Naresh Palliwal vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:33897) on 1 August, 2025

0
14

Rajasthan High Court – Jodhpur

Naresh Palliwal vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:33897) on 1 August, 2025

[2025:RJ-JD:33897]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
    S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8968/2025

Naresh Palliwal S/o Bhawanishankar Palliwal, Aged About 45
Years, R/o 46A, Sajjannagar, P.S. Ambamata, District Udaipur.
(At Present Lodged In Central Jail Udaipur)
                                                                   ----Petitioner
                                    Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor
                                                                 ----Respondent


For Petitioner(s)         :     Mr. Abhishek Charan
For Respondent(s)         :     Mr. Hanuman Prajapati, Public
                                Prosecutor



          HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUKESH RAJPUROHIT

Order

01/08/2025

The instant application for bail under Section 483 of BNSS

(439 of Cr.P.C.) has been filed by the petitioner who has been

arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.121/2025, registered at

Police Station Sukher, District – Udaipur, for the offences under

Sections 111(2)(b), 111(3), 111(6), 140(2), 308(2), 308(3),

308(4), 318(2), 318(4) & 61(2)(a) of the BNS.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public

Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that except the

offences under Sections 111(2)(b), 111(3) & 111(6) of BNS, all

the offences alleged to have been committed by the petitioner are

triable by court of Magistrate and the petitioner has been falsely

implicated in this case only on the basis of his previous criminal

(Downloaded on 04/08/2025 at 09:47:43 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:33897] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-8968/2025]

antecedents. As per the prosecution, the role of the petitioner in

this case is that he got executed an agreement to sell in his favour

of a land which belong to one Pushkar Dangi. It is submitted that

in the FIR, the main allegations are levelled against co-accused

Deelip Nath. Learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn

attention of this Court towards the order dated 17.07.2025,

passed by this Court in S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application

No.5378/2025, whereby this Court has enlarged the co-accused

Naresh S/o Premdas on bail. It is submitted that the petitioner is

in judicial custody since 15.04.2025, the charge-sheet has already

been filed and the trial of the case will take sufficiently long time,

therefore, the benefit of bail may be granted to the accused-

petitioner.

Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail

application and submitted that the petitioner is having 14 previous

criminal antecedents against him, therefore, he may not be

enlarged on bail.

Having considered the rival submissions, facts and

circumstances of the case; the petitioner is in judicial custody

since 15.04.2025, the charge-sheet has already been filed and the

trial of the case will take sufficiently long time, without expressing

any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, this Court is inclined

to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 of BNSS

(439 of Cr.P.C.) is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-

petitioner Naresh Palliwal S/o Bhawanishankar Palliwal,

arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.121/2025, registered at

(Downloaded on 04/08/2025 at 09:47:43 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:33897] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-8968/2025]

Police Station Sukher, District – Udaipur, shall be released on bail,

if not wanted in any other case, provided he furnishes a personal

bond of Rs.50,000/- and two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each, to the

satisfaction of learned trial court, for his appearance before that

court on each & every date of hearing and whenever called upon

to do so till completion of the trial.

In addition to the above, the petitioner is directed to appear

before the concerned Police Station in the first week of every

quarter of the year and mark his presence.

It is made clear that if the petitioner indulges in any similar

kind of criminal activity, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free

to file an application for cancellation of bail.

(MUKESH RAJPUROHIT),J
5-Ramesh/-

(Downloaded on 04/08/2025 at 09:47:43 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

[ad_1]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here