Naveen Jaitely vs S.K. Trikha on 20 August, 2025

0
2


1. Leave granted.

2. Despite service of notice upon the respondent,

no one has put in appearance on behalf of the

respondent.

3. Heard learned counsel for the appellant.

4. A cheque of Rs.20,00,000/- was dishonored.

Accordingly, a complaint was made under Section 138

of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The

Trial Court convicted the appellant and awarded

sentence of ten months of simple imprisonment with

further direction to pay compensation of

Rs.30,00,000/-. The aforesaid conviction and

sentence was affirmed by the First Appellate Court.

The criminal revision filed against the aforesaid

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 3643 OF 2025

conviction and the revision has been entertained by

the High Court, but the application for suspension

of sentence has been rejected.



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here