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. B.C. Verma,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Ms. Sana Rana, Advocate vice Ms. Rachna Kuthiala,
Advocate, for the respondent.
CMP No.10759 of 2025 in RSA No.120 of 2014
Allowed and the applicant is exempted from filing typed/
translated copies of the documents (Annexure R-3 & R-4), in
question, annexed with the accompanying appeal, at this stage,
subject to filing of the same within seven days, as and when
directed to do so. The application stands disposed of.
CMP(M) No.714 of 2025 in RSA No.120 of 2014
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the legal
heirs of deceased profomra respondent No.3, details whereof,
have been given in Paragraph-4 of the application, returnable
within four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 20, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Ravinder Paul (since deceased) through LRs. and
another vs. Sashi Paul
.
RSA No.263 of 2011
20.05.2025 Present: Mr. Suneet Goel, Senior Advocate with Mr. Aman
Hansretta, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Amit Singh Chandel, Advocate, for the respondent.
CMP No.10837 of 2025
For the reasons stated in the application, early hearing of
the appeal is allowed. The application stands disposed of.
RSA No.263 of 2011
List for hearing in the 3rd week of July, 2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 20, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Tarsem Singh and others vs. Ramesh Chand and
others
RSA No.706 of 2008 a/w
Cross Objection No.67 of 2009
.
20.05.2025 Present: Mr. N.K. Thakur, Senior Advocate with Mr. Divya Raj
Singh, Advocate, for the appellants/non-cross objector.
Ms. Sana Rana, Advocate vice Ms. Rachna Kuthiala,
Advocate, for respondents No. 1, 2, 4(a) to 4(c), 5 to
8/cross-objectors.
None for respondents No. 3(a) and 3(b), 9 to 13 and 15 to
21.
Respondent No. 14 is stated to have expired.
Names of respondents No. 22, 25 to 27 stand deleted.
CMP(M) No.681 of 2025 in C.O. No.67 of 2009
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicants. The non-applicants have no objection, if in case, the
application is allowed.
I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused
the pleadings. Proforma respondent No.14-Jagdish Singh is
stated to have died on 22.10.2022. The same is evident from the
Death Certificate appended along with the present application.
From perusal of the application, it is evident that legal heirs
of deceased proforma respondent No.14-Jagdish Singh are
already on record as proforma respondents No.9 to 13.
In view thereof, present application is allowed. Name of
proforma respondent No.14-Jagdish Singh is ordered to be
deleted from the array of the respondents, subject to just all
exceptions.
The application stands disposed of. Amended memo filed
along-with present application is ordered to be taken on record.
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
RSA No.706 of 2008
In view of order passed in CMP(M) No.681 of 2025 in
.
Cross Objection No.67 of 2009, whereby name of proforma
respondent No.14-Jagdish Singh stands deleted, present
appellant does not intend to move any application. He submits
that the necessary correction be also made in the cause title of
the appeal by deleting the name of proforma respondent No.14.
Accordingly, name of proforma respondent No.14-Jagdish Singh
is ordered to be deleted from the array of the respondents,
subject to just all exceptions. Registry to make necessary
corrections accordingly.
List after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 20, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Collector Land Acquisition vs. Khem Dev and others
CMP Nos.25755 & 25756 of 2024 in
RFA No.90 of 2006
.
19.05.2025 Present: None for the non-applicant/appellant.
Mr. Manjeet Kaur, Advocate, vice Mr. Naveen K. Bhardwaj,
Advocate, for applicant/respondent No.2(a).
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for
respondents No.5 and 6/State.
CMP No.25755 of 2024
Despite service, no one has put in appearance on behalf
of the non applicant.
The appeal, in the case at hand, was disposed of by a Co-
ordinate Bench of this Court, on 10.04.2008. No further
proceedings are stated to be pending before the Apex Court.
Respondent No.2-Surat Ram is stated to have died on
03.01.2007. He is survived by the present applicant. The factum
of death of respondent No.2-Surat Ram is evident from the Death
Certificate appended along-with the present application as
Annexure R-1. The details of the legal heir is evident from the
Legal Heir Certificate appended along with present application as
Annexure R-2. However, as per the same, the deceased is
survived by the present applicant and Mani Devi (daughter).
However, on further perusal of the same, it is evident that the
entire immovable property, by virtue of Will, has been bequeathed
upon the present applicant.
In view thereof, right to receive compensation survives in
the said legal heirs. For the aforesaid reasons, present
application is allowed. The applicant is permitted to be brought
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
on record as legal heir of deceased. Amended memo of parties
.
filed at Page-21 of the paper book is ordered to be taken on
record.
CMP No.25756 of 2024
Despite service, no one has put in appearance on behalf
of the non applicant.
The appeal, in the case at hand, was disposed of by a Co-
ordinate Bench of this Court, on 10.04.2008.
r No further
proceedings are stated to be pending before the Apex Court.
By virtue of present application, the amount lying
deposited in the Registry of this Court along-with interest accrued
thereupon, is sought to be released in favour of the applicant.
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is
allowed. The amount lying deposited in the Registry of this Court
along-with proportionate interest accrued thereupon is ordered to
be released in favour of the applicant, i.e., legal heir of deceased
Surat Ram (respondent No.2), in terms of his share, detailed in
Paragraph-3 of the application. The amount be remitted to the
bank account, details whereof, have been given in Paragraph-7 of
the application, subject to proper verification. The application
stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 19, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Rajeev Kumar and another vs. Het Ram
RSA No.292 of 2023
.
19.05.2025 Present: Mr. Parikshit Sharma, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Ashok Kumar Tyagi, Advocate, for the respondent.
Further time prayed for going through the record. As
prayed, list after four weeks.
May 19, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Naresh Kumar and another vs. Bharti Sharma and
another a/w connected matter
CMPMO Nos.26 and 501 of 2023
.
CMPMO No.26 of 2023
19.05.2025 Present: Mr. P.S. Goverdhan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vivek Singh
Attri, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Tarun Brakta,
Advocate, for the respondents.
CMPMO No.501 of 2023
Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Tarun Brakta,
Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. P.S. Goverdhan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vivek Singh
Attri, Advocate, for the respondents.
At the request of learned counsel for the petitioners, list on
26.05.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 19, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Asa Nand and Sons and others vs. Arvind Kumar Sood
a/w connected matters
Civil Revision No.52 of 2018 a/w
.
Civil Revision Nos.63, 120 and 137 of 2018
19.05.2025 Present: Ms. Kusum Chaudhary, Advocate, for the petitioners, in
CR Nos.52 and 63 of 2018 and for the respondents in CR
Nos.120 and 137 of 2018.
Mr. Parikshit Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Vipin Pandit,
Advocate, for the respondents, in CR Nos.52 and 63 of
2018 and for the petitioners in CR Nos.120 and 137 of
2018.
At the joint request of learned counsel for the parties, list
on 23.05.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 19, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Vinod Kumar vs. Som Prakash
Civil Revision No.61 of 2019
.
19.05.2025 Present: Mr. Vaibhav Tanwar, Advocate, vice Mr. Karan Singh
Kanwar, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Desh Raj Thakur, Advocate, for the respondent.
Learning vice counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner
submits that the original counsel is unavailable today on account
of personal difficulty and prays for an adjournment. Prayer
allowed. List for consideration after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 19, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Rameshwaru Sharma and others vs. Sukh Raj Singh
and others
CMPMO No.297 of 2017
.
19.05.2025 Present: Ms. Dhanwanti, Advocate, vice Mr. Sanjay Bhardwaj,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Respondents No.1 and 2 proceeded against ex parte vide
order dated 11.03.2020.
Respondents No.4 and 5 proceeded against ex parte vide
order dated 24.12.2018.
CMP No.10756 of 2025
The present application is dismissed as withdrawn.
CMPMO No.297 of 2017
Let steps for the service of respondents No.3 and 6 be
taken within three days. On taking such steps, issue notice to the
said respondents, returnable within four weeks.
It is made clear that if steps are not taken within the
aforesaid period, the present petition shall stand dismissed for
non prosecution without further reference to this Court.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 19, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Anil Kumar and another vs. Union of India and others
CMPMO No.276 of 2015
.
19.05.2025 Present: Mr. Ashok Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rajat,
Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Shashi Shirshoo, Senior Panel Counsel, for
respondents No.1 to 4.
None for respondents No.5, 6, 7 and 9, though served.
Name of respondent No.8 is deleted vide order dated
27.08.2024.
CMPMO No.276 of 2015
Let correct address of respondent No.10(i) be furnished
within a week. On furnishing the same, issue notice to the said
respondent, returnable within four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 19, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Chanderlekha & others vs. Harmesh and others
CMPMO No.303 of 2019
.
19.05.2025 Present: Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate, vice Mr. K.S. Kanwar,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Rupinder Singh Thakur, Advocate, for respondent
No.1 (stated to have expired).
Mr. Ashok Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rajat,
Advocate, for respondent No.5.
Respondent No.4 is stated to have expired.
Learned counsel for the parties jointly submit that the main
matter is pending adjudication before the trial Court.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that an
appropriate application for deletion of name of deceased
respondent No.4 has been filed. He further submits that
appropriate applications for bringing on record the legal heirs of
deceased petitioner No.1 and respondent No.1 have also been
filed. However, the same are not on record.
Registry to trace the applications so filed and place them
on record well before the next date of hearing, post removal of
objection(s), if any.
List after two weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 19, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Madho Dass vs. Chander Dass and others
CMP No.10755 of 2025 in
CMPMO No.429 of 2024
.
19.05.2025 Present: Mr. B.L. Soni, Advocate, for the applicant/petitioner.
CMP No.10755 of 2025
The case at hand was disposed of vide order dated
12.03.2025. At that stage, no notice had been issued to the
respondent.
r to
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is
allowed. Order dated 12.03.2025 is recalled. The appliation
stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 19, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Liaq Ram and others vs. State of HP and another
RFA No.287 of 2017
.
19.05.2025 Present: Mr. Ramesh Sharma, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondents/State.
CMP No.10665 of 2025
List all the connected matters on 29.05.2025.
May 19, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
HPSEBL vs. Phinu (deceased) through LRs and others
CMP No.10631 of 2025 in RFA No.17 of 2016
.
19.05.2025 Present: Ms. Sunita Sharma, Senior Advocate with Ms. Sugandh
Verma, Advocate, for the non-applicant-appellant.
Ms. Anuja Mehta, Advocate, vice Mr. Gurmeet Bhardwaj,
Advocate, for the applicant/respondents.
CMP No.10631 of 2025
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicants. The non-applicants have no objection, if in case, the
application is allowed and the legal heirs of deceased respondent
No.3, are brought on record as is being sought in the present
application.
Respondent No.3 is stated to have expired on 17.01.2015.
The same is evident from the Death Certificate appended along
with the present application as Annexure A-1. Deceased
respondent No.3 is survived by her legal heirs, details whereof,
have been given in the Legal Heir Certificate appended along-
with present application (at running page 160 of the paper book).
Since the right to sue inheres/survives with the legal heirs
of deceased respondent No.3, details whereof, have been given
in the Legal Heir Certificate appended along-with present
application, therefore, they are ordered to be brought on record.
The application stands disposed of. Amended memo of
parties filed with the present application is taken on record.
Power of attorney on behalf of the legal heirs brought on record
be filed if not already filed.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 19, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
HPSEB vs. Kashmir Singh and others
CMP No.10620 of 2025 in
RFA No.218 of 2012
.
19.05.2025 Present: Ms. Sunita Sharma, Senior Advocate with Ms. Sugandh
Verma, Advocate, for the non-applicant-appellant.
Mr. H.S. Rangra, Advocate, for the applicants/
respondents.
CMP No.10620 of 2025
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicants. The non-applicants have no objection, if in case the
amount lying deposited in this Registry of this Court along-with
proportionate interest accrued thereupon, is released in favour of
the applicants as is being sought in the application.
The appeal, in the case at hand, was disposed of by this
Court on 24.05.2017. Learned counsel for the parties submit that
no further proceedings against the said decision are pending
before the Hon’ble Apex Court.
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is
allowed. The amount lying deposited in the Registry of this Court
along-with proportionate interest accrued thereupon is ordered to
be released in favour of the applicants/respondents No.3 & 4, in
terms of their shares, detailed in Paragraph-2 of the application.
The amount be remitted to the bank accounts, details whereof,
have been given in Paragraph-4 of the application, subject to
proper verification. The application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 19, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
HPPCL and another vs. Shamsher Singh and others
RFA No.151 of 2018
.
19.05.2025 Present: Mr. Digvijay Singh Kanwar, Advocate, vice Mr. Vivek Negi,
Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. B.M. Chauhan, Senior Advocate with Ms. Meenakshi
Tarlokta, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 3, 4(a) to 4(c),
5, 6(e), 6(f), 7(a) to 7(e), 8 to 10, 12 to 19, 20(a), 20(b), 21,
22, 24, 26 to 29 and proprosed legal representatives of
deceased respondent No.23.
Name of repondent No.25 stands deleted.
Mr. Surya Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent No.30.
CMP No.10565, 10566, 10568 and 10569 of 2025
Reply/instructions be filed/obtained on or before the next
date of hearing. List after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 19, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Chitranjan Devi vs. Maya Devi
Cr.MP No.1858 of 2025 in
Cr. Revision No.607 of 2024
.
19.05.2025 Present: Mr. Bodh Raj, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent.
Cr.MP No.1858 of 2025
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is
allowed. Time for depositing 15% of the cheque amount as costs
before the Himachal Pradesh State Legal Services Authority,
Shimla, in terms of judgment dated 13.12.2024, passed in
Criminal Revision No.607 of 2024, is extended by four weeks
from today, i.e., 19.05.2025.
The application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 19, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Rajinder Kumar vs. Ravinder Kumar and another
Cr.MP No.1764 of 2025 in
Cr. Revision No.67 of 2025
.
19.05.2025 Present: Ms. Manjeet Kaur, Advocate, vice Mr. Naveen K.
Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Cr.MP No.1764 of 2025
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is
allowed. Time for depositing the compounding fee, in terms of
judgment dated 23.01.2025, is extended by two weeks from
today, i.e., 19.05.2025. The application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 19, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
The Govt. of HP and another vs. Pyaru
CMP(M) No.710 of 2025
.
19.05.2025 Present: Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the applicants-appellants/State.
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the
respondent, returnable within four weeks.
May 19, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
The State of HP and another vs. Prem Lal and others
CMP(M) No.707 of 2025
.
19.05.2025 Present: Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the applicants-appellants/State.
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the
respondents, returnable within four weeks.
May 19, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
State of HP and others vs. Shree Ram (deceased)
through LRs.
CMP(M) No.169 of 2025
.
19.05.2025 Present: Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the applicants-appellants/State.
CMP(M) No.169 of 2025
Though served, no one has put in appearance on behalf of
the respondents. Hence, they are proceeded against ex parte.
In filing of the present appeal, there is a delay of 124 days.
The same has been duly explained in the application filed for
condonation of delay. Even otherwise, while dealing with an
application for condonation of delay filed by the State, one has to
be conscious of the bureaucratic delays, impersonal nature of the
governmental functioning, institutional interest and hence a
justice oriented liberal approach has to be taken while dealing
with such applications.
In this respect, it would be appropriate to refer to decision
of the Hon’ble Apex Court passed in State of Manipur and
others vs. Koting Lamkang, 2019 (10) SCC 408. The relevant
extract of the same is being reproduced herein below:-
“7. But while concluding as above, it was necessary for
the Court to also be conscious of the bureaucratic delay
and the slow pace in reaching a government decision and
the routine way of deciding whether the State should
prefer an appeal against a judgment adverse to it. Even
while observing that the law of limitation would harshly
affect the party, the Court felt that the delay in the appeal
filed by the State, should not be condoned. against a
judgment adverse to it. Even while observing that the law
of limitation would harshly affect the party, the Court felt
that the delay in the appeal filed by the State, should not
be condoned.
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
8. Regard should be had in similar such circumstances to
.
the impersonal nature of the Government’s functioning
where individual officers may fail to act responsibly. This
in turn, would result in injustice to the institutional interest
of the State. If the appeal filed by State are lost forindividual default, those who are at fault, will not usually
be individually affected”
Other than the aforesaid, it would also be appropriate to
refer to
judgment dated 09.10.2023, passed in Civil Appeal
No.5867 of 2015 titled Sheo Raj Singh (deceased) through
LRs. and others vs. Union of India and another. The relevant
extract of the same is being reproduced herein below:-.
“37. Having bestowed serious consideration to the rival
contentions, we feel that the High Court’s decision tocondone the delay on account of the first respondent’s
inability to present the appeal within time, for the reasons
assigned therein, does not suffer from any errorwarranting interference. As the aforementioned
judgments have shown, such an exercise of discretion
does, at times, call for a liberal and justice- oriented
approach by the Courts, where certain leeway could beprovided to the State. The hidden forces that are at work
in preventing an appeal by the State being presented
within the prescribed period of limitation so as not to allow
a higher court to pronounce upon the legality and validity
of an order of a lower court and thereby secure unholy
gains, can hardly be ignored. Impediments in the working
of the grand scheme of governmental functions have to
be removed by taking a pragmatic view on balancing ofthe competing interests.”
Hence, for the reasons/sufficient cause stated in the
application & the aforesaid position of law, delay in filing the
present appeal is condoned. The application stands disposed of.
RFA No.______/2025 (Be registered)
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
.
Admitted on substantial questions of law No.2, 3 and 4,
formulated at Page-15 of the paper book.
Records be called for.
List for hearing in due course.
CMP No._____of 2025 ( Be registered)
During the pendency of the present appeal, operation
and execution of judgment/award dated 27.03.2024, passed by
learned District Judge, Bilaspur, H.P., in Civil Appeal No.5/13
of 2023, shall remain stayed, subject to depositing of the
compensation amount along-with up-to-date interest.
The application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 19, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
State of HP and others vs. Shree Ram (deceased)
through LRs.
CMP(M) No.169 of 2025
.
19.05.2025 Present: Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the applicants-appellants/State.
CMP(M) No.169 of 2025
Though served, no one has put in appearance on behalf of
the respondents. Hence, they are proceeded against ex parte.
In filing of the present appeal, there is a delay of 124 days.
The same has been duly explained in the application filed for
condonation of delay. Even otherwise, while dealing with an
application for condonation of delay filed by the State, one has to
be conscious of the bureaucratic delays, impersonal nature of the
governmental functioning, institutional interest and hence a
justice oriented liberal approach has to be taken while dealing
with such applications.
In this respect, it would be appropriate to refer to decision
of the Hon’ble Apex Court passed in State of Manipur and
others vs. Koting Lamkang, 2019 (10) SCC 408. The relevant
extract of the same is being reproduced herein below:-
“7. But while concluding as above, it was necessary for
the Court to also be conscious of the bureaucratic delay
and the slow pace in reaching a government decision and
the routine way of deciding whether the State should
prefer an appeal against a judgment adverse to it. Even
while observing that the law of limitation would harshly
affect the party, the Court felt that the delay in the appeal
filed by the State, should not be condoned. against a
judgment adverse to it. Even while observing that the law
of limitation would harshly affect the party, the Court felt
that the delay in the appeal filed by the State, should not
be condoned.
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
8. Regard should be had in similar such circumstances to
.
the impersonal nature of the Government’s functioning
where individual officers may fail to act responsibly. This
in turn, would result in injustice to the institutional interest
of the State. If the appeal filed by State are lost forindividual default, those who are at fault, will not usually
be individually affected”
Other than the aforesaid, it would also be appropriate to
refer to
judgment dated 09.10.2023, passed in Civil Appeal
No.5867 of 2015 titled Sheo Raj Singh (deceased) through
LRs. and others vs. Union of India and another. The relevant
extract of the same is being reproduced herein below:-.
“37. Having bestowed serious consideration to the rival
contentions, we feel that the High Court’s decision tocondone the delay on account of the first respondent’s
inability to present the appeal within time, for the reasons
assigned therein, does not suffer from any errorwarranting interference. As the aforementioned
judgments have shown, such an exercise of discretion
does, at times, call for a liberal and justice- oriented
approach by the Courts, where certain leeway could beprovided to the State. The hidden forces that are at work
in preventing an appeal by the State being presented
within the prescribed period of limitation so as not to allow
a higher court to pronounce upon the legality and validity
of an order of a lower court and thereby secure unholy
gains, can hardly be ignored. Impediments in the working
of the grand scheme of governmental functions have to
be removed by taking a pragmatic view on balancing ofthe competing interests.”
Hence, for the reasons/sufficient cause stated in the
application & the aforesaid position of law, delay in filing the
present appeal is condoned. The application stands disposed of.
RFA No.______/2025 (Be registered)
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
.
Admitted on substantial questions of law No.2, 3 and 4,
formulated at Page-15 of the paper book.
Records be called for.
List for hearing in due course.
CMP No._____of 2025 ( Be registered)
During the pendency of the present appeal, operation
and execution of judgment/award dated 27.03.2024, passed by
learned District Judge, Bilaspur, H.P., in Civil Appeal No.5/13
of 2023, shall remain stayed, subject to depositing of the
compensation amount along-with up-to-date interest.
The application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 19, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
State of HP and others vs. Ganga Ram
CMP(M) No.168 of 2025
.
19.05.2025 Present: Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the applicants-appellants/State.
CMP(M) No.168 of 2025
Though served, no one has put in appearance on behalf of
the respondent. Hence, he is proceeded against ex parte.
In filing of the present appeal, there is a delay of 124 days.
The same has been duly explained in the application filed for
condonation of delay. Even otherwise, while dealing with an
application for condonation of delay filed by the State, one has to
be conscious of the bureaucratic delays, impersonal nature of the
governmental functioning, institutional interest and hence a
justice oriented liberal approach has to be taken while dealing
with such applications.
In this respect, it would be appropriate to refer to decision
of the Hon’ble Apex Court passed in State of Manipur and
others vs. Koting Lamkang, 2019 (10) SCC 408. The relevant
extract of the same is being reproduced herein below:-
“7. But while concluding as above, it was necessary for
the Court to also be conscious of the bureaucratic delay
and the slow pace in reaching a government decision and
the routine way of deciding whether the State should
prefer an appeal against a judgment adverse to it. Even
while observing that the law of limitation would harshly
affect the party, the Court felt that the delay in the appeal
filed by the State, should not be condoned. against a
judgment adverse to it. Even while observing that the lawof limitation would harshly affect the party, the Court felt
that the delay in the appeal filed by the State, should not
be condoned.
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
8. Regard should be had in similar such circumstances to
the impersonal nature of the Government’s functioning.
where individual officers may fail to act responsibly. This
in turn, would result in injustice to the institutional interest
of the State. If the appeal filed by State are lost for
individual default, those who are at fault, will not usuallybe individually affected”
Other than the aforesaid, it would also be appropriate to
refer to judgment dated 09.10.2023, passed in Civil Appeal
No.5867 of 2015 titled Sheo Raj Singh (deceased) through
LRs. and others vs. Union of India and another. The relevant
extract of the same is being reproduced herein below:-.
“37. Having bestowed serious consideration to the rival
contentions, we feel that the High Court’s decision to
condone the delay on account of the first respondent’sinability to present the appeal within time, for the reasons
assigned therein, does not suffer from any error
warranting interference. As the aforementionedjudgments have shown, such an exercise of discretion
does, at times, call for a liberal and justice- orientedapproach by the Courts, where certain leeway could be
provided to the State. The hidden forces that are at workin preventing an appeal by the State being presented
within the prescribed period of limitation so as not to allow
a higher court to pronounce upon the legality and validity
of an order of a lower court and thereby secure unholy
gains, can hardly be ignored. Impediments in the working
of the grand scheme of governmental functions have to
be removed by taking a pragmatic view on balancing ofthe competing interests.”
Hence, for the reasons/sufficient cause stated in the
application & the aforesaid position of law, delay in filing the
present appeal is condoned. The application stands disposed of.
RFA No.______/2025 & CMP No._____2025
Be registered)
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the
respondent, returnable within four weeks.
.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 19, 2025 (KS) Judge
r to
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Nika Ram vs. State of HP and others
RFA No.31 of 2025
.
19.05.2025 Present: Mr. Mahesh Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondents/State.
CMP No.9806 of 2025
Learned counsel for the applicant-appellant submits that
Court fee on the appeal preferred, in the case at hand, shall be
affixed/deposited within a period of four weeks from today. In
view thereof, present application stands disposed of.
CMP No.4032 of 2025
In view of the fact that the appeal has been admitted,
present application has become infructuous. The same stands
accordingly disposed of.
CMP No.8731 of 2025
Allowed. The supplementary affidavit appended along-with
present application is taken on record. The application stands
disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 19, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
State of HP and others vs. Paras Ram and another
RSA No.282 of 2024
.
13.05.2025 Present: Mr. Manish Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for the
appellants/State.
Mr. Manish Kumar Gupta, Advocate, for the
respondents.
At the request of learned Deputy Advocate General,
list after six weeks.
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
May 13, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Kunta Devi and another vs. Sant Ram
RSA No.278 of 2024
.
13.05.2025 Present: Mr. J.R. Poswal, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Bhender Kumar, Advocate, for the respondent.
Interim order dated 03.01.2025 is stated to have been
complied with by the appellants on 09.05.2025. It is made
appellants
03.01.2025.
r shall to
clear that during the pendency of the present appeal,
keep complying with order dated
Admitted on the substantial question of law No.2,
formulated at Page-10 of the paper book.
Records be called for.
List for hearing in due course.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 13, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Ganga Ram vs. Shyam Sunder
RSA No.224 of 2024
.
13.05.2025 Present: Mr. Dibender Ghosh, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Jeevesh Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Himanshu
Panwar, Advocate, for the respondent.
RSA No.224 of 2024
Admitted on the substantial questions of law No.2
and 5, formulated at Pages-14 & 15 of the paper book.
Records be called for.
List for hearing in due course.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 13, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Govind Ram and others vs. Neela Devi and others
RSA No.209 of 2024
.
13.05.2025 Present: Mr. Sanjeev Kuthiala, Senior Advocate with Ms. Amita
Chandel, Advocate, for the appellants.
Ms. Kusum Chaudhary, Advocate, for the
respondents.
Learned counsel for the respondent seeks time to
inspect the record.
weeks.
r to
Prayer not opposed. List after four
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 13, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Brahamadatt vs. Suresh Chand and others
RSA No.164 of 2024
.
13.05.2025 Present: Mr. Surya Chauhan, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Surinder Saklani, Advocate, for the respondents.
CMP No.10053 of 2024
Time to file reply is sought since 04.09.2024.
However, the same has not been filed till date. Let the same
be positively filed on or before the next date of hearing.
However, it is made clear that if reply is not filed on or
before the next date of hearing, then the right to file the
same shall stand closed without further reference to this
Court.
Interim order to continue.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 13, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Kamla Devi vs. Sheela Devi and others
RSA No.181 of 2024
.
13.05.2025 Present: Mr. H.S. Rangra, Advocate, for the appellant.
Ms Aakreen Kaushal, Advocate, vice Mr. Vishwa
Bhushan, Advocate, for the respondents.
Further time prayed to inspect the record. Let the
needful be done within four weeks. List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 13, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Ashwani Kumar and others vs. Vidya Devi
RSA No.46 of 2024
.
13.05.2025 Present: Mr. Romesh Verma, Senior Advocate with Mr.
Digvijay Singh, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. K.D. Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Het Ram
Thakur, Advocate, for the respondent.
At the request of learned counsel for the appellant, list
after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 13, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Shiv Pal vs. Dayal Devi and another
CMPMO No.32 of 2024
.
13.05.2025 Present: Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate with Ms. Rinki
Kashmiri, Advocate, for the respondents.
List after four weeks.
May 13, 2025 (KS)
to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
NTPCL vs. Lachhami and others
Civil Revision No.28 of 2024
.
13.05.2025 Present: Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate with Ms. Rinki
Kashmiri, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Respondents No.1 and 2 proceeded against ex parte
vide order dated 24.05.2024.
Mr. Hamender Singh Chandel, Advocate, for
respondents No.3 to 7, 8(a) to 8(c).
Mr. Manish Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for
respondent No.9/State.
As jointly payed, list after six weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 13, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Vinod Kumar vs. State of HP and others
RFA No.7 of 2024
.
13.05.2025 Present: Mr. Sudhir Thakur, Senior Advocate with Mr. Somesh
Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Manish Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for the
respondents/State.
RFA No.7 of 2024
Admit.
List for hearing in due course.
CMP No.2560 of 2024
Pleadings be completed in the meanwhile. Since it is
an application under Order 41 Rule 27 of the Civil Procedure
Code, the same shall be heard along-with the appeal at the
time of final hearing.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 13, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Municipal Corporation, Shimla vs. Mukesh
Mahajan and another
CMPMO No.474 of 2023
.
13.05.2025 Present: Mr. Mukul Sood, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Rajeev Sood, Advocate, for the respondents.
At the request of learned counsel for the respondents,
list after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 13, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Lachhman @ Lachhmi Nand and others vs.
Munshi and others
RSA No.284 of 2023
.
13.05.2025 Present: Mr. Pankaj Thakur, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Sanjeev Kuthiala, Senior Advocate with Ms. Amita
Chandel, Advocate, for respondents No.1, 3, 5(ii),
5(iii), 6 to 12, 14, 15(i), 15(ii) and 18(ii).
Mr. Naresh K. Sharma, Advocate, for respondents
No.23, 24, 25(i), 25(ii).
Further time prayed on behalf of the parties to inspect
the record. List after six weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 13, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Rakesh Kumar vs. State of H.P.
Cr.MP(M) No.803 of 2025
.
13.05.2025 Present: Mr. Ajay Sipahiya, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondent/State.
Inspector Hans Raj, SH.O., Police Station, Sadar
Solan, District District Solan, Himachal Pradesh, is present
along with record.
Status report stands filed. The same is taken on
record. Copy, whereof, has been supplied to learned
counsel for the petitioner, who intends to go through the
same.
List for consideration on 04.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 13, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
State of HP and others vs. Balraj Singh and
another a/w connected matter
RSA No.219 of 2023 a/w
.
RSA No.75 of 2024
RSA No.219 of 2023
13.05.2025 Present: Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate
General, for the appellants.
Mr. Vikrant Chandel, Advocate, for the respondents.
RSA No.75 of 2024
Mr. Sumit Raj Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Vikrant Chandel, Advocate, for respondents No.1
& 2.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate
General, for respondents No.3 & 4.
CMP No.14306 of 2023 & CMP No.24978 of 2024 in
RSA No.219 of 2023
Reply be filed within four weeks. List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 13, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Beli Ram vs. Rachna and another
RSA No.200 of 2023
.
13.05.2025 Present: Mr. Vishwas Kaushal, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. R.K. Sharma, Senior Advocate with Ms. Anita,
Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Respondent No.2 proceeded against ex parte vide
order dated 22.05.2023 passed by Additional
Registrar (Judicial).
r to
Further time prayed to file certified copy of the trial
Court judgment and power of attorney. Let the needful be
done within three weeks. List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 13, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Lt. Joginder Singh (deceased) through LRs. vs.
Rajesh Sood
RSA No.119 of 2023
.
13.05.2025 Present: Mr. Umesh Kanwar, Advocate, for the appellants.
Ms. Vandana Kumar, Advocate, vice Mr. Sanjay
Jaswal, Advocate, for the respondent.
Further time payed to inspect the record. Let the
r to
needful be done within six weeks. List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 13, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
HPTDC vs. Regional Provident Fund
Commissioner of India and others
RSA No.90 of 2023
.
13.05.2025 Present: Mr. Shivank Singh Panta, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Rahul Mahajan, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Vivek Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.2(a)
to 2(c).
Parties to address on the issue of maintainability of
the suit, in the case at hand, before the Civil Court in view of
the provisions of Provident Funds Act.
List after six weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 13, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Hoshiar Singh vs. Harvinder Singh and others
RSA No.88 of 2023
.
13.05.2025 Present: Mr. Malay Kaushal, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Gurdev Negi, Advocate, for the respondents.
As jointly prayed, list after six weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 13, 2025 (KS)
r Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Tilak Raj vs. Bachitar Singh and another
RSA No.69 of 2023
.
13.05.2025 Present: Mr. P.S. Goverdhan, Senior Advocate with Mr.
Rakesh Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. R.S. Gautam, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sahil
Dixit, Advocate, for the respondents.
Power of attorney(s) stand filed on behalf of the
appellant and the respondents.
As prayed, list after six weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 13, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Jagjit Singh vs. Mohan Singh and others
RSA No.44 of 2023
.
13.05.2025 Present: Mr. Parveen Chauhan, Advocate, vice Mr. Y.P. Sood,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Aman Hansretta, Advocate, vice Mr. Vivek Negi,
Advocate, for respondent No.1.
None for respondents No.2 to 5.
r to
As jointly prayed, list after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 13, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Savitri Devi vs. Sharif Mohammad
CMPMO No.555 of 2022
.
13.05.2025 Present: Mr. Yuyutsu Singh Thakur, Advocate, for the
petitioner.
Ms. Vandana Kumari, Advocate, vice Mr. Surinder
Saklani, Advocate, for the respondent.
As jointly prayed, list on 03.06.2025.
May 13, 2025 (KS)
to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Jagdish Ram and others vs. Subhash Chand and
others
RSA No.10 of 2020
.
13.05.2025 Present: Mr. Vivek Singh Attri, Advocate, for the appellants.
None for respondents No.1, 2(a) to 2(d), 3 and 5.
Mr. Manish Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for
respondent No.4/State.
list on 20.05.2025.
r to
At the request of learned counsel for the appellants,
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 13, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Sanjeev Kumar Sharma and another vs. Suman
Sharma and others
Civil Revision No.10 of 2020
.
13.05.2025 Present: Mr. G.C. Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Deepak
Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Sumit Sood, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 3.
Name of respondent No.4 is deleted vide order dated
16.12.2021.
r to
Proforma respondent No.6 is stated to have expired.
Proforma respondent No.6, who is the son of the
original tenant, late Shri Achroo Ram, is stated to have died.
In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, learned
counsel for the respondents has drawn attention of this
Court to order dated 16.12.2021, whereby an application
under Order 1 Rule 10 of the Civil Procedure Code had
been filed for deletion of name of wife of late Shri Achroo
Ram (original tenant) on her death.
In the aforesaid facts and attending circumstances,
learned counsel for the petitioners seeks time for filing an
appropriate application under Order 1 Rule 10 of the Civil
Procedure Code for deletion of name of proforma
respondent No.6.
Let the needful be done within six weeks. List
thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 13, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Kasturi Devi (deceased) through LRs. and another
vs. Rajeev Sharma and others
Civil Revision No.193 of 2015
.
13.05.2025 Present: Mr. G.C. Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Deepak
Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Sumit Sood, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate with Ms. Rinki
Kashmiri, Advocate, for respondents No.2 and 3.
CMP No.23738 of 2024
r to
Learned counsel for respondents No.2 and 3 submits
that reply on their behalf shall be filed during the course of
the day. No rejoinder thereto is intended to be filed on
behalf of the applicant.
List for consideration on 22.05.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 13, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
M/s Nawal Kishore & sons vs. Executive Engineer,
HPPWD
Arbitration No.1 of 2018
.
09.05.2025 Present: Mr. Vishwas Kaushal, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondent/State.
In terms of Sections 2(i)(c)(vi) of the Commercial Courts
Act, 2015, the dispute in the case at hand pertains to a
commercial dispute. Therefore, in view of Sections 6 and 10(2) of
the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, list the matter before the
Commercial Division Bench.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 09, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
G.M. Northern Railways vs. Bachitter Singh and
others
CMP(M) No.170 of 2022
.
09.05.2025 Present: Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Senior Panel Counsel, for the
applicant/appellant.
Respondent No.1(a) is stated to have expired.
Mr. Gurinder Singh Parmar, Advocate, for
respondents No.1(b) to 1(d).
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondents No.2 and 3.
Steps for the service of proposed LRs. No.1(a)(i) to
1(a)(iii) be taken within one week. On taking such steps,
issue notice to the said proposed legal heirs, returnable
within four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 09, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Cantonment Board Kasauli vs. Rajesh Kapoor and
another
CMP No.2974 of 2020 in
.
RSA No.642 of 2008
09.05.2025 Present: Mr. Lokendar Pal Thakur, Senior Panel Counsel, for
the applicant.
Mr. K.D. Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vivek Singh
Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.1/ non-applicant.
Previously also,
to vide order dated
respondent No.2 had been served by way of affixation.
r 01.04.2023,
In the aforesaid backdrop, learned counsel appearing
on behalf of the applicant/appellant submits that another
application for effecting service of respondent No.2 by way
of affixation has been filed. However, the same is not on
record.
Registry to trace the application so filed and place it
on record well before the next date of hearing, post removal
of objection(s), if any.
List after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 09, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Bhanu Dutt vs. Municipal Corporation, Shimla and
another
CMPMO No.414 of 2016
.
09.05.2025 Present: Mr. Sumit Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. B.C. Verma,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Hamender Singh Chandel, Advocate, for
respondent No.1.
Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
CMP No.9924 of 2025
r to
For the reasons stated in the application, early
hearing of the petition is allowed. The application stands
disposed of.
CMPMO No.414 of 2016
List for consideration on 24.06.2025. Parties are free
to inspect the record prior to the next date of hearing.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 09, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
State of Himachal Pradesh and others vs. Shyam
Dutt and others
RFA No.181 of 2016
.
09.05.2025 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
appellants/State.
Mr. Pawan K. Sharma, Advocate, for respondents
No.1 to 4, 5(a) to 5(d), 7(a) to 7(3), 8, 10 to 13.
Mr. Ashok K. Tyagi, Advocate, for respondents
No.9(a) & 9(b).
Mr. Nitin Soni and Mr. Sunil Gautam, Advocates, for
respondents No.6(a) to 6(j).
CMP No.5691 of 2024
By virtue of order dated 19.10.2016 passed in
CMP(M) Nos.811 and 810 of 2015, legal heirs of deceased
respondent No.6-Vidya Dutt had been ordered to be brought
on record.
In fact, vide the said order, only one legal heir, i.e.,
Sushil Dutt had been brought on record along-with his wife
and two daughters. However, from the present application it
transpires that other than Sushil Dutt, there are nine other
legal heirs also, detailed in Paragraph-7 of the present
application.
In view thereof, order dated 19.10.2016 is modified
and legal heirs detailed in Paragraph-7 of the application are
ordered to be brought on record.
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
The application stands disposed of. Amended memo
of parties filed along-with present application is ordered to
.
be taken on record.
RFA No.181 of 2016
Mr. Nitin Soni, learned Advocate, appears and waives
service of notice on behalf of the newly added respondents.
Let power of attorney be filed on or before the next date of
hearing.
Power of attorney on behalf of respondents No.9(a)
and 9(b) be filed in the meanwhile.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 09, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
General Manager, Northern Railway vs. Rattan
Chand and others a/w connected matter
RFA No.266 of 2014 a/w
.
RFA No.322 of 2015
09.05.2025 Present: Mr. Nand Lal Thakur, Senior Panel Counsel, for the
appellant(s), in both the appeals.
Respondent No.1 is stated to have expired.
Ms Kavita Kajal, Advocate, vice Mr. Atharv Sharma,
Advocate, for respondents No.2 and 3 in RFA No.266
of 2014 and for respondents No.2, 4 and 5 in RFA
No.322 of 2015.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondents/State, in both the appeals.
Further time prayed for filing power of attorney on
behalf of respondents No.2 and 3. Let the needful be done
within four weeks. List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 09, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Jeet Ram vs. Lajwanti and others
RSA No.4143 of 2013
.
09.05.2025 Present: Mr. Sumit Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. J.N. Kenan, Advocate, vice Mr. Tek Chand
Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.1(a) to 1(e).
None for remaining respondents.
CMP No.9636 of 2025
The present application is dismissed as withdrawn
with liberty to file a fresh appropriate application.
RSA No.4143 of 2013
In terms of order dated 10.04.2025, let steps for the
service of respondent No.13 (post admission) be taken
within one week. On taking such steps, let notice be issued
to the said respondent, returnable for 23.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 09, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Shiv Giri (deceased) & others vs. Shiv Mandi Sudhar
Sabha and others a/w connected matters.
RSA No.39 of 2008 a/w CMPMO No.303 of 2021 and
.
CMP No.14303 of 2021
RSA No.39 of 2008
09.05.2025 Present: Mr. Hemant Kumar Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. Aman
Sood, Advocate, for the applicant-Mehant Mangal Giri
(applicant in CMP(M) No.850 of 2020).
Ms. Meera Devi, Advocate, vice Mr. Deepak Gupta,
Advocate, for the applicant in CMP(M) No.183 of
2021.
Mr. Rohit, Advocate, vice Mr. Sumit Sood, Advocate,
for respondents No.1 and 2.
None for respondent No.3.
Mr. Rahul, Advocate, vice Mr. Vivek Sharma,
Advocate, for respondent No.4.
CMPMO No.303 of 2021
Mr. Hemant Kumar Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. Aman
Sood, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ajeet Pal
Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Ranbir Singh, Advocate, vice Mr. L.S. Mehta,
Advocate, for respondents No.2 to 8.
CMP No.14303 of 2021
Mr. Hemant Kumar Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. Aman
Sood, Advocate, for the applicant.
Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ajeet Pal
Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Ranbir Singh, Advocate, vice Mr. L.S. Mehta,
Advocate, for respondents No.2 to 8.
RSA No.39 of 2008
An application is stated to have been filed under
under Order 1 Rule 10 of the Civil Procedure Code.
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
However, the same is not on record. Objection(s), if any be
.
removed and the same be placed on record well before the
next date of hearing.
CMP(M) No.216 of 2023 in CMPMO No.303 of 2021
Rejoinder, if any to the reply filed on behalf of
respondent No.3 be filed within two weeks. List thereafter.
May 09, 2025 (KS)
to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Laxmi and others vs. Rup Devi @ Rupi Devi and
others
RFA No.301 of 2004
.
09.05.2025 Present: Mr. Vaibhav Kanwar, Advocate, vice Mr. Karan Singh
Kanwar, Advocate, for appellant No.2 and for
proposed LR No.1(b)/legal heir of deceased appellant
No.1.
Appellant No.3 is stated to have expired.
Proposed LRs. No.1(a), 1(c), 1(d), 1(f) and 1(g)/legal
heirs of deceased appellant No.1 proceeded against
ex parte vide order dated 03.10.2024.
Mr. Abhishek and Ms. Sana Rana, Advocates, vice
Ms. Rachna Kuthiala, Advocate, for respondent No.1,
respondents No.2(a) to 2(d).
Respondents No.3 to 10 already expired.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
appellants submits that steps for the service of LR No.A-1(e)
have been taken yesterday, i.e., 08.05.2025. If so, let
notice be issued to the said proposed legal heir, returnable
within four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 09, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Ashok Kumar Rastogi vs. M/s Mahabir Polymers
and another
RFA No.22 of 2025
.
09.05.2025 Present: Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ajeet Pal
Singh, Advocate, for the appellant.
Respondent No.2 though served, however, there is no
appearance on his behalf. Hence, he is proceeded against
ex parte.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant
submits that fresh steps for the service of respondent No.1,
by way of filing their correct address shall be taken within
one week. On taking such steps, issue notice to the said
respondent, returnable within four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 09, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
G.M. Renukaji Project and another vs. Yogeshwar
Singh and others
CMP No.9261 of 2025 in
.
RFA No.76 of 2018
08.05.2025 Present: Ms. Sana Rana, Proxy Counsel, for the appellant-non
applicant.
Mr. Dhananjay Sharma, Advocate, for the applicants.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondent/State.
CMP No.9261 of 2025
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicants. The non-applicants have no objection, if in case
the amount lying deposited in this Registry of this Court
along-with proportionate interest accrued thereupon,
is released in favour of the applicant as is being sought in
the application.
The judgment, in the case at hand, was passed by
this Court on 11.06.2024. Learned counsel for the parties
submit that no further proceedings against the said decision
are pending before the Hon’ble Apex Court.
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is
allowed. The amount lying deposited in the Registry of this
Court along-with proportionate interest accrued thereupon is
ordered to be released in favour of the applicants in terms of
their shares. The amount be remitted to the bank accounts,
details whereof, have been given in Paragraph-5 of the
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
application, subject to proper verification. The application
.
stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 08, 2025 (KS) Judge
r to
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Prem Lata vs. Bimla Devi
Criminal Revision No.159 of 2024
.
08.05.2025 Present: Ms. Sana Rana, Proxy Counsel, for the petitioner.
Ms. Ranjana Sharma, Proxy Counsel, for the
respondent.
Cr.MP No.1504 of 2025
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is
allowed. Time for depositing the compounding fee, in terms
of judgment dated 05.11.2024, is extended by two weeks
from today, i.e., 08.05.2025. The application stands
disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 08, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Ishwar Kumar vs. Vikas Sudan and another
Civil Revision No.156 of 2024
.
08.05.2025 Present: Ms. Sana Rana, Proxy Counsel, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.2/State.
Respondent No.1 is stated to have expired.
CMP(M) No.656 of 2025
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the
proposed legal heirs of deceased respondent No.1, details
whereof have been given in Paragraph-2 of the application,
returnable within four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 08, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Collector Land Acquisition, HPPWD and another
vs. Dharam Chand
CMP(M) No.642 of 2025
.
08.05.2025 Present: Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for
the applicants-appellants.
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the
respondent, returnable within four weeks.
May 08, 2025 (KS)
to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Collector Land Acquisition, HPPWD and another
vs. Gurdial Singh
CMP(M) No.648 of 2025
.
08.05.2025 Present: Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for
the applicants-appellants.
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the
respondent, returnable within four weeks.
May 08, 2025 (KS)
to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Collector Land Acquisition, HPPWD and another
vs. Dhirju @ Manshu (since deceased) through LR
and another
.
CMP(M) No.647 of 2025
08.05.2025 Present: Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for
the applicants-appellants.
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the
respondents, returnable within four weeks.
r ( Bipin C. Negi )
May 08, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Collector Land Acquisition, HPPWD and another
vs. Dhirju @ Manshu (since deceased) through LR
and another
.
CMP(M) No.646 of 2025
08.05.2025 Present: Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for
the applicants-appellants.
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the
respondents, returnable within four weeks.
r ( Bipin C. Negi )
May 08, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Collector Land Acquisition, HPPWD and another
vs. Kuldeep Singh and others
CMP(M) No.645 of 2025
.
08.05.2025 Present: Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for
the applicants-appellants.
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the
respondents, returnable within four weeks.
May 08, 2025 (KS)
to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Collector Land Acquisition, HPPWD and another
vs. Dayak Ram @ Kahnu
CMP(M) No.644 of 2025
.
08.05.2025 Present: Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for
the applicants-appellants.
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the
respondent, returnable within four weeks.
May 08, 2025 (KS)
to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
Collector Land Acquisition, HPPWD and another
vs. Teku @ Tikam Ram and another
CMP(M) No.643 of 2025
.
08.05.2025 Present: Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for
the applicants-appellants.
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the
respondents, returnable within four weeks.
May 08, 2025 (KS)
to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
State of HP and others vs. Satya Pal
CMP(M) No.651 of 2025
.
08.05.2025 Present: Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for
the applicants-appellants.
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the
respondents, returnable within four weeks.
May 08, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:36 :::CIS
The State of HP and others vs. Lal Singh
(deceased) through LRs. and others
CMP(M) No.649 of 2025
.
08.05.2025 Present: Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for
the applicants-appellants.
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the
respondents, returnable within four weeks.
May 08, 2025 (KS)
to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Yuvraj Kumar vs. State of HP
Cr.MP(M) No.599 of 2025
.
08.05.2025 Present: Ms. Sana Rana, Proxy Counsel, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondent/State.
L/ASI Kamlesh Thakur, Women Police Station, Baddi,
Police District Baddi, District Solan, Himachal Pradesh, is
present along with record.
Status report stands filed. The same is taken on
record. Copy, whereof, has been supplied to learned
counsel for the petitioner, who intends to go through the
same.
List for consideration on 26.05.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 08, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Jai Kumar vs. HRTC and another
Execution Petition No.138 of 2025
.
08.05.2025 Present: Ms. Sana Rana, Proxy Counsel, for the petitioner.
Ms. Ranjana Sharma, Proxy Counsel, for the
respondents.
Reply/instructions be filed/obtained on or before the
next date of hearing. List on 03.06.2025.
r ( Bipin C. Negi )
May 08, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Hira Lal vs. HRTC and another
Execution Petition No.62 of 2025
.
08.05.2025 Present: Ms. Sana Rana, Proxy Counsel, for the petitioner.
Ms. Ranjana Sharma, Proxy Counsel, for the
respondents.
Reply/instructions be filed/obtained on or before the
next date of hearing. List on 03.06.2025.
r ( Bipin C. Negi )
May 08, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Bhadru @ Bhadar Singh vs. Union of India and
others
OMP(M) No.36 of 2025
.
08.05.2025 Present: Ms. Sana Rana, Proxy Counsel, for the applicants-
appellant.
Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Senior Panel Counsel, for
respondent No.1/Union of India.
Ms. Ranjana Sharma, Proxy Counsel, for respondents
No.2 and 3.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.4/State.
Further time prayed for filing reply. Let the needful be
done within four weeks. List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 08, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Makbul and others vs. Union of India and others
OMP(M) No.37 of 2025
.
08.05.2025 Present: Ms. Sana Rana, Proxy Counsel, for the applicants-
appellant.
Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Senior Panel Counsel, for
respondent No.1/Union of India.
Ms. Ranjana Sharma, Proxy Counsel, for respondents
No.2 and 3.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.4/State.
Further time prayed for filing reply. Let the needful be
done within four weeks. List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 08, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Dalip Singh @ Dalip vs. Ram Chand (deceased)
through LRs.
RSA No.19 of 2011
.
08.05.2025 Present: Ms. Sana Rana, Proxy Counsel, for the appellant.
Name of respondent No.1 stands deleted vide order
dated 25.02.2014.
Appeal against respondent No.2 has been ordered to
be abated vide order dated 16.10.2024.
No.2 and 4.
r to
Ms. Ranjana Sharma, Proxy Counsel, for respondents
CMP No.9440 of 2024
As jointly prayed, list after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 08, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Dr. Susheel Kumar Negi vs. Dr. Sudesh
CMPMO No.628 of 2024
.
08.05.2025 Present: Ms. Sana Rana, Proxy Counsel, for the petitioner.
Ms. Ranjana Sharma, Proxy Counsel, for the
respondent.
CMP No.9798 of 2025
Reply, if any, be filed on or before the next date of
hearing. List on 26.05.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 08, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Desh Raj vs. HRTC and another
Execution Petition No.348 of 2024
.
08.05.2025 Present: Ms. Sana Rana, Proxy Counsel, for the petitioner.
Ms. Ranjana Sharma, Proxy Counsel, for the
respondents.
As jointly prayed, list on 03.06.2025.
May 08, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
NHAI vs. Hari Singh and others
Arbitration Appeal No.28 of 2024
.
07.05.2025 Present: Ms. Sneh Bhimta, Advocate, vice Ms. Shreya
Chauhan, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Suneet Verma, Advocate, vice Mr. Varun Rana,
Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 7 and 10.
Respondents No.8 and 9 are stated to have expired.
r to
OMP(M) No.322 & 323 of 2024
Though served, none of the legal heirs of deceased
respondent No.8 have put in appearance.
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicants. The non-applicants have no objection, if in case,
the applications are allowed and the legal heirs of deceased
respondent No.8, are brought on record as is being sought
in the application (OMP(M) No.322 of 2024).
Respondent No.8 is stated to have expired on
27.11.2023. The same is evident from the Legal Heir
Certificate appended along with the application (OMP(M)
No.322 of 2024) as Annexure A-1. Deceased respondent
No.8 is survived by her legal heirs, details whereof, have
been given in Paragraph-3 of the application (OMP(M)
No.322 of 2024).
Since the right to sue inheres/survives with the legal
heirs of deceased respondent No.8, details whereof, have
been given in Paragraph-3 of the application (OMP(M)
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
No.322 of 2024), therefore, they are ordered to be brought
.
on record.
For the bona fide reasons stated/sufficient cause
shown in the application (OMP(M) No.323 of 2024), delay in
bringing on record the legal heirs of deceased respondent
No.8, is condoned and abatement, if any, is set aside.
The applications stand disposed of.
OMP(M) No.324 & 325 of 2024
Though served, none of the legal heirs of deceased
respondent No.9 have put in appearance.
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicants. The non-applicants have no objection, if in case,
the applications are allowed and the legal heirs of deceased
respondent No.9, are brought on record as is being sought
in the application (OMP(M) No.324 of 2024).
Respondent No.9 is stated to have expired on
08.06.2020. The same is evident from the Legal Heir
Certificate appended along with the application (OMP(M)
No.324 of 2024) as Annexure A-3. Deceased respondent
No.9 is survived by his legal heirs, details whereof, have
been given in Paragraph-3 of the application (OMP(M)
No.324 of 2024).
Since the right to sue inheres/survives with the legal
heirs of deceased respondent No.9, details whereof, have
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
been given in Paragraph-3 of the application (OMP(M)
.
No.324 of 2024), therefore, they are ordered to be brought
on record.
For the bona fide reasons stated/sufficient cause
shown in the application (OMP(M) No.325 of 2024), delay in
bringing on record the legal heirs of deceased respondent
No.9, is condoned and abatement, if any, is set aside.
The applications stand disposed of. Amended memo
of parties filed with the applications is ordered to be taken on
record.
Arbitration Appeal No.28 of 2024
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to
newly added respondents No.8(a) to (d) and 9(a) to 9(d),
returnable within four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 07, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Rattan Chand and another vs. Architect Planner,
M.C. Shimla and others
CMPMO No.24 of 2024
.
07.05.2025 Present: Mr. Sumit Sood, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Vivek Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.1
and 2.
Mr. Romesh Verma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sumit
Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
r to
Ms. Richa Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
As jointly prayed, list after six weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 07, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Dev Raj vs. Durga Dass and others
RSA No.16 of 2024
.
07.05.2025 Present: Mr. Saurav Rattan, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Sunny Modgill, Advocate, for respondent No.1,
through video conferencing.
None for respondents No.2 and 3.
Learned counsel for the parties submit that there is a
possibility of amicable settlement between the parties and
the matter be referred to the mediation.
On the request of learned counsel for the parties, the
matter is sent for mediation. With the consent of the learned
counsel for the parties, Mr. N.K. Sood, learned Senior
Advocate, is appointed as Mediator in this matter.
Learned counsel for the parties to appear before the
Mediator in the Main Mediation Centre, H.P. High Court, on
15.05.2025 at 11:00 a.m., who shall fix a date for presence
of parties thereafter. The official Coordinator, High Court
Main Mediation Centre shall render all assistance to learned
Mediator.
List the matter before the Court after receipt of report
of learned Mediator.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 07, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
M/s Som Nath Swaran Lal vs. Dr. Shashi Pal Sood
(deceased) through LRs.
.
Civil Revision No.07 of 2024
07.05.2025 Present: Mr. Shakti Bhardwaj, Advocate, vice Mr. Ravi Tanta,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Ajay Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. B. Nandan
Vashisht, Advocate, for the respondents.
Record stands received.
Learned counsel for the parties intend to go through
the same.
List for consideration after six weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 07, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Geeta Devi and others vs. Shiv Pal and others a/w
connected matters
.
RSA Nos.250 and 251 of 2023
07.05.2025 Present: Mr. H.S. Rangra, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. G.R. Palsra, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 7.
Learned counsel for the parties submit that an
amicable settlement is being worked out inter se the parties.
He prays for an adjournment. Prayer allowed.
List after six weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 07, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Mathru (deceased) through LRs. vs. Lalit Kumar and
others
RSA No.150 of 2023
.
07.05.2025 Present: Mr. G.R. Palsra, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Umesh Kanwar, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 5
and 7 to 11.
Record stands received.
Learned counsel for the parties intend to go through the
same. r
List for consideration after six weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 07, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Chuharu Ram vs. Dhani Devi (deceased) through LRs.
RSA No.64 of 2023
.
07.05.2025 Present: Mr. Shekhar Badola and Ms. Vishali Lakhanpal,
Advocates, vice Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Advocate, for the
appellant.
Mr. Vinod Kumar Gupta, Advocate, for the respondents.
Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant
r to
submits that the original counsel is unavailable today on account
of personal difficulty and prays for an adjournment.
allowed. List for consideration after four weeks.
Prayer
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 07, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Prakash Chand vs. Jeet Ram and others
RSA No.1 of 2022
.
07.05.2025 Present: Mr. Virender Singh Kanwar, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. A.K. Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
None for respondents No.2 to 8.
Further time sought by the counsel for the parties to
explore the possibility of amicable settlement between the parties,
by way of mediation. List after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 07, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Anil Verma vs. Asha Walia and others
Civil Revision No.43 of 2021
.
07.05.2025 Present: Mr. Sumit Sood, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Parmod Singh Thakur, Advocate, for respondents
No.1(a) to 1(d).
Mr. Vishal Singh Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents
No.1(a) to 1(d) submits that an application has been filed for
release of the amount deposited in the case at hand. However,
the same is not on record. Objection(s), if any be removed and
the same be placed on record well before the next date of
hearing.
List after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 07, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Umesh Sant and another vs. Manav Sant and another
RSA No.228 of 2020
.
07.05.2025 Present: Mr. Ashok Verma, Advocate, vice Mr. Karan Singh
Kanwar, Advocate, for appellants No.1 and 3.
Name of appellant No.2 deleted vide order dated
18.05.2023.
Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ajeet Pal
Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Respondent No.2 proceeded against ex parte vide order
dated 04.03.2021.
Further time prayed on behalf of the appellants to inspect
the record. Prayer allowed. List after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 07, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Gurmukh Singh vs. Manohar Lal Butail and another
CMPMO No.213 of 2018
.
07.05.2025 Present: Mr. Naresh Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Sumit Sood, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ajeet Pal
Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
At the joint request of learned counsel for the parties, list
on 19.05.2025.
r to
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 07, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Parkash Chand vs. Ajay Sharma and another a/w
connected matter
Civil Revision Nos.77 and 78 of 2025
.
07.05.2025 Present: Mr. G.C. Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Deepak Gupta,
Advocate, for the petitioner(s).
Mr. Sumit Sood, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Shekhar Badola and Ms. Vishali Lakhanpal,
Advocates, vice Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Advocate, for
respondents No.2.
on 20.05.2025.
At the joint request of learned counsel for the parties, list
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 07, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Rani Devi vs. Manoj Kumar
CMPMO No.136 of 2025
.
06.05.2025 Present: Mr. Jagmohan, Advocate, vice Ms. Prajwal Busta,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Surya Chauhan, Advocate, for the respondent.
CMPMO No.136 of 2025 & CMP No.6035 of 2025
Mr. Surya Chauhan, learned Advocate has put in
appearance on behalf of the respondent. He seeks time to file
power of attorney.
Let the needful be done within four weeks. List thereafter.
Reply, if any, be filed on or before the next date of hearing.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
State of HP and others vs. Parkash Chand
RSA No.56 of 2025
.
06.05.2025 Present: Mr. Manish Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for the
appellants/State.
Ms Tim Saran, Advocate, vice Mr. Pawan K. Sharma,
Advocate, for the respondent.
As jointly prayed, list in the first week of June, 2025.
May 06, 2025 (KS)
to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Jarnail Singh and others vs. Ramesh Chand
RSA No.62 of 2023
.
06.05.2025 Present: Mr. Ashok Kumar Tyagi, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Vinod Chauhan, Advocate, for the respondent.
Further time prayed on behalf of the counsel for the parties
to go through the records.
List after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Rajeev Sen and others vs. State of HP and others
RSA No.27 of 2025
.
06.05.2025 Present: Mr. Paras Dhaulta, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondents-State.
Certified copy of the trial Court judgment is stated to have
been filed. Let the same be placed on record, if in order.
List after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Vidya Devi and others vs. Ved Ram
CMPMO No.663 of 2024
.
06.05.2025 Present: Mr. Sunil Gautam, Advocate, vice Mr. Nitin Soni, Advocate,
for the petitioners.
Mr. Surya Chauhan, Advocate, for the respondent.
Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of the
petitioners submits that the original counsel is unavailable today
on account of personal difficulty and prays for an adjournment.
Prayer allowed. List for consideration after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Agya Ram vs. Kamla Devi and others
Civil Revision No.69 of 2018
.
06.05.2025 Present: Mr. Rajiv Rai, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Dinesh Bhanot, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Mukesh Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.3 to 8.
None for respondents No.2(a) to 2(e).
on 09.05.2025.
r to
At the joint request of learned counsel for the parties, list
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Vijay Singh vs. Anju Garg and another
RSA No.296 of 2024
.
06.05.2025 Present: Mr. Hitender Verma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Sunil Gautam, Advocate, vice Mr. Rahul Mahajan,
Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Respondent No.2 ex-parte vide order dated 07.03.2025.
As jointly prayed, list after two weeks.
May 06, 2025 (KS)
to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
State of HP and another vs. Raksha Devi and another
RSA No.267 of 2024
.
06.05.2025 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
appellants/State.
Mr. Kunal Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocate, vice Mr. Naresh Sharma,
Advocate, for respondent No.2.
same.
Record stands received.
Learned counsel for the parties intend to go through the
List for consideration on 21.05.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Ramesh Kumar vs. Jagdish Chand and others
RSA No.251 of 2024
.
06.05.2025 Present: Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Parveen Chandel, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to
4.
Record stands received.
Learned counsel for the parties intend to go through the
same. r
List for consideration after six weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Hiuen Dassi and another vs. Kali Dass and others
RSA No.226 of 2024
.
06.05.2025 Present: Mr. Bimal Gupta, Senior Advocate with Ms. Kusum
Chaudhary, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Karam Pal, Advocate, vice Mr. Mohar Singh, Advocate,
for respondent No.1.
Mr. Vishvinder Singh, Advocate, vice Mr. K.B. Khajuria,
Advocate, for respondents No.2 and 3.
Respondent No.4 is proceeded against ex parte vide order
dated 06.12.2024.
Learned counsel for the parties to ascertain, as to whether
there is a possibility of amicable settlement between the parties,
by way of mediation.
List after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Jiwan Lal vs. Daleep Kumar and another
RSA No.219 of 2024
.
06.05.2025 Present: Mr. Vijay Chaudhary, Advocate, for the appellant.
Ms. Anuja Mehta, Advocate, vice Mr. Gurmeet Bhardwaj,
Advocate, for the respondents.
Records of the Court below be called for. List after receipt
of the records.
May 06, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Naresh Kumar and another vs. Chandu (deceased)
through LRs.
.
RSA No.9 of 2021
06.05.2025 Present: Mr. Ashwani Kaundal, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocate, for respondents No.1, 5, 6,
8(a), 8(b), 12 to 14, 16 & 17.
RSA No.9 of 2021
At the request of learned counsel for the appellant, list for
consideration in the 3rd week of July, 2025.
CMP No.11929 of 2021
To be heard along-with the main appeal.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Devku and another vs. Lekh Ram
RSA No.119 of 2020
.
06.05.2025 Present: Mr. Bimal Gupta, Senior Advocate with Ms. Kusum
Chaudhary, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Romesh Verma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Digvijay
Singh, Advocate, for the respondent.
List for consideration in the 3rd week of July, 2025.
May 06, 2025 (KS)
to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Land Acquisition Collector and others vs. Sanjay and
another
.
RFA No.369 of 2019
06.05.2025 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
appellants/State.
Ms. Shashi Kiran, Advocate, vice Mr. Rupinder Singh,
Advocate, for respondents No.1 & 2.
Mr. P.S. Goverdhan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rakesh
Thakur, Advocate, for the applicant in CMP No.5598 and
5599 of 2024.
CMP No.5598 of 2024
In terms of order dated 26.03.2025, further time payed for
placing on record the copies of the relevant judgments and decrees.
Let the needful be done within four weeks. List thereafter.
CMP No.5599 of 2024
List for consideration along-with CMP No.5598 of 2024.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Neeraj Justa and others vs. State of HP and others
RFA No.125 of 2019
.
06.05.2025 Present: Ms. Seema K. Guleria, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondents No.1 & 2/State.
Respondents No.3(a) to 3(d) already ex parte.
Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate, vice Mr. Nishant Khidtta,
Advocate, for respondent No.21(a) to 21(d).
CMP No.7626 of 2022
Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the
pleadings. No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicants. The non-applicants have no objection, if in case the
present application is allowed and the name of deceased
respondent No.12-Amog Chand, is ordered to be deleted from the
array of the parties. Respondent No.12-Amog Chand is stated to
have expired on 08.03.2020. The said deceased is survived by two
sons, namely Pradeep and Rajiv, who are stated to be already on
record as respondents Nos.17 & 18.
In view of the aforesaid, since the right to sue survives in the
aforesaid legal heirs of deceased respondent No.12, therefore, the
application is allowed. Name of respondent No.12-Amog Chand, is
ordered to be deleted from the array of the respondents, subject to
just exceptions.
The application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
The Agriculture Service Co-operative Society vs.
Mohinder
RSA No.55 of 2024
.
06.05.2025 Present: Mr. Ashok Kumar Tyagi, Advocate, vice Mr. Naresh Kaul,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Basant Pal Thakur, Advocate, for proposed
LRs.No.1(a) to 1(d).
Mr. Basant Pal Thakur, learned counsel seeks time to
move an application for appointment of a Court Guardian in terms
of Order 32 of the Civil Procedure Code, insofar as proposed
LR.1(b) is concerned.
Let the needful be done within four weeks. List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Bodh Raj vs. Prem Chand and others
RSA No.161 of 2013
.
06.05.2025 Present: Mr. R.K. Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Arun Kumar,
Advocate, for the proposed LRs.1(a), 1(c) & 1(e).
Proposed LR.1(b) is stated to have expired.
Mr. Tarun Brakta, Advocate, vice Mr. Atharv Sharma,
Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 4.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.8-State.
None for the other respondents.
CMP(M) No.1563 & 1564 of 2024
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicants. The non-applicants have no objection, if in case, the
applications are allowed and the legal heirs of deceased sole
appellant-Bodh Raj are brought on record as is being sought in
the application (CMP(M) No.1563 of 2024).
Sole appellant-Bodh Raj is stated to have expired on
16.04.2018. The same is evident from the Death Certificate
appended along with the application (CMP(M) No.1563 of 2024)
as Annexure A-1. The deceased appellant is survived by his
legal heirs, details whereof, have been given in Paragraph-1 of
the application (CMP(M) No.1563 of 2024).
Since the right to sue inheres/survives with the legal heirs of
sole deceased appellant, details whereof, have been given in
Paragraph-1 of the application (CMP(M) No.1563 of 2024),
therefore, they are ordered to be brought on record.
For the bona fide reasons stated/sufficient cause shown in
the application (CMP(M) No.1564 of 2024), delay in bringing on
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
.
record the legal heirs of deceased sole appellant, is condoned
and abatement, if any, is set aside.
The applications stand disposed of.
CMP(M) No.573 of 2025
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the
proposed legal heirs of deceased respondent No.1, details
whereof have been given in Paragraph-3 of the application,
returnable within four weeks.
CMP(M) No.1377 & 1378 of 2024
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicants. The non-applicants have no objection, if in case, the
applications are allowed and the legal heirs of deceased
proposed LR-1(b)- Mahender Singh, are brought on record as is
being sought in the application (CMP(M) No.1377 of 2024).
The proposed LR-1(b)-Mahender Singh is stated to have
expired on 07.12.2020. The same is evident from the Death
Certificate appended along with the application (CMP(M) No.1377
of 2024) as Annexure A-1. The deceased proposed LR-1(b) is
survived by his legal heirs, details whereof, have been given in
Paragraph-3 of the application (CMP(M) No.1377 of 2024).
Since the right to sue inheres/survives with the legal heirs of
deceased proposed LR-1(b), details whereof, have been given in
Paragraph-3 of the application (CMP(M) No.1377 of 2024),
therefore, they are ordered to be brought on record.
For the bona fide reasons stated/sufficient cause shown in
the application (CMP(M) No.1378 of 2024), delay in bringing on
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
record the legal heirs of deceased proposed LR-1(b), is
.
condoned and abatement, if any, is set aside.
The applications stand disposed of.
Let power of attorney on behalf of the newly added
appellants and memo of appearance be filed within four weeks.
May 06, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Som Krishan and others vs. Tirath Ram (deceased)
through LRs. and others
RSA No.77 of 2013
.
06.05.2025 Present: Ms. Kusum Chaudhary, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. G.R. Palsra, Advocate, for respondents No.1(a) to
1(d).
Mr. Deepanshu, Advocate, vivce Mr. Het Ram Thakur,
Advocate, for respondents No.3(i) to 3(v).
r to
Mr. G.R. Palsra, learned counsel submits that in order
dated 04.10.2024, his presence has wrongly been marked for
respondents No.1(e)(i) and 1(e)(ii).. He seeks time to file an
appropriate application for rectification of the order.
Let the needful be done within four weeks. List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Gurbax Lal and others vs. Rakesh Raizada and others
RSA No.49 of 2013
.
06.05.2025 Present: Mr. Tarun Brakta, Advocate, vice Mr. Atharv Sharma,
Advocate, for appellants No.1, 2 & 3(a) to 3(d).
Mr. Lakshay Parihar, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 4
and 5(a) to 5(d).
Mr. N.K. Thakur, Senior Advocate with Mr. Divya Raj
Sngh, Advocate, for respondents No.13(a) to 13(d).
r to
Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of appellants
No.1, 2 & 3(a) to 3(d) submits that power of attorney on behalf of
the said appellants stand filed. However, learned counsel
appearing on behalf of respondents No.5(a) to 5(d) submits that
he has filed memo of appearance for today and power of attorney
on behalf of the said respondents shall be filed on or before the
next date of hearing.
Let the needful be done within four weeks. List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
State of Himachal Pradesh vs. Tula Ram (deceased)
through LRs. and others
RSA No.239 of 2012
.
06.05.2025 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
appellant/State.
Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocate, for respondents No.1(a),
1(b), 2(a), 2(b), 3 to 9, 10(a) to 10(d), 11 to 18, 20.
Mr. Rakesh Thakur, Advocate, for respondents No.21, 22,
24(a) to 24(e), 25, 26(a) to 26(g) & 30.
r to
CMP Nos.5760 & 5761 of 2015
No rejoinder to CMP No.5761 of 2015 is intended to be
filed on behalf of the applicant. Since the pleadings in the
applications are complete, therefore, list the same for
consideration after six weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Amin Chand vs. Jagat Ram (deceased) through LRs.
and others
RSA No.269 of 2009
.
06.05.2025 Present: Mr. Jai Ram Sharma, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Rahul Gathania, Advocate, vice Mr. Sanjeev Sood,
Advocate, for respondents No.1(a) to 1(e), 2(a) to 2(i), 3, 4
and 6.
None for respondent No.5.
Mr. Tarun Brakta, Advocate, vice Mr. Atharv Sharma,
Advocate, for respondents No.7 and 9 to 13.
Respondent No.8 is stated to have expired.
CMP Nos.18720 & 18721 of 2024
Further time prayed for filing reply. Let the needful be
done within four weeks. List thereafter.
