Rajasthan High Court – Jaipur
Naval Kishor Pareek Son Of Umesh Chandra … vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jp:28654) on 29 July, 2025
Author: Sameer Jain
Bench: Sameer Jain
[2025:RJ-JP:28654]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 4244/2025
Naval Kishor Pareek Son Of Umesh Chandra Pareek, Resident Of
Plot No. 10, Balaji Vihar-40, Near Saint Teresa School Nivaru
Road, Jhotwara, Jaipur (Raj).
----Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Public Prosecutor.
2. Dr. Mohar Singh Son Of Mr. Tara Chand, Resident Of D-46,
Paramhans Colony, Murlipura, Jaipur City ( West), Jaipur
(Raj).
—-Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ravindra Kumar Paliwal
For State : Mr. M. S. Shekhawat, PP with
Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP with
Mr. Manoj Kumar, SHO, Pratap Nagar
For Complainant : Mr. Jaswant Singh Rathore
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Judgment
29/07/2025
1. This petition under Section 528 of BNSS is filed, with a
prayer to quash the FIR No. 215/2022 registered at Police Station
Sanganer District Jaipur City (East) for offences under Sections
420, 406, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of IPC, on the basis of
compromise effectuated between the parties herein, in respect of
their inter-se dispute.
2. Learned counsel for both the parties, in presence of their
respective clients, have submitted that the dispute at hand is
inter-se private in nature, which has been resolved by the parties
amicably.
3. Heard and considered.
(Downloaded on 05/08/2025 at 09:52:04 PM)
[2025:RJ-JP:28654] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-4244/2025]
4. At the outset, this Court deems it appropriate to place
reliance upon the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in
Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab [(2012) 10 SCC 303] and
Ramgopal Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh reported in
[2022 (14) SCC 531], relevant portion of which is reproduced
below:
“12. The High Court, therefore, having regard to the
nature of the offence and the fact that parties have
amicably settled their dispute and the victim has willingly
consented to the nullification of criminal proceedings, can
quash such proceedings in exercise of its inherent powers
under Section 482 Cr.P.C., even if the offences are non-
compoundable.”
5. In view of the position of law laid down by the Hon’ble Apex
Court in aforementioned case, and considering the personal nature
of dispute, which has been amicably settled between parties, this
Court deems it just and proper to allow the present misc. petition.
Compromise is taken on record.
6. Considering the aforementioned, the present criminal
miscellaneous petition is allowed and the FIR No. 215/2022
registered at Police Station Sanganer District Jaipur City (East)
with all consequential proceedings, are hereby quashed and set
aside.
7. Accordingly, the instant petition is allowed. Pending
application(s), if any, stand disposed of.
(SAMEER JAIN),J
Pooja /425
(Downloaded on 05/08/2025 at 09:52:04 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)