1. Heard learned counsel for the revisionist, learned AGA for the State of U.P. and perused the record.
2. By means of this revision under Section 397/401 482 Cr.P.C., the revisionists have prayed for quashing the impugned order dated 06.06.2025 passed by learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Court No. 9, Unnao (in short “trial Court”) in Session Trial No. 174 of 2025, arising out of Case Crime No. 386 of 2023, under Sections 504, 323, 336, 308, 324, 325 IPC, Police Station – Gangaghat, District – Unnao.
3. Vide impugned order dated 06.06.2025, the trial court has rejected the application of the applicant seeking discharge.
4. Challenging the order impugned dated 06.06.2025 as also seeking discharge from the offence indicated under Sections 504, 323, 336, 308, 324, 325 IPC, learned counsel for the revisionists stated that the FIR in issue was lodged on 05.07.2023 under Sections 504, 323, 336 IPC and after investigation, the charge-sheet was filed under Sections 504, 323, 336, 308, 324, 325 and accordingly, it can be inferred that the case set up in the FIR is completely false and concocted and thus, as also without considering the material available on record, according to which no offense is made out against the applicants, while rejecting the prayer of discharge under Section 227 Cr.P.C., the trial Court committed error in law and fact both.