RSA No.269 of 2009
Further time prayed for taking consequential steps for
bringing on record the legal heirs of deceased respondent No.8.
Be taken within four weeks.
CMP No.25582 of 2024
Reply, if any, be filed within four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Datta Ram (now deceased) through LRs. vs. Garib
Dass (deceased) through LRs. and others
RSA No.437 of 2008
.
06.05.2025 Present: Mr. Prantap Sharma, Advocate, for the appellants.
Name of respondent No.1(i) stands deleted.
Mr. N.K. Thakur, Senior Advocate with Mr. Divya Raj
Singh, Advocate, for respondents No.1(ii) and 1(iii).
None for respondents No.1(iv), 2(a) to 2(c), 3 to 5.
r to
Respondent No.6 is stated to have expired.
CMP(M) Nos.660 & 661 of 2025
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the
proposed legal heirs of deceased proforma respondent No.6,
details whereof have been given in Paragraph-3 of CMP(M)
No.660 of 2025, returnable within four weeks.
CMP No.14933 of 2022
Rejoinder, if any, be also filed on or before the next date of
hearing.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
NTPC Ltd. Kol Dam, Barmana vs. Durga Dass
(deceased) through LRs. and others
.
CMP No.9307 of 2025 in
RFA No.121 of 2014
05.05.2025 Present: Mr. K.B. Khajuria, Advocate, for the applicant-claimant.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for
respondents No.9 & 10/State.
Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Advocate, for the
respondent/applicant in CMP No.9307 of 2025.
CMP No.9307 of 2025
Applicant -Akashay Kumar, i.e., respondent No.1(e)(i),
respondent No.2(e)(i) and respondent No.4(a) are the same
person, i.e., Akashay Kumar. He was previously represented by
his mother, natural guardian. On attaining the age of majority, as
is evident from the Matriculation Certificate appended along with
present application, the application has been filed by said
Akashay Kumar for the discharge of the natural guardian, i.e. his
mother.
In view of the fact that Akashay Kumar has attained the
age of majority, the application is allowed. He is permitted to
pursue his matter in his own capacity. The mother/natural
guardian is discharged from defending the case on his behalf.
The application stands disposed of.
CMP No.9308 of 2025
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicants. The non-applicants have no objection, if in case the
amount lying deposited in this Registry of this Court along-with
proportionate interest accrued thereupon, is released in favour of the
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
applicant.
.
The appeal, in the case at hand, was decided on 22.06.2017.
It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
applicant that no further proceedings against the said decision are
pending before the Hon’ble Apex Court.
Other than the aforesaid, for the reasons stated in the
application, the same is allowed. Applicant-Akashay Kumar would
be entitled to compensation to the extent of 1/15 th share of Durga
Dass, 1/15th share of Gulaba and 1/3rd share of Shaleen. The
amount lying deposited in the Registry of this Court along-with
proportionate interest accrued thereupon is ordered to be released
in favour of the applicant in terms of the shares. The amount be
remitted to the bank account, details whereof, have been given in
Paragraph-3 of the application, subject to proper verification. The
application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 05, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Raghubir Singh vs. Vijay Kumar and others
Civil Revision No.169 of 2017
.
05.05.2025 Present: Ms. Devyani Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Shivam
Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Het Ram Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. Sanjeev Sood,
Advocate, for respondents No.1 & 2.
CMP(M) Nos.627 & 628 of 2025
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the
proposed legal heir of deceased respondent No.4, details
whereof, have been given in Paragraph-3 of the application
(CMP(M) No.627 of 2025), returnable within four weeks.
List after four weeks. Reply, if any, be filed by the non-
applicants in the meanwhile.
CMP No.9268 of 2025
Allowed and the applicant is exempted from filing English
translated copies of the documents, in question, annexed with the
accompanying petition, at this stage, subject to filing of the same
within seven days, as and when directed to do so. The application
stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 05, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Arjun Singh vs. Rajindera Kumari and others
RFA No.103 of 2002
.
05.05.2025 Present: Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Senior Advocate with Mr. Diwan Singh
Negi, Advocate, for the appellant.
None for respondents No.1 to 4.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.5/State.
Ms. Devyani Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Shivam
Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.6.
Further time prayed to inspect the record by learned
counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant.
List on 17.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 05, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Executive Engineer and another vs. Prem Lal
CMP No.9293 of 2025 in
RFA No.193 of 2014
.
05.05.2025 Present: Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
appellants/State/non-applicants.
Mr. Abhinav Mehta, Advocate, vice Mr. Amit Singh
Chandel, Advocate, for the respondent/applicant.
Since no amount stands deposited in the Registry of this
r to
Court, therefore, the present application is disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 05, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
The Land Acquisition Collector and another vs. Karam
Singh (deceased) through LRs.
.
CMP No.5152 of 2025 in
RFA No.179 of 2015
05.05.2025 Present: Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
appellants/State.
Mr. Surender Verma, Advocate, for the respondents/
applicants.
dated 27.03.2025.
r to
Further time prayed to do the needful, in terms of order
Let the needful be done within four weeks. List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 05, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Tikam Singh vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Cr.MP(M) No.755 of 2025
.
05.05.2025 Present: Mr. Ganesh Barowalia, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
H.C. Subhash Chand No.05, I/O Police Station, Shillai,
District Sirmour, Himachal Pradesh, is present along-with record.
Status report stands filed. The same is taken on record.
Copy, whereof, has been supplied to learned counsel for the
petitioner, who intends to go through the same.
List for consideration on 30.05.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 05, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Sukhdev vs. Abdul Hakim
CMP(M) No.575 of 2025
.
05.05.2025 Present: Ms. Aruna Chauhan, Advocate, for the applicant.
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the
respondent, returnable within four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 05, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Saroj Rani vs. State of HP and others
Execution Petition No.227 of 2025
.
05.05.2025 Present: Mr. Onkar Jairath, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondents/State.
Notice. Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, learned Additional Advocate
General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the
respondents and seeks time to file reply/instructions.
Reply/instructions be filed/obtained on or before the next
date of hearing. List on 05.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 05, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Bhagi Ram vs. State of HP and others
Execution Petition No.220 of 2025
.
05.05.2025 Present: Mr. Bonit Parkash, Advocate, vice Mr. A.K. Gupta,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondents/State.
Notice. Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, learned Additional Advocate
General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the
respondents and seeks time to file reply/instructions.
Reply/instructions be filed/obtained on or before the next
date of hearing. List on 05.06.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 05, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Land Acquisition Collector vs. Sushma Kumari and
others
.
CMP(M) No.370 of 2024
05.05.2025 Present: Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
applicants-appellants/State.
Mr. Divya Raj Singh, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 3
and 5.
Mr. Divya Raj Singh, learned counsel has put in
appearance on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3 and 5.
r He
submits that power of attorney would be filed within two weeks.
In the filing of the present appeal, there is a delay of 515
days. The same has been duly explained in the application filed
for condonation of delay. Even otherwise, while dealing with an
application for condonation of delay filed by the State, one has to
be conscious of the bureaucratic delays, impersonal nature of the
governmental functioning, institutional interest and hence a
justice oriented liberal approach has to be taken while dealing
with such applications.
In this respect, it would be appropriate to refer to decision
of the Hon’ble Apex Court passed in State of Manipur and
others vs. Koting Lamkang, 2019 (10) SCC 408. The relevant
extract of the same is being reproduced herein below:-
“7. But while concluding as above, it was necessary for
the Court to also be conscious of the bureaucratic delay
and the slow pace in reaching a government decision and
the routine way of deciding whether the State should
prefer an appeal against a judgment adverse to it. Even
while observing that the law of limitation would harshly
affect the party, the Court felt that the delay in the appeal
filed by the State, should not be condoned. against a
judgment adverse to it. Even while observing that the law::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
of limitation would harshly affect the party, the Court felt
that the delay in the appeal filed by the State, should not.
be condoned.
8. Regard should be had in similar such circumstances to
the impersonal nature of the Government’s functioning
where individual officers may fail to act responsibly. Thisin turn, would result in injustice to the institutional interest
of the State. If the appeal filed by State are lost for
individual default, those who are at fault, will not usually
be individually affected”
Other than the aforesaid, it would also be appropriate to
refer to judgment dated 09.10.2023, passed in Civil Appeal
No.5867 of 2015 titled Sheo Raj Singh (deceased) through
LRs. and others vs. Union of India and another. The relevant
extract of the same is being reproduced herein below:-.
“37. Having bestowed serious consideration to the rival
contentions, we feel that the High Court’s decision to
condone the delay on account of the first respondent’sinability to present the appeal within time, for the reasons
assigned therein, does not suffer from any errorwarranting interference. As the aforementioned
judgments have shown, such an exercise of discretiondoes, at times, call for a liberal and justice- oriented
approach by the Courts, where certain leeway could be
provided to the State. The hidden forces that are at work
in preventing an appeal by the State being presented
within the prescribed period of limitation so as not to allow
a higher court to pronounce upon the legality and validity
of an order of a lower court and thereby secure unholy
gains, can hardly be ignored. Impediments in the working
of the grand scheme of governmental functions have to
be removed by taking a pragmatic view on balancing ofthe competing interests.”
Hence, for the reasons/sufficient cause stated in the
application & the aforesaid position of law, delay in filing the
present appeal is condoned. The application stands disposed of.
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
RFA No.______/2025 (Be registered)
Admit.
.
Records be called for.
List for hearing in due course.
CMP No._____of 2025 ( Be registered)
During the pendency of the present appeal, operation and
execution of judgment/award dated 17.09.2022, passed by
learned Additional District Judge-III, Kangra at Dharamshala,
District Kangra, H.P., in RBT LAC No.07-D/19/13/12, shall remain
stayed, subject to depositing of the entire awarded amount along-
with up-to-date interest within a period of six weeks from today.
The application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 05, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Harginder Singh and another vs. Manjeet Kaur and
others
CMP(M) No.248 of 2024
.
05.05.2025 Present: Mr. Vinod Chauhan, Advocate, for the applicants.
Mr. Dibender Ghosh, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 4.
Ms. Devyani Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Shivam
Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.4A.
Name of respondent No.7 stands deleted vide order dated
15.10.2024.
Reply is stated to have been filed on behalf of the non-
applicant(respondent No.4A). The other non-applicants, i.e.
respondents No.1 to 4 adopt the reply so filed.
Rejoinder, if any, be filed within four weeks. List
thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 05, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Sahiboo Devi vs. Anand Kishore (deceased) through
LRs. and others
Civil Revision No.95 of 2024
.
05.05.2025 Present: Mr. Aishwary Chauhan, Advocate, vice Mr. Naresh
Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Parveen Chauhan, Advocate, vice Mr. Y.P. Sood,
Advocate, for the respondents.
Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner
submits that the zimini orders of the trial Court, in terms of order
dated 05.12.2024 could not be placed on record as they have
been misplaced in another file. He prays for and is granted four
weeks’ time to do the needful. List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 05, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
State of HP and another vs. Neeraj Justa and others
RFA No.50 of 2023
.
05.05.2025 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
appellants.
Ms. Seema Guleria, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 3.
Name of respondent No.22 deleted vide order dated
31.10.2023.
Respondents No.6, 8 to 12, 14, 16(a), 16(b), 17, 20, 21, 34
to 39 ex parte vide order dated 02.07.2024.
Proposed LRs. No.4(a) to 4(d) & respondents No. 5,
13(a), 13(b), 18, 19 and 25 ex parte vide order dated
04.04.2025.
Consequential steps for bringing on record the legal heirs
of deceased respondent No.7 be taken within six weeks. List
thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 05, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Muni Lal vs. Sita Devi and others
RSA No.34 of 2023
.
05.05.2025 Present: Mr. H.C. Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Ajeet Pal Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
None for respondents No.2 to 11, 14, 15, 17, 19 to 22, 24
to 28, 30 and 31.
CMP(M) No.1061 & 1062 of 2023
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the contesting
applicants.
Let Legal Heir Certificates of proforma deceased
respondents No.16 and 23 be filed within four weeks. List
thereafter.
CMP No.14795 of 2023
List the present application along-with aforesaid two
applications.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 05, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Muni Lal vs. Sita Devi and others
RSA No.34 of 2023
.
05.05.2025 Present: Mr. H.C. Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Ajeet Pal Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
None for respondents No.2 to 11, 14, 15, 17, 19 to 22, 24
to 28, 30 and 31.
CMP(M) No.1061 & 1062 of 2023
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the contesting
applicants.
Let Legal Heir Certificates of proforma deceased
respondents No.16 and 23 be filed within four weeks. List
thereafter.
CMP No.14795 of 2023
List the present application along-with aforesaid two
applications.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 05, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Inder Singh vs. HRTC and others
RSA No.33 of 2023
.
05.05.2025 Present: Mr. Devinder Chauhan Jaita, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Ajay Kumar Chauhan, Advocate, for respondents No.1
and 2.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.3/State.
Out of the same award, which is under challenge, there
exists another regular first appeal.
r The enhanced amount of
compensation sought to be released, in the case at hand, is
stated to have been deposited in the said other appeal, i.e., RFA
No.74 of 2020.
In view thereof, list along-with RFA No.74 of 2020, on
20.05.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 05, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Ganga Dutt (deceased) through LRs. and others
vs. Om Prakash and others
.
RSA No.22 of 2023
05.05.2025 Present: Mr. Karun Negi, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Rakesh Thakur, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 3,
4(g), 4(h), 5(a) to 5(c), 6(a), 7 to 11, 12(a) to 12(c), 13 and
14.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondents No.15 & 16/State.
RSA No.22 of 2023
Power of attorney on behalf of newly added respondents
No.2(a) to 2(f) and 9(a) to 9(d) is stated to have been filed.
CMP No.812 of 2023
Rejoinder, if any, be filed within six weeks. List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 05, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Chain Singh vs. Rai Singh and another
RSA No.216 of 2021
.
05.05.2025 Present: Mr. Naresh Kaul, Advocate, for the appellant.
None for respondent No.2.
Respondent No.1 is stated to have expired.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant
submits that an appropriate application for deletion of name
of deceased respondent No.1 shall be filed during the
course of the day itself.
List the matter after two weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 05, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Vijay Kumar Sood vs. Parkasho Devi and others
a/w connected matters
Civil Revision No.185 of 2018 a/w
.
Civil Revision No.216 of 2015, Civil Revision
Nos.58, 74 and 75 of 2016
Civil Revision No.185 of 2018, Civil Revision
No.216 of 2015 and Civil Revision No.58 of 2016
05.05.2025 Present: Mr. Rohit Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. Sumit Sood,
Advocate, for the petitioner(s).
Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 5.
Mr. Ashok Sood, Senior Advocate with Ms. Pooja
Verma, Advocate, for respondents No.6 to 8.
Civil Revision Nos.74 and 75 of 2016
Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner(s).
Mr. Rohit Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. Sumit Sood,
Advocate, for the respondent(s).
Mr. Ajay Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf
of respondents No.1 to 5, in Civil Revision No.185/2018
submits that power of attorney stands already filed on their
behalf.
Other than the aforesaid, learned counsel appearing
on behalf of respondents No.1 to 5, in Civil Revision
Nos.216 of 2015 and Civil Revision No.58 of 2016 submits
that power of attorney on behalf of the said respondents
shall be filed during the course of the day.
The respondents in the aforesaid revisions are the
petitioners in Civil Revision Nos.74 and 75 of 2016. Learned
counsel submits that power of attorney on behalf of the
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
petitioner(s), shall be filed on or before the next date of
.
hearing.
List after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 05, 2025 (KS) Judge
r to
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Heera Singh vs. Raj Rani and others
CMPMO No.567 of 2019
.
11.04.2025 Present: Ms. Sana, Advocate, vice Ms. Rachna Kuthiala, Advocate,
for the petitioner.
Ms Kiran Thapar, Advocate, vice Mr. Saurav Rattan,
Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocate, vice Mr. Karan Singh
Kanwar, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
CMP No.19853 of 2023
Further time prayed for doing the needful in terms of order
dated 28.03.2025. Let the needful be done within four weeks.
List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 11, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Gopal Sood vs. Surender Kumar Sood and others
CMPMO No.365 of 2019
.
11.04.2025 Present: Mr. Mukul Sood, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Further time prayed for bringing on record the legal heirs
of deceased respondent No.3. Let the needful be done within six
weeks.
Respondent No.7 though served, however, there is no
appearance on her behalf. Hence, she is proceeded against ex
parte.
Let fresh steps for the service of respondent No.6 be
taken, by way of filing correct address. Let the needful be done
within a week. On taking such steps, issue notice to respondent
No.6, returnable within four weeks thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 11, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Anil Kumar and another vs. Union of India and others
CMPMO No.276 of 2015
.
11.04.2025 Present: Mr. Ashok Sood, Senior Advocate with Ms. Pooja Verma,
Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Shashi Shirshoo, Senior Panel Counsel, for
respondents No.1 to 4.
None for respondents No.5, 6, 7 and 9 though served.
Name of respondent No.8 is deleted vide order dated
27.08.2024.
Let fresh steps for the service of resondent No.10(i) be
taken within two days. On taking such steps, issue notice to the
said respondent, returnable within four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 11, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Narender Kumar vs. Nitin Chauhan
CMPMO No.682 of 2024
.
11.04.2025 Present: Mr. D.S. Kaith, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms. Sakshi Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent.
CMP No.22836 of 2024
Reply, as prayed be filed within four weeks. List
thereafter.
r ( Bipin C. Negi )
April 11, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Kushal Kumar vs. Sunil Kumar and another
Cr. Revision No.34 of 2025
.
11.04.2025 Present: Mr. Suresh Kumar, Advocate, vice Mr. Vijender Katoch,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. H.R. Sandhu, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.2/State.
Cr.MP No.1379 of 2025
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is
allowed. Time to comply with order dated 14.01.2025, is
extended by four weeks from today. The application stands
disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 11, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Rakesh Kumar vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Cr. MP(M) No.821 of 2025
.
11.04.2025 Present: Mr. Parikshit Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
Notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate
General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the
respondent-State and seeks time to file status report.
List on 16.05.2025. Status report be filed on or before the
next date of hearing.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 11, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Suraj Thakur vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Cr. Appeal No.161 of 2025
.
11.04.2025 Present: Mr. Jyotirmay Bhatt, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
Cr. Appeal No.161 of 2025
Admit.
Call for the records.
List for hearing in due course.
Cr.MP No.1391 of 2025
By way of instant application filed under Section 430 of the
Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) 2023, the
applicant/appellant is seeking suspension of sentence.
2. In the case at hand, the applicant was sentenced to undergo
rigorous imprisonment for three years & one month and to pay a fine
of Rs.40,000/- and in default of payment of fine, he was directed to
further undergo simple imprisonment for four months. Learned
counsel contended that the appeal is likely to take considerable time
for its disposal, as such, the instant application may be allowed and
the applicant, who has already undergone 19 days of the sentence,
be released on bail during the pendency of the instant appeal.
3. On the other hand, learned Additional Advocate General
contended that the applicant/appellant is not entitled to be released
on bail during the pendency of the present appeal, as he has been
convicted in a serious offence.
4. I have heard the learned counsel for the applicant/appellant
as well as learned Additional Advocate General and have also gone
through the material available on record.
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
5. The sentence imposed, in the case at hand, is fixed term
sentence. In this respect, it would be appropriate to refer to
.
judgment dated 05.07.2024 passed in SLP(Criminal) Diary
No.27298/2024, titled Bhupatji Sartajji Jabraji Thakor Vs. The
State of Gujarat. The relevant extract is being reproduced
hereinbelow:-
“There is a fine distinction between a sentence imposed
by the trial court for a fixed term and sentence lifeimprisonment. If a sentence is for a fixed term, ordinarily,
the appellate court may exercise its discretion to suspend
the operation of the same liberally unless there are any
exceptional circumstances emerging from the record todecline. However, when it is a case of life imprisonment,
the only legal test which the Court should apply is to
ascertain whether there is anything palpable or apparent
on the face of the record on the basis of which the court
can come to the conclusion that the conviction is notsustainable in law and that the convict has very fair
chances of succeeding in his appeal. For applying such
test, it is also not permissible for the court to undertakethe exercise of re-appreciating the evidence. The
emphasis is on the word “palpable” and the expression“apparent on the face of the record”.
6. Perused the record, there are no exceptional circumstances
emerging thereof necessitating declining of relief as is being sought.
7. The instant appeal is of the year 2025 and the same is not
likely to be decided in near future. Therefore, in view of the facts and
circumstances of the case, since the applicant has already
undergone 19 days of the sentence imposed upon him by the
learned Trial Court and keeping in view of the aforesaid judgment of
the Hon’ble Supreme Court, the substantive sentence imposed upon
the applicant by the Trial Court vide judgment of conviction and
order of sentence, dated 28.03.2025, passed by learned Special
Judge, Family Court, Mandi, District Mandi, H.P., shall remain
suspended, till final disposal of the appeal, however, subject to the
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
applicant’s furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- with
.
one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of learned Trial
Court and also subject to deposit of the fine amount of Rs.40,000/-,
if not already deposited. On furnishing the requisite bail bonds and
on depositing the fine amount, he be released forthwith, if not
required in any other case, however, with the undertaking to appear
before this Court as and when directed and in the event of the
dismissal of the appeal, the applicant/appellant will surrender before
the Court.
8. However, it is made clear that the applicant shall not indulge
himself in the same crime and maintain good social behaviour, or
else, this order shall be liable to be cancelled.
9. Be it stated that any expression of opinion given in this order
does not mean an expression of opinion on the merits of the case
and the same has been given only for the purpose of deciding the
present application. The application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 11, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Bhupat Singh vs. Bajro Ram
Cr. Revision No.190 of 2025
.
11.04.2025 Present: Mr. Parveen Chandel, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Cr. Revision No.190 of 2025
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the
respondent, returnable within four weeks.
List before appropriate Bench.
Cr.MP No.1373 of 2025
The applicant-petitioner has preferred the present petition
against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated
03.09.2024, passed by learned Judicial Magistrate First Class,
Chamba, District Chamba, Himachal Pradesh (hereinafter
referred to as ‘the trial Court’), in Complaint No.252/2018, titled
Bajro Ram vs. Bhupat Singh, and affirmed by learned Additional
Sessions Judge, Chamba, District Chamba, Himachal Pradesh,
in Criminal Appeal No. 72 of 2024, titled Bhupat Singh vs. Bajro
Ram, decided on 10.01.2025. The Revision Petition filed raises
arguable points. Hence, the sentence in the case at hand, is
ordered to be suspended, subject to the petitioner depositing 50%
of the entire compensation amount, if not already deposited,
before the Trial Court within four weeks from today and also
subject to his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of
Rs.50,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction
of the learned trial Court, undertaking therein that petitioner will
attend this Court as and when required and in case of dismissal
of the revision petition, he will immediately surrender before the
learned trial Court to receive the sentence. A copy of this order be
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
sent to the learned trial Court with the direction that the report of
.
compliance of this order be submitted to this Court within a period
of six weeks.
The application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 11, 2025 (KS) Judge
r to
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Pawan vs. Indu Bansal and others
CMPMO No.622 of 2024
.
10.04.2025 Present: Mr. Arsh Chauhan, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Hemant Kumar Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. Ankit
Dhiman, Advocate, for respondent No.1/applicant in CMP
No.6656 of 2025.
None for respondents No.2 to 4.
CMP No.6656 of 2025
The present application has been filed by the counsel,
seeking leave of the Court to determine/withdraw the power of
attorney filed on behalf of respondent No.1.
From perusal of the application, it is evident that intimation
to the respondent has been made by the counsel qua his intent to
withdraw and the date of hearing, i.e., 10.04.2025 (today) vide
registered letter and on Wats-app. The postal receipt in this
respect has been appended at Page-43 of the paper-book.
In view of the aforesaid, the present application is allowed.
The counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.1 is permitted
to withdraw his power of attorney. The application stands
disposed of.
CMPMO No.622 of 2024
List on 07.05.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 10, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
M/s Pristine Hotels and Resorts Pvt. Ltd. vs. State of
Himachal Pradesh and another
Execution Petition No.270 of 2025
.
10.04.2025 Present: Mr. Sunil Mohan Goel, Senior Advocate with Mr. Raman
Jamalta, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondents/State.
List on 30.04.2025.
April 10, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Shiv Pal vs. Dayal Devi and another
CMPMO No.32 of 2024
.
10.04.2025 Present: Mr. Sohail Khan, Advocate, vice Mr. Rajesh Kumar,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Pranjal Munjal, Advocate, vice Ms. Rinki Kashmiri,
Advocate, for the respondents.
At the request of learned counsel for the parties, list on
13.05.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 10, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Kalapati alias Kalawati (deceased) through LRs. vs.
Vijay Kumar (deceased) through LRs. and others
CMPMO No.73 of 2025
.
10.04.2025 Present: Mr. Ashutosh Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Naresh Kumar Sharma, Advocate, for the
respondents.
Mr. Naresh Kumar Sharma, learned Advocate has put in
appearance on behalf of the respondents. He seeks time to file
power of attorney. Let the needful be done within four weeks.
List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 10, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Pyare Chand vs. State of HP and others
RSA No.33 of 2025
.
10.04.2025 Present: Mr. Sudhir Bhatnagar, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
Let the records of the Courts below be called for. List after
six weeks.
April 10, 2025 (KS)
to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Bindesh vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Cr. Appeal No.533 of 2024
.
10.04.2025 Present: Mr. Narender Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
Cr.MP No.1321 of 2025
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is
allowed.
Time to comply with order dated 21.10.2024, is
extended by two weeks from today.
disposed of.
r The application stands Cr. Appeal No.533 of 2024 List for hearing in due course. ( Bipin C. Negi ) April 10, 2025 (KS) Judge ::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
LAC, HPPWD and others vs. Hirdu Ram @ Roshan Lal
and others
RFA No.3 of 2025
.
10.04.2025 Present: Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
appellants/State.
Mr. G.R. Palsra, Advocate, for the respondents.
CMP No.6736 of 2025
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicants/
appellants submits that the Demand Draft qua deposit of awarded
amount along-with up-to-date interest accrued thereupon has
been prepared and since time to deposit the same in terms of
order dated 01.01.2025 has expired, he seeks extension of time
for depositing the same. Prayer allowed. Let the Demand Draft
so prepared be deposited within a week from today. The
application stands disposed of.
RFA No.3 of 2025
List for hearing in due course.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 10, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
LAC, HPPWD and another vs. Rupinder Singh and
others
RFA No.154 of 2019
.
10.04.2025 Present: Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
appellants/State.
Mr. Upinder Kumar, Advocate, vice Mr. A.S. Rana,
Advocate, for the respondents.
CMP No.6712 of 2025
Reply/instructions be filed/obtained on or before the next
date of hearing. List after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 10, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Prem Lata vs. Rama Nand
RSA No.516 of 2012
.
10.04.2025 Present: Mr. J.R. Poswal, Advocate, for the appellant.
Ms. Anubhuti Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent.
CMP No.899 of 2025
No ground for early hearing of the matter is made out, at
this stage. Accordingly, application is dismissed.
RSA No.516 of 2012
List for hearing in due course.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 10, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
The Secretary (PW) to the Govt. of HP and another vs.
M/s Ajay Kumar Sood
Arbitration Case No.101 of 2025
.
10.04.2025 Present: Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
petitioners/State.
In terms of Sections 2(i)(c)(vi) of the Commercial Courts
Act, 2015, the dispute in the case at hand pertains to a
commercial dispute. Therefore, in view of Sections 6 and 10(2) of
the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, list the matter before the
Commercial Division Bench.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 10, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
State of HP and others vs. Vinod Kumar and others
CMP(M) No.1650 of 2024
.
10.04.2025 Present: Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
applicants-appellants/State.
Mr. Abhishek Thakur, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to
7(a).
Respondent No.8 is stated to have expired.
CMP(M) Nos.496 & 497 of 2025
The present applications have been filed for bringing on
record the legal heirs of deceased respondent No.8. Details of
the legal heirs are given in Paragraph-4 of the application
(CMP(M) No.496 of 2025). On taking steps within three days,
issue notice to the proposed legal heirs of deceased respondent
No.8, returnable within four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 10, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Union of India vs. Sukh Dev and others
CMP(M) No.1497 of 2024
.
10.04.2025 Present: Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Senior Panel Counsel, for the
applicant/petitioner.
Mr. Maan Singh, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 5.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.6/State.
Reply, as prayed, be filed within four weeks. List
thereafter. r
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 10, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Mohan Chand vs. NHAI and another
Arbitration Case No.954 of 2024
.
10.04.2025 Present: Mr. Ashir Kaith, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Ms. Sneh Bhimta, Advocate, vice Ms. Shreya Chauhan,
Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.2/State.
Further time prayed for filing reply on behalf of respondent
No.2. Let the needful be done within four weeks. List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 10, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Jasjit Kaur & another vs. Pyare Lal Chopra (deceased)
through LRs. and others a/w connected
RSA No.76 of 2024 and 77 of 2020
RSA No.76 of 2024
.
10.04.2025 Present: Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Senior Advocate with Mr. Diwan Singh
Negi, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No. 1(a).
Mr. Vedhant Ranta, Advocate, vice Mr. Janesh Gupta,
Advocate, for respondent No. 4(a).
Ms. Sanjivani Sood, Advocate, for respondents No. 11(a) to
11(c).
Mr. Vishwas Kaushal, Advocate, vice Mr. Suneet Goel,
Advocate for respondent No. 12.
Mr. Devender K. Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No. 14.
Mr. Anuj Gupta, Advocate, for respondent No. 4(b).
None for respondents No. 1(b) to 1(d), 2, 3(b) to 3(f), 5, 7 to
10 and 15.
RSA No. 77 of 2020
Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Senior Advocate with Mr. Diwan Singh
Negi, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No. 1(a).
Mr. Vedhant Ranta, Advocate, vice Mr. Janesh Gupta,
Advocate, for respondent No. 4(a).
Ms. Sanjivani Sood, Advocate, for respondents No. 11(a) to
11(c).
Mr. Vishwas Kaushal, Advocate, vice Mr. Suneet Goel,
Advocate for respondent No. 12.
Mr. Atul Verma, Advocate vice Mr. V.B. Verma, Advocate, for
respondent No. 13.
None for respondents No. 5, 7, 10, 14 and 15.
At the request of learned counsel for the appellants, list
after four weeks.
[ ( Bipin C. Negi )
April 10, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Collector, Land Acquisition HPPWD and another vs.
Santu
CMP(M) No.771 of 2024
.
10.04.2025 Present: Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
applicants-appellants/State.
Sole respondent is stated to have expired.
CMP(M) No.498 & 499 of 2025
The present applications have been filed for bringing on
record the legal heirs of deceased sole respondent. Details of the
legal heirs are given in Paragraph-3 of the application (CMP(M)
No.498 of 2025). On taking steps within three days, issue notice
to the proposed legal heirs of deceased sole respondent,
returnable within four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 10, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Surjeet Singh(deceased) thorough his LRs. vs. Land
Acquisition-cum- Competent Authority and another
Arbitration Case No.735 of 2024
.
10.04.2025 Present: Mr. Gurdev Negi, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.1/State.
Ms. Sneh Bhimta, Advocate, vice Ms. Shreya Chauhan,
Advocate, for respondent No.2.
Further time prayed for removal of objection in the reply
filed in order to ensure that the same is placed on record well
before the next date of hearing. List after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 10, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Babu Ram vs. Tara Chand
CMP(M) No.639 of 2024
.
10.04.2025 Present: Ms. Nandita Guleria, Advocate, vice Mr. Abhishek Sharma,
Advocate, for the applicant/appellant.
Ms. Anchal Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent.
Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of the
applicants submits that the original counsel is unavailable today
on account of personal difficulty and prays for an adjournment.
Prayer not opposed. List for consideration after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 10, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Hira Lal and another vs. Rakesh Kumar and another
RSA No.275 of 2024
.
10.04.2025 Present: Mr. Rishabh Thakur, Advocate, vice Ms. Madhurika
Sekhon, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Harshit
Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.1 & 2.
At the request of learned vice counsel appearing on behalf
r to
of the appellants, list after six weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 10, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
The State of Himachal Pradesh and others vs. Prem
Singh and others
RSA No.79 of 2025
.
10.04.2025 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
appellants/State.
Mr. Vivek Chandel, Advocate, for the respondents.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants/
State submits that similar matters are pending adjudication before
the Apex Court (SLP(c) No.25295/2024).
In view thereof, list the matter in the first week of June,
2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 10, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
The State of Himachal Pradesh and others vs. Jindu
Ram(deceased) through LRs. and others
RSA No.103 of 2024
.
10.04.2025 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
appellants/State.
Mr. Manish Kumar Gupta, Advocate, for respondents
No.1(i) to 1(iv), 2 to 8 and 10 to 12.
Respondent No.9 proceeded against ex parte vide order
dated 13.08.2024.
r to
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants/
State submits that similar matters are pending adjudication before
the Apex Court (SLP(c) No.25295/2024).
In view thereof, list the matter in the first week of June,
2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 10, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
State of HP and others vs. Mohinder Singh and others
RSA No.25 of 2025
.
10.04.2025 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
appellants/State.
Mr. Ashwani K. Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.1
(a) to 1(c).
Mr. Mohit Dogra, Advocate, for respondents No.2, 3(a),
3(a)(i) and 3(b).
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants/
State submits that similar matters are pending adjudication before
the Apex Court (SLP(c) No.25295/2024).
In view thereof, list the matter in the first week of June,
2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 10, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
State of HP and others vs. Ram Krishan and others
RSA No.54 of 2024
.
10.04.2025 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
appellants/State.
Mr. Vivek Chandel, Advocate, for the respondents.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants/
State submits that similar matters are pending adjudication before
the Apex Court (SLP(c) No.25295/2024).
In view thereof, list the matter in the first week of June,
2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 10, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Principal Secretary Revenue and others vs. Prakash
and others
RSA No.253 of 2024
.
10.04.2025 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
appellants/State.
Mr. Malay Kaushal, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 4.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants/
State submits that similar matters are pending adjudication before
the Apex Court (SLP(c) No.25295/2024).
In view thereof, list the matter in the first week of June,
2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 10, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
.
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
State of HP and others vs. Inderjeet
RSA No.229 of 2024
.
10.04.2025 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
appellants/State.
Mr. Arun Kaushal, Advocate, for the respondent.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants/
State submits that similar matters are pending adjudication before
2025.
the Apex Court (SLP(c) No.25295/2024).
In view thereof, list the matter in the first week of June,
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 10, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
The Principal Secretary and others vs. Kanshi Ram
(deceased) through LRs.
RSA No.112 of 2024
.
10.04.2025 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
appellants/State.
Mr. Malay Kaushal, Advocate, for the respondents.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants/
State submits that similar matters are pending adjudication before
the Apex Court (SLP(c) No.25295/2024).
In view thereof, list the matter in the first week of June,
2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 10, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
State of HP and another vs. Piar Singh and another
RSA No.88 of 2024
.
10.04.2025 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
appellants/State.
Mr. Vinod Kumar Gupta, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Senior Panel Counsel, for
respondent No.2/Union of India.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants/
State submits that similar matters are pending adjudication before
the Apex Court (SLP(c) No.25295/2024).
In view thereof, list the matter in the first week of June,
2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 10, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
State of HP and another vs. Tej Singh
CMP(M) No.1428 of 2024
.
10.04.2025 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
applicants-appellants/State.
Mr. Amit Kumar Dhumal and Ms. Parul Negi, Advocates,
for the non-applicant/respondent.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants/
State submits that similar matters are pending adjudication before
the Apex Court (SLP(c) No.25295/2024).
In view thereof, list the matter in the first week of June,
2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 10, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
State of HP and others vs. Mahantu Ram and others
a/w connected matters
.
RSA No.18 of 2024 a/w RSA No.28, 30, 36, 62, 67, 71 &
72 of 2025
10.04.2025 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
appellants/State, in all the appeals.
Mr. Maan Singh and Mr. Vivek Chandel, Advocates, for
respective respondents.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants/
State submits that similar matters are pending adjudication before
the Apex Court (SLP(c) No.25295/2024).
In view thereof, list the matter in the first week of June,
2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 10, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
State of HP and others vs. Khem Singh and others
RSA No.102 of 2024
.
10.04.2025 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
appellants/State.
Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Suri, Advocate, for respondents No.1
to 3, 5 & 6.
None for respondents No.4(a)(i) to 4(a)(vii), 4(b) to 4(f),
4(h) and 7(a) to 7(c).
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants/
State submits that similar matters are pending adjudication before
the Apex Court (SLP(c) No.25295/2024).
In view thereof, list the matter in the first week of June,
2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 10, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
State of HP and others vs. Khem Singh and others
RSA No.102 of 2024
.
10.04.2025 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
appellants/State.
Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Suri, Advocate, for respondents No.1
to 3, 5 & 6.
None for respondents No.4(a)(i) to 4(a)(vii), 4(b) to 4(f),
4(h) and 7(a) to 7(c).
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants/
State submits that similar matters are pending adjudication before
the Apex Court (SLP(c) No.25295/2024).
In view thereof, list the matter in the first week of June,
2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 10, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
State of HP and another vs. M/s Elecmech
Engineers
Arbitration Case No.945 of 2023
.
10.04.2025 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
petitioners/State.
Mr. Sumit Raj Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent.
In terms of Sections 2(i)(c)(vi) of the Commercial Courts
Act, 2015, the dispute in the case at hand pertains to a
commercial dispute. Therefore, in view of Sections 6 and 10(2) of
the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, list the matter before the
Commercial Division Bench.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 10, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Rajeev Sen and others vs. State of HP and others
RSA No.27 of 2025
.
09.04.2025 Present: Mr. Paras Dhaulta, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondents/State.
Further time prayed for filing certified copy of the Trial
Court judgment. Let the needful be done within four weeks. List
thereafter. r
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 09, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Rajeev Sen and others vs. State of HP and others
RSA No.27 of 2025
.
09.04.2025 Present: Mr. Paras Dhaulta, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondents/State.
Further time prayed for filing certified copy of the Trial
Court judgment. Let the needful be done within four weeks. List
thereafter.
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
April 09, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Chet Ram vs. Bazeeru Ram (since deceased) through
LRs.
CMPMO No.674 of 2024
.
09.04.2025 Present: Mr. Harish Kumar, Advocate, vice Mr. Jagat Pal, Advocate,
for the petitioner.
Mr. Kush Sharma, Advocate, for the respondents.
Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner
submits that an application for placing on record certain additional
documents has been filed in the Registry today itself. If in order,
the same be placed on record.
List on 06.05.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 09, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Om Prakash vs. Sandesh Kumar and another
CMPMO No.311 of 2024
.
09.04.2025 Present: Mr. Sumit Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Tek Chand, Advocate, for the respondents.
As jointly prayed, list after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 09, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Kunta Devi and another vs. Sant Ram
RSA No.278 of 2024
.
09.04.2025 Present: Mr. J.R. Poswal, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Yash Pal, Advocate, vice Mr. Bhender Kumar,
Advocate, for the respondent.
Further time prayed to comply with order dated
03.01.2025. Let the same be complied with on or before the next
r to
date of hearing. List after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 09, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Neeraj Kumar vs. Yad Ram and another
RSA No.249 of 2024
.
09.04.2025 Present: Mr. Ajay Kumar Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rohit,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
RSA No.249 of 2024
Admitted on the substantial questions of law No.1 and 3,
formulated at Page-9 of the paper book.
Records be called for.
List for hearing in due course.
CMP No.19650 of 2024
In the meanwhile, reply, if any, be filed.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 09, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Raj Pal vs. Ram Pal
RSA No.222 of 2024
.
09.04.2025 Present: Mr. Piyush Chandel, Advocate, vice Mr. Ashok Kumar
Verma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Kamal Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Naresh K. Sharma,
Advocate, for the respondent.
Further time prayed for placing on record the compromise
entered into between the parties. List after six weeks.
r ( Bipin C. Negi )
April 09, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Manohar Lal and others vs. Subhash Chand and
others
.
RSA No.215 of 2024
09.04.2025 Present: Mr. K.D. Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sanjeev Sood
and Mr. Het Ram Thakur, Advocates, for the appellants.
Mr. Ishan Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Vijay Kumar, Advocate, vice Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Suri,
Advocate, for respondents No.2, 3(a) to 3(d), 8(a) to 8(e).
RSA No.215 of 2024
Respondent No.5 is stated to have expired.
Admitted on the substantial question of law No.1,
formulated at Page-9 of the paper book.
Record be called for.
List for hearing in due course.
CMP No.13795 of 2024
Interim order dated 12.08.2024 is made absolute. The
application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 09, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Faquir Chand and another vs. Mangat Ram and others
Civil Revision No.89 of 2024
.
09.04.2025 Present: Mr.Abhishek Nagta, Advocate, fo the petitioners.
Mr. N.K. Thakur, Senior Advocate with Mr. Karanveer
Singh Thakur, Advocate, for the respondents.
Records of the Court below be called for.
List on 07.05.2025.
r ( Bipin C. Negi )
April 09, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
State of HP and others vs. Ram Krishan and others
Civil Revision No.151 of 2024
.
09.04.2025 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
petitioners/State.
Mr. Atul Jhingon, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 3 and
4(a) to 4(e).
Further time prayed for filing the order-sheets of the Trial
Court, in terms of order dated 21.12.2024. Let the needful be
done within four weeks. List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 09, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
Ramesh Kumar vs. Dalip Singh and others
RSA No.61 of 2024
.
09.04.2025 Present: Mr. Ajeet Pal Singh Jaswal, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Sandeep Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Pranjal Munjal, Advocate, for respondents No.2 and 3.
CMP No.4037 of 2024
r to
Heard counsel for the parties.
Interim order dated 28.03.2024 is made absolute.
application stands disposed of.
The
RSA No.61 of 2024
List for hearing in due course.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 09, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:37 :::CIS
M/s Snow Flakes Resort & another vs. Gautam Thakur
Civil Suit No.58 of 2024
.
09.04.2025 Present: Mr. Vikrant Thakur, Advocate, for the plaintiffs.
Mr. Maan Singh, Advocate, for the defendant.
OMP No.102 of 2025
Rejoinder, as prayed, be filed within four weeks. List
thereafter.
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
April 09, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Ram Saran vs. NHAI
Civil Suit No.56 of 2024
.
09.04.2025 Present: Mr. Pranshul Sharma, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Ms. Sneh Bhimta, Advocate, vice Ms. Shreya Chauhan,
Advocate, for defendant No.1.
OMP No.1077 of 2024
Further time prayed for filing reply on behalf of the non-
applicant/defendant. Let the needful be done within four weeks.
List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 09, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Sewa Singh and others vs. Gurdev Kaur and others
RFA No.36 of 2024
.
09.04.2025 Present: Mr. Malay Kaushal, Advocate, vice Mr. Sanket Sankhyan,
Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Dixit Sahotra, Advocate, vice Mr. Pankaj Chaudhary,
Advocate, for respondents No.1, 2(i) to 2(vi), 4 and 5.
Mr. Anirudh Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.6(i) to
6(vi), 6(viii) and 6(x).
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.7/State.
At the request of learned vice counsel appearing on behalf
of the appellants, list after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 09, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Mewa Singh and another vs. Prakasho Devi and others
CMP No.5122 of 2023 in
RSA No.273 of 2000
.
09.04.2025 Present: Mr. Vipender Kumar, Advocate, vice Mr. H.S. Rana,
Advocate, for the applicants/ appellants.
Mr. Anirudh Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.1(a),
5(a) to 5(c), 7(a) & 7(b).
At the request of learned counsel appearing on behalf of
r to
the applicants, list after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 09, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
The Secretary, HP Public Works Department and
others vs. Raj Kumar @ Raju and others
CMP(M) No.652 of 2023
.
09.04.2025 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
applicants-appellants/State.
Ms. Meera Devi, Advocate, vice Mr. Deepak Gupta,
Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 3.
Further time prayed for effecting service upon respondent
No.5. Let the needful be done within two weeks.
On taking such steps, issue notice to respondent No.5,
returnable within six weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 09, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Kumari Navteya vs. Devi Singh
CMPMO No.484 of 2023
.
09.04.2025 Present: Mr. Ashwani Kondal, Advocate, vice Mr. Mohar Singh,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Karan Singh Kanwar, Advocate, for the respondent.
Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner
submits that the original counsel is unavailable today on account
of personal difficulty and prays for an adjournment. Prayer not
opposed. List for consideration after three weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 09, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Satish Kumar (deceased) through LRs. vs. Vinod
Gupta and others
.
RSA No.51 of 2023
09.04.2025 Present: Mr. Sanjay Jaswal, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Neeraj Sharma, Mr. Hemant Kumar Thakur and
Mr. Ankit Dhiman, Advocates, for respondents No.1 and 2.
None for respondents No.3 to 13.
CMP No.7125 of 2024
Learned counsel for the appellants states that he is under
instructions not to press this application, at this stage.
Accordingly, the instant application is dismissed as not pressed.
The application stands disposed of.
CMP No.7123 of 2024
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
During the pendency of the present appeal, parties are
directed to maintain status quo qua nature and possession of the
suit property. The application stands disposed of.
RSA No.51 of 2023
At the joint request of learned counsel for the parties, list
after six weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 09, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Nitin Mehan and others vs. Dushyant Kumar Sood
RSA No.296 of 2022
.
09.04.2025 Present: Mr. Ajeet Pal Singh Jaswal, Advocate, for the appellants.
Respondent is stated to have expired.
CMP(M) No.316 of 2025
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the
proposed legal heirs of deceased sole respondent, details
whereof, have been given in Paragraph-2 of the application,
returnable within four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 09, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Ganesh Kumar and Another vs. Pradeep Kumar
Civil Revision No.1 of 2022
.
09.04.2025 Present: Mr. Gurinder Singh Parmar, Advocate, for the petitioners.
CMP No.315 of 2022
Vide order dated 05.01.2022, further proceedings before
the Trial Court had been stayed. In pursuance to the aforesaid
order, steps for service of the sole respondent were to be taken.
However, till date no steps have been taken.
In view of the aforesaid abuse of process, interim order
dated 05.01.2022 is vacated. The parties are directed to appear
before the Trial Court on 22.04.2025. Trial Court to proceed with
the hearing of the matter.
Civil Revision No.1 of 2022
As prayed, list after three weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 09, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Harbans Lal vs. Darshna Devi @ Sudarshna Devi and
others
RSA No.285 of 2020
.
09.04.2025 Present: Mr. Anil Kapoor, Advocate, vice Mr. Nimish Gupta,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Jai Ram Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Respondents No.8 & 9 are ex parte.
CMP No.6153 of 2025
Reply, as prayed, be filed within four weeks.
r List
thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 09, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Nirmala Devi vs. Om Prakash
RSA No.142 of 2020
.
09.04.2025 Present: Mr. Divya Raj Singh, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Arthav Gharaik, Advocate, vice Mr. Arsh Chauhan,
Advocate, for the proposed LRs. No.1(a) to 1(d).
CMP(M) Nos.1965 and 1966 of 2024
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicants. The non-applicants have no objection, if in case, the
applications are allowed and the legal heirs of deceased sole
respondent-Om Prakash are brought on record as is being sought
in the application (CMP(M) No.1965 of 2024).
Sole respondent-Om Prakash is stated to have expired on
03.09.2022. The same is evident from the Death Certificate
appended along with the application (CMP(M) No.1965 of 2024)
as Annexure A-1. Sole respondent-Om Prakash is survived by
his legal heirs, details whereof, have been given in Paragraph-1
of the application (CMP(M) No.1965 of 2024).
Since the right to sue inheres/survives with the legal heirs of
sole respondent-Om Prakash, details whereof, have been given
in Paragraph-2 of the application (CMP(M) No.1965 of 2024),
therefore, they are ordered to be brought on record.
For the bona fide reasons stated/sufficient cause shown in
the application (CMP(M) No.1966 of 2024), delay in bringing on
record the legal heirs of deceased sole respondent, is condoned
and abatement, if any, is set aside.
The applications stand disposed of. Amended memo of
parties filed with the applications is ordered to be taken on record.
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
RSA No.142 of 2020
Mr. Arthav Gharaik, learned Advocate has put in
.
appearance on behalf of the newly added respondents No.1(a) to
1(d). He seeks time to file power of attorney. Let the needful be
done within four weeks. List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 09, 2025 (KS) Judge
r to
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Rubina and others vs. Mohd. Saleem
Civil Revision No.227 of 2018
.
09.04.2025 Present: Mr. Bimal Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Trigun Singh
Negi, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Abhishek and Sana Rana, Advocates, vice
Ms. Rachna Kuthiala, Advocate, for the respondent.
CMP No.12327 of 2024
The present application has been filed on behalf of the
respondent/tenant. By way of present application, the applicant
has made two offers, i.e., one to increase the rent and the other
to purchase the premises in question being occupied by him.
Both the offers are not acceptable to the non-applicants/ landlord.
In view thereof, present application seeking mediation on
the aforesaid two counts, is dismissed. The application stands
disposed of accordingly.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 09, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Lesar Ram and another vs. Chiru Ram
RSA No.482 of 2008
.
09.04.2025 Present: None for the appellants.
Mr. Vijay Chaudhary, Advocate, for the respondent.
List for hearing in due course.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 09, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Shakuntla Devi and others vs. Joginder Pal and others
RSA No.411 of 2008
.
09.04.2025 Present: Appellant No.1 is stated to have expired.
Mr. Divya Raj Singh, Advocate, for appellants No.2 and 3.
Ms. Seema Guleria, Advocate, for respondents No.1 & 2.
Mr. Rohit, Advocate, vice Mr. Sumit Sood, Advocate, for
respondents No.3 and 4.
Further time prayed to file an application for deletion of the
name of appellant No.1. Let the needful be done within two
weeks. List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 09, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
The Mandi Urban Cooperative Bank Ltd. vs. Daya Devi
RSA No.244 of 2024
.
08.04.2025 Present: Mr. S. Partha Swami, Advocate, vice Mr. Sanjay Bhardwaj,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Sahil Malhotra, Advocate, for the respondent.
At the request of learned vice counsel appearing on behalf
of the appellant, list after four weeks.
April 08, 2025 (KS)
to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Sanjeev Suri and another vs. Promila Suri
RSA No.144 of 2020
.
08.04.2025 Present: Mr. Sumit Sharma, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Naresh Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent.
As jointly prayed, list after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 08, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
State of H.P. and others vs. Rameshwar Dass a/w
connected matters
RSA No.61 of 2025 a/w RSA Nos.42, 47, 64
.
and 68 of 2025
08.04.2025 Present: Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the appellants/State, in all the appeals.
Mr. Arsh Chauhan, Advocate, for the respondent(s), in all
the appeals.
CMP No.5764 of 2025 in RSA No.61 of 2025
Reply be filed within four weeks. List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 08, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Hiro Devi vs. Laxmi Devi and others
RSA No.58 of 2025
.
08.04.2025 Present: Mr. Vishal Singh Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Vinod Kumar Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
RSA No.58 of 2025
Let fresh steps for the service of respondents No.2 to 11
be taken within three days. On taking such steps, issue notice to
the said respondents, returnable within four weeks.
CMP No.5904 of 2025
Notice in the aforesaid terms. Reply, if any, be filed on
behalf of respondent No.1 on or before the next date of hearing.
CMP No.5907 of 2025
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is
allowed. Certified copy of the trial Court judgment be filed on or
before the next date of hearing.
The application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 08, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Savitri Sharma vs. Shankar Singh
RSA No.57 of 2025
.
08.04.2025 Present: Ms. Geeta Thakur, Advocate, vice Ms. Madhurika Sekhon,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Jagan Nath, Advocate, for the respondent.
CMP No.5897 of 2025
Reply be filed within four weeks. List thereafter.
r ( Bipin C. Negi )
April 08, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Bam Dev and another vs. Ashok Kumar
RSA No.19 of 2025
.
08.04.2025 Present: Mr. Ajay Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. Sunny Modgill,
Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Kunal Mehta, Advocate, for the respondent.
CMP No.3087 of 2025
Reply be filed within four weeks. List thereafter.
r to
Interim order to continue.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 08, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Kiran Verma and another vs. Vijender Gupta
RSA No.20 of 2025
.
08.04.2025 Present: Mr. G.D. Verma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sumit Sharma,
Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. N.K. Bhalla, Advocate, for the respondent.
Records be called for. List after six weeks.
April 08, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Kiran Verma and another vs. Vijender Gupta
RSA No.18 of 2025
.
08.04.2025 Present: Mr. G.D. Verma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sumit Sharma,
Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. N.K. Bhalla, Advocate, for the respondent.
Records be called for. List after six weeks.
April 08, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
The State of HP vs. Saruchi Govt. Contractor and
others
CMPMO No.721 of 2024
.
08.04.2025 Present: Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the petitioner/State.
Respondent No.1 is proceeded against ex parte vide order
dated 10.01.2025.
At the request of learned Additional Advocate General, list
after four weeks.
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
April 08, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Rajinder Singh Thakur vs. MORT&H Project & others
Civil Suit No.14 of 2024
.
08.04.2025 Present: Mr. Bimal Gupta, Senior Advocate with Ms Kusum
Chaudhary, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Defendant No.1 already ex parte.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.3/State.
OMP No.311 of 2025
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the non-applicant
seeks time to file response.
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the
proposed proforma defendant No.4, returnable within six weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 08, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Rajinder Singh Thakur vs. MORT&H Project & others
Civil Suit No.14 of 2024
.
08.04.2025 Present: Mr. Bimal Gupta, Senior Advocate with Ms Kusum
Chaudhary, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Defendant No.1 already ex parte.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.3/State.
OMP No.311 of 2025
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the non-applicant
seeks time to file response.
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to proforma
defendant No.4, returnable within six weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 08, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Shyam Murari (deceased) through LRs. vs. Yogesh
Kumar and others
.
CMP(M) No.1076 of 2023 in RSA No.223 of 2012
08.04.2025 Present: Mr. Vijay Kumar, Advocate, vice Mr. Sanjeev K. Suri,
Advocate, for the applicants/appellants.
Respondent No.1 is stated to have expired.
Mr. Navlesh Verma, Advocate, for respondent-Bank No.2.
r to
CMP(M) No.1076 of 2023
Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of the
applicants seeks time to prepare the case at hand. In view
thereof, list the matter for consideration after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 08, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Kulvinder Suri and others vs. Chattar Singh and others
Civil Suit No.20 of 2023
.
08.04.2025 Present: Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ajeet Pal
Singh Jaswal, Advocate, for the plaintiffs.
Mr. Y.P. Sood, Advocate, for defendants No.1 to 4.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Advocate, for defendants No.5 and 6.
OMP No.145 and 254 of 2023
Pleadings in both the applications are complete. List for
consideration on 06.05.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 08, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Chuni Lal (deceased) through LRs. vs. Bimla and
others
RSA No.86 of 2022
.
08.04.2025 Present: Mr. Pranjal Munjal, Advocate, vice Mr. Janesh Gupta,
Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Atharv
Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.1, 3, 4(a), 4(b) and
7.
Ms. Vandana Kumari, Advocate, vice Mr. Sanjay Jaswal,
Advocate, for respondents No.8 and 9.
CMP No.5979 of 2025
Respondent No.4(c)-Smt. Meena Kumari was respondent
before the Trial Court and the First Appellate Court. From a
perusal of the judgments delivered by the said Courts, it is
evident that respondent No.4(c) had been proceeded against ex-
parte, both by the Trial Court and the First Appellate Court,
meaning thereby that the said individual had been served at the
address mentioned in the cause title of the judgments delivered
by both the Courts below.
There is no change in the address. Despite notices being
issued on the said address, the same are being returned for want
of correct address. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances of
the present case, it would be expedient in the interest of justice to
effect service upon respondent No.4(c), by way of affixation, on
the address mentioned in the memo of parties as also on the
additional address provided in Paragraph-3 of the application.
Steps be taken within three days. On taking such steps,
issue notice to respondent No.4(c), returnable within four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 08, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Maya Ram vs. Lajjya Devi (deceased) through LRs.
RSA No.305 of 2022
.
08.04.2025 Present: Mr. G.R. Palsra, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Bhender Kumar, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
Respondents No.1(a) to 1(d), 3 and 4 are already exparte
vide order dated 28.12.2022.
Respondents No.18 & 31 are stated to have expired.
dated 3.11.2022.
r to
Service of other respondents dispensed with vide order
CMP(M) No.537 & 538 of 2024
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicants. The non-applicants have no objection, if in case, the
applications are allowed and the legal heirs of deceased proforma
respondent No.18- Chiranji Lal are brought on record as is being
sought in the application (CMP(M) No.537 of 2024).
Other than the aforesaid, proposed legal heirs of deceased
respondent No.18 were served for 10.07.2024, however, since no
one appeared on their behalf, hence, they were proceeded
against ex parte.
Proforma respondent No.18- Chiranji Lal is stated to have
expired on 23.11.2023. The same is evident from the Death
Certificate appended along with the application (CMP(M) No.537
of 2024) as Annexure A-1. Respondent No.18-Chiranji Lal is
survived by his legal heirs, details whereof, have been given in
Paragraph-1 of the application (CMP(M) No.537 of 2024).
Since the right to sue inheres/survives with the legal heirs of
deceased respondent No.18-Chiranji Lal, details whereof, have
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
been given in Paragraph-1 of the application (CMP(M) No.537 of
.
2024), therefore, they are ordered to be brought on record.
For the bona fide reasons stated/sufficient cause shown in
the application (CMP(M) No.538 of 2024), delay in bringing on
record the legal heirs of deceased proforma respondent No.18, is
condoned and abatement, if any, is set aside.
The applications stand disposed of. Amended memo of
parties filed with the applications is ordered to be taken on record.
RSA No.305 of 2022
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to newly
added respondents No.18(a) to 18(f) & 31(a) to 31(c), returnable
within four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 08, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Kaushalya Devi vs. Roshani Devi (since deceased)
through her LRs.
.
RSA No.49 of 2022
08.04.2025 Present: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Atharv
Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Naveen K. Bhardwaj, Advocate, for respondents
No.1(i) to 1(iv) and 1(v)(a) to 1(v)(d) & 1(vi).
Record stands received.
List for hearing in due course. In the meanwhile, power of
attorney on behalf of the parties be filed.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 08, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
HPSEBL & Another vs. Bhim Singh and others
RSA No.112 of 2021
.
08.04.2025 Present: Ms. Sunita Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Surender
Kumar, Advocate, for the appellants.
Ms. Suchitra Sen, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 5.
Ms. Kusum Chaudhary, Advocate, vice Mr. Neel Pathak,
Advocate, for respondent No.6.
r to
As jointly prayed, list after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 08, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Bhgwan Chand vs. Jai Krishan and others a/w
connected matter
RSA No.157 of 2020 a/w
RSA No.158 of 2020
.
08.04.2025 Present: Mr. Anshul Gandhi, Advocate, vice Mr. C.N. Singh,
Advocate, for the appellant, in both the appeals.
Mr. Rohit, Advocate, vice Mr. Sumit Sood, Advocate, for
respondents No.1 to 3, 5 and 6, in both the appeals.
None for proposed LR No.4(a).
CMP(M) Nos.1473 & 1474 of 2024 in RSA No.157 of
2020
Time for taking steps for effecting service upon
respondents No.4(b) and 4(c) is being sought since 26.09.2024.
Let the needful be done within one week.
It is made clear that if steps are not taken within one
week, then the appeal shall automatically stand dismissed for non
prosecution without further reference to this Court.
In the event of steps being taken within one week, issue
notice to respondents No.4(b) and 4(c), returnable within four
weeks.
RSA Nos.157 & 158 of 2020
List after four weeks. In the meanwhile, power of attorney
on behalf of respondents No.3, 5 and 6 be also filed.
Since the record, in the case at hand, stands received,
therefore, there is no need to file certified copy of the trial Court
judgment.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 08, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Executive Engineer, NH Division vs. Ramesh Chand
(deceased) through LRs.
.
RFA No.159 of 2019
08.04.2025 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
appellants/State.
Mr. Atharv Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.1(a) to
1(c) and proposed LRs. of deceased respondent No.1(d).
Respondent No.1(d) is stated to have expired.
CMP(M) No.1995 & 1996 of 2024
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicants. The non-applicants have no objection, if in case, the
applications are allowed and the legal heirs of deceased
respondent No.1(d)- Indra Sharma are brought on record as is
being sought in the application (CMP(M) No.1995 of 2024).
Respondent No.1(d)- Indira Sharma is stated to have
expired on 04.04.2024. The same is evident from the Death
Certificate appended along with the application (CMP(M) No.1995
of 2024) as Annexure A-1. Respondent No.1(d)- Indira Sharma is
survived by her legal heirs, details whereof, have been given in
Paragraph-4 of the application (CMP(M) No.1995 of 2024). The
same is in consonance with the details of the legal heirs given in
Legal Heirs Certificate appended along with the application
(CMP(M) No.1995 of 2024) as Annexure A-2.
Since the right to sue inheres/survives with the legal heirs of
deceased respondent No.1(d)- Indira Sharma, details whereof,
have been given in Paragraph-4 of the application (CMP(M)
No.1995 of 2024), therefore, they are ordered to be brought on
record.
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
For the bona fide reasons stated/sufficient cause shown in
.
the application (CMP(M) No.1996 of 2024), delay in bringing on
record the legal heirs of deceased respondent No.1(d), is
condoned and abatement, if any, is set aside.
The applications stand disposed of. Amended memo of
parties filed with the applications is ordered to be taken on
record.
RFA No.159 of 2019
Mr. Atharv Sharma, learned Advocate has put in
appearance on behalf of the newly added respondents No.1(d)(i)
and 1(d)(ii). He seeks time to file power of attorney. Let the
needful be done within four weeks. List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 08, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Suman Devi vs. Gayatri Devi and another
CMPMO No.115 of 2019
.
07.04.2025 Present: Mr. Ajay Kumar Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rohit,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
None for the respondents.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner
submits that the matter is now posted before the trial Court for
recording of defendant’s evidence on 03.06.2025.
Other than the aforesaid, learned counsel for the petitioner
contends that the disputes, in the case at hand, is squarely
covered by the decision of this Court in Ashok Kapoor vs.
Murtu Devi, 2016 (1) Shim. LC 207.
In view thereof, list the matter for consideration on
21.04.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 07, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Ram Kumar vs. Surjeet Kaur and others
CMPMO No.36 of 2025
.
07.04.2025 Present: Mr. Onkar Jairath and Mr. Anshul Jairath, Advocates, for
the petitioner.
CMPMO No.36 of 2025
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the
contesting respondents (respondents No.1 to 5), returnable
within four weeks.
No notice is being issued to proforma
respondent No.6, at this stage.
CMP No.1871 of 2025
Notice in the aforesaid terms.
In the meanwhile, further proceedings pending before
learned Senior Civil Judge, Court No.1, Una, District Una, in
Civil Suit No.136 of 2011, titled Ram Kumar vs. Surjeet Kaur
and others, shall remain stayed.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 07, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Kishan and others vs. Shiv Ram (since deceased)
through LRs. and others
.
RSA No.254 of 2022
07.04.2025 Present: Mr. Kuldeep Singh Chandel and Mr. Kamaljeet Sharma,
Advocates, for the appellants.
Mr. Romesh Verma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sumit
Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.1(a), 1(c) to 1(e), 2
& 3.
through the record.
r to
Learned counsel for the parties seek further time to go
List after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 07, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Madan Lal vs. Bal Krishan
RSA No.232 of 2022
.
07.04.2025 Present: Mr. Sarthak Upadhayaya, Advocate, vice Mr. Sanjay
Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Aman Parth Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent.
CMP No.11373 of 2022
Reply, if any, be filed on or before the next date of hearing.
RSA No.232 of 2022
r to
Interim order to continue.
Record stands received.
Learned counsel for the parties intend to go through the
same.
List for consideration after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 07, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Sheela Devi vs. Rattan Chand
CMPMO No.695 of 2024
.
07.04.2025 Present: Mr. Surinder Saklani, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Dheeraj K. Vashisht, Advocate, for the respondent.
Record stands received.
Learned counsel for the parties intend to go through the
same.
List for consideration after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 07, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Savita Sharma vs. Chander Kant and others
CMPMO No.371 of 2024
.
07.04.2025 Present: Mr. Gurinder Singh, Advocate, vice Mr. N.K. Bhalla,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Y.P. Sood, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.2/State.
Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner
submits that the original counsel is unavailable today on account
of personal difficulty and prays for an adjournment. Prayer not
opposed. List for consideration after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 07, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Sanjeev Kumar vs. Prakash Chand
Civil Revision No.192 of 2024
.
07.04.2025 Present: Ms. Amita Chandel, Advocate, vice Ms. Rachna Kuthiala,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Dheeraj K. Vashisht, Advocate, for the respondent.
Mr. Dheeraj K. Vashisht, learned Advocate has put in
appearance on behalf of the respondent. He seeks time to file
List thereafter.
r to
power of attorney. Let the needful be done within four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 07, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Sanjay Sood vs. Arvind Shegal and others
Civil Revision No.47 of 2022
.
07.04.2025 Present: Mr. G.C. Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Deepak Gupta,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Sudhir Thakur, Senior Advocate with Mr. Karun Negi,
Advocate, for respondent No.2.
Names of respondents No.3 and 3 stand deleted.
Respondents No.5 and 6 proceeded against ex parte.
Arguments heard. Judgment reserved.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 07, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Kusum Lata Mokta and another vs. Vidya Devi and
others
RSA No.185 of 2024
.
07.04.2025 Present: Mr. Bhupinder Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ajeet Pal
Singh Jaswal, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Bharat Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondents No.2 and 3/State.
None for respondents No.4 to 7.
Learned counsel for respondent No.1 submits that learned
original counsel who was to argue the case is unavailable today
on account of personal difficulty. He seeks an adjournment.
Prayer not opposed.
As prayed, list after four weeks. Interim order to continue.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 07, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Sunder Singh vs. Mohan Lal a/w connected matters
RSA No. 123 of 2024 a/w RSA Nos.186 and 191 of 2024
.
RSA No. 123 of 2024
07.04.2025 Present: Mr. Karan Singh Kanwar, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Ravneet Kumar, Advocate, vice Mr. Desh Raj Thakur,
Advocate, for the respondent.
RSA Nos. 186 and 191 of 2024
Mr. Ravneet Kumar, Advocate, vice Mr. Desh Raj Thakur,
Advocate, for the appellant(s), in both the appeals.
Mr. Karan Singh Kanwar, Advocate, for the respondent(s),
in both the appeals.
Learned counsel for the parties seek further time to go
through the record.
List after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 07, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Darshan Lal Arya vs. Ram Chander
RSA No.69 of 2024
.
07.04.2025 Present: Mr. Karan Singh Kanwar, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Virender Thakur, Advocate, for the respondent.
At the request of learned vice counsel appearing on behalf
of the appellant, list after three weeks.
April 07, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Mukhtyari Devi and others vs. Hargovind Singh and
others
RSA No.250 of 2024
.
04.04.2025 Present: Ms. Ananya Verma, Advocate, vice Mr. Sunny Modgill,
Advocate, for the appellants.
Ms. Shrutika Chauhan, Advocate, for respondents No.1,
2(i) and 2(ii).
As jointly prayed, list after four weeks.
April 04, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Bela Devi vs. Rajiv Thakur
CMPMO No.694 of 2024
.
04.04.2025 Present: Mr. Ajay Chauhan, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Bhim Raj Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent.
Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the
objections in the reply filed shall positively be removed during the
course of the day. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
petitioner submits that no rejoinder is intended to be filed on
behalf of the petitioner.
List on 07.04.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 04, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Narender Kumar vs. Nitin Chauhan
CMPMO No.682 of 2024
.
04.04.2025 Present: Mr. D.S. Kaith and Ms. Saroj, Advocates, for the petitioner.
Ms. Sakshi Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent.
CMP No.22836 of 2024
Reply, as prayed be filed within four weeks. List
thereafter.
It is made clear that if no reply is filed on or before the next
date of hearing, then the right to file the same shall stand closed
without further reference to this Court.
Interim order to continue.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 04, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Raj Kumari vs. Rajat Sharma and another
CMPMO No.610 of 2024
.
04.04.2025 Present: Mr. Pranjal Munjal, Advocate, vice Mr. Janesh Gupta,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Atharv Sharma, Advocate, for the respondents.
CMP No.19380 of 2024
Reply, if any, be filed within four weeks. List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 04, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Sandhya Devi vs. Mati Raj and others
RSA No.273 of 2024
.
04.04.2025 Present: Mr. G.R. Palsra, Advocate, for the appellant.
Ms Madhurika Sekhon Verma, Advocate, for respondent
No.1.
None for respondent No.2.
As jointly prayed, list after six weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 04, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Kamlesh Kalia vs. Babu Ram (deceased) through his
LRs.
RSA No.259 of 2024
.
04.04.2025 Present: Mr. Praveen Chandel, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Arun Kaushal, Advocate, for the respondents.
As jointly prayed, list after four weeks.
April 04, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
State of Himachal Pradesh and another vs. M/s P.K.
Construction
Arbitration Case No.56 of 2014
.
04.04.2025 Present: Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the petitioners.
Mr. J.S. Bhogal, Senior Advocate with Ms. Srishti Verma,
Advocate, for the respondent.
In terms of Sections 2(i)(c)(vi) of the Commercial Courts
Act, 2015, the dispute in the case at hand pertains to a
commercial dispute. Therefore, in view of Sections 6 and 10(2)
of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, list the matter before the
Commercial Division Bench.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 04, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Sandeep Bhardwaj vs. Shakuntala
RSA No.167 of 2024
.
04.04.2025 Present: Mr. Y.P. Sood, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Pranjal Munjal, Advocate, vice Mr. Janesh Gupta,
Advocate, for the respondent.
As jointly prayed, list after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 04, 2025 (KS)
r Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Desh Raj (deceased) through LRs. vs. Hem Raj
RSA No.3 of 2010
.
04.04.2025 Present: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Atharv
Sharma, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. K.D. Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Het Ram Thakur,
Advocate, for respondent No.1(a), 2 to 7.
Respondents No.10 and 14 have expired.
Respondents No.8, 9, 11 to 13, 15 and 16 are ex parte
vide order dated 19.09.2022.
Service of respondents No.17 and 18 was exempted vide
order dated 26.07.2012.
CMP(M) No.403 of 2025
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the legal
heirs of deceased respondent No.10, details whereof have been
given in Paragraph-1 of the application, returnable within four
weeks.
CMP(M) No.404 of 2025
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the legal
heirs of deceased respondent No.14, details whereof have been
given in Paragraph-1 of the application, returnable within four
weeks.
CMP(M) No.1515 of 2022
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicants. The non-applicants have no objection, if in case, the
application is allowed.
I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused
the pleadings. Respondent No.1-Hem Raj is stated to have died
on 01.07.2021. The same is evident from the Death Certificate
appended along with the present application. The details of the
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
legal heir of deceased respondent No.1-Hem Raj are given in
.
Paragraph-1 of the application.
However, from perusal of the reply filed to the present
application, it is evident that other than Anil Kumar, there are
other legal heirs of deceased respondent No.1-Hem Raj.
Deceased respondent No.1-Hem Raj had executed a Will in
favour of his son (Anil Kumar) and daughter-in-law (Smt. Anita
Sharma). Mutation to that effect has also been attested in their
favour (Page-91 of the paper book).
Since the right to sue inheres/survives in two legal heirs of
deceased respondent No.1-Hem Raj, details whereof, have been
given in Paragraph-2 of the reply filed to the present application,
therefore, they are ordered to be brought on record.
For the bona fide reasons stated/sufficient cause shown in
the application, delay in bringing on record the legal heirs of
deceased respondent No.1-Hem Raj, is condoned and
abatement, if any, is set aside.
The application stands disposed of. Amended memo of
parties appended with the present application is ordered to be
taken on record.
CMP No.5574 of 2025
Allowed and the applicants are exempted from filing Hindi
translated copies of the documents, in question, annexed with
the accompanying appeal, at this stage, subject to filing of the
same within seven days, as and when directed to do so. The
application stands disposed of.
CMP No.5555 of 2025
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Allowed and the applicants are exempted from filing Hindi
translated copies of the documents, in question, annexed with
.
the accompanying appeal, at this stage, subject to filing of the
same within seven days, as and when directed to do so. The
application stands disposed of.
CMP No.2496 of 2025
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is
allowed and disposed of.
r ( Bipin C. Negi )
April 04, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Vinod Kumar vs. Ram Rakha (deceased) through LRs.
and others
RSA No.600 of 2009
.
04.04.2025 Present: Ms. Amita Chandel, Advocate, vice Ms. Rachna Kuthiala,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Name of respondent No.1(a) stands deleted vide order
dated 05.01.2024.
Mr. J.S. Bagga, Advocate, for respondents No.2 and 3.
As jointly prayed list after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 04, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Ravinder Kumar and others vs. Karam Chand and
others
RSA No.235 of 2009
.
04.04.2025 Present: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Ms. Kavita Kajal,
Advocate, for the appellants.
Names of respondents No.1, 2 and 3 arleady stand
deleted.
None for respondent No.4.
The amended memo of parties filed by the appellants be
taken on record.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 04, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Krishan Kumar and others vs. Med Ram and others
RSA No.607 of 2008
.
04.04.2025 Present: Mr. O.P. Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Gurmeet
Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the appellants.
None for the respondents.
RSA No.607 of 2008
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants
submits that in the previous order, it has wrongly been mentioned
alive.
r to
that appellants No.4 and 5 have expired, however, they are still
Further time prayed for bringing on record the legal heirs
of deceased respondents No.7, 8, 13, 17, 18, 22, 23 and 26. Let
the needful be done within four weeks. List thereafter.
CMP(M) No.422 and 423 of 2025
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicants. The non-applicants have no objection, if in case, the
applications are allowed and the legal heirs of deceased
appellant No.3-Nand Lal, are brought on record as is being
sought in the application (CMP(M) No.422 of 2025).
Appellant No.3-Nand Lal is stated to have expired on
09.06.2012. The same is evident from the Death Certificate
appended along with the application (CMP(M) No.422 of 2025) as
Annexure A-1. Deceased appellant No.3-Nand Lal is survived by
his legal heirs, details whereof, have been given in Paragraph-3
of the application (CMP(M) No.422 of 2025). The same is in
consonance with the details of the legal heirs given in Legal Heirs
Certificate appended along with the application (CMP(M) No.422
of 2025) as Annexure A-2.
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Since the right to sue inheres/survives with the legal heirs of
.
deceased appellant No.3-Nand Lal, details whereof, have been
given in Paragraph-3 of the application (CMP(M) No.422 of
2025), therefore, they are ordered to be brought on record.
For the bona fide reasons stated/sufficient cause shown in
the application (CMP(M) No.423 of 2025), delay in bringing on
record the legal heirs of deceased appellant No.3-Nand Lal, is
condoned and abatement, if any, is set aside.
The applications stand disposed of. Amended memo of
parties be filed within four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 04, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Shamsher Singh (since deceased) through LR. &
others vs. Jagan Nath and others
RSA No.258 of 2008
.
04.04.2025 Present: Mr. Sanjeev Kuthiala, Senior Advocate with Ms. Amita
Chandel, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Sahil Dixit, Advocate, for the respondents.
CMP(M) No.1412 of 2025
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicants. The non-applicants have no objection, if in case, the
application is allowed.
I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused
the pleadings. Appellant No.14(a)-Hardyal Singh is stated to
have died on 15.02.2018. The same is evident from the Death
Certificate appended along with the present application. The
details of the legal heirs of deceased appellant No.14(a)- Hardyal
Singh are given in Paragraph-3 of the application.
Since the right to sue inheres/survives in the legal heirs of
deceased appellant No.14(a)-Hardyal Singh, detail whereof,
have been given in Paragraph-3 of the application, therefore,
they are ordered to be brought on record.
For the bona fide reasons stated/sufficient cause shown in
the application, delay in bringing on record the legal heirs of
deceased appellant No.14(a)-Hardyal Singh, is condoned and
abatement, if any, is set aside.
The application stands disposed of. Amended memo of
parties be filed within four weeks.
CMP(M) No.1790 of 2023
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
applicants. The non-applicants have no objection, if in case, the
.
application is allowed.
I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused
the pleadings. Appellant No.20-Smt. Soma Devi is stated to have
died on 10.04.2017. The same is evident from the Death
Certificate appended along with the present application. In terms
of a Will, the property of the deceased appellant No.20-Smt.
Soma Devi, has been inherited by one Jatinder Pal Singh. On the
basis of the Will, appropriate modification has also been
incorporated in the revenue record.
Since the right to sue inheres/survives in the legal heir of
deceased appellant No.20-Smt. Soma Devi, details whereof,
have been given in Paragraph-3 of the application, therefore, he
is ordered to be brought on record.
For the bona fide reasons stated/sufficient cause shown in
the application, delay in bringing on record the legal heirs of
deceased appellant No.20-Smt. Soma Devi, is condoned and
abatement, if any, is set aside.
The application stands disposed of. Amended memo of
parties appended with the present application is ordered to be taken
on record.
RSA No.258 of 2008
Henceforth, name of Mr. Ajay Sharma learned Senior
Advocate and Mr. Atharv Sharma, learned Advocate be not
reflected in the cause list as counsel for the appellants.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 04, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Phuyian (deceased) through LRs. vs. Krishan Kumar
(deceased) through LRs. and others
RSA No.419 of 2002
.
04.04.2025 Present: Mr. Bimal Gupta, Senior Advocate with Ms. Simran,
Advocate, for the appellants No.1(a), 1(c) to 1(k).
Appellant No.1(b) is stated to have expired.
Mr. K.D. Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Het Ram Thakur,
Advocate, for respondent No.1(a).
None for respondent No.1(b).
CMP(M) No.424 of 2025
Reply, if any, be filed on or before the next date of hearing.
As prayed, list on 16.05.2025. Learned counsel appearing
on behalf of respondent No.1(a) submits that in the meanwhile
power of attorney on behalf of the said respondent shall also be
filed.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 04, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Onkar Singh and another vs. Mehar Singh and others
RSA No.75 of 2025
.
04.04.2025 Present: Mr. Rajender Kumar Sharma and Mr. Anshuman Thakur,
Advocates, for the appellants.
RSA No.75 of 2025
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the
respondents, on substantial questions of law No.2 and 3,
weeks.
r to
formulated at Page-22 of the paper book, returnable within four
Records be called for.
CMP No.6079 of 2025
Notice in the aforesaid terms.
In the meanwhile, operation and execution of judgment &
decree dated 31.12.2011, passed by learned Civil Judge
(Junior Division), Jawali, District Kangra, in Civil Suit
No.868/95/93, as affirmed by learned Additional District Judge,
Nurpur, District Kangra, vide judgment dated 16.01.2025,
passed in Civil Appeal No.85-XIII/2013/2023, titled Onkar
Singh and another vs. Mehar Singh (deceased) through LRs.
and others, shall remain stayed.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 04, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Anil Kumar vs. Vijay Kashyap
Cr. Revision No.19 of 2025
.
04.04.2025 Present: Mr. G.R. Palsra, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Yash Pal, Advocate, for the respondent.
Cr.MP No.1238 of 2025
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is
allowed. Time granted for depositing 50% of the compensation
amount in terms of order dated 08.01.2025 is extended by four
weeks from today, i.e., 04.04.2025. The application stands
disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 04, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Tikam Singh vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Cr.MP(M) No.755 of 2025
.
04.04.2025 Present: Mr. Sanjay Verma, Advocate, vice Mr. Ganesh Barowalia,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
Notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate
General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the
respondent-State and seeks time to file status report.
List on 05.05.2025. Status report be filed on or before the
next date of hearing.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 04, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Prince vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Cr.MP(M) No.749 of 2025
.
04.04.2025 Present: Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Suri, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
Notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate
General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the
respondent-State and seeks time to file status report.
List on 07.05.2025. Status report be filed on or before the
next date of hearing.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 04, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Rani Devi vs. Manoj Kumar
CMPMO No.136 of 2025
.
04.04.2025 Present: Ms. Prajwal Busta, Advocate, for the petitioner.
CMPMO No.136 of 2025 & CMP No.6035 of 2025
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the
respondent, returnable for 06.05.2025.
April 04, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Sudesh Kumar vs. Hans Raj and others a/w connected
matter
RSA No.272 of 2024 a/w
.
CMP(M) No.2054 of 2024
04.04.2025 Present: Mr. Vikas Rathore, Advocate, for the appellant in RSA
No.272 of 2024 and for the applicant in CMP(M) No.2054
of 2024.
Mr. Goldy Kumar, Advocate, for the respondent in CMP(M)
No.2054 of 2024.
CMP(M) No.2054 of 2024
Notice. Mr. Goldy Kumar, learned counsel, appears and
waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents and seeks
time to file reply.
Reply be filed within four weeks. List thereafter.
RSA No.272 of 2024
List along-with CMP(M) No.2054 of 2024.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 04, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Ramesh Chand vs. State of HP and another
Arbitration Case No.944 of 2024
.
03.04.2025 Present: Mr. Y.P. Sood, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondents/State.
In terms of Sections 2(i)(c)(vi) of the Commercial Courts
Act, 2015, the dispute in the case at hand pertains to a
commercial dispute. Therefore, in view of Sections 6 and 10(2) of
the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, list the matter before the
Commercial Division Bench.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 03, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Devinder Singh Siphehia vs. State of HP and others
a/w connected matter
RSA No.171 of 2023 a/w RSA No.172 of 2023
.
RSA No.171 of 2023
03.04.2025 Present: Mr. K.D. Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rahul Gathania,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondents No.1 to 5/State.
None for respondents No.6, 12, 17 and 18.
Mr. Vishwas Kaushal, Advocate, for respondents No.7 to 10,
13, 14 and 16(a) & 16(b).
Mr. Prashant Chauhan and Mr. Hamender Singh Jaswal,
Advocates, vice Mr. Sandeep Dutta, Advocate, for
respondent No.11.
Ms. Richa Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.12.
RSA No.172 of 2023
Mr. K.D. Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rahul Gathania,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondents No.1 to 5/State.
None for respondents No.6 and 12.
Mr. Vishwas Kaushal, Advocate, for respondents No.7 to 10,
13 and 14.
Mr. Prashant Chauhan and Mr. Hamender Singh Jaswal,
Advocates, vice Mr. Sandeep Dutta, Advocate, for
respondent No.11.
Ms. Richa Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.12.
CMP No.9309 of 2023 in RSA No.171 of 2023
The present application is dismissed as not pressed on
account of the fact that sewerage connection stands sanctioned and
has been implemented on the spot, however liberty is reserved to
approach this Court if the need in the future arises.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 03, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Dev Raj (deceased) through LRs. vs. Satya Devi and
others
RSA No.157 of 2007
.
03.04.2025 Present: Mr. K.D. Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rahul Gathania,
Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Bimal Gupta, Senior Advocate with Ms. Kusum
Chaudhary, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 8, 10 to 22,
24 to 27, 29 and 30.
None for remaining respondents.
CMP(M) No.401 of 2025
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicants. The non-applicants have no objection, if in case, the
application is allowed and the legal heirs of deceased appellant
No.1(c)- Bhagti, are brought on record as is being sought in the
present application. Legal heirs of deceased appellant No.1(c)-
Bhagti, have been served. Power of attorney stands filed on their
behalf.
Heard counsel for the parties. Deceased appellant No.1(c)-
Bhagti is stated to have expired on 28.12.2024. The same is evident
from the Death Certificate appended along with the present
application. The details of the legal heirs of deceased appellant
No.1(c)- Bhagti are given in Paragraph-3 of the application.
Since the right to sue inheres/survives with the legal heirs of
deceased appellant No.1(c)- Bhagti, details whereof, have been
given in Paragraph-3 of the present application, therefore, they are
ordered to be brought on record.
The application stands disposed of. Amended memo of
parties appended with the present application is ordered to be taken
on record.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 03, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Devi Roop vs. State of HP and others
Execution Petition No.152 of 2025
.
03.04.2025 Present: Mr. Bonit Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Manish Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for
respondents No.1 to 3/ State.
Mr. Tek Ram Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.4.
Notice. Mr. Manish Thakur, learned Deputy Advocate
respondent
No.4,
General and Mr. Tek Ram Sharma, learned counsel, appear and
waive service of notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3 and
respectively and seeks time to file
reply/instructions.
Reply/instructions be filed/obtained on or before the next
date of hearing. List on 02.05.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 03, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Narayan Singh vs. State of HP and others
Execution Petition No.141 of 2025
.
03.04.2025 Present: Mr. M.L. Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Manish Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for the
respondents/ State.
Notice. Mr. Manish Thakur, learned Deputy Advocate
General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the
List on 02.05.2025.
r to
respondents and seeks time to have instructions.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 03, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Khem Raj vs. State of HP and others
Execution Petition No.143 of 2025
.
03.04.2025 Present: Mr. M.L. Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Manish Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for the
respondents/ State.
Notice. Mr. Manish Thakur, learned Deputy Advocate
General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the
List on 02.05.2025.
r to
respondents and seeks time to have instructions.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 03, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Jai Kumar vs. HRTC and another
Execution Petition No.138 of 2025
.
03.04.2025 Present: Mr. Vikas Rajput, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms. Shrutika Chauhan, Advocate, vice Mr. Dheeraj K.
Vashishta, Advocate, for the respondents.
Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of the
respondents-Corporation has placed on record instructions dated
02.04.2025.
From a perusal of the same, it is evident that the pay
fixation, in the case at hand, has taken place. However, further
time is prayed for disbursement of the payments. In view thereof,
list the matter on 08.05.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 03, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Bhagmal vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Cr.MP(M) No.123 of 2025
.
03.04.2025 Present: Mr. Vinod Kumar Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
ASI Birbal Singh, I/O Police Station, Patlikuhal, District
Kullu, Himachal Pradesh, is present along-with record.
Fresh status report stands filed. The same is taken on
record. Copy, whereof, has been supplied to learned counsel for
the petitioner, who intends to go through the same.
From perusal of the status report, it is evident that out of
fourteen witnesses, five witnesses have been examined. The
case involves contraband which comes within the category of
commercial quantity. Rigors of Section 37 of the Narcotic Drugs
and Psychotropic Substances Act apply.
List for consideration on 23.04.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 03, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Makbul and others vs. Union of India and others
OMP(M) No.37 of 2025
.
03.04.2025 Present: Mr. Vinay Thakur, Advocate, for the applicants-appellants.
Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Senior Panel Counsel, for
respondent No.1/Union of India.
Ms. Sneh Bhimta, Advocate, vice Ms. Shreya Chauhan,
Advocate, for respondents No.2 and 3.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.4/State.
Notice. Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, learned Senior Panel
counsel, Ms. Sneh Bhimta, learned counsel and Mr. B.N.
Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General, appear and waive
service of notice on behalf of respondent No.1, respondents No.2
& 3 and respondent No.4, respectively and seek time to file reply.
Reply be filed on or before the next date of hearing. List
after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 03, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Bhadru alias Bhadar Singh vs. Union of India and
others
OMP(M) No.36 of 2025
.
03.04.2025 Present: Mr. Vinay Thakur, Advocate, for the applicant-appellant.
Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Senior Panel Counsel, for
respondent No.1/Union of India.
Ms. Sneh Bhimta, Advocate, vice Ms. Shreya Chauhan,
Advocate, for respondents No.2 and 3.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.4/State.
Notice. Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, learned Senior Panel
counsel, Ms. Sneh Bhimta, learned counsel and Mr. B.N.
Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General, appear and waive
service of notice on behalf of respondent No.1, respondents No.2
& 3 and respondent No.4, respectively and seek time to file reply.
Reply be filed on or before the next date of hearing. List
after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 03, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Hukam Chand and others vs. NHAI and another
Arbitration Case No.37 of 2025
.
03.04.2025 Present: Mr. Nalnush Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Hamender Singh
Chandel, Advocate, for the applicants.
Mr. Karan Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.2/State.
Reply is stated to have been filed. The same is not on
record. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicants
submits that he has received a copy of the same. Let
objection(s), if any, in the reply be removed and the same be
placed on record well before the next date of hearing.
List after four weeks. Rejoinder to the reply, if any, be
filed on or before the next date of hearing.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 03, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Hari Chand and others vs. NHAI and another
Arbitration Case No.29 of 2025
.
03.04.2025 Present: Mr. Nalnush Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Hamender Singh
Chandel, Advocate, for the applicants.
Mr. Karan Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.2/State.
Reply on behalf of respondent No.1 stands filed. Time
prayed on behalf of the applicants to file rejoinder thereto. Let the
needful be done within four weeks. List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 03, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Ludermani (deceased) & others vs. Dharam Chand and
others
CMP(M) No.2083 of 2024
.
03.04.2025 Present: Mr. Digvijay Singh, Advocate, for the applicants.
Mr. G.R. Palsra, Advocate, fo the non-applicants.
Reply stands filed. Rejoinder thereto, if any, be filed within
three weeks. List thereafter.
April 03, 2025 (KS)
to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Chhangu Ram and another vs. Puran Chand and
others
CMP(M) No.1998 of 2024
.
03.04.2025 Present: Mr. G.R. Palsra, Advocate, for the applicants-appellants.
Mr. H.S. Rangra, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Lokesh Thakur, Advocate, for respondents No.8 and 9.
None for respondents No.2, 3, 5 to 10, 11(a) to 11(c),
12(a), 12(b) and 13.
CMP No.6018 of 2025
The
rpresent
application is dismissed as being
misconceived.
CMP(M) No.1998 of 2024
Heard counsel for the parties. For the sufficient cause
shown in the application, the same is allowed. Delay of 29 days
in filing the appeal, is condoned. The application stands disposed
of.
RSA No.______of 2025
Be registered.
List for admission on 22.04.2025.
CMP_______ of 2025
Be registered.
List along-with main appeal.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 03, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Bhupender Singh vs. Desh Raj
CMP(M) No.1107 of 2024
.
03.04.2025 Present: Mr. Surya Chauhan, Advocate, for the applicant-appellant.
Mr. Balwant Singh Thakur, Advocate, for the respondent.
Reply is stated to have been filed today in the Registry of
this Court. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that he has
received a copy of the same. If in order, the same be placed on
record well before the next date of hearing. List after two weeks.
In the meanwhile, rejoinder to the reply, if any, be filed on behalf
of the applicant.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 03, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
M/s Om Prakash Sharma vs. State of HP and others
Arbitration Case No.801 of 2024
.
03.04.2025 Present: Mr. Parav Sharma, Advocate, for the applicant/ petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondents/State.
In terms of Sections 2(i)(c)(vi) of the Commercial Courts
Act, 2015, the dispute in the case at hand pertains to a
commercial dispute. Therefore, in view of Sections 6 and 10(2) of
the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, list the matter before the
Commercial Division Bench.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 03, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Karnail Singh vs. Ashok Kumar
CMP(M) No.447 of 2024
.
03.04.2025 Present: Mr. Ashwani Kaundal, Advocate, for the applicant-
appellant.
On the last date of hearing, time was sought for removing
objections in the application filed for bringing on record the legal
heirs of deceased sole respondent. Till date, the same have not
day itself. List thereafter.
r to
been removed. Let the needful be done during the course of the
It is made clear that if the objections are not removed in
the above application during the course of the day itself, present
application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal shall
automatically stand dismissed for non prosecution without further
reference to this Court.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 03, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Himmat Ram and another vs. Dharam Dass and others
RSA No.195 of 2024
.
03.04.2025 Present: Mr. Inder Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant No.2 and for
proposed LRs. No.1(a), 1(b) and 1(d).
Mr. Romesh Verma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Digvijay
Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Virender Singh Kanwar, Advocate, for respondents
No.9 and 10.
Respondent No.30 is stated to have expired.
None for the remaining respondents.
Further time prayed by learned counsel appearing on behalf
of the appellants for taking consequential steps for bringing on
record the legal heirs of deceased respondent No.30.
Let the needful be done within four weeks. Learned counsel
for the appellants submits that he would also file power of attorney
on behalf of Smt. Kirpi- proposed LR No.1(d).
List after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 03, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Surekha Kumari and others vs. Rakhi and others
CMPMO No.91 of 2025
.
02.04.2025 Present: Mr. Vinod Chauhan, Advocate, for the petitioners.
CMPMO No.91 of 2025
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the
respondents, returnable within four weeks.
CMP No.4074 of 2025
Notice in the aforesaid terms.
The applicants, in the case at hand, have filed a claim
petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The
said petition has been filed on account of death of husband of
petitioner No.1-Shri Satish Kumar in an accident. One of the facts
to be ascertained in the claim petition is the income of the
deceased. Despite best efforts on the part of the applicants, the
employer of the deceased husband of petitioner No.1, could not be
produced and the evidence of the applicants was closed on
26.06.2024.
Prima facie, from the contents of the application filed under
Order 7 Rule 14(3) of the Civil Procedure Code, whereupon the
impugned order was passed, it is evident that a good cause has
been projected to satisfy the Court qua the non production of
evidence earlier with respect to the income of the deceased. In
support of his contentions, learned counsel appearing on behalf of
the petitioners has placed reliance upon the decision of the Madras
High Court, in S. Rathinaswamy & Others vs. Smt. S.
Bhanumathi & others, AIR 2006 Madras 221.
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
In view thereof, further proceedings pending before learned
Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Sundernagar, District Mandi,
.
Himachal Pradesh, in Claim Petition No.65 of 2022, titled Surekha
Kumari and others vs. Rakhi & others, shall remain stayed till further
orders.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 02, 2025 (KS) Judge
r to
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Deepak Sood (since deceased) through LR vs. Swaran
Kanta Sood (since deceased) through LR. a/w
connected matter
.
Civil Revision No.124 of 2024 a/w
Civil Revision No.133 of 2024
Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate with Ms. Rinki
01.04.2025 Present:
Kashmiri, Advocate, for the petitioner, in CR No.124 of
2024 and for the respondent in CR No.133 of 2024.
Mr. Deepak Gupta, Advocate, for the respondent in CR
No.124 of 2024 and for the petitioner in CR No.133 of2024.
Further time prayed for by learned counsel for the
petitioner to deposit the use and occupation charges, in the case
at hand. Let the needful be done on or before the next date of
hearing.
List on 07.05.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 01, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Deepak Sood (since deceased) through LR vs. Swaran
Kanta Sood (since deceased) through LR. a/w
connected matter.
Civil Revision No.124 of 2024 a/w
Civil Revision No.133 of 2024
01.04.2025 Present: Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate with Ms. Rinki
Kashmiri, Advocate, for the petitioner, in CR No.124 of
2024 and for the respondent in CR No.133 of 2024.
Mr. Deepak Gupta, Advocate, for the respondent in CR
No.124 of 2024 and for the petitioner in CR No.133 of
2024.
Further time prayed for by learned counsel for the
petitioner to deposit the use and occupation charges, in the case
at hand. Let the needful be done on or before the next date of
hearing.
List on 07.05.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 01, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Faqir Chand and another vs. Mangat Ram and others
Civil Revision No.89 of 2024
.
01.04.2025 Present: Mr. Abhishek Nagta, Advocate, vice Mr. Parmod Singh
Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. N.K. Thakur, Senior Advocate with Mr. Karanveer
Singh Thakur, Advocate, for the respondents.
Learned counsel for the petitioners has drawn attention of
this Court to the report of the Local Commissioner, specifically
the portion placed at Page-35 of the paper-book.
From perusal of the same, it is evident that the Local
Commissioner had clearly pointed out an encroachment on the
suit land, a fact which from Annexure P-8, seems to have been
overlooked.
Faced with the aforesaid, learned counsel for the
respondents seeks time to go through the file.
List on 09.04.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 01, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
LAC, HPPWD and others vs. Shyam Lal and others
RFA No.19 of 2024
.
01.04.2025 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
appellants/State.
Mr. O.C. Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 5.
List along-with RFA No.4 of 2024.
April 01, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
LAC and others vs. Tara Wati
RFA No.61 of 2024
.
01.04.2025 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
appellants/State.
Respondent is ex parte.
Further time prayed for taking steps for the service of
respondent (post admission) within one week. On taking such
weeks.
r to
steps, issue notice to the respondent, returnable within four
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 01, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
LAC HP PWD and another vs. Milap Chand and others
CMP(M) No.5 of 2024
.
01.04.2025 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
applicants-appellants/State.
Mr. Vinod Chauhan, Advocate, for respondents No.1, 2(a)
to 2(d), 3, 4, 5 & 7 to 14.
CMP(M) No.5 of 2024
In the filing of the present appeal, there is a delay of 272
days. The same has been duly explained in the application
filed for condonation of delay. Even otherwise, while dealing
with an application for condonation of delay filed by the State,
one has to be conscious of the bureaucratic delays, impersonal
nature of the governmental functioning, institutional interest
and hence a justice oriented liberal approach has to be taken
while dealing with such applications.
In this respect, it would be appropriate to refer to
decision of the Hon’ble Apex Court passed in State of
Manipur and others vs. Koting Lamkang, 2019 (10) SCC
408. The relevant extract of the same is being reproduced
herein below:-
“7. But while concluding as above, it was necessary for
the Court to also be conscious of the bureaucratic delay
and the slow pace in reaching a government decision and
the routine way of deciding whether the State should
prefer an appeal against a judgment adverse to it. Even
while observing that the law of limitation would harshly
affect the party, the Court felt that the delay in the appeal
filed by the State, should not be condoned. against a
judgment adverse to it. Even while observing that the law
of limitation would harshly affect the party, the Court felt::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
that the delay in the appeal filed by the State, should not
be condoned.
.
8. Regard should be had in similar such circumstances to
the impersonal nature of the Government’s functioning
where individual officers may fail to act responsibly. This
in turn, would result in injustice to the institutional interestof the State. If the appeal filed by State are lost for
individual default, those who are at fault, will not usually
be individually affected”
Other than the aforesaid, it would also be appropriate to
refer to judgment dated 09.10.2023, passed in Civil Appeal
No.5867 of 2015 titled Sheo Raj Singh (deceased) through
LRs. and others vs. Union of India and another. The
relevant extract of the same is being reproduced herein
below:-.
“37. Having bestowed serious consideration to the rival
contentions, we feel that the High Court’s decision to
condone the delay on account of the first respondent’sinability to present the appeal within time, for the reasons
assigned therein, does not suffer from any error
warranting interference. As the aforementioned
judgments have shown, such an exercise of discretion
does, at times, call for a liberal and justice- oriented
approach by the Courts, where certain leeway could be
provided to the State. The hidden forces that are at work
in preventing an appeal by the State being presented
within the prescribed period of limitation so as not to allow
a higher court to pronounce upon the legality and validity
of an order of a lower court and thereby secure unholy
gains, can hardly be ignored. Impediments in the working
of the grand scheme of governmental functions have to
be removed by taking a pragmatic view on balancing ofthe competing interests.”
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Hence, for the reasons/sufficient cause stated in the
.
application & the aforesaid position of law, delay in filing the
present appeal is condoned. The application stands disposed
of.
RFA No.______/2025 (Be registered)
Admit.
Records be called for.
List for hearing in due course.
CMP No._____of 2025 ( Be registered)
During the pendency of the present appeal, operation
and execution of judgment/award dated 29.09.2022, passed by
learned Additional District Judge, Sunder Nagar, District
Mandi, H.P., in Land Reference Petition No.648 of 2013, shall
remain stayed, subject to depositing of the awarded amount
along-with up-to-date interest.
The application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 01, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Union of India vs. Bantu Devi and another
CMP(M) No.1228 of 2023 & CMP No.13056 of 2023 in
RFA No.311 of 2007
.
01.04.2025 Present: Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Senior Panel Counsel, for the
applicant/Union of India.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.2/State.
Further time prayed for taking steps for the service of
respondent No.1. Let the needful be done within two weeks. On
taking such steps, issue notice to respondent No.1, returnable
within four weeks thereafter.
List after six weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 01, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Kishori Lal vs. Balraj Kumar (deceased) through LRs.
and others
CMP(M) No.944 of 2023
.
01.04.2025 Present: Ms. Annanya Verma, Advocate, vice Mr. Sunny Modgill,
Advocate, for the applicant/appellant.
Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.1(a),
1(b), 1(d), 2(a), 2(c) and 2(d).
None for respondent No.2(b).
Respondents No.1(c) is stated to have expired.
Time for taking steps for bringing on record the LRs. of
deceased respondents No.1(c) and respondent No.2(b) is being
sought since 25.11.2024. Let steps for the service of the aforesaid
proposed LRs. of deceased respondent No.1(c) and respondent
No.2(b) be positively taken within two weeks.
On taking such steps, issue notice to the aforesaid
respondents, returnable within four weeks thereafter. It is made
clear that if steps are not taken within the aforesaid period,
present appeal shall automatically stand dismissed for non
prosecution without further reference to this Court.
List after six weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 01, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Dharam Lal @ Dharam Pal and another vs. Mahinder
Pal and others a/w connected matter
RSA No.148 of 2023 a/w
.
RSA No.295 of 2023
RSA No.148 of 2023
01.04.2025 Present: Mr. G.R. Palsra, Advocate, for appellant No.1.
Mr. Lokesh Thakur, Advocate, for appellant No.2.
Mr. Bimal Gupta, Senior Advocate with Ms. Kusum
Chaudhary, Advocate, for respondents No.1 and 2.
RSA No.295 of 2023
r to
Respondents No.4 to 23 exempted from service.
Mr. Bimal Gupta, Senior Advocate with Ms. Kusum
Chaudhary, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. G.R. Palsra, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Lokesh Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
RSA No.148 of 2023
Fresh steps for the service of respondent No.8, i.e., Ms.
Latika Kumari, be taken within one week. On taking such steps,
issue notice to the said respondent, returnable within eight
weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 01, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Bhupinder Singh vs. Surinder Pal and others
RSA No.108 of 2023
.
01.04.2025 Present: Ms. Kavita Kajal, Advocate, vice Mr. Atharv Sharma,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Ms. Amita Chandel, Advocate, for respondents No.1 & 8.
Respondents No.2 to 6 & 7(i) to 7(iv) already ex parte.
Mr. K.B. Khajuria, Advocate, for respondent No.9.
RSA No.108 of 2023
Steps for service of respondents No.2 to 6 and 7(i) to 7(iv)
(post admission) be taken within four weeks. List thereafter. In
the meanwhile, power of attorney on behalf of respondent No.9
be also filed.
CMP No.5481 of 2023
Since the record, in the case at hand, stands received,
therefore, the applicant is dispensed with from filing the certified
copy of the trial Court judgment. The application stands
disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 01, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Rameshwar Mahadev Mandir vs. Jaspal Singh Negi
and others
RSA No.65 of 2023
.
01.04.2025 Present: Mr. Virender Chauhan, Advocate, vice Mr. Surender
Saklani, Advocate, for the appellant.
Ms. Kavita Kajal, Advocate, vice Mr. Atharv Sharma,
Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Respondents No.2 and 4 are stated to have expired.
Ms. Narvada Thakur, Advocate, for respondents No.3, 5 to
7.
CMP(M) No.485 of 2024
Time for taking steps for the service of proposed LRs.
No.4(a) & 4(b) are being sought since 11.11.2024. Let steps for the
service of the aforesaid proposed LRs., by way of filing correct
address(es) and Process Fee, be positively taken within two weeks.
On taking such steps, issue notice to proposed LRs. No.4(a)
& 4(b), returnable within four weeks thereafter. It is made clear
that if steps are not taken within the aforesaid period, present
appeal shall automatically stand dismissed for non prosecution
without further reference to this Court.
List after six weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 01, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Kulvinder Suri and others vs. Chattar Singh and others
Civil Suit No.20 of 2023
.
01.04.2025 Present: Mr. Pranjal Munjal, Advocate, vice Mr. Janesh Gupta,
Advocate, for the plaintiffs.
Mr. Y.P. Sood, Advocate, for defendants No.1 to 4.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Advocate, for defendants No.5 and 6.
Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of the plaintiffs
submits that talks with the land owners other than the defendants
for an amicable settlement are at an advanced stage. He prays for
an adjournment. Prayer not opposed.
As prayed, list on 08.04.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 01, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Veena Devi vs. Durga Singh and others
RSA No.320 of 2022
.
01.04.2025 Present: Mr. Sanket Sankhyan, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Vinod Kumar Thakur and Mr. Mohar Singh, Advocates,
for respondents No.1 to 3.
Respondent No.4 is stated to have expired.
None for respondents No.5 to 8.
Further time prayed for serving respondents No.4(a) and
4(b). Let the needful be done within three weeks. List thereafter.
In the meanwhile, amended memo of parties be also filed.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 01, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Dharam Pal vs. Shahnaz Begum
Civil Suit No.58 of 2022
.
01.04.2025 Present: Ms. Rinki Kashmiri, Advocate, vice Mr. Janesh Gupta,
Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Mr. Ajay Sipahiya, Advocate, for the defendant.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the defendant
submits that order dated 13.11.2024 stands challenged before the
Division Bench, by way of an appropriate appeal. The same is
coming up before the concerned Division Bench on 07.04.2025. In
view thereof, he prays for an adjournment. Prayer not opposed.
As prayed, list on 21.04.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 01, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Rajesh Bansal and another vs. Nand Lal and others
a/w connected matter
CMPMO No.260 of 2021 a/w
.
CMPMO No.86 of 2020
CMPMO No.260 of 2021
Mr. Romesh Verma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Digvijay
01.04.2025 Present:
Singh, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Bimal Gupta, Senior Advocate with Ms. Kusum
Chaudhary, Advocate, for respondents No.3, 4(b), 5(a) &
5(c).
Ms. Meera Devi, Advocate, vice Mr. Deepak Gupta,
Advocate, for respondent No.9.
Respondents No.1, 2 and 4(a) are stated to have expired.
CMPMO No.86 of 2020
Ms. Meera Devi, Advocate, vice Mr. Deepak Gupta,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Respondents No.1, 8 and 10 are stated to have expired.
Mr. Bimal Gupta, Senior Advocate with Ms. Kusum
Chaudhary, Advocate, for respondents No.2 to 7, 9 and for
proposed legal representatives No.1(i) to 1(iii) of deceased
respondent No.1.
Mr. Romesh Verma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Digvijay
Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.6.
CMP(M) No.393 of 2025 in CMPMO No.260 of 2021
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the legal
heirs of deceased respondent No.2, details whereof have been
given in Paragraph-1 of the application, returnable within four
weeks.
CMP(M) No.394 of 2025 in CMPMO No.260 of 2021
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the legal
heirs of deceased respondent No.1, details whereof have been
given in Paragraph-2 of the application, returnable within four
weeks.
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
CMP No.5443 of 2025
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
.
applicants. The non-applicants have no objection, if in case the
present application is allowed and the name of deceased
respondent No.4(a)-Bela Garag is ordered to be deleted from the
array of the parties. Respondent No.4(a)-Bela Garag is stated to
have expired on 17.07.2024. Her legal heirs are stated to be
already on record as respondents No.4(b) to 4(d).
In view of the aforesaid, since the right to sue survives in the
aforesaid legal heirs of deceased respondent No.4(a)-Bela Garag,
therefore, the application is allowed. Name of respondent No.4(a)-
Bela Garag is ordered to be deleted from the array of the
respondents, subject to just all exceptions.
Amended memo of parties be filed within four weeks. The
application stands disposed of.
CMPMO No.86 of 2020
Further time prayed for bringing on record the legal heirs of
deceased respondents No.1, 8 and 10. Let the needful be done
within four weeks. List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 01, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Jagdish Kumar vs. Parmod Gautam (deceased)
through LRs.
CMPMO No.64 of 2020
.
01.04.2025 Present: Mr. Vishwas Kaushal, Advocate, vice Mr. Vivek Negi,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Tek Chand, Advocate, for all the LRs. of deceased
respondent No.1.
Amended memo of parties be filed on or before the next
r to
date of hearing. List on 07.04.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 01, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Shiv Om Thakur vs. Kavita Negi Thakur and others
CMPMO No.622 of 2019
.
01.04.2025 Present: Mr. Ashok Kumar Verma, Advocate, vice Mr. Aditya
Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Parikshit Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Respondents No.2 to 5 ex parte vide order dated
22.05.2023.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.6/State.
Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner
submits that learned original counsel is unavailable today on
account of bereavement in his family. He seeks an adjournment.
Prayer not opposed.
As prayed, list the matter after three weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 01, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Gurcharan Singh vs. Gian Singh and others
CMPMO No.457 of 2019
COPC No.249 of 2019
.
01.04.2025 Present: Mr. Rohit, Advocate, vice Mr. Sumit Sood, Advocate, for
the petitioner.
Mr. Surya Chauhan, Advocate, for respondents No.1, 2,
3(b) to 3(e).
Mr. Sat Prakash, Advocate, for respondent No.3(a).
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents No.1,
2, 3(b) to 3(e) seeks time to file fresh power of attorney on their
behalf as the original counsel has now been designated as
Senior Advocate. Prayer not opposed.
Let the needful be done within four weeks. List thereafter.
In the meanwhile, parties to ascertain the status of the
proceedings pending before the trial Court.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 01, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Anirudh Singh vs. Sohan Singh and others
CMPMO No.164 of 2019
.
01.04.2025 Present: Mr. Amrik Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Ashok Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Abhishek Sood,
Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Hitesh Kumar, Advocate, vice Mr. Ajay Thakur,
Advocate, for respondents No.2 to 4.
Mr. Balwinder Singh, Advocate, for respondents No.5 to
15.
On account of death of learned original counsel appearing
on behalf of the petitioner, Mr. Amrik Singh, Advocate seeks time
to have instructions.
As prayed, list on 21.04.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 01, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Ghanshyam Dass (since deceased) through LRs. And
another vs. Mahendra Singh Chawala and others
RFA No.240 of 2016
.
01.04.2025 Present: Ms Sanjivini Sood, Advocate, vice Mr. Arjun Lall,
Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Sunil Chauhan, Advocate, for respondents No.2 and 3.
Respondents No.1 and 8 are stated to have expired.
Names for respondents No.4 and 6 stand deleted.
RFA No.240 of 2016
None for respondents No.5(a), 5(b), 7, 9 and 10.
Let consequential steps for bringing on record the legal
heirs of deceased respondents No.1 and 8 be taken within eight
weeks. List thereafter.
CMP No.10682 of 2024
Rejoinder, as prayed, be filed on or before the next date of
hearing.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 01, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Om Prakash Atri (deceased) through LRs. vs. Om
Kumar and others
RSA No.361 of 2014
.
01.04.2025 Present: Mr. Hemant Kumar Thakur, Advocate, for the appellants,
except appellant No.1.
Appellant No.1 is stated to have expired.
Mr. H.S. Rangra, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Respondents No.2 and 3 are stated to have expired.
Mr. Rohit, Advocate, vice Mr. Jagan Nath, Advocate, for
respondents No.4(a) to 4(c).
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of appellants No.2
and 3 submits that objections in the application filed for bringing
on record the legal heirs of deceased appellant No.1 would be
removed during the course of the day. Post removal of the
objections, let the application be placed on record.
Insofar as respondents No.2 and 3 are concerned, present
appeal stands abated qua them.
List after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 01, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Vikrant Singh and another vs. Guddo Devi and another
RSA No.326 of 2014
.
01.04.2025 Present: Mr. Balwant Singh Thakur, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Sunil Mohan Goel, Senior Advocate with Mr. Abhinav
M. Goel, Advocate, for the respondents.
As jointly prayed, list on 01.05.2025.
April 01, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Kaka (deceased) through LRs. vs. Joginder Singh
Chela
RSA No.368 of 2008
.
01.04.2025 Present: Mr. Shekhar Badola and Ms. Vishali Lakhanpal,
Advocates, vice Mr. Parav Sharma, Advocate, for the
appellants.
Dr. Lalit Kumar Sharma, Advocate, for proposed legal
heirs of deceased sole respondent.
CMP(M) No.2 of 2025 & CMP(M) No.1 of 2025
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicants. The non-applicants have no objection, if in case, the
applications are allowed and the legal heirs of deceased sole
respondent- Joginder Singh Chela, are brought on record as is
being sought in the application (CMP(M) No.1 of 2025).
Sole respondent- Joginder Singh Chela is stated to have
expired on 25.07.2024. The same is evident from the Death
Certificate appended along with the application (CMP(M) No.1 of
2025) as Annexure MA-1. Sole respondent- Joginder Singh
Chela is survived by his legal heirs, details whereof, have been
given in Paragraph-2 of the application (CMP(M) No.1 of 2025).
The same is in consonance with the details of the legal heirs
given in Legal Heirs Certificate appended along with the
application (CMP(M) No.1 of 2025) as Annexure MA-2.
Since the right to sue inheres/survives with the legal heirs of
deceased respondent- Joginder Singh Chela, details whereof,
have been given in Paragraph-2 of the application (CMP(M) No.1
of 2025), therefore, they are ordered to be brought on record.
For the bona fide reasons stated/sufficient cause shown in
the application (CMP(M) No.2 of 2025), delay in bringing on
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
record the legal heirs of deceased respondent- Joginder Singh
.
Chela, is condoned and abatement, if any, is set aside.
The applications stand disposed of. Amended memo of
parties filed with the applications is ordered to be taken on record.
RSA No.368 of 2008
List for hearing in due course.
April 01, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Prashant Dharmani vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Cr.MP(M) No.709 of 2025
.
01.04.2025 Present: Mr. Prashant Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
Notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate
General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the
respondent-State and seeks time to file status report.
List on 02.05.2025. Status report be filed on or before the
next date of hearing.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 01, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Harish Kumar vs. Naresh Kumar
CMPMO No.126 of 2025
.
01.04.2025 Present: Mr. Abhishek Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
As prayed, list on 03.04.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 01, 2025 (KS) Judge
r to
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Bishan Dass and another vs. Devi Chand (deceased)
through LRs. and others
RSA No.60 of 2025
.
01.04.2025 Present: Mr. Rajesh Mandhotra, Advocate, for the appellants.
As prayed, list after two weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 01, 2025 (KS) Judge
r to
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Hari Ram Barali vs. Bimla Devi and others
RSA No.59 of 2025
.
01.04.2025 Present: Ms. Manjit Kaur, Advocate, vice Mr. Naveen Kumar
Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the appellant.
Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant
submits that their file stands misplaced and they need to re-
construct the same. As such, adjournment is prayed for.
April 01, 2025 (KS)
As prayed, list after four weeks.
r ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Manju Bala vs. Raj Kumar
CMPMO No.108 of 2025
.
01.04.2025 Present: Mr. Shubham Sood, Advocate, for the petitioner.
At the request of learned counsel for the petitioner, list
after two weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 01, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Kundan Lal and another vs. Divisional Manager, HP
Forest Development Corporation and others
CMPMO No.43 of 2025
.
01.04.2025 Present: Mr. H.S. Rangra, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Abhishek Nagta, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
CMP No.2600 of 2025
Reply, if any, be filed within four weeks.
CMPMO No.43 of 2025
List for consideration after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 01, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Ram Kumar vs. Surjeet Kaur and others
CMPMO No.36 of 2025
.
01.04.2025 Present: Mr. Anshul Jairath, Advocate, for the petitioner.
At the request of learned counsel appearing on behalf of
the petitioner, list on 07.04.2025.
April 01, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:38 :::CIS
Dayal Chand and another vs. Land Acquisition
Collector, HPPWD and others
CMP Nos.25035 & 25036 of 2024 in RFA No.341 of
.
2015
28.03.2025 Present: Ms. Naveen K. Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the applicants/
appellants, except appellant No.2, who is stated to have
expired.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the non-applicants/respondents.
CMP No.25035 of 2024
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicants. The non-applicants have no objection, if in case, the
application is allowed and the legal heirs of deceased appellant
No.2- Jindu are brought on record as is being sought in the present
application. Appellant No.2-Jindu has expired on 25.02.2019. The
same is evident from the Death Certificate appended along-with
present application as Annexure A-2.
The right to sue inheres/survives in the legal heirs of
deceased appellant No.2- Jindu. Details of the legal heirs of
deceased appellant No.2- Jindu are given in Legal Heirs Certificate,
i.e., Annexure A-3 appended along with the present application.
One of the legal heirs mentioned in the Legal Heirs
Certificate, i.e., Annexure A-3 appended along-with present
application at running page-147 of the paper book, is Bhimi Ram.
He is also stated to have died on 18.04.2021. The said fact is
evident from the Death Certificate, i.e., Annexure A-1 appended
along with the present application. The details of the legal heirs of
deceased Bhimi Ram are given in Legal Heirs Certificate, i.e.,
Annexure A-4 appended along with the present application.
In view thereof, right to receive compensation survives with
the legal heirs of said Bhimi Ram. As a consequence of the
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
aforesaid, Khairu Ram, Lal Chand, Thakri Devi, Rami Devi,
.
Gambhiri Devi and legal heirs of deceased Bhimi Ram, i.e., Bhagi
Ram, Rakesh Kumar, Kheli Devi and Rami Devi, are brought on
record.
Amended memo of parties appended with the present
application is ordered to be taken on record.
The application stands disposed of.
CMP No.25036 of 2024
Learned Additional Advocate General submits that no further
proceedings against the judgment passed in the main appeal dated
01.08.2018 is pending adjudication before the Apex Court.
Other than the aforesaid, learned Additional Advocate
General submits that they have no objection if in case the amount
lying deposited in this Registry of this Court along-with proportionate
interest accrued thereupon, is released in favour of the applicants.
The instructions so filed vide communication dated
21.03.2025 are taken on record.
Other than the aforesaid, for the reasons stated in the
application, the same is allowed. The amount lying deposited in the
Registry of this Court along-with proportionate interest accrued
thereupon is ordered to be released in favour of the applicants in
terms of their shares. The amount be remitted to the bank accounts,
details whereof, have been given in Paragraph-7 of the application,
subject to proper verification. The application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 28, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Bullu Ram and others vs. Prabh Dyal
RSA No.526 of 2010
.
28.03.2025 Present: Dr. Lalit K. Sharma, Advocate, for the appellants, except
appellant No.1, who is stated to have expired.
Mr. Vikrant Chandel, Advocate, for the respondent.
Learned counsel for the respondent submits that appellant
No.1 has died. Faced with the aforesaid, learned counsel for the
r to
appellants seeks time to have instructions in this respect and if in
case appellant No.1 has died, then he undertakes to take
consequential steps for bringing on record the legal heirs of
deceased appellant No.1 within four weeks. List after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 28, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
National Highway Authority of India vs. Bachhitar
Singh and another
Arbitration Appeal No.166 of 2024
.
28.03.2025 Present: Ms. Sneh Bhimta, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Yuyutsu Singh Thakur, Advocate, for the respondents.
As jointly prayed, list for consideration on 14.05.2025.
March 28, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Collector, Land Acquisition vs. Paras Ram and another
RFA No.84 of 2017
.
28.03.2025 Present: Ms. Shreya Chauhan, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Naveen K. Bhardwaj, Advocate, for respondent No.1,
who is stated to have expired, respondents No.2 to 10 and
11, who is stated to have expired.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.12/State.
CMP No.5291 of 2025
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is
allowed. The factum of death of respondent No.1-Paras Ram is
taken on record. The application stands disposed of.
CMP No.5293 of 2025
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is
allowed. The factum of death of respondent No.11-Smt. Shaeri is
taken on record. The application stands disposed of.
RFA No.84 of 2017
Let consequential steps for bringing on record the legal
heirs of deceased respondents No.1 and 11 be taken within four
weeks. List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 28, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Collector, Land Acquisition vs. Paras Ram and another
RFA No.90 of 2017
.
28.03.2025 Present: Ms. Shreya Chauhan, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Naveen K. Bhardwaj, Advocate, for respondent No.1,
who is stated to have expired.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.2/State.
CMP No.5259 of 2025
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is
allowed. The factum of death of respondent No.1-Paras Ram is
taken on record. The application stands disposed of.
RFA No.90 of 2017
Let consequential steps for bringing on record the legal
heirs of deceased respondent No.1 be taken within four weeks.
List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 28, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Madan Lal and others vs. Kalawati
Civil Revision No.73 of 2022
.
28.03.2025 Present: Mr. Somesh Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Karun Negi,
Advocate, for the petitioners.
Ms. Dhanwanti, Advocate, vice Mr. Sanjay Bhardwaj,
Advocate, for the respondent.
CMP No.5254 of 2025
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is
allowed. Certified copies of the amended plaint and written
statement filed before the trial Court are ordered to be taken on
record.
The application stands disposed of.
Civil Revision No.73 of 2022
Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks time to place on
record the other relevant documents, i.e., certified copies of the
proceedings pending before the trial Court, in the case at hand.
Let the needful be done within four weeks. List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 28, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Ramesh Kumar vs. Sanjeev Kumar
Cr. Revision No.310 of 2024
.
28.03.2025 Present: Mr. B.R. Kashyap, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms. Anita Mokta, Advocate, for the respondent.
Cr.MP No.882 of 2025
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is
allowed. Time for depositing 5% of the cheque amount as costs
before the Himachal Pradesh State Legal Services Authority,
Shimla, in terms of judgment dated 10.01.2025, passed in
Criminal Revision No.310 of 2024, is extended by four weeks
from today, i.e., 28.03.2025.
The application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 28, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Hira Lal vs. HRTC and another
Execution Petition No.62 of 2025
.
28.03.2025 Present: Ms. Mamta Garg, Advocate, vice Mr. Vikas Rajput,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Dheeraj K. Vashishta, Advocate, for the respondents.
Learned counsel for the respondents seeks time to file
reply/instructions. Let the needful be done on or before the next
r to
date of hearing. List on 08.05.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 28, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Bhawani Dutt vs. State of HP and others
RFA No.57 of 2016 a/w RFA No.136 of 2016
.
28.03.2025 Present: Mr. Arvind Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant(s), in both
the appeals.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondents No.1, 2 and 4/State.
Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocate, for respondent No.3/NTPC.
CMP No.24701 of 2024 in RFA No.57 of 2016 and
CMP No.24702 of 2024 in RFA No.136 of 2016
For the reasons stated in the applications, early hearing of
the appeals is allowed. The applications stand disposed of.
RFA No.57 of 2016 and RFA No.136 of 2016
List for hearing in the second week of July, 2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 28, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Banti Devi and another vs. Rakesh Sharma and others
CMP No.24569 of 2024 in
RSA No.314 of 2022
.
28.03.2025 Present: None for the appellants.
Mr. Navlesh Verma, Advocate, for the applicants/
respondents No.1 and 2.
Mr. Surender Verma, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
Mr. Shashi Shirshoo, Senior Panel Counsel, for
respondent No.4.
Mr. Arvind Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.5.
Let the applicants place on record the judgment and
decree in furtherance whereof release of amount by way of
present application is being sought. Let the needful be done
within four weeks. List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 28, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Chaman Lal vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Cr.MP(M) No.2948 of 2024
.
28.03.2025 Present: Mr. Anil Kumar Manget and Mr. Rajinder Gulati,
Advocates, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State
HC/ASI Prem Chand Pal No.65, I/O Police Post, Chail,
Police Station, Kandaghat, District Solan, Himachal Pradesh, is
present along with record.
Status report stands filed. The same is taken on record.
Copy, whereof, has been supplied to learned counsel for the
petitioner, who intends to go through the same.
List for consideration on 02.05.2025. Let the complainant
be informed about the next date of hearing through the concerned
Police Station.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 28, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
State of HP and others vs. Arjan and others
CMP(M) No.2134 of 2024
.
28.03.2025 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
applicants-appellants/State
Mr. Virender Kumar, Advocate, vice Mr. Vivek Chandel,
Advocate, for the non-applicants/respondents.
CMP(M) No.2134 of 2024
In the filing of the present appeal, there is a delay of 57
days. The same has been duly explained in the application
filed for condonation of delay. Even otherwise, while dealing
with an application for condonation of delay filed by the State,
one has to be conscious of the bureaucratic delays, impersonal
nature of the governmental functioning, institutional interest
and hence a justice oriented liberal approach has to be taken
while dealing with such applications.
In this respect, it would be appropriate to refer to
decision of the Hon’ble Apex Court passed in State of
Manipur and others vs. Koting Lamkang, 2019 (10) SCC
408. The relevant extract of the same is being reproduced
herein below:-
“7. But while concluding as above, it was necessary for
the Court to also be conscious of the bureaucratic delay
and the slow pace in reaching a government decision and
the routine way of deciding whether the State should
prefer an appeal against a judgment adverse to it. Even
while observing that the law of limitation would harshly
affect the party, the Court felt that the delay in the appeal
filed by the State, should not be condoned. against a
judgment adverse to it. Even while observing that the law
of limitation would harshly affect the party, the Court felt::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
that the delay in the appeal filed by the State, should not
be condoned.
.
8. Regard should be had in similar such circumstances to
the impersonal nature of the Government’s functioning
where individual officers may fail to act responsibly. This
in turn, would result in injustice to the institutional interestof the State. If the appeal filed by State are lost for
individual default, those who are at fault, will not usually
be individually affected”
Other than the aforesaid, it would also be appropriate to
refer to judgment dated 09.10.2023, passed in Civil Appeal
No.5867 of 2015 titled Sheo Raj Singh (deceased) through
LRs. and others vs. Union of India and another. The
relevant extract of the same is being reproduced herein
below:-.
“37. Having bestowed serious consideration to the rival
contentions, we feel that the High Court’s decision to
condone the delay on account of the first respondent’sinability to present the appeal within time, for the reasons
assigned therein, does not suffer from any error
warranting interference. As the aforementioned
judgments have shown, such an exercise of discretion
does, at times, call for a liberal and justice- oriented
approach by the Courts, where certain leeway could be
provided to the State. The hidden forces that are at work
in preventing an appeal by the State being presented
within the prescribed period of limitation so as not to allow
a higher court to pronounce upon the legality and validity
of an order of a lower court and thereby secure unholy
gains, can hardly be ignored. Impediments in the working
of the grand scheme of governmental functions have to
be removed by taking a pragmatic view on balancing ofthe competing interests.”
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Hence, for the reasons/sufficient cause stated in the
application & the aforesaid position of law, delay in filing the
.
present appeal is condoned. Application stands disposed of.
RSA No.______/2025
Be registered.
List with similar matters on 10.04.2025.
CMP No._____of 2025
Be registered.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 28, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
State of HP and another vs. Tej Singh
CMP(M) No.1428 of 2024
.
28.03.2025 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
applicants-appellants/State
Mr. Amit Kumar Dhumal and Ms. Parul Negi, Advocates,
for the non applicant/ respondent.
Reply is stated to have been filed on behalf of the non-
applicant today in the Registry of this Court. Let objection(s), if
any, in the reply be removed and the same be placed on record
well before the next date of hearing.
List along-with similar matters on 10.04.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 28, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
M/s Shri Guru Hargobind Steel Industries and others
vs. M/s Prontos Private Limited and another
Criminal Revision No.53 of 2025
.
28.03.2025 Present: Mr. Rahul Mahajan, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.2/State.
Cr.MP No.1008 of 2025
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is
allowed. Time granted for deposit of 50% of the compensation
amount in terms of order dated 20.01.2025 is extended by a
period of four weeks from today. The application stands disposed
of.
Cr. Revision No.53 of 2025
List on 01.05.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 28, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
M/s Shri Guru Hargobind Steel Industries and others
vs. M/s Prontos Private Limited and another
Criminal Revision No.46 of 2025
.
28.03.2025 Present: Mr. Rahul Mahajan, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.2/State.
Cr.MP No.1006 of 2025
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is
allowed. Time granted for deposit of 50% of the compensation
amount in terms of order dated 20.01.2025 is extended by a
period of four weeks from today. The application stands disposed
of.
Cr. Revision No.46 of 2025
List on 01.05.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 28, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
M/s Shri Guru Hargobind Steel Industries and others
vs. M/s Prontos Private Limited and another
Criminal Revision No.55 of 2025
.
28.03.2025 Present: Mr. Rahul Mahajan, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.2/State.
Cr.MP No.1007 of 2025
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is
allowed. Time granted for deposit of 50% of the compensation
amount in terms of order dated 20.01.2025 is extended by a
period of four weeks from today. The application stands disposed
of.
Cr. Revision No.55 of 2025
List on 01.05.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 28, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
M/s Shri Guru Hargobind Steel Industries and others
vs. M/s Prontos Private Limited and another
Criminal Revision No.48 of 2025
.
28.03.2025 Present: Mr. Rahul Mahajan, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.2/State.
Cr.MP No.1005 of 2025
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is
allowed. Time granted for deposit of 50% of the compensation
amount in terms of order dated 20.01.2025 is extended by a
period of four weeks from today. The application stands disposed
of.
Cr. Revision No.48 of 2025
List on 01.05.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 28, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
M/s Shri Guru Hargobind Steel Industries and others
vs. M/s Prontos Private Limited and another
Criminal Revision No.49 of 2025
.
28.03.2025 Present: Mr. Rahul Mahajan, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.2/State.
Cr.MP No.1004 of 2025
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is
allowed. Time granted for deposit of 50% of the compensation
amount in terms of order dated 20.01.2025 is extended by a
period of four weeks from today. The application stands disposed
of.
Cr. Revision No.49 of 2025
List on 01.05.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 28, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
M/s Shri Guru Hargobind Steel Industries and others
vs. M/s Prontos Private Limited and another
Criminal Revision No.50 of 2025
.
28.03.2025 Present: Mr. Rahul Mahajan, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.2/State.
Cr.MP No.1003 of 2025
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is
allowed. Time granted for deposit of 50% of the compensation
amount in terms of order dated 20.01.2025 is extended by a
period of four weeks from today. The application stands disposed
of.
Cr. Revision No.50 of 2025
List on 01.05.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 28, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
M/s Shri Guru Hargobind Steel Industries and others
vs. M/s Prontos Private Limited and another
Criminal Revision No.52 of 2025
.
28.03.2025 Present: Mr. Rahul Mahajan, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.2/State.
Cr.MP No.1002 of 2025
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is
allowed. Time granted for deposit of 50% of the compensation
amount in terms of order dated 20.01.2025 is extended by a
period of four weeks from today. The application stands disposed
of.
Cr. Revision No.52 of 2025
List on 01.05.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 28, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
M/s Shri Guru Hargobind Steel Industries and others
vs. M/s Prontos Private Limited and another
Criminal Revision No.54 of 2025
.
28.03.2025 Present: Mr. Rahul Mahajan, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.2/State.
Cr.MP No.1001 of 2025
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is
allowed. Time granted for deposit of 50% of the compensation
amount in terms of order dated 20.01.2025 is extended by a
period of four weeks from today. The application stands disposed
of.
Cr. Revision No.54 of 2025
List on 01.05.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 28, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
M/s Shri Guru Hargobind Steel Industries and others
vs. M/s Prontos Private Limited and another
Criminal Revision No.45 of 2025
.
28.03.2025 Present: Mr. Rahul Mahajan, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.2/State.
Cr.MP No.1000 of 2025
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is
allowed. Time granted for deposit of 50% of the compensation
amount in terms of order dated 20.01.2025 is extended by a
period of four weeks from today. The application stands disposed
of.
Cr. Revision No.45 of 2025
List on 01.05.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 28, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
M/s Shri Guru Hargobind Steel Industries and others
vs. M/s Prontos Private Limited and another
Criminal Revision No.47 of 2025
.
28.03.2025 Present: Mr. Rahul Mahajan, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.2/State.
Cr.MP No.999 of 2025
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is
allowed. Time granted for deposit of 50% of the compensation
amount in terms of order dated 20.01.2025 is extended by a
period of four weeks from today. The application stands disposed
of.
Cr. Revision No.47 of 2025
List on 01.05.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 28, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
M/s Shri Guru Hargobind Steel Industries and others
vs. M/s Prontos Private Limited and another
Criminal Revision No.44 of 2025
.
28.03.2025 Present: Mr. Rahul Mahajan, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.2/State.
Cr.MP No.998 of 2025
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is
allowed. Time granted for deposit of 50% of the compensation
amount in terms of order dated 20.01.2025 is extended by a
period of four weeks from today. The application stands disposed
of.
Cr. Revision No.44 of 2025
List on 01.05.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 28, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
M/s Shri Guru Hargobind Steel Industries and others
vs. M/s Prontos Private Limited and another
Criminal Revision No.51 of 2025
.
28.03.2025 Present: Mr. Rahul Mahajan, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.2/State.
Cr.MP No.997 of 2025
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is
allowed. Time granted for deposit of 50% of the compensation
amount in terms of order dated 20.01.2025 is extended by a
period of four weeks from today. The application stands disposed
of.
Cr. Revision No.51 of 2025
List on 01.05.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 28, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Agya Ram vs. Kamla Devi and others
Civil Revision No.69 of 2018
.
27.03.2025 Present: Ms. Rajni Gandhi, Advocate, vice Mr. Rajiv Rai, Advocate,
for the petitioner.
Mr. Dinesh Bhanot, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Mukesh Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.3 to 8.
None for respondents No.2(a) to 2(e).
Learned counsel for respondent No.1 submits that he
would furnish the address of respondent No.14 to the petitioner
within one week. On furnishing the same, let steps for the service
of respondent No.14 be taken within another two weeks. List
thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 27, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Harminder Singh and another vs. Hako (deceased)
through LRs. and others
RSA No.106 of 2004
.
27.03.2025 Present: Mr. Divya Raj Singh, Advocate, for the appellants.
Appeal against respondents No.1 and 7 stands abated
vide order dated 16.05.2024 and 27.12.2022, respectively.
None for resondents No.2(a) to 2(c).
Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Tarun Brakta,
Advocate, for respondents No.3 to 6.
List the matter on 02.04.2025 to consider the effect of
abatement in terms of order dated 18.03.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 27, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Salig Ram and others vs. Roop Chand and another
RSA No.267 of 2023
.
27.03.2025 Present: Mr. Dinesh Singh Chauhan, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Jagat Pal, Advocate, vice Mr. Dinesh Kumar,
Advocate, for the respondents.
Learned counsel for the parties submit that there is a
possibility of amicable settlement between the parties and the
matter be referred to the mediation.
On the request of learned counsel for the parties, the
matter is sent for mediation. With the consent of the learned
counsel for the parties, Mr. G.D. Verma, learned Senior
Advocate, is appointed as Mediator in this matter.
Learned counsel for the parties to appear before the
Mediator in the Main Mediation Centre, H.P. High Court, on
02.04.2025 at 11:00 a.m., who shall fix a date for presence of
parties thereafter. The official Coordinator, High Court Main
Mediation Centre shall render all assistance to learned Mediator.
List the matter before the Court after receipt of report of
learned Mediator.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 27, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Jiwan Singh vs. Saroj Bala a/w connected matter
RSA No.191 and 384 of 2022
.
27.03.2025 Present: Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ajeet Pal
Singh Jaswal, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Sanjeev Kuthiala, Senior Advocate with Mr. Dhruv
Kuthiala, Advocate, for the respondents.
As jointly prayed, list after four weeks.
March 27, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Pyare Chand vs. State of HP and others
RSA No.33 of 2025
.
27.03.2025 Present: Mr. Sudhir Bhatnagar, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondents/State.
At the request of learned counsel for the appellant, list
after one week.
March 27, 2025 (KS)
to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Rajesh Kumar and others vs. Onkar (deceased)
through LR.
RSA No.153 of 2024
.
27.03.2025 Present: Mr. Naresh Sharma, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Argun Sehgal, Advocate, for the respondent.
CMP No.9373 of 2024
By way of indulgence, one last opportunity of filing reply is
weeks.
r to
given to the non-applicant to do the needful. List after four
It is made clear that if no reply is filed on or before the next
date of hearing, then the right to file the same shall stand closed
without further reference to this Court.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 27, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
NTPC Limited vs. Jagdish and others
Civil Revision No.130 of 2024
.
27.03.2025 Present: Mr. Ajeet Pal Singh Jaswal, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Surender Verma, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 9.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.10/State.
As jointly prayed, list after six weeks.
March 27, 2025 (KS)
to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Pritha Sharma and another vs. Janak Raj Sharma and
others
Civil Revision No.67 of 2024
.
27.03.2025 Present: Mr. Sumit Raj Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Jeevesh Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
As jointly prayed, list after six weeks.
March 27, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Kuldeep Chand vs. Rasila Ram and others
Civil Revision No.47 of 2024
.
27.03.2025 Present: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Tarun Brakta,
Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. K.S. Banyal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Uday Banyal,
Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 6 and 8.
As jointly prayed, list on 22.04.2025.
March 27, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Naresh Kumar and others vs. Baldev and another
RSA No.40 of 2009
.
27.03.2025 Present: Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Ishan Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.1(a),
1(b) and 3.
CMP No.5119 of 2025
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicants.
25.07.2024.
r to
Respondent No.1(a)-Vyasa Devi has died on
The same is evident from the Death Certificate
appended along-with present application.
The right to sue inheres/survives in the legal heirs of
deceased respondent No.1(a)-Vyasa Devi. Since the legal heir of
deceased respondent No.1(a)-Vyasa Devi, i.e., Sonu @ Arvind is
already on record as respondent No.1(b), therefore, the present
application is allowed. Name of respondent No.1(a)-Vyasa Devi is
ordered to be deleted from the array of the parties, subject to just all
exceptions.
Amended memo of parties appended with the present
application is ordered to be taken on record.
The application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 27, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
The Principal Secretary Revenue to the Govt. of HP
and others vs. Sant Ram and others
CMP(M) No.314 of 2025
.
27.03.2025 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
applicants-appellants-State.
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the
respondents, returnable within four weeks.
March 27, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Narinder vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Cr.MP(M) No.265 of 2025
.
27.03.2025 Present: Mr. Manoj Pathak, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
ASI Avtar Singh, Police Station, Chirgaon, District Shimla,
Himachal Pradesh, is present along with record.
Status report stands filed. The same is taken on record.
Copy, whereof, has been supplied to learned counsel for the
petitioner, who intends to go through the same.
List for consideration on 24.04.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 27, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Sahil Thakur vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Cr.MP(M) No.242 of 2025
.
27.03.2025 Present: Mr. Rakesh Chauhan, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
SI/SHO Ghanshyam, Police Station, Deha, District Shimla,
Himachal Pradesh, is present along with record.
Status report stands filed. The same is taken on record.
Copy, whereof, has been supplied to learned counsel for the
petitioner, who intends to go through the same.
List for consideration on 23.04.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 27, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Munish Kumar vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Cr.MP(M) No.189 of 2025
.
27.03.2025 Present: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
ASI Ajay Kumar, Police Station, Sadar Chamba, Himachal
Pradesh, is present along with record.
Status report stands filed. The same is taken on record.
Copy, whereof, has been supplied to learned counsel for the
petitioner, who intends to go through the same.
List for consideration on 21.04.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 27, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Padam Chand and others vs. Assistant Collector and
another
CMPMO No.6 of 2025
.
27.03.2025 Present: Ms. Vandana Misra, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.1/State.
Mr. N.D. Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. H.C. Sharma,
Advocate, for respondent No.2/applicant in CMP No.5211
of 2025.
CMP No.5211 of 2025
r to
Reply be filed on or before the next date of hearing. As
already fixed, list on 04.04.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 27, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Amin Chand vs. Jagat Ram (deceased) through LRs.
and others
CMP(M) No. 2080 of 2024 in
.
RSA No.269 of 2009
27.03.2025 Present: Mr. K.D. Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vivek Singh
Thakur, Advocate, for the applicant.
Mr. Jai Ram Sharma, Advocate, for the non-applicants.
Reply is stated to have been filed on behalf of the non-
applicants. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that he has
received the copy of the same and seeks time to file rejoinder
thereto. However, the reply is not on record.
Let the needful be done within four weeks. List thereafter.
It be ensured that the reply and rejoinder, post removal of
objection(s), if any, are placed on record well before the next date
of hearing.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 27, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
State of Himachal Pradesh vs. Naginder and others
CMP(M) No.1642 of 2024
.
27.03.2025 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
appellant/applicant-State.
CMP(M) No.1642 of 2024
As per Office report, respondents No.7, 10, 11, 19, 21, 22,
24 and 25 are reported to have died. Let consequential steps for
bringing on record the legal heirs of the aforesaid deceased
respondents be taken within four weeks.
Insofar as respondent No.6(d), i.e., Kumari Nisha is
concerned, fresh steps for the service of her LRs., be taken within
three days. On taking such steps, issue notice to respondent
No.6(d), returnable within four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 27, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Prithvi Singh and another vs. The Principal Secretary
(Power) to the Government of H.P. and others
CMP(M) No.1527 of 2024
.
27.03.2025 Present: Mr. Ashok Kumar Tyagi, Advocate, for the applicant/
appellant.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondents No.1 to 3/State.
Mr. Yashveer Singh Rathore, Advocate, for respondent
No.4.
r to
CMP(M) No.1527 of 2024
Till date, reply has not been filed. In terms of order dated
12.03.2025, right to file the same stands closed.
Heard counsel for the parties. For the sufficient cause
shown in the application, the same is allowed. Delay of 165 days
in filing the appeal, is condoned. The application stands disposed
of.
RFA No.______of 2025
Be registered.
Admit.
Call for the records.
List for hearing in due course.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 27, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Priyanka Devi vs. Abnish Chandel
CMPMO No.666 of 2024
.
27.03.2025 Present: Mr. Yudhbir Singh Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
CMPMO No.666/2024
Further time prayed for moving an appropriate application
for serving the respondent by way of affixation and/or substituted
services. Let the needful be done within one week. List
thereafter.
CMP No.5158 of 2024
r to
The petition, in the case at hand, has been filed for
transfer of the divorce petition filed by the respondent, from the
Court of Additional Principal Judge (Family Court), Sarkaghat,
District Mandi to the Court of Additional District & Sessions
Judge-cum- Family Court, Sundernagar, District Mandi. The copy
of the petition for divorce has been appended along with present
petition as Annexure P-2. The address of the respondent has
been stated in the cause title therein. For effecting service,
notices on previous occasions were sent by this Court on the
address mentioned by the respondent in his divorce petition
which is sought to be transferred.
From the report of service, it is evident that the respondent
is evading service. In view thereof, further proceedings pending
before the Court of learned Additional Principal Judge, Family
Court, Sarkakhat, District Mandi, in H.M. Misc. Petition
No.103/2024, are stayed till further orders.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 27, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Suresh Kumar vs. Meena Kumari
CMPMO No.543 of 2024
.
27.03.2025 Present: Mr. R.L. Chaudhary, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raju Ram Rahi, Advocate, for the respondent.
Further time sought by learned counsel for the petitioner to
have instructions in terms order dated 10.03.2025.
As prayed, list on 09.04.2025.
March 27, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Desh Raj vs. HRTC and another
Execution Petition No.348 of 2024
.
27.03.2025 Present: Ms. Mamta Garg, Advocate, vice Mr. Vikas Rajput,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms. Shrutika Chauhan, Advocate, vice Mr. Dheeraj K.
Vashishta, Advocate, for the respondents.
In similar petitions, following order has been passed by a
Division Bench of this Court:-
“This Court, over a period of time, is not only
flooded but also choked with the execution petitions
that are being filed against certain monopolisticBoards and Corporations like the HRTC, HPSEB
etc.
The common ground taken in all these
cases by such authorities for non-execution of
orders/judgments that have attained finality, is thefinancial crunch/financial constraints.
We really wonder as to why at the first place
such monopolistic Corporations/Boards went intothe red and suffered losses. We are not oblivious to
the fact that earlier also, some of such institutions
had to be closed down, only because they were no
longer viable.
It is, therefore, high time that the State
introspects its policies, more particularly, with
regard to the subsidies and policies in general,
restructures its Boards and Corporations so as to
tide over the financial crunch.
We observe so, because even in matters
regarding judicial infrastructure where the State
hardly has to contribute 10% and 90% is
contributed by the Central Government, the State
Government has been expressing its inability to pay
the matching grant due to financial crunch.
Here also in these cases, despite the orders
having attained finality and thereafter clear cut
directions having been passed in the execution
petitions, such orders have still not been::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
implemented by the HRTC only for want of
finances. This is despite the fact that an additional.
grant of Rs.100 crores has been made by the State
Government to the HRTC.
As observed above, it is high time that State
introspects and devises a mechanism so as to
ensure that all the Boards and Corporations that are
in the red become self-sufficient, self reliant and do
not have to unnecessarily go to the StateGovernment with a begging bowl which in turn shall
ensure that the orders of the Court are duly
complied with and the Officers of theBoards/Corporations are not unnecessarily made to
face harassment for no fault of theirs.
We could have conveniently initiated
contempt proceedings, but looking into the state of
affairs prevailing in the State, we refrain from doingso, with the hope and trust that the State
Government, as noticed above, would introspect
and submit a road map to this Court so as to ensurethat not only the orders passed by this Court are
timely complied with, but also ensure that theofficers manning these Boards and Corporations
are not made to face unnecessary harassment,especially when they are not at fault as the
governance of the State does not lie in their hands.
List on 5th May, 2025. In the meanwhile, we
hope and trust that all the dues as outstandings
towards the petitioner(s) are paid to them, or else,
this Court may be constrained to take coercive
action to recover the same.
Execution Petition No.337 of 2024
De-linked.”
List on 08.05.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 27, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Limited
vs. Naveen and others
CMPMO No.287 of 2024
.
27.03.2025 Present: Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms. Divya Rajta, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Ms. Shailja Thakur, Advocate, for respondents No.2 and 3.
As jointly prayed, list after six weeks.
March 27, 2025 (KS)
to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Ravi Thakur vs. Sukhwinder Singh Sukhu
Civil Suit No.30 of 2024
.
27.03.2025 Present: Ms. Narvada, Advocate, vice Mr. Dikken Kumar, Advocate,
for the plaintiff.
Mr. Navlesh Verma, Advocate, for the defendant.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the defendant
submits that an application for extension of time for filing written
statement had been filed. However, the same is not on record.
Registry to trace the application so filed and place it on
record well before the next date of hearing, post removal of
objection(s), if any.
List after two weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 27, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Rajesh vs. Babu Ram (deceased) through LRs.
Civil Revision No.118 of 2024
.
27.03.2025 Present: Mr. Y.P. Sood, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Yash P. Sharma, Advocate, for the respondents.
As jointly prayed, list for consideration after six weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 27, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Jagdeesh Chand (deceased) through LRs. vs. Lachhmi
Nand (deceased) through LRs. and others
RSA No.26 of 2024
.
27.03.2025 Present: Mr. Rahul Mahajan, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Sudhir Thakur, Senior Advocate with Mr. Somesh
Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.1, 2(a), 4 to 6 and
8 to 10.
Ms. Leena Guleria, Advocate, for respondents No.3, 7 and
11 to 13.
RSA No.26 of 2024
r to
Admitted on the substantial questions of law Nos.2, 5, 7 &
8, formulated at Pages-34, 34(a) & 34(b) of the paper book.
Records of the Courts below be called for.
List for hearing in due course.
CMP No.2163 of 2024
During the pendency of the appeal, parties shall maintain
status quo qua possession and alienation of the suit land.
CMP No.7099 of 2024
In view of the interim orders passed in CMP No.2163 of
2024, present application has become infructuous.
CMP No.2599 of 2024
Since the documents, in question, already form part of the
record, therefore, they are permitted to be taken on record. The
application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 27, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Rattnu (deceased) through LRs. vs. Kalawati
(deceased) through LRs. and others
RSA No.304 of 2023
.
26.03.2025 Present: Mr. Bhupinder Gupta, Senior Advocate with Ms. Rinki
Kashmiri, Advocate, for the appellants.
Name of respondent No.1 stands deleted.
Ms. Neha Negi, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
Mr. Romesh Verma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sumit
Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.3(a), 3(b), 4(a) to
4(e).
Admitted on the substantial questions of law Nos.1 to 5,
formulated at Pages-15 to 17 of the paper book.
List for hearing in due course.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 26, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Chuhar Singh (deceased) through LRs. vs. Milkha
Singh (deceased) through LRs. and another
CMPMO No.33 of 2025
.
26.03.2025 Present: Mr. P.S. Goverdhan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rakesh
Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate with Ms. Rinki
Kashmiri, Advocate, for respondents No.1(a) to 1(g).
At the request of learned counsel for the petitioner, list in
r to
the fourth week of April, 2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 26, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Chuni Lal vs. Parkash Chand
CMPMO No.568 of 2024
.
26.03.2025 Present: Ms. Shailja Kumari, Advocate, vice Mr. Neel Kamal
Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Vivek Singh Thakur, Advocate, for the respondent.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that learned
original counsel who was to argue the case is unavailable today
Prayer not opposed.
r to
on account of personal difficulty. He seeks an adjournment.
As prayed, list after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 26, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
New India Assurance Company Limited vs. Parveen
Sood and another
CMPMO No.548 of 2024
.
26.03.2025 Present: Mr. B.M. Chauhan, Senior Advocate with Ms. Kamakshi
Tarlokta, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Bunesh Pal, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Naveen Kumar Bhardwaj, Advocate, for respondent
No.2.
CMPMO No.548 of 2024
List after four weeks.
CMP No.17222 of 2024
In the meanwhile, further proceedings pending before the
Commissioner, Employees Compensation-II, Shimla, in Case
No.15-6 of 2024, shall remain stayed.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 26, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Keshav Ram vs. Land Acquisition Collector, Koldam,
Bilaspur and another
CMPMO No.219 of 2024
.
26.03.2025 Present: Mr. Ashir Kaith, Advocate, vice Mr. Hamender Singh
Chandel, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.1/State.
Mr. Rajat Kumar, Advocate, vice Mr. Ramesh Sharma,
Advocate, for respondent No.2.
CMP No.5086 of 2025
r to
Learned counsel for the parties jointly submit that the
question which arises for consideration, in the case at hand, is
akin to the one which arises for consideration in CMPMO No.220
of 2024.
In view thereof, list the present petition along with CMPMO
No.220 of 2024.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 26, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Chamaroo (deceased) through LR and another vs. Om
Chand
RSA No.172 of 2024
.
26.03.2025 Present: Mr. Jagan Nath, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Ajay Chandel, Advocate, for the respondent.
Records of the Courts below be called for. List after six
weeks.
March 26, 2025 (KS)
to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Digjinder Singh and others vs. Bala Dutt
Civil Revision No.166 of 2024
.
26.03.2025 Present: Mr. Amit Singh Chandel, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. B.L. Soni and Mr. Nitin Soni, Advocates, for the
respondent.
In the case at hand, two orders have been challenged, one
under Order 9 Rule 9, which in terms of Order 43 of the Civil
Procedure Code, is appealable and the other under Order 9 Rule
7 of the Civil Procedure Code. Since the order under Order 9
Rule 7 of the Civil Procedure Code does not finally terminate the
proceedings, therefore, a challenge to the same under Section
115 of the Civil Procedure Code, is not prima facie maintainable.
Learned counsel for the petitioner to justify the maintainability of
the present petition.
As prayed, list on 07.04.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 26, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Chaudhary Ram vs. Gurdass and another
RSA No.154 of 2024
.
26.03.2025 Present: Mr. Gurmeet Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the appellant.
Ms. Himani Verma, Advocate, for the respondents.
CMP No.9374 of 2024
Time for filing reply is being sought since 20.11.2024. The
same be positively filed on or before the next date of hearing. List
after four weeks.
It is made clear that if no reply is filed on or before the next
date of hearing, then the right to file the same shall stand closed
without further reference to this Court.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 26, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Ravinder Panwar & others vs. Varinder and others
RSA No.327 of 2008
.
26.03.2025 Present: Mr. Vishwas Kaushal, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Romesh Verma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sumit
Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.1 & 2.
None for respondents No.3(a) to 3(c), 3(e) and 3(g).
Respondent No.3(d) is stated to have expired.
CMP(M) No.647 of 2024
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicants. The non-applicants have no objection, if in case, the
application is allowed and the legal heirs of deceased respondent
No.3-Bhagwan Dass, are brought on record as is being sought in
the present application. Legal heirs of deceased respondent No.3-
Bhagwan Dass have been served. No one has put in
appearance on their behalf.
Heard counsel for the parties. Deceased respondent No.3-
Bhagwan Dass is stated to have expired on 28.01.2018. The
details of the legal heirs of deceased respondent No.3-Bhagwan
Dass are given in Paragraph-2 of the application.
Since the right to sue inheres/survives with the legal heirs of
deceased respondent No.3-Bhagwan Dass, details whereof, have
been given in Paragraph-2 of the present application, therefore,
they are ordered to be brought on record.
For the bona fide reasons stated/sufficient cause shown in
the application, delay in bringing on record the legal heirs of
deceased respondent No.3-Bhagwan Dass, is condoned and
abatement, if any, is set aside.
The application stands disposed of.
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
CMP(M) No.2008 of 2024
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
.
applicants. The non-applicants have no objection, if in case, the
application is allowed and the legal heirs of deceased respondent
No.3(d)-Jagdish, are brought on record as is being sought in the
present application. Legal heirs of deceased respondent No.3(d)-
Jagdish have been served. No one has put in appearance on
their behalf.
Heard counsel for the parties. Deceased respondent
No.3(d)-Jagdish is stated to have expired on 20.12.2003. The
details of the legal heirs of deceased respondent No.3(d)-Jagdish
are given in Paragraph-5 of the application.
Since the right to sue inheres/survives with the legal heirs of
deceased respondent No.3(d)-Jagdish, therefore, they are ordered
to be brought on record.
The application stands disposed of.
RSA No.327 of 2008
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the newly
added respondents, returnable within four weeks.
List after four weeks. In the meanwhile, amended memo of
parties be filed.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 26, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Malkiat Singh and another vs. Janki Devi
RSA No.171 of 2009
.
26.03.2025 Present: Mr. Rahul Gathania, Advocate, vice Mr. Sanjeev Sood,
Advocate, for the appellants.
Sole respondent is stated to have expired.
CMP No.12050 of 2024
Despite service of legal heirs of deceased Janki Devi in
CMP(M) No.1857 of of 2023, i.e., Ravinder Kumar, Surinder Kumar
r to
and Ms. Sukanya Devi, they have not put in appearance either in
person or through their counsel. In the same application,
Sukanya Devi is yet to be served. In the absence of the aforesaid
Ms.
individuals, before this Court directions against them disclosing the
name(s) and address(s) of legal heirs of Sushil Kumar is
meaningless. The application stands disposed of.
CMP No.1976 of 2025
For the reasons stated in the application, let legal heirs of
Sushil Kumar, i.e., Sudesh Thakur in CMP(M) No.1046 of 2024 be
served by way of affixation of summons at the last known address
and by way of registered post. Similarly, legal heirs of Janki Devi,
i.e., Ms. Sukanya Devi be served in CMP(M) No.1857 of 2023 by
way of affixation of summons at the last known address and by way
of registered post. The application stands disposed of.
RSA No.171 of 2009
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the legal
heirs of deceased Sushil Kumar and Janki Devi, by way of affixation
as directed in CMP No.1976 of 2025, returnable within four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 26, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
LAC and others vs. Sanjay and another
RFA No.369 of 2019
.
26.03.2025 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
appellants/State.
Ms. Shashi Kiran, Advocate, vice Mr. Rupinder Singh,
Advocate, for respondents No.1 and 2.
Mr. Rakesh Thakur, Advocate, for the applicant in CMP
Nos.5598 and 5599 of 2024.
CMP No.5598 of 2024
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant
seeks time to place on record the judgment and decree passed
by the Civil Court as also judgment, if any, in appeal(s) carried
out therefrom, whereby rights have been conferred upon the
applicant qua the land in question. Let the needful be done within
four weeks. List thereafter.
CMP No.5599 of 2024
Till date, reply has not been filed. In temrs of order dated
07.03.2025 right to file the reply stands closed.
List for consideration a/w CMP No.5598 of 2024 after four
weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 26, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Shivkant and others vs. Sat Paul and another
CMPMO No.157 of 2019
.
26.03.2025 Present: Mr. Divya Raj Singh, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Atharv Sharma, Advocate, for the respondents.
Further time prayed by learned counsel for the parties to
ascertain the status of the main matter pending before the Trial
Court. Let the needful be done on or before the next date of
hearing. r
List on 02.04.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 26, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
M/s Jaiprakash Industries vs. Hari Ram and another
RFA No.280 of 2017
.
26.03.2025 Present: Mr. Romesh Verma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sumit
Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Virender Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.2/State.
Mr. Anil God, Advocate, for the UltraTEch Cement/ newly
added respondent No.3.
CMP(M) No.2137 of 2024
For the sufficient cause shown in the application, the
same is allowed. Delay in filing the Cross-Objection, is
condoned. The application stands disposed of.
Cross Objection No.______ of 2025
Be registered.
List after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 26, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
M/s Jaiprakash Associates Limited vs. Punnu Ram
(deceased) through LRs. and another
RFA No.72 of 2017
.
26.03.2025 Present: Mr. Romesh Verma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sumit
Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Virender Thakur, Advocate, for the proposed LRs. Of
deceased respondent No.1.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.2/State.
Mr. Anil God, Advocate, for the UltraTEch Cement/ newly
added respondent No.3.
CMP(M) No.46 of 2025 in CO No.1 of 2023
Since the Cross-Objections stand already registered as
CO No.1 of 2023, therefore, the present application has become
infructuous.
CMP No.2149 of 2023
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicant. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is
allowed. The UltraTEech Cement, through its Unit Head/ In-
charge, Village Baga, Post Office, Kandhar, Tehsil Arki, District
Solan, H.P., is arrayed as respondent No.3, in the case at hand.
Amended memo of parties be filed within four weeks.
The application stands disposed of.
RFA No.72 of 2017 & CO No.1 of 2023
Mr. Anil God, Learned Advocate puts in appearance on
behalf of the newly added respondent No.3.
List after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 26, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Vikrant Sood vs. Ram Kumar Sood and others
Civil Revision No.86 of 2015
.
26.03.2025 Present: Mr. Anuj Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. G.C. Gupta, Senior Advocate with Ms. Meera Devi,
Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 4.
None for respondents No.5 & 6.
Respondent No.7 already proceeded against ex parte.
CMP No.23352 of 2024
Reply and rejoinder are stated to have been filed.
However, the same are not on record.
Registry to trace the reply and rejoinder so filed and place
them on record well before the next date of hearing, post removal
of objection(s), if any.
CMP No.13899 of 2024
Pleadings are complete. To be heard along-with the main
petition.
Civil Revision No.86 of 2015
List for hearing on 07.05.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 26, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Sameer Kumar vs. Onkar Singh and another
RSA No.585 of 2010
.
26.03.2025 Present: Mr. Atharv Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant/applicant
in CMP(M) No.356/2025.
Ms. Vandana Kumari, Advocate, for respondent No.1, who
is stated to have expired.
None for respondent No.2.
CMP(M) No.356 of 2025 & CMP(M) No.357 of 2025
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the legal
heirs of deceased respondent No.1, detailed in Paragraph-2 of
the application (CMP(M) No.357 of 2025), returnable within four
weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 26, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Sunehru Devi vs. Narender Kumar and others
RSA No.609 of 2009
.
26.03.2025 Present: Mr. Romesh Verma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Digvijay
Singh, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Vivek Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.1, 4 and
5.
Mr. Vishwas Kaushal, Advocate, for respondents No.3(a)
to 3(d).
Respondents No.2(a) to 2(c) stand served, however, there
is no appearance on their behalf. Hence, they are proceeded
against ex parte.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents
No.3(a) to 3(d) seeks time to file power of attorney. Let the
needful be done within three weeks. List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 26, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Basant Singh (deceased) through LRs. vs. Kishan
Dayal (deceased) through LRs. and others
RSA No.187 of 2007
.
26.03.2025 Present: Mr. Basant Pal Thakur, Advocate, for the appellants.
None for the respondents.
Let steps for the service of legal heirs of deceased
respondent No.1(a)-Smt. Brahmo Devi, who have been brought
on record vide order dated 05.07.2024, be taken within three
days. On taking such steps, issue notice to the said legal heirs,
returnable within four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 26, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Krishan Singh and others vs. Joginder Singh
(deceased) through LRs. and others
RSA No.172 of 2006
.
26.03.2025 Present: Mr. Basant Pal Thakur, Advocate, for the appellants,
except appellant No.1, who is stated to have expired.
Ms. Amita Chandel, Advocate, vice Ms. Rachna Kuthiala,
Advocate, for respondents No.1(a) to 1(f).
Further time prayed for bringing on record the legal heirs
weeks. List thereafter.
r to
of deceased appellant No.1. Let the needful be done within four
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 26, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
HPSIDC Ltd. vs. Kewal Solvent Ltd. and others
RFA No.53 of 2024
.
26.03.2025 Present: Mr. Sachin Sunail, Advocate, vice Mr. Chandan Goel,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant
seeks time to ascertain the address of respondent No.1 and its
Director from the Registrar of Companies. Let the needful be
r to
done within two weeks. List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 26, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Om Prakash and others vs. M/s Vardhman Textile Mills
Ltd.
RSA No.252 of 2024
.
25.03.2025 Present: Mr. Bhim Raj Sharma, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. R.L. Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Arjun Lall,
Advocate, for the respondent.
At the request of learned counsel for the appellants, in
order to enable him to prepare the case, list for consideration, at
the stage of admission, on 25.04.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 25, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Riyaz Mohd. vs. Khem Raj
RSA No.246 of 2024
.
25.03.2025 Present: Mr. Prashant Chauhan, Advocate, vice Mr. Sarthak Mehta,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Bhupinder Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Pranjal
Munjal, Advocate, for the respondents.
At the request of learned counsel for the appellant, list the
matter after four weeks.
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
March 25, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Chet Ram and others vs. State of HP and others
RSA No.207 of 2024
.
25.03.2025 Present: Mr. Nishant Khidtta, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondents/State.
Learned counsel for the appellants submits that he intends
to go through the record.
As prayed, list after six weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 25, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Subhash Chand (deceased) through LRs. and others
vs. Subhash Chand and another
CMPMO No.47 of 2025
.
25.03.2025 Present: Mr. Karan Singh Kanwar, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Ankit Dhiman, Advocate, for respondents No.1 and 2.
CMP No.2201 of 2025
Reply, as prayed, be filed within four weeks. List
r to
thereafter. Interim order to continue.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 25, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
State of HP and others vs. Sachin Kumar
RSA No.36 of 2025
.
25.03.2025 Present: Mr. Manish Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for the
appellants.
Ms. Tim Saran, Advocate, for the respondent.
Learned Deputy Advocate General submits that similar
matters are posted for 10.04.2025, therefore, prays for listing of
List on 10.04.2025.
r to
the same on the said date. Prayer allowed.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 25, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Pavnesh Kumar vs. Navneet Sharma and others
RSA No.32 of 2025
.
25.03.2025 Present: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Jaswal, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Rajesh Mandhotra, Advocate, for respondent No.10.
At the request of learned counsel for the appellant, in order
to enable him to prepare the case, list after four weeks.
March 25, 2025 (KS)
to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Nisar Mohd. vs. Nanak and others
CMPMO No.407 of 2024
.
25.03.2025 Present: Mr. Bimal Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Aman Thakur,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Respondents No.1 to 4 proceeded against ex parte vide
order dated 19.11.2024.
Mr. Karan Singh Kanwar, Advocate, for respondents No.2
to 4.
r to
Mr. Karan Singh Kanwar, learned Advocate has put in
appearance on behalf of respondents No.2 to 4. He seeks time
to file power of attorney. Let the needful be done within two
weeks. List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 25, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Subhash vs. State of HP and others a/w connected
matter
CMPMO No.400 of 2024 a/w
.
CMPMO No.401 of 2024
25.03.2025 Present: Mr. Divya Raj Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner(s), in both
the petitions.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondents No.1 & 3/State, in both the petitions.
Ms. Lalita Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.2, 4 & 5,
in both the petitions.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the private
respondents submits that learned Senior Counsel who was to
argue the case is unavailable today on account of personal
difficulty. She seeks an adjournment. Prayer not opposed.
List after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 25, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Ganga Ram vs. Shyam Sunder
RSA No.224 of 2024
.
25.03.2025 Present: Mr. Ashwani Negi, Advocate, vice Mr. Dibender Ghosh,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Himanshu Panwar, Advocate, for the respondent.
CMP No.14721 of 2024
Since this application has been disposed of vide order
RSA No.224 of 2024
r to
dated 23.09.2024, therefore, no order is required to be passed.
List after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 25, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Sanjay and another vs. Puran Chand and others
RSA No.170 of 2024
.
25.03.2025 Present: Mr. Sameer Thakur, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Rajesh Mandhotra, Advocate, for respondents No.1
and 2.
None for respondents No.3(i) to 3(iv).
Admitted on the substantial questions of law No.2 and 3,
formulated at Pages-23 and 24 of the paper book.
List for hearing in due course.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 25, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Harminder Singh and another vs. Hako (deceased)
through LRs. and others
RSA No.106 of 2004
.
25.03.2025 Present: Mr. Divya Raj Singh, Advocate, for the appellants.
Appeal against respondents No.1 and 7 stands abated
vide order dated 16.05.2024 and 27.12.2022, respectively.
None for resondents No.2(a) to 2(c).
Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Tarun Brakta,
Advocate, for respondents No.3 to 6.
Further time prayed on behalf of the appellants to consider
the matter in the light of order dated 18.03.2025. Prayer not
opposed. List on 27.03.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 25, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Mahant Onkar Nath (deceased) through LRs. Vs, A.G.
Himachal Pradesh
RFA No.109 of 2003
.
25.03.2025 Present: Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. K.D. Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vivek Singh
Thakur, Advocate, for the respondents.
Learned counsel for the appellants submits that learned
Senior Counsel who was to argue the case is unavailable today
on account of personal difficulty.
r He seeks an adjournment.
Prayer not opposed.
As prayed, list on 09.04.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 25, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Hem Chand vs. Hans Raj
Civil Suit No.70 of 2024
.
25.03.2025 Present: Mr. G.D. Verma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sumit Sharma,
Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Mr. Kulwant Singh Katoch, Advocate, for the defendant.
OMP No.922 of 2024
Pleadings are complete.
OMP No.252 of 2025
Learned counsel for the applicant-plaintiff seeks time to file
replication. Let the needful be done on or before the next date of
hearing. List for consideration along-with OMP No.922 of 2024,
on 08.04.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 25, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Vijaya Gupta and others vs. Kamal Kumar Gupta and
others
RSA No.45 of 2025
.
25.03.2025 Present: Mr. T.S. Chauhan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Surya
Chauhan, Advocate, for the appellants.
At the request of learned Senior Counsel, list after two
weeks.
March 25, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Land Acquisition Collector vs. Guro @ Gurbachan
Singh
CMP No.4802 of 2025 in RFA
.
No.713 of 2012
25.03.2025 Present: Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the appellant/State.
Mr. Jai Ram Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Rajinder Kumar
Sharma, Advocate, for the respondents/applicants.
CMP No.4802 of 2025
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-applicant.
The non-applicant has no objection, if in case, the application is
allowed and the legal heirs of deceased sole respondent-Guro @
Gurbachan Singh are brought on record as is being sought in the
present application.
Heard counsel for the parties. Sole respondent-Guro @
Gurbachan Singh is stated to have expired on 15.12.2014. The
same is evident from the Death Certificate appended along with the
present application as Annexure A-2. The respondent is survived by
five legal heirs, namely Harbhajan Singh, Partap Singh, Harbhajan
Kaur, Krishna Devi and Vidhya Devi. The same is evident from
Legal Heirs Certificate appended along with the present application
as Annexure P-1. It is evident that the only legal heirs who are
entitled to succeed to the immovable property of the deceased
respondent, are Partap Singh and Harbhajan Singh, details whereof,
have been given in Paragraph-2 of the application.
Since the right to receive compensation, in the case at
hand, has accrued upon the legal heirs of deceased respondent,
namely Partap Singh and Harbhajan Singh, therefore, they are
ordered to be brought on record.
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
The application stands disposed of. Amended memo of parties
.
filed along-with present application is ordered to be taken on
record.
CMP No.4804 of 2025
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-applicant.
The non-applicants has no objection if in case the amount lying
deposited in this Registry of this Court along-with proportionate
interest accrued thereupon, is released in favour of the applicants.
The appeal, in the case at hand, was decided on 01.06.2016.
It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
applicants that no further proceedings against the said decision are
pending before the Hon’ble Apex Court.
Other than the aforesaid, for the reasons stated in the
application, the same is allowed. The amount lying deposited in the
Registry of this Court along-with proportionate interest accrued
thereupon is ordered to be released in favour of the applicants in
terms of their shares. The amount be remitted to the bank accounts,
details whereof, have been given in Paragraph-3 of the application,
subject to proper verification. The application stands disposed of.
CMP No.4803 of 2025
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is
allowed. The applicant is exempted from filing the English
translated copies of the documents in question.
The application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 25, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Sunil Kumar Panta vs. Vijay Singh Khurana
Cr.MP No.967 of 2025 in Cr. Revision No.1 of 2022
.
25.03.2025 Present: Mr. I.S. Chandel, Advocate, for the non-
applicant/petitioner.
Mr. D.S. Nainta and Mr. P.M. Negi, Advocate, for the
applicant/respondent.
Cr.MP No.967/2025
The drawer of the cheque/non-applicant/petitioner was held
entitled to refund of entire compensation amount along-with interest
@ 6% per annum vide judgment dated 19.11.2024. The aforesaid
amount was to be paid within 30 days from the said date.
Previously, an application being Cr.MP No.97 of 2025 was
filed by the petitioner, seeking refund of the aforesaid amount. On
08.01.2025, when the said application was listed, respondent,
through counsel admitted the liability of paying a sum of
Rs.2,00,000/- with interest accrued thereupon from 14.02.2023 and
undertook to deposit the said amount within eight weeks thereafter.
On the said date, the matter was ordered to be listed in the fourth
week of March, 2025.
Today, the present application has been filed on behalf of the
applicant/respondent, seeking extension of time for depositing the
aforesaid amount.
In the facts and attending circumstances of the case at hand,
time to deposit the amount in terms of judgment dated 19.11.2024 is
further extended by two weeks from today, i.e., 25.03.2025.
However, it is made clear that no further time shall be granted to the
applicants to do the needful.
The application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 25, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Ritesh Kumar vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Cr.MP(M) No.315 of 2025
.
25.03.2025 Present: Mr. Anubhav Chopra, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State
H.C. Ramesh Chand No.125, Police Station, Nerwa,
District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, is present along with record.
Status report stands filed. The same is taken on record.
Copy, whereof, has been supplied to learned counsel for the
petitioner, who intends to go through the same.
List for consideration on 08.04.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 25, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
The Land Acquisition Collector and others vs. Rattan
Lal and another
CMP(M) Nos.167 & 166 of 2025
.
in RFA No.56 of 2018
25.03.2025 Present: Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
appellants/non-applicants/State.
Mr. Rakesh Thakur, Advocate, for the respondents/applicants.
CMP(M) Nos.167 & 166 of 2025
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicants. The non-applicants have no objection, if in case, the
applications are allowed and the legal heirs of deceased
respondent No.2-Balk Ram, are brought on record as is being
sought in the application (CMP(M) No.166 of 2025).
The appeal, in the case at hand, was decided on
05.09.2018. Both counsels submit that no further proceedings
against the said decision, as on date, are pending before the
Hon’ble Apex Court.
Respondent No.2 is stated to have expired on 11.10.2016.
The same is evident from the Death Certificate appended along
with the application (CMP(M) No.167 of 2025) as Annexure R-1.
Respondent No.2 is survived by his legal heirs, details whereof,
have been given in Paragraph-2 of the application (CMP(M)
No.166 of 2025). The same is in consonance with the details of
the legal heirs given in Legal Heirs Certificate appended along
with the application (CMP(M) No.167 of 2025).
Since the right to receive compensation, in the case at
hand, has accrued upon the legal heirs of the aforesaid deceased
respondent No.2, therefore, the applications are allowed.
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
The legal heirs of deceased respondent No.2-Balk Ram, are
.
ordered to be brought on record.
For the bona fide reasons stated/sufficient cause shown in
the application (CMP(M) No.167 of 2025), delay in bringing
on record the legal heirs of deceased respondent No.2, is
condoned and abatement, if any, is set aside.
The applications stand disposed of. Amended memo of
parties filed with the applications is ordered to be taken on record.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 25, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Jeet Bahadur vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Cr.MP(M) No.110 of 2025
.
25.03.2025 Present: Mr. Karan Kapoor, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State
ASI Kulwant Singh, I/O Police Station, Dhalli, District
Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, is present along with record.
Status report stands filed. The same is taken on record.
Copy, whereof, has been supplied to learned counsel for the
petitioner, who intends to go through the same.
List for consideration on 09.04.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 25, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Renuka Ji Dam and another vs. Jai Pal Singh and
others
CMP Nos.20548 & 20549 of 2024 in
.
RFA No.39 of 2019
25.03.2025 Present: Mr. Digvijay Singh Kanwar, Advocate, vice Mr. Yashveer
Singh Rathore, Advocate, for the non-applicants/
appellants.
Mr. Vaibhav Kanwar, Advocate, for the applicants/
respondents.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents
submits that in terms of order dated 20.12.2024, appropriate
applications have been filed in the Registry of this Court for
bringing better particulars on record with respect to deceased
respondents No.6 and 8. If in order, let the same be placed on
record on or before the next date of hearing.
List on 02.04.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 25, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Parveen vs. Jasveer Singh
CMPMO No.501 of 2024
.
25.03.2025 Present: Mr. Anil Chauhan, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Parmod Singh Thakur and Ms. Vasundhara Kainthla,
Advocates, for the respondent.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent
submits that there is a possibility of amicable settlement between
the parties.
In this respect, learned counsel for the petitioner
seeks time to have instructions.
Let specific instructions, as to whether mediation is
possible, in the case at hand, be sought on or before the next
date of hearing.
List on 02.04.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 25, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Mohinder Singh vs. Milap Chand and others
CMP(M) No.339 of 2024
.
25.03.2025 Present: Mr. Saurabh Ahluwalia, Advocate, for the applicant.
None for respondents No.1 to 4.
In terms of order dated 24.12.2024, appropriate publication
for effecting service upon respondents No.5 and 6 had been
made in the newspaper, “Amar Ujala” Himachal Pradesh edition
dated 25.03.2025. However, no one has put in appearance on
behalf of respondents No.5 & 6. Hence, they are proceeded
against ex parte.
At the request of learned counsel appearing on behalf of
the applicant, list after six weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 25, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Gopal Singh and another vs. Shiv Devi and others and
connected matter
RSA No.206 of 2010 a/w RSA No.216 of 2010
.
RSA No.206 of 2010
24.03.2025 Present: Mr. Sanjeev Sood, Advocate, for appellant No.1.
None for appellant No.2.
Mr. Bhupinder Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Janesh
Gupta and Ms. Rinki Kashmiri, Advocates, for respondents
No.1 to 6.
Respondents No.10(a) to 10(c) ex parte.
Name of respondent No.17 stands deleted.
RSA No.216 of 2010
Mr. Sanjeev Sood, Advocate, for appellant No.1.
None for appellant No.2.
Mr. Bhupinder Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Janesh
Gupta and Ms. Rinki Kashmiri, Advocates, for respondents
No.1 to 6.
Learned counsel for the parties submit that there is a
possibility of an amicable settlement between the parties. As
prayed, list on 03.04.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 24, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Jagmohan Sood vs. Vijay Sood and others
CMPMO No.96 of 2023
.
24.03.2025 Present: Mr. Sumit Sood, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. G.C. Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Deepak Gupta,
Avocate, for the respondents.
As jointly prayed, list on 01.04.2025.
March 24, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Kuldeep Singh vs. Manjeet Singh and others
RSA No.51 of 2025
.
24.03.2025 Present: Mr. Sanjeev Kuthiala, Senior Advocate with Mr. Druv
Kuthiala, Advocate, for the appellant.
RSA No.51 of 2025
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the
respondents, on substantial questions of law No.2, 3 and 5
formulated at Pages-12 and 13 of the paper book, returnable
within four weeks.
Records be called for.
CMP No.4886 of 2025
Notice in the aforesaid terms.
In the meanwhile, status quo qua nature, possession of
the suit land shall be maintained.
CMP No.4887 of 2025
Allowed and the applicant is exempted from filing certified
copy of the judgment dated 11.09.2017, at this stage, subject to
filing of the same within seven days, as and when directed to do
so.
The application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 24, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Sushma vs. Sanjay Wadwa and others
CMPMO No.413 of 2024
.
24.03.2025 Present: Mr. Jeevan Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Atul Kumar, Advocate, for the respondents.
Further time prayed for placing on record the additional
documents. As prayed, list after four weeks.
March 24, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Tara Devi vs. Vikas Sharma and another
RSA No.243 of 2024
.
24.03.2025 Present: Mr. Rakesh Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Sanjay Prashar, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
None for respondent No.2.
Record stands received.
Learned counsel for the parties intend to go through the
same. r
List for consideration after six weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 24, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
NTPC Limited vs. Nanki (deceased) through LRs. and
others
Civil Revision No.207 of 2024
.
24.03.2025 Present: Mr. Bhupinder Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Janesh
Gupta and Ms. Rinki Kashmiri, Advocates, for the
petitioner.
Mr. Varun Rana, Advocate, for respondents No.1 and 2.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.3/State.
Learned vice counsel for the private respondents seeks
time to file power of attorney.
As prayed, list after six weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 24, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Mast Ram vs. Sandeep Kumar and others
RSA No.107 of 2024
.
24.03.2025 Present: Mr. Karan Singh Kanwar, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Bhupinder Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Janesh
Gupta and Ms. Rinki Kashmiri, Advocate, for the
respondents.
At the request of learned counsel for the appellant, in order
to enable him to prepare the case, list after six weeks.
r ( Bipin C. Negi )
March 24, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Ram Swaroop vs. Union of India and another
RSA No.78 of 2024
.
24.03.2025 Present: Mr. Rajul Chauhan, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Veer Bahadur Verma, Central Government Counsel,
for the respondents/ Union of India.
CMP No.5187 of 2024
Replication, if any, be filed within four weeks. List
thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 24, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Gangi Devi and others vs. Gokal
Civil Revision No.69 of 2024
.
24.03.2025 Present: Mr. Bhender Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Sanjeev Kuthiala, Senior Advocate with Mr. Druv
Kuthiala, Advocate, for the respondent.
At the request of learned counsel for the petitioner, in
order to enable him to prepare the case, list after six weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 24, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
LAC and others vs. Tara Wati
RFA No.61 of 2024
.
24.03.2025 Present: Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the appellants/State.
Respondent is ex parte.
Admit.
On taking steps within three days, issue post admission
notice to the respondent, returnable within four weeks.
Records be called for.
List for hearing in due course.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 24, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Praveen Kumar Sharma vs. Renu Kumar
CMPMO No.42 of 2024
.
24.03.2025 Present: Mr. Karan Singh Kanwar, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Ajay Kochhar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vivek Sharma
and Varun Chauhan, Advocates, for the respondent.
Further time payed to comply with order dated 16.12.2024.
Let the needful be done on or before the next date of hearing.
List on 07.04.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 24, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Dhani Ram (since deceased) through LRs. vs.
Prithvipal Singh (since deceased) through LRs.
.
RSA No.34 of 2024
24.03.2025 Present: Mr. Atharv Sharma, Advocate, for the appellants, except
appellant No.1(i), who is stated to have expired.
Mr. Dheeraj K. Vashisht, Advocate, for the respondents.
RSA No.34 of 2024
Further time payed for filing legible copies of the
documents in question. Let the needful be done within four
weeks. List thereafter.
CMP No.2697 of 2024
To be heard along-with main appeal.
CMP Nos.2696 & 2698 of 2024
Pleadings are complete. At the request of learned counsel
for the applicant/appellant, list for consideration after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 24, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Pushpa Devi and others vs. Amit Kumar and others
RFA No.8 of 2001 a/w CO No.119 of 2021
.
24.03.2025 Present: Mr. Bhupinder Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Janesh
Gupta and Ms. Rinki Kashmiri, Advocate, for the
appellants.
Mr. Anuj Gupta, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Anand Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Karan
Sharma, Adocate, for respondent No.2.
Mr. N.S. Chandel, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vinod Gupta,
Advocate, for respondent No.3(a).
Mr. Sahil Dixit, Advocate, for respondents No.4(a) to 4(c).
Name of respondent No.3(b) stands deleted.
Arguments heard.
Judgment reserved. The written arguments be filed within
one week.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 24, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
.
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Balak Ram and others vs. Bhandaru and others a/w
connected matter
.
RFA No.170 of 2010 a/w RFA No.473 of 2015
24.03.2025 Present: Mr. Virender Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant(s).
Mr. Shubham Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. Nand Lal
Chauhan, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 3, 5(a) to 5(c)
in RFA No.170 of 2010 and respondents No.4(a) to 4(c) in
RFA No.473 of 2015.
Respondent No.4 in RFA No.170 of 2010 already
proceeded against ex parte vide order dated 29.10.2010.
At the request of learned vice counsel appearing on behalf
of the private respondents, list for hearing on 21.04.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 24, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Narpat Ram vs. Rajeshwari Devi and others a/w
connected matter
.
CMPMO No.606 of 2023 a/w
Cr.MMO No.1166 of 2023
24.03.2025 Present: Mr. Virender Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner, in
CMPMO No.606 of 2023 and for the respondent in
Cr.MMO No.1166 of 2023.
Mr. Parikshit Sharma, Advocate, for respondents in
CMPMO No.606 of 2023 and for the petitioner in Cr.MMO
No.1166 of 2023.
As jointly prayed, list for consideration after two weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 24, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Sunil @ Sonu and others vs. Competent Authority-
cum-Collector and others a/w connected matter
.
CMPMO No.468 of 2023 a/w
CMPMO No.555 of 2023
24.03.2025 Present: Mr. Paras Dhaulta, Advocate, for the petitioners, in
CMPMO No.468 of 2023.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondents/State.
Mr. Maan Singh, Advocate, for respondents No.2(a) and
2(b), in CMPMO No.468 of 2023 and for the petitioner in
CMPMO No.555 of 2023.
Mr. Lovneesh Singh Thakur, Advocate, for respondents
No.3 to 8 and 10 in CMPMO No.468 of 2023 and for
respondents No.2 to 7, 9 & 11 in CMPMO No.555 of 2023.
Mr. Y.P. Sood, Advocate, for respondent No.9 in CMPMO
No.468 of 2023 and for respondent No.10 in CMPMO
No.555 of 2023.
Mr. Mukul Sood, Advocate, for respondent No.11 in
CMPMO No.468 of 2023 and for respondent No.12 in
CMPMO No.555 of 2023.
Mr. Bhupinder Singh Kanwar, Advocate, for respondent
No.12 in CMPMO No.468 of 2023 and for respondent
No.13 in CMPMO No.555 of 2023.
Mr. Sumit Sood, Advocate, for respondent No.13 in
CMPMO No.468 of 2023 and for respondent No.14 in
CMPMO No.555 of 2023.
Mr. H.S. Rangra, Advocate, for respondents No.14(a) to
14(c) in CMPMO No.468 of 2023 and for respondents
No.15(a) to 15(c) in CMPMO No.555 of 2023.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners in
CMPMO No.468 of 2023 seeks an adjournment. Prayer not
opposed. As prayed, list for consideration after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 24, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Anil Kumar and another vs. Nain Singh
RSA No.211 of 2023
.
24.03.2025 Present: Mr. Sanjeev Kuthiala, Senior Advocate with Mr. Druv
Kuthiala, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. G.R. Palsra, Advocate, for the respondent.
RSA No.211 of 2023
Admitted on the substantial questions of law No.2, 4 and
5 formulated at Page-13 and 14 of the paper book.
List for hearing in due course.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 24, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Abdul Majeed vs. The Eicher Tractors Ltd. and another
RSA No.77 of 2023
.
24.03.2025 Present: Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Atharv Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Rajesh Mandhotra, Advocate, for resplendent No.2.
Power of attorney stands filed on behalf of respondent
No.1 by Mr. Atharv Sharma, Advocate.
Record stands received.
Learned counsel for the parties intend to go through the
same.
List for consideration after six weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 24, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Amit Handa vs. The Jullundur Krishna Dal Sewa Samiti
RSA No.272 of 2022
.
24.03.2025 Present: Mr. Atharv Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Divya Raj Singh, Advocate, for the respondent.
Further time payed by the parties to inspect the record. As
jointly prayed, list after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 24, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Nirmala Tanwar and others vs. Jiwan Malik and
another
CMPMO No.108 of 2022
.
24.03.2025 Present: Mr. Somesh Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Naresh Sharma,
Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Vipin Pandit, Advocate, for the respondents.
Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of the
petitioners submits that learned Senior Counsel, who is to argue
the case is not available today on account of ill health. He seeks
an adjournment. Prayer not opposed.
As prayed, list on 21.04.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 24, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Dinesh Kumar vs. Milkhi Ram and another
RSA Nos.113 of and 114 of 2021
.
24.03.2025 Present: Mr. Ankit Dhiman, Advocate, vice Mr. Tarun K. Sharma,
Advocate, for the appellant(s).
Mr. Rajinder Singh Thakur, Advocate, for the
respondent(s), in both the appeals.
Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant
submits that the original counsel is unavailable today on account
of personal difficulty.
r He seeks an adjournment. Prayer not
opposed.
As prayed, list after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 24, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Purshotam Chand and others vs. Jagat Ram and Ors.
RSA No.7 of 2020
.
24.03.2025 Present: Mr. Vishwas Kaushal, Advocate, vice Mr. Vivek Negi,
Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Sumit Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. B.C. Verma,
Advocate, for respondents No.1, 3(b), 4(a), 4(c), 4(d), 5,
10(a) to 10(d) and 11(a).
Mr. Neel Kamal Sharma, Advocate, for respondent
No.2(a).
CMP No.4535 of 2025
Reply, as prayed, be filed within four weeks. List
thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 24, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Nasib Kumar vs. Dev Dutt Sharma
CMPMO No.377 of 2019
.
24.03.2025 Present: Mr. Anirudh Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Sanjeev Kuthiala, Senior Advocate with Ms. Amita
Chandel, Advocate, for the proposed LRs. No.1(a) to 1(e)
of sole respondent, who is stated to have expired.
CMP(M) No.1036 of 2024
Pleadings in the case at hand are complete. For an
effectual and complete adjudication of the matter, delay for bringing
on record the legal representatives of deceased sole respondent, is
condoned. Abatement, if any, is set aside. The application stands
disposed of.
CMP(M) No.1035 of 2024
From perusal of the present application, it is evident that
the sole respondent-Dev Dutt has expired. No reply is intended to
be filed on behalf of the non-applicant. The non-applicant has no
objection, if in case, the application is allowed and the legal heirs of
deceased sole respondent -Dev Dutt, are brought on record as is
being sought in the present application.
Heard counsel for the parties. Sole respondent -Dev Dutt is
stated to have expired on 23.06.2023. The same is evident from the
Death Certificate appended along with the present application as
Annexure A-1. The details of the legal heirs of deceased
Respondent -Dev Dutt are given in Paragraph-1 of the application,
based on Pariwar Register, copy whereof has been appended
along-with present application. However, in response to the present
application, learned counsel for the legal heirs of deceased
respondent submits that there is one more legal representative of
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
deceased respondent, i.e., Smt. Sangeeta, daughter of deceased
.
respondent. In view thereof, it is evident that the right to sue
inheres/survives with the legal heirs of deceased respondent -Dev
Dutt, details whereof, have been given in Paragraph-1 of the
present application and Smt. Sangeeta, details whereof, have
been given in preliminary submission No.3 of the reply filed to the
present application, therefore, they are ordered to be brought on
record. The application stands disposed of. Amended memo of
parties be filed within four weeks.
CMPMO No.377 of 2019
List on 05.05.2025. In the meanwhile, power of attorney on
behalf of newly added respondents No.1(a) to (e) be filed.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 24, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Asa Nand & sons vs. Arvind Kumar Sood a/w
connected matters
Civil Revision No.52 of 2018 a/w
.
Civil Revision Nos.63, 120 and 137 of 2018
24.03.2025 Present: Mr. Bimal Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Aman Thakur,
Advocate, for the petitioners, in CR Nos.52 and 63 of 2018
and for the respondents in CR Nos.120 sad 137 of 2018.
Mr. Vipin Pandit, Advocate, for the respondent in CR
Nos.52 and 63 of 2018 and for the petitioner in CR
Nos.120 and 137 of 2018.
At the request of learned counsel for the parties, list on
30.04.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 24, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:39 :::CIS
Sanjeev Kumar Sharma and another vs. Suman
Sharma and others
Civil Revision No.10 of 2020
.
24.03.2025 Present: Mr. G.C. Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Deepak Gupta,
Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Sumit Sood, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 3.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he has
moved an application for bringing on record the subsequent
developments with respect to the suit property.
r However, the
same is not on record.
Registry to trace the application and place it on record well
before the next date of hearing, post removal of objection(s), if
any.
List on 27.03.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 24, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
General Manager, Northern Railway vs. Balbir Singh
(deceased) through LRs. And another a/w connected
matters.
.
RFA No.61 of 2021 a/w RFA Nos.60 & 62 of 2022
RFA No.61 of 2021 a/w RFA No.60 of 2022
22.03.2025 Present: Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Senior Panel Counsel, for the
appellant, in both the appeals.
Mr. Atharv Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.1(a) to
1(d), in both the appeals.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.2/State, in both the appeals.
RFA No.62 of 2022
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
appellants/State.
Mr. R.K. Sharma, Senior Advocate with Ms. Anita Devi,
Advocate, for respondents No.1(a) to 1(c) though
proceeded against ex parte vide order dated 03.08.2022.
CMP No.4991 of 2024 in RFA No.61 of 2021
Heard counsel for the parties, perused the pleadings.
From perusal of the award dated 05.03.2018, which is a
subject matter of challenge, in the case at hand reflects that 28
Reference Petitions under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act,
were disposed of vide a common judgment. Out of 28 Reference
Petitions, two petitions at Sr. Nos.1 and 2 bore the following
numbers:-
“(a) LAC Petition RBT No.78/16/2013 and
(b) LAC Petition RBT No.52/16/2013″
Insofar as (a) LAC Petition RBT No.78/16/2013 is
concerned, there was only one petitioner in the said petition,
namely Balbir Singh, whereas in the second petition, i.e., LAC
Petition RBT No.52/16/2013, there were two petitioners, namely
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Balbir Singh and Yudhbir Singh. Admittedly, in the case at hand,
.
inadvertently the name of Yudhbir Singh has not been depicted in
the cause title, i.e., name of Yudhbir Singh seems to have been
missed out.
The appeal arising out of the aforesaid Reference Petition
is pending adjudication before this Court. In view thereof, let the
records pertaining to LAC Petition RBT No.52/16/2013 be sent
back to the Reference Court for carrying out necessary
rectification(s) in the cause title.
Post carrying out necessary rectification(s) in the cause
title, the records be sent back to this Court.
Let the needful be done forthwith.
CMP No.2967 of 2024 in RFA No.60 of 2022
Heard counsel for the parties, perused the pleadings.
From perusal of the award dated 05.03.2018, which is a
subject matter of challenge, in the case at hand reflects that 28
Reference Petitions under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act,
were disposed of vide a common judgment. Out of 28 Reference
Petitions, two petitions at Sr. Nos.1 and 2 bore the following
numbers:-
“(a) LAC Petition RBT No.78/16/2013 and
(b) LAC Petition RBT No.52/16/2013″
Insofar as (a) LAC Petition RBT No.78/16/2013 is
concerned, there was only one petitioner in the said petition,
namely Balbir Singh, whereas in the second petition, i.e., LAC
Petition RBT No.52/16/2013, there were two petitioners, namely
Balbir Singh and Yudhbir Singh. Admittedly, in the case at hand,
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
inadvertently the name of Yudhbir Singh has not been depicted in
.
the cause title, i.e., name of Yudhbir Singh seems to have been
missed out.
The appeal arising out of the aforesaid Reference Petition
is pending adjudication before this Court. In view thereof, let the
records pertaining to LAC Petition RBT No.52/16/2013 be sent
back to the Reference Court for carrying out necessary
rectification(s) in the cause title.
Post carrying out necessary rectification(s) in the cause
title, the records be sent back to this Court.
Let the needful be done forthwith.
CMP No.2968 of 2025 in RFA No.60 of 2022
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is
allowed. The applicant is exempted from filing the translated
copies of the documents in question.
The application stands disposed of.
RFA No.62 of 2022
Amended memo of parties be filed on or before the next
date of hearing. List after twelve weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 22, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Jai Ram and another vs. Parwati Devi
RSA No.15 of 2022
.
22.03.2025 Present: Mr. Vivek Negi, Advocate, for the appellants/ applicants.
Mr. Surender Verma, Advocate, for the respondent/ non-
applicant.
RSA No.15 of 2022
Certified copy of the trial Court judgment be filed within
CMP No.1006 of 2022
r to
four weeks. List thereafter.
The present application is dismissed being misconceived
as the same has been filed under two provisions, i.e., Order 41
Rule 5 read with Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 and Section 151 of the
Civil Procedure Code.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 22, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Rajindra Kumari and others vs. Raja Virbhadra Singh
(deceased) through LRs. and another
Civil Suit No.134 of 2021
.
22.03.2025 Present: Mr. Sumit Raj Sharma, Advocate, for plaintiffs No.2 and 3.
Plaintiffs No.1 and 4 are stated to have expired.
Mr. G.D. Verma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Digvijay Singh,
Advocate, for defendant No.1(a).
Mr. Bharat Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. Tejasvi Dogra,
Advocate, for defendants No.1(b), 1(d), 1(e).
Ms. Anu Tuli, Advocate, for defendant No.1(c).
Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Pranjal
Munjal, Advocate, for defendant No.2.
OMP No.956 of 2022
Pleadings be completed on or before the next date of
hearing.
At the joint request of learned counsel for the parties, list
for consideration on 24.04.2025. It is made clear that no further
opportunity shall be granted to the non-applicants to file reply.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 22, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Utter Pradesh Medical Supplies Corporation Limited
vs. M/s Grampus Laboratories
Arbitration Case No.220 of 2022
.
22.03.2025 Present: Mr. Ashok Kumar Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Khem
Raj Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Ravinder Singh Chandel, Advocate, for the
respondent.
In terms of Sections 6 and 10 of the Commercial Courts
Act, 2015, list the matter before the Commercial Division Bench.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 22, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
HPPCL and another vs. Devinder Singh and others a/w
connected matters
RFA Nos.405 & 406 of 2014 and
.
RFA No.65 of 2015
22.03.2025 Present: Mr. Vivek Negi, Advocate, for the non-applicants/
appellants.
Mr. G.D. Verma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Digvijay Singh,
Advocate, for the respondents/claimants.
Learned Senior counsel for the respondents/claimants
seeks time to go through the report of the Registrar (Judicial)
dated 10.12.2024 and if need be to file objections to the same.
Let the needful be done within four weeks. List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 22, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Ashok Kumar vs. Gurcharan Kaur @ Gurbachan
Kaur and others
RSA No.433 of 2014
.
22.03.2025 Present: Mr. Abhishek, Advocate, vice Ms. Rachna Kuthiala,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Harish Kumar, Advocate, vice Mr. Jagat Pal, Advocate,
for respondents No.1 and 2.
Respondent No.3 ex parte.
None for respondent No.4.
At the request of learned counsel for the parties, list after
four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 22, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
General Manager, Northern Railway vs. Rattan
Chand and others a/w connected matter
RFA No.266 of 2014 a/w
.
RFA No.322 of 2015
22.03.2025 Present: Mr. Nand Lal Thakur, Senior Panel Counsel, for the
appellant(s), in both the appeals.
Respondent No.1 is stated to have expired.
Mr. Atharv Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.2 and 3 in
RFA No.266 of 2014 and for respondents No.2, 4 and 5 in RFA
No.322 of 2015.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondents/State, in both the appeals.
CMP(M) No.289 of 2024 in RFA No.266/2014
For an effectual and complete adjudication of the matter,
delay for bringing on record the legal representatives of deceased
respondent No.1, is condoned. Abatement, if any, is set aside. The
application stands disposed of.
CMP(M) No.288 of 2024 in RFA No.266/2014
From perusal of the present applications, it is evident that
respondent No.1-Rattan Chand has expired.
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicants. The non-applicants have no objection, if in case, the
applications are allowed and the legal heirs of deceased respondent
No.1- Rattan Chand, are brought on record as is being sought in the
application (CMP(M) No.288 of 2024).
Heard counsel for the parties. Respondent No.1- Rattan
Chand is stated to have expired on 15.07.2018. The same is
evident from the Death Certificate appended along with the present
application as Annexure A-1. Respondent No.1- Rattan Chand is
survived by his legal heirs, details whereof, have been given in
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Paragraph-1 of the application (CMP(M) No.288 of 2024). From
.
perusal of the legal heir certificate, it is evident that deceased
respondent No.1- Rattan Chand is survived by two legal heirs,
namely Varinder Kumar Sharma and Rajinder Kumar. Both the said
legal heirs are already on record as respondents No.2 and 3. In
view thereof, present applications are disposed of. The name of
deceased respondent No.1- Rattan Chand is ordered to be deleted
from the array of the parties, as his legal heirs are already on record
as respondents No.2 and 3. Amended memo of parties be filed
within four weeks. The applications stand disposed of.
RFA No.322 of 2015
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants
submits that objections in the application filed for bringing on
record the legal heirs of deceased respondent No.1-Sukhdev Raj
shall be removed during the course of the week. List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 22, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Gian Chand vs. Onkar Singh a/w connected matter
RSA No.554 of 2012 and
RSA No.555 of 2012
.
22.03.2025 Present: None for the appellant(s).
Mr. Abhishek, Advocate, vice Ms. Rachna Kuthiala,
Advocate, for the respondent(s).
RSA No.554 of 2012 & RSA No.555 of 2012
From perusal of order-sheet dated 29.08.2024, it is evident
that the sole appellant, in the case at hand, has expired. Till date,
no steps for bringing on record the legal heirs of deceased sole
appellant have been taken.
The appeal, in the case at hand, has abated as the legal
heirs of deceased appellant have not been brought on record
within the prescribed period of limitation. Ordered accordingly.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 22, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Krishan Chand and others vs. Roop Lal (deceased)
through LRs.
RSA No.537 of 2011
.
22.03.2025 Present: Mr. Vivek Sharma, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Neel Kamal Sharma, Advocate, for the respondents.
Fresh Power of attorney on behalf of appellant No.3, if not
already filed, be filed on or before the next date of hearing.
List after four weeks.
r ( Bipin C. Negi )
March 22, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
State of H.P. and others vs. Ganga Ram (deceased)
through LRs.
RFA No.341 of 2009
.
22.03.2025 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
appellants/State.
Ms. Veena Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.1(a) to
1(c), 2(a) and 3/applicants.
Mr. Anirudh Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.1(d)
and 2(b).
CMP No.26210 of 2024
Heard learned counsel for the parties, perused the
pleadings.
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is
allowed. 20% of the amount lying deposited in the Registry of this
Court along-with proportionate interest accrued thereupon is
ordered to be released in favour of the applicants in terms of their
share(s), detailed in Paragraph-12 of the application. The
amount be remitted to the bank accounts, details whereof, have
been given in the same paragraph of the application, subject to
proper verifications. The application stands disposed of.
It is made clear that the aforesaid release of amount shall
be subject to final outcome of the appeal and in case excess
amount is received by the applicants, they shall be liable to
refund the amount along-with interest.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 22, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Hoshiar Singh vs. Harvinder Singh and others
RSA No.88 of 2023
.
22.03.2025 Present: Mr. Malay Kaushal, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Gurdev Negi, Advocate, for the respondents.
Record stands received.
Learned counsel for the parties intend to go through the
same.
List for consideration after four weeks. Interim order to
continue.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 22, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Ajit Singh vs. Harvinder Singh
Civil Revision No.77 of 2023
.
22.03.2025 Present: Mr. Malay Kaushal, Advocate, vice Mr. Pawanish K.
Shukla, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms. Heena Chauhan, Advocate, for the respondent.
CMP No.14812 of 2024
Learned vice counsel for the petitioner submits that the
r to
original counsel, who is to argue the case is not available today
on account of ill health of his minor daughter.
adjournment. Prayer not opposed.
He seeks an
As prayed, list on 07.04.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 22, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Sushil Kumar vs. Karan Singh @ Karam Singh & Ors.
CMPMO No.666 of 2022
.
22.03.2025 Present: Mr. Parikshit Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Rakesh Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Respondents No.2(a) and 2(b) are ex parte.
At the request of learned counsel appearing on behalf of
the petitioner, list on 21.04.2025.
r ( Bipin C. Negi )
March 22, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Jagmohan vs. Saraswati Vihar Welfare Association
and others
CMPMO No.235 of 2022
.
22.03.2025 Present: Mr. Atharv Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. R.K. Gautam, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sahil Dixit,
Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 4.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.5/State.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner
submits that learned Senior Counsel is not available today. He
seeks an adjournment. Prayer not opposed.
As prayed, list on 23.04.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 22, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Sanjay Kumar vs. Kavita Kashyap and another
Civil Revision No.11 of 2020
.
22.03.2025 Present: Mr. Suneet Goel, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vishvas
Kaushal, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Karan Singh Kanwar, Advocate, for the respondents.
As jointly prayed, list after four weeks.
March 22, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Raghubir Singh vs. Vijay Kumar and others
Civil Revision No.169 of 2017
.
22.03.2025 Present: Mr. Basant Pal Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Rahul Gathania, Advocate, vice Mr. Sanjeev Sood,
Advocate, for respondents No.1 & 2.
Learned counsel for the parties submit that there is no
possibility of amicable settlement between the parties.
Respondent No.4 is stated to have expired.
consequential steps for bringing on record the legal heirs of
deceased respondent No.4 be taken within four weeks.
Let
List
thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 22, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Arvind Kumar vs. Amitesh Shah and others
Civil Revision No.103 of 2024
.
22.03.2025 Present: Mr. Avinash Jaryal, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner
submits that an appropriate application for placing on record the
summons by virtue of which he was served for the first time
before the trial Court, has been filed. There are some objections
in the said application and the same is lying under objection.
Registry to trace the application and place it on record well
before the next date of hearing, post removal of objection(s), if
any.
List on 02.04.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 22, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Dharmender Singh vs. Devi Singh and others
Civil Revision No.126 of 2022
.
22.03.2025 Present: Ms. Anchal Singh, Advocate, vice Mr. Vinod Chauhan,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raju Ram Rahi, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Kulwant Singh Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent
No.4 to 8.
Respondents No.2 & 3 proceeded against ex parte vide
order dated 10.10.2022.
Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner
submits that arguing counsel is unavailable today on account of
ill health. She seeks an adjournment. Prayer not opposed.
As prayed, list on 28.03.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 22, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Vinod Kumar vs. Som Parkash
Civil Revision No.61 of 2019
.
22.03.2025 Present: Mr. Karan Singh Kanwar, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Desh Raj Thakur, Advocate, for the respondent.
As jointly prayed, list on 24.04.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 22, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Nand Lal and another vs. Roop Lal and others a/w
connected matters
RSA Nos.149 to 151 of 2022
.
22.03.2025 Present: Mr. Jagat Pal, Advocate, vice Mr. H.S. Rangra, Advocate,
for the appellants.
Mr. Romesh Verma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Digvijay
Singh, Advocate, for the respondents No.1(a) to 1(c).
Parties are present.
Learned counsel for the parties submit that there is a
possibility of an amicable settlement between the parties and the
matter be referred to the mediation.
On the request of learned counsel for the parties, the
matter is sent for mediation. With the consent of the learned
counsel for the parties, Mr. N.K. Sood, learned Senior Advocate,
is appointed as Mediator in this matter.
Learned counsel for the parties submit that subject to
availability of learned Mediator, they would be appearing before
the Mediator along-with their respective parties today itself in the
Main Mediation Centre, H.P. High Court. The official
Coordinator, High Court Main Mediation Centre shall render all
assistance to learned Mediator.
Registry is directed to make available the complete record
to the learned Mediator.
Learned Mediator is requested to submit his report on or
before the next date of hearing. Put up with the report of learned
Mediator on 26.05.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 22, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Tarsem Singh and others vs. Ramesh Chand and
others
RSA No.706 of 2008 a/w
.
Cross Objection No.67 of 2009
22.03.2025 Present: Mr. Divya Raj Singh, Advocate, for the appellants/non-
cross objector.
Mr. Abhishek, Advocate vice Ms. Rachna Kuthiala,
Advocate, for respondents No. 1, 2, 4(a) to 4(c), 5 to
8/cross-objectors.
None for respondents No. 3(a) and 3(b), 9 to 13 and 15 to
21.
Respondent No. 14 is stated to have expired.
Names of respondents No. 22, 25 to 27 stand deleted.
Further time prayed for bringing on record the legal heirs
of deceased respondent No.14. Let the needful be done within
four weeks.
List after four weeks. In the meanwhile, newly added
respondents No.3(a) and 3(b) may also file their power of
attorney. Amended memo of parties be also filed in the
meanwhile.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 22, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Muni Lal vs. State of HP and others
RSA No.299 of 2008
.
22.03.2025 Present: Mr. Romesh Verma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Digvijay
Singh, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondents/State.
CMP No.10445 of 2024
Heard learned counsel for the parties, perused the
contents of the application and the reply.
In the case at hand, the matter had been referred to
mediation, however, the mediation had failed. Based on the
concessions made at the mediation, present application has
been filed by the applicant/appellant/plaintiff.
It is well settled that when a matter is pending adjudication
before a Court and the parties during the pendency of the
proceedings try to settle the dispute outside the Court, then any
concession so made during such an attempted compromise,
which ultimately did not fructify cannot be used by either of the
parties.
In view thereof, present application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 22, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Aslam Khan vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Cr.MP(M) No.625 of 2025
.
22.03.2025 Present: Mr. Nand Lal Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
Notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate
General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the
respondent-State and seeks time to file status report.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that other bail
matters arising out of the same FIR have been listed for
26.03.2025.
List on 26.03.2025. Status report be filed on or before the
next date of hearing.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 22, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Hiro Devi vs. Laxmi Devi and others
CMP(M) No.33 of 2025
.
22.03.2025 Present: Mr. Vishal Singh Thakur, Advocate, for the applicant/
appellant.
None for the non-applicants.
CMP(M) No.33 of 2025
For the sufficient cause shown in the application, the
same is allowed. Delay of 32 days in filing the present appeal
is condoned. The application stands disposed of.
RSA No.______/2025
Be registered.
List for admission after one week.
CMP No.______/2025
Be registered.
List along-with main appeal.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 22, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Rabinder Kumar vs. M/s Gupta Fruit Company and
others
CMPMO No.526 of 2015
.
22.03.2025 Present: Mr. Dushyant Dadwal, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Mukul Sood, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Ms. Kiran Lata Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.18.
None for respondents No.2 to 17.
r to
As jointly prayed, list on 07.04.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 22, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Pushpa Devi and others vs. Amit Kumar and others
RFA No.8 of 2001 a/w CO No.119 of 2021
.
21.03.2025 Present: Mr. Bhupinder Gupta, Senior Advocate with Ms. Rinki
Kashmiri, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Anuj Gupta, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Anand Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Karan
Sharma, Adocate, for respondent No.2.
Mr. Vinod Gupta, Advocate, for respondent No.3(a).
Mr. Sahil Dixit, Advocate, for respondents No.4(a) to 4(c).
Name of respondent No.3(b) stands deleted.
Heard in part.
List for continuation on 22.03.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 21, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Pushpa Devi and others vs. Amit Kumar and others
RFA No.8 of 2001 a/w CO No.119 of 2021
.
21.03.2025 Present: Mr. Bhupinder Gupta, Senior Advocate with Ms. Rinki
Kashmiri, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Anuj Gupta, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Anand Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Karan
Sharma, Adocate, for respondent No.2.
Mr. Vinod Gupta, Advocate, for respondent No.3(a).
Mr. Sahil Dixit, Advocate, for respondents No.4(a) to 4(c).
Name of respondent No.3(b) stands deleted.
Heard in part.
List for continuation on 22.03.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 21, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Durga Ram and others vs. The Principal Secretary
(Power) and others
.
CMP No.4334 of 2025 in RFA No.1 of 2023
21.03.2025 Present: Ms. Shashi Kiran, Advocate, for the appellants/non-
applicants.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondents No.1 & 3/State.
Mr. Hamender Singh Chandel, Advocate, for respondents
No.2 & 4.
Mr. K.S. Dhaulta, Advocate, for the proforma responents/
applicants.
CMP No.4334 of 2025
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicants. The non-applicants have no objection, if in case, the
application is allowed and the legal heirs of deceased proforma
respondent No.8(a)-Prem Dutt are brought on record as is being
sought in the present application.
Heard counsel for the parties. Proforma respondent No.8(a)-
Prem Dutt is stated to have expired on 02.04.2023 The same is
evident from the Death Certificate appended along with the present
application as Annexure A-1. Deceased proforma respondent
No.8(a)-Prem Dutt is survived by his legal heirs, details whereof,
have been given in Paragraph-2 of the application. The same is in
consonance with the details given in Legal Heirs Certificate
appended along with the present application.
Since the right to sue inheres/survives with the aforesaid
legal heirs of deceased proforma respondent No.8(a)-Prem Dutt
therefore, they are ordered to be brought on record.
The application stands disposed of.
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
CMP No.4336 of 2025
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
.
applicants. The non-applicants have no objection, if in case, the
application is allowed and the legal heirs of deceased proforma
respondent No.10-Ram Devi are brought on record as is being
sought in the present application.
Heard counsel for the parties. Proforma respondent No.10-
Ram Devi is stated to have expired on 03.02.2024 The same is
evident from the Death Certificate appended along with the present
application as Annexure A-2. Deceased proforma respondent
No.10-Ram Devi is survived by her legal heirs, details whereof,
have been given in Paragraph-2 of the application. The same is in
consonance with the details given in Legal Heirs Certificate
appended along with the present application.
Since the right to sue inheres/survives with the aforesaid
legal heirs of deceased proforma respondent No.10-Ram Devi
therefore, they are ordered to be brought on record.
The application stands disposed of.
CMP No.4337 of 2025
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicants. The non-applicants have no objection, if in case, the
application is allowed and the legal heirs of deceased proforma
respondent No.14(a)-Suresh Kumar are brought on record as is
being sought in the present application.
Heard counsel for the parties. Proforma respondent
No.14(a)-Suresh Kumar is stated to have expired on 12.03.2023.
The same is evident from the Death Certificate appended along with
the present application. Deceased proforma respondent No.14(a)-
Suresh Kumar is survived by his legal heirs, details whereof, have
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
been given in Paragraph-2 of the application. The same is in
.
consonance with the details given in Legal Heirs Certificate
appended along with the present application.
Since the right to sue inheres/survives with the aforesaid
legal heirs of deceased proforma respondent No.8(a)-Prem Dutt
therefore, they are ordered to be brought on record.
The application stands disposed of.
CMP No.4338 of 2025
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicants. The non-applicants have no objection, if in case, the
application is allowed and the legal heirs of deceased proforma
respondent No.17-Satya Devi are brought on record as is being
sought in the present application.
Heard counsel for the parties. Proforma respondent No.17-
Satya Devi is stated to have expired on 14.03.2020. The same is
evident from the Death Certificate appended along with the present
application. Deceased proforma respondent No.17-Satya Devi is
survived by her legal heirs, details whereof, have been given in
Paragraph-2 of the application. The same is in consonance with the
details given in Legal Heirs Certificate appended along with the
present application.
Since the right to sue inheres/survives with the aforesaid
legal heirs of deceased proforma respondent No.17-Satya Devi,
therefore, they are ordered to be brought on record.
The application stands disposed of.
CMP No.4339 of 2025
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicants. The non-applicants have no objection, if in case, the
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
application is allowed and the legal heirs of deceased proforma
.
respondent No.19-Revti Devi are brought on record as is being
sought in the present application.
Heard counsel for the parties. Proforma respondent No.17-
Satya Devi is stated to have expired on 11.11.2017. The same is
evident from the Death Certificate appended along with the present
application as Annexure A-5. Deceased proforma respondent
No.19-Revti Devi is survived by her legal heirs, details whereof,
have been given in Paragraph-2 of the application. The same is in
consonance with the details given in Legal Heirs Certificate
appended along with the present application.
Since the right to sue inheres/survives with the aforesaid
legal heirs of deceased proforma respondent No.19-Revti Devi,
therefore, they are ordered to be brought on record.
The application stands disposed of.
CMP No.4340 of 2025
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicants. The non-applicants have no objection, if in case, the
application is allowed and the legal heirs of deceased proforma
respondent No.20-Ram Devi are brought on record as is being
sought in the present application.
Heard counsel for the parties. Proforma respondent No.20-
Ram Devi is stated to have expired on 03.02.2024. The same is
evident from the Death Certificate appended along with the present
application as Annexure A-6. Deceased proforma respondent
No.20-Ram Devi is survived by her legal heir, details whereof, have
been given in Paragraph-2 of the application. The same is in
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
consonance with the details given in Legal Heirs Certificate
.
appended along with the present application.
Since the right to sue inheres/survives with the aforesaid
legal heirs of deceased proforma respondent No.20-Ram Devi,
therefore, they are ordered to be brought on record.
The application stands disposed of.
CMP No.4341 of 2025
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicants. The non-applicants have no objection, if in case, the
application is allowed and the legal heirs of deceased proforma
respondent No.38-Prem Devi are brought on record as is being
sought in the present application.
Heard counsel for the parties. Proforma respondent No.38-
Prem Devi is stated to have expired on 31.03.2019. The same is
evident from the Death Certificate appended along with the present
application as Annexure A-7. Deceased proforma respondent
No.38-Prem Devi is survived by her legal heirs, details whereof,
have been given in Paragraph-2 of the application. The same is in
consonance with the details given in Legal Heirs Certificate
appended along with the present application.
Since the right to sue inheres/survives with the aforesaid
legal heirs of deceased proforma respondent No.38-Prem Devi,
therefore, they are ordered to be brought on record.
The application stands disposed of.
Amended memo of parties placed at Page-707 of the paper
book is taken on record.
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
CMP No.4342 of 2025
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
.
applicants. The non-applicants have no objection if in case the
amount lying deposited in this Registry of this Court along-with
proportionate interest accrued thereupon, is released in favour of
the applicants.
The appeal, in the case at hand, was decided on 02.01.2023.
It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
applicants that no further proceedings against the said decision are
pending before the Hon’ble Apex Court.
Other than the aforesaid, for the reasons stated in the
application, the same is allowed. The amount lying deposited in the
Registry of this Court along-with proportionate interest accrued
thereupon is ordered to be released in favour of the applicants in
terms of their share(s), detailed in Annexure A-9 (colly.) appended
with the application. The amount be remitted to the bank accounts,
details whereof, have been given in Annexure A-8 (colly.) appended
with the present application, subject to proper verification. The
application stands disposed of.
CMP No.4343 of 2025
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is
allowed. The applicants are exempted from filing English translated
copies of the documents in question. The application stands
disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 21, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Naveen Awasthi vs. Surender Singh
CMPMO No.115 of 2015
.
21.03.2025 Present: Mr. Tek Chand, Advocate, vice Mr. H.C. Sharma, Adocate,
for the petitioner.
Mr. Vishal Panwar, Advocate, for the respondent.
Heard in part.
Learned counsel of the respondent has drawn the
attention of this Court to the decision of the Hon’ble Apex Court
in Kanaklata Das and others vs. Naba Kumar Das and others,
2018(2) SCC 352, specifically paragraph-11 and its sub paras.
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks time to go
through the same.
List on 24.03.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 21, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Mohsin Ahmad vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Cr.MP(M) No.618 of 2025
.
21.03.2025 Present: Ms. Divya Rajta, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondent/State.
As prayed by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
petitioner, list on 30.04.2025.
March 21, 2025 (KS)
to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
South East Asian Study Foundation Trust and another
vs. Vocational Education Foundation Trust and
others
.
Arbitration Case No.88 of 2025
21.03.2025 Present: Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ajeet Pal
Singh Jaswal, Advocate, for the petitioners.
In terms of Sections 6 and 10 of the Commercial Courts
Act, 2015, the matter is to be listed before the Commercial
Division Bench.
Other than the aforesaid, keeping in view the urgency in
the matter, let the same be placed before the Hon’ble Chief
Justice today for passing appropriate orders qua its listing before
the appropriate Bench.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 21, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
The Principal Secretary and others vs. Sant Ram and
others
CMP(M) No.315 of 2025
.
21.03.2025 Present: Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the applicants-appellants/State.
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the
respondents, returnable within four weeks.
March 21, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
The State of HP PWD and another vs. M/s Tenzin
Constructions Co. Pvt. Ltd.
Arbitration Case No.80 of 2025
.
21.03.2025 Present: Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the applicants/State.
In terms of Sections 6 and 10 of the Commercial Courts
Act, 2015, list the matter before the Commercial Division Bench.
March 21, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Narpat Singh vs. Bhaskar Dutt and others
RSA No.13 of 2025
.
21.03.2025 Present: Mr. Vipin Bhatia, Advocate, vice Mr. Servedaman Rathore,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Mehar Chand, Advocate, for respondents No.1 and 2.
Respondents No.3 stands served. However, there is no
appearance on her behalf. Hence, she is proceeded against ex
parte.
have expired. Let
As per report of the Registry, respondent No.4 is stated to
consequential steps for bringing
on record the legal heirs of deceased respondent No.4 be
taken by the appellant within four weeks.
List after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 21, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
The CEO-cum-Secretary vs. Gurbakash (deceased)
through LRs. and others
RFA No.89 of 2021
.
21.03.2025 Present: Ms Tamanna Chauhan, Advocate, vice Mr. R.L. Sharma,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Rajesh Kumar Parmar, Advocate, for respondents
No.1(a), 2 to 5.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for
respondents No.6 to 8.
CMP No.6322 of 2024
r to
As jointly prayed, list for consideration after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 21, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Kundan Singh vs. Panch Ram and another
CMPMO No.123 of 2024
.
21.03.2025 Present: Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ajeet Pal
Singh Jaswal, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Respondent No.1 is stated to have expired.
Mr. G.D. Verma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sumit Sharma,
Advocate, for respondent No.2.
CMP No.10008 of 2024
The present application has been filed for deletion of name
of respondent No.1-Panch Ram, as according to the applicant,
one of the legal heirs of said Panch Ram, i.e., Amar Singh, is
already on record.
However, from perusal of the reply filed by the non-
applicant, it is evident that other than Amar Singh, there are other
legal heirs of deceased respondent No.1-Panch Ram, insofar as
the suit land is concerned. By virtue of an alleged Will, there are
other legal heirs of deceased respondent No.1-Panch Ram,
detailed in Paragraph-3 of the reply (Page -161 of the paper
book).
In the aforesaid facts and attending circumstances, on
taking steps during the course of the day, let Dasti notice be
issued to the proposed legal heirs detailed in Paragraph-3 of the
reply (Page -161 of the paper book), i.e., LRs. No.1(a) to 1(e),
returnable for 04.04.2025. Dasti notice be handed over to
learned counsel for the applicant latest by 24.03.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 21, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Yugal Kishore vs. Jiwan Lal
CMP(M) No.2133 of 2024
.
21.03.2025 Present: Mr. Pranjal Munjal, Advocate, vice Mr. Ajeet Pal Singh
Jaswal, Advocate, for the applicant-appellant.
Mr. Parav Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent.
Reply is stated to have been filed on behalf of the non-
applicant. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that he has
record.
r to
received the copy of the same. However, the same is not on
Registry to trace the reply and place it on record well
before the next date of hearing, post removal of objection(s), if
any.
Rejoinder, if any, be filed on or before the next date of
hearing. List after three weeks.
Henceforth, name of Mr. Parav Sharma, learned Advocate
be reflected in the cause list as counsel for the respondent.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 21, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Nain Parkash vs. Guddi Devi
CMPMO No.642 of 2024
.
21.03.2025 Present: Mr. Ashish Verma, Advocate, vice Mr. B.S. Attri, Advocate,
for the petitioner.
Mr, Manoj, Advocate, vice Ms. Madhurika Sekhon,
Advocate, for the respondent.
Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner
submits that the arguing counsel is unavailable today on account
of bereavement in his family. He seeks an adjournment. Prayer
not opposed.
As prayed, list the matter after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 21, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Vikas Kumar Mahajan vs. Dev Raj and others
CMPMO No.459 of 2024
.
21.03.2025 Present: Mr. Naresh K. Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Mohit Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Vishal Bindra,
Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondents No.2/State.
CMP No.12831 of 2025
Since the arrears of wages stand deposited, therefore,
interim order dated 01.08.2024 is made absolute. The application
stands disposed of.
CMPMO No.459 of 2024
As jointly prayed, list for consideration on 04.04.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 21, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Land Acquisition Collector vs. Sushma Kumari and
others
CMP(M) No.370 of 2024
.
21.03.2025 Present: Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
applicants-appellants/State.
Mr. Karanveer Singh, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 3
and 5.
CMP(M) No.334 of 2025
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicants. The non-applicants have no objection, if in case, the
application is allowed and the legal heirs of deceased respondent
No.4- Jagdamba Prasad, are brought on record as is being sought in
the present application.
Heard counsel for the parties. Respondent No.4- Jagdamba
Prasad is stated to have expired on 16.04.2014. The same is
evident from the Death Certificate appended along with the present
application as Annexure R-1. Respondent No.4- Jagdamba Prasad
is survived by his legal heirs, details whereof, have been given in
Paragraph-3 of the application. The same is in consonance with the
details of the legal heirs provided by the concerned Revenue
Officials vide Annexure R-II appended along with the present
application.
Since the legal heirs of deceased respondent No.4-
Jagdamba Prasad are already on record as respondents No.1 to 3,
therefore, present application is allowed. Name of respondent No.4-
Jagdamba Prasad is ordered to be deleted, subject to just all
exceptions. Amended memo of parties be filed within four weeks.
The application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 21, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Gian Chand and others vs. Sita Ram and others
RSA No.284 of 2024
.
21.03.2025 Present: Mr. Naresh Verma, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Ajay Chandel, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
At the joint request of learned counsel for the parties, list
after ten days.
March 21, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Rekha Karol and others vs. Lachhmi Devi and others
RSA No.272 of 2012
.
20.03.2025 Present: Ms. Meera Devi vice Mr. Deepak Gupta, Advocate, for the
appellants.
Mr. Bhupinder Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Janesh
Gupta, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Names of respondents No.2, 11 and 12 stand deleted.
Mr. N.K. Thakur, Senior Advocate with Mr. Divya Raj
Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.10.
None for remaining respondents.
At the joint request of learned counsel for the parties, list
on 06.05.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 20, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Munshi Ram and others vs. Hukmi and another
RSA No.202 of 2007
.
20.03.2025 Present: Mr. Y.P. Sood, Advocate, for the appellants, except
appellants No.17(b), who is stated to have expired.
Mr. Subhash Chander, Advocate, vice Mr. Dushyant
Dadwal, Advocate, for the respondents.
CMP(M) No.1316 of 2024
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicants. The non-applicants have no objection, if in case,
the application is allowed and the legal heirs of deceased
appellant No.17(b) are brought on record as is being sought in
the present application.
Appellant No.17(b) is stated to have expired on
16.05.2024. The same is evident from the Death Certificate
appended along with the present application as Annexure A-1.
Appellant No.17(b) is survived by his legal heirs, details
whereof, have been given in Paragraph-3 of the application.
Since the right to sue inheres/survives with the aforesaid
legal heirs of deceased appellant No.17(b), therefore, they are
ordered to be brought on record.
The application stands disposed of. Amended memo of
parties be filed within two weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 20, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Supna Devi vs. Yog Raj and others a/w connected
matters
RSA No.112 of 2022 and
.
RSA No.165 of 2023
RSA No.112 of 2022
20.03.2025 Present: Mr. Sudhir Thakur, Senior Advocate with Mr. Somesh
Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Ms. Mamta Bhatwan, Advocate, vice Mr. Aditya Thakur,
Advocate, for respondent No.1(a) & 1(b).
None for respondents No.2 to 6.
Respondent No.1 is stated to be expired.
RSA No.165 of 2023
Ms. Mamta Bhatwan, Advocate, vice Mr. Aditya Thakur,
Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Sudhir Thakur, Senior Advocate with Mr. Somesh
Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
None for respondents No.2 to 6.
Amended memo of parties be filed within two weeks.
Power of attorney on behalf of respondents No.1(a) & 1(b), be
also filed within four weeks. List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 20, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Prakash Chand vs. Jeet Ram and others
RSA No.1 of 2022
.
20.03.2025 Present: Mr. Virender Singh Kanwar, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. A.K. Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
None for respondents No.2 to 8.
Learned counsel for the parties intend to have instructions,
as to whether the matter inter se parties can be settled amicably.
List after two weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 20, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Rajeev Sharma vs. Ram Devi and others
Civil Revision No.13 of 2021
.
20.03.2025 Present: Mr. Ashish Verma, Advocate, vice Mr. B.S. Attri, Advocate,
for the petitioner.
None for respondents No.1, 2(a) to 2(c), 4 & 5.
Respondent No.3 proceeded against ex parte vide order
dated 12.08.2021.
Ms. Tanu Sharma, Advocate, as Court Guardian, for
respondents No.6 & 7.
Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner
submits that the arguing counsel is unavailable today on account
of bereavement in his family. He seeks an adjournment.
As prayed, list the matter after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 20, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Municipal Corporation Shimla vs. M/s Akar Enterprises
Civil Revision No.80 of 2020
.
20.03.2025 Present: Mr. Mukul Sood, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Balwant Kukreja, Advocate, for the respondent.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that an
application for placing on record additional documents has been
filed. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that he has
received a copy of the same.
r However, the same is not on
record.
Registry to trace the application and place it on record well
before the next date of hearing, post removal of objection(s), if
any.
List on 26.03.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 20, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Suresh Kumar & others vs. Santosh and others
Civil Revision No.206 of 2022
.
20.03.2025 Present: Mr. P.S. Goverdhan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rakesh
Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Pranshul Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
None for respondent No.2.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondents No.3 & 4/State.
Heard in part.
r to
At the request of learned counsel for
respondent No.1, list for continuation on 26.03.2025 in order to
enable him to prepare the case.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 20, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Vidya Sagar and another vs. Mahant Ram
CMPMO No.131 of 2022
.
20.03.2025 Present: Ms. Tara Devi, Advocate, vice Mr. P.P. Chauhan,
Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Hamender Singh Chandel, Advocate, for the
respondent.
At the request of learned vice counsel appearing on behalf
of the petitioner, list on 21.04.2025.
r ( Bipin C. Negi )
March 20, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Vidya Sagar vs. Brij Lal and others
CMPMO No.323 of 2021
.
20.03.2025 Present: Mr. Janesh Mahajan, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Vijay Kumar Bhatia, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to
3.
No notice issued to respondent No.4.
Records of the Trial Court be called for.
List on 10.04.2025.
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
March 20, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Noor Bibi @ Fazal Bibi vs. Union of India and others
CMPMO No.1114 of 2019
.
20.03.2025 Present: Mr. Dheeraj K. Vashisht, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Rajinder Thakur, Central Government Counsel, for
respondent No.1/Union of India.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.2/State.
At the request of learned counsel for the respondent, list
for consideration on 25.03.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 20, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Shakuntala (deceased) through LR and another vs.
Inder Singh
CMPMO No.809 of 2019
.
20.03.2025 Present: Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Anil Kapoor, Advocate, vice Mr. Nimish Gupta,
Advocate, for the respondent.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner
seeks time to file fresh power of attorney as the original counsel
has now been designated as Senior Advocate.
r Prayer not
opposed.
Let the needful be done on or before the next date of
hearing. List on 07.04.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 20, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
The Land Acquisition Collector, HPPWD and another
vs. Narpal Singh and others
RFA No.28 of 2022
.
20.03.2025 Present: Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the appellants/State.
Ms. Uma Manta, Advocate, for the respondents No.1 to 5/
applicants.
None for LRs. No.6(a), 6(b) & 6(c).
CMP No.586 of 2025
Heard counsel for the parties.
The present application has been filed on behalf of
respondents No.1 to 5 for release of compensation amount lying
deposited before the Court below along with upto date interest
accrued thereupon. For the reasons stated in the application, the
same is allowed and Reference Court is directed to release the
50% of the awarded amount along with proportionate interest
accrued thereupon, subject to proper verification of their
identities. The same be remitted in terms of share delineated in
the land reference decided by the Reference Court on
18.01.2020. The amount along with proportionate interest be
remitted in their bank accounts, details whereof have been given
in Para-6 of the application. While disbursing 50% of the amount
awarded in favour of the applicants’ previous amount, if any,
released in favour of the applicants be taken into account while
determining the same. Application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 20, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Damber Bohra vs. State of H.P.
Cr.MP(M) No.3011 of 2024
.
20.03.2025 Present: Mr. C.D. Negi, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondent/State.
At the request of learned counsel appearing on behalf of
the petitioner, list for consideration on 09.04.2025.
March 20, 2025 (KS)
to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
State of Himachal Pradesh and another vs. Madan Lal
and others
CMP(M) No.443 of 2023
.
19.03.2025 Present: Ms. Sunaina, Deputy Advocate General, for the applicants-
appellants/State.
Mr. Kuldeep Chandel, Proxy Counsel, for respondents
No.1 to 3, 4(b), 4(c), 5 & 6.
CMP(M) Nos.454 and 455 of 2025
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicants. The non-applicants have no objection, if in case,
the applications are allowed and the legal heirs of deceased
respondent No.4 are brought on record as is being sought in
the application (CMP(M) No.454 of 2025).
Respondent No.4 is stated to have expired on
04.03.2017. The same is evident from the Death Certificate
appended along with the application (CMP(M) No.454 of 2025)
as Annexure A-1. Respondent No.4 is survived by his legal
heirs, details whereof, have been given in Paragraph-4 of the
application (CMP(M) No.454 of 2025). The same is in
consonance with the details of the legal heirs given in Legal
Heirs Certificate appended along with the application (CMP(M)
No.455 of 2025).
Insofar as legal heirs of deceased respondent No.4 are
concerned, learned counsel has put in appearance on behalf of
respondents No.4(b) and 4(c), i.e., Sunil Kumar and Rajan,
sons of the deceased respectively.
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
The wife of deceased respondent No.4, i.e., Smt. Urmila
.
Devi, who has been sought to be brought on record as
respondent No.4(a), is also stated to have expired.
Since the right to sue inheres/survives with the aforesaid
legal heirs of deceased respondent No.4 (respondents No.4(b)
and 4(c), i.e., Sunil Kumar and Rajan), therefore, they are
ordered to be brought on record.
For the bona fide reasons stated/sufficient cause shown
in the application (CMP(M) No.455 of 2025), delay in bringing
on record the legal heirs of deceased respondent No.4, is
condoned and abatement, if any, is set aside.
Consequential steps for bringing on record the legal
heirs of proposed respondent No.4(a), i.e., deceased-Urmila
Devi, wife of deceased respondent No.4, be taken within four
weeks.
The applications stand disposed of. Amended memo of
parties be filed on or before the next date of hearing.
CMP(M) No.443 of 2023
In the filing of the present appeal, there is a delay of
about 1 year and 13 days. The same has been duly explained
in the application filed for condonation of delay. Even
otherwise, while dealing with an application for condonation of
delay filed by the State, one has to be conscious of the
bureaucratic delays, impersonal nature of the governmental
functioning, institutional interest and hence a justice oriented
liberal approach has to be taken while dealing with such
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
applications.
.
In this respect, it would be appropriate to refer to
decision of the Hon’ble Apex Court passed in State of
Manipur and others vs. Koting Lamkang, 2019 (10) SCC
408. The relevant extract of the same is being reproduced
herein below:-
“7. But while concluding as above, it was necessary for
the Court to also be conscious of the bureaucratic delay
and the slow pace in reaching a government decision andthe routine way of deciding whether the State should
prefer an appeal against a judgment adverse to it. Even
while observing that the law of limitation would harshly
affect the party, the Court felt that the delay in the appeal
filed by the State, should not be condoned. against ajudgment adverse to it. Even while observing that the law
of limitation would harshly affect the party, the Court felt
that the delay in the appeal filed by the State, should notbe condoned.
8. Regard should be had in similar such circumstances to
the impersonal nature of the Government’s functioning
where individual officers may fail to act responsibly. This
in turn, would result in injustice to the institutional interestof the State. If the appeal filed by State are lost for
individual default, those who are at fault, will not usually
be individually affected”
Other than the aforesaid, it would also be appropriate to
refer to judgment dated 09.10.2023, passed in Civil Appeal
No.5867 of 2015 titled Sheo Raj Singh (deceased) through
LRs. and others vs. Union of India and another. The relevant
extract of the same is being reproduced herein below:-.
“37. Having bestowed serious consideration to the rival
contentions, we feel that the High Court’s decision to
condone the delay on account of the first respondent’s
inability to present the appeal within time, for the reasons::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
assigned therein, does not suffer from any error
warranting interference. As the aforementioned.
judgments have shown, such an exercise of discretion
does, at times, call for a liberal and justice- oriented
approach by the Courts, where certain leeway could be
provided to the State. The hidden forces that are at workin preventing an appeal by the State being presented
within the prescribed period of limitation so as not to allow
a higher court to pronounce upon the legality and validity
of an order of a lower court and thereby secure unholygains, can hardly be ignored. Impediments in the working
of the grand scheme of governmental functions have to
be removed by taking a pragmatic view on balancing ofthe competing interests.”
Hence, for the reasons/sufficient cause stated in the
application & the aforesaid position of law, delay in filing the
present appeal is condoned. Application stands disposed of.
RFA No.______/2025 (Be registered)
Admit.
Records be called for.
List for hearing in due course.
CMP No._____of 2025
During the pendency of the present appeal, operation
and execution of judgment/award dated 10.02.2022, passed by
learned Additional District Judge, Hamirpur, H.P., in Land
Reference Petition No.3 of 2019, shall remain stayed, subject
to depositing of the awarded amount along-with up-to-date
interest.
The application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 19, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Jaya Nand Sharma vs. Basant Lal Rajta
CMP(M) No.1132 of 2024
.
19.03.2025 Present: Ms. Shivangi Sharma, Proxy Counsel, for the applicant/
appellant.
CMP(M) No.1132 of 2024
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the
respondent, returnable within four weeks.
CMP No.13093 of 2024
Allowed and the applicant is exempted from filing English
translated copies of the documents, in question, annexed with the
accompanying plaint, at this stage, subject to filing of the same
within seven days, as and when directed to do so.
The application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 19, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
The State of HP PWD and another vs. D.C. Chandel
Arbitration Case No.865 of 2024
.
19.03.2025 Present: Ms. Sunaina, Deputy Advocate General, for the
petitioners/State.
Mr. Kuldeep Chandel, Proxy Counsel, for the defendants.
Further two weeks’ time is prayed for depositing the
awarded amount along-with up-to-date interest. Time, as prayed,
is allowed.
Let the amount be deposited within two weeks from today.
It is made clear that execution of award under challenge shall
remain stayed subject to depositing of the entire awarded amount
along-with up-to-date interest accrued thereupon. If the same is
not deposited within two weeks, then the respondents shall be
free to file an appropriate execution petition.
List after two weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 19, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
State of HP and others vs. Vikas Sharma
Arbitration Case No.505 of 2024
.
19.03.2025 Present: Ms. Sunaina, Deputy Advocate General, for the
petitioners/State.
Further two weeks’ time is prayed for depositing the
awarded amount along-with up-to-date interest. Time, as prayed,
is allowed.
Let the amount be deposited within two weeks from today.
It is made clear that execution of award under challenge shall
remain stayed subject to depositing of the awarded amount
along-with up-to-date interest. If the same is not deposited within
two weeks, then the respondents shall be free to file an
appropriate execution petition.
List after two weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 19, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Ashok Kumar Sharma vs. Asha & another
Civil Suit No.7 of 2024
.
19.03.2025 Present: Ms. Shivangi Sharma, Proxy Counsel, for the plaintiff.
Mr. Kuldeep Chandel, Proxy Counsel, for the defendants.
OMP Nos.106 and 107 of 2025
For the reasons stated in the applications, the same are
allowed. The delay in filing, re-filing the written statement is
OMP No.108 of 2025
r to
condoned. The applications stand disposed of.
Allowed and the applicant is exempted from filing
translated copies of the documents, in question, annexed with the
accompanying plaint, at this stage, subject to filing of the same
within seven days, as and when directed to do so.
The application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 19, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
N.S.L. Masli Power Generation Power Limited vs.
Bhagat Singh (deceased) through LRs. and others
CMP(M) No.1606 of 2023
.
19.03.2025 Present: Ms. Shivangi Sharma, Proxy Counsel, for the applicants/
appellants.
Mr. Kuldeep Chandel, Proxy Counsel, for respondents
No.3(a) to 3(d).
Ms. Sunaina, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents
No.4 and 5/State.
Respondents No.1(a) to 1(e), 2 and 6(a) to 6(e) already ex
parte.
Further time prayed on behalf of respondents No.4 and 5
to file reply. Let the needful be done within six weeks. List
thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 19, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Director, National Institute of Technology and another
vs. M/s Himachal Techno Engineer
Arbitration Case No.881 of 2023
.
19.03.2025 Present: Mr. Balram Sharma, Deputy Solicitor General of India with
Mr. Rajiv Sharma, Advocate, for the
petitioners-objectors/Union of India.
Mr. Kuldeep Chandel, Proxy Counsel, for the respondent.
List before the Commercial Division Bench.
March 19, 2025 (KS)
to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Suraj Pal & another vs. Usuf and others
RSA No.268 of 2022
.
19.03.2025 Present: Ms. Shivangi Sharma, Proxy Counsel, for the appellants.
Mr. Kuldeep Chandel, Proxy Counsel, for the respondents.
Since the appeal stands admitted vide order dated
13.09.2022, therefore, list the same for hearing in due course.
In the meanwhile, translated copy of the Jamabandi, as
directed on 10.03.2023 in CMP No.12835 of 2022, be filed.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 19, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Shamsher Masih vs. Menu Parkash
CMPMO No.465 of 2019
.
19.03.2025 Present: Ms. Shivangi Sharma, Proxy Counsel, for the petitioner.
Mr. Kuldeep Chandel, Proxy Counsel, for the respondent.
List for consideration on 03.04.2025.
March 19, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Satya Devi & Others vs. Shashi Pal and others
Civil Revision No.33 of 2017
.
19.03.2025 Present: Ms. Shivangi Sharma, Proxy Counsel, for all the
petitioners, except petitioner No.7, who is stated to have
expired.
Mr. Kuldeep Chandel, Proxy Counsel, for respondent No.1
Respondents No.7, 8 and 10 are stated to have expired.
Respondents No.2 to 6, 9, 11, 12 and 15 ex parte.
None for respondents No.13 and 14.
Further time prayed for bringing on record the legal heirs
of deceased petitioner No.7, respondents No.8 and 10. Let the
needful be done within four weeks. List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 19, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Gurmail Singh vs. Ram Nath and others
RSA No.678 of 2012
.
19.03.2025 Present: Ms. Shivangi Sharma, Proxy Counsel, for the appellant.
Mr. Kuldeep Chandel, Proxy Counsel, for respondents
No.1, 3, 6 to 8, 10 and 11.
Respondents No.2, 4 & 9 are stated to have expired.
CMP(M) Nos.1175 & 1176 of 2024
On the persuasive request of learned proxy counsel, by
way of indulgence, one more opportunity of two weeks is afforded
to the appellant/applicant for effecting service upon proposed
respondent No.2(c).
On taking steps within two weeks, let notice be issued to
the proposed respondent No.2(c), returnable within four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 19, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Sita Ram vs. Bal Ram
RSA No.508 of 2011
19.03.2025 Present: Ms. Shivangi Sharma, Proxy Counsel, for the proposed
.
LRs. of deceased appellant.
Mr. Kuldeep Chandel, Proxy Counsel, for the respondent.
CMP(M) Nos.299 and 300 of 2025
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicant. The non-applicant has no objection, if in case, the
applications are allowed and the legal heirs of deceased sole
appellant are brought on record as is being sought in the
application (CMP(M) No.299 of 2025).
The appellant is stated to have expired on 16.04.2023.
The same is evident from the Death Certificate appended along
with the application (CMP(M) No.299 of 2025) as Annexure A-1.
The appellant is survived by his legal heirs, details whereof, have
been given in Paragraph-4 of the application (CMP(M) No.299 of
2025). The same is in consonance with the details of the legal
heirs given in Legal Heirs Certificate appended along with the
application (CMP(M) No.299 of 2025).
Since the right to sue inheres/survives with the aforesaid
legal heirs of deceased sole appellant, therefore, they are
ordered to be brought on record.
For the bona fide reasons stated/sufficient cause shown in
the application (CMP(M) No.300 of 2025), delay in bringing on
record the legal heirs of deceased sole appellant, is condoned
and abatement, if any, is set aside.
The applications stand disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 19, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Jagan Nath vs. Sanatan Dharam Sabha Kullu
RSA No.378 of 2010
.
19.03.2025 Present: Ms. Shivangi Sharma, Proxy Counsel, for the appellant.
Mr. Kuldeep Chandel, Proxy Counsel, for the respondent.
CMP No.22733 of 2024
For the reasons stated in the application, early hearing of
RSA No.378 of 2010
r to
the appeal is allowed. The application stands disposed of.
List for hearing in the second week of August, 2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 19, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Dahelu (deceased) through LRs. vs. Bhadaru and
others
.
RSA No.346 of 2009
19.03.2025 Present: Ms. Shivangi Sharma, Proxy Counsel, for appellants
No.1(a), 1(b), 1(d) and 1(e).
Appellant No.1(c) is stated to have expired.
Names of respondents No.2, 3, 4 and 9 stand deleted.
Respondents No.8 is stated to have expired.
Mr. Kuldeep Chandel, Proxy Counsel, for the remaining
respondents.
Further time prayed for filing power of attorney on behalf of
respondents No.5(a) to 5(e). Besides the aforesaid, further time
is prayed for bringing on record the legal heirs of deceased
respondent No.8.
Let the needful be done within four weeks. List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 19, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Naresh vs. Geeta Devi and others
RSA No.276 of 2009
.
19.03.2025 Present: Ms. Shivangi Sharma, Proxy Counsel, for the appellant.
Mr. Kuldeep Chandel, Proxy Counsel, for respondents
No.1 to 3.
None for respondents No.4 to 11.
CMP No.3722 of 2025
For the reasons stated in the application, early hearing of
the appeal is allowed. The application stands disposed of.
RSA No.276 of 2009
List for hearing in the first week of August, 2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 19, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Shiv Giri (deceased) & others vs. Shiv Mandi Sudhar
Sabha and others a/w connected matters.
.
RSA No.39 of 2008 a/w CMPMO No.303 of 2021 and
CMP No.14303 of 2021
RSA No.39 of 2008
19.03.2025 Present: Ms. Shivangi Sharma, Proxy Counsel, for the appellants.
Mr. Kuldeep Chandel, Proxy Counsel, for the
respondent(s).
CMPMO No.303 of 2021
Ms. Shivangi Sharma, Proxy Counsel, for the petitioners.
Mr. Kuldeep Chandel, Proxy Counsel, for the
respondent(s).
CMP No.14303 of 2021
Ms. Shivangi Sharma, Proxy Counsel, for the applicant.
Mr. Kuldeep Chandel, Proxy Counsel, for the
respondent(s).
CMP(M) No.850/2020 & CMP(M) No.183/2021 in
RSA No.39 of 2008
At the joint request of learned proxy counsel appearing on
behalf of the parties, list for consideration after two weeks.
RSA No.39 of 2008
Learned proxy counsel appearing on behalf of the
appellants submits that objections in the application filed under
Order 1 Rule 10 of the Civil Procedure Code shall be removed.
Post removal of the objections, if any, the application be
listed for consideration after four weeks.
CMP(M) No.216 of 2023 in CMPMO No.303 of 2021
Reply, as prayed, be filed on or before the next date of
hearing. List after four weeks.
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
CMP No.3244 of 2023 in CMPMO No.303 of 2021
Allowed and the applicants are exempted from filing
.
translated copies of the documents, in question, annexed with the
accompanying petition, at this stage, subject to filing of the same
within seven days, as and when directed to do so.
The application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 19, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Vijaya Gupta and others vs. Kamal Kumar Gupta and
others
RSA No.45 of 2025
.
19.03.2025 Present: Ms. Shivangi Sharma, Proxy Counsel, for the appellants.
At the request of learned proxy counsel appearing
on behalf of the appellants, list for consideration on 25.03.2025.
March 19, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Ram Kumar vs. Surjeet Kaur and others
CMPMO No.36 of 2025
.
19.03.2025 Present: Ms. Shivangi Sharma, Proxy Counsel, for the petitioner.
At the request of learned proxy counsel appearing
on behalf of the petitioner, list for consideration on 01.04.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 19, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Rajeev Nag vs. H.P. Wakf Board
RFA No.12 of 2025
.
19.03.2025 Present: Ms. Shivangi Sharma, Proxy Counsel, for the appellant.
Mr. Kuldeep Chandel, Proxy Counsel, for the respondent.
RFA No.12 of 2025
Notice. Mr. Kuldeep Chandel, learned proxy counsel, on
instructions from Mr. Ajay Kumar Sharma, learned counsel,
appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondent.
List for consideration after four weeks.
CMP No.3472 of 2025
Learned proxy counsel for the appellant states that she is
under instructions not to press this application, at this stage.
Accordingly, the instant application is dismissed as not pressed.
The application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 19, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Kamla Devi vs. Sheela Devi and others
RSA No.181 of 2024
.
18.03.2025 Present: Mr. H.S. Rangra, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Gurmeet Bhardwaj and Ms. Anuja Mehta, Advocates,
for the respondents.
Record stands received.
Learned counsel for the parties intend to go through the
same.
List for consideration after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 18, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Jagdish Singh vs. Deepak Kumar
RSA No.131 of 2024
.
18.03.2025 Present: Mr. Ashok Kumar Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. G.D. Verma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sumit Sharma,
Advocate, for the respondents.
Record stands received.
Learned counsel for the parties intend to go through the
same.
List for consideration after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 18, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
M/s Jawala Ji Alloys Steel Pvt. Ltd. vs. HPSEBL
RFA No.44 of 2024
.
18.03.2025 Present: Mr. Atharv Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Dhananjay Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent.
Mediation in the case at hand has failed.
Record stands received.
Learned counsel for the parties intend to go through the
same. r
List for consideration after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 18, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
NTPCL vs. Lachhami & Others
Civil Revision No.28 of 2024
.
18.03.2025 Present: Ms. Rinki Kashmiri, Advocate, vice Mr. Ajeet Pal Singh,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Respondents No.1 and 2 proceeded againt ex parte vide
order dated 24.05.2024.
Mr. Ashir Kaith, Advocate, vice Mr. Hamender Singh
Chandel, Advocate, for respndents No.3 to 7, 8(a) to 8(c).
Mr. Manish Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for
respondent No.9/ State.
rAt the joint request of learned counsel for the
parties, list the matter in the second week of May, 2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 18, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Dev Raj vs. Durga Dass and others
RSA No.16 of 2024
.
18.03.2025 Present: Mr. Saurav Rattan, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Sunny Modgil, Advocate, for respondent No.1, through
video conferencing.
None for respondents No.2 and 3.
CMP No.9351 of 2024
Rejoinder is stated to have been filed today in the
Registry. If in order, the same be placed on record.
RSA No.16 of 2024
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the
contending parties, in the case at hand, are the real brothers. He
submits that the matter can be settled amicably through
mediation.
Learned counsel for the respondent submits that he needs
to have instructions in the matter. As prayed, list after two weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 18, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Vinod Kumar vs. State of HP and others
RFA No.7 of 2024
.
18.03.2025 Present: Mr. Sudhir Thakur, Senior Advocate with Mr. Somesh
Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondents/State.
CMP No.2560 of 2024
Learned Additional Advocate General submits that reply to
the application shall be filed during the course of the day.
Rejoinder thereto, if any, be filed within four weeks. List
after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 18, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Mamta Sharma vs. Akshay Sharma
CMPMO No.690 of 2023
.
18.03.2025 Present: Mr. Akshay Katoch, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Ashish Verma, Advocate, for the respondent.
At the request of learned counsel for the petitioner,
in order to enable him to have instructions, in terms of order
dated 04.01.2025, list the matter after four weeks.
r ( Bipin C. Negi )
March 18, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Surender Kumar Garg vs. Sanjiv Kumar Saini and
others
CMPMO No.663 of 2023
.
18.03.2025 Present: Mr. Suneet Goel, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vishvas
Kaushal, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Ashok Kumar Tyagi, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
List along-with CMPMO No.662 of 2023, on
26.03.2025.
r ( Bipin C. Negi )
March 18, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Sukh Ram and others vs. Budhi Ram (deceased)
through LRs.
RSA No.246 of 2023
.
18.03.2025 Present: Mr. Romesh Verma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Digvijay
Singh, Advocate, for the appellants/applicants.
Mr. Yuyutsu Singh Thakur, Advocate, for the respondents.
CMP No.16375 of 2023
Time for filing reply to the present application is
being sought since 22.07.2024. However, till date reply has not
been filed.
By way of indulgence, further time is given to the
respondents to do the needful. It is made clear that if no reply is
filed on or before the next date of hearing, then the right to file the
same shall stand closed without further reference to this Court.
List on 24.04.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 18, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Rup Lal vs. Dillan Devi and others
RSA No.113 of 2023
.
18.03.2025 Present: Ms. Shwetima Dogra, Advocate, vice Mr. Vinod Kumar
Gupta, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. K.D. Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Het Ram Thakur,
Advocate, for the respondents.
At the request of learned vice counsel appearing on
r to
behalf of the appellant, list for consideration after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 18, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Himachal Pradesh Power Corporation Ltd. vs. M/s
Hindustan Construction Company Limited
Arbitration Case No.788 of 2024
.
18.03.2025 Present: Mr. Ajay Kumar Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Chander
Mohan, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Pawan Upadhyaya, Advocate, for the respondents,
through video conferencing.
OMP No.153 of 2025
List on 26.03.2025.
r to
Reply be filed on or before the next date of hearing.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 18, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Jagat Ram (deceased) through LRs. vs. Mohan Singh
and another
CMPMO No.710 of 2024
.
18.03.2025 Present: Petitioner-Rajesh Thakur, present in person.
Ms. Meera Devi, Advocate, vice Mr. Deepak Gupta,
Advocate, for respondent No.1.
List on 02.04.2025 along-with CMPMO No.63 of 2025 as
ordered by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated
12.03.2025, passed in CMPMO No.63 of 2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 18, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
The State of HP and another vs. M/s Garg Sons Estate
Promoters Pvt. Ltd.
Arbitration Case No.652 of 2024
.
18.03.2025 Present: Mr. Manish Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for the
petitioners/State.
Mr. Suneet Goel, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vishvas
Kaushal, Advocate, for the respondent.
OMP No.399 of 2025
Learned counsel
to for the petitioner to
maintainability of the present application before this Court.
List after four weeks.
justify the
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 18, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Swati Verma vs. Gaurav Rana
CMPMO No.525 of 2024
.
18.03.2025 Present: Mr. Mridul Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Time for taking steps for the service of sole respondent is
being taken since 30.09.2024.
Let the needful be done within three days. On taking such
steps, issue notice to the respondent, returnable within four
weeks. It is made clear that if steps are not taken within the
aforesaid period, present petition shall automatically stand
dismissed for non prosecution without further reference to this
Court.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 18, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Richa Sipahiya/Katoch vs. Rahul Katoch
CMPMO No.522 of 2024
.
18.03.2025 Present: Mr. Anuj Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Neeraj Kumar Shashwat, Advocate, for the
respondent.
CMP No.1500 of 2025
In pursuance to order dated 10.01.2025, compliance
affidavit has been filed and placed on record. The explanation
offered therein is accepted.
In view of the aforesaid and the fact that the main matter
has now been fixed for consideration on 24.03.2025, present
application stands disposed of.
CMPMO No.522 of 2024
The grievance of the present petitioner, in the case at
hand, is with respect to the non payment of arrears of
maintenance in terms of judgment dated 09.10.2023, passed by
the Division Bench of this Court, in FAO(FC) No.19 of 2023.
According to learned counsel for the respondent entire arrears in
terms thereof stands paid.
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks time to have
instructions qua receipt of the arrears. List the matter on
24.03.2025.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that if the
petitioner receives the entire amount of arrears, then she shall not
press the the present petition.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 18, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Himanshu Gupta vs. Smt. Nirmla Malhotra and others
CMPMO No.490 of 2024
.
18.03.2025 Present: Mr. Tejasvi Verma, Advocate, vice Mr. N.K. Bhalla,
Advocate, for the petitioner, who is stated to have expired.
Petitioner is stated to have died. Learned vice counsel
seeks time to take steps for bringing on record the legal heirs of
deceased petitioner.
r to
Let the needful be done within four weeks. List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 18, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Shahin vs. Shabina Anjum a/w connected matter
CMPMO No.261 of 2024 a/w
CMPMO Nos.262 & 263 of 2024
.
18.03.2025 Present: Mr. B.N. Misra, Senior Advocate with Ms. Aditi Rana,
Advocate, for the petitioner in CMPMO No.261 of 2024
and for the respondent in CMPMO Nos.262 & 263 of 2024.
Mr. Prashant Sharma and Mr. Hitender Verma, Advocates,
for the petitioner in CMPMO Nos.262 & 263 of 2024 and
for the respondent in CMPMO No.261 of 2024.
r to
Further time prayed on behalf of the parties to file their
respective affidavit(s) of assets and liabilities, as on date. Let the
needful be done within four weeks. Learned counsel for the
petitioner submits that he would be depositing the balance
amount of maintenance arrears in the Registry of this Court
during the course of the day.
List after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 18, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
National Highway Authority of India vs. Ram Chand
and another
OMP(M) No.150 of 2024
.
18.03.2025 Present: Ms. Shreya Chauhan, Advocate, for the applicant-
appellant.
Mr. Yuyutsu Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Respondent No.2 is stated to have expired.
OMP(M) No.29 & 30 of 2025
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the legal
heirs of deceased respondent No.2, returnable within four weeks.
Since son of deceased respondent No.2 is already on record as
respondent No.1, therefore, notice be issued only to her
daughter, i.e., Smt. Kamla Devi, as per details given in
Paragraph-3 of the application (OMP(M) No.29 of 2025).
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 18, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Jagdev Singh (deceased) through LRs. and others vs.
Gian Chandson
CMP(M) No.144 of 2024
.
18.03.2025 Present: Mr. Rohit Chauhan, Advocate, vice Mr. Arun Sehgal,
Advocate, for the applicants-appellants.
Mr. Atharv Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent.
Further time prayed for filing rejoinder. Let the needful be
done within four weeks. List thereafter.
r ( Bipin C. Negi )
March 18, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
National Highway Authority of India vs. Banshi Ram
OMP(M) No.108 of 2024
.
18.03.2025 Present: Ms. Shreya Chauhan, Advocate, for the applicant-
appellant.
The appeal in the case at hand has abated as the legal
heirs of deceased respondent have not been brought on record
within the prescribed period of limitation. Ordered accordingly.
March 18, 2025 (KS)
to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
National Highway Authority of India vs. Banshi Ram
OMP(M) No.108 of 2024
.
18.03.2025 Present: Ms. Shreya Chauhan, Advocate, for the applicant-
appellant.
The appeal in the case at hand has abated as the legal
heirs of deceased respondent have not been brought on record
within the prescribed period of limitation. Ordered accordingly.
March 18, 2025 (KS)
to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
M/s Thakur Enterprise Stone Crusher vs. Subhash
Singh and others
Civil Suit No.63 of 2024
.
18.03.2025 Present: Mr. Abhishek Verma, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Mr. Jai Ram Sharma, Advocate, for defendants No.1 to 8
and 10 to 12.
Defendant No.9 is stated to have expired.
Civil Suit No.63/2024 & OMP No.787 of 2024
Defendants No.1 to 8 and 10 to 12 were served way back
on 30.09.2024. Ever since then, time to file written statement/
reply is being sought. Even today, written statement/reply has
not been filed. Further time is being sought. By way of
indulgence, one last opportunity is granted to file written
statement/reply.
Let the needful be done on or before the next date of
hearing. List on 07.04.2025. It is made clear that if written
statement/reply is not filed on or before the next date of hearing,
then the right to file the same shall stand closed without further
reference to this Court.
Consequential steps for bringing on record the legal heirs
of deceased defendant No.9 be taken on or before the next date
of hearing.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 18, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
SJVNL vs. Gunni Ram (deceased) through LRs. And
others
RSA No.4 of 2024 a/w CO No.12 of 2024
.
18.03.2025 Present: Ms Shradha Karol, Advocate, through video conferencing,
for the appellant/non cross-objector.
Mr. Romesh Verma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Digvijay
Singh, Advocate, for respondents No.1 & 2/cross-
objectors.
Mr. Naresh K. Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.3/non
cross-objector.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant
submits that interest on the decretal amount, as ordered vide
order dated 09.01.2025, shall be deposited with the Registry of
this Court during the course of the day itself.
List after four weeks. Interim order to continue.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 18, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Sanjeev Gupta vs. Pawan Sahni and others
Civil Revision No.23 of 2016
.
18.03.2025 Present: Mr. Sudhir Thakur, Senior Advocate with Mr. Karun Negi,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. K.D. Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Het Ram Thakur,
Advocate, for the respondents.
Pleadings are complete.
At the request of learned counsel for the petitioner, list on
08.04.2025.r
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 18, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Manju Devi vs. Sunil Kumar
CMPMO No.741 of 2024
.
17.03.2025 Present: Mr. H.S. Rangra, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Vijay Mokhta, Advocate, vice Mr. Vijay Chaudhary,
Advocate, for the respondet.
List for consideration after four weeks.
March 17, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Bhagu Devi @ Anita Verma vs. Vinod Gazta
Cr. Revision No.486 of 2024
.
17.03.2025 Present: Mr. Jagat Pal, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Suneet Goel, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vivek Negi,
Advocate, for the respondent.
Cr.MP No.760 of 2025
The applicant-petitioner has preferred the present petition
against the judgment of conviction dated 24.01.2024 and order of
sentence dated 29.01.2024, passed by learned Chief Judicial
Magistrate, Shimla, in complaint No.1559 of 2019, titled Vinod
Gazta vs. Bhagu Devi, affirmed by learned Sessions Judge,
Shimla, District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, in Cr. Appeal No.19-
S/10 of 2024, titled as Bhagu Devi vs. Vinod Gazta, decided on
16.05.2024. The judgment of the trial Court and the 1 st Appellate
Court was confirmed by this Court on 02.01.2025.
The present application has been filed for compounding of
the offence, in the case at hand, as the present applicant has
brought a Demand Draft for the balance compensation amount to
be paid to the complainant/non-applicant. The Demand Draft so
prepared has been handed over to the counsel for the
complainant/non-applicant.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the non-applicant
does not intend to file reply to the application. He has no
objections, if in case, the present application is allowed, subject to
litigation costs. As per the learned counsel appearing on behalf of
the applicant, out of total compensation amount, Rs.3,00,000-
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
(Rupees Three Lacs) stands deposited before the learned trial
.
Court. The same already stands paid to the complainant.
The question with respect to maintainability of a petition
filed under Section 147 of N.I. Act post recording of conviction
and sentence being upheld by this Court in a revision came up for
consideration before this Court in Cr.MP No. 508 of 2023 in Cr.
Revision No. 332 of 2021, titled Naresh Kumar vs. Trilok
Chand, decided on 01.03.2023, wherein it was held that this
Court can proceed to compound offence punishable under
Section 138 of N.I.Act even after upholding the judgment of
conviction and order of sentence recorded by the learned trial
Court.
Consequently in view of aforesaid, this Court finds no
impediment in accepting the prayer made on behalf of the
applicant-petitioner through instant petition for compounding of
the offence and the same is allowed. Order dated 02.01.2025
passed in Cr. Revision No. 486 of 2024 is recalled. Matter is
ordered to be compounded inter se parties. Impugned judgments
of conviction and order of sentence passed by both the learned
Courts below are quashed and set aside. Accused is acquitted of
the offence punishable under Section 138 of the N.I. Act.
In terms of judgment passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in
Damodar S. Prabhu vs. Sayed Babalal H. (2010) 5 SCC 663,
the applicant petitioner shall pay compounding fee i.e. 15 % of
the cheque amount as costs. The same shall be paid to the H.P.
State Legal Services Authority, Kasumpati, Shimla, H.P. within
two months from today. It is made clear that the setting aside of
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
the conviction and order of sentence in the case at hand is
.
subject to applicant-petitioner depositing before H.P. State Legal
Services Authority 15 % of the cheque amount as costs.
The application stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 17, 2025 (KS) Judge
r to
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
The State of HP vs. Saruchi and others
CMPMO No.721 of 2024
.
17.03.2025 Present: Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the petitioner/State.
Respondent No.1 is proceeded against ex parte vide order
dated 10.01.2025.
At the request of learned Additional Advocate General, in
order to enable him to prepare the case, list the matter for
consideration after two weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 17, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Ajay Pal Singh vs. Mala Guleria
CMPMO No.706 of 2024
.
17.03.2025 Present: Mr. Kunal Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Kiran Kumar, Advocate, vice Mr. Nand Lal Thakur,
Advocate, for the respondent.
Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of the
respondent submits that the arguing counsel is unavailable today
adjournment.
r to
on account of bereavement in his family.
As prayed, list the matter after four weeks.
He seeks an
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 17, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Mansha Ram (deceased) through LRs. vs. Ram Lok
(deceased) through LRs. and others
CMPMO No.499 of 2015 with
.
CMPMO Nos.500 & 501 of 2015 with
17.03.2025 Present: Mr. Ishan Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners.
None for the respondents.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that an
appropriate application for bringing on record the legal heirs of
deceased respondent No.2(b) stands filed in the Registry of this
Court. Other than the aforesaid, he further submits that an
appropriate application for deletion of the name of deceased
respondent No.1(c) has also been filed in the Registry of this
Court. However, the applications so filed are not on record.
Registry to trace the applications and place them on
record well before the next date of hearing, post removal of
objection(s), if any.
List on 24.03.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 17, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Bansi Ram and others vs. Naina and others
RFA No.15 of 2025
.
17.03.2025 Present: Mr. Vinod Kumar Soni, Advocate, vice Mr. George,
Advocate, for the appellants.
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the
respondents, returnable within four weeks. No notices are being
issued to the proforma respondents, as their interests are stated
r to
to be the same as that of the appellants.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 17, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
The State of HP and another vs. Sawrup Singh
CMP No.3804 of 2025 in
RFA No.351 of 2011
.
17.03.2025 Present: Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the non-applicants/appellants/State.
Mr. R.K. Sharma, Senior Advocate with Ms. Anita,
Advocate, for the applicant/respondent.
CMP No.3804 of 2025
The appeal, in the case at hand, stands disposed of. The
amount, in the case at hand, is lying deposited with the
Reference Court. In view thereof, the present application is
misconceived. Hence, the same is dismissed.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 17, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
State of HP and others vs. Kanhaiya Lal and others
CMP No.854 of 2025 in
RFA No.374 of 2010
.
17.03.2025 Present: Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the non-applicants/appellants/State.
Ms. Anubhuti Sharma, Advocate, for the applicants/
respondents.
CMP No.854 of 2025
Learned counsel for the applicants submits that an
appropriate application for bringing on record the legal heirs of
deceased respondent No.3 is stated to have been filed in the
Registry of this Court. However, the same is not on record.
Registry to trace the application and place it on record well
before the next date of hearing, post removal of objection(s), if
any.
List after two weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 17, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Rajesh Kumar @ Girijesh Kumar vs. Yogesh Kumar
and another
Cr. Revision No.9 of 2025
.
17.03.2025 Present: Mr. Sumit Raj Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
None for respondent No.1.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.2/State.
Cr.MP No.796 of 2025
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is
allowed. Time for complying with order dated 06.01.2025 is
extended by two weeks from today, i.e., 17.03.2025.
The application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 17, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Prem Lata vs. Bimla Devi
Cr. Revision No.159 of 2024
.
17.03.2025 Present: Ms. Manjeet Kaur, Advocate, vice Mr. Naveen K.
Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Rajesh Mandhotra, Advocate, for the respondent.
Cr.MP No.795 of 2025
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is
allowed. Time for depositing 15% of the cheque amount as costs
before the Himachal Pradesh State Legal Services Authority,
Shimla, in terms of judgment dated 05.11.2024, passed in
Criminal Revision No.159 of 2024, is extended by four weeks
from today, i.e., 17.03.2025.
The application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 17, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Naresh Kumar vs. Gusain Ram and another
Cr. Revision No.423 of 2024
.
17.03.2025 Present: Mr. Subhash Chander, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Bodh Raj Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.2/State.
Cr.MP No.794 of 2025
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is
allowed. Time for depositing 5% of the cheque amount as costs
before the Himachal Pradesh State Legal Services Authority,
Shimla, in terms of judgment dated 08.01.2025, passed in
Criminal Revision No.423 of 2024, is extended by four weeks
from today, i.e., 17.03.2025.
The application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 17, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Surinder Singh Verma & anr. vs. Himachal Gramin
Bank
Cr. Revision No.6 of 2025
.
17.03.2025 Present: Mr. Kunal Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Ms. Rekha Bansal, Advocate, vice Mr. K.B. Khajuria,
Advocate, for the respondent.
Cr.MP No.781 of 2025
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is
allowed. Time for complying with order dated 03.01.2025 is
extended by four weeks from today, i.e., 17.03.2025.
The application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 17, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Sant Ram vs. Rajesh Kumar
Cr. Revision No.56 of 2025
.
17.03.2025 Present: Mr. Jagat Pal, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Cr.MP No.780 of 2025
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is
allowed. Time for complying with order dated 20.01.2025 is
extended by four weeks from today, i.e., 17.03.2025.
The application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 17, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:40 :::CIS
Kishori Lal vs. Ramesh Kumar and another
Cr. Revision No.22 of 2025
.
17.03.2025 Present: Mr. Lokesh Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. G.R. Palsra
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.2/State.
Cr.MP No.779 of 2025
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is
allowed. Time for complying with order dated 09.01.2025 is
extended by two weeks from today, i.e., 17.03.2025.
In order dated 09.01.2025, in place of “learned Sessions
Judge, Kangra at Dharamshala, District Kangra”, it should be
read as “learned Sessions Judge, Mandi, District Mandi”.
Registry to carry out necessary corrections accordingly.
The application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 17, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Naresh Kumar vs. State of HP
Cr.MP(M) No.353 of 2025
.
17.03.2025 Present: Mr. N.S. Chandel, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vinod Kumar
Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondent/State.
ASI Jaswinder Singh, Police Station, Nalagarh, District
Solan, is present in person.
Notice of the present petition was given to the complainant
through the concerned Police. A copy of the notice so sent has
been placed on record duly accepted by the complainant.
In the aforesaid circumstance and in the interest of justice,
list the matter on 24.03.2025. Let the complainant be again
informed about the next date of hearing.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 17, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Prem Chand vs. UCO Bank
Cr.MP No.704 of 2025 in
Cr. Revision No.230 of 2023
.
17.03.2025 Present: Mr. Servedaman Rathore, Advocate, for the petitioner/
applicant.
None for the respondent.
Inadvertent typographical error has crept in the judgment
dated 10.01.2025, insofar as details qua the Criminal Revision
petition number is concerned. The judgment shows that it has
been passed in Criminal Revision No.230 of 2024, whereas, it
has been passed in Criminal Revision No.230 of 2023.
The said inadvertent typographical error is ordered to be
rectified. Time for depositing 5% of the cheque amount, in terms
of judgment dated 10.01.2025, passed in Criminal Revision
No.230 of 2023, is extended by two weeks from today, i.e.,
17.03.2025.
The application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 17, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Surinder Paul (since deceased) through LRs and
others vs. Tilak Raj and others
CMP(M) No.295 of 2025
.
17.03.2025 Present: Mr. Atharv Sharma, Advocate, for the applicants-
appellants.
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the
respondents, returnable within four weeks.
March 17, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
The State of H.P. and others vs. Pritma Devi and
others
CMP(M) No.265 of 2025
.
17.03.2025 Present: Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
applicants-appellants/State.
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the
respondents, returnable within four weeks.
March 17, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
State of H.P. vs. Labhu
CMP(M) No.253 of 2025
.
17.03.2025 Present: Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
applicant-appellant/State.
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the
respondent, returnable within four weeks.
March 17, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
State of H.P. and others vs. Tej Singh and another
CMP(M) No.170 of 2025
.
17.03.2025 Present: Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
applicants-appellants/State.
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the
respondents, returnable within four weeks.
March 17, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
State of H.P. and another vs. Balak Ram
RFA No.242 of 2019
.
17.03.2025 Present: Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
appellants/State.
Mr. Ramesh Chand Sharma, Advocate, for the
respondent.
CMP No.132 of 2025
For the reasons stated in the application, early hearing of
the appeal is allowed. The application stands disposed of.
RFA No.242 of 2019
List for hearing in the second week of July, 2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 17, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Collector, Land Acquisition vs. Bhadar @ Bhadru &
Others
RFA No.88 of 2017
.
17.03.2025 Present: Ms. Shreya Chauhan, Advocate, for the appellant.
Ms. Manjeet Kaur, Advocate, vice Mr. Naveen K.
Bhardwaj, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 4/applicants.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for
respondents No.5/State.
CMP No.121 of 2025
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicant.
Heard counsel for the parties. Perused the pleadings. For
the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. 50%
of the enhanced amount of compensation along with
proportionate interest lying deposited in the Registry of this Court
is ordered to be released to the applicants in terms of shares
detailed in Paragraph-3 of the application. The amount be
remitted to the bank accounts, details whereof, have been given
in the same paragraph of the application, subject to proper
verification. The application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 17, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
State of HP and others vs. Rattan Singh
RSA No.30 of 2025
.
17.03.2025 Present: Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
appellants-State.
Learned Additional Advocate General submits that similar
matters are posted for 10.04.2025, therefore, prays for listing of
the same on the said date. Prayer allowed.
List on 10.04.2025.
March 17, 2025 (KS)
to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Rajinder Singh and others vs. Mohinder Kumar
Civil Suit No.14 of 2025
.
17.03.2025 Present: Mr. Peeyush Verma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ajay
Kumar, Advocate, for the plaintiffs.
Civil Suit No.14 of 2025 & OMP No.100 of 2025
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the sole
respondent, returnable for 23.04.2025.
OMP No.101 of 2025
Allowed and the applicants are exempted from filing
English translation of the vernacular documents, in question,
annexed with the accompanying plaint, at this stage, subject to
filing of the same within seven days, as and when directed to do
so.
The application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 17, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Durga Dass vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and others
CMP(M) No.14 of 2025
.
17.03.2025 Present: Mr. Hemant Kumar Thakur, Advocate, for the applicant/
appellant.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.1/State.
Mr. Tarun K. Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.2 & 3.
r to
Reply be filed within four weeks. List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 17, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Deepan Kumar Hastir and another vs. Sampat Kumar
and others
CMP(M) No.2018 of 2024
.
17.03.2025 Present: None for the petitioners.
List on 08.04.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 17, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Banarsi Dass (deceased) through LRs. vs. Bvaldev
Singh (deceased) through LRs. and others
Civil Revision No.67 of 2020
.
13.03.2025 Present: Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate with Ms. Rinki
Kashmiri, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. K.D. Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sanjeev Sood,
Advocate, for respondents No.2() to 2(d).
Respondents No.1(a) to 1(d) and 3(a) to 3(c) proceeded
against ex parte vide order dated 22.09.2021. .
r to
Learned counsel for the petitioners has placed
reliance upon the decisions of this Court in Milkhi Ram and
others vs. Raghunandan and others, 1982 Sim L.C. 191 and
CMPMO No.341 of 2014, decided on 22.04.2021.
Per contra, learned counsel for the respondents has
placed reliance upon the decision of this Court in RSA No.537 of
2008, decided on 07.09.2021.
Learned counsel for the parties intend to go through the
same.
List for consideration on 23.04.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 13, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Banarsi Dass (deceased) through LRs. vs. Bvaldev
Singh (deceased) through LRs. and others
Civil Revision No.67 of 2020
.
13.03.2025 Present: Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate with Ms. Rinki
Kashmiri, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. K.D. Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sanjeev Sood,
Advocate, for respondents No.2() to 2(d).
Respondents No.1(a) to 1(d) and 3(a) to 3(c) proceeded
against ex parte vide order dated 22.09.2021. .
r to
Learned counsel for the petitioners has placed
reliance upon the decisions of this Court in Milkhi Ram and
others vs. Raghunandan and others, 1982 Sim L.C. 191 and
CMPMO No.341 of 2014, decided on 22.04.2021.
Per contra, learned counsel for the respondents has
placed reliance upon the decision of this Court in RSA No.537 of
2008, decided on 07.09.2021.
Learned counsel for the parties intend to go through the
same.
List for consideration on 23.04.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 13, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Dr. Susheel Kumar Negi vs. Dr. Sudesh
CMPMO No.628 of 2024
.
13.03.2025 Present: Mr. Nishant Khidtta, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Sudhir Thakur, Senior Advocate with Mr. Karun Negi,
Advocate, for the respondent.
CMP No.3462 of 2025
Heard counsel for the parties. Perused the pleadings.
r to
Both the counsels agree that on the date of passing of
order dated 10.01.2025, the total amount payable, as arrears of
maintenance, is Rs.3,60,000/-. Out of the said amount of
Rs.3,60,000/-, a sum of Rs.1,70,000/- stands paid by the
petitioner, as a consequence whereof, the only amount payable
till 10.01.2025, admittedly is Rs.1,90,000/- only. Learned counsel
is permitted to deposit the aforesaid arrears by way of a bank
draft amounting to Rs.1,90,000/- in pursuance to order dated
10.01.2025. Let the needful be done within one week.
The application stands disposed of.
CMPMO No.628 of 2024
List for consideration after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 13, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Ram Krishan (deceased) through LRs. And others vs.
Ghambaru Devi (deceased) through LR.
RSA No.438 of 2007
.
13.03.2025 Present: Mr. K.D. Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sanjeev Sood,
Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Udit Shaurya Kaushik, Advocate, vice Mr. Nitin Thakur,
Advocate, for respondent No.1(a).
At the pleasure of Hon’ble the Chief Justice, list before
r to
another appropriate Bench.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 13, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Bimla Devi vs. M/s Bitttam Garages
CMP No.8779 of 2023 in
RSA No.310 of 2008
.
13.03.2025 Present: Mr. K.D. Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sanjeev Sood,
Advocate, for the applicant.
Mr. Bimal Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Trigun Singh
Negi, Advocate, for the respondent.
Rejoinder is stated to have been filed. However, the same
is not on record.
Registry to trace the rejoinder and place it on record well
before the next date of hearing, post removal of objection(s), if
any.
List after four weeks. The matter be listed in the category
of “Order”.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 13, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Anjan Mahajan vs. Binta Devi and others
Civil Revision No.4 of 2025
.
13.03.2025 Present: Mr. Sudhir Thakur, Senior Advocate with Mr. Karun Negi,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
At the request of learned counsel for the petitioner, list on
17.03.2025.
March 13, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Nand Chand (deceased) through his LR Som Raj vs.
Ashish Kumar and others
RSA No.216 of 2024
.
13.03.2025 Present: Mr. B.S. Chauhan, Senior advocate with Mr. Abhishek
Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Sahil Dixit, Advocate, vice Mr. Dheeraj K. Vashisht,
Advocate, for respondents No.1 & 2.
None for respondent No.3.
weeks.
r to
Records of the Court below be called for. List after six
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 13, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Suresh Kumar (deceased) through LRs. vs. Kashmiro
Devi
RSA No.208 of 2024
.
13.03.2025 Present: Mr. Ashwani K. Sharma, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Y.P. Sood, Advocate, for the respondent.
At the joint request of learned counsel for the parties, list for
consideration on 01.04.2025.
March 13, 2025 (KS)
to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
The State of Himachal Pradesh and others vs. Jindu
Ram(deceased) through LRs. and others
RSA No.103 of 2024
.
13.03.2025 Present: Mr. Gautam Sood, Deputy Advocate General, for the
appellants/State.
Mr. Manish Kumar Gupta, Advocate, for the respondents,
except respondent No.9.
Respondent No.9 proceeded against ex parte vide order
dated 13.08.2024.
10.04.2025.
r to
At the joint request of learned counsel for the parties, list on
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 13, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
State of Himachal Pradesh vs. Gian Chand
RSA No.24 of 2025
.
13.03.2025 Present: Mr. Gautam Sood, Deputy Advocate General, for the
appellant/State.
Mr. Suraj Kumar, Advocate, vice Mr. Tarun K. Sharma,
Advocate, for the proposed LRs. No.1(a) to 1(c).
At the request of learned vice counsel appearing on behalf
of the proposed LRs.No.1(a) to 1(c), list the matter for admission
after ten days.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 13, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Ruchi Maggo and another vs. Balraj Maggo and others
CMPMO No.1 of 2025
.
13.03.2025 Present: Mr. Jeevesh Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Romesh Verma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sumit
Sharma, Advocate, for the respondents.
List for consideration after four weeks.
March 13, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
The Principal Secretary & anr. vs. Situ Devi
RFA No.49 of 2022
.
13.03.2025 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
appellants/State.
Mr. R.K. Sharma, Senior Advocate with Ms. Vidushi
Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.1(a)(i) to 1(a)(vi)
and 1(b).
CMP(M) No.397 of 2021
r to
Since the appeal, in the case at hand, stands registered
and admitted vide order dated 13.04.2022, therefore, the present
application has become infructuous. The application stands
disposed of.
RFA No.49 of 2022
Further time prayed by learned counsel appearing on
behalf of respondents No.1(a)(i) to 1(a)(vi) and 1(b) for filing
power of attorney on their behalf.
Let the needful be done within four weeks. List thereafter.
In the meanwhile, amended memo of parties be also filed.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 13, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Jagdish and another vs. Suman and others
RSA No.87 of 2020
.
13.03.2025 Present: Mr. Sahil Dixit, Advocate, vice Mr. Naresh K. Sharma,
Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. H.M. Thakur, vice Mr. Aman Parth Sharma, Advocate,
for respondents No.1 & 2.
Mr. Paras Dhaulta, Advocate, for respondent No.6.
None for respondents No.3, 4(i) to 4(iii), 5, 7 to 9, 11 to 14,
16, 18(ii), 18(v), 18(viii).
Name of respondent No.10 stands deleted vide order
dated 14.08.2018.
As per report of the Registry, notice issued to respondent
No.19 had been received back with the report that the said
respondent has died. The same has been observed in order
dated 12.12.2022. Till date, her legal heirs are not brought on
record. Accordingly, appeal has abated insofar as respondent
No.19 is concerned.
Insofar as respondents No.18(iii), 18(iv), and 18(vi) are
concerned, time is being sought since 05.04.2021. Let the
needful be done within two weeks. Otherwise, consequences on
account of non prosecution would ensue.
List for consideration after two weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 13, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
State of Himachal Pradesh and others vs. Laxmi Ram
and others
RFA No.81 of 2020
.
13.03.2025 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
appellants/State.
Mr. Ranvir Chauhan, Advocate, for respondents No.1, 2,
3(a) to 3(h), 4(a) to 4(d) and 5(a)
Respondent No.5 is stated to have expired.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents No.1,
2, 3(a) to 3(h), 4(a) to 4(d) and 5(a) submits that power of
attorney on behalf of the said respondents stands filed in the
Registry on 04.03.2025. Registry to trace the same and place it
on record well before the next date of hearing.
List after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 13, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
M/s Jaiprakash Associates Limited vs. Sihanu Ram
and others
RFA No.59 of 2017
.
13.03.2025 Present: Mr. Sumit Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. B.C. Verma,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Nand Lal Chauhan, Advocate, for proposed LRs
No.1(a) to 1(h).
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondents No.2 & 3/State.
Tech. r
CMP(M) No.1887 of 2024
Mr. Anil Kumar God, Advocate, for the respondent/ Ulta
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of legal heirs of
deceased respondent No.1 who have been served and put in
appearance through their counsel. Time is prayed on their behalf
to file power of attorney.
Other than the aforesaid, the non-applicants/legal heirs
have no objection if they are brought on record.
Respondent No.1 is stated to have died on 25.10.2022.
The same is evident from the Death Certificate appended along
with the present application as Annexure A-1. He is survived by
his legal heirs, details whereof, have been given in Paragraph-4
of the application. It is submitted that there is no other legal heir
insofar as respondent No.1 is concerned.
The right to sue inheres/survives with the aforesaid legal
heirs of deceased respondent No.1, therefore, they are ordered to
be brought on record.
For the bona fide reasons stated/sufficient cause shown in
the application. delay in bringing on record the legal heirs of
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
deceased respondent No.1, is condoned and abatement, if any, is
.
set aside.
The application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 13, 2025 (KS) Judge
r to
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
G.M. Northern Railway vs. Pritam Kuma and others
a/w connected matter
RFA of 60 of 2014 a/w RFA No.116 of 2014 and Cross-
.
Objections No.64 of 2014 and 03 of 2015.
13.03.2025 Present: Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Senior Panel Counsel, for the
appellant.
Respondent No.1 is stated to have expired.
Mr. Pawan Gautam, Advocate, for respondents No.2(a) &
2(b).
Mr. Gautam Sood, Deputy
respondent No.3-State.
r Advocate
CMP(M) Nos.1823 to 1825 & 1827 to 1829 of 2024 in
General, for
RFA Nos.60 and 116 of 2014
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that steps for
the service of proposed LRs No.1(a), 1(b), 2(c)(i) to 2(c)(iii) shall
be taken within a week. On taking such steps, issue notice to
the said respondents, returnable within four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 13, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Sita Ram vs. Krishan Lal and others
RSA No.68 of 2013
13.03.2025 Present: Mr. Malay Kaushal, Advocate, for the appellant.
.
Mr. P.S. Chandel, Advocate, for proposed respondents
No.1(a) to 1(f) and respondent No.2 to 4.
CMP(M) Nos.254 and 255 of 2025
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the legal
heirs of deceased respondent No.5, details whereof, have been
given in Paragraph-4 of the application (CMP(M) No.254 of
2025), returnable within four weeks.
CMP(M) Nos.1727 and 1728 of 2023
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicants. The non-applicants have no objection, if in case, the
applications are allowed and they are brought on record as is
being sought in the application (CMP(M) No.1727 of 2023).
Respondent No.1 is stated to have expired on 08.07.2015.
The same is evident from the Death Certificate appended along
with the application (CMP(M) No.1727 of 2023) as Annexure A-1.
He is survived by his legal heirs, details whereof, have been
given in Paragraph-4 of the application (CMP(M) No.1727 of
2023). The same is in consonance with the report of the
Revenue Officer (Patwari) appended with the application
(CMP(M) No.1727 of 2023).
Since the right to sue inheres/survives with the aforesaid
legal heirs of deceased respondent No.1, therefore, they are
ordered to be brought on record.
For the bona fide reasons stated/sufficient cause shown in
the application (CMP(M) No.1728 of 2023), delay in bringing on
record the legal heirs of deceased respondent No.1, is condoned
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
and abatement, if any, is set aside.
.
The applications stand disposed of.
CMP(M) Nos.256 and 257 of 2025
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicants. The non-applicants have no objection, if in case, the
applications are allowed and they are brought on record as is
being sought in the application (CMP(M) No.256 of 2025).
Respondent No.6 is stated to have expired on 08.12.2023.
The same is evident from the Death Certificate appended along
with the application (CMP(M) No.256 of 2025) as Annexure A-1.
He is survived by his legal heirs, details whereof, have been
given in Paragraph-4 of the application (CMP(M) No.256 of
2025). The same is in consonance with the report of the
Revenue Officer (Patwari) appeded with the application (CMP(M)
No.256 of 2025).
Since the right to sue inheres/survives with the aforesaid
legal heirs of deceased respondent No.6, therefore, they are
ordered to be brought on record.
For the bona fide reasons stated/sufficient cause shown in
the application (CMP(M) No.257 of 2025), delay in bringing on
record the legal heirs of deceased respondent No.6, is condoned
and abatement, if any, is set aside.
The applications stand disposed of.
CMP(M) No.258 and 259 of 2025
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicants. The non-applicants have no objection, if in case, the
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
applications are allowed and they are brought on record as is
.
being sought in the application (CMP(M) No.258 of 2025).
Respondent No.8 is stated to have expired on 29.10.2020.
The same is evident from the Death Certificate appended along
with the application (CMP(M) No.258 of 2025) as Annexure A-1.
He is survived by his legal heirs, details whereof, have been
given in Paragraph-4 of the application (CMP(M) No.258 of
2025). The same is in consonance with the report of the
Revenue Officer (Patwari) appeded with the application (CMP(M)
No.258 of 2025).
Since the right to sue inheres/survives with the aforesaid
legal heirs of deceased respondent No.8, therefore, they are
ordered to be brought on record.
For the bona fide reasons stated/sufficient cause shown in
the application (CMP(M) No.259 of 2025), delay in bringing on
record the legal heirs of deceased respondent No.8, is condoned
and abatement, if any, is set aside.
The applications stand disposed of.
RSA No.68 of 2013
Amended memo of parties be filed within four weeks. List
thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 13, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Shankar Dass and others vs. Dharam Chand
(deceased) through LRs. and others
RSA No.64 of 2011
.
13.03.2025 Present: Ms. Anchal Sharma, Advocate, for appellants No.1 to 5.
Appellant No.6 is stated to have expired.
Ms Tim Saran, Advocate, for respondents No.1, 3, 4, 8
and 9(a) to 9(d).
None for remaining respondents.
r to
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of appellants No.1 to
5 submits that power of attorney on behalf of the said appellants
shall be filed on or before the next date of hearing Besides the
aforesaid, learned counsel submits that steps for bringing on
record the legal heirs of appellant No.6 would also be taken
during the same time.
List after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 13, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Sant Ram vs. Prem Raj and others
RSA No.352 of 2010
.
13.03.2025 Present: Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate with Ms. Rinki
Kashmiri, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Anirudh Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.1 & 2.
None for remaining respondents.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that steps for
effecting service of respondent No.5(a)(i) shall be taken during
the course of the day. On taking such steps, issue notice to the
said respondents, returnable within four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 13, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Lila Devi vs. Sarla Devi
RSA No.244 of 2010
.
13.03.2025 Present: Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate with Ms. Rinki
Kashmiri, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent.
CMP No.1125 of 2025
For the reasons stated in the application, early hearing of
RSA No.244 of 2010
r to
the appeal is allowed. The application stands disposed of.
List on 04.04.2025. In terms of order dated 27.05.2024,
report of Local Commissioner along with reply and objections filed
thereto, in terms of order dated 21.08.2023, shall be considered
at the time of final hearing.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 13, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
BBMB and another vs. Ashwani Kumar and others
RFA No.116 of 2010
.
13.03.2025 Present: Mr. Hemant Kumar Sharma, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Amit Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 6, 9,
11 to 18, 19(a) to 19(g), 20, 22(a) 27 and 28(a) to 28(c).
No notice issued to respondent No.22(b) and 22(c) vide
order dated 19.09.2024.
Ms. Vishali Lakhanpal, Advocate, vice Mr. Parv Sharma,
Advocate, for respondents No.7 and respondents No.8(a),
8(f) and 8(g).
Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Senior Panel Counsel, for
respondent No.29.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.30/State.
RFA No.116 of 2010
Time sought to take steps for the service of respondents
No.8(c) to 8(e) by filing their correct address(es) and process fee.
Let the needful be done within one week.
On taking such steps, issue notice to the said
respondents, returnable within four weeks.
CMP(M) Nos.1382 & 1383 of 2024
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicant/legal heir. The non-applicant/legal heir of deceased
respondent No.22, who has been served and has filed his power
of attorney, has no objection, if in case he is ordered to be
brought on record as is being sought in the application (CMP(M)
Nos.1382 of 2024).
Respondent No.22 is stated to have expired on
23.12.2023. The same is evident from the Death Certificate
appended along with the application (CMP(M) Nos.1382 of 2024)
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
as Annexure-A (colly). He is survived by his legal heirs, details
.
whereof, have been given in Annexure-A (colly). The same is in
consonance with the details of the legal heirs given in Paragraph-
5 of the application (CMP(M) No.1382 of 2024).
By virtue of a Will, the entire property of the deceased
respondent No.22 is bequeathed on his son, i.e., Naveen Jaswal
– proposed respondent No.22(a) and in furtherance thereof, a
mutation also stands attested, therefore, the right to sue
inheres/survives with the said legal heir of deceased respondent
No.22. Accordingly, legal heir of deceased respondent No.22,
i.e., Naveen Jaswal- proposed respondent No.22(a) is ordered to
be brought on record.
For the bona fide reasons stated/sufficient cause shown in
the application (CMP(M) Nos.1383 of 2024), delay in bringing on
record the legal heir of deceased respondent No.22, is
condoned and abatement, if any, is set aside.
The applications stand disposed of. Amended memo of
parties appended with the applications is taken on record.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 13, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Duni Chand vs. Narpat (deceased) through LRs. and
others
RSA No.232 of 2009
.
13.03.2025 Present: Mr. R.K. Sharma, Senior Advocate with Ms. Anita,
Advocate, fo the appellants.
Mr. S.D. Gill, Advocate, for respondents No.1(a) to 1(c)
and 2(a) to 2(d).
Mr. Sumit Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. B.C. Verma,
Advocate, for respondents No.5 to 9, 10(a) to 10(i) and 11.
None for respondents No.12(a).
Mr. S.D. Gill, Advocate, has put in appearance on behalf of
respondents No.2(a) to 2(d), hence, they are not required to be
served.
List for hearing in due course.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 13, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Bal Krishan vs. Satya Devi and others
RSA No.207 of 2009
.
13.03.2025 Present: Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate with Ms. Rinki
Kashmiri, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Arvind Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.1, 3 and
4.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents No.1,
3 and 4 submits that though on instructions he has put in
appearance on behalf of respondents No.2(a) & 2(b), but till date
the said respondents have not come forward to file appropriate
power of attorney(s). In view thereof, respondents No.2(a) and
2(b) are proceeded against ex parte.
List for hearing in due course.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 13, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Brij Bala vs. Uttam Singh(deceased) through LRs. and
others
RSA No.159 of 2008
.
13.03.2025 Present: Mr. Ajay Chandel, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.1(a)
to 1(c), 2(a), 4(a), 6 to 10.
Respondents No.3 & 5 are stated to have expired.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that an
appropriate application for bringing on record the legal heirs of
deceased respondent No.5 has been filed in the Registry today
itself.
Other than the aforesaid, learned counsel appearing on
behalf of the appellant submits that insofar as respondent No.3 is
concerned, he has also died and an appropriate application for
deletion of his name has already been filed, as his legal heirs are
already on record. The applications so filed are not on record.
Registry to trace the applications and place them on
record well before the next date of hearing, post removal of
objection(s), if any.
List after three weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 13, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Land Acquisition Collector, HP PWD and another vs.
Kalyan Singh and others
RFA No.178 of 2007
.
13.03.2025 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
appellants/State.
Ms. Shashi Kiran, Advocate, for proposed respondents
No.1(a) to 1(e).
None for the remaining respondents.
CMP(M) No.959 of 2024 & CMP(M) No.960 of 2024
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicants/legal heirs. The non-applicants/legal heirs of deceased
respondent No.1, who have been served and have filed their
power of attorney, have no objection, if in case they are brought
on record as is being sought in the application (CMP(M) No.959
of 2024).
Respondent No.1 is stated to have expired on 26.10.2023.
The same is evident from the Death Certificate appended along
with the application (CMP(M) No.959 of 2024) as Annexure A-2.
He is survived by his legal heirs, details whereof, have been
given in Annexure A-1. The same is in consonance with the
details of the legal heirs given in Paragraph-5 of the application
(CMP(M) No.959 of 2024).
Since the right to sue inheres/survives with the aforesaid
legal heirs of deceased respondent No.1, therefore, they are
ordered to be brought on record.
For the bona fide reasons stated/sufficient cause shown in
the application (CMP(M) No.960 of 2024), delay in bringing on
record the legal heirs of deceased respondent No.1, is
condoned and abatement, if any, is set aside.
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
The applications stand disposed of.
.
Amended memo of parties appended with the applications
is taken on record.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 13, 2025 (KS) Judge
r to
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Gautam Kumar vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Cr.MP(M) No.512 of 2025
.
13.03.2025 Present: Mr. Harsh Sharol, Advocate, vice Mr. Manoj Pathak,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
Notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate
General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the
respondent-State and seeks time to file status report.
r Status
report be filed on or before the next date of hearing.
List on 11.04.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 13, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Satvir Minhas vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Cr.MP(M) No.509 of 2025
.
13.03.2025 Present: Mr. Umesh Kanwar, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondents/State.
Notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate
General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the
respondent-State and seeks time to file status report.
report be filed on or before the next date of hearing.
List on 17.03.2025.
Status
The petitioner-accused apprehends his arrest in a case
registered against him vide FIR No.2 of 2025 dated 08.01.2025,
under Sections 420, 468, 471, 120-B of the Indian Penal Code
and Sections 13(1A) & (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act,
2018 at Police Station, SV & ACB, Una, District Una, Himachal
Pradesh.
In view of the averments in the application and also the
submissions made by learned counsel, it is directed that in the
event of arrest of the petitioner-accused in this case, he shall be
released on bail subject to his furnishing personal bonds in the
sum of Rs. 50,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the
satisfaction of the arresting Police Officer/Investigating Officer,
subject to following conditions:-
(i) Petitioner, at the first instance, shall appear before
the Investigating Officer, Police Station, SV & ACB,
Una, District Una, H.P., on 15.03.2025 at 11.30 a.m;
(ii) Petitioner shall join the investigation of case as and
when called for by the Investigating Officer in
accordance with law;
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
(iii). Petitioner shall not hamper the investigation in any
manner whatsoever;
.
(iv). Petitioner shall not contact the complainant(s),
threaten or browbeat them or to use any pressure
tactics in any manner whatsoever;
(v). Petitioner shall not leave India without prior
permission of the Court;
(vii). Petitioner shall not make any inducement threat or
promise, directly or indirectly, to the investigating officer
or any person acquainted with the facts of the case to
dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the Courtor any Police Officer or tamper with the evidence.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 13, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Dharmender Singh vs. Devi Singh and others
Civil Revision No.126 of 2022
.
13.03.2025 Present: Mr. Kiran Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raju Ram Rahi, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Kulwant Singh Chauhan, Advocate, for respondents
No.4 to 8.
Respondents No.2 & 3 proceeded against ex parte vide
order dated 10.10.2022.
r to
At the request of learned counsel for the petitioner, list for
consideration on 22.03.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 13, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Dharam Pal vs. Shahnaz Begum
Civil Suit No.58 of 2022
.
13.03.2025 Present: Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Mr. Ajay Sipahiya, Advocate, for the defendant.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the defendant
submits that against order dated 13.11.2024, passed in OMP
No.395 of 2023 in the present Civil Suit, an appropriate appeal
has been preferred before a Division Bench of this Court and the
same is listed for consideration on 27.03.2025.
In view thereof, list the matter for consideration on
01.04.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 13, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Attar Singh and another vs. Banka Devi and others
RSA No.40 of 2025
.
13.03.2025 Present: Mr. Sushil Chauhan, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Romesh Verma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sumit
Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.1 and 2/caveators.
Caveat Petition No.749 of 2024
Allowed and discharged.
RSA No.40 of 2025
Notice. Mr. Sumit Sharma, learned counsel, appears and
waives service of notice on behalf of respondents No.1 and 2.
List for consideration on 18.03.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 13, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
HPSEBL Vs. Bala Ram & Ors.
CMP Nos.972, 973, 1421, 1422, 1423, 1424, 1425
and 1426 of 2025 in RFA No.248 of 2010
.
12.03.2025 Present: Ms. Sunita Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Dhananjay
Sharma, Advocate, fo the non-applicant/appellant.
Mr. Ishan Sharma, Advocate, for the applicants/
respondent.
CMP No.972 of 2025
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicant. The non-applicant has no objection if in case the
amount lying deposited in this Registry of this Court along-with
proportionate interest accrued thereupon, is released in favour of
the applicants.
The appeal, in the case at hand, was decided on
30.10.2017. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on
behalf of the applicants that no further proceedings against the
said decision are pending before the Hon’ble Apex Court.
The applicants are the legal heirs of deceased respondent
No.3. They are entitled to 1/3rd share of the deceased respondent
No.3.
Besides the aforesaid 1/3rd share, they are entitled to half
share of respondent No.1, as ordered vide order dated
20.09.2017. The aforesaid share has to be distributed equally
amongst the legal heirs 3(a) to 3(f).
In view of the aforesaid, for the reasons stated in the
application, the same is allowed. The amount deposited in the
Registry of this Court along-with proportionate interest accrued
thereupon is ordered to be released in favour of the applicants in
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
terms of their share(s), detailed in Paragraph-2 of the application
.
and as has been discussed herein above. The amount be
remitted to the bank accounts, details whereof, have been given
in relief clause of the present application, subject to proper
verification. The application stands disposed of.
CMP No.973 of 2025
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is
allowed. The applicants are exempted from filing the translated
copies of the documents in question.
The application stands disposed of.
CMP No.1421 of 2025
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicant. The non-applicant has not objection if in case the
amount lying deposited in this Registry of this Court along-with
proportionate interest accrued thereupon, is released in favour of
the applicants.
The appeal, in the case at hand, was decided on
30.10.2017. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on
behalf of the applicants that no further proceedings against the
said decision are pending before the Hon’ble Apex Court.
The present applicant, i.e., Smt. Bimla Devi is the legal
heir of deceased respondent No.2. Deceased respondent No.2,
i.e., Rattan Chand was entitled to 1/ 3 rd share of the total
compensation amount awarded in the case at hand.
The aforesaid amount, by virtue of Will which has been
placed on record was to be apportioned between the present
applicant and Hira Singh, the other legal heir. As a consquence,
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
the present applicant is entitled to 1/ 6 th share of the amount
.
payable to deceased Rattan Chand. The amount lying deposited
in the Registry of this Court, due and payable to deceased Rattan
Chand along-with proportionate interest accrued thereupon be
released in favour of the present applicant, in terms of share as
has been detailed (supra). The amount be remitted to the bank
account, details whereof, have been given in relief clause of the
present application, subject to proper verification. The application
stands disposed of.
CMP No.1422 of 2025
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is
allowed. The applicant is exempted from filing the translated
copies of the documents in question.
The application stands disposed of.
CMP No.1426 of 2025
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is
allowed. The delay in re-filing the application for release is
condoned. The application stands disposed of.
CMP No.1424 of 2025
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicant. The non-applicant has no objection if in case the
amount lying deposited in this Registry of this Court along-with
proportionate interest accrued thereupon, is released in favour of
the applicants.
The appeal, in the case at hand, was decided on
30.10.2017. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
behalf of the applicants that no further proceedings against the
said decision are pending before the Hon’ble Apex Court.
.
The present applicant, i.e., Hira Singh is the legal heir of
deceased respondent No.2. Deceased respondent No.2, i.e.,
Rattan Chand was entitled to 1/ 3 rd share of the total
compensation amount awarded in the case at hand.
The aforesaid amount, by virtue of Will which has been
placed on record was to be apportioned between the present
applicant and Bimla Devi, the other legal heir. As a consquence,
the present applicant is entitled to 1/ 6 th share of the amount
payable to deceased Rattan Chand. The amount lying deposited
in the Registry of this Court, due and payable to deceased Rattan
Chand along-with proportionate interest accrued thereupon be
released in favour of the present applicant, in terms of share as
has been detailed (supra). The amount be remitted to the bank
account, details whereof, have been given in relief clause of the
present application, subject to proper verification. The application
stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 12, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Prem Singh @ Durga Dass Vs. Chaman Lal
RSA No.38 of 2025
.
12.03.2025 Present: Mr. H.S. Rangra, Advocate, for the appellant.
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the sole
respondent on substantial questions of law framed at page No.7,
wrongly numbered as 4 and 5 instead of 3 and 4, returnable
within four weeks.
CMP No.3775 of 2025
Notice in the aforesaid terms.
In the meanwhile, operation and execution of judgment
and decree dated 06.11.2024 passed by Addl. District Judge,
Sarkaghat, District Mandi, HP in Civil Appeal No.11 of 2022, titled
Prem Singh @ Durga Dass Vs. Chaman Lal shall remain stayed.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 12, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Prem Singh @ Durga Dass Vs. Chaman Lal
RSA No.38 of 2025
.
12.03.2025 Present: Mr. H.S. Rangra, Advocate, for the appellant.
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the sole
respondent on substantial questions of law framed at page No.7,
wrongly numbered as 4 and 5 instead of 3 and 4, returnable
within four weeks.
CMP No.3775 of 2025
Notice in the aforesaid terms.
In the meanwhile, operation and execution of judgment
and decree dated 06.11.2024 passed by Addl. District Judge,
Sarkaghat, District Mandi, HP in Civil Appeal No.11 of 2022, titled
Prem Singh @ Durga Dass Vs. Chaman Lal shall remain stayed.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 12, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Pawan Vs. Indu Bansal & Ors.
CMPMO No.622 of 2024
.
12.03.2025 Present: Mr. V.S. Chauhan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Arsh Chauhan,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Ankit Dhiman, Advocate, for the respondents.
List on 09.04.2025.
March 12, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Paras Ram Vs. Prem Chand & Anr.
RSA No.199 of 2023
.
12.03.2025 Present: Mr. Dinesh Kumar Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Imran Khan, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Ashok Kumar Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
At the request of learned counsel for the appellant, list
after four weeks.
r ( Bipin C. Negi )
March 12, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Sumeer Nath Vs. Pran Nath Bahl
Civil Revision No.64 of 2023
.
12.03.2025 Present: Mr. Suneet Goel, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vishwash Kaushal,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Ms. Drishti Sirswal, Advocate, for the respondent.
Record received.
Learned counsel for the parties intend to go through the
same.
List after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 12, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Narinder Kumar Vs. Jatinder Kumar
RSA No.288 of 2022
.
12.03.2025 Present: Mr. Jeet Ram Poswal, Advocate, for the appellant.
Ms. Rinki Kashmiri, Advocate, for the respondent.
Further time prayed by learned counsel for the appellant to
go through the record. List after four weeks.
March 12, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Satish Kumar vs. Sub Divisional Officer and others
CMPMO No.231 of 2021
.
12.03.2025 Present: Mr. Romesh Verma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Tarun
Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Gautam Sood, Deputy Advocate General, for
respondent No.1-State.
Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Atharv
Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.3 to 5 & 7 to 12.
Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the Gram
Panchayat has no jurisdiction to enter into the controversy in the
case at hand.
In view of the aforesaid, learned counsel for the
respondents seek time to prepare the case.
List after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 12, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
The Principal Secretary and others vs. Kanshi Ram
(deceased) through LRs.
RSA No.112 of 2024
.
12.03.2025 Present: Mr. Gautam Sood, Deputy Advocate General, for the
appellants/State.
Mr. Malay Kaushal, Advocate, for the respondents.
Record stands received. Learned counsel for the parties
intend to go through the same. As prayed, list on 10.04.2025.
r ( Bipin C. Negi )
March 12, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Sudesh Sood and another vs. Abhishek Vashisht and
another
CMPMO No.111 of 2024
.
12.03.2025 Present: Mr. R.K. Bawa, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ajay Kumar
Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Pranjal Munjal, Advocate, vice Ms. Jyotika Gupta,
Advocate, for the respondents.
As jointly prayed, list on 25.03.2025.
March 12, 2025 (KS)
to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
State of H.P. and another vs. Piar Singh and another
RSA No.88 of 2024
.
12.03.2025 Present: Mr. Manish Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for the
appellants/State.
Mr. Vinod K. Gupta, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Senior Panel Counsel, for
respondent No.2.
Record stands received. Learned counsel for the parties
intend to go through the same.
r List for consideration on
10.04.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 12, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Mangal Singh and others vs. Onkar Dei and others
RSA No.85 of 2024
.
12.03.2025 Present: Ms. Bhawana, Advocate, vice Mr. Naresh Kumar Verma,
Advocate, for the petitioners.
Ms. Vandana Kumari, Advocate, vice Mr. Sanjay Jaswal,
Advocate, for respondent No.1.
None for respondents No.2 and 3 though served.
Fresh steps for the service of respondents No.4 & 5, by
way of filing correct address, be taken within three days. On
taking such steps, issue notice to the said respondents,
returnable within four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 12, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Chander Shekhar Banta vs. Padam Dass and others
CMPMO No.27 of 2024
.
12.03.2025 Present: Mr. Sumit Sood, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. G.D. Verma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sumit Sharma,
Advocate, for the respondents.
As jointly prayed, list on 22.03.2025.
March 12, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Ram Parkash and others vs. Rajinder Kumar and
others
RSA No.503 of 2000
.
12.03.2025 Present: Mr. Bimal Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Trigun Singh
Negi, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. K.D. Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Het Ram Thakur,
Advocate, for respondents No.1(a), 1(b), 2(a) to 2(d), 3, 4
and 14(a) to 14(f).
At the request of learned counsel for the appellants, list on
24.03.2025.r
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 12, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Land Acquisition Collector and another vs. Ram
Swaroop and others
CMP No.381 of 2025 in RFA No.364 of 2004
.
12.03.2025 Present: Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
appellants/State.
Mr. Vijay Sharma, Advocate, for the respondents/
applicants.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicants,
who has filed the present application seeks time to ascertain as to
whether his power of attorney exists on record.
List on 09.04.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 12, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Vanita Dhanotia vs. State of HP and another
Execution Petition No.75 of 2025
.
12.03.2025 Present: Mr. Arsh Dhanotia, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.1/State.
Mr. Tek Ram Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
Notice. Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, learned Additional Advocate
General and Mr. Tek Ram Sharma, learned counsel, appear and
waive service of notice on behalf of respondent No.1 and
respondent No.2, respectively and seek time to file objections/
instructions.
Objections/instructions be filed on or before the next date
of hearing. List on 01.04.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 12, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Bhawan Parkash Gaur vs. State of HP and another
Execution Petition No.70 of 2025
.
12.03.2025 Present: Mr. Aditya Chouhan, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.1/State.
Mr. Tek Ram Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
Notice. Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, learned Additional Advocate
General and Mr. Tek Ram Sharma, learned counsel, appear and
waive service of notice on behalf of respondent No.1 and
respondent No.2, respectively and seek time to file objections/
instructions.
Objections/instructions be filed on or before the next date
of hearing. List on 01.04.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 12, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Dr. Hari Krishan Thakur vs. State of HP and another
Execution Petition No.69 of 2025
.
12.03.2025 Present: Mr. Aditya Chouhan, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.1/State.
Mr. Tek Ram Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
Notice. Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, learned Additional Advocate
General and Mr. Tek Ram Sharma, learned counsel, appear and
waive service of notice on behalf of respondent No.1 and
respondent No.2, respectively and seek time to file objections/
instructions.
Objections/instructions be filed on or before the next date
of hearing. List on 01.04.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 12, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Hira Lal vs. HRTC and another
Execution Petition No.62 of 2025
.
12.03.2025 Present: Ms. Mamta Garg, Advocate, vice Mr. Vikas Rajput,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Dheeraj K. Vashisht, Advocate, for the respondents.
Notice. Mr. Dheeraj K. Vashisht, learned counsel, appears
and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents and
seeks time to file objections/ instructions.
Objections/instructions be filed on or before the next date
of hearing. List on 28.03.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 12, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Jai Singh vs. HRTC and another
Execution Petition No.1220 of 2024
.
12.03.2025 Present: Mr. Nikhil, Advocate, vice Mr. Mandeep Chandel,
Advocate, fo the petitioner.
Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate, for the respondents.
Learned counsel for the respondents seeks time to
ascertain, as to whether interest as is being claimed by the
petitioner from October, 2024 @ 9% per annum is payable. If so,
has the same been paid or not.
List on 26.03.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 12, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Gurnam Singh and others vs. Land Acquisition
Collector, HP PWD and others
CMP(M) No.1086 of 2024
.
12.03.2025 Present: Mr. O.C. Sharma, Advocate, for the applicants.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for
respondents No.1 to 3/State.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that an
appropriate application for bringing on record the legal heirs of
deceased respondent No.4 stands filed.
r However, the same is
not on record.
Registry to trace the application and place it on record well
before the next date of hearing, post removal of objection(s), if
any.
List after two weeks
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 12, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Prithvi Singh and another vs. The Principal Secretary
(Power) to the Government of H.P. and others
CMP(M) No.1527 of 2024
.
12.03.2025 Present: Mr. Ashok Kumar Tyagi, Advocate, for the
applicant/appellant.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for
respondents No.1 to 3/State.
Mr. Digvijay Singh Kanwar, Advocate, vice Mr. Yashveer
Singh Rathore, Advocate, for respondent No.4.
r to
Time for filing reply to the present application is being
sought since 27.09.2024. However, till date reply has not been
filed.
By way of indulgence, further time is given to the
respondents to do the needful. It is made clear that if no reply is
filed on or before the next date of hearing, then the right to file the
same shall stand closed without further reference to this Court.
List on 27.03.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 12, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Smt. Sapna Kumari vs. Brahmi Devi and others
CMPMO No.487 of 2024
.
12.03.2025 Present: Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate, vice Mr. Rajiv Sirkeck,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Rahil Mahajan, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Vijay Bhatia, Advocate, for respondents No.2 and 3.
Mr. Vijay Bhatia, learned Advocate has put in appearance
on behalf of respondents No.2 and 3. He seeks time to file power
of attorney.
Let the needful be done within four weeks. List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 12, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Smt. Sapna Kumari vs. Brahmi Devi and others
CMPMO No.487 of 2024
.
12.03.2025 Present: Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate, vice Mr. Rajiv Sirkeck,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Rahil Mahajan, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Vijay Bhatia, Advocate, for respondents No.2 and 3.
Mr. Vijay Bhatia, learned Advocate has put in appearance
on behalf of respondents No.2 and 3. He seeks time to file power
of attorney.
Let the needful be done within four weeks. List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 12, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Hujti Ram vs. Yogesh Kumar
CMPMO No.432 of 2024
.
12.03.2025 Present: Mr. G.D. Verma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sumit Sharma,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Anil Kapoor, Advocate, vice Mr. Nimish Gupta,
Advocate, for the respondent.
CMP No.11348 of 2024
By way of indulgence, last opportunity is afforded to the
non-applicant to file reply. Let the needful be done on or before
the next date of hearing. It is made clear that if reply is not filed
on or before the next date of hearing, then the right to file the
same shall stand closed.
List on 22.03.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 12, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
State of Himachal Pradesh and others vs. Shakuntla
Devi
.
CMPMO No.304 of 2024
12.03.2025 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
petitioners/State.
Mr. Divya Raj Singh, Advocate, vice Mr. Ramesh Sharma,
Advocate, for the respondent.
Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of the
respondent submits that the original counsel is unavailable today
on account of personal difficulty and prays for an adjournment.
Prayer not opposed. List for consideration after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 12, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Satya Devi vs. Hardev and others
RSA No.290 of 2024
.
12.03.2025 Present: Mr. Y.P. Sood, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.1, 4,
6, 7, 8(2) and 18.
Respondents No.3, 9, 11, 12, 13, 16 and 17(2) stand
served. However, there is no appearance on their behalf.
Hence, they are proceeded against ex parte.
As per report of the Registry, respondents No.8(1), 15 &
17(1) have expired. Learned counsel for the appellant seeks time
to take consequential steps for bringing on record the legal heirs
of deceased respondents No.8(1), 15 & 17(1). Let the needful be
done within four weeks.
Respondents No.2, 5(1), 19(1) & 19(2) are unserved. Let
fresh steps for their service be taken within one week. On taking
such steps, issue notice to the said respondents, returnable
within four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 12, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Baddi University Emerging Sciences & Technology vs.
M/s Chatterje Cleaning Arts Services Pvt. Ltd.
Company
.
RSA No.255 of 2024
Mr. Bhuvnesh Sharma, Senior Advocate with Ms. Vishali
12.03.2025 Present:
Lakhanpal, Advocate, for the appellant.
Interim order dated 28.10.2024 has not been complied
with qua deposit of decretal amount along-with up-to-date
interest. Further time to comply with the same was sought on
02.12.2024 and 01.01.2025. However, till date the same has not
been deposited.
In view thereof, interim order dated 28.10.2024 stands
vacated.
Fresh steps for the service of respondent have not been
taken since 01.01.2025. Let the needful be done within three
days. On taking such steps, issue notice to the respondent
returnable within four weeks.
List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 12, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Kiran Bala vs. Ram Pal and others
CMPMO No.229 of 2024
.
12.03.2025 Present: Mr. Dheeraj K. Vashisht, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Kunal Mehta, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
CMP(M) No.1810 of 2024
Reply is stated to have been filed on behalf of respondent
No.1. However, the same is not on record. Learned counsel
for the petitioner submits that copy of the reply has been received
by him. He seeks time to file rejoinder thereto. Let the needful
be done within four weeks.
It be ensured that the reply/rejoinder are placed on record
well before the next date of hearing, post removal of objection(s),
if any.
List after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 12, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Satish Kumar vs. Kamal Kishore Sharma
Civil Suit No.60 of 2024
.
12.03.2025 Present: Mr. Aditya Chouhan, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Mr. Narinder Singh Thakur, Advocate, for the defendant.
Civil Suit No.60 of 2024
Learned counsel for the plaintiff seeks time to file
replication. Let the needful be done on or before the next date of
hearing. r
List on 23.04.2025.
OMP No.771 of 2024
Rejoinder, as prayed be filed on or before the next date of
hearing.
Interim order to continue.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 12, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Parkash Chand vs. Hardyal Singh and others
CMPMO No.45 of 2024
.
12.03.2025 Present: Mr. Divya Raj Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Gaurav Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 6.
CMP No.1270 of 2024
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicants.
Order dated 16.01.2024 is made absolute.
application stands disposed of.
CMPMO No.45 of 2024
The
List for consideration on 20.03.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 12, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Subhash Chand and another vs. Sunil Kumar and
others
Civil Revision No.25 of 2024
.
12.03.2025 Present: Mr. Gurinder Singh Parmar, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Respondents No.1, 4, 9, 10 & 11 proceeded against ex
parte vide order dated 16.05.2024.
Respondent No.5 stands served on 11.09.2024.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners
submits that an appropriate application for substitution of service
of respondents No.2 and 3 stands filed. However, the same is not
on record.
Registry to trace the application and place it on record well
before the next date of hearing, post removal of objection(s), if
any.
List after two weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 12, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Davinder Kumar vs. Sukhwinder Singh
Civil Suit No.24 of 2024
.
12.03.2025 Present: Mr. Anshul Attri, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Mr. Navlesh Verma, Advocate, for the defendant.
Civil Suit No.24 of 2024 & OMP No.315 of 2024
Written statement/reply is stated to have been filed.
Learned counsel for the plaintiff/applicant submits that copies of
the same stand received by him.
r He seeks time to file
replication/rejoinder to the same.
Let the needful be done within four weeks. List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 12, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Lachhman Ram vs. Vijay Ram and others
RSA No.143 of 2023
.
12.03.2025 Present: Mr. Rohit Chaudhary, Advocate, vice Mr. Arun Sehgal,
Advocate, for the appellant, who is stated to have expired.
Mr. Malay Kaushal, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Gurdev Negi, Advocate, vice Mr. Naresh K. Sharma,
Advocate, for respondents No.2(i) to 2(v).
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that an
appropriate application for bringing on record the legal heirs of
the sole appellant stands taken. However, the same is not on
record.
Registry to trace the application and place it on record well
before the next date of hearing, post removal of objection(s), if
any.
List after two weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 12, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Ajit Singh vs. Harvinder Singh
Civil Revision No.77 of 2023
.
12.03.2025 Present: Mr. Malay Kaushal, Advocate, vice Mr. Pawanish K.
Shukla, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms. Heena Chauhan, Advocate, for the respondent.
CMP No.14812 of 2024
No reply is filed to the present application. The right to file
the same stands closed.
List for consideration on 22.03.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 12, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Savitri Devi vs. Sharif Mohammad
CMPMO No.555 of 2022
.
12.03.2025 Present: Mr. Arvind Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Surinder Saklani, Advocate, for the respondent.
Heard for sometime.
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks time to have
r to
instructions in the matter. List on 24.03.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 12, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Mohinder Singh (deceased) through LRs. and another
vs. Puran Chand (since deceased) through LRs. and
another
.
RSA No.79 of 2023
11.03.2025 Present: Mr. Ashok Chaudhary, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Sumit Raj Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.1(a)
to 1(f).
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant
seeks time to have instructions with respect to compliance of
order dated 27.11.2024, insofar as it pertains to the appellant
furnishing a security bond to the tune of Rs.1,00,000/-. Let the
needful be done within three weeks. List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 11, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Rajesh Kumar vs. Karan Singh and others
RSA No.383 of 2022
.
11.03.2025 Present: Ms. Rinki Kashmiri, Advocate, vice Mr. Janesh Gupta,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Vikas Rathore, Advocate, for respondents No.1, 2 and
3(a) to 3(c).
Mr. Manish Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for
respondent No.4/State.
weeks.
r to
Record stands received. Learned counsel for the parties
intend to go through the same. List for consideration after four
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 11, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Municipal Corporation Shimla vs. M/s Akar Enterprises
Civil Revision No.80 of 2020
.
11.03.2025 Present: Mr. Mukul Sood, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Balwant Kukreja, Advocate, for the respondent.
At the request of learned counsel for the petitioner, list on
20.03.2025.
March 11, 2025 (KS)
to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Gado Ram vs. Hemraj and others
RSA No.24 of 2020
.
11.03.2025 Present: Mr. Rajneesh K. Lal, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Basant Pal Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
None for respondents No.1, 2 and 4 to 7.
Learned counsel for the parties seek further time to go
through the record. List for admission after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 11, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Jagdish Ram and others vs. Subhash Chand and
others
RSA No.10 of 2020
.
11.03.2025 Present: Mr. Vivek Singh Attri, Advocate, for the appellants.
None for respondents No.1, 2(a) to 2(d), 3 and 5.
Mr. Manish Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for
respondent No.4/State.
CMP No.13434 of 2023
Pleadings are complete. At the request of learned counsel
for the applicants/appellants, list for consideration after three
weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 11, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Ashok Sharma vs. Kanta Bhagat
Civil Revision No.1 of 2020
.
11.03.2025 Present: Mr. Suneet Goel, Senior Advocate with Mr. Aman
Hansretta, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Vaibhav Tanwar, Advocate, for the respondent.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that power of
attorney on behalf of the petitioner shall be filed during the course
of the week.
List on 02.04.2025.
r to
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 11, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Raghubir Singh vs. Vijay Kumar and others
Civil Revision No.169 of 2017
.
11.03.2025 Present: Mr. Basant Pal Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. K.D. Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vivek Thakur,
Advocate, for respondents No.1 & 2.
Learned counsel for respondents No.1 & 2 submits that in
order to amicably settle the matter, the respondents shall make
an offer to the petitioner today itself. The petitioner may consider
the offer so made. Let the matter be listed on 22.03.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 11, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Roop Chand and another vs. Jagdish Chand and
another
.
CMPMO No.786 of 2019
11.03.2025 Present: Mr. Devender K. Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. C.N. Singh,
Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Shivom Vashista, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Arush Matlotia, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
r to
Since the matter is being listed after 08.04.2022, learned
counsel for the parties seek time to prepare the case.
List for consideration on 09.04.2025. Interim order to
continue.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 11, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Sudesh Raj vs. Pushpa Kaushal and another
CMPMO No.762 of 2019
.
11.03.2025 Present: Mr. Pawan Gautam, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Lakshay Parihar, Advocate, for the respondents.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner
submits that the petitioner has died. He seeks time to take
consequential steps for bringing on record the legal heirs of
deceased petitioner.
Let the needful be done on or before the next date of
hearing. List on 27.03.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 11, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Desh Deepak vs. The Land Acquisition Collector, HPP
CL and others
.
CMP(M) No.248 of 2025
11.03.2025 Present: Mr. Aditya Chauhan, Advocate, for the applicant/appellant.
Mr. Yashveer Singh Rathore, Advocate, for respondents
No.1 & 2.
Mr. Manish Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for
respondent No.3/State.
r to
CMP(M) No.248 of 2025
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of non-applicants.
The non-applicants have no objection, if in case, delay of 33 days
in filing the present appeal is condoned.
For the reasons stated and the explanation given in the
application, the same is allowed. Delay of 33 days in filing the
appeal, being bona fide, is condoned. The application stands
disposed of.
RFA No.______/2025 (Be registered)
Admit.
Records be called for.
List for hearing in due course.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 11, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Yan Dassi and others vs. Dolma and others
RSA No.43 of 2013
.
11.03.2025 Present: Ms. Amita Chandel, Advocate, vice Ms. Rachna Kuthiala,
Advocate, for appellants No.2 to 6.
Appellant No.1 is stated to have expired.
Mr. G.R. Palsra, Advocate, for the respondents.
CMP No.3419 of 2025
12.11.2024.
r to
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicants. Appellant No.1, namely Yan Dassi has died on
The same is evident from the Death Certificate
appended along-with present application.
The right to sue inheres/survives in the legal heirs of
deceased appellant No.1. Since the legal heirs of deceased
appellant No.1 are already on record as appellants No.2 to 6,
therefore, the present application is allowed. Name of appellant
No.1 is ordered to be deleted from the array of the parties.
Amended memo of parties appended with the present
application is ordered to be taken on record.
The application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 11, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Murari Lal vs. HRTC and another
Execution Petition No.63 of 2025
.
11.03.2025 Present: Mr. Vikas Rajput, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Dheeraj K. Vashisht, Advocate, for the respondents.
Notice. Mr. Dheeraj K. Vashisht, learned counsel, appears
and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents and
seeks time to file objections/ instructions.
Objections/instructions be filed on or before the next date
of hearing. List after two weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 11, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Bhajan Singh and others vs. State of HP and others
Execution Petition No.58 of 2025
.
11.03.2025 Present: Mr. K.S. Gill, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for
respondents No.1 to 3/State.
Notice, at this stage, confined to respondents No.1 to 3
only. Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, learned Additional Advocate General,
appears and waives service of notice on behalf of respondents
No.1 to 3 and seeks time to file objections/ instructions.
Objections/instructions be filed on or before the next date
of hearing. List after two weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 11, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Parveen Bala vs. State of HP and others
Execution Petition No.57 of 2025
.
11.03.2025 Present: Mr. K.S. Gill, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondents/State.
Notice. Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, learned Additional Advocate
General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the
respondents and seeks time to file objections/ instructions.
Objections/instructions be filed on or before the next date
of hearing. List after two weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 11, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Dinesh Pathania and another vs. State of HP and
others
Execution Petition No.43 of 2025
.
11.03.2025 Present: Mr. K.S. Gill, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for
respondents No.1 to 4/State.
Notice, at this stage, confined to respondents No.1 to 4
only. Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, learned Additional Advocate General,
appears and waives service of notice on behalf of respondents
No.1 to 4 and seeks time to file objections/ instructions.
Objections/instructions be filed on or before the next date
of hearing. List after two weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 11, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Dr. Sanjeet Sharma vs. H.P. University and others
Execution Petition No.30 of 2025
.
11.03.2025 Present: Mr. Vikrant Chandel, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms. Ranjana, Advocate, vice Ms. Archna Dutt, Advocate,
for respondents No.1 to 3.
Mr. Prashant Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.4.
Notice. Ms. Ranjana and Mr. Prashant Sharma, learned
counsel, appear and waive service of notice on behalf of
respondents No.1 to 3 and respondent No.4, respectively and
seek time to file objections/instructions.
Objections/instructions be filed on or before the next date
of hearing. List after two weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 11, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Dr. Sanjeet Sharma vs. H.P. University and others
Execution Petition No.30 of 2025
.
11.03.2025 Present: Mr. Vikrant Chandel, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms. Ranjana, Advocate, vice Ms. Archna Dutt, Advocate,
for respondents No.1 to 3.
Mr. Prashant Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.4.
Notice. Ms. Ranjana and Mr. Prashant Sharma, learned
counsel, appear and waive service of notice on behalf of
respondents No.1 to 3 and respondent No.4, respectively and
seek time to file objections/instructions.
Objections/instructions be filed on or before the next date
of hearing. List after two weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 11, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
M/s Punjab Kashmir Finance Ltd. vs. Sanjay Kumar
and others
.
CMP(M) No.781 of 2024
10.03.2025 Present: Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Munish Dhatwalia, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
As per report of the Registry, respondents No.2 and 3 are
served. However, there is no appearance on their behalf.
Hence, they are proceeded against ex parte.
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of non-applicant/
respondent No.1. The non-applicant/respondent No.1 has no
objection, if in case, delay of 01 day in filing the present petition is
condoned.
For the reasons stated and the explanation given in the
application, the same is allowed. Delay of 01 day in filing the
petition, being bona fide, is condoned. The application stands
disposed of.
Civil Revision No._____/2025 (Be registered)
At the request of learned counsel for respondent No.1, list
the matter for consideration after three weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 10, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
M/s Punjab Kashmir Finance Ltd. vs. Sanjay Kumar
and others
CMP(M) No.781 of 2024
.
10.03.2025 Present: Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Munish Dhatwalia, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
As per report of the Registry, respondents No.2 and 3 are
served. However, there is no appearance on their behalf.
respondent No.1.
Hence, they are proceeded against ex parte.
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of non-applicant/
The non-applicant/respondent No.1 has no
objection, if in case, delay of 01 day in filing the present petition is
condoned.
For the reasons stated and the explanation given in the
application, the same is allowed. Delay of 01 day in filing the
petition, being bona fide, is condoned. The application stands
disposed of.
Civil Revision No._____/2025 (Be registered)
At the request of learned counsel for respondent No.1, list
the matter for consideration after three weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 10, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Suresh Kumar vs. Meena Kumari
CMPMO No.543 of 2024
.
10.03.2025 Present: Mr. R.L. Chaudhary, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raju Ram Rahi, Advocate, for the respondent.
From perusal of the judgment of learned Additional
Sessions Judge, Hamirpur, District Hamirpur, passed in Criminal
Appeal No.23 of 2017, it is evident that two reliefs were granted.
Relief (A) is with respect to residence & Relief (B) is with respect
to grant of compensation.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that insofar as
compensation order is concerned, the same stands complied with
as Rs.20,000/- has been paid to the respondent. Insofar as relief
(A) is concerned, learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn the
attention of this Court to Paragraph-26 of the said judgment,
wherein, following has been stated:-
“He has stated being ready and willing to provide
residential/rented accommodation to the petitioner.”
In view of the aforesaid, learned counsel appearing on
behalf of the petitioner seeks time to have instructions in the
matter.
List on 27.03.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 10, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Jai Karan (deceased) through LRs. vs. Aman Kumar
CMP(M) No.1379 of 2023 and CMP(M) No.1380 of 2023
.
in RSA No.4221 of 2013
10.03.2025 Present: Mr. Naveen K. Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the applicants-
proposed legal heir of deceased appellant.
Mr. Jai Ram Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent.
CMP(M) No.1379 of 2023 and CMP(M) No.1380 of 2023
The sole appellant, in the case at hand, has died on
11.01.2018, as is evident from the Death Certificate appended
along-with the application (CMP(M) No.1379 of 2023). As per
Death Certificate, the appellant is survived by his legal heirs. The
same is in consonance with the details of the legal heirs given in
Paragraph-3 of the application (CMP(M) No.1379 of 2023).
Since the right to sue inheres/survives with the aforesaid
legal heirs of deceased sole appellant, therefore, they are
ordered to be brought on record.
For the bona fide reasons stated/sufficient cause shown in
the application, delay in bringing on record the legal heirs of sole
deceased appellant, is condoned and abatement, if any, is set
aside.
The applications stand disposed of.
RSA No.4221 of 2013
Amended memo of parties be filed within two weeks. List
thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 10, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Rajinder Singh (deceased) through LRs. and others vs.
Piar Singh and others
CMP(M) No.1209 of 2023 in RSA No.348 of 2009
.
10.03.2025 Present: Mr. Adarsh K. Vashista, Advocate, for the applicants/
appellants.
Fresh steps for the service of respondents No.10, 21, 26,
27, 33 to 35, 43, 46 to 48, 54, 55, 57 to 60 and 69 be taken within
one week. Insofar as respondent No.61 is concerned, correct
address for service of the said respondent be filed within one
week. On taking such steps, issue notice to the said
respondents, returnable within four weeks.
List after four weeks. In the meanwhile, consequential
steps for bringing on record the legal heirs of deceased
respondents No.1, 11, 12, 17, 23, 25, 32, 49, 64, 65, 67 & 73 be
also taken.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 10, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Shankri Devi (now deceased) through LR vs. Ram
Prakash and others
RSA No.268 of 2023
.
10.03.2025 Present: None for the appellant.
In the interest of justice, let fresh steps by way of filing
correct address and process fee for the purpose of service of
respondent No.2 be taken within one week. On taking such
steps, issue notice to respondent No.2, returnable within four
weeks. r
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 10, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Devinder Singh Siphehia vs. State of HP and others
a/w connected matter
RSA No.171 of 2023 a/w RSA No.172 of 2023
.
RSA No.171 of 2023
10.03.2025 Present: Mr. K.D. Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rahul Gathania,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondents No.1 to 5/State.
None for respondents No.6, 12, 17 and 18.
r to
Mr. Vishwas Kaushal, Advocate, for respondents No.7 to
10, 13, 14 and 16(a) & 16(b).
Mr. Prashant Chauhan and Mr. Hamender Singh Jaswal,
Advocates, vice Mr. Sandeep Dutta, Advocate, for
respondent No.11.
Ms. Richa Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.12.
RSA No.172 of 2023
Mr. K.D. Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rahul Gathania,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondents No.1 to 5/State.
None for respondents No.6 and 12.
Mr. Vishwas Kaushal, Advocate, for respondents No.7 to
10, 13 and 14.
Mr. Prashant Chauhan and Mr. Hamender Singh Jaswal,
Advocates, vice Mr. Sandeep Dutta, Advocate, for
respondent No.11.
Ms. Richa Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.12.
CMP No.9711 of 2024 in RSA No.171 of 2023
The present application has become infructuous, as in
terms of order dated 30.08.2024, post admission the notices have
been accepted on behalf of respondents No.1 to 15 by their
respective counsels. The application stands disposed of.
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
CMP No.9309 of 2023 in RSA No.171 of 2023
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
.
appellant/applicant seeks time to have instructions as to whether
anything survives in the present application.
List on 03.04.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 10, 2025 (KS) Judge
r to
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Kimtu Devi vs. State of HP and others
Civil Suit No.10 of 2023
.
10.03.2025 Present: Ms. Neha Negi, Advocate, vice Mr. Ajay Kumar Dhiman,
Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
defendants No.1 to 3/State.
Ms. Komal Chaudhary, Advocate, for defendants No.4 & 5.
Ms. Amita Chandel, Advocate, vice Ms. Rachna Kuthiala,
Advocate, for the applicant in OMP No.1073 of 2023.
OMP No.1073 of 2024
Further time prayed for filing reply on behalf of the non-
applicants. Let the needful be done within four weeks. List
thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 10, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
G.M. Northern Railways vs. Ama rChand (deceased)
through LRs. and others
RFA No.8 of 2023
.
10.03.2025 Present: Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Senior Panel Counsel, for the
appellant.
Mr. Manoj Brakta, Advocate, vice Mr. Atharv Sharma,
Advocate, for respondents No.1(a), to 1(g), 3 to 12.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondents No.13 & 14/State.
r to
Amended memo of parties filed, which is at Page-52 of the
paper book, is ordered to be taken on record.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 10, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Madhubala vs. Shashi
CMPMO No.86 of 2022
.
10.03.2025 Present: Mr. M.A. Safee, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Raj Kumar Negi,
Advocate, for the respondent.
Time for filing reply and power of attorney is being sought
since 04.05.2022. However, till date neither reply nor power of
attorney has been filed.
By way of indulgence, three weeks further time is given to
the respondent to do the needful. It is made clear that if no reply
is filed on the next date of hearing, then the right to file the same
shall stand closed without further renfence to this Court.
List on 26.03.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 10, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Shakuntla Shashi and others vs. Shabnam Sood, a/w
connected matters
.
Civil Revision No.58 of 2017 a/w Civil
Revision Nos.59 & 60 of 2017
Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Balwant Kukreja,
10.03.2025 Present:
Advocate, for the petitioner(s).
Mr. Deepak Bhasin, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sambhav
Bhasin, Advocate, for the respondent(s).
CMP(M) No.2113 of 2024 in Civil Revision No.60/2017
Pleadings in the applications are complete.
During the pendency of the present proceedings, the sole
petitioner is stated to have died. In response to the application
for bringing on record the legal heirs of deceased sole
petitioner/applicant, non-applicant contends that the tenancy, in
the case at hand, could not have devolved upon the legal heirs
sought to be brought on record. The question, as to whether the
tenancy has devolved or as to whether the legal heirs are
required to be brought on record only for the purpose of
representing the estate is the question which can be decided at
the final stage.
In view of the aforesaid, this application shall be
adjudicated finally at the time of hearing of the main petition.
Civil Revision Nos.58 & 59 of 2017
List on 22.04.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 10, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Pavinder Kumar vs. Jagdish Singh and others
RSA No.101 of 2012
.
10.03.2025 Present: Ms. Shrutika Chauhan, Advocate, vice Mr. Dheeraj K.
Vashisht, Advocate, for the appellant.
Respondent No.1 is stated to have expired.
Ms. Amita Chandel, Advocate, vice Ms. Rachna Kuthiala,
Advocate, for respondents No.2 to 4.
None for respondents No.5 to 18.
Names of respondents No.19 and 21 stand deleted.
Respondents No.20 and 22 are stated to have expired.
CMP(M) Nos.1949 & 1950 of 2024
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the
proposed LRs of deceased respondent No.1, detailed in
paragraph-2 of the application (CMP(M) No.1949/2024),
returnable within four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 10, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Mohinder Singh and others vs. Kashmiri Devi and
others
RSA No.273 of 2010
.
10.03.2025 Present: Mr. Vijay Panchta, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Pranjal Munjal, Advocate, vice Mr. Janesh Gupta,
Advocate, for respondents No.1, 3 to 6.
Ms. Neha Negi, Advocate vice Mr. Ajay Kumar Dhiman,
Advocate, for respondents No.5(a) to 5(d), respondent
No.7 and proposed LRs. of respondent No.8, except LR
No.8(c), namely Rakesh Chand.
CMP(M) Nos.536 & 537 of 2020
Time for bringing on record the legal heirs of deceased LR
No.8(c) is being sought since 19.09.2024. Further time is sought
by learned counsel (Mr. Ajay Kumar Dhiman, Advocate) for filing
power of attorney on behalf of LRs.No.8(a), 8(b) and 8(d) to 8(h).
CMP(M) No.1421 & 1422 of 2024
Respondents No.2(a) and 2(b) are served. However,
there is no appearance on their behalf. Hence, they are
proceeded against ex parte.
CMP(M) No.1419 & 1420 of 2024
Respondent No.9(b) is served. However, there is no
appearance on his behalf. Hence, he is proceeded against ex
parte.
Insofar as respondent No.9(a) is concerned, it is reported
that he could not be served as his correct name is Rajesh Kumar
instead of Rajender Kumar.
Let fresh steps for the service of respondent No.9(a)-
Rajesh Kumar be taken within three days. On taking such steps,
issue notice to the said respondent, returnable within four weeks.
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Amended memo of parties in the present applications be
filed by stating the correct parentage of respondents No.9(c) to
.
9(e). The present applications would be dealt with once
respondent No.9(a) is served.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 10, 2025 (KS) Judge
r to
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Suresh Kumar vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Cr.MP(M) No.448 of 2025
.
10.03.2025 Present: Mr. Yashveer Singh Rathore, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
Notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate
General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the
file status report.
r to
respondent-State. He prays for and is granted four weeks’ time to
List on 11.04.2025, on which date, respondent/State shall
file Status report.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 10, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Pavnesh Kumar vs. Navneet Sharma and others
RSA No.32 of 2025
.
10.03.2025 Present: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Jaswal, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Rajesh Mandhotra, Advocate, for respondent No.10.
Learned counsel for respondent No.10 seeks time to file
power of attorney.
stage.
r to
List after one week for consideration at the admission
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 10, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Pyare Chand vs. State of H.P. and others
RSA No.33 of 2025
.
10.03.2025 Present: Mr. Kunal Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. Sudhir Bhatnagar,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondents/State.
At the request of learned counsel appearing on behalf of
the appellant, list for consideration after one week.
March 10, 2025 (KS)
to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
LAC & Anr. Vs. Rajmal & Ors..
.
CMP(M) No.1098 of 2024
07.03.2025 Present: Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for
applicants/State.
Mr. Abhinav Purohit, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 3,
7, 8 and 10.
CMP(M) No.1098 of 2024
Addl.
Reply on behalf of the contesting respondents, be filed, on
or before the next date of hearing.
Learned Advocate General submits that an
appropriate application for bringing on record the LRs of
deceased respondent No.9 has already been filed in the Registry
of this Court. However, the same is not on record.
Registry to trace the application and place it on record well
before the next date of hearing, post removal of objection(s), if
any.
List after four weeks.
CMP(M) Nos.228 and 229 of 2025
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the
proposed LRs of deceased respondent No.4, returnable within
four weeks.
CMP(M) Nos.230 and 231 of 2025
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the
proposed LRs of deceased respondent No.5, returnable within
four weeks.
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
CMP(M) Nos.232 and 233 of 2025
.
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the
proposed LRs of deceased respondent No.6, returnable within
four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 07, 2025 (KS) Judge
r to
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:41 :::CIS
Rajinder Kaur and another vs. Ravinder Parkash and
others
CMP(M) No.1080 of 2024 in
.
RSA No.252 of 2023
07.03.2025 Present: Mr. Atharv Sharma, Advocate, for the
applicants/appellants.
Mr. Paras Dhaulta, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 6.
None for respondent No.7.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for
respondents No.8 & 9/State
At the pleasure of Hon’ble the Chief Justice, list before
another appropriate Bench.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 07, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
LAC and another vs. Ram Swaroop & others
CMP No.381 of 2025 in RFA No.364
of 2004
.
07.03.2025 Present: Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
non-applicants/appellants-State.
Mr. Vijay Sharma, Advocate, for the respondents.
In order to enable the Addl. Advocate General for the non-
applicants/appellants to have instructions, list on 12.03.2024.
r ( Bipin C. Negi )
March 07, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Jeet Singh vs. Avinash
Civil Revision No.121 of 2024
.
07.03.2025 Present: Mr. Devender Kumar Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. G.R. Palsra, Advocate, for the respondent.
CMP No.26274 of 2024
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicant. Non-applicant submits that the total disputed amount,
in the case at hand, is Rs.50,000/-(Rupees fifty thousand) only.
As per the averments made in the petition, a sum of
Rs.3,50,000/- (Rupees three lacs and fifty thousand) has been
deposited with the Rent Controller, Mandi on 25.08.2023. Since,
admittedly the amount in dispute is only Rs.50,000/-(Rupees fifty
thousand), therefore, the Rent Controller, Mandi is directed to
release Rs.3,00,000/- (Rupees three lacs) along with
proportionate interest accrued thereupon to the present applicant.
The amount be remitted to the bank account, details whereof,
have been given in Paragraph-3 of the present application,
subject to proper verification. The application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 07, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Jeet Singh vs. Avinash
Civil Revision No.121 of 2024
.
07.03.2025 Present: Mr. Devender Kumar Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. G.R. Palsra, Advocate, for the respondent.
CMP No.26274 of 2024
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicant. Non-applicant submits that the total disputed amount,
in the case at hand, is Rs.50,000/-(Rupees fifty thousand) only.
As per the averments made in the petition, a sum of
Rs.3,50,000/- (Rupees three lacs and fifty thousand) has been
deposited with the Rent Controller, Mandi on 25.08.2023. Since,
admittedly the amount in dispute is only Rs.50,000/-(Rupees fifty
thousand), therefore, the Rent Controller, Mandi is directed to
release Rs.3,00,000/- (Rupees three lacs) along with
proportionate interest accrued thereupon to the present applicant.
The amount be remitted to the bank account, details whereof,
have been given in Paragraph-3 of the present application,
subject to proper verification. The application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 07, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Rajan Gupta and others vs. Sudhir Singh and others
RSA No.363 of 2022
.
07.03.2025 Present: Mr. Karun Negi, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Parikshit Sharma, Advocate, for the respondents.
CMP No.8152 of 2024
Pleadings are complete.
RSA No.363 of 2022
Record stands received. Learned counsel for the parties
intend to go through the same. List for consideration after three
weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 07, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Sudan Singh vs. HRTC and others
Execution Petition No.1400 of 2024
.
07.03.2025 Present: Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate, for the respondents.
Notice. Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate, appears and
waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents and seeks
time to file reply.
Reply/instructions on behalf of the respondents be filed on
or before the next date of hearing. List on 02.04.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 07, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Nand Lal vs. HRTC and others
Execution Petition No.1397 of 2024
.
07.03.2025 Present: Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate, for the respondents.
Notice. Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate, appears and
waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents and seeks
time to file reply.
Reply/instructions on behalf of the respondents be filed on
or before the next date of hearing. List on 02.04.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 07, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Sudershan Kumar vs. HRTC and others
Execution Petition No.1396 of 2024
.
07.03.2025 Present: Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Vinod Kumar Gupta, Advocate, for the respondents.
Notice. Mr. Vinod Kumar Gupta, Advocate, appears and
waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents and seeks
time to file reply.
Reply/instructions on behalf of the respondents be filed on
or before the next date of hearing. List on 02.04.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 07, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Rajvinder Singh vs. HRTC and another
Execution Petition No.1389 of 2024
.
07.03.2025 Present: Mr. Hemant Kumar Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Vinod Kumar Gupta, Advocate, for the respondents.
Notice. Mr. Vinod Kumar Gupta, Advocate, appears and
waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents and seeks
time to file reply.
Reply/instructions on behalf of the respondents be filed on
or before the next date of hearing. List on 02.04.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 07, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Surjeet Singh(deceased) thorough his LRs. vs. Land
Acquisition-cum- Competent Authority and another
Arbitration Case No.735 of 2024
.
07.03.2025 Present: Mr. Gurdev Negi, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.1/State.
Ms. Sneh Bhimta, Advocate, vice Ms. Shreya Chauhan,
Advocate, for respondent No.2.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.2
submits that reply stands filed. However, the same is not on
record. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he has
received copy of the same. Learned counsel for the petitioners
submits that no rejoinder is required to be filed.
Registry to trace the reply and place it on record well
before the next date of hearing, post removal of objection(s), if
any.
List the matter on 10.04.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 07, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Kapil Kumar & Anr. vs. Babita Devi
CMPMO No.472 of 2024
.
07.03.2025 Present: Mr. Azad Kaith, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he would
be depositing a sum of Rs.30,000/- towards the arrears of
maintenance today in the Registry of this Court. The
maintenance, in the case at hand, is payable from 12.10.2022 @
Rs.8,000/- per month.
r Learned counsel for the petitioners
submits that the balance arrears would be deposited on or before
the next date of hearing.
Besides the aforesaid, learned counsel for the petitioners
seeks time to prepare the case at hand. List after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 07, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Pooja Verma and others vs. Lalit Mohan and others
RSA No.300 of 2024
.
07.03.2025 Present: Ms. Sneh Bhimta, Advocate, for the applicant/appellant.
None for respondent No.1. though duly served.
Fresh steps for the service of respondents No.2 to 4 be
taken within three weeks. On taking such steps, issue notice to
the said respondents, returnable within four weeks.
List after four weeks. In the meanwhile, certified copy of
the trial Court judgment be placed on record.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 07, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
National Highway Authority of India vs. Anantu and
another
OMP(M) No.148 of 2024
.
07.03.2025 Present: Ms. Sneh Bhimta, Advocate, for the applicant/appellant.
Further time prayed for bringing on record the legal heirs
deceased respondents No.1 and 2. Let the needful be done
within three weeks. List thereafter.
March 07, 2025 (KS)
to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Border Road Organization vs. Hoshiar Singh (since
deceased) through LRs. and others
RFA No.13 of 2024
.
07.03.2025 Present: Mr. Nand Lal Thakur, Senior Panel Counsel, for the
appellant.
Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.1(a).
Mr. Rahul, Advocate, for respondent No.1(b).
Mr. Jai Dev Thakur, Advocate, for respondents No.2 & 3.
r to
CMP Nos.9909 & 19165 of 2024
These applications have been filed under Order 41 Rule
33 of the Civil Procedure Code. The same are to be heard along-
with the main appeal at the time of final hearing. Hence,
pleadings be completed in the meanwhile.
RFA No.13 of 2024
List for hearing in due course.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 07, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Rajinder Kaur and another vs. Ravinder Parkash and
others
RSA No.252 of 2023
.
07.03.2025 Present: Mr. Atharv Sharma, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Paras Dhaulta, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 6.
None for respondent No.7.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for
respondents No.8 & 9/State
r to
At the pleasure of Hon’ble the Chief Justice, list before
another appropriate Bench.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 07, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Julfi Ram vs. Dharam Singh
RSA No.135 of 2023
.
07.03.2025 Present: Mr. Pawan Gautam, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Atharv Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that in
pursuance to order dated 13.12.2024, mesne profit @ Rs.3,000/-,
as was decided vide order dated 12.09.2023, has been deposited
by the appellant till March, 2025.
r In terms of order dated
12.09.2023, the appellant was required to deposit a sum of
Rs.3,000/- per month. Learned counsel for the appellant assures
this Court that regular payments shall be deposited every month
during the pendency of this appeal.
The matter was admitted vide order dated 01.12.2023. In
view thereof, list the matter for hearing in due course.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 07, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
State of HP and others vs. Sachin Kumar
CMP(M) No.1836 of 2024
.
06.03.2025 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
applicants/appellants-State.
Respondent though served, but there is no appearance on
his behalf. Hence, he is proceeded against ex parte.
In the filing of the present appeal, there is a delay of about
122 days. The same has been duly explained in the application
filed for condonation of delay. Even otherwise, while dealing with
an application for condonation of delay filed by the State, one has
to be conscious of the bureaucratic delays, impersonal nature of
the governmental functioning, institutional interest and hence a
justice oriented liberal approach has to be taken while dealing
with such applications.
In this respect, it would be appropriate to refer to decision
of the Hon’ble Apex Court passed in State of Manipur and
others vs. Koting Lamkang, 2019 (10) SCC 408. The relevant
extract of the same is being reproduced herein below:-
“7. But while concluding as above, it was necessary
for the Court to also be conscious of the
bureaucratic delay and the slow pace in reaching a
government decision and the routine way of deciding
whether the State should prefer an appeal against a
judgment adverse to it. Even while observing that
the law of limitation would harshly affect the party,
the Court felt that the delay in the appeal filed by the
State, should not be condoned.
8. Regard should be had in similar such
circumstances to the impersonal nature of the
Government’s functioning where individual officers
may fail to act responsibly. This in turn, would result
in injustice to the institutional interest of the State. If::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
the appeal filed by State are lost for individual
default, those who are at fault, will not usually be
individually affected.”
.
Other than the aforesaid, it would also be appropriate
to refer to judgment dated 09.10.2023, passed in Civil
Appeal No.5867 of 2015 titled Sheo Raj Singh (deceased)
through LRs. and others vs. Union of India and another. The
relevant extract of the same is being reproduced herein
below:-. r
“37. Having bestowed serious consideration to the rival
contentions, we feel that the High Court’s decision to
condone the delay on account of the first respondent’s
inability to present the appeal within time, for the
reasons assigned therein, does not suffer from any
error warranting interference. As the aforementioned
judgments have shown, such an exercise of discretion
does, at times, call for a liberal and justice- oriented
approach by the Courts, where certain leeway could be
provided to the State. The hidden forces that are at
work in preventing an appeal by the State being
presented within the prescribed period of limitation so
as not to allow a higher court to pronounce upon the
legality and validity of an order of a lower court and
thereby secure unholy gains, can hardly be ignored.
Impediments in the working of the grand scheme of
governmental functions have to be removed by taking
a pragmatic view on balancing of the competing
interests.”
Hence, for the reasons/sufficient cause stated in the
application & the aforesaid position of law, delay in filing the
present appeal is condoned. Application stands disposed of.
RSA No.______/2025
Be registered
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
List for admission after two weeks.
.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
r to
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
HPPCL and another vs. Luxmi Kant and others
RFA No.392 of 2018 a/w Cross
Objection No.11 of 2019
.
06.03.2025 Present: Ms. Himani Verma, Proxy Counsel, for the appellants.
Ms. Shruti, Proxy Counsel, for respondents No.1 to 9, 11,
12(a) to 12(g), 13(a) to 13(c), 14(a), 14(b), 15, 16, 17(a) to
17(i).
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondents No.18 & 19/State.
CMP No.22555 of 2024
r to
Vide order dated 29.11.2018, award dated 05.09.2018,
passed by learned District Judge, Sirmaur District at Nahan, H.P.,
in LAC Petition No.40-LAC/4 of 2015, titled as Luxmi Kant and
others vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & others, had been stayed
subject to deposit of the entire awarded amount alongwith up-to-
date interest in the Registry of this Court.
Since the aforesaid amount has not been deposited,
therefore, the respondents are free to execute the order. The
application stands disposed of.
RFA No.392 of 2018
List after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
HPPCL and another vs. Sadanand and others
RFA No.386 of 2018 a/w Cross
Objection No.12 of 2019
.
06.03.2025 Present: Ms. Himani Verma, Proxy Counsel, for the appellants.
Ms. Shruti, Proxy Counsel, for respondents No.1 and 2.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondents No.3 & 4/State.
CMP No.22583 of 2024
Vide order dated 29.11.2018, award dated 05.09.2018,
passed by learned District Judge, Sirmaur District at Nahan, H.P.,
in LAC Petition No.33-LAC/4 of 2015, titled as Sadanand and
others vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & others, had been stayed
subject to deposit of the entire awarded amount alongwith up-to-
date interest in the Registry of this Court.
Since the aforesaid amount has not been deposited,
therefore, the respondents are free to execute the order. The
application stands disposed of.
RFA No.386 of 2018
List after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
HPPCL and another vs. Rajinder Singh and others
RFA No.385 of 2018 a/w Cross
Objection No.16 of 2019
.
06.03.2025 Present: Ms. Himani Verma, Proxy Counsel, for the appellants.
Ms. Shruti, Proxy Counsel, for respondents No.1 to 8, 9(i)
to 9(iv) and 10 to 14.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondents No.15 & 16/State.
CMP No.22585 of 2024
Vide order dated 29.11.2018, award dated 05.09.2018,
passed by learned District Judge, Sirmaur District at Nahan, H.P.,
in LAC Petition No.32-LAC/4 of 2015, titled as Shri Rajinder
Singh vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & others, had been stayed
subject to deposit of the entire awarded amount alongwith up-to-
date interest in the Registry of this Court.
Since the aforesaid amount has not been deposited,
therefore, the respondents are free to execute the order. The
application stands disposed of.
RFA No.385 of 2018
List after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
HPPCL and another vs. Narayan Singh and others
RFA No.391 of 2018 a/w Cross
Objection No.22 of 2019
.
06.03.2025 Present: Ms. Himani Verma, Proxy Counsel, for the appellants.
Ms. Shruti, Proxy Counsel, for respondent No.1.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondents No.2 & 3/State.
CMP No.22586 of 2024
Vide order dated 29.11.2018, award dated 05.09.2018,
passed by learned District Judge, Sirmaur District at Nahan, H.P.,
in LAC Petition No.39-LAC/4 of 2015, titled as Shri Narayan
Singh vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & others, had been stayed
subject to deposit of the entire awarded amount alongwith up-to-
date interest in the Registry of this Court.
Since the aforesaid amount has not been deposited,
therefore, the respondents are free to execute the order. The
application stands disposed of.
RFA No.391 of 2018
List after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
HPPCL and another vs. Kaku Ram and others
RFA No.389 of 2018 a/w Cross
Objection No.13 of 2019
.
06.03.2025 Present: Ms. Himani Verma, Proxy Counsel, for the appellants.
Ms. Shruti, Proxy Counsel, for respondents No.1 to 5.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondents No.6 & 7/State.
CMP No.22587 of 2024
Vide order dated 29.11.2018, award dated 05.09.2018,
passed by learned District Judge, Sirmaur District at Nahan, H.P.,
in LAC Petition No.37-LAC/4 of 2015, titled as Kaku Ram &
others vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & others, had been stayed
subject to deposit of the entire awarded amount alongwith up-to-
date interest in the Registry of this Court.
Since the aforesaid amount has not been deposited,
therefore, the respondents are free to execute the order. The
application stands disposed of.
RFA No.389 of 2018
List after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
.
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Rajinder Kumar and another vs. Madan Gopal
CMP(M) No.1805 of 2024 in
.
RSA No.311 of 2008
06.03.2025 Present: Ms. Himani Verma, Proxy Counsel, for the non-applicants/
appellants.
Ms. Shruti, Proxy Counsel, for the respondent.
Time to file reply is being sought since 20.11.2024. Reply
be positively filed on or before the next date of hearing. List after
four weeks. r
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Ram Rattan vs. Land Acquisition Collector, HPPWD
CMP(M) No.1083 of 2024
.
06.03.2025 Present: Ms. Himani Verma, Proxy Counsel, for the applicant/
appellant.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondents/State.
CMP(M) No.1083 of 2024
From the reasons and sufficient cause shown in the
application, it is evident that there exists sufficient cause/
explanation for condoning the delay in filing the present appeal.
The application is allowed. Delay of 73 days in filing the present
appeal is condoned.
The appeal be registered. The application stands
disposed of.
RFA No.________/2025
Admit.
Records be called for.
List for hearing in due course.
CMP No.26376 of 2024
The impugned award, in the case at hand, was passed by
learned Additional District Judge, Nalagarh, District Solan, on
14.12.2023. Prior to passing of the said order, on 04.09.2023,
proforma respondent No.4-Smt. Parwati Devi had expired, as is
evident from the Death Certificate appended along-with the
present application at Annexure A-1. The deceased proforma
respondent No.4-Smt. Parwati Devi had executed a registered
Will bearing No.85 of 2010 dated 17.03.2010. By virtue of the
said Will, the entire movable and immovabale properties of
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
deceased proforma respondent No.4-Smt. Parwati Devi have
.
been bequeathed in favour of the present applicant/appellant.
In view of the aforesaid, since the present applicant is the
sole legal representative of the deceased proforma respondent
No.4-Smt. Parwati Devi, therefore, the present application is
allowed. The name of deceased proforma respondent No.4-Smt.
Parwati Devi is ordered to be deleted from the array of the
respondent as her sole legal representative, based on a
registered Will, is already on record as applicant/appellant.
The application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Richa Sipahiya/Katoch vs. Rahul Katoch
CMPMO No.522 of 2024
.
06.03.2025 Present: Ms. Himani Verma, Proxy Counsel, for the petitioner.
Ms. Shruti, Proxy Counsel, for the respondent.
At the joint request of learned counsel for the parties, list
on 18.03.2025.
March 06, 2025 (KS)
to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Ashwani Kumar and others vs. Vidya Devi
RSA No.46 of 2024
.
06.03.2025 Present: Ms. Himani Verma, Proxy Counsel, for the appellants.
Ms. Shruti, Proxy Counsel, for the respondent.
CMP No.4347 of 2024
No reply has been filed despite last opportunity having
been granted.
On the persuasive request of learned counsel
appearing on behalf of the non-applicants, further three weeks’
time is granted to file the same, subject to payment of cost
quantified at Rs.2,500/- to be deposited with Himachal Pradesh
High Court Bar Association, Shimla.
List after three weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
State of HP and another vs. Babu Ram Gupta
(deceased) through LRs. and others
.
CMP(M) No.245 of 2024
06.03.2025 Present: Mr. R.S. Verma, Additional Advocate General, for the
applicants/ appellants-State.
Appropriate application, in terms of previous order, be filed
on or before the next date of hearing. List after three weeks.
March 06, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Rikhi Ram vs. Himachal Pradesh State Electricity
Board and others
.
CMPMO No.593 of 2024
01.03.2025 Present: Mr. K.D. Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rahul Gathania,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms. Sunita Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Dhananjay
Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.1 and 2.
Vide impugned order dated 22.08.2024, learned Additional
District Judge-I, Una, District Una, has dismissed an application
filed under Order 22 Rule 4 read with Section 151 of the Civil
Procedure Code for bringing on record the legal heirs of
deceased respondent No.4, i.e., Basant Lal and respondent No.7,
i.e., Bahadur Devi @ Shobha Devi. The reason for rejection of
the same being that the aforesaid two respondents had died while
SLP was pending adjudication before the Hon’ble Apex Court.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that an
appropriate application has been filed before the Hon’ble Apex
Court for bringing on record the legal heirs of deceased
respondents No.4 and 7.
In view of the aforesaid, list the matter in the 4th week of
April, 2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 01, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
General Manager, Northern Railway vs. Balbir Singh
(deceased) through LRs. And another a/w connected
matters.
.
RFA No.61 of 2021 a/w RFA Nos.60 & 62 of 2022
RFA No.61 of 2021 a/w RFA No.60 of 2022
01.03.2025 Present: Mr. Shashi Shirshoo, Central Government Counsel, for the
appellant, in both the appeals.
Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Atharv
Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.1(a) to 1(d), in both
the appeals.
Mr. R.S. Verma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.2/State, in both the appeals.
RFA No.62 of 2022
Mr. R.S. Verma, Additional Advocate General, for the
appellants/State.
Mr. R.K. Sharma, Senior Advocate with Ms. Anita Devi,
Advocate, for respondents No.1(a) to 1(c) though
proceeded against ex parte vide order dated 03.08.2022.
CMP No.4991 of 2024 in RFA No.61 of 2021
At the joint request of learend counsel for the parties, list
on 22.03.2025.
CMP(M) No.1259 of 2021 in RFA No.62 of 2022
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicants.
The sole respondent is stated to have expired on
11.04.2021. The same is evident from the Death Certificate
appended along with the present application as Annexure A-I. He
is survived by his legal heirs details, whereof, have been given in
Annexure A-II. The same is in consonance with the details of the
legal heirs given in Paragraph-5 of the application.
Since the right to sue inheres/survives with the aforesaid
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
legal heirs of deceased sole respondent, therefore, they are
.
ordered to be brought on record.
For the bona fide reasons stated/sufficient cause shown in
the application, delay in bringing on record the legal heirs of sole
deceased respondent, is condoned and abatement, if any, is set
aside. Application stands disposed of.
Amended memo of parties filed with the applications is
taken on record.
Mr. R.K. Sharma, learned Senior Advocate assisted by
Ms. Anita Devi, learned Advocate has put in appearance on
behalf of legal heirs of deceased sole respondent and submits
that power of attorney on their behalf stands already filed.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 01, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
.
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Nirmala Devi vs. Om Parkash
RSA No.142 of 2020
.
01.03.2025 Present: Mr. Divya Raj Singh, Advocate, for the appellant.
Sole respondent is stated to have expired.
Steps for the service of legal heris of deceased respondent
have not been taken since 12.12.2024.
Let the needful be done within three days. On taking such
steps, issue notice to the legal heirs, returnable within four weeks.
It is made clear that if steps are not taken within the aforesaid
period, present appeal shall automatically stand dismissed for
non prosecution without further reference to this Court.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 01, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Puran Chand and others vs. Ambi Chand and others
CMPMO No.24 of 2020
.
01.03.2025 Present: Mr. Parveen Chauhan, Advocate, vice Mr. Y.P. Sood,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
None for the respondents.
Despite being served, power of attorney on behalf of
respondents No.1 to 3 has not been filed till date. Since, in the
case at hand, proceedings before the trial Court have already
been stayed vide order dated 06.01.2020, therefore, list the
matter for consideration on 17.03.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 01, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
G.M. Northern Railway vs. Virender Singh and others
CMP(M) No.1425 of 2019
.
01.03.2025 Present: Mr. Shashi Shirshoo, Senior Panel Counsel, for the
applicant/appellant.
Time for bringing on record the legal heirs of deceased
respondents No.5, 7, 8 and 10 is being taken since 09.05.2024.
However, requisite steps have not been taken till date.
Since within the prescribed period of limitation, appropriate
steps have not been taken for bringing on record the legal heirs of
deceased respondents No.5, 7, 8 and 10, therefore, necessary
consequences with respect to abatement have ensued.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 01, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Sarla Gupta vs. Nar Singh Dass Gupta and others
RSA No.493 of 2014
.
01.03.2025 Present: Mr. Romesh Verma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sumit
Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Respondent No.1 is stated to have expired.
Respondents No.2 to 4 & 5(a) to 5(d) already ex parte.
CMP(M) No.183 of 2025
On taking steps within a week, issue notice to the legal
heirs of deceased respondent No.1, details whereof have been
given in Paragraph-2 of the application, returnable within four
weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 01, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Nirmala Devi (deceased) through LRs. vs. The
Commissioner and others a/w connected matters
RSA No.76 of 2013 a/w
.
RSA Nos.105 and 126 of 2013
01.03.2025 Present: Mr. Sumit Sharma, Advocate, for the appellants, in all the
appeals.
Mr. Dilip Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Manish
Sharma, Advocate, for the respondents, in all the appeals.
Mr. Vishal Verma, Advocate, for the applicants in CMP
No.10028 of 2022.
CMP(M) No.1300 of 2022
At the request of learend Senior Advocate appearing on
behalf of the non-applicant(s), list on 03.03.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 01, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Tarsem Singh and others vs. Ramesh Chand and
others
RSA No.706 of 2008 a/w
.
Cross Objection No.67 of 2009
01.03.2025 Present: Mr. Divya Raj Singh, Advocate, for the appellants/non-
cross objector.
Mr. Abhishek, Advocate vice Ms. Rachna Kuthiala,
Advocate, for respondents No. 1, 2, 4(a) to 4(c), 5 to
8/cross-objectors.
None for respondents No. 3(a) and 3(b), 9 to 13 and 15 to
21.
Respondent No. 14 is stated to have expired.
Names of respondents No. 22, 25 to 27 stand deleted.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants
seeks time to take consequential steps in pursuance to the death
of respondent No.14. Let the needful be done within one week.
In the meanwhile, amended memo of parties be filed. List
thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 01, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Om Parkash vs. Rajinder Kumar and others
RFA No.365 of 2000
.
01.03.2025 Present: Mr. Viplav Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Anirudh
Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Vedhant Ranta, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Malay Kaushal, Advocate, vice Mr. Manohar Lal
Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.8.
Ms. Dhanwanti, Advocate, vice Mr. Sanjay Bhardwaj,
Advocate, for respondent No.9.
RFA No.365 of 2000
r to
Mr. Abhinav Ghabroo, Advocate, for respondent No.10.
The factum of respondents No.8 and 10 having attained
majority has been dealt with in order dated 01.05.2012, while
deciding CMP No.523 of 2012. The same has been noticed and
respondents No.8 & 10 have been permitted to sue in their own
capacity after attaining the age of majority. Learned counsel
appearing on behalf of respondents No.8 & 10 seek four weeks’
time to file power of attorney. Let the needful be done on or
before 07.04.2025.
CMP Nos.4659/2018 & 18391/2022
Pleadings be completed before the next date of hearing.
Since these applications are filed under Order 41 Rule 27 of the
Civil Procedure Code, they shall be heard at the time of final
hearing of the appeal.
CMP No.18393 of 2022
Allowed and the applicant is exempted from filing
translated copies of the Hindi documents, in question, annexed
with the accompanying appeal, at this stage, subject to filing of
the same within seven days, as and when directed to do so.
The application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 01, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Thakur Dass vs. Kalavati and others
RSA No.17 of 2025
.
01.03.2025 Present: Mr. G.D. Verma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sumit Sharma,
Advocate, for the appellant.
RSA No.17 of 2025
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the
respondents, returnable within four weeks. Notice is being issued
on substantial question of law No.5 framed at Page 22 of the
paper book. r
CMP No.2909 of 2025
During the pendency of the present appeal, operation and
execution of judgment and decree dated 27.12.2024, passed by
learned District Judge (Forests), Shimla, in Civil Appeal
No.5/2023, shall remain stayed.
The application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 01, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Thakur Dass vs. Kalavati and others
RSA No.16 of 2025
.
01.03.2025 Present: Mr. G.D. Verma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sumit Sharma,
Advocate, for the appellant.
RSA No.16 of 2025
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the
respondents, returnable within four weeks. Notice is being issued
on substantial question of law No.5 framed at Page 22 of the
paper book. r
CMP No.2904 of 2025
During the pendency of the present appeal, operation and
execution of judgment and decree dated 27.12.2024, passed by
learned District Judge (Forests), Shimla, in Civil Appeal
No.53/2023, shall remain stayed.
The application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
March 01, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Jal Pal & Another vs. Krishan Singh
RSA No.180 of 2022
.
28.02.2025 Present: Mr. Prashant Chauhan, Advocate, vice Mr. Sarthak Mehta,
Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Ashok Kumar Verma, Advocate, vice Mr. Rakesh
Chauhan, Advocate, for the respondent.
Further time prayed for by leanred counsel for the parties
to go through the record.
r to
List after three weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
February 28, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Renuka Ji Dam Project and another vs. Chanjali and
another
CMP No.26212 of 2024 in
RFA No.38 of 2019
.
28.02.2025 Present: Mr. Shashi Shirshoo, Advocate, for the appellants.
None for respondent No.1.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.2/State/applicant.
CMP No.26212 of 2024
One Shri Ram Krishan (complainant) has leveled serious
allegations against the alleged accused, Advocate Prittam Singh
Kanwar and others. On the basis of the aforesaid allegations,
FIR No.16 of 2022 dated 21.02.2022 under Sections 409, 467,
468, 471, 420, 120-B of the Indian Penal Code has been
registered at Police Station, Renukaji, District Sirmaur. The said
FIR was registered on the basis of an order passed by learned
Judicial Magistrate First Class, Nahan vide order dated
17.02.2022. As per the allegations in the FIR, a sum of
Rs.18,00,000/- to be received by Smt. Chanjali Devi on account
of acquisition of land has been fraudulent withdrawn by the
aforesaid Advocate.
During investigation, Advocate Prittam Singh Kanwar has
produced photocopy of the Vakalatnama granted in his favour by
Smt. Chanjali Devi alleged to contain her thumb impression.
The Vakalatnama lying in the case file (RFA No.38 of
2019), filed on behalf of Smt. Chanjali Devi by Advocate, Prittam
Singh Kanwar, is alleged to be forged. The aforesaid
Vakalatnama is alleged to bear the thumb impression of Smt.
Chanjali Devi.
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
By virtue of the present application, the applicant seeks
.
permission to have access to the original Vakalatnama filed in
RFA No.38 of 2019 on behalf of Smt. Chanjali Devi by Advocate
Prittam Singh Kanwar in order to send the same to SFSL, Junga
for analysis and comparison with the thumb impression of Smt.
Chanjali Devi.
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicants/appellants.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant. For the reasons
stated in the application and in the interest of justice, the present
application is allowed. Registry is directed to furnish the original
Vakalatnama lying in the file (RFA No.38 of 2019) alleged to
contain thumb impression of Smt. Chanjali Devi to the applicant.
It is made clear that once SFSL Junga opines with respect to the
original Vakalatnama of Smt. Chanjali Devi filed in RFA No.38 of
2019, the same be returned to the Registry of this Court.
The application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
February 28, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Likhat Ram vs. Land Acquisition Collector, HPPWD
and others
RFA No.350 of 2015
.
28.02.2025 Present: Ms. Manjeet Kaur, Advocate, vice Mr. Naveen K.
Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the proposed legal
representatives of deceased appellant.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondents/State.
CMP No.24895 of 2024
01.08.2018.
r to
The appeal (RFA), in the case at hand, was decided on
It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of
the applicants that no further proceedings against the said
decision is pending before the Hon’ble Apex Court.
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicants. The sole appellant, in the case at hand is stated to
have expired on 05.05.2020. The same is evident from the
Death Certificate (Annexure A-1) appended along with present
application. From perusal of the Legal Heir Certificate (Annexure
A-2) appended along with present application, it is evident that
the deceased sole appellant is survived by his legal heirs detailed
therein.
One of the legal heirs, i.e., Peer Chand, son of sole
deceased appellant-Likhit Ram is also stated to have expired on
15.11.2021. The same is evident from the Death Certificate
(Annexure A-3) appended along with present application.
Since the right to receive compensation, in the case at
hand, has accrued upon the legal heirs of the aforesaid deceased
appellant, therefore, the present application is allowed. The legal
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
.
heris of sole deceased appellant and his deceased legal heir,
namely Peer Chand, are ordered to be brought on record.
The application stands disposed of. Amended memo of
parties filed with the application is taken on record.
CMP No.24896 of 2024
The appeal (RFA), in the case at hand, was decided on
01.08.2018. r
It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of
the applicants that no further proceedings against the said
decision is pending before the Hon’ble Apex Court.
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicants. The non-applicants have no objection, if in case, the
amount deposited in the Registry of this Court along with up-to-
date interest accrued thereupon, is ordered to be released in
favour of the applicants.
In view of aforesaid and for the reasons stated in the
application, the same is allowed. The amount lying deposited in
the Registry of this Court along with proportionate interest
accrued thereupon, is ordered to be released in favour of the
applicants, as per their share, by remitting the same in their bank
accounts, details whereof, have been furnished in Paragraphs-4
and 7 of the application, subject to proper verification. The
application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
February 28, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Avantika Sharma vs. Prateek Sharma
CMPMO No.60 of 2025
.
28.02.2025 Present: Mr. Vijay Kumar, Advocate, vice Mr. Ashok Kumar Tyagi,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner
submits that the original counsel is unavailable today on account
of personal difficulty and prays for an adjournment. Prayer not
opposed. List after two weeks.
r ( Bipin C. Negi )
February 28, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Kishan and others vs. Shiv Ram (since deceased)
through LRs. and others
RSA No.254 of 2022
.
28.02.2025 Present: Mr. Kuldeep Singh Chandel, Mr. Kamaljeet Sharma,
Advocates, for the appellants.
Mr. Romesh Verma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sumit
Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.1(a), 1(c) to 1(e), 2
& 3.
CMP No.399 of 2025
Further time prayed for filing reply.
r Let the needful be
done within three weeks.
RSA No.254 of 2022
Record stands received. Learned counsel for the parties
intend to go through the same. List for consideration after three
weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
February 28, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Lal Chand and others vs. Rattan Chand (deceased)
through his LRs. and others
CMPMO No.732 of 2024
.
28.02.2025 Present: Mr. Atharv Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. K.D. Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vivek Thakur,
Advocate, for respondents No.1(a) & 2(a).
Mr. Pradeep Kumar Sharma, Advocate, for respondent
No.3.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the
objections in the application filed for bringing on record the legal
heirs of deceased respondent No.2 (b)-Kamlesh Kumari have
been removed today. If in order, list the application for
consideration before this Court after one week.
( Bipin C. Negi )
February 28, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Ajay Pal Singh vs. Mala Guleria
CMPMO No.706 of 2024
.
28.02.2025 Present: Mr. Kunal Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Nand Lal Thakur, Advocate, for the respondent.
Power of attorney on behalf of the respondent is stated to
have been filed.
At the joint request of learned counsel for the parties, list
for consideration on 17.03.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
February 28, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Narender Kumar vs. Nitin Chauhan
CMPMO No.682 of 2024
.
28.02.2025 Present: Ms. Saroj, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms. Sakshi Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent.
CMP No.22836 of 2024
Reply, as prayed, be filed on or before the next date of
hearing. List on 04.04.2025. Till then, interim order to continue.
r ( Bipin C. Negi )
February 28, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
The Oxford Public School Education Society vs.
Mahant Ram Mohan Dass
RSA No.292 of 2024
.
28.02.2025 Present: Mr. Anirudh Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Pranjal Munjal, Advocate, for the respondent.
CMP No.24449 of 2024
Reply, as prayed, be filed within four weeks. List
thereafter.
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
February 28, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Tara Devi vs. Vikas Sharma and another
RSA No.243 of 2024
.
28.02.2025 Present: Mr. P.S. Goverdhan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rakesh
Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Praveen Chauhan, Advocate, vice Mr. Sanjay Prashar,
Advocate, for respondent No.1.
None for respondent No.2.
Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of respondent
No.1 submits that the original counsel is unavailable today on
account of personal difficulty and prays for an adjournment.
Prayer not opposed. List on 24.03.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
February 28, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Land Acquisition Collector, HPPWD and others vs.
Shyam Lal and others
RFA No.19 of 2024
.
28.02.2025 Present: Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
appellants/State.
Mr. O.C. Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 5.
At the request of learned Additional Advocate General, the
matter is adjourned in order to enable the appellants to prepare
the case. List after three weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
February 28, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Dinesh Kumar and another vs. Ajay Kumar
RSA No.273 of 2023
.
28.02.2025 Present: Mr. Sudhir Thakur, Senior Advocate with Mr. Somesh
Sharma, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Rupinder Singh Thakur, Advocate, for the respondent.
CMP No.2891 of 2025
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is
allowed. The certified copy of the judgment and decree dated
28.10.2022 passed by the trial Court is taken on record. The
same be placed at its appropriate place in the paper book.
The application stands disposed of.
RSA No.273 of 2023
Record stands received. Learned counsel for the parties
intend to go through the same. List on 05.03.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
February 28, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Rameshwar Dutt vs. Arun Patiyal and others
RSA No.203 of 2022
.
28.02.2025 Present: Mr. Arthav, Advocate, vice Mr. Pranshul Sharma,
Advocate, for the appellant.
None for respondents No.1 & 2.
Mr. Sudhir Thakur, Senior Advocate with Mr. Somesh
Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant
submits that the original counsel is unavailable today on account
of personal difficulty and prays for an adjournment. Prayer not
opposed. List after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
February 28, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
State of Himachal Pradesh and others vs. Baldev Raj
and others
RFA No.382 of 2009
.
28.02.2025 Present: Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
appellants/State.
Mr. Mukesh Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Vijay Sharma,
Advocate, for the respondents/applicants.
CMP No.262 of 2025
r to
The present application is dismissed as withdrawn with
liberty to file a fresh application with better particulars.
application stands disposed of.
The
( Bipin C. Negi )
February 28, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Managing Director, HPMC and another vs. Surender Singh
and others
CMP(M) No.201 of 2025
.
28.02.2025 Present: Mr. Rahul Gathania, Advocate, for the applicants-
appellants.
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the
respondents, returnable within four weeks.
February 28, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Ram Lal vs. Kanta Devi (deceaed) through LR
RSA No.430 of 2012
.
25.02.2025 Present: Mr. Vishwas Kaushal, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Rakesh Kumar Thakur, Advocate, for respondent
No.1(a).
Time prayed for filing fresh power of attorney on behalf of
the appellant. Let the needful be done within three weeks. List
thereafter.
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
February 25, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
General Manager, Parbati Hydro Electric Project and
another vs. Kishan Chand and another
RFA No.825 of 2012 a/w RFA Nos.826 to
.
838, 928, 948 to 951 of 2012
RFA No.825 to 838 of 2012
Ms. Shreya Chauhan, Advocate, for the appellants, in all
25.02.2025 Present:
the appeals.
Mr. Sunil Mohan Goel, Senior Advocate with Mr. Raman
Jamalta, Advocate, for the private respondents.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
RFAs No. 928, 948 to 951/2012
Mr. Sunil Mohan Goel, Senior Advocate with Mr. Raman
Jamalta, Advocate, for the appellants, in all the appeals.
Ms. Shreya Chauhan, Advocate, for the respondents-
Parbati Hydro Electric Project.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
Learned counsel for the appellants seeks time to prepare
the case at hand. Prayer not opposed. List for consideration on
22.03.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
February 25, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
NTPC Ltd. vs. Subhash and others
CMP Nos.24765 & 24768 of 2024
.
in RFA No.391 of 2014
25.02.2025 Present: Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vedhant
Ranta, Advocate, for the appellant/non-applicant.
Ms. Veena Sharma, Advocate, for the respondents/
applicants.
CMP No.24765 of 2024
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicant. The non-applicant has no objection, if in case the legal
heirs of deceased respondent No.16, namely Munshi, are brought
on record as is being sought in the present application.
Respondent No.16, in terms of Death Certificate appended
along with present application, has expired on 28.12.2010. From
perusal of the Death Certificate, it is evident that deceased
Munshi Ram is survived by his seven legal heirs, detailed therein.
However, in terms of Will, his property has devolved upon two
legal heirs, namely Premi Devi and Chet Ram, the present
applicants.
Since the right to receive compensation, in the case at
hand, has accrued upon the aforesaid two applicants, i.e., legal
heirs of deceased respondent No.16, therefore, they are ordered
to be brought on record.
The application stands disposed of. Amended memo of
parties be filed within two weeks.
CMP No.24768 of 2024
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicant. The non-applicant has no objection, if in case the
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
-2-
amount lying deposited in the Registry of this Court is ordered to
.
be released along with proportionate interest in favour of the
present applicants, namely Premi Devi and Chet Ram.
The appeal, in the case at hand, was dismissed vide
judgment dated 06.04.2018. No further proceedings, in the case
at hand, are pending before the Hon’ble Apex Court.
In view of the fact that the right to receive the
compensation amount has accrued upon the present applicants,
namely Premi Devi and Chet Ram, the present application is
allowed. The amount lying deposited in the Registry of this Court
along with proportionate interest accrued thereupon, is ordered to
be released in favour of the applicants by remitting the same in
their bank accounts, as per their shares, details whereof, have
been furnished in Paragraph-8 of the application, subject to
proper verification. The application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
February 25, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
NTPC Limited vs. Sarla and others
Civil Revision No.30 of 2024
.
25.02.2025 Present: Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vedhant
Ranta, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Gambhir Singh, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 6.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.7/State.
Civil Revision No.30 of 2024
Admit.r
Hearing be expedited.
List for hearing in the month of August, 2025.
CMP No.2559 of 2024
Since the entire awarded amount along with interest
accrued thereupon stands deposited in the Registry of this Court,
interim order dated 14.03.2024 is made absolute. The application
stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
February 25, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
NTPC Limited vs. Mahanti (deceased) through her LR.
and another
.
Civil Revision No.29 of 2024
25.02.2025 Present: Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vedhant
Ranta, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Gambhir Singh, Advocate, for legal representative of
respondent No.1.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.2/State.
Civil Revision No.24 of 2024
Admit.
Hearing be expedited.
List for hearing in the month of August, 2025.
CMP No.2536 of 2024
Since the entire awarded amount along with interest
accrued thereupon stands deposited in the Registry of this Court,
interim order dated 14.03.2024 is made absolute. The application
stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
February 25, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
NTPC Limited vs. Chinta and others
Civil Revision No.27 of 2024
.
25.02.2025 Present: Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vedhant
Ranta, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Gambhir Singh, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 3.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.4/State.
Admit.
r to
Civil Revision No.27 of 2024
Hearing be expedited.
List for hearing in the month of August, 2025.
CMP No.2529 of 2024
Since the entire awarded amount along with interest
accrued thereupon stands deposited in the Registry of this Court,
interim order dated 14.03.2024 is made absolute. The application
stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
February 25, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Yashoda Devi vs. Kaushalya Devi and others
RSA No.198 of 2022
.
25.02.2025 Present: Mr. Virender Singh Kanwar, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Ashok Kumar Verma, Advocate, for respondents No.1
to 3.
None for respondents No.4 and 5 to 7.
RSA No.198 of 2022
after four weeks.
CMP No.4704 of 2024
At the request of learned counsel for the appellant, list
Reply stands filed on behalf of non-applicants/respondents
No.1 to 3. No rejoinder is intended to be filed thereto on behalf of
the applicant/appellant.
List along-with main matter after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
February 25, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Raj Kumar vs. The Kangra Central Co-operative Bank
RSA No.118 of 2020
.
25.02.2025 Present: Mr. Shivam Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Gobind Korla,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Rakesh Kumar Thakur, Advocate, for the respondent.
At the request of learned vice counsel appearing on behalf
of the appellant, list after ten days.
r ( Bipin C. Negi )
February 25, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Prem Chand and others vs. Jatinder Kumar Khullar
and another
.
RSA No.42 of 2013
25.02.2025 Present: Mr. R.K. Gautam, Senior Advocate with Mr. Jai Ram
Sharma, Advocate, for the appellants.
Ms. Devyani Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Basant Pal
Thakur, Advocate, for the respondents.
CMP No.2492 of 2025
Time prayed on behalf of the non-applicants to file reply.
Let the needful be done within two weeks. List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
February 25, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Naresh Kumar vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Cr.MP(M) No.175 of 2025
.
25.02.2025 Present: Mr. K.S. Gill, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
Learned Additional Advocate General seeks further time to
file status report. Let the needful be done on or before the next
date of hearing.
List on 13.03.2025.
r to
( Bipin C. Negi )
February 25, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
State of Himachal Pradesh and others vs. Tej Singh
and another
CMP(M) No.170 of 2025
.
25.02.2025 Present: Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
applicants-appellants/State.
At the request of learned Additional Advocate General, list
on 17.03.2025.
February 25, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Gurbhinder vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Cr.MP(M) No.81 of 2025
.
25.02.2025 Present: Mr. Ram Lal Verma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
Learned Additional Advocate General seeks further time to
file status report. Let the needful be done on or before the next
date of hearing.
List on 07.03.2025.
r to
( Bipin C. Negi )
February 25, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Chuhar Singh (deceased) through his LRs. vs. Milkha
Singh (deceased) through his LRs. and another
.
CMPMO No.33 of 2025
24.02.2025 Present: Mr. P.S. Goverdhan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rakesh
Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ajeet Pal
Singh Jaswal, Advocate, for respondents No.1(a) to 1(g).
CMPMO No.33 of 2025
Respondent No.2, though served, but there is no
appearance on his behalf. Hence, he is proceeded against ex
parte.
CMP No.1371 of 2025
Reply is stated to have been filed today itself. Copy,
whereof, stands supplied to learned counsel for the petitioners.
List for consideration on 07.03.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
February 24, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Col. Vikram Singh (deceased) through his LRs. vs.
Shrikant Krishan and others
RFA No.7 of 2025
.
24.02.2025 Present: Mr. Ajay Kumar Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rahul,
Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. R.K. Gautam, Senior Advocate with Mr. Jai Ram
Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Ajeet Pal Singh Jaswal, Advocate, for respondents
No.2(a) to 2(d), 3 and 4.
CMP No.2044 of 2025
r to
Reply, as prayed, be filed on or before the next date of
hearing. List for consideration of the application, on 10.03.2025.
RFA No.7 of 2025
Admit.
Hearing be expedited since the agreement to sell, of
which, specific performance is sought, pertains to the year, 2007.
List for hearing in the month of May, 2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
February 24, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Joginder Singh vs. Kartar Singh
CMPMO No.479 of 2024
.
24.02.2025 Present: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Atharv
Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Arun Sehgal, Advocate, for the respondent.
At the joint request of learned counsel for the parties, list
on 13.03.2025.
February 24, 2025 (KS)
to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Daulat Ram vs. Melo and another
RSA No.121 of 2024
.
24.02.2025 Present: Mr. Dheeraj K. Vashisht, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Rahul Gathania, Advocate, vice Mr. Mukul Sood,
Advocate, for the respondents.
Record stands received. Learned counsel for the parties
intend to go through the same.
In view of the fact that the record stands received, filing of
the copy of the trial Court judgment is dispensed with.
List after four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
February 24, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
State of Himachal Pradesh and others vs. Vikas
Thakur
.
RFA No.56 of 2024
24.02.2025 Present: Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the appellants/State.
Mr. P.S. Goverdhan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rakesh
Thakur, Advocate, for the respondent.
Admit.
List along-with RFA No.33 of 2024.
( Bipin C. Negi )
February 24, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Devi Singh vs. Subhash Chand
RSA No.27 of 2024
.
24.02.2025 Present: Ms. Mamta Bhatwan, Advocate, vice Mr. B.N. Sharma,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Maan Singh, Advocate, for the respondent.
At the request of learned vice counsel appearing on behalf
of the appellant, list on 20.03.2025.
February 24, 2025 (KS)
to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Manmohan Singh @ Manmohan Kumar Sharma vs.
Naresh Kumar and others
.
RSA No.24 of 2024
24.02.2025 Present: Mr. Virender Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Parv Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.1, 2, 4 &
5.
Respondent No.3 proceeded against ex parte vide order
dated 27.12.2024.
after three weeks.
At the joint request of learned counsel for the parties, list
( Bipin C. Negi )
February 24, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Dev Raj vs. Durga Dass and others
RSA No.16 of 2024
.
24.02.2025 Present: Ms. Chetna Thapar, Advocate, vice Mr. Saurav Rattan,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Ajay Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. Sunny Moudgill,
Advocate, for respondent No.1.
None for respondents No.2 and 3.
CMP No.9351 of 2024
Time to file rejoinder is sought since 03.09.2024.
However, the same has not been filed till date.
Let the rejoinder, as prayed, be positively filed within two
weeks. It is made clear that if the rejoinder is not filed within two
weeks, then the right to file rejoinder shall automatically stand
closed.
List on 18.03.2024.
( Bipin C. Negi )
February 24, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Veena and others vs. Skhika and others
RSA No.9 of 2023
.
24.02.2025 Present: Mr. Ajay Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. Sunny Modgil,
Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr. Abhishek Nagta, Advocate, vice Mr. Pramod Singh
Thakur, Advocate, for respondents No.1, 2 and 3.
Mr. Mohar Sigh, Advocate, for respondent No.4.
None for respondents No.5 & 6.
Record stands received. Learned counsel for the parties
intend to go through the same.
List on 18.03.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
February 24, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Bihari Lal (since deceased) through his LRs. vs.
Khushi Ram and another
.
RSA No.358 of 2022
24.02.2025 Present: Mr. Rajesh Mandhotra, Advocate, for the appellant.
None for the respondents.
Records be called for.
List on 21.04.2025.
r ( Bipin C. Negi )
February 24, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Munish Kumar vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Cr.MP(M) No.189 of 2025
.
24.02.2025 Present: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
Notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate
General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the
file status report.
r to
respondent-State. He prays for and is granted four weeks’ time to
List on 27.03.2025, on which date, respondent/State shall
file Status report.
( Bipin C. Negi )
February 24, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Khushi Ram vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Cr.MP(M) No.318 of 2025
.
24.02.2025 Present: Ms. Suman Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
Notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate
General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the
file status report.
r to
respondent-State. He prays for and is granted four weeks’ time to
List on 26.03.2025, on which date, respondent/State shall
file Status report.
( Bipin C. Negi )
February 24, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Arvind Kumar vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Cr.MP(M) No.316 of 2025
.
24.02.2025 Present: Mr. Sarthak Mehta and Mr. Prashant Chauhan, Advocates,
for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
Notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate
General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the
respondent-State. He prays for and is granted four weeks’ time to
file status report.
List on 25.03.2025, on which date, respondent/State shall
file Status report.
( Bipin C. Negi )
February 24, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Ritesh Kumar vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Cr.MP(M) No.315 of 2025
.
24.02.2025 Present: Mr. Sarthak Mehta and Mr. Prashant Chauhan, Advocates,
for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
Notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate
General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the
respondent-State. He prays for and is granted four weeks’ time to
file status report.
List on 25.03.2025, on which date, respondent/State shall
file Status report.
( Bipin C. Negi )
February 24, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Sahil Thakur vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Cr.MP(M) No.242 of 2025
.
24.02.2025 Present: Mr. Vijay Panchta, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
Notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate
General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the
respondent-State. He prays for and is granted four weeks’ time to
file status report.
List on 27.03.2025, on which date, respondent/State shall
file Status report.
( Bipin C. Negi )
February 24, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Narinder vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Cr.MP(M) No.265 of 2025
.
24.02.2025 Present: Mr. Karan Singh, Advocate, vice Mr. Manoj Pathak,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
Notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate
General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the
respondent-State. He prays for and is granted four weeks’ time to
file status report.
List on 27.03.2025, on which date, respondent/State shall
file Status report.
( Bipin C. Negi )
February 24, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Naval vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Cr.MP(M) No.186 of 2025
.
24.02.2025 Present: Mr. Karan Singh, Advocate, vice Mr. Manoj Pathak,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
Notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate
General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the
respondent-State. He prays for and is granted four weeks’ time to
file status report.
List on 26.03.2025, on which date, respondent/State shall
file Status report.
( Bipin C. Negi )
February 24, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Land Acquisition Collector and another vs. Bhola Ram
(deceased) through his LRs.
CMP No.2471 of 2025 in RFA No.134 of 2019
.
24.02.2025 Present: Mr. Yashveer Singh Rathore, Advocate, for the appellants-
non applicants.
Mr. Vaibhav Kanwar, Advocate, for the respondents No.2
& 3/applicants.
Mr. R.S. Verma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondents/non-applicants/State.
r to
Learned counsel for the non-applicants seeks time to have
instructions. List after ten days.
( Bipin C. Negi )
February 24, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Land Acquisition Collector and another vs. Bhola Ram
(deceased) through his LRs.
CMP No.2471 of 2025 in RFA No.134 of 2019
.
24.02.2025 Present: Mr. Yashveer Singh Rathore, Advocate, for the appellants-
non applicants.
Mr. Vaibhav Kanwar, Advocate, for the respondents No.2
& 3/applicants.
Mr. R.S. Verma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondents/non-applicants/State.
r to
Learned counsel for the non-applicants seeks time to have
instructions. List after ten days.
( Bipin C. Negi )
February 24, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
The Land Acquisition Collector and others vs. Rattan
Lal and another
CMP(M) Nos.167 of 2025 & 166 of 2025
.
in RFA No.56 of 2018
24.02.2025 Present: Mr. R.S. Verma, Additional Advocate General, for the
appellants-non-applicants/State.
Mr. Rakesh Thakur, Advocate, for the respondents-
applicants.
Reply be filed within four weeks. List thereafter.
r ( Bipin C. Negi )
February 24, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Jeet Bahadur vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Cr. MP(M) No.110 of 2025
.
24.02.2025 Present: Mr. Karan Kapoor, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. R.S. Verma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
Learned Additional Advocate General seeks time to file
status report. Let the needful be done on or before the next date
of hearing.
List on 25.03.2025.
r to
( Bipin C. Negi )
February 24, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Gaurav Sharma and others vs. State of HP and others
Cr.MMO No.1267 of 2024
.
10.01.2025 Present: Mr. Ajay Singh Rana, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. R.S. Verma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.1/State.
Respondents No.2 to 4 are served, but none has entered
appearance on their behalf.
List on 17.03.2025.
r ( Bipin C. Negi )
January 10, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Kapil Shankar vs. Som Nath alias Swami Nath Shankar
and others
Cr.MMO No.1156 of 2024
.
10.01.2025 Present: Mr. Panku Chaudhary, Advocate, vice Mr. Khem Raj,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
At the request of learned vice counsel appearing on behalf
of the petitioner, list the matter for consideration after ensuing
winter vacation in the first week of March, 2025.
r ( Bipin C. Negi )
January 10, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Parwati Thakur vs. Dine Ram
Cr.MMO No.863 of 2024
.
10.01.2025 Present: Mr. Karan Singh Kanwar, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Cr.MMO No.863 of 2024
On taking steps within three days, let notice be issued to
the respondent, returnable for 06.03.2025.
Cr.MP No.3652/2024
From perusal of the order-sheets appended along with
present application, it is evident that the matter is now ordered to
be listed on 17.02.2025 for recording of statement of the accused
under Section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
In this regard, it is ordered that statement of accused
under Section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure may be
recorded, but no final order/judgment shall be passed by the trial
Court during the pendency of the present petition.
Application stands disposed of.
Cr.MP No.3653/2024
Allowed and the applicant is exempted from filing complete
typed English translation of the documents, in question, annexed
with the accompanying petition, at this stage, subject to filing of
the same within seven days, as and when directed to do so.
The application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 10, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Prashant Chauhan vs. Baldev Singh
Criminal Revision No.439 of 2023
.
10.01.2025 Present: Mr. Y.P. Sood, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms. Preetika Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. Sarthak Mehta,
Advocate, for the respondent.
In pursuance to order dated 31.12.2024, compliance report
stands filed. From perusal of the compliance report, it is evident
06.02.2025.
r in
that non bailable warrants have been issued against the present
petitioner/accused, the case at hand, returnable for
In view thereof, list the matter after ensuing winter vacation
in the fourth week of March, 2025 for placing on record the
compliance of the non bailable warrants.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 10, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Balak Ram vs. Hem Raj Thakur and another
Criminal Revision No.311 of 2023
.
10.01.2025 Present: Mr. J.S. Bagga, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms. Tim Saran, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.2/State.
In terms of judgment dated 09.12.2024, the compounding
fee, in the case at hand to the tune of Rs.37,500/- (15% of the
cheque amount) stands deposited by the petitioner before the
Himachal Pradesh State Legal Services Authority, Shimla, on
09.01.2025. In this respect, a receipt has been shown to the
Court. The same is seen and returned to the counsel for the
petitioner. Copy of the same is taken on record.
In view thereof, present proceedings are closed.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 10, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Arun Kumar vs. Anoop Chauhan
Criminal Revision No.530 of 2022
.
10.01.2025 Present: Ms. Simran and Ms. Kusum Chaudhary, Advocates, for the
petitioner/non-applicant.
Mr. P.M. Negi, Advocate, for the respondent/applicant.
Cr.MP No.3709/2024
Though, no reply has been filed on behalf of the non-
applicant, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the non
applicant submits that only amount lying deposited in the Registry
of this Court be released in favour of the applicant.
Keepping in view the aforesaid submission and for the
reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. The
amount lying deposited in the Registry of this Court along with up-
to-date interest accrued thereupon, is ordered to be released in
favour of the applicant by remitting the same in his bank account,
details whereof, have been furnished in Paragraph-3 of the
application, subject to proper verification.
However, it is made clear that no order has been passed
in favour of the applicant permitting him to make an application
for release of the amount deposited before the trial Court.
The application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 10, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Punit Sharma vs. Nand Lal (since deceased) through
LRs. and others a/w connected matter
CMPMO No.86 of 2020 a/w
.
CMPMO No.260 of 2021
CMPMO No.86 of 2020
10.01.2025 Present: Ms. Meera Devi, Advocate, vice Mr. Deepak Gupta,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Respondents No.1, 8 and 10 are stated to have died.
Ms. Kusum Chaudhary, Advocate, for respondents No.2 to
7, 9 and for proposed legal representatives No.1(i) to 1(iii)
of deceased respondent No.1.
Mr. Sumit Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. B.C. Verma,
Advocate, for respondent No.6.
CMPMO No.260 of 2021
Mr. Sumit Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. B.C. Verma,
Advocate, for the petitioners.
Ms. Kusum Chaudhary, Advocate, for respondents No.3,
4(b), 5(a) & 5(c).
Ms. Meera Devi, Advocate, vice Mr. Deepak Gupta,
Advocate, for respondent No.9.
Respondents No.2 and 4(a) stated to have expired.
CMPMO No.260/2021 & CMPMO No.86/2020
Further time prayed for taking consequential steps for
bringing on record the legal heirs of deceased respondents No.2
and 4(a)
Let the needful be done within four weeks.
CMP No.26326/2024 in CMPMO No.260/2021
By virtue of present application, the factum of death of
respondent No.2 is sought to be brought on record. The same
has already been noticed previously by this Court and steps for
bringing on record the legal heirs of deceased respondent No.2
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
have been sought to be taken. In view thereof, present
.
application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 10, 2025 (KS) Judge
r to
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Vijay Kumar Karwa and another vs. M/s Ruchira Paper
Ltd. and another
Criminal Revision No.4083 of 2013
.
10.01.2025 Present: Mr. Abhishek Verma, Advocate, vice Mr. Amar Deep
Singh, Advocate, for petitioner No.2.
Petitioner No.1 is stated to have expired.
Mr. K.D. Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Het Ram Thakur,
Advocate, for respondents No.1.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.2/State.
In pursuance to previous order dated 12.12.2024, Death
Certificate of deceased petitioner No.1-Vijay Kumar Karwa has
been placed on record.
From perusal of the same, it is evident that petitioner No.1-
Vijay Kumar Karwa had died on 26.05.2024. Other than the
aforesaid, the Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna (Bihar) has
informed that deceased petitioner No.1-Vijay Kumar Karwa is
survived by his legal heir, one Vivek Kumar Karwa.
In view of aforesaid, legal heir of deceased petitioner-Vijay
Kumar Karwa, i.e., Vivek Kumar Karwa, is impleaded as
petitioner.
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the
newly added petitioner, i.e., Vivek Kumar Karwa, returnable within
four weeks. Notice be issued on the address of deceased
petitioner -Vijay Kumar Karwa.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 10, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Hira Singh vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and another
Cr.MMO No.1065 of 2024
.
10.01.2025 Present: Mr. Subhash Mohan Snehi and Ms. Niranjana, Advocates,
for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.1/State.
Cr.MMO No.1065/2024 & Cr.MP No.284/2025
FIR, in the case at hand, has been registered against the
present petitioner under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 of the Indian
Penal Code, on 19.11.2022. The allegation against the petitioner
is that way back in the year, 1984, he had secured appointment in
the Indian Army on the basis of forged documents.
From perusal of copy of letter dated 19.06.2023 appended
along with present petition as Annexure P-9, it is evident that the
concerned branch of the Indian Army has issued the same
clarifying therein that the petitioner/applicant, in the case at hand,
was enrolled in the Indian Army with valid documents and had
served the Army with full dedication for seventeen years.
Notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate
General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of
respondent No.1/State. He prays for and is granted four weeks’
time to file reply/status report. On taking steps within three days,
let notice be issued to respondent No.2, returnable within four
weeks.
Taking into account the aforesaid, in the meanwhile,
further proceedings in case bearing Registration No.32/2024
(CNRNo.HPKU 020023512024), titled State of H.P. vs. Hira
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Singh, pending before learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lahaul &
Spiti at Keylong, Himachal Pradesh, shall remain stayed.
.
List after four weeks. Reply, if any, on behalf of
respondent No.1/State be filed on or before the next date of
hearing.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 10, 2025 (KS) Judge
r to
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Jeet Bahadur vs. State of Himachal Pradesh.
Cr.MP(M) No.110 of 2025
.
10.01.2025 Present: Mr. Karan Kapoor and Mr. Nitish, Advocates, for the
petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
Notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate
General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the
respondent-State. He prays for and is granted four weeks’ time to
file status report.
List on 14.02.2025, on which date, respondent/State shall
file Status report.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 10, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Devi Saran vs. Sauju Ram(deceased) through LRs.
Cr.MP No.283 of 2025 in
Cr. Revision No.270 of 2024
.
10.01.2025 Present: Mr. R.S. Chandel, Advocate, for the petitioner/applicant.
Cr.MP No.283 of 2025
Vide judgment dated 09.12.2024 passed in Crminal
Revision No.270 of 2024, an offence punishable under Section
138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, insofar as the applicant is
concerned, was compounded. While compounding the offence in
terms of judgment passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in
Damodar S. Prabhu vs. Sayed Babalal H. 2010(5) SCC 663,
the petitioner was required to pay 15% of the cheque amount as
compounding fee. The said amount was to be paid to the H.P.
State Legal Services Authroity, Shimla within eight weeks from
the date of passing of the judgment.
The present application has been filed invoking inherrent
powers of this Court to modify the aforesaid judgment to the
extent that the compounding fee, i.e., 15% of the cheque
amount, which was required to be paid by the petitioner, be
reduced to 5% to securing the ends of justice.
By virtue of present application, taking into account the
financial condition of the present applicant/petitioner, the
compounding fee, in the case at hand, is reduced to 5% of the
cheque amount. The same be paid to the H.P. State Legal
Services Authority, Kusumpati, Shimla-9, H.P., within a period of
four weeks from today.
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Report qua deposit of 5% of the cheque amount with HP
.
State Legal Services Authority be sought from the concerned
authority on or before 04.02.2025, the date already fixed. In the
meanwhile, petitioner is also free to place copy of receipt qua
payment made to the HP State Legal Services Authority.
Application stands disposed of.
January 10, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Roshan Lal vs. Bhim Dev
Cr. Revision No.64 of 2024
.
10.01.2025 Present: Mr. Lal Singh Mehta, Advocate, for the petitioner/non-
applicant.
Mr. Vishal Singh Thakur, Advocate, for the respondent/
applicant.
Cr.MP No.280 of 2025
The present application has been filed in furtherance of
judgment dated 08.01.2025, passed in Criminal Revision No.64
of 2024.
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicant. The non-applicant has no objection, if in case, the
amount deposited in the Registry of this Court along with up-to-
date interest accrued thereupon, is ordered to be released in
favour of the applicant.
In view of aforesaid and for the reasons stated in the
application, the same is allowed. The amount lying deposited in
the Registry of this Court along with up-to-date interest accrued
thereupon, is ordered to be released in favour of the applicant by
remitting the same in his bank account, details whereof, have
been furnished in Paragraph-8 of the application, subject to
proper verification. The application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 10, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Sita Ram vs. Baldev Chand
Cr. Revision No.797 of 2024
.
10.01.2025 Present: Mr. G.R. Palsra, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Cr.MP No.270 of 2025
Notice, in the case at hand, has been issued to the sole
respondent, returnable for 24.2.2025.
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is
allowed. Time for complying with order dated 09.12.2024 is
extended by four weeks from today. Application stands disposed
of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 10, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Prakash Chand vs. Baldev Chand
Cr. Revision No.796 of 2024
.
10.01.2025 Present: Mr. G.R. Palsra, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Cr.MP No.269 of 2025
Notice, in the case at hand, has been issued to the sole
respondent, returnable for 27.2.2025.
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is
allowed. Time for complying with order dated 09.12.2024 is
extended by four weeks from today. Application stands disposed
of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 10, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Nayaz Mohd. vs. The H.P. State Cooperative
Agriculture & Rural Development Bank
Cr.MP No.265 of 2025 in
.
Cr. Revision No.688 of 2022
10.01.2025 Present: Mr. Dheeraj K. Vashisht, Advocate, for the petitioner/non-
applicant.
Mr. Narender Singh Thakur, Advocate, for respondent
No.1/ applicant.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.2/State/non-applicant.
Cr.MP No.265 of 2025
The present application has been filed in furtherance of
judgment dated 20.12.2024, passed in Criminal Revision No.688
of 2022.
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicants. The non-applicant has no objection, if in case, the
amount deposited in the Registry of this Court along with up-to-
date interest accrued thereupon, is ordered to be released in
favour of the applicant.
In view of aforesaid and for the reasons stated in the
application, the same is allowed. The amount lying deposited in
the Registry of this Court along with up-to-date interest accrued
thereupon, is ordered to be released in favour of the applicant by
remitting the same in his bank account, details whereof, have
been furnished in Paragraph-4 of the application, subject to
proper verification. The application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 10, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Harbans Chaudhary vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Cr. MP(M) No.111 of 2025
.
10.01.2025 Present: Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Suri, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
Notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate
General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the
file status report.
r to
respondent-State. He prays for and is granted four weeks’ time to
List on 10.02.2025, on which date, respondent/State shall
file Status report.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 10, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Dhan Bahadur vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Cr. MP(M) No.107 of 2025
.
10.01.2025 Present: Mr. K.S. Gill, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
Notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate
General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the
file status report.
r to
respondent-State. He prays for and is granted four weeks’ time to
List on 27.01.2025, on which date, respondent/State shall
file Status report.
In the bail petition, documents with respect to the medical
condition of the bail petition have been placed on record. In the
status report, the medical condition of the bail petitioner be
appropriately dealt with.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 10, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Prem Singh vs. Duni Chand
Cr. Revision No.791 of 2024
.
10.01.2025 Present: Mr. Bonit Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms. Babita Chauhan, Advocate, for the respondent.
Vide judgment dated 04.12.2024, the present petition has
been disposed of and the judgment of conviction and order of
sentence passed by the trial Court and upheld by the appellate
Court, have been quashed and set aside, subject to deposit of
15% of the cheque amount by the petitioner, as compounding fee
in terms of judgment passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in
Damodar S. Prabhu vs. Sayed Babalal H. 2010(5) SCC 663.
The said amount was to be paid to the H.P. State Legal Services
Authroity, Shimla within four weeks from the date of passing of
the judgment. However, the said amount has not been deposited
till date.
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks further time to
deposit 15% of the cheque amount.
Let the needful be done within four weeks. It is made
clear that no further time shall be granted to the petitioner for
depositing the aforesaid amount.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 10, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Raj Kumari and another vs. Bimla Devi and others
CMPMO No.299 of 2017
.
10.01.2025 Present: Mr. Mohit Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. H.R. Jhingta, Advocate, for respondents No.12 to 17.
Respondents No.9 & 10 stated to have expired.
On filing correct address(es) of respondents No.7 & 8
weeks.
r to
within a week, let notice be issued to them, returnable within four
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 10, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Kamla Devi vs. Golf Link Finance & Resorts Pvt. Ltd.
Cr. Revision No.640 of 2024
.
09.01.2025 Present: Mr. Yashav Kumar, Advocate, vice Mr. Jagat Pal,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms. Seema K. Guleria, Advocate, for the respondent.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that order dated
30.08.2024 stands complied with as requisite compensation
amount directed therein stands deposited and the bail bonds stand
furnished to the satisfaction of learned Trial Court.
As prayed, list the matter after ensuing winter vacation in
the month of April, 2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 09, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Meena Sharma vs. Viket Khachi a/w connected matter
Cr. Appeal No.617 of 2024 a/w
Cr. Appeal No.356 of 2024
.
09.01.2025 Present: Mr. Ashir Kaith, Advocate, vice Mr. Hamender Singh
Chandel, Advocate, for the appellant, in both the appeals.
Mr. Sative Chauhan, Advocate, for the respondent, in both
the appeals.
Further time prayed for on behalf of learned counsel for
the parties to go through the record.
As prayed, list the matter after ensuing winter vacation in
the month of April, 2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 09, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Vivek Sood vs. Amarjeet Singh and another
Cr. Appeal No.606 of 2024
.
09.01.2025 Present: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Let fresh steps for the service of the respondents be taken
within three days. On taking such steps, issue notice to the
respondents, returnable within four weeks.
January 09, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Krishna Devi vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Cr. Appeal No.577 of 2024
.
09.01.2025 Present: Mr. Naveen Kumar, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Manish Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for the
respondents/State.
List the matter after ensuing winter vacation in the second
week of March, 2025.
January 09, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
M/s Himachal Traders through its proprietor Chander
Mohan vs. M/s Lakshay Traders
Cr. Revision No.475 of 2024
.
09.01.2025 Present: Mr. Parav Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Yashav Kumar, Advocate, vice Mr. Jagat Pal,
Advocate, for the respondent.
Record stands received. Learned counsel for the parties
intend to go through the same.
List the matter after ensuing winter vacation in the month
of April, 2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 09, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Sanju vs. Suresh Kumar Khera
Cr. Revision No.244 of 2023
.
09.01.2025 Present: Mr. Surya Chauhan, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms. Suchitra Sen, Advocate, for the respondent.
Learned counsel for the parties jointly submit that a sum of
Rs.5,000/- has been paid by the petitioner to the respondent in
discharge of liability qua the compensation amount fixed in the
case at hand. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the
petitioner that a balance sum of Rs.15,000/- shall be paid to the
respondent on or before the next date of hearing.
List the matter on 03.03.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 09, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Sukhvinder Singh and another vs. State of HP and
another
Cr.MMO No.379 of 2024
.
09.01.2025 Present: Mr. Surya Chauhan, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Manish Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for
respondent No.1/State.
Mr. Anshul Jairath, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
Further time prayed to file reply on behalf of respondent
No.2. r
Reply, as prayed, be filed within four weeks. Rejoinder
thereto, if any, be filed on or before the next date of hearing.
List the matter after ensuing winter vacation in the fourth
week of March, 2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 09, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
Procter & Gamble Hygiene and Health Care Ltd. vs.
State of HP and others
Cr.MMO No.266 of 2024
.
09.01.2025 Present: Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate with Ms. Shradha
Karol, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Manish Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for
respondents No.1 & 2/State.
Mr. Ashok Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Jeevesh
Mehta, Mr. Nihit Dalmia, Ms. Bhavna Sharma and
Ms. Anubhuti Sharma, Advocates, for the respondent.
List on 05.03.2025.
Interim order to continue.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 09, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS
M/s Kishori Lal and another vs. Shashi Sharma
Civil Revision No.170 of 2024
.
09.01.2025 Present: Mr. Ashok Kumar Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rajat,
Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate with Ms. Rinki
Kashmiri, Advocate, for the respondent.
In pursuance to the proposal filed by the petitioners on the
previous date of hearing, learned Senior Counsel appearing on
behalf of the respondent seeks time to have instructions qua the
same.
List on 04.03.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 09, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Kirpi and others vs. Shiv Ram and others
CMPMO No.130 of 2024
.
09.01.2025 Present: Ms. Seema K. Guleria, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. J.N. Kenan, Advocate, vice Mr. Tek Chand Sharma,
Advocate, for the respondents.
At the joint request of learned counsel for the parties, list
the matter after ensuing winter vacation in the month of April,
2025.
January 09, 2025 (KS)
to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
M/s Brijeshwari Apple Agency BAA Fruit Company and
another vs. Ajeet Singh
Cr. Revision No.51 of 2024
.
09.01.2025 Present: Mr. Jagmohan Singh Chandel, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. K.B. Khajuria, Advocate, for the respondent.
According to learned counsel for the petitioner,
approximately a sum of Rs.50,000/- stands deposited against the
Court below.
r to
compensation of Rs.97,000/-, which has been awarded by the
In the aforesaid circumstances, learned counsel for the
petitioner seeks further time to deposit the balance compensation
amount.
Let the needful be done on or before the next date of
hearing. List the matter after ensuing winter vacation in the
month of April, 2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 09, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
State of Himachal Pradesh vs. Kishore
Cr. Appeal No.252 of 2023
.
09.01.2025 Present: Mr. Manish Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for the
appellant/State.
Mr. Tijender Singh, Advocate, for the respondent.
List for hearing in due course.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 09, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Roshan Lal vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and another
Cr.MMO No.1269 of 2022
.
09.01.2025 Present: Mr. D.S. Kainthla, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Manish Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for
respondent No.1/State.
Mr. Jia Lal Thakur, Advocate, for the legal representative
of deceased respondent No.2, who is stated to have
expired.
Cr.MP No.1680/2024
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicants.
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is
allowed. Legal heir (Smt. Bholu), i.e., wife of deceased
respondent No.2-Ram Lal, is ordered to be brought on record.
Application stands disposed of. Amended memo of parties filed
with the present application is taken on record.
Cr.MMO No.1269/2022
List the matter after ensuing winter vacation in the fourth
week of March, 2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 09, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Kewal Krishan Indoria vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Cr.MMO No.917 of 2022
.
09.01.2025 Present: Ms Swati Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Vivek Sharma,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Manish Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for
respondent No.1/State.
At the request of learned vice counsel appearing on behalf
of the petitioner, list the matter after ensuing winter vacation in
the month of April, 2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 09, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
State of Himachal Pradesh vs. Geeta Singh a/w
connected matter
Cr.MMO No.54 of 2021 a/w
.
Cr.MMO No.459 of 2022
Cr.MMO No.54 of 2021
Mr. Manish Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for the
09.01.2025 Present:
petitioner/State.
Mr. Vishwa Bhushan, Advocate, for the respondent (since
deceased).
Cr.MMO No.459 of 2022
Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Senior Advocate with
Mr. Rajneesh K. Lal, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Manish Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for
respondents No.1 to 3/State.
Mr. Vishwa Bhushan, Advocate, respondent No.4 (since
deceased).
At the joint request of learned counsel for the parties, list
on 04.03.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 09, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Hari Om and another vs. State of HP
Cr.MMO No.1143 of 2024
.
08.01.2025 Present: Mr. Rohit, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. R.S. Verma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
At the request of learned counsel for the petitioners, list
the matter after ensuing winter vacation in the third week of
March, 2025.
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
January 08, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Sunil Kumar Panta vs. Vijay Singh Khurana
Cr.MP No.97 of 2025 in Cr. Revision No.1 of 2022
.
08.01.2025 Present: Mr. I.S. Chandel, Advocate, for the applicant/petitioner.
Mr. D.S. Nainta, Advocate, for the respondent/non-
applicant.
Cr.MP No.97/2025
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent
does not intend to file any reply to the present application, as he
admits the liability of the respondent to pay a sum of
Rs.2,00,000/- with interest accrued thereupon from 14.02.2023,
i.e., the date of deposit of the aforesaid amount as interim
compensation by the non/applicant in the Registry of this Court,
to the applicant.
Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the
aforesaid amount shall be deposited within eight weeks from
today.
List the matter for compliance after ensuing winter
vacation in the fourth week of March, 2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 08, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Sunil Kumar Panta vs. Vijay Singh Khurana
Cr.MP No.97 of 2025 in Cr. Revision No.1 of 2022
.
08.01.2025 Present: Mr. I.S. Chandel, Advocate, for the applicant/petitioner.
Mr. D.S. Nainta, Advocate, for the respondent/non-
applicant.
Cr.MP No.97/2025
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent
does not intend to file any reply to the present application, as he
admits the liability of the respondent to pay a sum of
Rs.2,00,000/- with interest accrued thereupon from 14.02.2023,
i.e., the date of deposit of the aforesaid amount as interim
compensation by the non/applicant in the Registry of this Court,
to the applicant.
Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the
aforesaid amount shall be deposited within eight weeks from
today.
List the matter for compliance after ensuing winter
vacation in the fourth week of March, 2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 08, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Kamal Sharma vs. Mohan Lal and another
Cr. Revision No.183 of 2024
.
08.01.2025 Present: Mr. Imran Khan, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Dibender Ghosh and Mr. Ashwani Negi, Advocates, for
respondent No.1.
Mr. R.S. Verma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.2/State.
Cr.MP No.96/2025
The present application shall be considered after the
applicant deposits the balance compensation amount, i.e.,
Rs.36,000/- in the Registry of this Court.
List the matter after ensuing winter vacation in the
second week of March, 2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 08, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Devi Saran vs. Sauju Ram (deceased) through LR
Hans Raj
Cr.MP No.5415 of 2024 in Cr. Revision No.270 of 2024
.
08.01.2025 Present: Mr. R.S. Chandel, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Cr.MP No.5415/2024
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to
withdraw the present application. Permission granted.
r to
Accordingly, present application is dismissed, as withdrawn.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 08, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Surinder Verma vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Cr.MP(M) No.2889 of 2024
.
08.01.2025 Present: Ms. Diksha Chauhan, Advocate, vice Ms. Anu Tuli,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
ASI Tej Singh, I/O Police Station, New Shimla, District
Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, is present along with record. Status
report stands filed. The same is taken on record. Copy, whereof,
has been supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner, who
intends to go through the same.
List for consideration, on 14.01.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 08, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Parbhat Kumar vs. State of Himachal Pradesh a/w
connected matter
Cr.MP(M) No.2886 of 2024 a/w
.
Cr.MP(M) No.2872 of 2024
08.01.2025 Present: Mr. Bhairav Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner(s).
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
ASI Raju Dhiman, I/O Police Station, Kihar, District
Chamba, Himachal Pradesh, is present along with record. Status
report stands filed. The same is taken on record. Copy, whereof,
has been supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner, who
intends to go through the same.
List for consideration, on 13.01.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 08, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Rakesh Kumar vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Cr.MP(M) No.2761 of 2024
.
08.01.2025 Present: Mr. Vipin Pandit, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
Ms. Suchitra Sen, Advocate, for the complainant.
ASI Dharampal, Police Station, Baddi, District Solan,
Himachal Pradesh, is present along with record. Status report
stands filed. The same is taken on record. Copy, whereof, has
been supplied to learned counsel for the parties, who intend to go
through the same.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has
moved an application for placing on record certain documents.
However, the same is not on record.
Registry to trace the application and place it on record well
before the next date of hearing, post removal of objection(s), if
any.
List on 13.01.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 08, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Dalip Kumar vs. Dharam Pal and another
Cr.MP(M) No.2694 of 2024
.
08.01.2025 Present: Mr. Mehar Chand, Advocate, for the applicant/appellant.
Mr. Vijay Singh Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.2/State.
Cr.MP(M) No.2694/2024
From perusal of the grounds of appeal, it is evident that
there exists an arguable case in favour of the present applicant.
In view thereof and for the reasons stated in the application, the
same is allowed. Leave to appeal is granted. The application
stands disposed of.
Cr. Appeal No._______/2025
Be registered.
Records be called for.
List the matter after ensuing winter vacation in the month
of April, 2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 08, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Dalip Kumar vs. Dharam Pal and another
Cr.MP(M) No.2693 of 2024
.
08.01.2025 Present: Mr. Mehar Chand, Advocate, for the applicant/appellant.
Mr. Vijay Singh Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.2/State.
Cr.MP(M) No.2693/2024
From perusal of the grounds of appeal, it is evident that
there exists an arguable case in favour of the present applicant.
In view thereof and for the reasons stated in the application, the
same is allowed. Leave to appeal is granted. The application
stands disposed of.
Cr. Appeal No._______/2025
Be registered.
Records be called for.
List the matter after ensuing winter vacation in the month
of April, 2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 08, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Keshav Kumai vs. State of HP
Cr.MP(M) No.2616 of 2024
.
08.01.2025 Present: Mr. C.D. Negi, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
At the request of learned counsel for the petitioner, list on
13.01.2025.
January 08, 2025 (KS)
to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Sandeep Kumar vs. Surinder Singh
Cr.MP(M) No.2510 of 2024
.
08.01.2025 Present: Mr. Divya Raj Singh, Advocate, for the applicant/
appellant.
Mr. Abhishek, Advocate, for the respondent/non-applicant.
Cr.MP(M) No.2510 of 2024
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicant/respondent.
From the reasons and sufficient cause shown in the
application, it is evident that the applicant was due diligently,
bona fidely, pursuing remedies available to him under law. No
inaction is attributable to the applicant on account of the
explanation offered in the application for getting the delay of 17
days in filing the appeal condoned.
Other than the aforesaid, in the interest of justice, delay of
17 days in filing the present criminal appeal is condoned.
Application stands disposed of.
Cr. Appeal No._______/2025
Be registered.
Records be called for.
List the matter after ensuing winter vacation in the month
of April, 2025. In the meanwhile, power of attorney on behalf of
the respondent be filed.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 08, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Rangila Ram vs. State of HP
Cr.MP No.1454 of 2024 in Cr.MP(M) No.141 of 2024
.
08.01.2025 Present: Mr. Devender K. Sharma, Advocate, for the non-applicant/
petitioner.
Mr. R.S. Verma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
Ms. Chetna Thakur, Advocate, for the applicant/
complainant.
ASI Chaman Lal, I/O Police Station, Sarkaghat, District
Mandi, Himachal Pradesh, is present along with record. Status
report stands filed. The same is taken on record. Copy, whereof,
has been supplied to learned counsel for the parties, who intend
to go through the same.
Learned counsel for the non-applicant/petitioner seeks
time to place on record certain documents. Let the needful be
done on or before the next date of hearing.
List the matter after ensuing winter vacation in the second
week of March, 2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 08, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Rohit Kumar and others vs. Nurma
CMPMO No.643 of 2024
.
08.01.2025 Present: Mr. Vinod Sharma and Ms. Mamta Bhatwan, Advocates,
for the petitioners.
Mr. Rajesh Kumar Parmar, Advocate, for the respondent.
Learned counsel for the parties jointly submit that the
arrears of maintenance, as on date, is approximately Rs.70,000/-.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the aforesaid
amount shall be paid to the respondent within a month from
today.
List the matter after ensuing winter vacation in the third
week of March, 2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 08, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Dinesh Kumar vs. R.K. Enterprises
Criminal Revision No.606 of 2024
.
08.01.2025 Present: Mr. Bonit Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
In terms of judgment dated 02.12.2024, the compounding
fee, in the case at hand to the tune of Rs.9,777/- (15% of the
cheque amount) stands deposited by the petitioner before the
Himachal Pradesh State Legal Services Authority, Shimla, on
06.01.2025. In this respect, a receipt has been shown to the
Court. The same is seen and returned to the counsel for the
petitioner.
In view thereof, present proceedings are closed.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 08, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Sudershan Kumar vs. State of HP
Criminal Appeal No.216 of 2024
.
08.01.2025 Present: Ms. Tamanna, Advocate, vice Mr. Arush Matlotia,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. R.S. Verma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
Cr.MP No.1681/2024
Further time prayed for removing the objections in the
rejoinder filed by the applicant.
Let the needful be done on or before the next date of
hearing.
List the matter for consideration after ensuing winter
vacation in the first week of March, 2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 08, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Parkash Chand vs. Hardyal Singh and others
CMPMO No.45 of 2024
.
08.01.2025 Present: Mr. Divya Raj Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Gaurav Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 6.
CMP No.1270/2024
Reply, as prayed, be filed on or before the next date of
hearing.
List the matter for consideration after ensuing winter
vacation in the second week of March, 2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 08, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Naresh Rana vs. State of HP and others
Cr.MMO No.852 of 2024
.
07.01.2025 Present: Mr. Ashir Kaith, Advocate, vice Mr. Hamender Singh
Chandel, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Manish Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for
respondents No.1 & 2/State.
Mr. H.M. Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. Rahil Mahajan,
Advocate, for respondents No.3.
Reply on behalf of respondents No.1 & 2, as prayed, be
filed within four weeks. Rejoinder, if any, be filed on or before the
next date of hearing.
List for consideration after ensuing winter vacation in the
fourth week of March, 2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 07, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Naresh Rana vs. State of HP and others
Cr.MMO No.852 of 2024
.
07.01.2025 Present: Mr. Ashir Kaith, Advocate, vice Mr. Hamender Singh
Chandel, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Manish Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for
respondents No.1 & 2/State.
Mr. H.M. Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. Rahil Mahajan,
Advocate, for respondents No.3.
Reply on behalf of respondents No.1 & 2, as prayed, be
filed within four weeks. Rejoinder, if any, be filed on or before the
next date of hearing.
List for consideration after ensuing winter vacation in the
fourth week of March, 2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 07, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Dila Ram vs. Chamkali Devi
Criminal Revision No.783 of 2024
.
07.01.2025 Present: Mr. G.D. Verma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sumit Sharma,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Rajneesh Maniktala, Senior Advocate with
Ms Bhushree Jai, Advocate, for the respondent.
Order dated 02.12.2024 stands complied with as requisite
compensation amount stands deposited and bail bonds stand
furnished to the satisfaction of learned Trial Court.
Record stands received. Learned counsel for the parties
intend to go through the same.
List on 10.04.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 07, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Dila Ram vs. Bimla Devi
Criminal Revision No.781 of 2024
.
07.01.2025 Present: Mr. G.D. Verma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sumit Sharma,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Rajneesh Maniktala, Senior Advocate with
Ms Bhushree Jai, Advocate, for the respondent.
Order dated 02.12.2024 stands complied with as requisite
compensation amount stands deposited and bail bonds stand
furnished to the satisfaction of learned Trial Court.
Record stands received. Learned counsel for the parties
intend to go through the same.
List on 10.04.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 07, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Virender Singh Dhanta vs. Chetan Verma
Criminal Revision No.698 of 2024
.
07.01.2025 Present: Mr. Sidharth, Advocate, vice Mr. Vinod Kumar Gupta,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Pranav Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. S.S. Roach,
Advocate, for the respondent.
Record stands received. Learned counsel for the parties
intend to go through the same.
List after ensuing winter vacation in the month of April,
2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 07, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Bela Devi vs. Rajiv Thakur
CMPMO No.694 of 2024
.
07.01.2025 Present: Mr. Ajay Chauhan, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. R.K. Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent.
Notice. Mr. R.K. Sharma, learned counsel, appears and
waives service of notice on behalf of the respondent and seeks
time to file reply.
Reply be filed within four weeks. Rejoinder, if any, on or
before the next date of hearing.
List on 04.03.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 07, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Bela Devi vs. Rajiv Thakur
CMPMO No.694 of 2024
.
07.01.2025 Present: Mr. Ajay Chauhan, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. R.K. Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent.
Notice. Mr. R.K. Sharma, learned counsel, appears and
waives service of notice on behalf of the respondent and seeks
time to file reply.
Reply be filed within four weeks. Rejoinder, if any, on or
before the next date of hearing.
List on 04.03.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 07, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Aman Singh @ Ammu vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Criminal Appeal No.491 of 2024
.
07.01.2025 Present: Mr. Rohit, Advocate, vice Mr. Arun Sehgal, Advocate, for
the appellant.
Mr. Manish Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant
submits that the arguing counsel is unavailable today on account
of personal difficulty.
List after ensuing winter vacation in the month of April,
2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 07, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Sapna Kumari vs. Brahmi Devi and others
CMPMO No.487 of 2024
.
07.01.2025 Present: Mr. Rajiv Sirkeck, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. H.M. Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. Rahil Mahajan,
Advocate, for respondent No.1.
CMPMO No.487/2024
Notice. Mr. H.M. Thakur, learned vice counsel, appears
seeks time to file reply.
r to
and waives service of notice on behalf of respondent No.1 and
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to
respondents No.2 and 3, returnable within four weeks.
Reply on behalf of respondent No.1 be filed within four
weeks. Rejoinder, if any, on or before the next date of hearing.
List the matter for consideration after ensuing winter
vacation in the second week of March, 2025.
CMP No.14193/2024
During pendency of the petition, further proceedings, in
case No.15/2022, titled Brahmi Devi vs. Sapna Kumari and
others, pending before learned Additional Chief Judicial
Magistrate Court, Palampur, District Kangra, H.P., shall remain
stayed. Application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 07, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Kunal Juneja vs. State of HP and another
Cr.MMO No.455 of 2024
.
07.01.2025 Present: Mr. Sambhav Bhasin, Advocate, vice Mr. Vasu Jal,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Manish Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for
respondent No.1/State.
Mr. Anubhav Chopra, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
No rejoinder is intended to be filed on behalf of the
petitioner to the reply filed on behalf of respondent No.1.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.2
seeks time to file reply.
Let the needful be done within four weeks. Rejoinder
thereto, if any, within four weeks thereafter. List after eight
weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 07, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
M/s Beat Route Cafe and Restaurant and another vs.
Rajan Chopra
Criminal Revision No.427 of 2024
.
07.01.2025 Present: Mr. Panku Chaudhary, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Cr.MP No.5143/2024
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is
allowed. Time to deposit the balance compensation amount
r to
(30%), as is being prayed, is granted. Let the needful be done
within eight weeks. Application stands disposed of.
Criminal Revision No.427/2024
List after eight weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 07, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Chaman Lal vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Criminal Appeal No.426 of 2024
.
07.01.2025 Present: Mr. Sudhir Bhatnagar, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Manish Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
Record stands received. Learned counsel for the parties
intend to go through the same.
2025.
r to
List after ensuing winter vacation in the month of April,
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 07, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Geeta Devi vs. The Commissioner, M.C. Shimla and
others
CMPMO No.347 of 2024
.
07.01.2025 Present: Mr. Ajay Kumar Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Chaman
Negi and Mr. Rohit, Advocates, for the petitioner.
Mr. Mukul Sood, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Ashok Kumar Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rajat,
Advocate, for respondents No.2 and 3.
Further time prayed for by the learned counsel appearing
on behalf of the Municipal Corporation to look into the proposal
submitted by the petitioner in terms of order dated 12.12.2024.
List on 10.03.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 07, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Chetan Sharma @ Mannu vs. State of H.P.
Cr. MP(M) No.2699 of 2024
.
06.01.2025 Present: Mr. Surender K. Sharma, Advocate as Legal Aid Counsel,
for the petitioner.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondent/State.
Respondent to ascertain as to whether bail has been
granted to the petitioner previously in FIR No.203 of 2019 dated
19.07.2019, registered at Police Station, Balh, District Mandi,
H.P.
List on 13.01.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Chetan Sharma @ Mannu vs. State of H.P.
Cr. MP(M) No.2699 of 2024
.
06.01.2025 Present: Mr. Surender K. Sharma, Advocate as Legal Aid Counsel,
for the petitioner.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondent/State.
Respondent to ascertain as to whether bail has been
granted to the petitioner previously in FIR No.203 of 2019 dated
19.07.2019, registered at Police Station, Balh, District Mandi,
H.P.
List on 13.01.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Mukesh Kumar vs. Jaimal Sharma
Cr. Revision No.571 of 2023
.
06.01.2025 Present: None for the petitioner.
Mr. Sat Parkash, Advocate, for the respondent.
Despite repeated calls, there is no appearance on behalf of
the petitioner. In the interest of justice, list for consideration on
12.03.2025.
In the meanwhile, petitioner is free to file an appropriate
application under Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act
for compounding of the offence, in the case at hand.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Hari Singh vs. State of HP and others
Cr.MMO No.815 of 2023
.
06.01.2025 Present: None for the petitioner.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondent/State.
Despite repeated calls, there is no appearance on behalf of
the petitioner. In the interest of justice, list for consideration after
r to
ensuing winter vacation in the fourth week of March, 2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Rakesh Sharma and another vs. State of HP and
others
Cr.MMO No.208 of 2024
.
06.01.2025 Present: Mr. Randeep S. Rai, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vikrant
Thakur, Mr. Sushant Vir Singh, Mr. Shubham Guleria, Mr.
Kanan Pathak and Ms. Rubina Virmani, Advocates, for the
petitioners.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondent/State.
Mr. Kashmir Singh Thakur, Advocate, for respondent
No.4/CBI.
Shri Shakti Singh, HPPPS (City), Shimla and ASI Chhotu
Ram, I/O Police Station, Boileauganj, District Shimla, is
present along with record.
Learned Additional Advocate General seeks adjournment
on the ground of non-availability of learned Advocate General.
List on 28.02.2025, on which date, the matter shall be
heard finally as pleadings in the case at hand are complete.
It is made clear that no further adjournment shall be
sought by the State.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Vineet Chauhan vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Cr.MMO No.425 of 2024
.
06.01.2025 Present: Ms. Tim Saran, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondent/State.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
rejoinder shall be filed by the petitioner during the course of the
day itself. r
List for consideration after ensuing winter vacation in the
fourth week of March, 2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Manish Kumar Sharma vs. State of HP and another
Cr.MP(M) No.59 of 2025
.
06.01.2025 Present: Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sparsh
Bhushan, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondent/State.
Notice. Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, learned Additional
Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on
behalf of the respondent-State. He prays for and is granted two
weeks’ time to file status report. On taking steps within three
days, let notice be issued to the complainant/victim, returnable for
the next date.
List on 21.01.2025, on which date, respondent/State shall
also file Status report.
The petitioner-accused apprehends his arrest in a case
registered against him vide FIR No.1 of 2025 dated 05.01.2025,
under Section 64 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita
(BNSS), 2023 at Women Police Station, Dharamshala, District
Kangra, Himachal Pradesh.
In view of the averments in the application and also the
submissions made by learned counsel, it is directed that in the
event of arrest of the petitioner-accused in this case, he shall be
released on bail subject to his furnishing personal bonds in the
sum of Rs. 25,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the
satisfaction of the arresting Police Officer/Investigating Officer,
subject to following conditions:-
(i) Petitioner, at the first instance, shall appear before
the Investigating Officer, Women Police Station,
Dharamshala, District Kangra, on 07.01.2025 at
11.30 a.m;
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
(ii) Petitioner shall join the investigation of case as and
when called for by the Investigating Officer in
accordance with law;
.
(iii). Petitioner shall not hamper the investigation in any
manner whatsoever;
(iv). Petitioner shall not contact the complainants,
threaten or browbeat them or to use any pressure
tactics in any manner whatsoever;
(v). Petitioner shall not leave India without prior
permission of the Court;
(vii). Petitioner shall not make any inducement threat or
promise, directly or indirectly, to the investigating
officer or any person acquainted with the facts of the
case to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts
to the Court or any Police Officer or tamper with the
evidence.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Sheela Devi vs. State of HP and another
Cr.MP(M) No.58 of 2025
.
06.01.2025 Present: Mr. Servedaman Rathore, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.1/State.
Notice. Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, learned Additional
Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on
behalf of respondent No.1-State. He prays for and is granted two
weeks’ time to file status report. On taking steps within three
days, issue notice to respondent No.2/complainant, returnable for
21.01.2025.
List on 21.01.2025, on which date, respondent/State shall
also file Status report.
The petitioner-accused apprehends her arrest in a case
registered against her vide FIR No.34 of 2024 dated 14.12.2024,
under Sections 363, 366A, 354 and 376 of the Indian Penal Code
and Sections 6 and 17 of the Protection of Children from Sexual
Offences Act (POCSO) at Women Police Station, Nahan, District
Sirmaur, Himachal Pradesh.
In view of the averments in the application and also the
submissions made by learned counsel, it is directed that in the
event of arrest of the petitioner-accused in this case, she shall be
released on bail subject to her furnishing personal bonds in the
sum of Rs. 25,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the
satisfaction of the arresting Police Officer/Investigating Officer,
subject to following conditions:-
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
(i) Petitioner, at the first instance, shall appear before
the Investigating Officer, Women Police Station,.
Nahan, District Sirmaur, on 07.01.2025 at 11.30 a.m;
(ii) Petitioner shall join the investigation of case as and
when called for by the Investigating Officer in
accordance with law;
(iii). Petitioner shall not hamper the investigation in any
manner whatsoever;
(iv). Petitioner shall not contact the complainants,
threaten or browbeat them or to use any pressure
tactics in any manner whatsoever;
(v). Petitioner shall not leave India without prior
permission of the Court;
(vii). Petitioner shall not make any inducement threat or
promise, directly or indirectly, to the investigating
officer or any person acquainted with the facts of the
case to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts
to the Court or any Police Officer or tamper with the
evidence.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Sudesh Sood and another vs. Abhishek Vashisht and
another
CMPMO No.111 of 2024
.
06.01.2025 Present: Mr. Abhinav Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. Ajay Kumar
Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Pranjal
Munjal, Advocate, for the respondents.
At the joint request of learned counsel for the parties, list
the matter for consideration after ensuing winter vacation in the
second week of March, 2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Raja vs. Himachal Pradesh Minorities Finance &
Development Corporation
Criminal Revision No.66 of 2024
.
06.01.2025 Present: Mr. Gurdev Negi, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms. Shashi Kiran, Advocate, for the respondent.
Further time prayed for depositing the balance
compensation amount of Rs.1.06 lacs.
Let the needful be done on or before the next date of
hearing. List the matter after ensuing winter vacation in the
second week of March, 2025.
On deposit of the balance compensation amount, petitioner
is free to file an appropriate application under Section 147 of the
Negotiable Instruments Act for compounding of the offence, in
the case at hand.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Satish Kumar vs. Arun Kumar
Criminal Revision No.35 of 2024
.
06.01.2025 Present: Mr. N.K. Tomar, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms. Drishti Sirswal, Advocate, for the respondent.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent
submits that today the respondent has received a sum of
Rs.30,000/- towards discharge of compensation amount as
fastened by the Courts below.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the balance
amount shall be deposited in the Registry of this Court on or
before the next date of hearing.
Other than the aforesaid, learned counsel for the petitioner
submits that Rs.24,000/- is lying deposited before the trial Court.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner would have no objection if an appropriate application is
filed by the respondent/complainant for release of amount
deposited before the trial Court.
List the matter after ensuing winter vacation in the second
week of March, 2025.
On deposit of the balance compensation amount,
petitioner is free to file an appropriate application under Section
147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for compounding of the
offence, in the case at hand.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Gurdarshan Singh Bindra vs. Shashi Bala and others
Civil Revision No.18 of 2024
.
06.01.2025 Present: Mr. Sumit Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. B.C. Verma,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Parmod Singh Thakur, Advocate, for respondents
No.1, 2(i) to 2(iii).
Further time prayed for inspection of the record by learned
vice counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner.
As prayed, list the matter for consideration after ensuing
winter vacation in the first week of March, 2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Narpat Ram vs. Rajeshwari Devi and others a/w
connected matter
CMPMO No.606 of 2023 a/w
.
Cr.MMO No.1166 of 2023
06.01.2025 Present: Mr. Virender Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner in
CMPMO No.606 of 2023 and for the respondent in
Cr.MMO No.1166 of 2023.
Mr. Anirudh Sharma, Advocate, for respondents in
CMPMO No.606 of 2023 and for the petitioner in Cr.MMO
No.1166 of 2023.
r to
At the joint request of learned counsel for the parties, list
the matter for consideration after ensuing winter vacation in the
fourth week of March, 2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Damodar Dass and others vs. Drompti Devi and others
CMPMO No.388 of 2023
.
06.01.2025 Present: Mr. Jagat Pal and Mr. Ashok K. Sharma, Advocates, for te
petitioners.
Mr. H.S. Rangra, Advocate, for respondents No.1 & 2.
At the request of learned counsel for the petitioner, list the
matter for consideration after ensuing winter vacation in the
r to
fourth week of March, 2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Ramesh Kumar vs. Savitri Verma a/w connected
matter
Civil Revision No.121 of 2023
.
Civil Revision No.122 of 2023
06.01.2025 Present: Mr. Anuj Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioners, in both the
petitions.
Mr. Vaibhav Tanwar, Advocate, for the respondents, in
both the petitions.
CMP No.16351/2024 in Civil Revision No.121/2023
CMP No.16353/2024 in Civil Revision No.122/2023
The parties, in the case at hand, are agreeable to a sum of
Rs.5,000/- as use and occupation charges for the premises in
question from the date of eviction.
In view thereof, let the arrears of use and occupation
charges from the date of eviction, less the amount already paid,
be deposited, on or before the next date of hearing.
The petitioner(s) shall pay the use and occupation charges
from the month of January, 2025 onward till the disposal of the
petition.
List on 15.04.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Govinder Singh and others vs. State of HP
Cr.MMO No.387 of 2022
.
06.01.2025 Present: Mr. Deepak Kaushal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Aditya
Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Manish Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
At the joint request of learned counsel for the petitioner,
list the matter for consideration after ensuing winter vacation in
the first week of April, 2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Kashmir Singh vs. State of H.P. and others
CMPMO No.190 of 2023
.
06.01.2025 Present: Mr. P.S. Goverdhan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rakesh
Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondents No.1&2/State.
Mr. Malay Kaushal, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
CMP No.22241/2024 & CMP No.238/2025
applicant.
r to
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
For the reasons stated in the applications, the same are
allowed, as all that is sought to be placed on record are the
photocopies of the orders passed by the Collector and the
Divisional Commissioner. Copies of the orders which are
appended thereto are ordered to be taken on record.
Insofar as order dated 17.02.2020, passed by the
Collector, Sub Division, Ghumarwin, District Bilaspur, is
concerned, certified copy of the same is appended with CMP
No.238 of 2025. The same is ordered to be taken on record, as it
is complete, in all respects, instead of copy appended with CMP
No.22241/2024.
CMPMO No.190/2023
At the joint request of learned counsel for the parties, list
the matter for consideration after ensuing winter vacation in the
first week of April, 2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
State of HP vs. Chaman Lal and another a/w connected
matter
Cr. Appeal No.468 of 2016 a/w
.
Cr. Revision No.202 of 2015
Cr. Appeal No.468 of 2016
06.01.2025 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
appellant/State.
Mr. Dibender Ghosh, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Cr. Revision No.202 of 2015
Mr. Dibender Ghosh, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
Cr. Appeal No.468 of 2016
Bailable warrants issued against respondent No.2, in the
case at hand, are to be executed through the Ministry of Home
Affairs. Report in this respect be awaited further by four weeks.
List thereafter.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Arun Bhardwaj @ Ambu vs. State of H.P.
Cr.MMO No.11 of 2025
.
06.01.2025 Present: Mr. Ashwani Kaundal, Advocate, for the petitioner.
At the request of learned counsel for the petitioner, list the
matter after ensuing winter vacation in the first week of March,
2025.
January 06, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Babrik Veer Singh vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Cr.MP(M) No.45 of 2025
.
06.01.2025 Present: Mr. Raman Prashar, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
Notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate
General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the
file status report.
r to
respondent-State. He prays for and is granted four weeks’ time to
List on 07.02.2025, on which date, respondent/State shall
also file Status report.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Suraj Gupta vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Cr.MP(M) No.43 of 2025
.
06.01.2025 Present: Mr. Surya Chauhan, Advocate, vice Mr. Sarthak Mehta,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
Notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate
General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the
respondent-State. He prays for and is granted four weeks’ time to
file status report.
List on 07.02.2025, on which date, respondent/State shall
also file Status report.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Asha Sharma vs. Niraml Thakur
Criminal Revision No.11 of 2025
.
06.01.2025 Present: Mr. Mohar Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Criminal Revision No.11/2025
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the
respondent, returnable within four weeks.
Cr.MP No.90/2025
The applicant-petitioner has preferred the present petition
against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated
13.05.2024, passed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Shimla,
District Shimla., H.P. (hereinafter referred to as ‘the trial Court’),
in Complaint (CIS Reg.) No.1171/2018, titled Nirmal Thakur vs.
Asha Sharma, and affirmed by learned Sessions Judge, Shimla,
Distrirct Shimla, H.P. in Criminal Appeal No. 65-S/10 of 2024,
titled Asha Sharma vs. Nirmal Thakur, decided on 09.09.2024.
The Revision Petition filed raises arguable points. Hence, the
sentence in the case at hand, is ordered to be suspended,
subject to the petitioner depositing 50% of the compensation
amount, if not already deposited, before the Trial Court within
four weeks from today and also subject to his furnishing a
personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with one surety in the
like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court,
undertaking therein that petitioner will attend this Court as and
when required and in case of dismissal of the revision petition, he
will immediately surrender before the learned trial Court to
receive the sentence. A copy of this order be sent to the
learned trial Court with the direction that the report of compliance
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
of this order be submitted to this Court within a period of six
.
weeks.
The application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
r to
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Rajesh Kumar @ Girijesh Kumar vs. Yogesh Kumar
and another
Criminal Revision No.9 of 2025
.
06.01.2025 Present: Ms. Ritu Raj Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.2/State.
Criminal Revision No.9/2025
Notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate
General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of
respondent No.2. On taking steps within three days, issue notice
to respondent No.1, returnable within four weeks.
Cr.MP No.77/2025
The applicant-petitioner has preferred the present petition
against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated
22.05.2024, passed by learned Additional Chief Judicial
Magistrate, Court No.1, Mandi, District Mandi, H.P. (hereinafter
referred to as ‘the trial Court’), in Complaint No.450-III/18/13,
titled Yogesh Kumar vs. Rajesh Kumar @ Girijesh, and affirmed
by learned Sessions Judge, Mandi, District Mandi, H.P. in
Criminal Appeal No. 74 of 2024, titled Rajesh Kumar @ Girijesh
Kumar vs. Yogesh Kumar and another, decided on 08.11.2024.
The Revision Petition filed raises arguable points. Hence, the
sentence in the case at hand, is ordered to be suspended,
subject to the petitioner depositing 50% of the compensation
amount, if not already deposited, before the Trial Court within
four weeks from today and also subject to his furnishing a
personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with one surety in the
like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court,
undertaking therein that petitioner will attend this Court as and
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
when required and in case of dismissal of the revision petition, he
.
will immediately surrender before the learned trial Court to
receive the sentence. A copy of this order be sent to the
learned trial Court with the direction that the report of compliance
of this order be submitted to this Court within a period of six
weeks.
The application stands disposed of.
r ( Bipin C. Negi )
January 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Savitru vs. Yuv Raj and others
CMPMO No.7 of 2025
.
06.01.2025 Present: Ms. Reeta Hingmang, Advocate, for the petitioner.
At the request of learned counsel for the petitioner, the
matter is adjourned enabling her to prepare the case.
List on 14.01.2025.
January 06, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Jaswant Singh vs. State of HP and another
Cr.MMO No.7 of 2025
.
06.01.2025 Present: Mr. Dibender Ghosh, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.1/State.
Cr.MMO No.7/2025 & Cr.MP No.67/2025
Notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate
General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of
respondent No.1. On taking steps within three days, issue notice
to respondent No.2, returnable within four weeks. Reply, if any,
be filed within six weeks. Rejoinder thereto, if any be filed on or
before the next date of hearing.
List the matter after ensuing winter vacation in the first
week of March, 2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Raj Kumar and others vs. State of HP and others
Cr.MMO No.5 of 2025
.
06.01.2025 Present: Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.1/State.
Mr. Ashwani Negi, Advocate, for respondents No.2 to 5.
Cr.MMO No.5/2025
Notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate
General and Mr. Ashwani Negi, learned counsel, appear and
waive service of notice on behalf of respondent No.1 and
respondents No.2 to 5, respectively and seek time to file
reply/status report.
List for presence of parties on 04.03.2025, on which date,
status report/reply be filed.
Cr.MP No.64/2025
Learned counsel for the petitioners states that he is under
instructions not to press this application, at this stage.
Accordingly, the instant application is dismissed as not pressed.
The application stands disposed of.
Cr.MP No.65/2025
Allowed and the applicants are exempted from filing
complete typed English translation of Annexures P-1 and P-3
(colly.) annexed with the accompanying petition, at this stage,
subject to filing of the same within seven days, as and when
directed to do so.
The application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Ravi Sharma vs. M/s Sanya Enterprises and others
CMPMO No.4 of 2025
.
06.01.2025 Present: Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner.
CMPMO No.4/2025 & CMP No.484/2025
Notice, at this stage, confined to respondent No.1 only be
issued, returnable within four weeks. Stpes be taken withn three
days.
r ( Bipin C. Negi )
January 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Sanjay Kumar vs. Charanji Lal and others
Civil Revision No.203 of 2024
.
06.01.2025 Present: Mr. Devinder K. Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Civil Revision No.203/2024 & CMP No.26142/2024
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the
respondents, returnable within four weeks.
January 06, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Parvesh Soni vs. Surinder Singh
Cr.MMO No.1248 of 2024
.
06.01.2025 Present: Mr. Vinod Chauhan, Advocate, for the petitioner.
At the request of learned counsel for the petitioner, list the
matter after ensuing winter vacation in the first week of March,
2025.
However, it is made clear that mere pendency of this
petition before this Court would not preclude the trial Court from
proceeding further. No notice has been issued to the respondent,
in the case at hand, till date.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Kiran Kumar vs. Anju Kumari
CMPMO No.22 of 2024
.
06.01.2025 Present: Mr. Vinod Chauhan, Advocate, vice Mr. Mohan Sharma,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
In terms of order dated 10.01.2024, before any notices
were issued, petitioner was directed to deposit the litigation cost
of Rs.15,000/-. However, the same has not been deposited till
date.
Let the same be deposited on or before the next date of
hearing. List on 05.03.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 06, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
M/s Janta Cloth House (Partnership firm) and another
vs. Rakesh Kapoor and others
.
Civil Revision No.48 of 2019.
04.01.2025 Present: Mr. Rocky, Advocate, vice Mr. Devinder K. Sharma,
Advocate, for the petitioners/non-applicants.
Mr. Anirudh Kapoor, Advocate, vice Mr. Vivek Sharma,
Advocate, for the respondents/applicants in CMP
No.14149 of 2024.
CMP No.14149/2024
Time for filing reply is being sought since 21.08.2024.
However, the same has not been filed till date.
Let the reply, as prayed, be positively filed within four
weeks. It is made clear that if the reply is not filed within four
weeks, then the right to file reply shall automatically stand closed.
Rejoinder, if any, thereto be filed on or before the next
date of hearing. List on 13.03.2024.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 04, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Mohammed Raffi vs. HPMFDC
Criminal Revision No.157 of 2023
.
04.01.2025 Present: None for the petitioner.
Mr. Sat Prakash, Advocate, for the respondent.
Despite repeated calls, there is no appearance on behalf
of the petitioner. In the interest of justice, list the matter on
07.01.2025.
r ( Bipin C. Negi )
January 04, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Municipal Corporation, Shimla vs. Om Prakash Kapoor
CMPMO No.295 of 2012
.
04.01.2025 Present: Mr. Mukul Sood, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Basant Pal Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.1(a).
Let fresh steps for the service of respondents No.1(b) and
1(c) be taken within one week. On taking such steps, issue
notice the said respondents, returnable within four weeks.
r ( Bipin C. Negi )
January 04, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Paras Ram Chandel vs. Pramod Sood
Criminal Revision No.416 of 2022
.
04.01.2025 Present: Mr. Vishvender, Advocate, vice Mr. K.B. Khajuria, Advocate
as Legal Aid Counsel, for the petitioner.
Mr. Dewanand Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent.
At the request of learned counsel for the petitioner, list the
matter on 06.01.2025.
January 04, 2025 (KS)
to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Om Singh Rajput and another vs. State of HP and
others
Cr.MMO No.1202 of 2024
.
04.01.2025 Present: Mr. Rahul Mahajan, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.1/State.
Ms. Meera Devi, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
Status report stands filed. The same is taken on record.
Copy, whereof, has been supplied to learned counsel for the
petitioners.
Reply, as prayed, be filed on behalf of respondent No.2 on
or before the next date of hearing. On taking fresh steps within
three days, issue notice to respondent No.3, returnable for
05.03.2025.
Pleadings be completed in the meanwhile.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 04, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Bittu vs. State of HP
Cr. MP(M) No.2728 of 2024
.
04.01.2025 Present: Mr. Sanjay Ranta, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
Status report stands filed. The same is taken on record.
Copy, whereof, has been supplied to learned counsel for the
petitioner, who intends to go through the same.
List for consideration, on 13.01.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 04, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Joginder Lal vs. Seema Kashyap
Cr. MP(M) No.2700 of 2024
04.01.2025 Present: Mr. Pavinder, Advocate, for the applicant/appellant.
.
Mr. Ravi Patiyal, Advocate, for the respondent.
Cr.MP(M) No.2700/2024
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
applicant/respondent.
From the reasons and sufficient cause shown in the
application, it is evident that the applicant was due diligently, bona
fidely, pursuing remedies available to him under law. No inaction is
attributable to the applicant on account of the explanation offered in
the application for getting the delay of 102 days in filing the appeal
condoned.
Other than the aforesaid, in the interest of justice, delay of
102 days in filing the present criminal appeal is condoned.
Application stands disposed of.
Cr.MP No._______/2025
From perusal of the grounds of appeal, it is evident that there
exists an arguable case in favour of the present applicant. In view
thereof and for the reasons stated in the application, the same is
allowed. Leave to appeal is granted. The application stands
disposed of.
Cr. Appeal No._______/2025
Be registered.
Records be called for.
List the matter after ensuing winter vacation in the third
week of March, 2025. In the meanwhile, power of attorney on
behalf of the respondent be filed.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 04, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
.
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Rajinder Kumar vs. Chaya Devi and others a/w
connected matter
Civil Revision No.2 of 2016 a/w
Civil Revision No.27 of 2021
.
Civil Revision No.2 of 2016
03.01.2025 Present: Ms. Meera Devi, Advocate, vice Mr. Deepak Gupta,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Sumit Sood, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 4.
None for respondents No.5 to 7.
Mr. Tek Chand Sharma, Advocate, for the applicant in
CMP No.4708 of 2024.
Civil Revision No.27 of 2021
Ms. Meera Devi, Advocate, vice Mr. Deepak Gupta,
Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Atul G. Sood, Advocate, for the respondents.
CMP No.4708/2024 in Civil Revision No.2 of 2016
The present application has been filed under Order 1 Rule
10 read with Section 151 of the Civil Procedure Code seeking
impleadment of the applicant. The impleadment is sought on the
ground that during the pendency of the proceedings, a share has
been purchased by the applicant in the property in question, on
29.12.2007 and 30.11.2021.
Admittedly, in the case at hand, proceedings were
instituted on 27.05.1998. The petition had been filed on the
ground of bona fide requirement and cease to occupy. The
present application has been filed by one Sh. Kartik Kumar, who
seeks to be impleaded in the present proceedings by virtue of the
present application. In this context, it would be appropriate to
mention that a similar application had been filed by Sh. Kartik
Kumar before the learned trial Court. The said application had
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
been dismissed by the trial Court on 22.12.2009. The said order
.
has attained finality as the same was never challenged.
The well-settled principles, as to what has to be
adjudicated in a rent petition, have been succinctly enumerated in
case reported as 2018 (2) SCC 352, titled Kanaklata Das & Ors.
Vs. Naba Kumar Das & Ors. The relevant extract, whereof, is
being reproduced herein below:-
“11.2 Second, the landlord (plaintiff) in such suit is
required to plead and prove only two things to enable him
to claim a decree for eviction against his tenant from the
tenanted suit premises. First, there exists a relationship of
the landlord and tenant between the plaintiff and the
defendant and second, the ground(s) on which theplaintiff- landlord has sought defendant’s-tenant’s eviction
under the Rent Act exists. When these two things are
proved, eviction suit succeeds.
11.3 Third, the question of title to the suit premises is not
germane for the decision of the eviction suit. The reason
being, if the landlord fails to prove his title to the suit
premises but proves the existence of relationship of thelandlord and tenant in relation to the suit premises and
further proves existence of any ground on which the
eviction is sought under the Tenancy Act, the eviction suit
succeeds. Conversely, if the landlord proves his title to
the suit premises but fails to prove the existence of
relationship of the landlord and tenant in relation to the
suit premises, the eviction suit fails. (See- Ranbir Singh
vs. Asharfi Lal).”
From the aforesaid, it is evident that all that is to be
determined in an eviction petition is the existence of relationship
of landlord and tenant between the parties and the ground on
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
which the landlord has sought eviction under the Rent Act. The
.
question of title is not germane to the eviction suit.
On filing of eviction petition rights of the parties have been
crystallized on the date of the eviction suit and the entitlement of
the co-owners to seek ejectment must be adjudged by reference
to the date of institution of the suit. The only exception being
when by virtue of a subsequent event the entitlement of the body
of co-owners to eject the tenant comes to an end by act of parties
or by operation of law. One co-owner filing a suit for eviction
against the tenant does so on his own behalf in his own right and
as an agent of the other co-owners. Having purchased the
property pendente lite, the applicant cannot be allowed to take a
stand contrary to one taken by his predecessors-in-interest and to
the prejudice of the landlord whose rights the applicant has not
purchased. In this respect, reference can be made to decision of
the Hon’ble Apex Court in India Umbrella Manufacturing Co.
and others vs. Bhagabandei Agarwalla (dead) by LRs. Savitri
Agarwalla (Smt) and others, 2004 (3) SCC 178.
Other than the aforesaid, the landlord is the dominus litus
and he cannot be forced to add parties against whom he does not
seek any relief, unless it is the compulsion of any rule of law. The
judgment passed, in the case at hand, is the judgment in
personam and not a judgment in rem. The same pertains only to
the parties to the suit and not to persons who are not parties to
the suit. Besides the aforesaid, the presence of the applicant is
not necessary to enable the Court to effectively and completely
adjudicate the question which arise for consideration.
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
In view of the aforesaid, there is no merit in the present
.
application and the same is dismissed.
Civil Revision No.02/2016 & Civil Revision No.27/2021
At the joint request of learned counsel for the parties, list the
matter after ensuing winter vacation in the second week of
March, 2025.
January 03, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Raj Kumar vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Cr. MMO No.60 of 2021
.
03.01.2025 Present: Mr. Ashok Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sahil
Malhotra, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. R.P. Singh, Deputy Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks time to file
rejoinder.
Let the needful be done on or before the next date of
hearing. List on 07.01.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 03, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Inderdeep Singh Khurana and another vs. State of HP
and others a/w concerned matter
Cr. MMO No.1157 of 2023 a/w
.
Cr. MMO No.1156 of 2023
03.01.2025 Present: Mr. Hamender Singh Chandel, Advocate, for the
petitioners, in both the petitions.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondents No.1&2/State.
Mr. Bhanvi Negi, Advocate, vice Mr. Manish Sharma,
Advocate, for respondent No.3.
At the joint request of learned counsel for the parties, list
the matter after ensuing winter vacation in the second week of
March, 2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 03, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Sukh Dev vs. Sarwan Kumar and others
Cr. Appeal No.457 of 2024
.
03.01.2025 Present: Mr. Raju Ram Rahi, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Sidharth, Advocate, vice Mr. Vinod Kumar Gupta,
Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 5.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.6/State.
List along with Cr.MP(M) No.2265 of 2024 (Criminal
Appeal Filing No.10350 of 2024).
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 03, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Jai Ram Madhaik and others vs. State of HP and
another
Cr. MMO No.295 of 2024
.
03.01.2025 Present: Mr. Rajul Chauhan, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.1/State.
Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
At the joint request of learned counsel for the parties, list
the matter after ensuing winter vacation in the fourth week of
March, 2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 03, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Surat Ram Verma vs. Daulat Ram
Cr. Appeal No.284 of 2024
.
03.01.2025 Present: Mr. Mohar Chand, Advocate, vice Mr. Ravinder Singh
Jaswal, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Mohan Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent.
At the joint request of learned counsel for the parties, list
the matter after ensuing winter vacation in the fourth week of
March, 2025.
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
January 03, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Yogesh Rolta vs. State of HP and others
Cr.MMO No.1151 of 2023
.
03.01.2025 Present: Mr. Mukul Sood, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.1/State.
Mr. Parikshit, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
Mr. Anuj Gupta, Advocate, for respondents No.3 to 8.
Further time prayed for filing rejoinder.
Let the needful be done on or before the next date of
hearing. As prayed, list the matter after ensuing winter vacation in
the second week of March, 2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 03, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Anupam Thakur vs. State of HP and another
Cr.MMO No.1020 of 2023
.
03.01.2025 Present: Mr. Anubhav Chopra, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.1/State.
Mr. Ashwani Negi, Advocate, vice Mr. Sumit Raj Sharma,
Advocate, for respondent No.2.
Learned counsel for respondent No.2 submits that the
arguing counsel is unavailable today on account of personal
difficulty. He seeks an adjournment.
As prayed, list the matter after ensuing winter vacation in
the second week of March, 2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 03, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
M/s Salus Pharmaceuticals and others vs. Union of
India a/w connected matter
Cr.MMO No.929 of 2023 a/w
.
Cr.MMO No.930 of 2023
03.01.2025 Present: Mr. Anuj Nag, Advocate, for the petitioners, in both the
petitions.
Mr. Shashi Shirshoo, Central Government Counsel, for the
respondent/Union of India, in both the petitions.
Further time prayed for on behalf of the petitioner to
prepare the case at hand.
As prayed, list the matter after ensuing winter vacation in
the second week of March, 2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 03, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Prem Singh vs. Rakesh Kumar
Criminal Revision No.631 of 2023
.
03.01.2025 Present: Mr. D.S. Nainta, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate, vice Mr. Sanjay Ranta,
Advocate, for the respondent.
Order dated 15.10.2024 has not been complied with till
date.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that an
appropriate application under Section 147 of the Negotiable
Instruments Act for compounding of the offence, in the case at
hand, stands filed. However, the same is not on record.
Registry to trace the application and place it on record well
before the next date of hearing post removal of objection(s), if
any.
List on 06.01.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 03, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Shiv Kumar vs. Pratap Singh
Criminal Revision No.457 of 2023
.
03.01.2025 Present: Mr. Rajiv Rai and Ms. Rajni Gandhi, Advocates, for the
petitioner.
Mr. Bhag Chand Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent.
At the joint request of learned counsel for the parties, list
on 07.01.2025.
Learned counsel for the petitioner to ensure that the
balance compensation amount is deposited on or before the next
date of hearing.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 03, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Yogesh Kumar and others vs. Adarsh Bala
CMPMO No.445 of 2023
.
03.01.2025 Present: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Atharv
Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Sunny Modgill, Advocate, for the respondent.
Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the
previous order stands complied with as copies of the ordersheets
been filed.
r to
of the proceedings before the trial Court after 09.12.2023 have
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he has
received the copy of the same. However, the same are not on
record.
Registry to trace the same and place them on record well
before the next date of hearing post removal of objection(s), if
any.
As prayed, list the matter after ensuing winter vacation in
the second week of March, 2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 03, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Brahma Nand and others vs. Chunni Lal and others
Civil Revision No.106 of 2023
.
03.01.2025 Present: Ms. Rinki Kashmiri, Advocate, vice Mr. Janesh Gupta,
Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Surya Chauhan, Advocate, for the respondents.
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the
arguing counsel is unavailable today on account of personal
difficulty. He seeks an adjournment.
As prayed, list the matter after ensuing winter vacation in
the second week of March, 2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 03, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Prem Chand vs. Kanta Devi
Civil Revision No.142 of 2022
.
03.01.2025 Present: Mr. Rajiv Rai and Ms. Rajni Gandhi, Advocates, for the
petitioner.
Mr. Aman Parth Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that they need
time to reconstruct their file as their file has been misplaced.
hearing.
r to
Let the needful be done on or before the next date of
List the matter for consideration after ensuing winter
vacation in the second week of March, 2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 03, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Dharam Singh vs. H.P. State Cooperative Bank a/w
connected matter
Criminal Revision No.311 of 2024 a/w
.
Criminal Revision No.312 of 2024
02.01.2025 Present: None for the petitioner(s).
Mr. Kunal Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. Parmod Singh
Thakur, Advocate, for the respondent(s).
Despite repeated calls, there is no appearance on behalf
of the petitioner.
In the interest of justice, list the matter for
consideration after ensuing winter vacation in the second week
of March, 2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 02, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Dharam Singh vs. H.P. State Cooperative Bank a/w
connected matter
.
Criminal Revision No.311 of 2024 a/w
Criminal Revision No.312 of 2024
02.01.2025 Present: None for the petitioner(s).
Mr. Kunal Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. Parmod Singh
Thakur, Advocate, for the respondent(s).
Despite repeated calls, there is no appearance on behalf
of the petitioner.
r In the interest of justice, list the matter for
consideration after ensuing winter vacation in the second week
of March, 2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 02, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Manju Devi vs. Sunil Kumar
CMPMO No.741 of 2024
.
02.01.2025 Present: Mr. H.S. Rangra, Advocate, for the petitioner.
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the
respondent, returnable within four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 02, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Ajay Sharma vs. Rajinder Singh
Cr. Revision No.135 of 2024
.
02.01.2025 Present: Mr. Gurinder Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Piyush Dhanotia, Advocate, for the respondent.
Record stands received. Learned counsel for the parties
intend to go through the same.
List the matter for consideration after ensuing winter
vacation in the fourth week of March, 2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 02, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Jahir Abbaskhan and another vs. State of HP and
another
Cr. MMO No.747 of 2023
.
02.01.2025 Present: Ms. Sangeeta Vasudeva, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. R.P. Singh, Deputy Advocate General, for respondent
No.1/State.
Mr. Gurmeet Bhardwaj, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
Learned counsel for respondent No.2 submits that in
pursuance to FIR No.130 dated 24.08.2020, proceedings have
been initiated and the matter is now listed for recording of
evidence before learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jawali, District
Kangra.
In view thereof, list the matter for consideration after
ensuing winter vacation in the second week of March, 2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 02, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Rajendera Kumar Gupta vs. Manoj Joshi and others
Cr. MMO No.269 of 2023
.
02.01.2025 Present: Ms. Ruchika Khachi, Advocate, vice Mr. C.D. Negi,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Trigun Singh Negi, Advocate, vice Ms. Kusum
Chaudhary, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Ms. Hemkanta Kaushal, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
Mr. K.B. Khajuria, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
Mr. Harsh Sharol, Advocate, vice Mr. Manoj Pathak,
Advocate, for respondent No.4.
Learned vice counsel appearing on behalf of respondent
No.1 submits that the arguing counsel is unavailable today on
account of bereavement in the family. He seeks an adjournment.
As prayed, list the matter after ensuing winter vacation in
the second week of March, 2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 02, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Taranjeet Kaur and another vs. State of Himachal
Pradesh and another
Cr. MMO No.383 of 2020
.
02.01.2025 Present: Mr. Ankit Dhiman, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.1/State.
Mr. Sidharth, Advocate, vice Mr. Vinod Kumar Gupta,
Advocate, for respondents No.2 to 4.
At the request of learned counsel for the petitioners, list
the matter for consideration after ensuing winter vacation in the
second week of March, 2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 02, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Tikam Singh vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Cr.MP(M) No.2676 of 2024
.
02.01.2025 Present: Mr. Ganesh Barowalia and Mr. Gambhir Singh Chauhan,
Advocates, for the petitioner.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondent/State.
List for consideration on 14.01.2025.
January 02, 2025 (KS)
to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Lal Singh vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Criminal Appeal No.499 of 2024
.
02.01.2025 Present: Mr. Narender Guleria, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondent/State.
ASI Narender Sharma, Police Station, Sadar, District
Mandi, Himachal Pradesh, is present along-with record.
Cr. Appeal No.499/2024 & Cr.MP No.4027/2024
At the request of learned counsel for the appellant, list the
matter for consideration after ensuing winter vacation in the
second week of March, 2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 02, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Jai Karan Kumar vs. UCO Bank
Criminal Revision No.447 of 2024
.
02.01.2025 Present: Mr. Mukul Sood, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Gaurav Kumar, Advocate, for the respondent.
Record of the trial Court be requisitioned well before the
next date of hearing.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on account
of loan liability, the respondent-Bank has sold the property of the
petitioner and, thus, recovered a sum of Rs.8.25 lacs. Insofar as
the balance amount is concerned, negotiations are in progress on
account of One Time Settlement (OTS) inter se petitioner/
accused and respondent/complainant, which according to learned
counsel for the parties, will bear fruit in the near future. As a
consequence whereof, list the matter for consideration after
ensuing winter vacation in the second week of March, 2025
along with Criminal Revision No.381 of 2024 .
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 02, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Chinmaya Educational Society vs. Registrar, Dr. Y.S.
Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry
.
CMPMO No.247 of 2024
02.01.2025 Present: Mr. J.S. Bhogal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Satish Sharma,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Ramesh Chand Sharma, Advocate, for the
respondents.
CMP No.7116/2024
Reply is stated to have been filed. However, the same is
not on record.
Registry to trace the same and place it on record well before
the next date of hearing post removal of objection(s), if any.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has
received copy of the reply and seeks time to file rejoinder thereto.
Pleadings in this respect be completed well before the next
date of hearing. List the matter after ensuing winter vacation in
the first week of March, 2025. Parties to ensure that the
pleadings are on record well before the next date of hearing.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 02, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Rashpal Singh vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Cr. Appeal No.184 of 2024
.
02.01.2025 Present: Mr. Khem Raj, Advocate, vice Mr. Vijender Katoch,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
Time to comply with order dated 26.04.2024 is extended
by one week. However, it is made clear that if the order is not
complied with within a period of one week from today, then
interim protection granted therein shall stand vacated without
further reference and the trial Court shall be free to execute the
order of sentence.
List in due course.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 02, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Daulat Ram vs. H.P. State Co-operative Agriculture &
Rural Development Bank and another
Cr. Revision No.80 of 2024
.
02.01.2025 Present: Mr. Parkash Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Narender Singh Thakur, Advocate, for the respondent.
At the request of learned counsel for the petitioner, list the
matter after ensuing winter vacation in the second week of
March, 2025, in order to enable the petitioner to deposit the
balance compensation amount in the Registry of this Court.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 02, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Mast Ram vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Cr.MP(M) No.14 of 2025
.
02.01.2025 Present: Mr. Karan Kapoor, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
the respondent/State.
The petitioner, who is present in person, has surrendered
before the jurisdiction of this Court and is identified by his
counsel.
Notice. Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, learned Additional
Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on
behalf of the respondent. He prays for and is granted four weeks’
time to file reply/status report.
List on 24.01.2025.
Prayer in this petition is for grant of bail in F.I.R. No.79 of
2024, dated 31.12.2024, registered at Police Station, Shillai,
District Sirmaur, H.P. for the commission of offences punishable
under Sections 3(1)(r)(s) of the Scheduled Castes and
Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and
Sections 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023
against the petitioner.
In the aforesaid facts and attending circumstances, the
bail-petitioner has submitted that he is innocent and has been
falsely implicated in the case at hand. Besides the aforesaid, he
has further submitted that he would not misuse the bail, in case
the same is granted and will not induce the witnesses or tamper
with the prosecution evidence.
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
In view of the aforesaid facts and attending circumstances,
.
the bail petitioner, who is aged 59 years and is permanent
resident of Block No.25 Sakhauli Ronhat, District Sirmaur,
Himachal Pradesh, as such, his presence can be secured in the
trial and, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by
sending him in custody, at this stage. Final opinion can be formed
after perusal of the record and status report. Therefore, it is
ordered that in the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released
on bail in the aforementioned FIR on his furnishing personal bond
in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only)
with one local surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the
learned Registrar/Additional Registrar (Judicial), subject to the
following conditions:
(i). The petitioner is directed to join the investigation on
03.01.2025 at 11:30 am at Police Station, Shillai, District
Sirmaur, H.P. He will also join investigation, as and when
called for by the Investigating Officer in accordance with
law.
(ii). The petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or
hamper the investigation in any manner whatsoever.
(iii). The petitioner shall not leave India without prior
permission of the Court.
(iv). The petitioner undertakes not to contact the
complainant, to threaten or browbeat her or to use any
pressure tactics in any manner whatsoever.
(v). The petitioner undertakes not to make any inducement, threat
or promise, directly or indirectly, to the Investigating Officer or
any person acquainted with the facts of the case to dissuade
him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court or any Police
Officer.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 02, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Ashok Kumar and another vs. Pushapa Devi
CMPMO No.483 of 2023
.
02.01.2025 Present: Mr. Mukul Sood, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Vinay Thakur, Advocate, for the respondent.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there is a
possibility of amicable settlement inter se the parties. In view
thereof, list the matter after ensuing winter vacation in the
second week of March, 2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 02, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Balinder vs. The Mahalaxmi Cooperative Credit
Society Ltd.
Cr. Revision No.589 of 2022
.
02.01.2025 Present: Mr. Suneet Verma, Advocate, vice Mr. Varun Rana,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms. Suchitra Sen, Advocate, for the respondent.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner
submits that an appropriate application under Section 147 of the
Negotiable Instruments Act for compounding of the offence, in the
case at hand, stands filed. However, the same is not on record.
Learned counsel for the respondent submits that she has received
copy of the same.
Registry to trace the application and place it on record well
before the next date of hearing post removal of objection(s), if any.
List on 08.01.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 02, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Narinder vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Cr. MP(M) No.8 of 2025
.
02.01.2025 Present: Mr. Kulbhushan Khajuria, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
Notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate
General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the
respondent-State.
List on 03.01.2025, on which date, respondent/State shall
also file Status report.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 02, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Prabhu Dayal vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Cr. MP(M) No.6 of 2025
.
02.01.2025 Present: Mr. Anirudh Sharma and Mr. Pavinder, Advocates, for the
petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
Notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate
General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the
respondent-State. He prays for and is granted three week’s time
to file status report .
List on 24.01.2025, on which date, respondent/State shall
also file Status report.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 02, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Rahul Thakur vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Cr. MP(M) No.5 of 2025
.
02.01.2025 Present: Mr. Anirudh Sharma and Mr. Pavinder, Advocates, for the
petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
Notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate
General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the
respondent-State. He prays for and is granted three week’s time
to file status report.
List on 24.01.2025, on which date, respondent/State shall
also file Status report.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 02, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Rahul vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Cr. Appeal No.6 of 2025
.
02.01.2025 Present: Mr. Naresh K. Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
Cr. Appeal No.6/2025
Admit.
Call for the records.
List for hearing in due course.
Cr.MP No.9/2025
By way of instant application filed under Section 430 of the
Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) 2023 , the applicant/
appellant is seeking suspension of sentence.
2. In the case at hand, the applicant was sentenced to undergo
simple imprisonment for a period of two years and to pay a fine of
Rs.5,000/- and in default of payment of fine, he was directed to
further undergo simple imprisonment for one month for the
commission of offence punishable under Section 354D of the Indian
Penal Code. Learned counsel further contended that the appeal is
likely to take considerable time for its disposal, as such, the instant
application may be allowed and the applicant be released on bail
during the pendency of the instant petition.
3. On the other hand, learned Additional Advocate General
contended that the applicant/appellant is not entitled to be released
on bail during the pendency of the present appeal, as he has been
convicted in a serious offence.
4. I have heard the learned counsel for the applicant/appellant
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
as well as learned Additional Advocate General and have also gone
.
through the material available on record.
5. The sentence imposed, in the case at hand, is fixed term
sentence. In this respect, it would be appropriate to refer to
judgment dated 05.07.2024 passed in SLP(Criminal) Diary
No.27298/2024, titled Bhupatji Sartajji Jabraji Thakor Vs. The
State of Gujarat. The relevant extract is being reproduced
hereinbelow:-
“There is a fine distinction between a sentence imposed
by the trial court for a fixed term and sentence life
imprisonment. If a sentence is for a fixed term, ordinarily,
the appellate court may exercise its discretion to suspend
the operation of the same liberally unless there are any
exceptional circumstances emerging from the record todecline. However, when it is a case of life imprisonment,
the only legal test which the Court should apply is to
ascertain whether there is anything palpable or apparenton the face of the record on the basis of which the court
can come to the conclusion that the conviction is notsustainable in law and that the convict has very fair
chances of succeeding in his appeal. For applying such
test, it is also not permissible for the court to undertakethe exercise of re-appreciating the evidence. The
emphasis is on the word “palpable” and the expression
“apparent on the face of the record”.
6. After perusing the record, it is evident that there are no
exceptional circumstances emerging thereof necessitating declining
of relief as is being sought.
7. The instant appeal is of the year 2025 and the same is not
likely to be decided in near future. Therefore, in view of the facts and
circumstances of the case and keeping in view of the aforesaid
judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court, the substantive sentence
imposed upon the applicant by the Trial Court vide judgment of
conviction and order of sentence dated 20.12.2024, passed by
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
learned Special Judge, Hamirpur, H.P., in POCSO Act No.18 of
.
2023, shall remain suspended, till final disposal of the appeal,
however, subject to the applicant’s furnishing personal bond in the
sum of Rs. 50,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the
satisfaction of learned Trial Court and also subject to deposit of the
fine amount, if not already deposited. On furnishing the requisite bail
bonds and on depositing the fine amount, he be released forthwith, if
not required in any other case, however, with the undertaking to
appear before this Court as and when directed and in the event of
the dismissal of the appeal, the applicant/appellant will surrender
before the Court.
8. However, it is made clear that the applicant shall not indulge
himself in the same crime and maintain good social behaviour, or
else, this order shall be liable to be cancelled.
9. Be it stated that any expression of opinion given in this order
does not mean an expression of opinion on the merits of the case
and the same has been given only for the purpose of deciding the
present application. The application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 02, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Rahul vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Cr. Appeal No.6 of 2025
.
02.01.2025 Present: Mr. Naresh K. Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
Cr. Appeal No.6/2025
Admit.
Call for the records.
Cr.MP No.9/2025
r to
List for hearing in due course.
By way of instant application filed under Section 430 of the
Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) 2023 , the applicant/
appellant is seeking suspension of sentence.
2. In the case at hand, the applicant was sentenced to undergo
simple imprisonment for a period of two years and to pay a fine of
Rs.5,000/- and in default of payment of fine, he was directed to
further undergo simple imprisonment for one month for the
commission of offence punishable under Section 354D of the Indian
Penal Code. Learned counsel further contended that the appeal is
likely to take considerable time for its disposal, as such, the instant
application may be allowed and the applicant be released on bail
during the pendency of the instant petition.
3. On the other hand, learned Additional Advocate General
contended that the applicant/appellant is not entitled to be released
on bail during the pendency of the present appeal, as he has been
convicted in a serious offence.
4. I have heard the learned counsel for the applicant/appellant
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
as well as learned Additional Advocate General and have also gone
through the material available on record.
.
5. The sentence imposed, in the case at hand, is fixed term
sentence. In this respect, it would be appropriate to refer to
judgment dated 05.07.2024 passed in SLP(Criminal) Diary
No.27298/2024, titled Bhupatji Sartajji Jabraji Thakor Vs. The
State of Gujarat. The relevant extract is being reproduced
hereinbelow:-
“There is a fine distinction between a sentence imposed
by the trial court for a fixed term and sentence life
imprisonment. If a sentence is for a fixed term, ordinarily,the appellate court may exercise its discretion to suspend
the operation of the same liberally unless there are any
exceptional circumstances emerging from the record to
decline. However, when it is a case of life imprisonment,
the only legal test which the Court should apply is toascertain whether there is anything palpable or apparent
on the face of the record on the basis of which the court
can come to the conclusion that the conviction is notsustainable in law and that the convict has very fair
chances of succeeding in his appeal. For applying suchtest, it is also not permissible for the court to undertake
the exercise of re-appreciating the evidence. The
emphasis is on the word “palpable” and the expression“apparent on the face of the record”.
6. After perusing the record, it is evident that there are no
exceptional circumstances emerging thereof necessitating declining
of relief as is being sought.
7. The instant appeal is of the year 2025 and the same is not
likely to be decided in near future. Therefore, in view of the facts and
circumstances of the case and keeping in view of the aforesaid
judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court, the substantive sentence
imposed upon the applicant by the Trial Court vide judgment of
conviction and order of sentence dated 20.12.2024, passed by
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
learned Special Judge, Hamirpur, H.P., in POCSO Act No.18 of
2023, shall remain suspended, till final disposal of the appeal,
.
however, subject to the applicant’s furnishing personal bond in the
sum of Rs. 50,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the
satisfaction of learned Trial Court and also subject to deposit of the
fine amount, if not already deposited. On furnishing the requisite bail
bonds and on depositing the fine amount, he be released forthwith, if
not required in any other case, however, with the undertaking to
appear before this Court as and when directed and in the event of
the dismissal of the appeal, the applicant/appellant will surrender
before the Court.
8. However, it is made clear that the applicant shall not indulge
himself in the same crime and maintain good social behaviour, or
else, this order shall be liable to be cancelled.
9. Be it stated that any expression of opinion given in this order
does not mean an expression of opinion on the merits of the case
and the same has been given only for the purpose of deciding the
present application. The application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 02, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Rajesh Thakur vs. State of HP and another
Cr.MMO No.1 of 2025
.
02.01.2025 Present: Mr. Sanjay Jaswal, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.1/State.
Cr. MMO No.1/2025
Notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate
General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of
respondent No.1. On taking steps within three days, issue notice
to respondents No.2 and 3, returnable within four weeks.
List after four weeks.
Cr.MP No.16/2025
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he is under
instructions not to press this application, at this stage.
Accordingly, the instant application is dismissed as not pressed.
The application stands disposed of.
Cr.MP No.15/2025
Allowed and the applicant is exempted from filing complete
typed English translation of the document(s), in question,
annexed with the accompanying petition, at this stage, subject to
filing of the same within seven days, as and when directed to do
so.
The application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 02, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
Mahinder Singh vs. Ashok Kumar and another
Criminal Revision No.856 of 2024
.
02.01.2025 Present: Mr. R.L. Chaudhary, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent No.2/State.
Cr. Revision No.856/2024
Notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate
General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of
respondent No.2. On taking steps within three days, issue notice
to respondent No.1, returnable within four weeks.
List after four weeks.
Cr.MP No.5539/2024
Notice in the aforesaid terms.
The applicant-petitioner has preferred the present petition
against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated
23.04.2024, passed by learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Court
No.III, Hamirpur, H.P. (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Trial Court’), in
Criminal Complaint No.50-I-2019 (CIS Registration No.357 of 2019),
titled Ashok Kumar vs. Mohinder Singh, and affirmed by learned
Sessions Judge, Hamirpur, District Hamirpur, Himachal Pradesh, in
Criminal Appeal No.54 of 2024, titled Mohinder Singh vs. Ashok
Kumar and another, decided on 21.11.2024. The Revision Petition
filed raises arguable points. Hence, the sentence in the case at
hand, is ordered to be suspended, subject to the petitioner
depositing 50% of the cheque amount within a period of four weeks
from today and also subject to his furnishing a personal bond in the
sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:43 :::CIS
satisfaction of the learned trial Court, undertaking therein that
.
petitioner will attend this Court as and when required and in case of
dismissal of the revision petition, he will immediately surrender
before the learned trial Court to receive the sentence. A copy of this
order be sent to the learned trial Court with the direction that the
report of compliance of this order be submitted to this Court within a
period of six weeks.
List on 24.02.2024. In the meanwhile, reply, if any on behalf
of respondent No.2/State be filed.
Cr.MP No.5540/2024
The application is disposed of with a direction to the
applicant/petitioner to file certified copy of the trial Court
judgment, on or before the next date of hearing.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 02, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:44 :::CIS
State of Himachal Pradesh and another vs. Bimla Devi
and another
CMPMO No.758 of 2024
.
02.01.2025 Present: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
petitioners/State.
CMPMO No.758/2024
On taking steps within three days, issue notice to the
respondents, returnable within four weeks.
CMP No.26220/2024
Subject to the deposit of awarded amount, in the case at
hand, during the pendency of the petition, operation and
execution of impugned award dated 28.03.2024, passed by
learned Additional District Judge (II), Shimla, District Shimla,
H.P., in Civil Appeal No.229-S/6 of 2018, titled Bimla Devi and
another vs. State of H.P. and another, shall remain stayed. The
awarded amount be deposited within four weeks from today.
Application stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 02, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:44 :::CIS
Prashant Guleria vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Cr. Appeal No.714 of 2024
.
02.01.2025 Present: Mr. Lakshay Parihar, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
Cr. Appeal No.714/2024
Notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate
General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the
respondent-State.
Call for the records.
List the matter after ensuing winter vacation in the first
week of March, 2025.
Cr.MP No.5542/2024
Notice in the aforesaid terms. Reply be filed on or before
the next date of hearing.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 02, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:44 :::CIS
NTPC Limited vs. Nanki (deceased) through LRs. And
others
Civil Revision No.207 of 2024
.
02.01.2025 Present: Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate with Ms. Rinki
Kashmiri, Advocate, for the petitioner.
At the request of learned counsel for the petitioner, list on
04.01.2025.
January 02, 2025 (KS)
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:44 :::CIS
Ramesh Kumar vs. Savitri Verma a/w connected
matter
Civil Revision No.121 of 2023
.
Civil Revision No.122 of 2023
01.01.2025 Present: Mr. Anuj Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioners, in both the
petitions.
Mr. Vaibhav Tanwar, Advocate, for the respondents, in
both the petitions.
At the request of learned counsel for the petitioner, list on
06.01.2025. r
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 01, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:44 :::CIS
Raman Kumar vs. State of HP
Criminal Revision No.294 of 2022
.
01.01.2025 Present: Mr. Karan Veer Singh and Mr. Ritu Singh, Advocates, for
the petitioner.
Mr. R.S. Verma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
At the request of learned counsel for the petitioner, list the
matter after ensuing winter vacation in the third week of March,
2025. r
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 01, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:44 :::CIS
Desh Raj vs. Shriram Transport Finance Co. Ltd. and
another
Civil Revision No.104 of 2022
.
01.01.2025 Present: Ms. Simran, Advocate, vice Mr. Varun Thakur, Advocate,
for the petitioner.
Mr. Ashwani Kaundal, Advocate, for the respondents.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the arguing
counsel is unavailable today on account of bereavement in the
family. She seeks an adjournment.
As prayed, list the matter after ensuing winter vacation in
the second week of March, 2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 01, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:44 :::CIS
Banarsi Dass (deceased) through LRs. vs. Baldev
Singh (deceased) through LRs. And others
.
Civil Revision No.67 of 2020
01.01.2025 Present: Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate with Ms. Rinki
Kashmiri, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. K.D. Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sanjeev Sood,
Advocate, for respondents No.2(a) to 2(d).
Respondents No.1(a) to 1(d) and 3(a) to 3(c) proceeded
against ex parte vide order dated 22.09.2021.
r to
At the request of learned counsel for the petitioners, list
the matter after ensuing winter vacation in the second week of
March, 2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 01, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:44 :::CIS
Nitin Karol vs. Sushil Bhagra
Civil Revision No.51 of 2022
.
01.01.2025 Present: Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate with Ms. Rinki
Kashmiri, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Ashok Sood, Senior Advocate with Ms. Pooja Verma,
Advocate, for the respondent.
CMP No.12116/2024
By virtue of order dated 20.12.2023, passed in CMP
No.11606 of 2022, the use and occupation charges, were fixed @
Rs.10,000/- per month from May, 2021 till December, 2023. In
the same order, from January, 2024, the rate of use and
occupation charges, was fixed @ Rs.12,000/-per month.
In the case at hand, eviction was ordered by the trial Court
on 20.08.2019. Appeal whereof was decided on 06.04.2021.
The limited grievance raised in the present application is that in
order dated 20.12.2023, the use and occupation charges from
20.08.2019 till April, 2021 have not been granted.
Learned counsel, on instructions received from their
respective parties, submit that from 20.08.2019 till April, 2021, the
use and occupation charges @ Rs.5,500/- would satisfy the claim
being raised in the present application. Ordered accordingly.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
aforesaid use and occupation charges shall be deposited in the
Registry of this Court within eight weeks from today. Application
stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 01, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:44 :::CIS
Yogesh Kumar vs. State of HP and another
Cr.MP(M) No.2673 of 2024
.
01.01.2025 Present: Mr. Sunny Rawat, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. R.S. Verma, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
Learned Additional Advocate General submits that
inadvertently the next date was wrongly communicated to the
concerned Police Officials as 06.01.2025.
whereof, status report could not be filed today.
r As a consequence
In view thereof, list the matter on 06.01.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 01, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:44 :::CIS
Sunil Dutt vs. Dharam Dass
Cr.MP(M) No.2384 of 2024
.
01.01.2025 Present: Mr. Mukul Sood, Advocate, for the petitioner.
None for the respondent.
Cr.MP(M) No.2384/2024
Previously, counsel had appeared for the respondent, but
has been filed.
r to
today no one is present on behalf of the respondent. No reply
From the bona fide reasons and sufficient cause shown in
the application, it is evident that the applicant was bona fidely,
diligently pursuing remedies available in law. Other than the
aforesaid, in the interest of justice, delay of 45 days in filing the
present criminal appeal is condoned. Application stands
disposed of.
Cr. Appeal No._______/2025
Be registered.
Records be called for.
List the matter after ensuing winter vacation in the third
week of March, 2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 01, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:44 :::CIS
Mani Ram vs. Karam Dass
Criminal Revision No.688 of 2024
.
01.01.2025 Present: Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate, vice Mr. R.S. Chandel,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Time to comply with order dated 28.10.2024, as prayed, is
extended by four weeks from today.
Let fresh steps for the service of respondent be taken
within one week.
On taking such steps, issue notice to the
respondent, returnable within four weeks.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 01, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:44 :::CIS
Suresh Kumar vs. Meena Kumari
CMPMO No.543 of 2024
.
01.01.2025 Present: None for the petitioner.
Mr. Raju Ram Rahi, Advocate, for the respondent.
Despite repeated calls, there is no appearance on behalf
of the petitioner. In the interest of justice, list the matter for
consideration after ensuing winter vacation in the first week of
March, 2025. r
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 01, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:44 :::CIS
Jai Karan Kumar vs. UCO Bank
Criminal Revision No.381 of 2024
.
01.01.2025 Present: Mr. Mukul Sood, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Gaurav Kumar, Advocate, for the respondent.
Time to comply with order dated 08.07.2024, as prayed, is
extended by four weeks from today.
Record stands received. Learned counsel for the parties
intend to go through the same.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on account
of loan liability, the respondent-Bank has sold the property of the
petitioner and, thus, recovered a sum of Rs.8.25 lacs. Insofar as
the balance amount is concerned, negotiations are in progress on
account of One Time Settlement (OTS) inter se petitioner/
accused and respondent/complainant, which according to learned
counsel for the parties, will bear fruit in the near future. As a
consequence whereof, list the matter for consideration after
ensuing winter vacation in the second week of March, 2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 01, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:44 :::CIS
Kiran Bala vs. Ram Pal and others
CMPMO No.229 of 2024
.
01.01.2025 Present: Ms. Shrutika Chauhan, Advocate, vice Mr. Dheeraj K.
Vashisht, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Parmod Singh Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
CMP(M) No.1810/2024
Reply, as prayed, be filed within four weeks.
CMPMO No.229/2024
At the joint request of learned counsel for the parties, list
the matter for consideration after ensuing winter vacation in the
second week of March, 2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 01, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:44 :::CIS
Ratku Devi vs. Paramjit Sigh and others
CMPMO No.207 of 2024
.
01.01.2025 Present: Ms Meera Devi, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms. Simran, Advocate, vice Ms. Kusum Chaudhary,
Advocate, for respondent No.3.
CMP No.25645/2024
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-applicant.
Respondent No.9-Smt. Devku is stated to have died.
The right to sue inheres/survives in the legal heirs of
deceased respondent No.9. Since the legal heirs of deceased
respondent No.9-Smt. Devku are already on record as per proforma
respondents No.6 to 8 and 10, therefore, the present application is
allowed. Name of respondent No.9 is ordered to be deleted from the
array of the parties. Amended memo of parties be filed within a
period of one week. Application stands disposed of.
CMPMO No.207/2024
Let fresh steps for the service of respondents No.1, 2, 4 and
5, by way of filing correct address, be taken within one week. On
taking such steps, issue notice to the said respondents, returnable
within four weeks.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that an
appropriate application under Order 22 Rule 4 of the Civil Procedure
Code for bringing on record the legal heirs of deceased respondent
No.7 stands filed. However, the same is not on record.
Registry to trace the same and place it on record well before
the next date of hearing post removal of objection(s), if any.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 01, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:44 :::CIS
Harvant Singh Cheema vs. Raj Cheema (since
deceased) through LRs. and another
CMPMO No.46 of 2022
.
01.01.2025 Present: Mr. Parikshit Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Vipin Pandit,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Senior Advocate with Mr. Devi Singh
Verma, Advocate, for proposed representatives of
respondent No.1, who is stated to be dead.
Mr. Balram Sharma, Deputy Solicitor General of India with
Mr. Rajiv Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.2/Union of
India.
CMP No.26422/2024
Time prayed on behalf of the non-applicants to file reply to
the present application. Let the needful be done on or before the
next date of hearing.
List on 07.01.2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 01, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:44 :::CIS
Vishnu Dutt vs. Surender Dutt
Cr. Revision No.38 of 2021
.
01.01.2025 Present: Mr. Mehar Chand Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms. Shashi Kiran, Advocate, vice Mr. Rupinder Singh
Thakur, Advocate, for the respondent.
Learned counsel for the parties jointly submit that there is
a possibility of amicable settlement inter se the parties. In view
thereof, list the matter after ensuing winter vacation in the first
week of March, 2025.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 01, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:44 :::CIS
Damber Bohra vs. State of HP
Cr.MP(M) No.3011 of 2024
.
01.01.2025 Present: Mr. Vinod Kumar Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. C.D. Negi,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
Notice. Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, learned Additional Advocate
General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the
respondent-State. He prays for and is granted four week’s time to
file status report.
List on 31.01.2025, on which date, respondent/State shall
also file Status report.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 01, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:44 :::CIS
Ajay Kumar vs. State of HP
Cr.MP(M) No.3010 of 2024
.
01.01.2025 Present: Mr. Yuyutsu Singh Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. Ravi Tanta,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
Notice. Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, learned Additional Advocate
General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the
respondent-State. He prays for and is granted four week’s time to
file status report.
List on 24.01.2025, on which date, respondent/State shall
also file Status report.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 01, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:44 :::CIS
Rohit Kumar vs. State of HP
Cr.MP(M) No.2982 of 2024
.
01.01.2025 Present: Mr. Parikshit Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
Notice. Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, learned Additional Advocate
General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the
file status report.
r to
respondent-State. He prays for and is granted four week’s time to
List on 31.01.2025, on which date, respondent/State shall
also file Status report.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 01, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:44 :::CIS
Bhanu Kiran Khosla and others vs. State of HP and
others
Cr.MMO No.1343 of 2024
.
01.01.2025 Present: Mr. Tara Singh Chauhan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Surya
Chauhan, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for the
respondent/State.
At the request of learned counsel for the petitioners, list on
07.01.2025.
r to ( Bipin C. Negi )
January 01, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:44 :::CIS
Kapil Dev Sharma vs. Kaptan Singh Dhadwal and
Another
Cr.MP(M) No.1876 of 2024
.
09.01.2025 Present: Mr. Aditya Kaushal, Advocate, for the applicant/ appellant.
Respondent No.1 is served, but none has put in
appearance.
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for
respondent No.2/State.
Cr.MP(M) No.1876/2024
applicant/respondent.
r to
No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-
From the reasons and sufficient cause shown in the
application, it is evident that the applicant was diligently, bona
fidely, pursuing remedies available to him under law. No inaction
is attributable to the applicant on account of the explanation
offered in the application for getting the delay of 48 days in filing
the appeal condoned.
Other than the aforesaid, in the interest of justice, delay of
48 days in filing the present criminal appeal is condoned.
Application stands disposed of.
Cr. Appeal No._______/2025
Be registered.
Vide separate judgment of the even date placed on the
file, present appeal stands disposed of.
( Bipin C. Negi )
January 09, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:44 :::CIS
.
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:44 :::CIS
Satish Kumar and Anr. vs. State of HP and Ors.
CWP No. 6206 of 2025
.
11.04.2025 Present: Mr. Rakesh Kumar Dogra, Advocate, for the
petitioners.
Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Navlesh
Verma and Ms. Sharmila Patial, Additional Advocates
General, for the respondents-State.
CWP No.6206 of 2025 & CMP No.7735 of 2025
accepts
r to
Notice. Ms. Sharmila Patial, learned Additional Advocate
General, service of notice on behalf
respondents/State. Reply, if any, be filed within three weeks.
of the
List alongwith CWP No.3361 of 2025 on 06.05.2025.
In the meanwhile, salaries of the petitioners, even though
re-fixed, shall not be given effect and no recovery whatsoever
shall be effected from the petitioners on the basis of impugned
office order dated 28.03.2025 (Annexure P-6).
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 11, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:44 :::CIS
Padmavati Verma vs. State of HP and Ors.
CWP No. 6205 of 2025
.
11.04.2025 Present: Mr. L.S. Mehta, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Navlesh
Verma and Ms. Sharmila Patial, Additional Advocates
General, for the respondents-State.
CWP No.6205 of 2025 & CMP No.7733 of 2025
Notice. Ms. Sharmila Patial, learned Additional Advocate
General, accepts
r service of notice on behalf of the
respondents/State. Reply, if any, be filed within three weeks.
List alongwith CWP No.3361 of 2025 on 06.05.2025.
In the meanwhile, salaries of the petitioners, even though
re-fixed, shall not be given effect and no recovery whatsoever
shall be effected from the petitioners on the basis of impugned
office order dated 28.03.2025 (Annexure P-5).
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge
( Bipin C. Negi )
April 11, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:44 :::CIS
Anil Kumar @ Nillu @ Kamlesh vs. Central Bureau of
Investigation
Cr. Appeal No.261 of 2021
.
05.05.2025 Present: Mr. Jeevesh Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Mohinder Singh
Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Janesh Mahajan, Advocate, for the respondents-
Central Bureau of Investigation.
Mr. Jeevesh Sharma, learned vice counsel appearing on
behalf of the appellant submits that Mr. Mohinder Singh Thakur,
Advocate for the appellant has yet not fully recovered, therefore,
the case be listed after six weeks.
We are of the considered view that taking into account the
facts that the case is pending consideration since 2021 and the
appeal is against the judgment of conviction, the case cannot be
adjourned by six weeks. However, in the interest of justice, the
case is ordered to be listed on 19.05.2025, to enable the
appellant to make alternative arrangements. The appellant can
be granted legal aid also, if he so desires.
(Ajay Mohan Goel)
Judge
( Bipin C. Negi )
May 05, 2025 (KS) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2025 21:27:44 :::CIS
अर्धवार्षिक परीक्षा हेतु पाठ्यक् रम
(1) अपठित गद्यांश
(2) पत्र लेखन
.
(3) पाठ्य पुस्तकें भाषा माधुरी एवं भाषा अभ्यास
(१) भारत देश
(२) हाथी और चिड़िया
(३) बहादुर दोस्त
(४) घमंडी मक्खी
(५) दादा जी
(६) अगर पेड़ भी चलते होते
(७) गीत का कमाल
(4) जीवन मूल्य पर आधारित प्रश्न
(For Reading Bonus) 👆
(5) पुस्तक “रोचक कहानी” में से प्रश्नों के उत्तर
::: Downloaded on – 23/07/2025 21:27:44 :::CIS
[ad_1]
Source link